Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 50 references

Symbiotic stars in Galactic open clusters

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read CQ Dra is argued to be the first confirmed symbiotic star with an open-cluster age anchor, around 2.5 Gyr old.

desk verdict Plausible first symbiotic star in an open cluster, but the age anchor rests on eye-fit isochrones and unverified membership. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.21994 v1 pith:6HRMT6U7 submitted 2025-07-29 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA

Lukas Kue{ss} (1) , Ernst Paunzen (2) ((1) Department of Astrophysics , University of Vienna , Austria , (2) Department of Theoretical Physics , Astrophysics , Faculty of Science , Masaryk University
show 2 more authors
Brno Czechia)
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.GA
keywords symbioticstarsopenclustersCQDraHSC1224GaiaDR3astrometryisochroneagesclustermembershipyoungstellarobjects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Symbiotic stars are interacting binaries whose ages are hard to measure because reddening and their composite spectra corrupt standard field-star age methods. The paper tries to bypass the problem by finding symbiotic stars inside Galactic open clusters, where all members share one age and metallicity. Matching the most recent symbiotic catalogues to a Gaia DR3 open-cluster catalogue yields seven candidates, and the authors argue that one confirmed symbiotic star, CQ Dra, is a true member of the old open cluster HSC 1224, placing it on the giant branch at log t ≈ 9.4 (about 2.5 Gyr). If correct, this supplies the first open-cluster age anchor for a confirmed symbiotic star and a concrete test point for binary evolution models. The other six candidates mostly fail membership checks on colour-magnitude diagrams, and two seem to be young stellar objects rather than symbiotic stars.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is cluster-membership analysis via Gaia DR3 astrometry combined with isochrone fitting. The authors cross-match the Merc et al. symbiotic catalogue against the Hunt and Reffert open-cluster catalogue, apply the matching limits of Prišegen et al. to identify additional cluster members, and build colour-magnitude diagrams with PARSEC isochrones (Bressan et al., 2012). The named device is the CMD position: a star whose colour and magnitude fall on the cluster's giant branch at an isochrone age is read as a member with that age. The SED tool VOSA is used to test whether infrared excess marks a symbiotic star or a young stellar object.

What would settle it

Measure CQ Dra's radial velocity and compare it to the mean radial velocity of HSC 1224 members; a difference larger than the cluster's internal velocity dispersion would falsify membership. A second decisive check is Gaia DR4 astrometry: if the updated parallax moves CQ Dra off the cluster distance of about 145 pc, the age anchor fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that CQ Dra, previously confirmed as a symbiotic binary through X-ray spectroscopy, is a genuine member of the nearby open cluster HSC 1224. The authors match Gaia DR3 positions, proper motions, and parallaxes to the cluster catalogue, add two new giant members (HD 40325 and HD 73131) to HSC 1224, and find CQ Dra sitting on the cluster's red giant branch where the PARSEC isochrones give log t ≈ 9.4. They emphasize that HSC 1224 also contains three white dwarfs and possible blue stragglers, consistent with an old cluster. On this evidence, CQ Dra becomes the first confirmed symbiotic star whose age is anchored by an open cluster rather than estimated from the field, and the cluster's statistical metallicity can further constrain its evolutionary state. The paper is careful to limit the claim: the other six candidates are not established members, and the authors flag that Gaia astrometry for extended binaries with nebulae can be unreliable.

