Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 40 references

The conformal logarithmic Laplacian on the sphere: Yamabe-type problems and Sobolev spaces

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A derivative of the fractional Laplacian at order zero defines a conformal logarithmic Laplacian on the sphere, with explicit spectrum and fully classified weak Yamabe solutions.

desk verdict A genuinely new conformal operator with solid spectral theory and a clean bridge to R^N; the Hilbert-space appendix has a repairable gap, but the core results hold. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.21779 v2 pith:GMVLSIFY submitted 2025-07-29 math.AP math.DG

Juan Carlos Fernández , Alberto Saldaña This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath.DG MSC 35B3335R0135R1158J4058J7058J90
keywords conformallogarithmicLaplacianYamabe-typeproblemQ-curvatureSobolevspacestereographicprojectionweaksolutionscompactembedding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces the conformal logarithmic Laplacian on the round sphere, defined as the derivative of the conformal fractional Laplacian with respect to the order parameter at s=0, and shows it is an explicit singular integral operator. Its main claims are that spherical harmonics are its eigenfunctions with a digamma-function eigenvalue formula, that under stereographic projection it becomes the Euclidean logarithmic Laplacian plus a known logarithmic potential term, and that this correspondence is a one-to-one bridge between weak Yamabe-type equations on the sphere and in $\mathbb{R}^N$. To make the bridge work in the weak setting, the paper builds a Hilbert space $D_{\log}(\mathbb{R}^N)$ with a logarithmic weight, proves compact embedding into $L^2$, and then classifies all nonnegative weak solutions of the logarithmic Yamabe problem as an explicit family of shifted, scaled bumps. The upshot is a unified classification and a ready-made variational setting for logarithmic equations in unbounded domains.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the conformal logarithmic Laplacian $P^{\log}_g$, defined as the order-zero derivative of the conformal fractional Laplacian; it carries the argument by providing a single operator that is simultaneously spectral, conformally covariant, and connected to the Euclidean operator $L\Delta$. The stereographic identity $\iota(P^{\log}_g u) = L\Delta v - 2v\ln\phi$ is the bridge that transfers classification results between the sphere and $\mathbb{R}^N$. The functional framework is the Hilbert space $D_{\log}(\mathbb{R}^N)$, defined by the weighted norm with weight $\ln(e+|x|^2)$, whose weight belongs to the A2 Muckenhoupt class (a standard integrability condition for weighted $L^2$ theory) and which makes the norm positive, the embedding into $L^2$ compact, and the density of compactly supported functions available. These pieces combine to translate the sphere classification into the explicit family of solutions for the logarithmic Yamabe problem.

What would settle it

Compute $P^{\log}_g$ on any smooth function that is not a spherical harmonic and check whether it equals the singular integral in Theorem 1.1; alternatively, search for a nonnegative weak solution in $D_{\log}(\mathbb{R}^N)$ of the logarithmic Yamabe equation whose decay at infinity is not $|x|^{-N}$, which the displayed family forbids.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the operator $P^{\log}_g u(z) := \frac{d}{ds}\big|_{s=0} P^s_g u(z)$ is the explicit singular integral $c_N \int_{S^N} \frac{u(z)-u(\zeta)}{|z-\zeta|^N} dV_g(\zeta) + A_N u(z)$, with $c_N = \pi^{-N/2}\Gamma(N/2)$ and $A_N = 2\psi(N/2)$. Every spherical harmonic of Laplace eigenvalue $\lambda$ is an eigenfunction with eigenvalue $\varphi_N(\lambda) = 2\psi\big(\sqrt{\tfrac14(N-1)^2+\lambda}+\tfrac12\big)$, so the spectrum is completely described. Under stereographic projection $\iota$, the operator intertwines with the Euclidean logarithmic Laplacian through $\iota(P^{\log}_g u) = L\Delta v - 2v\ln\phi$, and it obeys the conformal law $P^{\log}_{\eta g}(\varphi) = \eta^{-N/4}P^{\log}_g(\eta^{N/4}\varphi) - \varphi\ln\eta$. For the associated Yamabe equation, the paper proves that weak solutions on the sphere and in $\mathbb{R}^N$ correspond one-to-one, and that every nonnegative nontrivial weak solution in $\mathbb{R}^N$ has the explicit form $v(x) = e^{\frac N4(A_N-\mu)}\big(\frac{2t}{t^2+|x-a|^2}\big)^{N/2}$ for some $t>0$ and $a\in\mathbb{R}^N$.

