Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 77 references

High-efficiency and broadband coherent optical comb generation in integrated X-cut lithium niobate microresonators

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper reports the first normal-dispersion Kerr microcombs on X-cut thin-film lithium niobate, achieving 54% pump-to-comb conversion efficiency and discovering a coherent two-interleaved-comb state from Kerr-Raman cooperation.

desk verdict First normal-dispersion Kerr microcombs on X-cut TFLN with record Q and >50% efficiency; the new interleaved Kerr-Raman state is plausible but needs direct CEO-offset evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.21272 v1 pith:HRS3QOFD submitted 2025-07-28 physics.optics

Yunxiang Song , Zongda Li , Xinrui Zhu , Norman Lippok , Miro Erkintalo , Marko Loncar This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords microcombsKerrfrequencycombsX-cutthin-filmlithiumniobatenormaldispersionstimulatedRamanscatteringavoidedmodecrossingsintegratedphotonicselectro-opticcompatibility
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first normal-dispersion Kerr microcombs on X-cut thin-film lithium niobate (TFLN), the integrated platform prized for its electro-optic response. By orienting racetrack resonators to minimize the material's anisotropic Raman gain and inserting a non-adiabatic taper that supplies avoided mode crossings, the authors obtain combs with 54% pump-to-comb conversion efficiency, over 24 THz of spectral bandwidth, and roughly 8 mW turn-on power. They also identify and simulate a new kind of coherent microcomb in which normal-dispersion Kerr dynamics and stimulated Raman scattering cooperate, producing two interleaved combs centered on the pump and Stokes frequencies and spanning nearly 33 THz. If these results hold, a single X-cut TFLN chip could combine the comb source with high-speed electro-optic modulation, removing a major obstacle to monolithic microcomb-driven systems.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is a racetrack microresonator whose orientation relative to the X-cut TFLN crystal axes lowers the round-trip Raman fraction $f_R$, the ratio of Raman to Kerr nonlinear response, combined with a rapidly tapering non-adiabatic waveguide section that converts a controlled fraction of the TE0 mode into the TE1 mode. The taper creates a localized avoided mode crossing in the dispersion profile, which locally perturbs the resonance frequencies and seeds normal-dispersion Kerr comb formation under continuous-wave driving. A generalized Lugiato-Lefever equation with a Lorentzian Raman response and experimentally tuned parameters reproduces the observed spectra and identifies the temporal waveforms, including the picosecond quasi-rectangular pulse with rapid oscillations at the Stokes shift that underlies the interleaved Kerr-Raman comb.

