Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 60 references

Algorithm for Dark Matter-Admixed Neutron Stars

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that adding a dark-matter component to neutron stars changes their tidal deformability enough to alter the gravitational-wave phase of inspiraling binaries, and that the difference between bosonic and fermionic dark…

desk verdict A useful-sounding pipeline for DM-admixed NS waveforms, but the code is absent, the detectability argument doesn't match the computed signals, and a key figure has an inconsistent parameter. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.22415 v2 pith:7ZHN2HRN submitted 2025-07-30 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.CO

Nguyen Thi Lan Anh , Peter Lott , Quynh Lan Nguyen This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.CO PACS 04.30.-w95.35.+d97.60.Jd
keywords darkmatter-admixedneutronstarstidaldeformabilitygravitationalwavestwo-fluidTOVequationsbosonicmatterfermionicLALSuitewaveformmodeling
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes Darksuite, a software extension that would let gravitational-wave analysis pipelines produce templates for neutron stars laced with dark matter. Its central claim is that the tidal deformability—and therefore the gravitational-wave phase evolution during inspiral—depends measurably on both the fraction of dark matter inside the star and on whether that dark matter is bosonic or fermionic. The authors integrate the two-fluid Tolman–Oppenheimer–Volkoff equations with a modified tidal perturbation equation, build an interpolated surface of Love numbers, and feed the result into standard LALSuite waveform models. They show waveforms for a GW170817-like binary whose bosonic and fermionic dark-matter versions accumulate a coherent, oscillatory phase difference over the inspiral. If the calculation is right, gravitational-wave observations of binary neutron stars could serve as an indirect probe of dark-matter microphysics.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the two-fluid generalization of the relativistic stellar-structure and tidal-response equations: the two-fluid TOV system (Eqs. 4–6) plus the first-order $y$-perturbation equation (Eq. 9) with the two-fluid quadrupole source $Q(r)$ (Eq. 10). Integrating these outward to $R = \max(R_{\rm NM}, R_{\rm DM})$ yields $y_R$, which feeds the Love-number formula (Eq. 8) and the dimensionless tidal deformability $\Lambda = \frac{2}{3} k_2 / C^5$. That $\Lambda$ enters the NRTidalv3 phase correction (Eq. 3), and the resulting phase shift is embedded in IMRPhenomPv2 to produce waveforms. The interpolation of $(C, f, k_2)$ over a bank of TOV solutions is what lets the pipeline evaluate arbitrary dark-matter fractions without reintegrating the structure equations.

