Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Strong-coupling and high-bandwidth cavity electro-optic modulation for advanced pulse-comb synthesis

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that cavity electro-optic modulation can be described by one exponential coupling term even beyond the weak-drive limit, predicting multi-pulse combs, pump-detuning tolerance, and machine-learned flat spectra.

desk verdict A genuinely new strong-coupling EO comb model with a useful phase diagram, but the high-bandwidth claims rest on a discrete-time assumption that the paper should justify more carefully; still deserves a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.21855 v2 pith:E3XUAZCZ submitted 2025-07-29 physics.optics physics.app-ph

Tianqi Lei , Yunxiang Song , Yanyun Xue , Qihuang Gong , Marko Lončar , Yaowen Hu This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph
keywords cavityelectro-opticmodulationfrequencycombsstrongcouplinghigh-bandwidthsyntheticdimensionmachinelearninginversedesignthin-filmlithiumniobatepulse-combsynthesis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to show that cavity electro-optic modulation remains a usable engine for pulse and comb synthesis even when the microwave drive is so strong and so fast that it sweeps across many cavity resonances. The standard model, which couples each optical frequency mode only to its nearest neighbors, breaks down there; the paper replaces it with an exponential coupling term that automatically couples every mode to every other mode. With that term, a single microwave tone produces multiple pulses per modulation period (two, six, or ten depending on drive strength), and once drive strength and pump detuning satisfy a threshold condition, comb generation no longer requires the pump to sit exactly on a resonance. The paper further shows that high-bandwidth drive waveforms sculpt the comb through the band structure of the synthetic frequency lattice, and that machine-learning-designed drives can flatten an electro-optic comb to about 200 lines with 0.03 dB/line slope. If these predictions hold, cavity EO combs become programmable, detuning-tolerant sources for communications, computing, and quantum optics.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the exponential coupling term $g(t)=i f_R(e^{i\Omega(t)/f_R}-1)$ evaluated once per cavity round trip. It treats the whole round-trip phase modulation as a discrete stroboscopic step, so a large phase excursion in a single step produces all harmonics of the modulation and hence couplings between modes separated by any number of free spectral ranges. In the small-drive limit it reduces to the familiar $g(t)=\Omega\cos\omega t$; in the strong-drive limit its Bessel-function expansion yields the equations of motion whose solution gives the pulse number, comb envelope, and synthetic band structure. This term is what carries every result in the paper: multi-pulse generation, detuning robustness, waveform-dependent band shaping, and machine-learned spectral flattening.

