Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Exponentially mixing flows with slow enhanced dissipation

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper constructs incompressible flows that are exponentially mixing uniformly in the diffusivity, yet whose dissipation time is as large as $O(1/\kappa)$, showing that exponential mixing alone does not force enhanced dissipation.

desk verdict First construction of exponentially mixing flows with saturated dissipation time, but the uniform mixing rate rests on a delegated Harris-to-mixing transfer that needs a written proof. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.21305 v2 pith:TNO7KIC6 submitted 2025-07-28 math.PR math.APmath.DS

William Cooperman , Gautam Iyer , Keefer Rowan , Seungjae Son This is my paper
classification math.PRmath.APmath.DS MSC 60J2535Q4976R05
keywords enhanceddissipationexponentialmixingpassivescalaradvection-diffusionequationrandomshearflowsHarristheoremLyapunovfunctiontime
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper constructs explicit incompressible velocity fields on the two-dimensional torus that are exponentially mixing, uniformly in the molecular diffusivity $\kappa$, yet whose dissipation time is of order $1/\kappa$ — the slowest possible rate, with no enhanced dissipation. The flows are built from randomly shifted horizontal and vertical shears whose amplitude is $O(1)$ but whose spatial oscillation scale is $O(\kappa)$. The construction shows that the known implication 'exponentially mixing and $C^1$ uniformly in $\kappa$ implies dissipation time $O(|\log \kappa|^2)$' cannot be weakened to $C^0$ regularity. A secondary contribution is a refined, explicit estimate for the dissipation time of any mixing flow with a possibly time-inhomogeneous mixing rate.

What carries the argument

The construction is a random alternation of horizontal and vertical shears on $\mathbb{T}^2$: at even time steps the velocity is a sum of $N_\kappa = \lceil 1/\kappa \rceil$ horizontal shear profiles $\varphi(N_\kappa(x_2 - \alpha_i))$ with independent random phase shifts, and at odd steps the same is done vertically. At each step at most three shear terms overlap, so the field is bounded in $L^\infty$ independent of $\kappa$, but its $C^1$ norm grows like $N_\kappa \sim 1/\kappa$. The absence of enhanced dissipation is proved by writing $u_\kappa = \nabla \cdot H_\kappa$ with $\|H_\kappa\|_{L^\infty} \leq C\kappa$ and using an energy estimate that forces the $L^2$ norm of any mean-zero solution to stay above a quarter of its initial value for times up to $C/\kappa$. Exponential mixing is proved by finding an explicit $\kappa$-independent Lyapunov function $V(x,y) = |x-y|_\infty^{-p}$ for the associated two-point random dynamical system and verifying Harris conditions with $\kappa$-dependent additive constant but $\kappa$-independent multiplicative constants; the resulting geometric ergodicity, combined with a Borel–Cantelli summation and stationary-in-time law, yields the deterministic estimate (1.5).

What would settle it

A concrete check is to simulate the two-point chain for the shear flow $u_\kappa$ with a fixed profile satisfying (A1)-(A2), e.g. $\varphi(x)=\sin(x)$, and estimate the ratio $\mathbb{E} V(\Phi_2(x),\Phi_2(y))/V(x,y)$ for pairs with $|x-y|_\infty \sim \kappa$ over many independent phase-shift realizations. If the ratio does not stay below a constant $\gamma<1$ independent of $\kappa$ as $\kappa\to 0$, the near-diagonal contraction (Lemma 3.2) -- and with it the $\kappa$-independent rate in Theorem 1.1 -- fails. Alternatively, computing the actual dissipation time for these fields at several small $\kappa$ and observing a decay faster than $C/\kappa$ would refute Proposition 2.2.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated as Theorem 1.1, is that for every sufficiently small diffusivity $\kappa$ there is a smooth divergence-free velocity field $u_\kappa$ on $\mathbb{T}^2$, uniformly bounded in $L^\infty$ and with $\|u_\kappa\|_{C^1} \leq F/\kappa$, such that the transport equation $\partial_t \phi + u_\kappa \cdot \nabla \phi = 0$ satisfies $\|\phi_{m+n}\|_{H^{-1}} \leq D(m^2+1) e^{-\gamma_1 n} \|\phi_m\|_{H^1}$ for all even integers $m,n$, with constants $D,\gamma_1$ independent of $\kappa$, while the advection-diffusion equation with diffusivity $\kappa$ has dissipation time $t^s_{\rm dis}(u_\kappa,\kappa) \geq C/\kappa$ for every starting time $s \geq 0$. In other words, exponential mixing by itself does not force enhanced dissipation; the missing ingredient in the prior $O(|\log\kappa|^2)$ bound is a uniform-in-$\kappa$ Lipschitz bound on the flow.