What would settle it

Measure the Raman spectrum of each fabricated racetrack directly, extract $f_R$ independently, and then check whether the stable interleaved Kerr-Raman comb appears at the predicted pump detuning and threshold without re-fitting $f_R$; if the state appears independent of $f_R$, or if the simulated spectra only match after freely adjusting $f_R$ per device, the proposed Kerr-Raman synergy would not be confirmed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that X-cut TFLN, despite its strong and complex Raman response, can support high-performance normal-dispersion Kerr microcombs when the resonator geometry is used to suppress Raman gain and to engineer avoided mode crossings. Specifically, a 102.4 GHz-FSR racetrack microresonator yields a comb with 19 lines in the C-band and 14 in the L-band with less than 2 dB variation, a measured pump-to-comb conversion efficiency of 54%, and an on-chip turn-on power of about 8 mW; linewidth measurements reveal quiet modes whose intrinsic linewidths fall below that of the pump, with the quietest mode blue-shifted from the pump. In a second, 25.7 GHz-FSR device, the paper reports a stable coherent state comprising two interleaved frequency combs, one around the pump at roughly 1592 nm and one around the Stokes-shifted wavelength at roughly 1762 nm, with the same repetition rate but different carrier-envelope offset frequencies and a total span of nearly 33 THz. The paper argues this state is mechanically distinct from Stokes solitons and from two-pumped cavity solitons, and that it emerges from the synergetic interplay of Kerr and stimulated Raman scattering in a single spatial mode.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's interpretation rests on the assumption that a single-scalar-field generalized Lugiato-Lefever equation with a Lorentzian Raman response, whose Raman fraction is chosen for each device, faithfully captures the strongly multimode, anisotropic dynamics of the real X-cut TFLN racetrack resonators.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single X-cut TFLN chip can host both the microcomb source and high-speed electro-optic modulators, eliminating chip-to-chip coupling losses in comb-driven systems.
  • Normal-dispersion combs on this platform inherit the flat spectral profile, high conversion efficiency, and low turn-on power needed for WDM communications and signal processing.
  • The new interleaved Kerr-Raman comb state shows that stimulated Raman scattering can extend a microcomb's spectrum into widely separated wavelength bands rather than simply destroying it.
  • The measured quiet-mode linewidths indicate that pump noise transduction in normal-dispersion combs follows the same general scaling as in anomalous-dispersion soliton combs, with the quietest modes shifted from the pump.
  • Suppressing parasitic Raman effects may also enable other Kerr-nonlinearity-based devices, such as parametric oscillators and optical isolators, on the same platform.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the racetrack orientation genuinely controls $f_R$ with the repeatability claimed, the same design rule should transfer to other anisotropic crystalline platforms such as lithium tantalate, giving a generic knob for balancing Raman and Kerr effects.
  • Because the two interleaved combs share a repetition rate but differ in carrier-envelope offset, the state is a single-resonator dual-comb source; it may be usable for dual-comb spectroscopy or as a self-referencing seed, though the paper does not demonstrate those uses.
  • The linewidth parabola's shift implies that engineering the collective dispersive-wave recoil from avoided mode crossings could be used as a design lever to place quiet comb lines at desired wavelengths, an extension the paper hints at but does not pursue.
  • A direct test of the proposed mechanism would be to vary the taper-induced avoided-mode-crossing strength and the racetrack orientation independently and check that the onset of the interleaved state tracks the simulated $f_R$ threshold.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper reports the generation of normal-dispersion Kerr microcombs in racetrack microresonators on X-cut thin-film lithium niobate. The authors engineer avoided mode crossings through non-adiabatic waveguide tapers, achieving high intrinsic Q factors (up to ~15 million) and demonstrating a 102.4 GHz repetition-rate comb with broad bandwidth (>24 THz), pump-to-comb conversion efficiency up to 54%, and low on-chip turn-on power (~8 mW). They also present a 25.7 GHz-FSR device in which a normal-dispersion Kerr comb coexists with a strong Stokes-shifted feature; based on gLLE simulations with a fitted Raman fraction, they interpret this as a new state consisting of two interleaved frequency combs with distinct carrier-envelope offset frequencies. The paper includes measurements of optical linewidths showing 'quiet' modes with reduced Lorentzian linewidth relative to the pump.

Significance. The experimental results are potentially significant for integrated photonics: normal-dispersion combs on an EO-compatible platform with high efficiency and low threshold would enable monolithic comb sources with on-chip EO processing. The AMX engineering via non-adiabatic tapers appears robust and device-reproducible, and the linewidth noise scaling analysis (Fig. 3(e)) is a valuable addition to the literature on comb coherence. The claim of a new interleaved Kerr–Raman comb state, if validated, would be a novel nonlinear state. However, the current evidence for this state is incomplete, and the simulations used to support it rely on a free parameter (Raman fraction f_R) that is not independently constrained.