What would settle it

Drive a high-FSR microcavity (for example, FSR near 3 GHz) with a single microwave tone at $\Omega \simeq 2.85 \omega_R$ and record the through-port output: this model predicts ten pulses per modulation period and an oscillating comb envelope rather than the conventional two pulses and a triangular dB-scale envelope. Seeing only the standard weak-drive behavior at that drive strength would falsify the model; alternatively, scanning pump detuning at $\Omega = 0.5 \omega_R$ and finding a surviving pump-insulation gap would falsify the detuning-robustness claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the conventional nearest-neighbor coupling $g(t)=\Omega\cos\omega t$ is only the small-drive limit of the exact discrete-time coupling $g(t)=i f_R(e^{i\Omega(t)/f_R}-1)$, where $f_R$ is the cavity round-trip frequency and $\Omega(t)$ is the phase-modulation amplitude. Expanding this exponential in Bessel functions couples mode $n$ to every mode $n+m$, so a single-tone drive already creates long-range jumps between frequency modes once $\Omega$ approaches $f_R$. The paper derives the resulting equations of motion and uses them to map out a phase diagram in pump detuning and drive strength, finding two-, six-, and ten-pulse regimes as $\Omega$ crosses successive multiples of $f_R$, and full pump conduction when $\Omega+|\Delta|>f_R$. It then extends the coupling to arbitrary waveforms $\Omega(t)$, connects the comb envelope to the synthetic-frequency band structure, and demonstrates machine-learning inverse design of flat combs using high-bandwidth drives plus a detuning-induced frequency boundary. The authors treat this as a property of the electro-optic coupling itself, assuming $\chi^{(3)}$, thermal, and dispersion effects are unchanged from the weak-coupling regime.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes that the entire round-trip phase modulation can be collapsed into one discrete coupling step, even when the microwave waveform changes faster than the cavity round-trip time; it also assumes that thermal, $\chi^{(3)}$, and dispersion effects are identical in the weak- and strong-coupling regimes, so all new dynamics are attributed to the electro-optic coupling term alone.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single-tone strong drive between one and two free spectral ranges should produce six pulses per modulation period, and between two and three free spectral ranges, ten pulses, with the comb envelope becoming periodic instead of triangular.
  • Once $\Omega+|\Delta|>f_R$, electro-optic comb generation works for arbitrary pump detuning, which would remove the need for precise pump-resonance locking in cavity EO combs.
  • High-bandwidth arbitrary waveforms directly control the synthetic-frequency band structure, enabling programmable dispersion and, potentially, actively controlled topological and non-Hermitian photonic behavior.
  • Machine-learning inverse design combined with a detuning-induced frequency boundary produces a flat-top comb of about 200 lines at 0.03 dB/line slope under the same total microwave power as a single-tone comb, a tenfold flatness improvement.
  • The sparse coupled-mode formulation scales as $O(N)$ with the number of modes, making optimization practical in the high-bandwidth regime where transfer-matrix approaches become expensive.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the exponential-coupling form implies that modulation waveforms with the same integrated round-trip phase should generate the same comb, so electrode geometry would enter only through the effective $\Omega(t)$; this is a testable design rule the paper does not state.
  • The paper mentions quantum applications only briefly; if the all-order couplings survive at the few-photon level, they would produce multi-mode entangled sideband states beyond the pairwise interactions of standard models, which could be checked in a photon-correlation experiment.
  • The $\Omega+|\Delta|>f_R$ conduction threshold resembles a tunable metal-insulator transition in the synthetic lattice; a natural extension is to search for boundary-localized or chiral transport when $\Omega$ is swept through $f_R$ in a finite frequency lattice.
  • Detuning-tolerant pumping also suggests operation with an unlocked or multi-color pump laser; the paper gestures at this but does not characterize the resulting comb's coherence or noise properties.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper proposes a universal framework for cavity electro-optic (EO) modulation in the regime where the EO coupling strength Ω and the microwave modulation bandwidth ω_BW both exceed the cavity free spectral range ω_R. The central object is a coupling function g(t)=i f_R(e^{iΩ(t)/f_R}−1) in a frequency-lattice Hamiltonian, which reduces to the conventional nearest-neighbor coupling Ω cos ωt in the weak-coupling limit. From this model the authors derive a phase diagram with a strong-coupling threshold Ω+|Δ|>ω_R for arbitrary pump detuning Δ, predict multi-pulse time-domain operation and pump-detuning-robust comb generation, connect the higher-order dynamics to overlapping synthetic-frequency bands, and use machine-learning inverse design to compute microwave waveforms that produce flat combs (about 200 lines with 0.03 dB/line slope). The manuscript also claims agreement with a companion experiment (ref 32) for the strong-coupling regime.

Significance. If correct, the framework would replace the tight-binding nearest-neighbor description of cavity EO combs with a more general model that captures long-range couplings under strong drive, and it would open the high-bandwidth regime to systematic comb and pulse design. The phase-diagram threshold Ω+|Δ|>ω_R is a concrete, falsifiable prediction, and the companion experiment cited as ref 32 provides independent support for the strong-coupling part. The machine-learning inverse-design demonstrations are a practical strength, although they are optimization results rather than independent predictions. The main open question is whether the discrete-time, lumped-kick treatment remains quantitatively valid when ω_BW≫ω_R; the paper currently provides no derivation or numerical check of that limit.