Load-bearing premise

The Gaia parallax and proper motion for CQ Dra are accurate enough to confirm it belongs to HSC 1224, even though CQ Dra's surrounding nebula and binary motion can bias such measurements.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • CQ Dra's age of about 2.5 Gyr becomes a direct test of symbiotic binary evolution, requiring the cool giant's mass-loss history and the white dwarf's accretion over that time to match the observed X-ray and nebular properties.
  • The HSC 1224 age and metallicity can be adopted as CQ Dra's own, converting a field object with poorly known reddening into a cluster-calibrated object.
  • Because HDBSCAN-based cluster detection can be overconfident, some rare-object cluster memberships in current catalogues are false, and independent astrometric and photometric checks are needed before use.
  • Several symbiotic stars may be missed as cluster members because Gaia parallaxes are unreliable for extended binaries, and the upcoming Gaia DR4 should refine or reveal such memberships.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A confirmed cluster age for CQ Dra would let modelers ask whether symbiotic binaries like it can delay Type Ia supernova explosions by more than a gigayear, an implication the paper does not develop beyond its population-level SN Ia discussion.
  • The same matching logic could be applied to other rare evolved binaries with cool giants, such as barium stars or R Coronae Borealis stars, to give them cluster-based ages where field methods fail.
  • If CQ Dra's parallax is biased, the age anchor could be an illusion, but the cluster HSC 1224 itself is real; a targeted radial-velocity campaign or high-angular-resolution imaging that separates the nebula from the star would resolve the ambiguity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper cross-matches the catalogues of symbiotic stars and Galactic open clusters to identify candidate host clusters, and it reports seven candidates. For each candidate it inspects the colour–magnitude diagram and, where relevant, the spectral energy distribution to judge whether the object is a genuine cluster member or a young stellar object. The central positive claim is that the confirmed symbiotic star CQ Dra 'seems to be a true member' of the nearby open cluster HSC 1224 and that its position on the giant branch indicates log t ≈ 9.4, i.e. an age of roughly 2.5 Gyr. The other six candidates are argued to be doubtful members, misclassified young objects, or hosts that are themselves uncertain. The paper is written as a short research letter and is candid about the limitations of the Gaia astrometry for extended, nebulous binaries.