Load-bearing premise

The proof relies on the companion Harris-to-mixing transfer remaining valid when the drift constant and the minorizing measure in the Lyapunov conditions depend on $\kappa$; if that transfer required a uniformly bounded drift constant or a $\kappa$-independent minorizing measure, the stated $\kappa$-independent exponential mixing rate would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The dissipation time bound $t_{\rm dis}(u_\kappa,\kappa) \ge C/\kappa$ means these flows saturate the universal upper bound $\log 2/(\lambda_1 \kappa)$, showing that mixing and enhanced dissipation are logically independent properties.
  • Since the flows are $C^0$ but not $C^1$ uniformly in $\kappa$, Theorem 1.1 delimits the sharp regularity threshold for the known bound $t_{\rm dis} \leq C|\log \kappa|^2$ for exponentially mixing flows.
  • Rescaling time by $1/\sqrt{\kappa}$ gives a family with uniform $C^1$ bound but $\kappa$-dependent mixing rate proportional to $\sqrt{\kappa}$ whose dissipation time is still $\gtrsim 1/\kappa$, so the conjectured sharper bound $t_{\rm dis} \leq \gamma^{-1}|\log(C_\delta D/\kappa^{d/2+\delta})|$ cannot hold generally.
  • The dissipation-time estimates of Section 5 apply to any incompressible flow with a time-inhomogeneous mixing rate $h(s,t)$, providing explicit constants and improving the dependence on the mixing rate compared with previous results.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next experiment is to interpolate the shear amplitude between $O(1)$ and $O(1/\kappa)$: the near-diagonal contraction argument suggests a continuous family with dissipation times between $\kappa^{-1}$ and $|\log\kappa|^2$, clarifying how regularity controls the dissipation-mixing gap.
  • The explicit Lyapunov function may transfer to other random shear or periodic mixer constructions, giving $\kappa$-independent mixing rates in situations where previous non-constructive methods yield only $\kappa$-dependent exponents.
  • The energy-method lower bound via $W^{-1,\infty}$ smallness suggests a general principle: any flow that is $O(\kappa)$ in a negative Sobolev norm cannot enhance dissipation, so the search for boundary cases should focus on flows whose negative norms are larger than $O(\kappa)$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the relation between exponential mixing and enhanced dissipation for passive scalars advected by incompressible flows. For each small κ it constructs a time-dependent velocity field uκ on T² by randomly shifted horizontal and vertical shears with spatial scale of order κ. Theorem 1.1 asserts that uκ is uniformly L∞ bounded, has C¹ norm O(1/κ), mixes exponentially at integer times with constants D, γ1 independent of κ, and yet has dissipation time at least C/κ, so it exhibits no enhanced dissipation. The mixing half is proved by verifying Harris-type conditions for the two-point chain (Lemma 3.1) and then invoking a transfer argument from [CIS25] (Lemma 2.1). The no-enhanced-dissipation half is proved by a self-contained energy estimate under a W^{-1,∞} smallness condition (Proposition 2.2). The paper also proves Proposition 1.4 and Corollary 1.5, which give quantitative dissipation-time upper bounds for time-inhomogeneous mixing rates.

