Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 8 minor 10 references

Large magnon dichroism and other optical properties of hexagonal ferrite h-Lu0.6Sc0.4FeO3 with altermagnetic A2 spin ordering

T0 review · 4 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Terahertz measurements show that the antiferromagnetic magnon doublet in h-Lu0.6Sc0.4FeO3 is split by about 0.06 THz at zero applied field, evidence the authors attribute to its altermagnetic A2 spin structure.

desk verdict Solid first data on LSFO magnons with a real zero-field dichroism, but the altermagnetic attribution is unproven and the DMI alternative must be answered. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.22172 v1 pith:IE7XZ5TB submitted 2025-07-29 cond-mat.other physics.optics

V. A. Martinez (1) , A. A. Sirenko (1) , L. Bugnon (2) , P. Marsik (2) , C. Bernhard (2) , Qing Zhang (3) , G. L. Pascut (4) , F. Lyzwa (1
show 19 more authors
5) Z. Liu (6) K. Du (7) S.-W. Cheong (7) ((1) Department of Physics New Jersey Institute of Technology (2) Department of Physics University of Fribourg (3) School of Physics Shandong University (4) MANSiD Research Center Faculty of Forestry Stefan Cel Mare University (USV) (5) NSLS-II Brookhaven National Laboratory (6) Department of Physics University of Illinois at Chicago (7) Keck Center for Quantum Magnetism Department of Physics Astronomy)
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.otherphysics.optics
keywords h-Lu0.6Sc0.4FeO3altermagnetismmagnondichroismterahertzspectroscopyvectorvortexbeamsA2spinstructuremultiferroics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Terahertz spectroscopy of the hexagonal ferrite h-Lu0.6Sc0.4FeO3 finds that its antiferromagnetic spin excitation (a magnon) is already split at zero applied magnetic field into two circularly polarized components, separated by about $0.06$ THz. The paper attributes this zero-field 'magnon dichroism' to the A2 spin structure, a canted non-collinear arrangement of Fe$^{3+}$ moments that breaks both parity and time-reversal symmetry and is therefore classified as a strong altermagnetic phase, even though the crystal's net magnetization is only about $0.01\,\mu_B$ per formula unit. If correct, the compound becomes an insulating multiferroic altermagnet whose hidden magnetic order can be read out optically at terahertz frequencies, and the dichroism becomes a general probe for altermagnetism in materials with nearly zero net magnetization. The paper also reports a magnon g-factor of $g=3.0$ for Fe$^{3+}$, nonreciprocal light propagation below 10 K, Fano-broadened optical phonons, and a DFT+eDMFT description of the electronic transitions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the A2 spin structure, in which Fe$^{3+}$ moments on the trimerized triangular lattice form a nearly $120^\circ$ non-collinear pattern with a small c-axis canting that couples a weak ferromagnetic moment to the electric polarization. Because this structure breaks parity and time reversal together, it is classified as a 'strong altermagnetic' phase, a compensated magnetic order whose simultaneous P and T breaking allows spin-dependent optical responses without net magnetization. The observable that carries the argument is the M1 magnon doublet: its zero-field splitting $\Delta\approx0.06$ THz, the opposite circular-polarization selection rules of its two branches, and the sign reversal with magnetic field and with the orbital angular momentum of vector vortex beams. The paper invokes the finite scalar spin chirality $S_1\cdot(S_2\times S_3)$ and the associated Berry phase as the mechanism generating the effective internal field that splits the magnons.