major comments (4)
  1. [Results, Framework for strong-coupling and high-bandwidth cavity EO modulation] The text states that g(t) is obtained from an integral of the local dielectric perturbation across the modulation region and then sets g(t)=i f_R(e^{iΩ(t)/f_R}−1) for arbitrary waveforms. This is a lumped-kick model: it assumes the phase imprinted on the field at round-trip n is determined by the instantaneous value of Ω(t) at the modulator crossing time. The manuscript does not state this assumption, nor does it give the validity condition in terms of the modulator transit time relative to 1/ω_BW, nor an estimate of intra-round-trip corrections when ω_BW≫ω_R. Because the high-bandwidth results in Figs. 3 and 4 rely on this replacement, the derivation should be supplied together with a numerical comparison against a continuous-time model.
  2. [Results, Framework for strong-coupling and high-bandwidth cavity EO modulation, equation of motion] The displayed equation ∂a_n/∂T = ... has no explicit time dependence, but the Hamiltonian term g(t)Σ_m(a_{n+m}^† a_n + h.c.) with g(t)=i f_R(e^{iβ cosωt}−1) contains factors e^{imωt} for each m. The rotating frame and the resonance condition ω=ω_R that remove these factors are not specified. Without this information it is difficult to verify the weak-coupling reduction and to apply the model to the detuned drives (δ_MW≠0) used in Fig. 4. Please state the frame transformation and the conditions on ω and δ_MW.
  3. [Results, High-bandwidth EO modulation-induced comb and band structure shaping; Fig. 4] The flat-comb demonstration (200 lines, 0.03 dB/line) and the arbitrary-waveform band structures (Fig. 3) are presented as consequences of the framework in the ω_BW≫ω_R regime. Since the validity of the lumped-kick model in that regime is not established, these results are not yet fully supported. A comparison with a sub-round-trip or continuous-time simulation, or an experimental demonstration specifically in the high-bandwidth regime (the companion experiment ref 32 validates strong coupling but is not cited as demonstrating ω_BW≫ω_R), would close this gap.
  4. [Results, Framework for strong-coupling and high-bandwidth cavity EO modulation] The statement that χ(3), thermal, and dispersion effects 'remain the same in weak and strong-coupling regime' is asserted without argument. Strong coupling changes the intracavity field distribution and the number of excited modes, so these effects need not be identical. Since this assumption underlies the attribution of all new dynamics to the EO coupling, please provide a justification or explicitly identify it as a simplifying assumption to be tested.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] Ω(t) for arbitrary waveforms is used without a definition of its relation to the modulation index β or the physical phase shift; define it explicitly, for example as the instantaneous modulation depth in angular-frequency units.
  2. [Fig. 4c] The '3 dB-bandwidth about 200 lines' should be stated as the number of comb lines within 3 dB of the peak, together with the corresponding optical frequency span.
  3. [Fig. 2e] The 'slight offset' between the simulated and theoretical threshold is attributed to finite loss; please quantify this offset for the parameters used.
  4. [Introduction] The text contains a typo ('as result, t he rich dynamics'); the manuscript should be proofread.
  5. [Data and code availability] The data and code availability statements say 'available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request'; consider providing a repository link to improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the central Hamiltonian derivation is self-contained, with one minor non-load-bearing companion self-citation.

  1. other [Results, 'Strong-coupling EO modulation-induced unconventional EO comb and pulse synthesis', first paragraph (also Discussion: 'Such a framework agrees well with our experimental observations32')]
    "This effect is also observed in our recent experiment32, further highlighting the significance of our proposed modeling framework for modulation in strong-coupling and high-bandwidth regime."