Significance. If the claim for CQ Dra and HSC 1224 is correct, it would provide the first open-cluster age anchor for a symbiotic star, a valuable constraint for evolutionary models of these binaries. The paper also usefully demonstrates that naive matching of symbiotic-star and cluster catalogues produces a high rate of false positives, and the SED-based check for young stellar object contamination is a good practice. The authors are appropriately cautious in framing the central result as 'seems to be a true member' and in stating the possible unreliability of Gaia astrometry for extended systems. However, the significance is conditional: the membership and the age are not yet established with the quantitative rigour needed to support a first-of-its-kind age determination.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results, CQ Dra paragraph; Table 1] No quantitative astrometric evidence is presented that CQ Dra is a member of HSC 1224. The matching procedure is described only as a cross-match with Hunt and Reffert (2023) plus the Prisegen et al. (2021) limits, but no membership probability, parallax, or proper motion is given for CQ Dra or for the cluster. Given the paper's own warning in Conclusions and Outlook that Gaia parallax and proper-motion measurements for extended objects and binaries can be unreliable, the reader cannot rule out that CQ Dra is a foreground or background giant. A table listing the Gaia astrometry, the membership probability, and, if available, a radial velocity is needed to support the membership claim.
  2. [Results, CQ Dra paragraph; Fig. 2] The age log t ≈ 9.4 is not independently established. Hunt and Reffert (2023) list HSC 1224 with 7.74 < log t < 8.38, yet the paper replaces this with ≈9.4 using a colour–magnitude diagram in which CQ Dra itself lies on the 9.4 isochrone and in which the giant branch is defined by two newly identified K giants (HD 40325 and HD 73131) whose membership is not demonstrated, since no probabilities, parallaxes, or radial velocities are provided. This creates a circularity: the object whose age is being determined is also used to anchor the isochrone that yields that age. An independent main-sequence turn-off fit of cluster members, with membership probabilities, is required.
  3. [Results, CQ Dra paragraph; Fig. 2] Quantitative uncertainties are missing for the reddening, distance, and isochrone placement. The value E(BP−RP) = 0.072 mag is stated without a derivation or an error estimate, and the isochrone placement appears to be done by eye; the turn-off is acknowledged as difficult to determine, while the three white dwarfs and two blue stragglers are mentioned only qualitatively. Consequently, the resulting age log t ≈ 9.4 has no error bars. For a claimed first age anchor of a symbiotic star, an isochrone fit with uncertainties on the cluster parameters is needed.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption refers to the host cluster as 'HSC 1244', whereas the text and Table 1 consistently use 'HSC 1224'; this typo should be corrected.
  2. [Introduction] The word 'crusial' in the second paragraph should be 'crucial'.
  3. [Target Selection] The sentence 'We took all established, likely, and suspected Galactic symbiotic stars from the recent version of the catalogue by Merc et al. (2019)' should specify the catalogue version or access date, since the database is continuously updated.
  4. [Throughout] The notation log t should include the units, e.g. log(age/yr), to avoid ambiguity.
  5. [Results, L W Cas paragraph] The phrase 'the host open clusters do not show any turn-off point' mixes singular and plural; the intended reference should be clarified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the CQ Dra age is an isochrone reading, not a recycled fit, and the self-cited matching method is not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's chain of inference is not circular. The symbiotic-star list (Merc et al. 2019), the cluster member list and membership probabilities (Hunt and Reffert 2023), and the Gaia DR3 astrometry are external inputs; none of the paper's conclusions is substituted back into these inputs. For CQ Dra, membership in HSC 1224 is argued from Gaia astrometric matching, and only subsequently is the CMD used to estimate the cluster age. The value log t ≈ 9.4 is read from the position of CQ Dra and two independently classified K giants (HD 40325 and HD 73131) relative to Bressan et al. (2012) isochrones, with white dwarfs and blue stragglers used as qualitative support; it is not a fitted parameter that is later relabelled as a prediction. The matching limits of Prisegen et al. (2021), which include one of the present authors, are used to add members, but the central membership claim for CQ Dra is based on the Hunt and Reffert (2023)/Gaia cross-match, and the two K giants are supporting rather than forced evidence. The paper explicitly concedes that Gaia astrometry for extended binaries may be unreliable and that the turn-off point is difficult to determine (Conclusions and Outlook; Results section for CQ Dra); these are accuracy and robustness caveats, not circularity. The fact that the catalog age of HSC 1224 (7.74 < log t < 8.38) is replaced by a CMD-based older value is a weakness in the independence of the age anchor, but it is a scientific-evidence concern, not a self-referential derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. The age result rests on adopted reddening and distance, plus an implicit single-star interpretation of a composite binary. The ledger lists these inputs and the background assumptions.

free parameters (2)
  • Reddening E(BP-RP) of HSC 1224 = 0.072 mag
    Adopted from synthetic photometry (Gaia Collaboration et al. 2023a) to deredden the CMD. The derived giant-branch age depends on this value, and no uncertainty is quoted.
  • Distance to HSC 1224 = 145 pc
    Adopted from Hunt and Reffert (2023). Used to place CQ Dra on the absolute-magnitude CMD. If the cluster distance is wrong, the isochrone age shifts.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption All members of an open cluster share a common age and metallicity.
    Standard assumption stated in the Introduction with reference to Dias et al. (2021).
  • domain assumption The Gaia DR3 member lists of Hunt and Reffert (2023) are reliable enough for cross-matching, except where specific counter-evidence is given.
    The entire candidate selection uses these lists; the authors later challenge HSC 2962, showing the lists are not uniformly reliable.
  • ad hoc to paper A symbiotic star's Gaia BP/RP photometry can be treated as a single-star CMD point without correcting for the hot component or nebular emission.
    Implicit in placing CQ Dra on the giant branch in Figure 2; not stated or corrected in the paper.
  • ad hoc to paper The two newly identified members HD 40325 and HD 73131 are true members of HSC 1224.
    Their membership is based on the Prisegen et al. (2021) matching limits; no membership probability or radial velocity is given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Symbiotic stars in Galactic open clusters." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6HRMT6U7

@misc{pith2026250721994,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Symbiotic stars in Galactic open clusters},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6HRMT6U7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.21994}
}
read the original abstract