What would settle it

Recompute $k_2$ for the $f = 0.8$, $C = 0.08$ bosonic and fermionic configurations with a solver that enforces the proper junction conditions at each fluid surface (at $R_{\rm NM}$ and $R_{\rm DM}$ separately), and compare the resulting $\Lambda$ values to the Darksuite-interpolated values; if the shifted $\Lambda$ brings the bosonic and fermionic phase differences below the mismatch threshold of $1/(2 \, \mathrm{SNR}^2)$, the central claim of resolvability collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a user-supplied dark-matter fraction and particle statistics (bosonic or fermionic) produce a distinct tidal-deformability surface $\Lambda(M)$ and, through the NRTidalv3 phase correction, gravitational waveforms that differ from pure-nuclear templates and from each other. The authors demonstrate this with a two-fluid TOV solver using the BSk22 equation of state for nuclear matter and either a self-interacting bosonic or an ideal fermionic dark-matter equation of state, with density scales chosen so pure dark-matter stars are solar-mass-scale. A key displayed result is the $f = 0.8$, $C = 0.08$ comparison in Figure 3, where the bosonic and fermionic waveforms go in and out of phase over the inspiral; the authors argue from a heuristic mismatch criterion that phase modulations above about $0.03$ radians would be resolvable at the GW170817 signal-to-noise ratio. The paper frames Darksuite as a first step toward including dark matter in standard gravitational-wave data analysis rather than as a finished parameter-estimation study.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the two-fluid tidal deformability is computed correctly as implemented, which requires that integrating the $y$-equation to the outer radius with no explicit interface conditions at the surface where one fluid ends is a valid prescription; if $k_2$ is wrong for these mixed configurations, every downstream $\Lambda$ and the key bosonic-versus-fermionic waveform comparison are wrong.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If a neutron star in a detected binary contains a non-negligible dark-matter admixture, standard templates will mis-estimate the tidal contribution to the phase, biasing recovered masses and radii.
  • The bosonic-versus-fermionic difference at $f = 0.8$ is large enough that, under the paper's SNR heuristic, current detectors could distinguish the two microphysical models from the inspiral alone.
  • The interpolated $(C, f, k_2)$ surfaces make it feasible to include dark-matter-admixed stars in parameter-estimation pipelines without rerunning TOV solvers for each sample.
  • The comparison of mass-radius curves with GW170817 posteriors shows dark-matter-admixed configurations can occupy the observationally allowed region, so such stars are not excluded by current constraints.
  • The framework extends to other exotic components or modified-gravity variants by adding new equation-of-state classes, so the same machinery generalizes beyond the two dark-matter models tested.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Not claimed by the paper: a decisive validation would be to run the same pipeline with a multi-fluid tidal solver that imposes junction conditions at each fluid surface; if $k_2$ shifts, the central bosonic-versus-fermionic comparison may change.
  • The chosen density scales imply a maximum-mass difference between the bosonic and fermionic cases (about $2.7 M_\odot$ versus $2.5 M_\odot$), suggesting a mass-radius observable independent of tides, such as in merger remnant properties.
  • The paper's heuristic threshold implies that next-generation detectors with SNR well above 30 could resolve phase modulations below $0.03$ radians, extending sensitivity to lower dark-matter fractions.
  • The GW170817 comparison is qualitative because spins are ignored; a full parameter-estimation run with Darksuite templates would be needed to determine whether dark matter is actually favored over ordinary equation-of-state variation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper introduces Darksuite, a proposed Python-based extension of LALSuite for modeling gravitational-wave signals from dark-matter-admixed neutron stars. The core algorithm solves the two-fluid Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equations for nuclear matter (BSk22) plus either self-interacting bosonic or ideal fermionic dark matter, computes the dimensionless tidal deformability via the Hinderer equation with a two-fluid modified source term, and generates waveforms using the NRTidalv3 tidal phase correction. It presents mass-radius and tidal deformability-mass sequences for several dark-matter fractions, a waveform comparison between bosonic and fermionic dark matter at f = 0.8, and a heuristic detectability discussion based on a sinusoidal phase-modulation model.