Load-bearing premise

The main classification rests on an imported result about weak solutions on the sphere whose definition of weak solution is assumed to match the one used here, and on a mollification density step that is not fully verified; if either assumption gives way, the classification and the Hilbert-space equivalence would need to be re-derived.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every nonnegative weak solution of the logarithmic Yamabe problem in $\mathbb{R}^N$ is now known explicitly, so existence and uniqueness questions reduce to checking the displayed family.
  • The spectrum of $P^{\log}_g$ is completely explicit, so linear equations involving the conformal logarithmic Laplacian on the sphere can be solved by spherical-harmonic expansion.
  • Spherical harmonics pulled back by $\iota$ give closed-form eigenfunctions of $L\Delta$ plus the potential $v\ln\phi^{-2}$, producing new explicit solutions of linear logarithmic equations in $\mathbb{R}^N$.
  • $D_{\log}(\mathbb{R}^N)$ supplies a compactly embedded Hilbert space for variational methods, so logarithmic nonlinear problems in unbounded domains can be attacked with standard tools.
  • The conformal law gives the logarithmic Q-curvature transformation and identifies the constant-Q-curvature conformal metrics, tying the classification to conformal geometry.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the derivation uses only the spectral and conformal structure of the fractional family, the same derivative-at-zero construction should produce explicit logarithmic analogues of higher-order conformal operators, each with a similar stereographic identity.
  • The explicit solution family is parameterized by the conformal group of the sphere, which suggests a uniqueness and stability picture for the logarithmic Yamabe problem analogous to the classical Yamabe case; the paper itself does not develop this.
  • The weight $\ln(e+|x|^2)$ being in the A2 class suggests the Hilbert-space construction should extend to other logarithmically growing weights; a direct test would be whether the norm equivalence and compact embedding persist for weights like $\ln(e+|x|^\alpha)$ with $\alpha\neq 2$.
  • The distinction from the heat-semigroup logarithmic Laplacian noted in the introduction points to a testable comparison: the two operators differ in spectrum, so explicit eigenfunctions on the sphere can serve as a benchmark separating the two notions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces the conformal logarithmic Laplacian on the sphere, defined as the derivative at s=0 of the conformal fractional Laplacian, and derives an explicit singular-integral representation (Theorem 1.1) with spherical-harmonic eigenfunctions and eigenvalues given by a digamma function. It establishes a stereographic identity relating this operator to the Euclidean logarithmic Laplacian (Proposition 1.3), proves a conformal transformation law (Proposition 1.6), and introduces a Hilbert space D_log(R^N) as the logarithmic counterpart of the homogeneous fractional Sobolev space (Theorems 1.5 and 3.17). Using this framework, the paper proves an equivalence between weak solutions of the logarithmic Yamabe problem on the sphere and on R^N (Theorem 1.7) and classifies nonnegative nontrivial weak solutions (Theorem 1.8) by invoking an external classification result. The central functional-analytic construction and the weak-solution bridge are load-bearing for the final classification.

Significance. If the results are correct, the paper provides a clean and explicit functional framework for logarithmic Yamabe-type problems, with an explicit spectral analysis and a stereographic correspondence that are of independent interest. The construction of D_log(R^N) with a compact embedding into L^2, the use of Pitt's inequality, and the transfer of classification results from the sphere to R^N are valuable contributions. The paper is careful with many constants and identities, and the main formulas (1.4), (1.10), and (3.19) are derived in detail. However, as written, the density proof in Appendix A contains a concrete error and an incomplete Muckenhoupt weight verification, and the weak formulation involving u ln|u| is not fully justified; these issues affect the rigor of the main theorems and require repair.