The age determination of symbiotic stars is essential to put further constraints on models explaining these binary systems. In the Galactic field, this is especially problematic because of several limitations due to reddening estimations, for example. We searched for symbiotic stars as members of Galactic open clusters for which the age and overall metallicity can be determined in a statistical sense. The most recent lists of well-established and candidate symbiotic stars and open clusters were matched, and we found seven good candidates from which the well-established symbiotic star CQ Dra seems to be a true member of the old open cluster HSC 1224. The colour-magnitude diagrams for the other candidates raise some doubts about membership.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.21994 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The CMDs of the open clusters Collinder 367, CWNU 170, HSC 225, HSC 509, and SAI 24 together with the corresponding symbiotic candidate. oration et al., 2016), the analysis of open clusters made enormous progress (Cantat-Gaudin, 2022). Based on the Gaia DR3 (Gaia Collaboration et al., 2023b), several independent studies analysed the members and cluster parame￾ters of a significant number of aggregates (e.g. Hunt and… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The only confirmed symbiotic star of our sample, Gaia DR3 1683014206596170240 and its host open cluster HSC 1244. The triangles denote HD 40325 and HD 73131, two newly discovered members which support the derived age. The isochrones are from Bressan et al. (2012) with log t values of 9.2, 9.4, and 9.6, respectively. from the Gaia DR3 (Gaia Collaboration et al., 2023b). The matching limits of Priˇsegen et al. (2021) … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Upper : Gaia DR3 4058686267291546880 located in the cluster HSC 2962, classified as open cluster in Hunt and Reffert (2023). Lower : The globular cluster NGC 6388 with the candidate symbiotic star Gaia DR3 5955269200163469440 as a comparison. See text for a more detailed discussion. symbiotic star. Additionally, this star was classified as A0 III by Cohen (1980) and given the possibility of being an FU Ori star by W… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The host open cluster can hardly be recognised by its CMD. It is a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Akras , S. (2023). Where are the missing symbiotic stars? Uncovering hidden symbiotic stars in public catalogues . , 519(4):6044--6054

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    L., and Ramos-Larios , G

    Akras , S., Guzman-Ramirez , L., Leal-Ferreira , M. L., and Ramos-Larios , G. (2019). A Census of Symbiotic Stars in the 2MASS, WISE, and Gaia Surveys . , 240(2):21

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Alfonso , J., Garc \' a-Varela , A., and Vieira , K. (2024). Exploring Galactic open clusters with Gaia. I. An examination in the first kiloparsec . , 689:A18

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Allen , D. A. (1982). Infrared studies of symbiotic stars. In Friedjung , M. and Viotti , R., editors, IAU Colloq. 70: The Nature of Symbiotic Stars , volume 95 of Astrophysics and Space Science Library , pages 27--42

    work page 1982

  5. [5]

    B., Jesus , R

    Am \^o res , E. B., Jesus , R. M., Moitinho , A., Arsenijevic , V., Levenhagen , R. S., Marshall , D. J., Kerber , L. O., K \"u nzel , R., and Moura , R. A. (2021). GALExtin: an alternative online tool to determine the interstellar extinction in the Milky Way . , 508(2):1788--1797

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Bayo , A., Rodrigo , C., Barrado Y Navascu \'e s , D., Solano , E., Guti \'e rrez , R., Morales-Calder \'o n , M., and Allard , F. (2008). VOSA: virtual observatory SED analyzer. An application to the Collinder 69 open cluster . , 492(1):277--287

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    R., Giersz , M., Rivera Sandoval , L

    Belloni , D., Miko ajewska , J., I kiewicz , K., Schreiber , M. R., Giersz , M., Rivera Sandoval , L. E., and Rodrigues , C. V. (2020). On the absence of symbiotic stars in globular clusters . , 496(3):3436--3447

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Bressan , A., Marigo , P., Girardi , L., Salasnich , B., Dal Cero , C., Rubele , S., and Nanni , A. (2012). PARSEC: stellar tracks and isochrones with the PAdova and TRieste Stellar Evolution Code . , 427(1):127--145

    work page 2012

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Cantat-Gaudin , T. (2022). Milky Way Star Clusters and Gaia: A Review of the Ongoing Revolution . Universe , 8(2):111