Significance. If the numerical implementation is correct, Darksuite would provide a useful template-generation tool for a class of exotic-compact-object searches, and the paper correctly identifies an existing gap in the LALSuite waveform infrastructure. The qualitative behavior of the M-R and Lambda-M curves is consistent with prior work on dark-matter-admixed neutron stars, and the authors are transparent about the exploratory nature of the proposal. However, the paper's central results are not yet fully validated: the two-fluid tidal deformability integration lacks a stated interface treatment, the one comparative waveform figure uses a dark-matter density scale inconsistent with the rest of the paper, and the detectability claim rests on a sinusoidal heuristic that is not connected to the computed monotonic tidal phase drift. The paper is better viewed as an algorithm description than as a demonstrated detection capability.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II.C, Eq. (10); Section III (integration stopping criteria)] The two-fluid tidal deformability computation is not fully specified for configurations in which one fluid ends at a smaller radius than the other (the DM-core and DM-halo cases of Figure 1). The paper integrates a single y-perturbation equation with the summed two-fluid source term Q(r) to R = max(R_NM, R_DM), but it does not state how Q(r) is evaluated in the shell where one fluid has already reached zero pressure and density, nor whether any junction condition is imposed at that interface. Since the Love number k2 in Eq. (8) depends on y at the outer radius, and every downstream quantity (Lambda, phase shift in Eq. (3), and the comparison in Figure 3) inherits this dependence, the validity of the results for hybrid configurations is not established. Please specify the treatment of the interface region and, ideally, validate the two-fluid integration against a dedicated multi-fluid tidal code or release the Darksuite code so this step can be reproduced.
  2. [Section IV, Figure 3 caption vs Section IV/Figure 1] There is an internal inconsistency in the dark-matter density scale used for the fermionic case. Section IV and Figure 1 quote rho_F hbar^3 = 1.9 x 10^-4 GeV^4, while the Figure 3 caption quotes rho_F hbar^3 = 1.4 x 10^-4 GeV^4. If Figure 3 was generated with the latter value, the bosonic-versus-fermionic phase difference may reflect the different density scales rather than the particle-statistics difference; if it was generated with 1.9 x 10^-4 GeV^4, the caption is wrong. In either case, the highlighted comparative result in Figure 3 is ambiguous and must be corrected, and the waveforms should be regenerated or the caption fixed and the analysis repeated with a consistent value.
  3. [Section V and Section VI (detectability)] The detectability argument is not connected to the waveforms actually computed. The sinusoidal phase-modulation model Psi(f) = Psi0 sin(2 pi f T) and the resulting threshold Psi0 >~ 1/(SNR |sin(2 pi f0 T)|) describe an oscillatory phase modulation, but the NRTidalv3 tidal phase corrections used in Figure 3 produce a monotonic, growing phase drift with frequency. The paper neither extracts Psi0 from the computed phase difference nor evaluates the noise-weighted mismatch between the bosonic and fermionic waveforms, so the claim in Section VI that 'phase modulations can accumulate coherently over the inspiral and may become detectable' is not supported by the presented quantitative analysis. Please replace the sinusoidal heuristic with a concrete overlap calculation for the actual waveforms, or substantially weaken the detectability conclusion.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Figure 3 caption] The caption contains typographical errors: 'fermonic' should be 'fermionic', and 'pannel' should be 'panel'.
  2. [Section IV, Figure 1 caption] The notation for the density scales is inconsistent: 'rho_B hbar' and 'rho_F hbar' should be 'rho_B hbar^3' and 'rho_F hbar^3' to match the units GeV^4.
  3. [Section IV] The phrase 'delivering ng a maximum mass' is a typo and should read 'delivering a maximum mass'.
  4. [Section III] The phrase 'the inspiral phase phase of the gravitational waveform' contains a duplicated word and should be corrected.
  5. [Section II.D.1, Eq. (12)] Equation (12) is garbled in presentation; the denominator and exponential terms appear to be missing brackets (e.g., 'exp[a5(xi - a6) + 1}' should likely be '(exp[a5(xi - a6)] + 1)^-1'). Please re-typeset the BSk22 functional so it is unambiguous.
  6. [Section III (integration stopping criteria)] The statement that 'the integration ends when the pressure of either fluid approaches zero' is ambiguous for two-fluid configurations; clarify that after one fluid's pressure vanishes, the integration continues for the remaining fluid until its own pressure vanishes at its surface.
  7. [General] The manuscript describes Darksuite as a 'proposed extension' but does not provide a code repository or pseudocode. Given that the two-fluid tidal integration is a central and nonstandard step, releasing the code or providing detailed pseudocode would substantially improve reproducibility and verifiability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the waveform pipeline is feed-forward from external TOV and tidal-formalism inputs; self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's claimed derivation chain is feed-forward: two-fluid TOV equations (Eqs. 4-6) with specified nuclear (BSk22) and DM EOSs (Eqs. 13-21) determine stellar structure; the tidal Love number k2 (Eq. 8) follows from the y-perturbation equation (Eq. 9) with the two-fluid source (Eq. 10); Lambda = (2/3)k2/C^5 (Eq. 7); and the waveform phase shift delta-Psi is taken from the externally published NRTidalv3/Dietrich et al. formula (Eq. 3). None of these steps is defined in terms of the final waveform or of the detectability claim, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. The DM density scales rho_B and rho_F are chosen following [7] to make pure DM stars solar-mass; this calibrates the model but does not determine the phase difference presented in Figure 3. The paper's self-citations ([16], [42]) are background or consistency statements, and the cumulative-phase-shift claim is independently supported by the external references [37-41] in the same citation block; hence there is no load-bearing circularity. What the paper does contain are verification gaps, not circularity: the Section V detectability threshold is derived for a sinusoidal modulation Psi(f)=Psi0 sin(2*pi*f*T), but the NRTidalv3-generated phase drift is monotonic and Psi0 is never extracted from Figure 3; and the Figure 3 caption quotes rho_F*hbar^3=1.4e-4 GeV^4 while Section IV and Figure 1 use 1.9e-4 GeV^4, so the headline bosonic-versus-fermionic comparison is not yet internally consistent. These issues affect the strength of the detectability conclusion but do not make the derivation circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claims rest on imported structure: the two-fluid TOV formalism [18], the two DM EOS prescriptions [21, 25], the Hinderer Love number formalism [19], the NRTidalv3 phase model [34], and 23 externally fitted BSk22 coefficients. To those, the paper adds four hand-chosen inputs (ρ_B, ρ_F, the f grid, and the showcase value f = 0.8) and one ad hoc detectability model in Section V. The largest unstated burden is the two-fluid tidal problem: Eq. (10) sums sound-speed terms over fluids, but no interface conditions are given for configurations where one fluid ends at a different radius, and the absent code cannot settle the question.