major comments (4)
  1. [Appendix A, Lemma A.3] The definition of k_n^2 is incorrect for the intended change of variables. The displayed definition k_n^2(y)=∫_{R^N}|x|^{-N/2}U_n(x+y,x)dx does not match the second term of ∫∫_Q V_ε U_n after setting z=x+y; the correct kernel is k_n^2(z)=∫_{R^N}|z-x|^{-N/2}U_n(x,z-x)dx (or an equivalent form). Consequently, the displayed weak-convergence argument V_ε⇀V in L^2(Q) is not valid as written, and the conclusion E(v_ε−v,v_ε−v)→0 does not follow. Since Lemma A.3 underpins Proposition A.4 and hence the density statement in Theorem 3.17(1) (and Theorem 1.5(1)), the density of C_c^∞ in D_log(R^N) is formally unproved. This is a repairable but load-bearing gap.
  2. [Appendix A, Lemma A.2] The proof of the A2 condition for w(x)=ln(e+|x|^2) checks the Muckenhoupt product only for balls centered at the origin. The A2 condition requires a uniform bound over all balls in R^N, not just B(0,r). Although the claim w∈A2 is true, the proof as written does not establish it. This matters because the last step of Lemma A.3, namely the L^2 convergence of the weighted term ∫(v_ε−v)^2 ln(e+|x|^2)dx, is delegated to the A2 theory in [38, Theorem 2.1.4]. A covering or doubling argument is needed to justify the reduction to centered balls.
  3. [Section 4, weak formulations (1.21) and (1.22)] The paper defines weak solutions of the logarithmic Yamabe problem but does not justify that the nonlinear term u ln|u| (resp. v ln|v|) pairs with all test functions in H(S^N) (resp. D_log(R^N)). For u∈H(S^N), finiteness of ∫ u ln|u| φ for every φ∈H(S^N) requires an estimate such as ∫ |u|^2 ln|u| < ∞ or a logarithmic Sobolev bound; no such justification is given. Since Theorem 1.7 and Theorem 1.8 are stated for weak solutions, this missing verification leaves the formulation only formal. A short lemma using Beckner's log-Sobolev inequality (or a truncation argument) should be added.
  4. [Theorem 1.8 and the paragraph preceding it] The classification of weak solutions relies on [26, Theorem 1], but the paper does not verify that the solution notion in [26] coincides exactly with the H(S^N) weak formulation used here. In particular, [26, Theorem 1] is quoted for solutions of (1.23); if the weak-solution notion there differs from the present definition, the transfer via Theorem 1.7 would not apply. The authors should state the definition of weak solution in [26] and confirm that it matches (1.21) with μ=A_N, or alternatively provide a self-contained argument that the hypotheses of [26] are met.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The text contains a typo: 'Caffarelli-Sivestre' should be 'Caffarelli-Silvestre'.
  2. [Reference [16]] The reference format is inconsistent: 'arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.04797, 44 (2019), pp. 1100–1139' mixes an arXiv identifier with volume and page numbers from a different publication. This should be corrected.
  3. [Section 3, Theorem 3.17 proof] The completeness of D_log(R^N) is asserted after the density argument, but the proof would be clearer if it directly showed that a Cauchy sequence converges in the weighted L^2 space and that the energy term is lower semicontinuous, as is implicit. The current sentence 'This yields that D_log(R^N) is complete' is terse.
  4. [Section 2, proof of Proposition 1.2] In the final sentence of the proof, the phrase 'it is, in fact, somewhat simpler since the sphere is a compact manifold' is vague; the continuity argument should be sketched or cited more explicitly rather than deferred entirely.
  5. [Appendix A, Lemma A.1 and Lemma A.3] The notation k_n^1, k_n^2 is typeset inconsistently (e.g., 'k n 1' with a space), and the definition of U_n could be stated more cleanly. These are presentation issues.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main classification is imported from an external theorem [26], the spectral and intertwining facts are also backed by the external reference [21], and the functional framework is constructed by explicit estimates rather than by fitting.

full rationale

The paper's central claims do not reduce to their inputs. Theorem 1.1 derives the singular integral expression and eigenvalues of P^log_g by differentiating the standard conformal fractional Laplacian P^s_g; the eigenvalue formula (2.5) is explicitly attributed to both the external survey [21] and the authors' own [9], so the self-citation is not load-bearing. Proposition 1.3 and Proposition 1.6 are direct asymptotic computations from the fractional intertwining law (2.9), again cited to [21] as well as [9]. The Hilbert space D_log(R^N) is constructed with an explicit norm whose choice is verified by Pitt's inequality and by the A2-weight argument; the constant κ is introduced only to make a quadratic form positive definite and cancels in the final statements. The classification Theorem 1.8 rests on the external theorem [26, Theorem 1] by Frank-König-Tang, not on any result derived in this paper, and the bridge Theorem 1.7 is a stereographic change of variables. There are no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, and no uniqueness or ansatz is imported solely from the authors' prior work. The appendices contain repairable technical gaps (the A2 check in Lemma A.2 is stated only for balls centered at the origin, and Lemma A.3 has a suspicious kernel definition), but these are correctness concerns about the density proof, not circularity: the density claim is not assumed as an input and is not used to define the target results. Therefore the paper is not circular in the sense of this review.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The paper's main new objects are the operator P^log_g and the space D_log(R^N); both are explicitly constructed and their properties proven. The results rest on standard external tools (spectral formula for P^s_g, Pitt's inequality, Muckenhoupt weight theory, and the classification in [26]). Only one arbitrary constant κ is chosen by hand. No fitted data parameters appear.