What would settle it

A decisive check would be to compute the zero-field magnon splitting from a spin Hamiltonian whose exchange, single-ion, and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya parameters are fixed by the measured remanent magnetization, the g-factor, and the reorientation field: if the splitting computed from the weak ferromagnetic canting alone is much smaller than $0.06$ THz, and the splitting persists in a fully poled single A2-domain crystal measured with high polarization purity, the altermagnetic interpretation is confirmed; if the splitting collapses or scales with the ordinary magnetization, it is not.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a strong circular dichroism of the antiferromagnetic magnon doublet at zero external field: the M1 magnon near $0.85$ THz splits into two branches, separated by about $0.06$ THz, that are active in opposite circular polarizations of terahertz light. The same splitting is reproduced with terahertz vector vortex beams carrying orbital angular momentum $\ell=\pm1$, and its sign can be reversed by reversing either the applied magnetic field or the beam vorticity. The authors interpret this as the zero-field optical signature of the A2 spin structure with broken PT symmetry, a 'strong altermagnetic' phase, and estimate that the splitting corresponds to an effective internal field of about $1.4$ T acting on the Fe$^{3+}$ spins, far larger than the $0.01\,\mu_B$ per formula unit remanent moment would produce. In applied fields along the c axis the doublet splitting gives a g-factor of $g=3.0$ for Fe$^{3+}$, and below 10 K the field needed to reorient the remanent magnetization depends on the light propagation direction, demonstrating nonreciprocal propagation.

Load-bearing premise

The claim rests on the assumption that the $0.06$ THz zero-field splitting of the magnon doublet is too large to be explained by the crystal's tiny measured ferromagnetic moment of $0.01\,\mu_B$ per formula unit, so it must come from an effective internal field of about $1.4$ T generated by altermagnetic order or by spin chirality.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Below $T_N=160$ K, h-Lu0.6Sc0.4FeO3 becomes a candidate insulating multiferroic altermagnet in which electric polarization, weak ferromagnetism, and zero-field terahertz circular dichroism coexist.
  • Zero-field magnon dichroism, seen with both circular polarization and vector vortex beams, can serve as a spectroscopic fingerprint that distinguishes the altermagnetic A2 phase from the non-altermagnetic A1 phase in hexagonal ferrites and related multiferroics.
  • The measured g-factor of $g=3.0$ for Fe$^{3+}$ and the reorientation field of about $0.25$ T give quantitative constraints that any microscopic spin Hamiltonian of the A2 phase must reproduce.
  • The nonreciprocal light propagation below 10 K implies that the c axis of an A2-ordered crystal acts as a one-way channel for terahertz light, with the preferred direction set by the electric polarization and the remanent magnetization.
  • The paper predicts a large magneto-optical Kerr effect in h-Lu0.6Sc0.4FeO3 below 160 K, extending altermagnetic optics from metals to an insulating ferroelectric compound.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the paper finds that A1 domains grow below 60 K while the reported zero-field splitting stays roughly constant, a natural test is to measure the splitting across that crossover: an exclusive A2 origin should make the dichroism weaken as the A1 fraction grows.
  • If the Berry-phase spin-chirality mechanism is correct, the sign of the zero-field splitting should follow the handedness of the non-collinear spins, the sign of $S_1\cdot(S_2\times S_3)$, so circular-dichroism imaging could map the vortex-antivortex ferroelectric domain structure with terahertz light.
  • The same circular-dichroism probe could be applied to other hexagonal ferrites or manganites with A1/A2 competition, predicting that zero-field magnon dichroism appears only where the canted A2 phase dominates.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 8 minor

Summary. The paper reports a multi-technique optical study of hexagonal Lu0.6Sc0.4FeO3 single crystals, including THz transmission with circular polarizations and vector vortex beams, Raman scattering, infrared ellipsometry, and visible-UV ellipsometry combined with DFT+eDMFT calculations. The authors observe two magnon modes (M1 at ~0.8 THz and M2 at ~1.2 THz), an electromagnon, phonons, and electronic transitions. The central claim is that the M1 magnon appears as a doublet split by about 0.06 THz at zero external field, with opposite circular polarizations selecting the two branches, and that this zero-field dichroism is evidence for altermagnetic A2 spin ordering with broken P·T symmetry. Additional results include a fitted Fe3+ g-factor of 3.0, a nonreciprocal reorientation field asymmetry at low temperature, a Fano asymmetric phonon at 115 cm-1, and a DFT+eDMFT interpretation of the electronic spectra.