free parameters (4)
  • Bosonic DM EOS density scale ρ_B ℏ³ (self-interacting scalar) = 9.1×10⁻⁴ GeV⁴
    Sets the bosonic EOS of Eqs. (13)-(14) via ρ_B = μ_B⁴/(4aℏ³). Chosen 'so that stellar objects of pure DM are of solar mass scale (following [7])'. Controls the magnitude of the DM effect on the mass-radius and tidal curves.
  • Fermionic DM density scale ρ_F ℏ³ (equivalently fermion mass μ_F) = 1.9×10⁻⁴ GeV⁴, μ_F = 0.49 GeV in Section IV; Figure 3 caption states 1.4×10⁻⁴ GeV⁴
    Sets the fermionic EOS of Eqs. (17)-(19). The Section IV text and the Figure 3 caption disagree on the value, so the showcase waveform comparison carries an unresolved ambiguity.
  • Dark matter fraction f (grid values and the showcase value) = 5%, 10%, 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, 100%
    Hand-selected grid for Figures 1 and 2. The waveform comparison of Figure 3 uses f = 0.8, 'chosen to highlight the impact of dark matter composition', so the displayed effect is selected by the authors rather than discovered.
  • BSk22 nuclear EOS coefficients a1...a23 = 23 values in Table I
    Imported from the Brussels-Montreal mass fit of Ref. [20]. The quantitative M-R and Λ-M curves depend on this choice; no alternative nuclear EOS is varied, so the robustness of the DM-induced trends to the nuclear EOS is untested.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Two-fluid TOV equations (Eqs. 4-6) describe a cold, spherical star in hydrostatic equilibrium with nuclear and dark fluids interacting only through gravity and sharing one metric
    Section II.B. Excludes non-gravitational DM-baryon interactions, heat transport, and rotation. The authors note the GW170817 posteriors include spin while this solver does not, so the Figure 1 comparison is qualitative.
  • domain assumption Dark matter is either a self-interacting bosonic gas (Eq. 13) or an ideal fermionic gas (Eqs. 17-20)
    Section II.D. Both EOS are imported from the literature [21, 25]; the quoted self-interaction range σ/m in 0.1-10 cm²/g is described as consistent with empirical constraints. The particle nature is an input assumption, not a derived result.
  • domain assumption Hinderer's single-fluid tidal Love number formalism (Eqs. 8-10) applies to a two-fluid star, with the quadrupole source summing sound-speed terms over both fluids
    Section II.C. The formal multi-fluid tidal problem requires matching conditions at the inner surface where only one fluid pressure vanishes; the paper states no such conditions, and the absence of code leaves the treatment unverifiable.
  • domain assumption The NRTidalv3 tidal phase correction, calibrated on numerical relativity of ordinary neutron stars, fully captures the DM-modified tidal effect once the DM-modified Λ is inserted
    Section III. The waveform is produced by substituting the two-fluid Λ into a phenomenological tidal model calibrated on numerical relativity of ordinary neutron stars; the paper provides no check against numerical relativity of DM-admixed binaries, though it cites Ref. [40].
  • ad hoc to paper The phase modulation can be modeled as sinusoidal, Ψ(f) = Ψ0 sin(2π f T), with mismatch M ≈ (1/2)Ψ0² sin²(2π f0 T) and a detection threshold of 1/(2 SNR²)
    Section V. The paper asserts this model and states 'a complete calculation of this kind is beyond the scope of this paper'. The phase shift from Eq. (3) is monotonic in frequency, not an oscillation with a single timescale T, so the heuristic is not tied to the computed waveforms.
  • domain assumption IMRPhenomPv2 with non-spinning, quasi-circular binaries is an adequate waveform backbone
    Section III. Chosen for wide usage and convenience; spin and eccentricity are excluded to isolate the structural imprint of dark matter.
invented entities (1)
  • Darksuite (proposed Python framework)
    purpose: The paper's central deliverable: a two-module pipeline that solves two-fluid TOV, builds a (C, f, k2) bank, interpolates k2, and feeds Λ into LALSuite waveform models
    The paper's central deliverable is announced but not shipped: no code, repository, commit, tests, or data files appear anywhere in the manuscript, so the framework has no falsifiable handle outside the paper's prose. The figures could be reproduced from the cited equations, but the software itself, the claimed contribution, is not independently verifiable.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Algorithm for Dark Matter-Admixed Neutron Stars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7ZHN2HRN