    Ref 32 is a companion preprint by overlapping authors (arXiv:2507.21835) used as experimental validation of the central strong-coupling multi-pulse effect. If that experiment is modeled with the same Hamiltonian, the agreement is self-consistent rather than independent. However, the paper does not fit any parameter to ref 32, and the theoretical predictions (Bessel couplings, phase-diagram threshold, band-overlap picture) follow from the stated Hamiltonian alone, so the self-citation is not load-bearing. This is a minor self-citation flag, not a reduction of the derivation to its inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained: the coupling g(t)=i f_R(e^{i beta cos omega t}-1) is obtained from the round-trip phase-modulation map (e^{i phi(t)}-1)/t_R, and the equations of motion follow from its Bessel expansion. No fitted parameter is later renamed as a prediction. The phase-diagram threshold Omega+|Delta|>omega_R is an analytical band-overlap condition stated with a finite-loss offset, not a fit to data. The machine-learning flat-comb results are explicitly inverse design (optimizing a waveform to a target spectrum), not predictions from the model, so they do not constitute circularity. The high-bandwidth validity of the lumped round-trip map is an assumption and a correctness risk, not a circular step, because the manuscript does not derive sub-round-trip corrections. The only self-referential element is the citation of companion preprint ref 32 as experimental agreement; that corroboration is not load-bearing since the model, phase diagram, and simulations stand on the stated Hamiltonian. Overall: no significant circularity; minor non-load-bearing self-citation only.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation relies on standard Bessel-function math, the stated discrete-time phase-modulation Hamiltonian, and two domain assumptions: the validity of the round-trip discretization at high bandwidth, and the claim that non-EO cavity effects do not change with drive strength. There are no fitted hidden parameters in the core model, but the ML inverse design fits the drive waveform to a target comb shape, which is a design optimization rather than a prediction. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • EO modulation strength Omega = 0.25-2.85 x omega_R (Fig. 2)
    Operating-point parameter scanned to explore phase diagram; chosen by the authors to illustrate regimes, not fitted to external data.
  • pump detuning Delta = 0, +/-omega_R/2
    Simulation parameter varied to study detuning robustness; a physical input.
  • microwave bandwidth omega_BW = 2 pi x 30 GHz for ML flat comb
    Chosen to represent an accessible arbitrary waveform generator bandwidth; not fitted to data.
  • microwave detuning delta_MW = 22 MHz for ML flat comb
    Parameter used to create frequency boundary; value selected for the demonstrated flat comb.
  • cavity loss kappa = not numerically specified in main text
    Input parameter of the model; the threshold offset in Fig. 2e is attributed to finite loss, but the value is not given in the main text.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Bessel-function expansion of the phase-modulation exponential e^{i beta cos omega t} = sum_m i^m J_m(beta) e^{i m omega t}
    Used to derive coupling to all orders in the equations of motion; standard mathematical identity.
  • domain assumption The cavity EO modulation Hamiltonian with discrete-time round-trip coupling and g(t) = i f_R(e^{i Omega(t)/f_R} - 1)
    Stated in the Results 'Framework' section as the starting point of the model; it abstracts the electrode structure into a phase-modulation black box.
  • ad hoc to paper Discrete-time round-trip approximation remains valid when modulation bandwidth exceeds the FSR (omega_BW >> omega_R)
    The paper treats the round-trip as a single phase kick per t_R even for high-bandwidth drives, but does not derive corrections for intra-round-trip modulation variations; this is the load-bearing enabling assumption for the high-bandwidth extension.
  • domain assumption Other cavity effects (chi(3), thermal, dispersion) are identical in weak and strong coupling regimes
    Stated in Results: 'these effects remain the same in weak and strong-coupling regime since the weak/strong coupling is determined by the microwave modulation strength.' This is required for attributing all new dynamics to the EO coupling term.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Strong-coupling and high-bandwidth cavity electro-optic modulation for advanced pulse-comb synthesis." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/E3XUAZCZ

@misc{pith2026250721855,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Strong-coupling and high-bandwidth cavity electro-optic modulation for advanced pulse-comb synthesis},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/E3XUAZCZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.21855}
}
read the original abstract

Cavity electro-optic (EO) modulation plays a pivotal role in optical pulse and frequency comb synthesis, supporting a wide range of applications including communication, computing, ranging, and quantum information. The ever-growing demand for these applications has driven efforts in enhancing modulation coupling strength and bandwidth towards advanced pulse-comb synthesis. However, the effects of strong-coupling and high-bandwidth cavity EO modulation remain underexplored, due to the lack of a general, unified model that captures this extreme condition. In this work, we present a universal framework for pulse-comb synthesis under cavity EO modulation, where coupling strength and modulation bandwidth far exceed the cavity's free spectral range (FSR). We show that, under such intense and ultrafast driving conditions, EO-driven frequency combs and pulses exhibit rich higher-order nonlinear dynamics, including temporal pulse compression and comb generation with arbitrary pump detuning. Leveraging this framework, we reveal a direct link between the higher-order dynamics of EO pulse-comb generation and the band structure of synthetic dimension. Furthermore, we demonstrate arbitrary comb shaping via machine-learning-based inverse microwave drive design, achieving a tenfold enhancement in cavity electro-optic comb flatness by exploring the synergistic effects of high-bandwidth driving and detuning-induced frequency boundaries. Our findings push cavity electro-optic modulation into a new frontier, unlocking significant potential for universal and machine-learning-programmable electro-optic frequency combs, topological photonics, as well as photonic quantum computing in the strong-coupling and high-bandwidth regimes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Universal dynamics and microwave control of programmable cavity electro-optic frequency combs

    physics.optics 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Resonant electro-optic combs on lithium niobate exhibit modulation-depth-dependent multi-pulse states and can be spectrally shaped with multi-harmonic microwave drives.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    & Millot, G