Significance. If the Harris-to-mixing transfer in Section 3.5 is made fully rigorous, the main result is significant: it would provide a family of exponentially mixing flows that are only C⁰ uniformly in κ and that do not enhance dissipation, separating exponential mixing from enhanced dissipation in the absence of uniform C¹ regularity. The construction is explicit, and the no-enhanced-dissipation half is clean and self-contained. The paper also improves the quantitative relation between mixing rates and dissipation times for time-inhomogeneous mixers, with explicit constants, and it highlights the role of time inhomogeneity in random mixing constructions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3.5, Lemma 2.1 and (2.3)–(2.4)] The κ-uniform exponential mixing claim in Theorem 1.1(2) is not established in a self-contained way. The proof of Lemma 2.1 simply says 'Following the proof of Lemma 3.2 in [CIS25]' and then asserts that the proof of Lemma 3.3 in [CIS25] 'will go through unchanged'. The Harris data are genuinely κ-dependent: the drift constant in (3.2) is Kκ = K1 κ^{-3p}, the minorizing measure in (3.3) is supported on the complement of a diagonal strip of width η/Nκ, and the weighted norm uses βκ = α κ^{3p}/(2K1), which tends to 0. The only κ-dependent quantities checked in (3.33) are ∥e_m∥_{βκ} ≤ 1 and ∫(1 + βκ V) dπ ≤ 2. A Harris-based spectral gap can depend on Kκ, Rκ, α, and the normalization or support of νκ; if the inequality immediately preceding (8.1) of [CIS25] depends on any of those in a non-uniform way, the rate γ1 may acquire κ-dependence and Theorem 1.1(2) would not follow. This is load-bearing because (1.5) is the mixing half of the main theorem. Please either reproduce the transfer argument with all κ-dependencies made explicit, or state and prove a Harris-to-mixing theorem with hypotheses that are verified here and with a spectral-gap constant independent of κ.
  2. [Section 3.4, inequalities (3.22)–(3.25) and Lemma 3.6] The small-set condition (3.3) is proved through a chain of claims, but parts of the chain are only sketched. In particular, the derivation of (3.25) uses 'the vertical shear case is similar to (3.22)' and a conditional-probability argument that is not written out in full, and Lemmas 3.4–3.6 repeatedly say that a case is 'similar' or 'can be handled similarly'. Since α in (3.3) enters the Harris data, a hidden κ-dependence in the constants c1, c2, or C(η,φ) would propagate to the exponential rate. The authors should spell out these cases or at least state explicitly why each constant is independent of κ.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 1.1, definition of t_dis] The displayed definition of t_dis contains a typo: 'ts_dis(uκ,κ) s def =' has an extraneous 's' that should be removed.
  2. [Theorem 1.1, item (1)] The uniformity quantifier is imprecise: the theorem concerns sufficiently small κ, but item (1) says the bound ∥uκ∥_{C¹} < F/κ holds for all κ > 0. Please align the quantifiers.
  3. [Section 4, proof of Proposition 2.2] The proof chooses φ0 = θ0 = e1 = sin(x1), but this function is not L²-normalized; the displayed inequalities ∥φ_t∥² = e^{-2κt} ≥ 3/4 and ∥w_t∥² ≤ 1/8 implicitly assume normalization. Please state the normalization explicitly or adjust the constants.
  4. [Lemma 3.2, Cases I and II] The proof says 'The other case ... is similar' and 'The second case can be handled similarly' in places where an additional independent phase shift is used. Please expand these steps so the probability estimates and the κ-independence of the constants are verifiable.
  5. [References] The entry [Sei23] duplicates [Sei22]; the two should be consolidated into a single reference.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular reduction; the only self-citation is the Harris-to-mixing transfer delegated to the authors' prior [CIS25], which is an independent published theorem with stated assumptions rather than a recapitulation of the target result.