Significance. If the altermagnetic interpretation is correct, the paper would provide a valuable zero-field optical signature of an insulating multiferroic altermagnet and predict a large magneto-optical Kerr effect below 160 K. The experimental data set is rich and the internal consistency of the THz transmission fits, the temperature and field dependencies, and the ellipsometry/DFT+eDMFT comparison is a clear strength. However, the central attribution of the zero-field magnon splitting to altermagnetism is an interpretation rather than a derivation; the manuscript explicitly defers the needed spin-structure calculations. The observed zero-field doublet splitting and circular dichroism are significant experimental facts regardless of the interpretation, but the paper's title and conclusions currently overstate the evidence.

major comments (4)
  1. [Experimental Results, A (Eq. 1 and following paragraph)] The inference that Δ≈0.06 THz (2 cm-1) cannot be explained by the weak ferromagnetic moment is not justified. In a canted antiferromagnet, the zero-field magnon splitting is controlled by the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya (DM) exchange field, which can be of order 1 T or more while the net canting moment remains ~0.01 μB/f.u. The manuscript's comparison of the effective field 1.4 T with the measured remnant magnetization 0.01 μB/f.u. (Ref. 3) does not rule out the conventional DM mechanism because the two quantities are not directly related. The text itself states that 'elaborate spin-structure calculations that includes the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction' are left for future work. Without a spin-wave or DMI calculation showing that the standard canted-A2 mechanism cannot produce the observed splitting, the altermagnetic attribution is an unsupported hypothesis rather than a demonstrated conclusion.
  2. [Experimental Results, A (vector vortex beam paragraph)] The VVB data are presented as corroborating evidence for the zero-field dichroism, but the paper explicitly states that 'there are no strong arguments to relate the magnon line shape to the specifics of the ferroelectric domains or magnetic spin structure' and that the observed asymmetry is 'more reasonable to assign ... to systematic errors due to imperfect alignment of the axicon optics.' This self-acknowledged artifact limitation should be stated in the abstract and conclusions, and the VVB results should be treated as preliminary. The conventional circular-polarization transmission data remain the primary evidence, but they alone do not establish the altermagnetic mechanism.
  3. [Introduction and Experimental Results, A (domain coexistence)] The manuscript notes that A1 and A2 spin structures coexist as micron-sized domains below 60 K, while the THz beam footprint is mm-sized, so the transmission averages over many domains. The analysis does not address how A1/A2 domain averaging affects the observed zero-field doublet splitting and the circular-polarization selection rules. If the A1 and A2 domains have different magnon frequencies, the apparent doublet could be a superposition of domain responses rather than an intrinsic splitting of a single A2 domain. This issue is load-bearing for the central claim and needs to be addressed, for example by estimating the domain fractions from the spectroscopic data or by measuring a single-domain sample.
  4. [Experimental Results, A (Eq. 1 and g-factor fit)] The g-factor of 3.0±0.5 is extracted from a two-parameter empirical fit using Eq. (1), and the zero-field splitting Δ appears both as a fitted parameter and as an input to the effective-field estimate. The manuscript does not report the fit residuals, the correlation between Δ and g, or the statistical basis for the quoted uncertainty. Since the 1.4 T estimate depends directly on the product g·Δ, a proper error propagation is needed before using this value to argue against the conventional weak-ferromagnetic explanation.
minor comments (8)
  1. [Abstract and text] The phrase 'applied long the c axis' should be 'applied along the c axis' in the abstract and in the main text.
  2. [Table I caption] The caption contains a typo: 'thee electromagnon' should be 'the electromagnon'.
  3. [Experimental Results, A (temperature cycling)] The phrase 'back town to T=6 K' should be 'back down to T=6 K'.
  4. [Introduction (spin value)] The text refers to 'Fe3+ ions having nominal S=3/2' when estimating the effective field, but later the manuscript expects high-spin Fe3+ with S=5/2 and the DFT+eDMFT section argues for Fe valence 2.5+ with effective spin closer to S=2. Please ensure a consistent spin value is used in the g-factor and effective-field estimates.
  5. [Introduction (magnetic point group)] The magnetic point group is written as '6/'m mm' with garbled symbols; please use a clear notation such as 6/m'mm' or 6/mm'm' and define the symbols.
  6. [Fig. 4 caption] The caption says '(c) Temperature dependence of the magnetization reversal field BR' but the text refers to Fig. 4(d) for BR(T) and Fig. 4(c) for low-field magnon frequencies; the caption and figure panel labels need to be reconciled.
  7. [Eq. (1)] Equation (1) is typeset with missing symbols; the intended form appears to be Ω±(B,T) = Ω0(T) ± 1/2 sqrt(Δ² + (g μB B)²), but the displayed formula is garbled and should be rewritten clearly.
  8. [References] The reference list contains duplicate entries: Ref. 4 and Ref. 8 are the same paper, and Ref. 6 and Ref. 10 are the same paper. These should be consolidated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the magnon dichroism is a measured quantity, the A2/altermagnetic classification is applied from a symmetry taxonomy rather than fitted, and the self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central new observation is the zero-field splitting of the M1 magnon doublet (Delta = 0.06 THz) and the opposite circular-polarization selection rules, both measured directly in transmission. Equation (1) is a phenomenological fit to the field-dependent splitting; it introduces the g-factor and Delta, but these are fitted to the data, not used as inputs to construct a prediction that is then claimed as independent. The later statement that M_R = Delta/(g μ_B) = 1.4 T is a restatement of the measured splitting in field units, not a separate predicted quantity, and the comparison with the 0.01 μB remnant moment from Ref. [3] is an interpretation, not a circular derivation. The A2 spin structure and its broken PT symmetry are taken from prior neutron, magnetization, and symmetry work (Refs. [1,3,10,11,13]), including coauthor Cheong's classification of non-collinear 'strong altermagnets'; however, this is a parameter-free symmetry labeling rather than a fitted result, and the paper's evidence for PT-breaking is the measured dichroism, which is independent of that labeling. The VVB method is self-cited (Ref. [18]) as an external technique, and the DFT+eDMFT calculations rely on previously published code and methods (Refs. [33-41]); these are supporting tools, not circular assumptions. The paper itself flags the main weakness of the altermagnetic attribution: 'The large zero-filed magnon splitting in LSFO should be additionally clarified with elaborate spin-structure calculations that includes the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction' and also cautions that the VVB line-shape asymmetry 'is more reasonable to assign ... to systematic errors due to imperfect alignment of the axicon optics.' These are limitations on the physical interpretation, not circularity in the derivation. The 'prediction' of a large MOKE below 160 K is a qualitative consequence of the observed dichroism, not a computed result that reduces to fitted constants. Overall, the paper is self-contained on the experimental side, and the interpretive step is an application of an external symmetry classification rather than an equation that re-imports its own conclusion.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central result depends on two fitted parameters (Delta and g) used to infer a 1.4 T internal field, plus a symmetry classification borrowed from prior work by one of the authors. No microscopic spin-wave or DMI calculation is supplied, and the Berry-phase mechanism is invoked by analogy to Mn3Sn. This makes the altermagnetic interpretation plausible but not independently derived.