@misc{pith2026250722415,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Algorithm for Dark Matter-Admixed Neutron Stars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7ZHN2HRN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.22415}
}
abstract

Gravitational-wave observations provide a unique window into the fundamental nature of massive objects. In particular, neutron star equations of state have been constrained due to the success of gravitational wave observatories. Recently, the possibility of detecting dark matter-admixed Neutron stars via ground-based laser interferometry have been explored. Dark matter would impact the gravitational waveform of an inspiraling neutron star system through tidal parameters, namely the tidal deformability $\lambda$, incurring a phase shift to the frequency evolution of the signal. This phase shift would depend both on the percentage of dark matter within the star and its particle nature, e.g., bosonic or fermionic. Indirect detection of dark matter through admixture within neutron stars can provide insight into the neutron equation of state, as well as constraints on the density of dark matter in the universe. In this work, we introduce Darksuite, a proposed extension of the LALSuite software framework, designed to model the gravitational wave signatures of dark-matter-admixed neutron stars. This framework employs simulations from the two-fluid, generally relativistic Tolman- Oppenheimer-Volkoff equations, wherein one fluid is ordinary nuclear matter and the other is dark matter. We demonstrate interpolation of values from a bank of simulations, enabling the study of binary systems where at least one component may be a dark-matter-admixed neutron star. By leveraging existing methodologies within LALSuite for tidal phase corrections and supplementing them with dark matter effects, Darksuite provides a means to generate and analyze gravitational waveforms for these exotic systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.22415 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Mass – Radius relations for admixed neutron star of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Dimensionless tidal deformability-mass relations for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Gravitational waveforms in the case of bosonic (blue) and fermonic (dark red) dark matter, with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    [20] as a candidate to simulate the properties of nuclear mat- ter under extreme conditions

    Nuclear Matter In this work, we employ the Brussels-Montreal energy densityfunctionalBSk22developedbyPearsonet.al. [20] as a candidate to simulate the properties of nuclear mat- ter under extreme conditions. This EOS was chosen be- cause it provides a unified microscopic treatment of nu- clear physics in all three regions of the neutron star (i.e. the out...

    work page

  2. [2]

    This model is from Flores et al

    Dark matter: Bosonic case Wemodeledthedark-mattercomponentinanadmixed neutron star using an EOS derived from a relativistic bosonic field with self-interaction. This model is from Flores et al. [21] covers a realistic parameter space for the self-coupling strength and the mass of the scalar boson, consistent with empirical constraints: 0.1 cm2/g ≤ σ m ≤ 1...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Dark matter: Fermionic case The second participant for dark matter issued in this paper is the ideal Fermionic gas, which follows the para- metric form for EOS [25]: ρ = ρF (sinh t − t), (17) p = 1 3 ρF (sinh t + 3t − 8 sinh t 2 ), (18) with ρF = 1 32π2 µ4 F ℏ3 , (19) t = 4 ln   s 1 + ˆp µF 2 + ˆp µF   , (20) where µF is the rest mass of the particle ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    On the masses of nebulae and of clusters of nebulae