full rationale

The paper's central construction is explicit: u_kappa is built from randomly shifted horizontal and vertical shears in (2.2), and the no-enhanced-dissipation statement (Theorem 1.1(3)) follows from Proposition 2.2, whose proof is a self-contained energy estimate using the skew-symmetric representation u = div H with ||H||_{L^inf} <= C kappa. That portion does not import any fitted quantity or prior result. The exponential mixing statement (Theorem 1.1(2)) rests on Lemma 2.1, whose proof first verifies Harris conditions in Lemma 3.1. Lemmas 3.2, 3.4, 3.5, and 3.6 are proved in the paper with an explicit kappa-independent Lyapunov function V = |x-y|^{-p} and explicit probability estimates. The only externally imported step is the transfer from Harris conditions to geometric ergodicity and exponential mixing, which is delegated to the authors' prior paper [CIS25]. Section 3.5 states: 'Following the proof of Lemma 3.2 in [CIS25]' and 'the proof of Lemma 3.3 in [CIS25] will go through unchanged,' after checking the kappa-dependence in (3.33) through ||e_m||_{beta_kappa} and int(1+beta_kappa V) dpi. This is a genuine self-citation by three of the four authors, and it is load-bearing for the kappa-independent rate gamma_1. However, [CIS25] is a published, parameter-free theorem with stated assumptions; it is not the target result of this paper, and its use is not a definitional or fitting circularity. The residual concern is a correctness gap: if the cited transfer actually requires a kappa-independent drift constant K_kappa or minorizing measure nu_kappa, or if other kappa-dependence enters the inequality preceding (8.1) of [CIS25], then Lemma 2.1 would not follow from the Harris conditions proved here. That is a risk about an omitted verification, not a demonstration that the derivation is equivalent to its inputs. There is no fitted input renamed as a prediction, no known result merely renamed, and no uniqueness theorem imported from the authors. The paper is therefore essentially self-contained against external benchmarks; the self-citation burden is real but small, giving a score of 2.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The construction introduces no new physical entities. The only tunable ingredients are the shear amplitude, the Lyapunov exponent, and small geometric constants, all chosen by hand to make the proofs work rather than fitted to data. The main imported ingredient is the Harris-to-mixing transfer from [CIS25], listed as an axiom because the paper only sketches its verification in the κ-dependent setting.

free parameters (4)
  • A (shear amplitude) = sufficiently large, independent of κ
    Chosen large enough for the probability lower bounds in Lemmas 3.4 and 3.5; no data is fitted.
  • p (Lyapunov exponent) = p in (0,1/12)
    Chosen to make the drift coefficients in Lemma 3.2 decay as κ→0; requires p<1/4 in Case I and p<1/12 in Case II.
  • η (small-set scale constant) = sufficiently small
    Chooses the sublevel set Rκ and the minorizing measure in the Harris small-set condition; enters Lemmas 3.3 through 3.6.
  • s* (near-diagonal neighborhood width) = sufficiently small
    Defines the neighborhood Δ(s*/Nκ) in the near-diagonal drift condition Lemma 3.2.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The shear profile φ is C3 and satisfies (A1): {φ'=0} is finite and {φ'=0}∩{φ''=0}=∅, and (A2): {φ''=0} is finite and {φ''=0}∩{φ'''=0}=∅.
    Used in Lemma 3.2 to control the probability of poor expansion through (3.10); the paper states these assumptions on φ in Section 2.1 before the construction.
  • domain assumption The random phase shifts α_m^i are independent and uniformly distributed on intervals [πi/Nκ, π(i+1)/Nκ].
    This randomization is built into the construction; stationarity in time and the probability lower bounds (3.22)-(3.24) all use this law.
  • ad hoc to paper The Harris-to-mixing transfer from [CIS25] remains valid when the minorizing measure and drift constant depend on κ in the stated way.
    Section 3.5 invokes Lemma 3.3 of [CIS25] without reproducing the proof; the κ-dependence of Kκ and νκ is the main modification claimed to be harmless.
  • standard math Poincaré inequality and standard Fourier and energy estimates for the advection-diffusion equation on the torus.
    Used throughout for dissipation-time bounds, including (1.2), Proposition 2.2, and the Fourier projectors in Proposition 1.4.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exponentially mixing flows with slow enhanced dissipation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TNO7KIC6