free parameters (5)
  • Zero-field magnon doublet splitting Delta = 0.06 THz (about 2 cm-1)
    Fitted from the difference between sigma+ and sigma- transmission minima at B=0, Fig. 3(a); used to infer an internal field of about 1.4 T and to argue for altermagnetic effects.
  • Fe3+ magnon g-factor = 3.0 plus or minus 0.5
    Obtained from fitting Eq. (1) to the magnetic-field dependence of the doublet splitting, Fig. 4(a); central to the Zeeman and internal-field interpretation.
  • Empirical magnon temperature dependence Omega0(T) = 0.80 to 1.0 THz between 6 K and about 140 K
    Guide-to-eye curves in Fig. 3(b) and Eq. (1); no microscopic model connects this to the magnetic susceptibility.
  • Fano asymmetry parameter q = -4.6 at 250 K
    Fitted to the 115 cm-1 E2 phonon line shape; supports the Fano mechanism but not the central magnon claim.
  • Oscillator parameters in Tables I-III = Various frequencies, strengths, broadenings
    All Lorentz oscillator strengths, widths, and positions are fitted to THz, infrared, Raman, and ellipsometry spectra; they support mode assignments but are not derived.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The A2 spin structure of LSFO is a strong altermagnetic phase with broken PT symmetry.
    Taken from the non-collinear altermagnetism classification of Cheong and Huang and related symmetry work; used in the abstract and conclusions to interpret the zero-field circular dichroism.
  • domain assumption A1 and A2 spin domains coexist at low temperature with sizes much smaller than the THz beam footprint, yet the net dichroism reflects A2.
    Stated in the introduction from prior neutron and magnetization studies; without a domain imbalance or polarization-selected A2 fraction, the mm-sized THz beam average could wash out dichroism.
  • standard math Lorentz oscillator modeling adequately represents the THz and IR dielectric response.
    Used for all fits of magnons, phonons, and electronic transitions; no line-shape derivation beyond the harmonic oscillator and Fano forms.
  • domain assumption The 0.06 THz zero-field splitting arises from an effective internal magnetic field at Fe sites rather than from two independent magnon modes of different domains.
    The paper treats the doublet as a single magnon split by an effective field; the two components are active in opposite circular polarizations, which supports it, but no spin-wave calculation is given.
  • domain assumption The Berry-phase spin-chirality mechanism can produce an effective magnetic field much larger than the macroscopic remanent magnetization.
    Invoked from spin-chirality literature and the Mn3Sn analogy to explain the 1.4 T internal field estimate; explicitly left for future calculations.
invented entities (1)
  • Effective internal magnetic field of about 1.4 T at Fe3+ sites
    purpose: Explains the zero-field magnon doublet splitting of 0.06 THz without relying on the tiny remanent magnetization.
    Obtained from Eq. (1) and the fitted g-factor; no independent probe confirms this field, and the Berry-phase origin is speculative.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Large magnon dichroism and other optical properties of hexagonal ferrite h-Lu0.6Sc0.4FeO3 with altermagnetic A2 spin ordering." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IE7XZ5TB