major comments (2)
  1. [Normal-dispersion Kerr and Raman Stokes microcombs; Figs. 4(f)–(i)] The central claim that the stable state in Fig. 4(f) consists of two interleaved frequency combs with distinct carrier-envelope offsets is not directly evidenced. The temporal walk-off shown in Fig. 4(h) is a simulation result, not a measurement, and walk-off between envelope and carrier oscillations can occur for a single comb with dispersion; it does not by itself imply two distinct CEO offsets. The optical spectra in Fig. 4(f) cannot resolve whether the Stokes feature belongs to a separate comb or is part of the same phase-locked comb. The clean f_FSR beatnote in Fig. 4(g) does not exclude a beatnote at a sub-FSR frequency (e.g., at the offset Δf = Ω_R mod f_FSR), which would be expected if two combs with different CEO were present; such sub-FSR measurements are not reported. To support the distinct-CEO claim, the authors should either (i) measure the RF spectrum below f_FSR to search for a modulation at the expected offset, or (ii) perform heterodyne measurements that directly reveal the CEO difference, or (iii) explicitly soften the claim to a single comb with Raman-shifted spectral content.
  2. [Results; gLLE simulations (Figs. 3(b), 4(b), 4(f)) and Discussion] The generalized Lugiato–Lefever simulations used to corroborate the interleaved-comb state rely on a Raman fraction f_R that is 'chosen for each device' without independent measurement. The agreement between the simulated spectra (red curves in Figs. 3(b), 4(b), 4(f)) and experiments is therefore not an independent confirmation of the underlying Raman dynamics or of the distinct-CEO interpretation. The authors should report the f_R values used, demonstrate the sensitivity of the predicted state to f_R, and, if possible, provide independent Raman spectroscopy of the same waveguides to constrain f_R. Without this, the simulation's prediction of a separate CEO-offset comb remains a hypothesis rather than a validated mechanism.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 3(e) and linewidth measurements] The paper should specify how the Lorentzian linewidths are extracted from the frequency noise PSDs and provide an error estimate for the quoted values; the current presentation gives no uncertainty on the linewidths or on the quadratic fit.
  2. [Abstract and general text] The abstract contains an extra space in 'e fficient', and the manuscript has several spacing and formatting artifacts (likely from typesetting); a careful proofread is needed.
  3. [Notation, first use of 'quiet modes'] The term 'quiet modes' is used without definition or a pointer to the reference; please clarify the meaning at first use.
  4. [Supplementary note availability] The paper references a Supplementary note for details of the efficiency comparison and linewidth measurements, but this material is not included in the arXiv submission; it should be available to reviewers to assess the quantitative claims.
  5. [Fig. 3(c) beatnote division] The electro-optically divided beatnote frequency is given as 102.4509 GHz; the division factor and the RF drive frequency should be stated for reproducibility.
  6. [Introduction, 'mechanically distinct'] The phrase 'mechanically distinct' from Stokes solitons is ambiguous; clarify whether it refers to the generation mechanism, phase-locking, or another physical distinction.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The interleaved-comb CEO claim rests on a gLLE 'tuned to the salient experimental parameters': the distinct-CEO mechanism is read off simulated temporal walk-off (Fig. 4h) rather than measured, and the Raman fraction f_R is not independently verified in the main text. Core efficiency, bandwidth, and coherence results are direct measurements and independent.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Introduction paragraph 3; Results, 'Normal-dispersion Kerr and Raman Stokes microcombs' (Fig. 4h-i discussion)]
    "Our experimental observations are corroborated and informed by numerical simulations of the generalized Lugiato-Lefever equation (gLLE), tuned to the salient experimental parameters... the oscillations exhibit a temporal drift relative to the background pulse envelope, signaling a phase-velocity mismatch between the center frequencies of the primary Kerr comb and the Raman Stokes comb. This in turn indicates that, while the two combs share the same line spacing, their carrier envelope offset frequencies are different."

    The claim that the measured stable state (Fig. 4f) consists of two interleaved combs with distinct carrier-envelope offsets is not supported by any direct measurement: an OSA spectrum and a single clean electronic beatnote cannot resolve CEO differences. The only supporting evidence is the temporal walk-off in the gLLE simulation, whose parameters are explicitly 'tuned to the salient experimental parameters', with the Raman fraction f_R assigned per device from the n_o/n_e ratio and no independent measurement of f_R or the Raman lineshape for the 25.7 GHz racetrack presented in the main text. To the extent that the simulated spectra in Figs.

full rationale

The paper's headline metrics (102.4 GHz repetition rate, >24 THz bandwidth, >50% pump-to-comb conversion efficiency, ~8 mW on-chip turn-on power, and clean repetition-rate beatnotes) are direct experimental measurements, so the primary claims are self-contained and not circular. The gLLE simulations are presented as corroboration rather than derivation ('corroborated and informed by numerical simulations ... tuned to the salient experimental parameters'), and no equation in the paper is defined in terms of a quantity it is used to predict. The one load-bearing interpretive step I flag is the assertion that the stable state of Fig. 4(f) consists of two interleaved combs with different carrier-envelope offsets: the only evidence adduced is the simulated temporal walk-off in Fig. 4(h)-(i), since the measured spectrum and beatnote cannot resolve CEO differences, and the paper presents no heterodyne measurement or independent Raman characterization constraining f_R for the 25.7 GHz device. If f_R was adjusted to reproduce the observed Raman-enhanced spectra, the simulated walk-off is a consequence of the fitted model, weakening the 'mechanically distinct from Stokes solitons' conclusion as an independent confirmation. The concern is conditional (the Supplementary note may anchor f_R to the n_o/n_e anisotropy from refs 42-43, which is external, falsifiable spectroscopy, not a circular self-citation), so the score stays below 6. The observed efficiency, bandwidth, and coherence claims remain direct, independent measurements. Overall: no strong circularity in the measured results; partial circularity in the mechanistic interpretation of the novel interleaved-comb state.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard microcomb physics and measured device parameters. The main free parameter is the Raman fraction in the simulations, which may be fitted. No new particles, forces, or entities are introduced. The axioms are domain assumptions about the validity of the gLLE model and about the material's anisotropic Raman properties.