@misc{pith2026250721305,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exponentially mixing flows with slow enhanced dissipation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TNO7KIC6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.21305}
}
abstract

Consider a passive scalar which is advected by an incompressible flow $u$ and has small molecular diffusivity $\kappa$. Previous results show that if $u$ is exponentially mixing and $C^1$, then the dissipation time is $O(|\log \kappa|^2)$. We produce a family of incompressible flows which are $C^0$ and exponentially mixing, uniformly in $\kappa$; however have a dissipation time of order $1/\kappa$ (i.e. exhibits no enhanced dissipation). We also estimate the dissipation time of mixing flows, and obtain improved bounds in terms of the mixing rate with explicit constants, and allow for a time inhomogeneous mixing rate which is typical for random constructions of mixing flows.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Superexponential dissipation enhancement on $\mathbb{T}^d$

    math.AP 2025-09 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    For advection-diffusion on T^d there exist incompressible velocity fields and initial data whose L2 mass decays double exponentially in 2D, like e^{-Ct^2} in 3D, and superexponentially in 4D.

  2. Turbulent and intermittent phenomena in a universal total anomalous dissipator

    math.AP 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    An explicit incompressible flow on the 2-torus is constructed that simultaneously causes anomalous dissipation, Richardson dispersion, anomalous regularization, and spatial intermittency for every Hölder exponent below 1.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Albritton, R

    D. Albritton, R. Beekie, and M. Novack. Enhanced dissipation and H \" o rmander's hypoellipticity. J. Funct. Anal. , 283(3):Paper No. 109522, 38, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2022.109522

    work page arXiv 2022

  2. [2]

    Alberti, G

    G. Alberti, G. Crippa, and A. L. Mazzucato. Exponential self-similar mixing by incompressible flows. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 32(2):445--490, 2019. doi:10.1090/jams/913

    work page doi:10.1090/jams/913 2019

  3. [3]

    H. Aref. Stirring by chaotic advection. J. Fluid Mech. , 143:1--21, 1984. doi:10.1017/S0022112084001233

    doi:10.1017/s0022112084001233 1984

  4. [4]

    Anomalous diffusion by fractal homogenization

    S. Armstrong and V. Vicol. Anomalous diffusion by fractal homogenization, 2023, 2305.05048 http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.05048

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    G. K. Batchelor. Small-scale variation of convected quantities like temperature in turbulent fluid. I . G eneral discussion and the case of small conductivity. J. Fluid Mech. , 5:113--133, 1959

    work page 1959

  6. [6]

    Bedrossian, A

    J. Bedrossian, A. Blumenthal, and S. Punshon-Smith. Almost-sure enhanced dissipation and uniform-in-diffusivity exponential mixing for advection-diffusion by stochastic N avier- S tokes. Probab. Theory Related Fields , 179(3-4):777--834, 2021. doi:10.1007/s00440-020-01010-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s00440-020-01010-8 2021

  7. [7]

    Bedrossian, A

    J. Bedrossian, A. Blumenthal, and S. Punshon-Smith. Almost-sure exponential mixing of passive scalars by the stochastic N avier- S tokes equations. Ann. Probab. , 50(1):241--303, 2022. doi:10.1214/21-aop1533

    work page doi:10.1214/21-aop1533 2022

  8. [8]

    Bru\'e, M

    E. Bru\'e, M. Colombo, G. Crippa, C. De Lellis, and M. Sorella. Onsager critical solutions of the forced N avier- S tokes equations. Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. , 23(10):1350--1366, 2024. doi:10.3934/cpaa.2023071

    work page doi:10.3934/cpaa.2023071 2024

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Bedrossian and M

    J. Bedrossian and M. Coti Zelati. Enhanced dissipation, hypoellipticity, and anomalous small noise inviscid limits in shear flows. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 224(3):1161--1204, 2017. doi:10.1007/s00205-017-1099-y

    2017 doi

  2. [10]

    Blumenthal, M

    A. Blumenthal, M. Coti Zelati, and R. S. Gvalani. Exponential mixing for random dynamical systems and an example of P ierrehumbert. Ann. Probab. , 51(4):1559--1601, 2023. doi:10.1214/23-aop1627