    Parriaux, A., Hammani, K. & Millot, G. Electro -optic frequency combs. Adv. Opt. Photonics 12, 223 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Carlson, D. R. et al. Ultrafast electro-optic light with subcycle control. Science 361, 1358– 1363 (2018)

    2018

  3. [3]

    Ho, K. -P. & Kahn, J. M. Optical frequency comb generator using phase modulation in amplified circulating loop. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 5, 721–725 (1993)

    work page 1993

  4. [4]

    Zhang, M. et al. Broadband electro -optic frequency comb generation in a lithium niobate microring resonator. Nature 568, 373–377 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Hu, Y . et al. High-efficiency and broadband on-chip electro-optic frequency comb generators. Nat. Photonics 16, 679–685 (2022)

    2022

  6. [6]

    & Vahala, K

    Yang, Q.-F., Hu, Y ., Torres-Company, V . & Vahala, K. Efficient microresonator frequency combs. eLight 18 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Fundamentals of Coherent Optical Fiber Communications

    Kikuchi, K. Fundamentals of Coherent Optical Fiber Communications. J. Light. Technol. 34, 157–179 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Marin-Palomo, P. et al. Microresonator-based solitons for massively parallel coherent optical communications. Nature 546, 274–279 (2017)

    2017

Show all 78 references
  1. [9]

    Lukens, J. M. et al. All-Optical Frequency Processor for Networking Applications. J. Light. Technol. 38, 1678–1687 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    Yoo, S. J. B. Wavelength conversion technologies for WDM network applications. J. Light. Technol. 14, 955–966 (1996)

    1996

  3. [11]

    Xu, X. et al. 11 TOPS photonic convolutional accelerator for optical neural networks. Nature 589, 44–51 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    Feldmann, J. et al. Parallel convolutional processing using an integrated photonic tensor core. Nature 589, 52–58 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    Wang, K., Dutt, A., Wojcik, C. C. & Fan, S. Topological complex -energy braiding of non - Hermitian bands. Nature 598, 59–64 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    Wang, K. et al. Generating arbitrary topological windings of a non -Hermitian band. Science 371, 1240–1245 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Dutt, A. et al. A single photonic cavity with two independent physical synthetic dimensions. Science 367, 59–64 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    & Fan, S

    Yuan, L., Lin, Q., Xiao, M. & Fan, S. Synthetic Dimension in Photonics. Optica 5, 1396 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    & Bowers, J

    Chang, L., Liu, S. & Bowers, J. E. Integrated optical frequency comb technologies. Nat. Photonics 16, 95–108 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    A., Vahala, K

    Diddams, S. A., Vahala, K. & Udem, T. Optical frequency combs: Coherently uniting the electromagnetic spectrum. Science 369, eaay3676 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    Zhang, J. et al. Quantum internet using code division multiple access. Sci. Rep. 3, 2211 (2013)

    2013

  12. [20]

    Kues, M. et al. Quantum optical microcombs. Nat. Photonics 13, 170–179 (2019)

    2019

  13. [21]

    L., Weiner, A

    Lu, H.-H., Liscidini, M., Gaeta, A. L., Weiner, A. M. & Lukens, J. M. Frequency-bin photonic quantum information. Optica 10, 1655 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    C., Flammia, S

    Menicucci, N. C., Flammia, S. T. & Pfister, O. One-Way Quantum Computing in the Optical Frequency Comb. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 130501 (2008)

    2008

  15. [23]

    Hu, Y . et al. Integrated electro-optics on thin-film lithium niobate. Nat. Rev. Phys. 7, 237–254 (2025)

    2025

  16. [24]

    Karpov, M. et al. Dynamics of soliton crystals in optical microresonators. Nat. Phys. 15, 1071– 1077 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    C., Lamb, E

    Cole, D. C., Lamb, E. S., Del’Haye, P., Diddams, S. A. & Papp, S. B. Soliton crystals in Kerr resonators. Nat. Photonics 11, 671–676 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    Li, G. et al. Ring Resonator Modulators in Silicon for Interchip Photonic Links. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 19, 95–113 (2013)

    2013

  19. [27]

    Li, G. et al. 25Gb/s 1V-driving CMOS ring modulator with integrated thermal tuning. Opt. Express 19, 20435 (2011)

    2011

  20. [28]