free parameters (1)
  • Raman fraction f_R in gLLE simulations = not stated in main text
    Sets the relative strength of Raman gain in the generalized Lugiato-Lefever equation; for the 25.7 GHz-FSR device the Raman-mediated states are reproduced only for suitable f_R, which may be tuned to match the data rather than independently measured.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The generalized Lugiato-Lefever equation with a single scalar field and a Lorentzian Raman response describes the multimode X-cut TFLN resonator.
    All simulations in Figs. 3 and 4 rely on this model; the paper does not justify why a single spatial mode is sufficient for the Raman-Kerr state claimed to exist in a single mode.
  • domain assumption The anisotropic Raman response of X-cut TFLN allows Raman gain suppression by orienting the racetrack along the low-Raman crystal axis.
    Adopted from refs. 42-43 and used as a central design pillar in the Device design section; no direct measurement of the Raman suppression is shown in the main text.
  • domain assumption The non-adiabatic tapered waveguide introduces a controlled and reproducible AMX with negligible additional loss.
    Inferred from measured Q factors and coupling coefficients for eight devices; this is a key design claim but the loss budget of the taper itself is not directly measured.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of High-efficiency and broadband coherent optical comb generation in integrated X-cut lithium niobate microresonators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HRS3QOFD

@misc{pith2026250721272,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: High-efficiency and broadband coherent optical comb generation in integrated X-cut lithium niobate microresonators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HRS3QOFD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.21272}
}
abstract

The ability to generate efficient and coherent frequency combs using photonic integrated circuits offers tremendous potential for a range of applications. In particular, "microcombs" based on chip-integrated resonators are poised to revolutionize optical communication, computation, and sensing systems, especially when paired with fast electro-optic (EO) devices. X-cut thin-film lithium niobate (TFLN) is a promising platform for developing the next-generation of microcomb-driven integrated photonic systems, providing a diversity of functionalities through combined $\chi^{(3)}$ and EO nonlinearities. In this context, normal-dispersion Kerr microcombs are critically needed because of their standout advantages, yet this dispersion regime remains unexplored for comb generation on X-cut TFLN. Here, we leverage ultralow-loss photonic waveguides, as well as strategic resonator designs that allow us to tailor Raman effects and engineer desired spatial mode interactions, for the robust generation of normal-dispersion Kerr microcombs. Specifically, we show microcombs that substantially surpass state-of-the-art bright cavity soliton and EO microcombs on X-cut TFLN in key performance metrics. Additionally, we demonstrate a novel microcomb whose existence is underpinned by both normal-dispersion Kerr dynamics and stimulated Raman scattering, in a single spatial mode of a microresonator. This microcomb manifests itself as two interleaved frequency combs centered about the pump and Stokes frequencies, resulting in extended spectral spans. Our work will unlock high-speed and low energy consumption photonic circuits for communications, frequency synthesis, and signal processing enabled by a monolithic microcomb technology, while also stimulating further investigations of new nonlinear states that may synergize the strong hybrid nonlinearities unique to X-cut TFLN.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J., Gaeta, A

    Kippenberg, T. J., Gaeta, A. L., Lipson, M. & Gorodetsky, M. L. Dissipative Kerr solitons in optical microresonators. Science 361, eaan8083 (2018)

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Pasquazi, A. et al. Micro-combs: A novel generation of optical sources. Phys. Rep. 729, 1–81 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    L., Lipson, M

    Gaeta, A. L., Lipson, M. & Kippenberg, T. J. Photonic-chip-based frequency combs. Nat. Photonics 13, 158–169 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Shu, H. et al. Microcomb-driven silicon photonic systems. Nature 605, 457–463 (2022)

    2022

  5. [5]

    & Bowers, J

    Chang, L., Liu, S. & Bowers, J. E. Integrated optical frequency comb technologies. Nat. Photonics 16, 95–108 (2022)