    2022

  2. [10]

    and Bragaglia , A

    Carretta , E. and Bragaglia , A. (2022). Metallicity of the globular cluster NGC 6388 based on high-resolution spectra of more than 160 giant stars . , 659:A122

    2022

  3. [11]

    Cavallo , L., Spina , L., Carraro , G., Magrini , L., Poggio , E., Cantat-Gaudin , T., Pasquato , M., Lucatello , S., Ortolani , S., and Schiappacasse-Ulloa , J. (2024). Parameter Estimation for Open Clusters using an Artificial Neural Network with a QuadTree-based Feature Ext...

    2024

  4. [12]

    Cohen , M. (1980). Red and nebulous objects in dark clouds : a survey. , 85:29--35

    1980

  5. [13]

    S., Monteiro , H., Moitinho , A., L \'e pine , J

    Dias , W. S., Monteiro , H., Moitinho , A., L \'e pine , J. R. D., Carraro , G., Paunzen , E., Alessi , B., and Villela , L. (2021). Updated parameters of 1743 open clusters based on Gaia DR2 . , 504(1):356--371

    2021

  6. [14]

    P., Bailyn , C

    Eggleton , P. P., Bailyn , C. D., and Tout , C. A. (1989). Constraints on Cataclysmic Variable Evolution from the Triple System 4 Draconis . , 345:489

    1989

  7. [15]

    K., Bochanski , J

    Faherty , J. K., Bochanski , J. J., Gagn \'e , J., Nelson , O., Coker , K., Smithka , I., Desir , D., and Vasquez , C. (2018). New and Known Moving Groups and Clusters Identified in a Gaia Comoving Catalog . , 863(1):91

    2018

  8. [16]

    J., Aerts , C., Mombarg , J

    Fritzewski , D. J., Aerts , C., Mombarg , J. S. G., Gossage , S., and Van Reeth , T. (2024). Age uncertainties of red giants due to cumulative rotational mixing of progenitors calibrated by asteroseismology . , 684:A112

    2024

  9. [17]

    u ller , H., Stephenson , C. A., S \

    Gaia Collaboration , Montegriffo , P., Bellazzini , M., De Angeli , F., Andrae , R., Barstow , M. A., Bossini , D., Bragaglia , A., Burgess , P. W., Cacciari , C., Carrasco , J. M., Chornay , N., Delchambre , L., Evans , D. W., Fouesneau , M., Fr \'e mat , Y., Garabato , D., J...

    2023

  10. [18]

    u ller , H., Stephenson , C. A., Stoev , H., Suess , F. F., S \

    Gaia Collaboration , Prusti , T., de Bruijne , J. H. J., Brown , A. G. A., Vallenari , A., Babusiaux , C., Bailer-Jones , C. A. L., Bastian , U., Biermann , M., Evans , D. W., Eyer , L., Jansen , F., Jordi , C., Klioner , S. A., Lammers , U., Lindegren , L., Luri , X., Mignard...

    2016

  11. [19]

    u ller , H., Stephenson , C. A., S \

    Gaia Collaboration , Vallenari , A., Brown , A. G. A., Prusti , T., de Bruijne , J. H. J., Arenou , F., Babusiaux , C., Biermann , M., Creevey , O. L., Ducourant , C., Evans , D. W., Eyer , L., Guerra , R., Hutton , A., Jordi , C., Klioner , S. A., Lammers , U. L., Lindegren ,...