    Hu, Y . et al. On-chip electro-optic frequency shifters and beam splitters. Nature 599, 587–593 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    Zhang, M. et al. Electronically programmable photonic molecule. Nat. Photonics 13, 36–40 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    Herrmann, J. F. et al. Mirror symmetric on-chip frequency circulation of light. Nat. Photonics 16, 603–608 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    Hu, Y . et al. Mirror-induced reflection in the frequency domain. Nat. Commun. 13, 6293 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Universal dynamics and microwave control of programmable cavity electro- optic frequency combs

    Yunxiang Song et al. Universal dynamics and microwave control of programmable cavity electro- optic frequency combs. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.21835 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Dutt, A. et al. Experimental band structure spectroscopy along a synthetic dimension. Nat. Commun. 10, 3122 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    & Loncar, M

    Hu, Y ., Reimer, C., Shams-Ansari, A., Zhang, M. & Loncar, M. Realization of high - dimensional frequency crystals in electro-optic microcombs. Optica 7, 1189 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    Lustig, E. et al. Photonic topological insulator in synthetic dimensions. Nature 567, 356–360 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    G., Wade, P

    Senanian, A., Wright, L. G., Wade, P. F., Doyle, H. K. & McMahon, P. L. Programmable large- scale simulation of bosonic transport in optical synthetic frequency lattices. Nat. Phys. 19, 1333–1339 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    Balčytis, A. et al. Synthetic dimension band structures on a Si CMOS photonic platform. Sci. Adv. 8, eabk0468 (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    M., Goldman, N., Zilberberg, O

    Ozawa, T., Price, H. M., Goldman, N., Zilberberg, O. & Carusotto, I. Synthetic dimensions in integrated photonics: From optical isolation to four-dimensional quantum Hall physics. Phys. Rev. A 93, 043827 (2016)

    2016

  31. [39]

    & Segev, M

    Lustig, E. & Segev, M. Topological photonics in synthetic dimensions. Adv. Opt. Photonics 13, 426 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    Dutt, A. et al. Creating boundaries along a synthetic frequency dimension. Nat. Commun. 13, 3377 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    & Kahn, J

    Buscaino, B., Zhang, M., Loncar, M. & Kahn, J. M. Design of Efficient Resonator -Enhanced Electro-Optic Frequency Comb Generators. J. Light. Technol. 38, 1400–1413 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    Zhu, D. et al. Spectral control of nonclassical light pulses using an integrated thin-film lithium niobate modulator. Light Sci. Appl. 11, 327 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    Peng, B. et al. Parity–time-symmetric whispering-gallery microcavities. Nat. Phys. 10, 394– 398 (2014)

    2014

  36. [44]

    Song, W. et al. Breakup and Recovery of Topological Zero Modes in Finite Non -Hermitian Optical Lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 165701 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    Li, G. et al. Direct extraction of topological Zak phase with the synthetic dimension. Light Sci. Appl. 12, 81 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    & Lončar, M

    Song, Y ., Hu, Y ., Zhu, X., Yang, K. & Lončar, M. Octave-spanning Kerr soliton frequency combs in dispersion - and dissipation-engineered lithium niobate microresonators. Light Sci. Appl. 13, 225 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    J., Holzwarth, R

    Kippenberg, T. J., Holzwarth, R. & Diddams, S. A. Microresonator-Based Optical Frequency Combs. Science 332, 555–559 (2011)

    2011

  40. [48]

    Ye, H. et al. Electro-optic comb pumped optical parametric oscillator with flexible repetition rate at GHz level. Opt. Lett. 46, 1652 (2021)

    2021

  41. [49]

    Wang, Y . et al. Toward ultimate -efficiency frequency conversion in nonlinear optical microresonators. C E N C E V N C E S (2025)

    2025

  42. [50]

    Lin, Y . et al. Efficient second-harmonic generation of quasi-bound states in the continuum in lithium niobate thin film enhanced by Bloch surface waves. Nanophotonics 13, 2335–2348 (2024)

    2024

  43. [51]

    Butler, H. J. et al. Using Raman spectroscopy to characterize biological materials. Nat. Protoc. 11, 664–687 (2016)

    2016

  44. [52]

    Ozeki, Y . et al. High-speed molecular spectral imaging of tissue with stimulated Raman scattering. Nat. Photonics 6, 845–851 (2012)

    2012

  45. [53]

    Wan, S. et al. Self-locked broadband Raman-electro-optic microcomb. Nat. Commun. 16, 4829 (2025)