@misc{pith2026250722172,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Large magnon dichroism and other optical properties of hexagonal ferrite h-Lu0.6Sc0.4FeO3 with altermagnetic A2 spin ordering},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IE7XZ5TB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.22172}
}
read the original abstract

Multiferroic hexagonal h-Lu0.6Sc0.4FeO3 single crystals with non-collinear spins were studied using the THz and Raman scattering spectroscopies and ellipsometry. Antiferromagnetic resonances, or magnons, were found at about 0.85 THz and 1.2 THz. These magnons harden as temperature increases and disappear above 130 K. This behavior is consistent with the magnetic susceptibility and a phase transition to a previously reported weak ferromagnetic state. A strong dichroism at the resonance with the AFM doublet has been observed at zero external magnetic field using both conventional circular polarization and THz vector vortex beams. This observation is attributed to the strong altermagnetic properties of h-Lu0.6Sc0.4FeO3 with a broken PT symmetry. The splitting of the magnon doublet in an external magnetic field applied long the c axis yields a g-factor of 3.0 for the Fe3+ ions. Raman spectra of the optical phonons revealed a Fano-type asymmetry due to their interaction with a continuum of polar excitations. Electronic transitions were studied with ellipsometry and the results were compared with the modelled using DFT+eDMFT.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.22172 by the authors.

Figure 9
Figure 9. FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

10 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Geometric ferroelectricity in rare-earth compounds RGaO3 and RInO3

    1 S. M. Disseler, J. A. Borchers, C. M. Brooks, J. A. Mundy, J. A. Moyer, D. A. Hillsberry, E. L. Thies, D. A. Tenne, J. Heron, M. E. Holtz, J. D. Clarkson, G. M. Stiehl, P. Schiffer, D.A. Muller, D. G. Schlom, and W. D. Ratcliff, Magnetic Structure and Ordering of Multiferroic Hexagonal LuFeO3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 217602 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.217602 2015

  2. [2]

    Balatsky, Axion-matter coupling in multiferroics, Phys. Rev. Research 3, 033236 (2021). 9 H. Das, Coupling between improper ferroelectricity and ferrimagnetism in the hexagonal ferrite LuFeO3, Phys. Rev. Research 5, 013007 (2023). 10 S. Artyukhin, K. T. Delaney, N. A. Spaldin, and M. Mostovoy, Landau theory of topological defects in multiferroic hexagonal...