    Fritz Zwicky. On the masses of nebulae and of clusters of nebulae. Astrophysical Journal, 86:217, 1937. doi: 10.1086/143864

    doi:10.1086/143864 1937

  5. [5]

    Rubin and W

    Vera C. Rubin and W. Kent Ford Jr. Rotation of the andromeda nebula from a spectroscopic survey of emis- sion regions. Astrophysical Journal, 159:379, 1970. doi: 10.1086/150317

    doi:10.1086/150317 1970

  6. [6]

    Gonzalez, Maxim Markevitch, Scott W

    Douglas Clowe, Maruša Bradač, Anthony H. Gonzalez, Maxim Markevitch, Scott W. Randall, Christine Jones, and Dennis Zaritsky. A direct empirical proof of the exis- tence of dark matter.Astrophysical Journal Letters, 648 (2):L109–L113, 2006. doi:10.1086/508162

    doi:10.1086/508162 2006

  7. [7]

    Aghanim, et al

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, et al. Planck 2018 results. vi. cosmological parameters. Astron- omy & Astrophysics , 641:A6, 2020. doi:10.1051/0004- 6361/201833910. arXiv:1807.06209

    arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    S. D. M. White and M. J. Rees. Core condensa- tion in heavy halos: A two-stage theory for galaxy formation and clustering. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , 183:341–358, 1978. doi: 10.1093/mnras/183.3.341

    doi:10.1093/mnras/183.3.341 1978

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Fundamental particle structure in the cosmological dark matter

    MAXIM KHLOPOV. Fundamental particle structure in the cosmological dark matter. International Jour- nal of Modern Physics A , 28(29):1330042, 2013. doi: 10.1142/S0217751X13300421. URL https://doi.org/ 10.1142/S0217751X13300421

    2013 doi

  2. [10]

    Tidal deformability of dark matter admixed neu- tron stars

    Kwing-Lam Leung, Ming-chung Chu, and Lap-Ming Lin. Tidal deformability of dark matter admixed neu- tron stars. Phys. Rev. D , 105(12):123010, 2022. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.123010

    2022 doi

  3. [11]

    Nelson, Sanjay Reddy, and Dake Zhou

    Ann E. Nelson, Sanjay Reddy, and Dake Zhou. Dark ha- losaroundneutronstarsandgravitationalwaves. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2019(07):012, jul

    2019

  4. [13]

    B. P. Abbott, others (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, and Virgo Collaboration). Gw170817: Observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspi- ral. Physical Review Letters, 119(16):161101, 2017. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101

    2017 doi

  5. [14]

    etc.) B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration. Multi-messenger observations of a binary neutron star merger. Astrophys. J. Lett. , 848(2): L12, 2017. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9

    2017 doi

  6. [15]

    Abbott et al

    Virgo Collaboration R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scien- tific Collaboration and KAGRA Collaboration). Obser- vationofgravitationalwavesfromtwoneutronstar–black hole coalescences. Astrophys. J. Lett. , 915(1):L5, 2021. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac082e

    2021 doi

  7. [16]

    Mathews, Lara Arielle Phillips, Miguel A

    Quynh Lan Nguyen, Grant J. Mathews, Lara Arielle Phillips, Miguel A. Correa, In-Saeng Suh, and Jared W. Coughlin. 3-3-1 self interacting dark matter and the galaxy core-cusp problem. Modern Physics Letters A , 36(03):2130001, 2021. doi:10.1142/S0217732321300019. URL https://do...

    2021 doi

  8. [18]

    Two-fluid dark matter ad- mixed neutron stars

    Chong-Xing Yue, Ming-Jian Zhang, Qian Pan, Shuang Yang, and Zhi-Qiang Guo. Two-fluid dark matter ad- mixed neutron stars. Phys. Rev. D , 109:023008, Jan

  9. [19]

    Closed-form tidal approximants for binary neutron star gravitationalwaveformsconstructedfromhigh-resolution numerical relativity simulations

    Tim Dietrich, Sebastiano Bernuzzi, and Wolfgang Tichy. Closed-form tidal approximants for binary neutron star gravitationalwaveformsconstructedfromhigh-resolution numerical relativity simulations. Phys. Rev. D , 96(12): 121501, 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.121501

    2017 doi

  10. [20]