    2022

  6. [6]

    Marin-Palomo, P. et al. Microresonator-based solitons for massively parallel coherent optical communications. Nature 546, 274–279 (2017)

    2017

  7. [7]

    Fülöp, A. et al. High-order coherent communications using mode-locked dark-pulse Kerr combs from microresonators. Nat. Commun. 9, 1598 (2018)

    2018

  8. [8]

    Jørgensen, A. A. et al. Petabit-per-second data transmission using a chip-scale microcomb ring resonator source. Nat. Photonics 16, 798–802 (2022)

    2022

Show all 77 references
  1. [9]

    Yang, K. Y . et al. Multi-dimensional data transmission using inverse-designed silicon photonics and microcombs. Nat. Commun. 13, 7862 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    Rizzo, A. et al. Massively scalable Kerr comb-driven silicon photonic link. Nat. Photonics 17, 781–790 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    Corcoran, B., Mitchell, A., Morandotti, R., Oxenløwe, L. K. & Moss, D. J. Optical microcombs for ultrahigh-bandwidth communications. Nat. Photonics 19, 451–462 (2025)

    2025

  4. [12]

    Xu, X. et al. Microcomb-Based Photonic RF Signal Processing. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 31, 1854–1857 (2019). 10

    2019

  5. [13]

    Feldmann, J. et al. Parallel convolutional processing using an integrated photonic tensor core. Nature 589, 52–58 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    Xu, X. et al. 11 TOPS photonic convolutional accelerator for optical neural networks. Nature 589, 44–51 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Bai, B. et al. Microcomb-based integrated photonic processing unit. Nat. Commun. 14, 66 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    & Vahala, K

    Bao, C., Suh, M.-G. & Vahala, K. Microresonator soliton dual-comb imaging. Optica 6, 1110 (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    Marchand, P. J. et al. Soliton microcomb based spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Nat. Commun. 12, 427 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    Liang, W. et al. Generation of a coherent near-infrared Kerr frequency comb in a monolithic microresonator with normal GVD. Opt. Lett. 39, 2920 (2014)

    2014

  11. [19]

    Xue, X. et al. Mode-locked dark pulse Kerr combs in normal-dispersion microresonators. Nat. Photonics 9, 594–600 (2015)

    2015

  12. [20]

    Huang, S.-W. et al. Mode-Locked Ultrashort Pulse Generation from On-Chip Normal Dispersion Microresonators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 053901 (2015)

    2015

  13. [21]

    Xue, X. et al. Normal-dispersion microcombs enabled by controllable mode interactions. Laser Photonics Rev. 9, L23–L28 (2015)

    2015

  14. [22]

    Kim, B. Y . et al. Turn-key, high-efficiency Kerr comb source. Opt. Lett. 44, 4475 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    Helgason, Ó. B. et al. Dissipative solitons in photonic molecules. Nat. Photonics 15, 305–310 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    Zang, J. et al. Laser power consumption of soliton formation in a bidirectional Kerr resonator. Nat. Photonics 19, 510–517 (2025). 11

    2025

  17. [25]

    Li, Q. et al. Stably accessing octave-spanning microresonator frequency combs in the soliton regime. Optica 4, 193 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    Pfeiffer, M. H. P. et al. Octave-spanning dissipative Kerr soliton frequency combs in Si_3N_4 microresonators. Optica 4, 684 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    Chang, L. et al. Ultra-efficient frequency comb generation in AlGaAs-on-insulator microresonators. Nat. Commun. 11, 1331 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    Yu, S.-P. et al. Spontaneous pulse formation in edgeless photonic crystal resonators. Nat. Photonics 15, 461–467 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    Liu, X. et al. Aluminum nitride nanophotonics for beyond-octave soliton microcomb generation and self-referencing. Nat. Commun. 12, 5428 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    Weng, H. et al. Directly accessing octave-spanning dissipative Kerr soliton frequency combs in an AlN microresonator. Photonics Res. 9, 1351 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    & Lončar, M