    2025

  46. [54]

    Del’Haye, P. et al. Optical frequency comb generation from a monolithic microresonator. Nature 450, 1214–1217 (2007)

    2007

  47. [55]

    Levy, J. S. et al. CMOS-compatible multiple -wavelength oscillator for on -chip optical interconnects. Nat. Photonics 4, 37–40 (2010)

    2010

  48. [56]

    Sun, S. et al. Integrated optical frequency division for microwave and mmWave generation. Nature 627, 540–545 (2024)

    2024

  49. [57]

    Long, J. et al. A chip-based optoelectronic-oscillator frequency comb. eLight 5, (2025)

    2025

  50. [58]

    Nie, B. et al. Soliton microcombs in X-cut LiNbO3 microresonators. eLight (2025)

    2025

  51. [59]

    Guo, Q. et al. Ultrafast mode-locked laser in nanophotonic lithium niobate. Science 382, 708– 713 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    Wen, H. et al. Few-mode fibre-optic microwave photonic links. Light Sci. Appl. 6, e17021– e17021 (2017)

    2017

  53. [61]

    Yang, K. Y . et al. Multi-dimensional data transmission using inverse -designed silicon photonics and microcombs. Nat. Commun. 13, 7862 (2022)

    2022

  54. [62]

    Wang, N. et al. Laser2 : A two-domain photon-phonon laser. Sci. Adv. 9, eadg7841 (2023)

    2023

  55. [63]

    Liu, H. et al. Ultra-compact lithium niobate photonic chip for high -capacity and energy - efficient wavelength-division-multiplexing transmitters. Light Adv. Manuf. 4, 1 (2023)

    2023

  56. [64]

    Song, Y . et al. Integrated electro -optic digital -to-analog link for efficient computing and arbitrary waveform generation. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.04395 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Hu, Y . et al. Integrated lithium niobate photonic computing circuit based on efficient and high- speed electro-optic conversion. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.02734 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Zheng, Y . et al. Electro-optically programmable photonic circuits enabled by wafer -scale integration on thin-film lithium niobate. Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033206 (2023)

    2023

  59. [67]

    Lin, Z. et al. 120 GOPS Photonic tensor core in thin-film lithium niobate for inference and in situ training. Nat. Commun. 15, 9081 (2024)

    2024

  60. [68]

    Zheng, Y . et al. Multichip multidimensional quantum networks with entanglement retrievability. Science 381, 221–226 (2023)

    2023

  61. [69]

    Li, J., Yi, X., Lee, H., Diddams, S. A. & Vahala, K. J. Electro-optical frequency division and stable microwave synthesis. Science 345, 309–313 (2014)

    2014

  62. [70]

    Newman, Z. L. et al. Architecture for the photonic integration of an optical atomic clock. Optica 6, 680 (2019)

    2019

  63. [71]

    Feng, H. et al. Integrated lithium niobate microwave photonic processing engine. Nature 627, 80–87 (2024)

    2024

  64. [72]

    & Capmany, J

    Marpaung, D., Yao, J. & Capmany, J. Integrated microwave photonics. Nat. Photonics 13, 80– 90 (2019)

    2019

  65. [73]

    Bai, B. et al. Microcomb-based integrated photonic processing unit. Nat. Commun. 14, 66 (2023)

    2023

  66. [74]

    Holzgrafe, J. et al. Cavity electro-optics in thin-film lithium niobate for efficient microwave- to-optical transduction. Optica 7, 1714 (2020)

    2020

  67. [75]

    McKenna, T. P. et al. Cryogenic microwave -to-optical conversion using a triply resonant lithium-niobate-on-sapphire transducer. Optica 7, 1737 (2020)

    2020

  68. [76]

    & Tang, H

    Han, X., Fu, W., Zou, C.-L., Jiang, L. & Tang, H. X. Microwave -optical quantum frequency conversion. Optica 8, 1050 (2021)

    2021

  69. [77]

    Warner, H. K. et al. Coherent control of a superconducting qubit using light. Nat. Phys. 21, 831–838 (2025)

    2025

  70. [78]

    Youssefi, A. et al. A cryogenic electro -optic interconnect for superconducting devices. Nat. Electron. 4, 326–332 (2021). Figure 1 | Strong-coupling and high -bandwidth cavity EO modulation . a, Schematic of cavity EO modulation with arbitrary modulation strength and bandwidt...

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.