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Adjusted oscillator strength matching for hybrid magnetic and electric excitations in Dy3Fe5O12 garnet

    Bernhard, S. Park, S.-W. Cheong, M. Kotelyanskii, and A. A. Sirenko, “Adjusted oscillator strength matching for hybrid magnetic and electric excitations in Dy3Fe5O12 garnet”, Phys. Rev. B 83, 174407 (2011). 21 T. N. Stanislavchuk, Y. Wang, Y. Janssen, G. L. Carr, S.-W. Cheong, and A. A. Sirenko, “Magnon and electromagnon excitations in multiferroic DyFeO3...

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    Zang, J. M. Kikkawa, L. Wu, S. X. Huang, Kondo physics in antiferromagnetic Weyl semimetal Mn3+xSn1−x films. Sci. Adv. 6, eabc1977 (2020). 25 Nakatsuji, S., Kiyohara, N. & Higo, T. Large anomalous Hall effect in a non-collinear antiferromagnet at room temperature. Nature 527, 212–215 (2015). 26 H. Ishizuka, N. Nagaosa, Spin chirality induced skew scatteri...

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Synchrotron-radiation based far- infrared spectroscopic ellipsometer with a full Muller matrix capability

    Nita, T. Zhou, G. L. Carr, M. Kotelyanskii, and A. A. Sirenko, “Synchrotron-radiation based far- infrared spectroscopic ellipsometer with a full Muller matrix capability”, Rev. Sci. Instr. 84, 023901 (2013). 28 Smith, K. A.; Ramkumar, S. P.; Harms, N. C.; Clune, A. J.; Cheong, S.-W.; Liu, Z

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    A.; Musfeldt, J

    Nowadnick, E. A.; Musfeldt, J. L. Pressure-Induced Phase Transition and Phonon Softening in h−Lu0.6Sc0.4FeO3. Phys. Rev. B 104, 094109 (2021). 24 29 U. Fano, Phys. Rev. 124, 1866 (1961). 30 M.V. Klein, in Light Scattering in Solids VI, edited by M. Cardona (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984), Vol.54, p.147 31 C. Tomsen, in Light Scattering in Solids VII, edit...

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Kim, Unconventional room-temperature carriers in the triangular-lattice Mott insulator TbInO3, Nature Physics 19, 1611–1616 (2023). 33 K. Haule, Structural predictions for Correlated Electron Materials Using the Functional Dynamical Mean Field Theory Approach, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 87, 041005 (2018). 34 K. Haule, C. -H. Yee, and K. Kim, Dynamical mean -field...

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Kuroiwa, Hiroyuki Inoue, Weak Ferromagnetic Transition with a Dielectric Anomaly in Hexagonal Lu0.5Sc0.5FeO3, Inorg. Chem. 52, 20, 11889–11894 (2013). 25 43 K. Park, G. L. Pascut, G. Khanal, M. O. Yokosuk, Xianghan Xu, Bin Gao, M. J. Gutmann, A. P

    work page 2013

Show all 10 references
  1. [9]

    Kiryukhin, S

    Litvinchuk, V. Kiryukhin, S. -W. Cheong, D. Vanderbilt, K. Haule, and J. L. Musfeldt, Band-Mott mixing hybridizes the gap in Fe2Mo3O8, Phys. Rev. B 104, 195143 (2021). 44 Suheon Lee, D.T, Adroja, Qing Zhang, Gheorghe Lucian Pascut, Kristjan Haule, A.D. Hillier, M

    2021

  2. [10]

    Kockelmann, Sang-Wook Cheong, K-Y

    Telling, W. Kockelmann, Sang-Wook Cheong, K-Y. Choi, Spin dynamics and magnetic excitations of quasi-1D spin chain Ca3ZnMnO6, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.04919 (2025)

    2025 doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.