    2023 doi

  3. [11]

    Burczak, L

    J. Burczak, L. S. Jr., and B. Wu. Anomalous dissipation and euler flows, 2024, 2310.02934 http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.02934 . ://arxiv.org/abs/2310.02934

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Colombo, G

    M. Colombo, G. Crippa, and M. Sorella. Anomalous dissipation and lack of selection in the obukhov-corrsin theory of scalar turbulence, 2022, 2207.06833 http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.06833

    2022 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Chatterjee and P

    S. Chatterjee and P. Diaconis. Speeding up M arkov chains with deterministic jumps. Probab. Theory Related Fields , 178(3-4):1193--1214, 2020. doi:10.1007/s00440-020-01006-4

    2020 doi

  6. [14]

    Christie, Y

    A. Christie, Y. Feng, G. Iyer, and A. Novikov. Speeding up L angevin dynamics by mixing, 2023, 2303.18168 http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.18168

    2023 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Coble and S

    D. Coble and S. He. A note on enhanced dissipation and taylor dispersion of time-dependent shear flows, 2023, 2309.15738 http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.15738

    2023 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Cooperman, G

    W. Cooperman, G. Iyer, and S. Son. A H arris theorem for enhanced dissipation, and an example of P ierrehumbert. Nonlinearity , 38(4):Paper No. 045027, 32, 2025. doi:10.1088/1361-6544/adc652

    2025 doi

  9. [17]

    Constantin, A

    P. Constantin, A. Kiselev, L. Ryzhik, and A. Zlato s . Diffusion and mixing in fluid flow. Ann. of Math. (2) , 168(2):643--674, 2008. doi:10.4007/annals.2008.168.643

    2008 doi

  10. [18]

    F. Chen, L. Lov\' a sz, and I. Pak. Lifting M arkov chains to speed up mixing. In Annual ACM S ymposium on T heory of C omputing ( A tlanta, GA , 1999) , pages 275--281. ACM, New York, 1999. doi:10.1145/301250.301315

    1999

  11. [19]

    S. Corrsin. On the spectrum of isotropic temperature fluctuations in an isotropic turbulence. J. Appl. Phys. , 22:469--473, 1951

    1951

  12. [20]

    Coti Zelati, G

    M. Coti Zelati, G. Crippa, G. Iyer, and A. L. Mazzucato. Mixing in incompressible flows: transport, dissipation, and their interplay. Notices Amer. Math. Soc. , 71(5):593--604, 2024

    2024

  13. [21]

    Coti Zelati and T

    M. Coti Zelati and T. D. Drivas. A stochastic approach to enhanced diffusion. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) , 22(2):811--834, 2021

    2021

  14. [22]

    Coti Zelati, M

    M. Coti Zelati, M. G. Delgadino, and T. M. Elgindi. On the relation between enhanced dissipation timescales and mixing rates. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 73(6):1205--1244, 2020. doi:10.1002/cpa.21831

    2020 doi

  15. [23]

    Coti Zelati and T

    M. Coti Zelati and T. Gallay. Enhanced dissipation and T aylor dispersion in higher-dimensional parallel shear flows, 2023, 2108.11192 http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.11192

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Coti Zelati and V

    M. Coti Zelati and V. Navarro-Fern\'andez. Three-dimensional exponential mixing and ideal kinematic dynamo with randomized ABC flows, 2024, 2407.18028 http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.18028 . ://arxiv.org/abs/2407.18028

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    T. D. Drivas, T. M. Elgindi, G. Iyer, and I.-J. Jeong. Anomalous dissipation in passive scalar transport. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 243(3):1151--1180, 2022. doi:10.1007/s00205-021-01736-2

    2022 doi

  18. [26]

    Damak, B

    M. Damak, B. Franke, and N. Yaakoubi. Accelerating planar O rnstein- U hlenbeck diffusion with suitable drift. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. , 40:4093, 2020. doi:10.3934/dcds.2020173