    H. N. Long and N. Q. Lan. Self-interacting dark matter and higgs bosons in the su(3)c⊗ su(3)l ⊗ u(1)n model with right-handed neutrinos. Europhysics Letters , 64 (4):571, nov 2003. doi:10.1209/epl/i2003-00267-5. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1209/epl/i2003-00267-5

    2003 doi

  11. [21]

    Vásquez Flores, Alessandro Parisi, Chian-Shu Chen, and Germán Lugones

    C. Vásquez Flores, Alessandro Parisi, Chian-Shu Chen, and Germán Lugones. Fundamental oscillation modes of self-interacting bosonic dark stars. Journal of Cosmol- ogy and Astroparticle Physics , 2019(06):051, jun 2019. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/06/051. URL https://dx. doi.org...

    2019 doi

  12. [23]

    Dark matter halos as particle colliders: Unified solution to small-scale structure puzzles from dwarfs to clus- ters

    Manoj Kaplinghat, Sean Tulin, and Hai-Bo Yu. Dark matter halos as particle colliders: Unified solution to small-scale structure puzzles from dwarfs to clus- ters. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 116:041302, Jan 2016. doi: 10 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.041302. URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10....

    2016 doi

  13. [24]

    Randall, Maxim Markevitch, Douglas Clowe, Anthony H

    Scott W. Randall, Maxim Markevitch, Douglas Clowe, Anthony H. Gonzalez, and Marusa Bradač. Constraints on the self-interaction cross section of dark matter from numerical simulations of the merging galaxy cluster 1e 0657–56. The Astrophysical Journal , 679(2):1173, jun

  14. [25]

    Tidal love numbers of neutron stars

    Tanja Hinderer. Tidal love numbers of neutron stars. The Astrophysical Journal , 677(2):1216, apr 2008. doi: 10.1086/533487. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/ 533487

    2008 doi

  15. [26]

    N. N. Shchechilin, N. Chamel, J. M. Pearson, A. I. Chugunov, and A. Y. Potekhin. Unified equations of state for cold nonaccreting neutron stars with brussels- montreal functionals. v. improved parametrization of the nucleon density distributions. Phys. Rev. C , 109: 055802, Ma...

    2024 doi

  16. [27]

    A simpli- fied derivation and analysis of fourth order runge kutta method

    Musa H., Ibrahim Saidu, and Marianus Waziri. A simpli- fied derivation and analysis of fourth order runge kutta method. International Journal of Computer Applica- tions, 9, 11 2010. doi:10.5120/1402-1891

    2010 doi

  17. [28]

    Dark matter self- interactions and small scale structure

    Sean Tulin and Hai-Bo Yu. Dark matter self- interactions and small scale structure. Physics Reports, 730:1–57, 2018. ISSN 0370-1573. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2017.11.004. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0370157317304039. Dark matter self-i...

    2018 doi

  18. [29]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coales- cences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run.Phys. Rev. X , 13(4): 041039, 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041039

    2023 doi

  19. [30]

    Abbott, Virgo Collaboration others (LIGO Scien- tificCollaboration, andKAGRACollaboration)

    R. Abbott, Virgo Collaboration others (LIGO Scien- tificCollaboration, andKAGRACollaboration). Gwtc-3: Compact binary coalescences observed by ligo and virgo during the second part of the third observing run.arXiv preprint, 2021

    2021

  20. [31]

    B. P. Abbott, others (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, and Virgo Collaboration). Gw190425: Observation of a compact binary coalescence with total mass ∼3.4 m⊙. Astrophysical Journal Letters , 892(1):L3, 2020. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab75f5

    2020 doi

  21. [32]

    J. R. Oppenheimer and G. M. Volkoff. On massive neutron cores. Phys. Rev., 55:374–381, Feb 1939. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.55.374

    1939 doi

  22. [33]

    LVK Algorithm Library - LAL- Suite

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration. LVK Algorithm Library - LAL- Suite. Free software (GPL), 2018

    2018

  23. [34]

    New and robust gravitational-waveform model for high-mass-ratio bi- nary neutron star systems with dynamical tidal ef- fects

    Adrian Abac, Tim Dietrich, Alessandra Buonanno, Jan Steinhoff, and Maximiliano Ujevic. New and robust gravitational-waveform model for high-mass-ratio bi- nary neutron star systems with dynamical tidal ef- fects. Phys. Rev. D , 109(2):024062, 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.024062

    2024 doi

  24. [35]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, S. Abra- ham, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, R. X. Ad- hikari, V. B. Adya, C. Affeldt, M. Agathos, K. Agat- suma, N. Aggarwal, O. D. Aguiar, L. Aiello, A. Ain, P. Ajith, G. Allen, A. Allocca, M. A. Aloy, P. A. Al- tin, A. Amato, A. Ana...