free parameters (1)
  • κ (norm constant)
    Chosen with κ > |2ψ(N/4)| in (1.18) to make the H(S^N) and D(R^N) norms positive definite. The value is arbitrary and the theory is independent of it (Remark 3.13).
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Eigenvalue formula φ_{N,s}(λ) = Γ(1/2+s+√(λ+((N-1)/2)^2)) / Γ(1/2-s+√(λ+((N-1)/2)^2)) for the conformal fractional Laplacian P^s_g on S^N.
    Used in the proof of Theorem 1.1(ii); cited to [9, Lemma 2.6] and [21]. Classical result in conformal geometry.
  • standard math Pitt's inequality: E_L(v,v) + ∫ ln(|x|^2)|v|^2 dx ≥ a_N ||v||^2_{L^2} (Proposition 3.11, cited to [5]).
    Used to prove positive definiteness of the D(R^N) norm (Remark 3.13) and in Theorem 3.17 for boundedness of E_L.
  • domain assumption Classification of nonnegative weak solutions of (1.23) from [26, Theorem 1], including the parametrization θ(a,b) of the solution family.
    Imported in the proof of Theorem 1.8. The paper does not verify that the weak solution notion in [26] coincides with the H(S^N) weak formulation used here, but this is an external theorem.
  • standard math The weight w(x)=ln(e+|x|^2) is an A2 Muckenhoupt weight (Lemma A.2), so convolution mollification converges in the weighted L^2 norm (from [38]).
    Used in the density proof of C^∞_c in D_log(R^N), Proposition A.4.
invented entities (2)
  • Conformal logarithmic Laplacian P^log_g on S^N independent evidence
    purpose: New conformally covariant singular integral operator, derivative of P^s_g at s=0, used to define logarithmic Q-curvature and Yamabe-type problems.
    Explicit formula (1.4) and spectral characterization (Theorem 1.1) give mathematical consequences that can be checked independently.
  • Hilbert space D_log(R^N) independent evidence
    purpose: Functional framework for weak solutions of logarithmic Laplacian equations in unbounded domains, compactly embedded into L^2.
    Theorem 1.5 gives a Hilbert space structure, density of C^∞_c, and compact embedding, so the entity is fully defined.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The conformal logarithmic Laplacian on the sphere: Yamabe-type problems and Sobolev spaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GMVLSIFY

@misc{pith2026250721779,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The conformal logarithmic Laplacian on the sphere: Yamabe-type problems and Sobolev spaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GMVLSIFY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.21779}
}
abstract

We study the conformal logarithmic Laplacian on the sphere, an explicit singular integral operator that arises as the derivative (with respect to the order parameter) of the conformal fractional Laplacian at zero. Our analysis provides a detailed investigation of its spectral properties, its conformal invariance, and the associated \(Q\)-curvature problem. Furthermore, we establish a precise connection between this operator on the sphere and the logarithmic Laplacian in \(\mathbb{R}^N\) via stereographic projection. This correspondence bridges classification results for two Yamabe-type problems previously studied in the literature, extending one of them to the weak setting. To this end, we introduce a Hilbert space that serves as the logarithmic counterpart of the homogeneous fractional Sobolev space, offering a natural functional framework for the variational study of logarithmic-type equations in unbounded domains.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [17]

    Chen, Logarithmic Laplacian on general Riemannian manifolds , arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.19311, (2025)

    R. Chen, Logarithmic Laplacian on general Riemannian manifolds , arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.19311, (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  2. [26]

    R. L. Frank, T. K¨onig, and H. Tang, Classification of solutions of an equation related to a conformal log Sobolev inequality, Advances in Mathematics, 375 (2020), p. 107395

    work page 2020

  3. [1]