    2020 doi

  19. [27]

    Diaconis

    P. Diaconis. The M arkov chain M onte C arlo revolution. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) , 46(2):179--205, 2009. doi:10.1090/S0273-0979-08-01238-X

    2009 doi

  20. [28]

    Dolgopyat, V

    D. Dolgopyat, V. Kaloshin, and L. Koralov. Sample path properties of the stochastic flows. Ann. Probab. , 32(1A):1--27, 2004. doi:10.1214/aop/1078415827

    2004

  21. [29]

    T. M. Elgindi and K. Liss. Norm growth, non-uniqueness, and anomalous dissipation in passive scalars. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 248(6):Paper No. 120, 28, 2024. doi:10.1007/s00205-024-02056-x

    2024 doi

  22. [30]

    T. M. Elgindi, K. Liss, and J. C. Mattingly. Optimal enhanced dissipation and mixing for a time-periodic, L ipschitz velocity field on T ^2 . Duke Math. J. , 174(7):1209--1260, 2025. doi:10.1215/00127094-2024-0057

    2025 doi

  23. [31]

    T. M. Elgindi and A. Zlato s . Universal mixers in all dimensions. Adv. Math. , 356:106807, 33, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.aim.2019.106807

    2019

  24. [32]

    Y. Feng. Dissipation Enhancement by Mixing . ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 2019. Thesis (Ph.D.)--Carnegie Mellon University

    2019

  25. [33]

    Y. Feng, Y. Feng, G. Iyer, and J.-L. Thiffeault. Phase separation in the advective C ahn- H illiard equation. J. Nonlinear Sci. , 30(6):2821--2845, 2020. doi:10.1007/s00332-020-09637-6

    2020 doi

  26. [34]

    Y. Feng, B. Hu, and X. Xu. Dissipation enhancement for a degenerated parabolic equation. Commun. Math. Sci. , 21(1):173--193, 2023

    2023

  27. [35]

    Feng and G

    Y. Feng and G. Iyer. Dissipation enhancement by mixing. Nonlinearity , 32(5):1810--1851, 2019. doi:10.1088/1361-6544/ab0e56

    2019 doi

  28. [36]

    Y. Feng, A. L. Mazzucato, and C. Nobili. Enhanced dissipation by circularly symmetric and parallel pipe flows. Phys. D , 445:Paper No. 133640, 13, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.physd.2022.133640

    2023

  29. [37]

    Fannjiang, S

    A. Fannjiang, S. Nonnenmacher, and L. Wo owski . Dissipation time and decay of correlations. Nonlinearity , 17(4):1481--1508, 2004. doi:10.1088/0951-7715/17/4/018

    2004 doi

  30. [38]

    Y. Feng, B. Shi, and W. Wang. Dissipation enhancement of planar helical flows and applications to three-dimensional K uramoto- S ivashinsky and K eller- S egel equations. J. Differential Equations , 313:420--449, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jde.2021.12.029

    2022 doi

  31. [39]

    Furstenberg

    H. Furstenberg. Noncommuting random products. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , 108(3):377--428, 1963. ://www.jstor.org/stable/1993589

    1963

  32. [40]

    Fannjiang and L

    A. Fannjiang and L. Wo owski . Noise induced dissipation in L ebesgue-measure preserving maps on d -dimensional torus. J. Statist. Phys. , 113(1-2):335--378, 2003. doi:10.1023/A:1025787124437

    2003 doi

  33. [41]

    Hess-Childs and K

    E. Hess-Childs and K. Rowan. A universal total anomalous dissipator, 2025, 2501.18526 http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18526 . ://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18526

    2025 arXiv

  34. [42]

    G. Iyer, E. Lu, and J. Nolen. Using B ernoulli maps to accelerate mixing of a random walk on the torus. Quart. Appl. Math. , 82(2):359--390, 2024. doi:10.1090/qam/1668

    2024 doi

  35. [43]

    Iyer and H

    G. Iyer and H. Zhou. Quantifying the dissipation enhancement of cellular flows. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 55(6):6496--6516, 2023. doi:10.1137/22M1524576