    2023

  12. [20]

    Gonz \'a lez-Santamar \' a , I., Manteiga , M., Manchado , A., Ulla , A., Dafonte , C., and L \'o pez Varela , P. (2021). Planetary nebulae in Gaia EDR3: Central star identification, properties, and binarity . , 656:A51

    2021

  13. [21]

    Gromadzki , M., Miko ajewska , J., and Soszy \'n ski , I. (2013). Light Curves of Symbiotic Stars in Massive Photometric Surveys II. S and D'-Type Systems . , 63(4):405--428

    2013

  14. [22]

    Halbwachs , J.-L., Pourbaix , D., Arenou , F., Galluccio , L., Guillout , P., Bauchet , N., Marchal , O., Sadowski , G., and Teyssier , D. (2023). Gaia Data Release 3. Astrometric binary star processing . , 674:A9

    2023

  15. [23]

    Hunt , E. L. and Reffert , S. (2023). Improving the open cluster census. II. An all-sky cluster catalogue with Gaia DR3 . , 673:A114

    2023

  16. [24]

    Jadhav , V. V. and Subramaniam , A. (2021). Blue straggler stars in open clusters using Gaia: dependence on cluster parameters and possible formation pathways . , 507(2):1699--1709

    2021

  17. [25]

    L., Feuillet , D., and Casagrande , L

    Kushniruk , I., Bensby , T., Feltzing , S., Sahlholdt , C. L., Feuillet , D., and Casagrande , L. (2020). The HR 1614 moving group is not a dissolving cluster . , 638:A154

    2020

  18. [26]

    R., Rocha-Pinto , H

    Laversveiler , M., Gon c alves , D. R., Rocha-Pinto , H. J., and Merc , J. (2025). The local group symbiotic star population and its tenuous link with type Ia supernovae . , 698:A155

    2025

  19. [27]

    B., Sokoloski , J

    Lucy , A. B., Sokoloski , J. L., Luna , G. J. M., Mukai , K., Nu \ n ez , N. E., Buckley , D. A. H., Breytenbach , H., Paul , B., Potter , S. B., Manick , R., Howell , D. A., Wolf , C., and Onken , C. A. (2024). A new way to find symbiotic stars: accretion disc detection with ...

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Luna , G. J. M., Sokoloski , J. L., Mukai , K., and Nelson , T. (2013). Symbiotic stars in X-rays . , 559:A6

    2013

  21. [29]

    A., and Boyer , M

    McDonald , I., Zijlstra , A. A., and Boyer , M. L. (2012). Fundamental parameters and infrared excesses of Hipparcos stars . , 427(1):343--357

    2012

  22. [30]

    McInnes, L., Healy, J., and Astels, S. (2017). hdbscan: Hierarchical density based clustering. The Journal of Open Source Software , 2(11)

    2017

  23. [31]

    and Boffin , H

    Merc , J. and Boffin , H. M. J. (2025). Revisiting symbiotic binaries with interferometry: I. The PIONIER archival collection . , 695:A61

    2025

  24. [32]

    Merc , J., G \'a lis , R., and Wolf , M. (2019). First Release of the New Online Database of Symbiotic Variables . Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society , 3(2):28

    2019

  25. [33]

    Merc , J., G \'a lis , R., Wolf , M., Velez , P., Buil , C., Sims , F., Bohlsen , T., Vra s t \'a k , M., Boussin , C., Boussier , H., Cazzato , P., Diarrasouba , I., and Teyssier , F. (2021). Spectroscopic and photometric analysis of symbiotic candidates - I. Ten candidates o...

    2021

  26. [34]

    Miko ajewska , J. (2013). Symbiotic Stars as Possible Progenitors of SNe Ia: Binary Parameters and Overall Outlook . In Di Stefano , R., Orio , M., and Moe , M., editors, Binary Paths to Type Ia Supernovae Explosions , volume 281 of IAU Symposium , pages 162--165

    2013

  27. [35]

    Miszalski , B., Miko ajewska , J., and Udalski , A. (2013). Symbiotic stars and other H emission-line stars towards the Galactic bulge . , 432(4):3186--3217

    2013

  28. [36]

    Muerset , U., Wolff , B., and Jordan , S. (1997). X-ray properties of symbiotic stars. II. Systems with colliding winds. , 319:201--210

    1997

  29. [37]

    Munari , U. (2019). The Symbiotic Stars . arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:1909.01389

    2019 arXiv

  30. [38]

    L., Hambsch , F

    Munari , U., Traven , G., Masetti , N., Valisa , P., Righetti , G. L., Hambsch , F. J., Frigo , A., C otar , K., De Silva , G. M., Freeman , K. C., Lewis , G. F., Martell , S. L., Sharma , S., Simpson , J. D., Ting , Y. S., Wittenmyer , R. A., and Zucker , D. B. (2021). The GA...