    Alzer, On some inequalities for the gamma and psi functions , Mathematics of computations, 66 (1997), pp

    H. Alzer, On some inequalities for the gamma and psi functions , Mathematics of computations, 66 (1997), pp. 373– 389

    work page 1997

  4. [2]

    Angeles and A

    F. Angeles and A. Salda˜na, Small order limit of fractional Dirichlet sublinear-type problems , Fractional Calculus and Applied Analysis, 26 (2023), pp. 1594–1631

    work page 2023

  5. [3]

    Arora, J

    R. Arora, J. Giacomoni, and A. V aishnavi , The Brezis-Nirenberg and logistic problem for the logarithmic Laplacian, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.18907, (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  6. [4]

    Beckner, Sobolev inequalities, the Poisson semigroup, and analysis on the sphere sn., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 89 (1992), pp

    W. Beckner, Sobolev inequalities, the Poisson semigroup, and analysis on the sphere sn., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 89 (1992), pp. 4816–4819

    work page 1992

  7. [5]

    1897–1905

    , Pitt’s inequality and the uncertainty principle , Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 123 (1995), pp. 1897–1905

    work page 1995

  8. [6]

    , Logarithmic Sobolev inequalities and the existence of singular integrals , Forum Math., 9 (1997), pp. 303–323. 25

    work page 1997

Show all 40 references
  1. [7]

    Brasco, D

    L. Brasco, D. G ´omez-Castro, and J. L. V ´azquez, Characterisation of homogeneous fractional Sobolev spaces , Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations, 60 (2021), p. 60

    2021

  2. [8]

    S.-Y. A. Chang and M. d. M. Gonz ´alez, Fractional Laplacian in conformal geometry , Adv. Math., 226 (2011), pp. 1410–1432

    2011

  3. [9]

    H. A. Chang-Lara, J. C. Fern ´andez, and A. Salda ˜na, Fractional q-curvature on the sphere and optimal partitions, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.16882, (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  4. [10]

    H. A. Chang-Lara and A. Salda ˜na, Classical solutions to integral equations with zero order kernels , Mathema- tische Annalen, 389 (2024), pp. 1463–1515

    2024

  5. [11]

    Chen, On m-order logarithmic Laplacians and the applications , Analysis and Applications, (2025), pp

    H. Chen, On m-order logarithmic Laplacians and the applications , Analysis and Applications, (2025), pp. 1–43

    2025

  6. [12]

    H. Chen, D. Hauer, and T. Weth , An extension problem for the logarithmic Laplacian , arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.15689, (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  7. [13]

    Chen and L

    H. Chen and L. V ´eron, Bounds for eigenvalues of the Dirichlet problem for the logarithmic Laplacian , Advances in Calculus of Variations, 16 (2023), pp. 541–558

    2023

  8. [14]

    , The Cauchy problem associated to the logarithmic Laplacian with an application to the fundamental solution , Journal of Functional Analysis, 287 (2024), p. 110470

    2024

  9. [15]

    Chen and T

    H. Chen and T. Weth, The Dirichlet problem for the logarithmic Laplacian , Communications in Partial Differential Equation, (2024)

    2024

  10. [16]

    Chen and F

    H. Chen and F. Zhou , On positive solutions of critical semilinear equations involving the logarithmic Laplacian , arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.04797, 44 (2019), pp. 1100–1139

    2019 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Clapp, J

    M. Clapp, J. C. Fern ´andez, and A. Salda ˜na, Critical polyharmonic systems and optimal partitions. , Commu- nications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 20 (2021)

    2021

  12. [19]

    Clapp, A

    M. Clapp, A. Salda˜na, and A. Szulkin, Phase separation, optimal partitions, and nodal solutions to the Yamabe equation on the sphere , International Mathematics Research Notices, 2021 (2021), pp. 3633–3652

    2021

  13. [20]

    Correa and A

    E. Correa and A. De Pablo , Nonlocal operators of order near zero. , Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 461 (2018), p. 837 – 867

    2018

  14. [21]

    del Mar Gonz ´alez, Recent Progress on the Fractional Laplacian in Conformal Geometry , De Gruyter Open Poland, Warsaw, Poland, 2017, pp

    M. del Mar Gonz ´alez, Recent Progress on the Fractional Laplacian in Conformal Geometry , De Gruyter Open Poland, Warsaw, Poland, 2017, pp. 236–273