    Song, Y ., Hu, Y ., Zhu, X., Yang, K. & Lončar, M. Octave-spanning Kerr soliton frequency combs in dispersion- and dissipation-engineered lithium niobate microresonators. Light Sci. Appl. 13, 225 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Wang, C. et al. Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators operating at CMOS- compatible voltages. Nature 562, 101–104 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    Zhu, D. et al. Integrated photonics on thin-film lithium niobate. Adv. Opt. Photonics 13, 242 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    Wang, C. et al. Lithium tantalate photonic integrated circuits for volume manufacturing. Nature 629, 784–790 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Feng, H. et al. Integrated lithium niobate microwave photonic processing engine. Nature 627, 80–87 (2024). 12

    2024

  28. [36]

    Hu, Y . et al. Integrated electro-optics on thin-film lithium niobate. Nat. Rev. Phys. 7, 237– 254 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    Zhang, M. et al. Broadband electro-optic frequency comb generation in a lithium niobate microring resonator. Nature 568, 373–377 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    Hu, Y . et al. High-efficiency and broadband on-chip electro-optic frequency comb generators. Nat. Photonics 16, 679–685 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    Zhang, J. et al. Ultrabroadband integrated electro-optic frequency comb in lithium tantalate. Nature 637, 1096–1103 (2025)

    2025

  32. [40]

    Chen, Z. et al. Microwave-resonator-enabled broadband on-chip electro-optic frequency comb generation. Photonics Res. 13, 426 (2025)

    2025

  33. [41]

    Cai, J. et al. Stable soliton microcomb generation in X-cut lithium tantalate via thermal- assisted photorefractive suppression. Photonics Res. 13, 1955 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    Nie, B. et al. Soliton microcombs in X-cut LiNbO3 microresonators. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.07180 (2025)

    2025 doi arXiv

  35. [43]

    & Lončar, M

    Song, Y ., Zhu, X., Zuo, X., Huang, G. & Lončar, M. Stable gigahertz- and mmWave- repetition-rate soliton microcombs on X-cut lithium niobate. Optica 12, 693 (2025)

    2025

  36. [44]

    Yu, M. et al. Raman lasing and soliton mode-locking in lithium niobate microresonators. Light Sci. Appl. 9, 9 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    Lv, X. et al. Broadband microwave-rate dark pulse microcombs in dissipation-engineered LiNbO3 microresonators. Nat. Commun. 16, 2389 (2025)

    2025

  38. [46]

    Lei, F. et al. Optical linewidth of soliton microcombs. Nat. Commun. 13, 3161 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    Matsko, A. B. & Maleki, L. On timing jitter of mode locked Kerr frequency combs. Opt. Express 21, 28862 (2013). 13

    2013

  40. [48]

    & Kuse, N

    Nishimoto, K., Minoshima, K., Yasui, T. & Kuse, N. Investigation of the phase noise of a microresonator soliton comb. Opt. Express 28, 19295 (2020)

    2020

  41. [49]

    Yang, Q.-F., Yi, X., Yang, K. Y . & Vahala, K. Stokes solitons in optical microcavities. Nat. Phys. 13, 53–57 (2017)

    2017

  42. [50]

    M., Bi, T

    Zhang, S., Silver, J. M., Bi, T. & Del’Haye, P. Spectral extension and synchronization of microcombs in a single microresonator. Nat. Commun. 11, (2020)

    2020

  43. [51]

    Moille, G. et al. Ultra-broadband Kerr microcomb through soliton spectral translation. Nat. Commun. 12, (2021)

    2021

  44. [52]

    Okawachi, Y . et al. Competition between Raman and Kerr effects in microresonator comb generation. Opt. Lett. 42, 2786 (2017)

    2017

  45. [53]

    Zhao, Y ., Liu, X., Yvind, K., Cai, X. & Pu, M. Widely-tunable, multi-band Raman laser based on dispersion-managed thin-film lithium niobate microring resonators. Commun. Phys. 6, 350 (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    Liu, Y . et al. Investigation of mode coupling in normal-dispersion silicon nitride microresonators for Kerr frequency comb generation. Optica 1, 137 (2014)

    2014

  47. [55]

    Ramelow, S. et al. Strong polarization mode coupling in microresonators. Opt. Lett. 39, 5134 (2014)

    2014

  48. [56]

    E., Lihachev, G., Kippenberg, T

    Lobanov, V . E., Lihachev, G., Kippenberg, T. J. & Gorodetsky, M. L. Frequency combs and platicons in optical microresonators with normal GVD. Opt. Express 23, 7713 (2015)

    2015

  49. [57]

    Fujii, S. et al. Analysis of Mode Coupling Assisted Kerr Comb Generation in Normal Dispersion System. IEEE Photonics J. 10, 1–11 (2018)