    2023 doi

  36. [44]

    C. J. P. Johansson and M. Sorella. Anomalous dissipation via spontaneous stochasticity with a two-dimensional autonomous velocity field, 2024, 2409.03599 http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.03599 . ://arxiv.org/abs/2409.03599

    2024

  37. [45]

    L. Kelvin. A rectilinear motion of viscous fluid between two parallel plates. Phil. Mag. , 4:321--330, 1887

  38. [46]

    Kiselev, R

    A. Kiselev, R. Shterenberg, and A. Zlato s . Relaxation enhancement by time-periodic flows. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 57(5):2137--2152, 2008. doi:10.1512/iumj.2008.57.3349

    2008 doi

  39. [47]

    D. A. Levin and Y. Peres. Markov chains and mixing times . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2017. doi:10.1090/mbk/107. Second edition of [ MR2466937], With contributions by Elizabeth L. Wilmer, With a chapter on ``Coupling from the past'' by James G. Propp and Da...

    2017 doi

  40. [48]

    Lin, J.-L

    Z. Lin, J.-L. Thiffeault, and C. R. Doering. Optimal stirring strategies for passive scalar mixing. J. Fluid Mech. , 675:465--476, 2011. doi:10.1017/S0022112011000292

    2011 doi

  41. [49]

    C. J. Miles and C. R. Doering. Diffusion-limited mixing by incompressible flows. Nonlinearity , 31(5):2346, 2018. doi:10.1088/1361-6544/aab1c8

    2018 doi

  42. [50]

    Myers Hill, R

    J. Myers Hill, R. Sturman, and M. C. Wilson. Exponential mixing by orthogonal non-monotonic shears. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena , 434:133224, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.physd.2022.133224

    2022

  43. [51]

    A. M. Obukhov. Structure of temperature field in turbulent flow. Izv. Akad. Nauk. SSSR, Geogr. Geofiz , 13, 1949

    1949

  44. [52]

    R. T. Pierrehumbert. Tracer microstructure in the large-eddy dominated regime. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals , 4(6):1091--1110, 1994. doi:10.1016/0960-0779(94)90139-2

    1994 doi

  45. [53]

    C.-C. Poon. Unique continuation for parabolic equations. Comm. Partial Differential Equations , 21(3-4):521--539, 1996. doi:10.1080/03605309608821195

    1996 doi

  46. [55]

    C. Seis. Bounds on the rate of enhanced dissipation. Comm. Math. Phys. , 399(3):2071--2081, 2023. doi:10.1007/s00220-022-04588-3

    2023 doi

  47. [56]

    H. A. Stone, A. D. Stroock, and A. Ajdari. Engineering flows in small devices: Microfluidics toward a lab-on-a-chip. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. , 36:381--411, 2004. doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.36.050802.122124

    2004

  48. [57]

    Thiffeault

    J.-L. Thiffeault. Using multiscale norms to quantify mixing and transport. Nonlinearity , 25(2):R1--R44, 2012. doi:10.1088/0951-7715/25/2/R1

    2012 doi

  49. [58]

    Tao and M

    Z. Tao and M. Zworski. Optimal enhanced dissipation for contact A nosov flows. Nonlinearity , 38(4):Paper No. 045001, 9, 2025. doi:10.1088/1361-6544/adbb4b

    2025 doi

  50. [59]

    D. Wei. Diffusion and mixing in fluid flow via the resolvent estimate. Science China Mathematics , pages 1869--1862, 2019. doi:10.1007/s11425-018-9461-8

    2019 doi

  51. [60]

    Yao and A

    Y. Yao and A. Zlato s . Mixing and un-mixing by incompressible flows. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) , 19(7):1911--1948, 2017. doi:10.4171/JEMS/709

    1911 doi

  52. [61]

    A. Zlato s . Diffusion in fluid flow: dissipation enhancement by flows in 2 D . Comm. Partial Differential Equations , 35(3):496--534, 2010. doi:10.1080/03605300903362546

    2010 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.