    2017

  15. [22]

    B. Dyda, S. Jarohs, and F. Sk , The Dirichlet problem for the logarithmic p-Laplacian , arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.11181, (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  16. [23]

    P. A. Feulefack and S. Jarohs , Nonlocal operators of small order , Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata (1923-), 202 (2023), pp. 1501–1529

    2023

  17. [24]

    P. A. Feulefack, S. Jarohs, and T. Weth , Small order asymptotics of the Dirichlet eigenvalue problem for the fractional Laplacian, Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications, 28 (2022), p. 18

    2022

  18. [25]

    Frank, E

    R. Frank, E. Lieb, and R. Seiringer , Hardy-Lieb-Thirring inequalities for fractional Schr¨ odinger operators , Journal of the American Mathematical Society, 21 (2008), pp. 925–950

    2008

  19. [27]

    M. d. M. Gonz ´alez Nogueras and J. Qing , Fractional conformal Laplacians and fractional Yamabe problems , Analysis & PDE, 6 (2013), pp. 1535–1576

    2013

  20. [28]

    C. R. Graham, R. Jenne, L. J. Mason, and G. A. J. Sparling, Conformally invariant powers of the Laplacian. I. Existence, J. London Math. Soc. (2), 46 (1992), pp. 557–565. 26

    1992

  21. [29]

    C. R. Graham and M. Zworski , Scattering matrix in conformal geometry , Invent. Math., 152 (2003), pp. 89–118

    2003

  22. [30]

    I. W. Herbst , Spectral theory of the operator (p2 + m2)1/2 − Ze 2/r, Communications in Mathematical Physics, 53 (1977), pp. 285–294

    1977

  23. [31]

    Hern ´andez-Santamar´ıa, S

    V. Hern ´andez-Santamar´ıa, S. Jarohs, A. Salda ˜na, and L. Sinsch , FEM for 1D-problems involving the logarithmic Laplacian: error estimates and numerical implementation , Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 192 (2025), pp. 189–211

    2025

  24. [32]

    Hern ´andez-Santamar´ıa, L

    V. Hern ´andez-Santamar´ıa, L. F. L. R ´ıos, and A. Salda ˜na, Optimal boundary regularity and a Hopf-type lemma for Dirichlet problems involving the logarithmic Laplacian , Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 45 (2025), pp. 1–36

    2025

  25. [33]

    Hern´andez Santamar´ıa and A

    V. Hern´andez Santamar´ıa and A. Salda˜na, Small order asymptotics for nonlinear fractional problems, Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations, 61 (2022), p. 92

    2022

  26. [34]

    Jarohs, A

    S. Jarohs, A. Salda ˜na, and T. Weth , Differentiability of the nonlocal-to-local transition in fractional Poisson problems, Potential Analysis, (2024), pp. 1–23

    2024

  27. [35]

    Jarohs, A

    S. Jarohs, A. Salda˜na, and T. Weth, A new look at the fractional Poisson problem via the logarithmic Laplacian , Journal of Functional Analysis, 279 (2020), p. 108732

    2020

  28. [36]

    Laptev and T

    A. Laptev and T. Weth , Spectral properties of the logarithmic Laplacian , Analysis and Mathematical Physics, 11 (2021), p. 133

    2021

  29. [37]

    Pollastro and N

    L. Pollastro and N. Soave, Antisymmetric maximum principles and hopf ’s lemmas for the logarithmic laplacian, with applications to symmetry results , Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata (1923-), (2025), pp. 1–19

    2025

  30. [38]

    B. O. Turesson, Nonlinear Potential Theory and Weighted Sobolev Spaces, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2000

    2000

  31. [39]

    Weiyue, On a conformally invariant elliptic equation on Rn, Commun

    D. Weiyue, On a conformally invariant elliptic equation on Rn, Commun. Math. Phys, 107 (1986), pp. 331–335

    1986

  32. [40]

    Yafaev, Sharp constants in the Hardy–Rellich inequalities , Journal of Functional Analysis, 168 (1999), pp

    D. Yafaev, Sharp constants in the Hardy–Rellich inequalities , Journal of Functional Analysis, 168 (1999), pp. 121– 144. Juan Carlos F ern´ andez Departamento de Matem´ aticas, Facultad de Ciencias Universidad Nacional Aut´ onoma de M´ exico Circuito Exterior, Ciudad Universit...

    1999

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.