    2018

  50. [58]

    Nazemosadat, E. et al. Switching dynamics of dark-pulse Kerr frequency comb states in optical microresonators. Phys. Rev. A 103, 013513 (2021). 14

    2021

  51. [59]

    & Xue, X

    Yang, B., Li, S., Zheng, X. & Xue, X. Modulational instability induced by mode perturbation in normal-dispersion microresonators. Phys. Rev. A 111, 033519 (2025)

    2025

  52. [60]

    Sanyal, S. et al. Nonlinear Dynamics of Coupled-Resonator Kerr Combs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 123801 (2025)

    2025

  53. [61]

    & Gelens, L

    Parra-Rivas, P., Gomila, D., Knobloch, E., Coen, S. & Gelens, L. Origin and stability of dark pulse Kerr combs in normal dispersion resonators. Opt. Lett. 41, 2402 (2016)

    2016

  54. [62]

    & Gelens, L

    Parra-Rivas, P., Knobloch, E., Gomila, D. & Gelens, L. Dark solitons in the Lugiato- Lefever equation with normal dispersion. Phys. Rev. A 93, 063839 (2016)

    2016

  55. [63]

    Parra-Rivas, P., Coulibaly, S., Clerc, M. G. & Tlidi, M. Influence of stimulated Raman scattering on Kerr domain walls and localized structures. Phys. Rev. A 103, 013507 (2021)

    2021

  56. [64]

    Macnaughtan, M., Erkintalo, M., Coen, S., Murdoch, S. & Xu, Y . Temporal characteristics of stationary switching waves in a normal dispersion pulsed-pump fiber cavity. Opt. Lett. 48, 4097 (2023)

    2023

  57. [65]

    Black, J. A. et al. Optical-parametric oscillation in photonic-crystal ring resonators. Optica 9, 1183 (2022)

    2022

  58. [66]

    Perez, E. F. et al. High-performance Kerr microresonator optical parametric oscillator on a silicon chip. Nat. Commun. 14, 242 (2023)

    2023

  59. [67]

    White, A. D. et al. Integrated passive nonlinear optical isolators. Nat. Photonics 17, 143– 149 (2023)

    2023

  60. [68]

    Xu, M. et al. Dual-polarization thin-film lithium niobate in-phase quadrature modulators for terabit-per-second transmission. Optica 9, 61 (2022)

    2022

  61. [69]

    Song, Y . et al. Integrated electro-optic digital-to-analog link for efficient computing and arbitrary waveform generation. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.04395 (2024). 15

    2024 doi arXiv

  62. [70]

    Li, Z. et al. Ultrashort dissipative Raman solitons in Kerr resonators driven with phase- coherent optical pulses. Nat. Photonics 18, 46–53 (2024)

    2024

  63. [71]

    & Chen, J

    Li, T., Wu, K., Zhang, X., Cai, M. & Chen, J. Experimental observation of stimulated Raman scattering enabled localized structure in a normal dispersion FP resonator. Optica 10, 1389 (2023)

    2023

  64. [72]

    Bruch, A. W. et al. Pockels soliton microcomb. Nat. Photonics 15, 21–27 (2021)

    2021

  65. [73]

    Lu, J. et al. Two-colour dissipative solitons and breathers in microresonator second- harmonic generation. Nat. Commun. 14, (2023)

    2023

  66. [74]

    Stokowski, H. S. et al. Integrated frequency-modulated optical parametric oscillator. Nature 627, 95–100 (2024)

    2024

  67. [75]

    & Yang, K

    Song, Y ., Hu, Y ., Lončar, M. & Yang, K. Hybrid Kerr-electro-optic frequency combs on thin-film lithium niobate. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.11669 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Rodrigues, C. C. et al. Cross-Polarized Stimulated Brillouin Scattering in Lithium Niobate Waveguides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 113601 (2025)

    2025

  69. [77]

    Fig. 3 path

    Wan, S. et al. Self-locked broadband Raman-electro-optic microcomb. Nat. Commun. 16, 4829 (2025). 16 Acknowledgements: We thank Prof. Federico Capasso, Prof. Stéphane Coen, Prof. Evelyn Hu, Prof. Stuart Murdoch, Prof. Victor Torres-Company, Dr. Guanhao Huang, Donald Witt, Dr. ...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.