    2021

  31. [39]

    Netopil , M., Paunzen , E., and Carraro , G. (2015). A comparative study on the reliability of open cluster parameters . , 582:A19

    2015

  32. [40]

    and Vogel , M

    Nussbaumer , H. and Vogel , M. (1987). A new approach to symbiotic stars. , 182:51--62

    1987

  33. [41]

    A., Boji c i \'c , I

    Parker , Q. A., Boji c i \'c , I. S., and Frew , D. J. (2016). HASH: the Hong Kong/AAO/Strasbourg H planetary nebula database . In Journal of Physics Conference Series , volume 728 of Journal of Physics Conference Series , page 032008. IOP

    2016

  34. [42]

    Pri s egen , M., Piecka , M., Faltov \'a , N., Kajan , M., and Paunzen , E. (2021). White dwarf-open cluster associations based on Gaia DR2 . , 645:A13

    2021

  35. [43]

    W., \'A brah \'a m , P., Carnerero , M

    Rimoldini , L., Holl , B., Gavras , P., Audard , M., De Ridder , J., Mowlavi , N., Nienartowicz , K., Jevardat de Fombelle , G., Lecoeur-Ta \" bi , I., Karbevska , L., Evans , D. W., \'A brah \'a m , P., Carnerero , M. I., Clementini , G., Distefano , E., Garofalo , A., Garc \...

    2023

  36. [44]

    I., Pols , O

    Saladino , M. I., Pols , O. R., and Abate , C. (2019). Slowly, slowly in the wind. 3D hydrodynamical simulations of wind mass transfer and angular-momentum loss in AGB binary systems . , 626:A68

    2019

  37. [45]

    M., Bazzon , A., Milli , J., Roelfsema , R., Engler , N., Mouillet , D., Lagadec , E., Sissa , E., Sauvage , J

    Schmid , H. M., Bazzon , A., Milli , J., Roelfsema , R., Engler , N., Mouillet , D., Lagadec , E., Sissa , E., Sauvage , J. F., Ginski , C., Baruffolo , A., Beuzit , J. L., Boccaletti , A., Bohn , A. J., Claudi , R., Costille , A., Desidera , S., Dohlen , K., Dominik , C., Fel...

    2017

  38. [46]

    L., Amard , L., and Roquette , J

    See , V., Lu , Y. L., Amard , L., and Roquette , J. (2024). The impact of stellar metallicity on rotation and activity evolution in the Kepler field using gyro-kinematic ages . , 533(2):1290--1299

    2024

  39. [47]

    Valle , G., Dell'Omodarme , M., and Tognelli , E. (2021). Goodness-of-fit test for isochrone fitting in the Gaia era. Statistical assessment of the error distribution . , 649:A127

    2021

  40. [48]

    Webster , B. L. and Allen , D. A. (1975). Symbiotic stars and dust. , 171:171

    1975

  41. [49]

    and Fuhrmann , B

    Wenzel , W. and Fuhrmann , B. (1983). Remark on the Nature of the Eruptive Object LW Cassiopeiae . Zentralinstitut fuer Astrophysik Sternwarte Sonneberg Mitteilungen ueber Veraenderliche Sterne , 9:143--145

    1983

  42. [50]

    J., Mukai , K., and de Martino , D

    Wheatley , P. J., Mukai , K., and de Martino , D. (2003). X-ray observations of 4 Draconis: symbiotic binary or cataclysmic triple? , 346(3):855--860

    2003

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.