  25. [36]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031040

    doi

  26. [37]

    Lackey, Ryan N

    Tanja Hinderer, Benjamin D. Lackey, Ryan N. Lang, and Jocelyn S. Read. Tidal deformability of neutron stars with realistic equations of state and their gravitational wave signatures in binary inspiral. Phys. Rev. D , 81: 123016, 2010. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.123016

    2010 doi

  27. [38]

    Reconstructingthe neutron-star equation of state with gravitational-wave detectors from a realistic population of inspiralling bi- nary neutron stars

    BenjaminD.LackeyandLeslieWade. Reconstructingthe neutron-star equation of state with gravitational-wave detectors from a realistic population of inspiralling bi- nary neutron stars. Phys. Rev. D , 91:043002, 2015. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.043002

    2015 doi

  28. [39]

    Ellis, A

    J. Ellis, A. Hektor, G. Hütsi, K. Kannike, L. Marzola, M. Raidal, and V. Vaskonen. Dark matter effects on neutron star properties. Phys. Rev. D , 97:123007, 2018

    2018

  29. [40]

    B. P. Abbott, others (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, and Virgo Collaboration). Gw190814: Gravitational waves from the coalescence of a 23 solar mass black hole with a 2.6solarmasscompactobject. Astrophysical Journal Let- ters, 896(2):L44, 2020. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab960f

    2020 doi

  30. [41]

    Scipy: Open source scientific tools for python

    Eric Jones, Travis Oliphant, Pearu Peterson, et al. Scipy: Open source scientific tools for python. http://www.scipy.org/, 2001. Accessed: 2025-07-22

    2001

  31. [42]

    Quynh Lan Nguyen and Andrew L. Miller. Dark Matter and its Effect on Gravitational Wave Signal.PoS, EPS- HEP2023:132, 2024. doi:10.22323/1.449.0132

    2024 doi

  32. [43]

    Phenomenological model for the gravitational-wave signal from precessing binary black holes with two-spin effects.Phys

    Sebastian Khan, Katerina Chatziioannou, Mark Han- nam, and Frank Ohme. Phenomenological model for the gravitational-wave signal from precessing binary black holes with two-spin effects.Phys. Rev. D, 100(2):024059,

  33. [44]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.024059

    doi

  34. [45]

    Abbott et al

    Virgo Collaboration R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scien- tific Collaboration and KAGRA Collaboration). Popula- tion properties of compact objects from the second ligo– virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog.Astrophys. J. Lett., 913(1):L7, 2021

    2021

  35. [46]

    É. É. Flanagan and Scott A. Hughes. Measuring grav- itational waves from binary black hole coalescences: I. signal to noise for inspiral, merger, and ringdown.Phys. Rev. D, 57(8):4535–4565, 1998

    1998

  36. [47]

    Cutler and É

    C. Cutler and É. É. Flanagan. Gravitational waves from merging compact binaries: How accurately can one ex- tract the binary’s parameters from the inspiral wave- form? Phys. Rev. D , 49(6):2658–2697, 1994

    1994

  37. [48]

    Eric Poisson and Clifford M. Will. Gravitational waves from inspiraling compact binaries: Parameter estimation using second-post-newtonian waveforms. Phys. Rev. D , 52(2):848–855, 1995

    1995

  38. [49]

    Numerical Relativity Simulations of Dark Matter Admixed Binary Neutron Stars.arXiv preprint, 4 2025

    Edoardo Giangrandi, Hannes Rueter, Nina Kunert, Mat- tia Emma, Adrian Abac, Ananya Adhikari, Tim Dietrich, Violetta Sagun, Wolfgang Tichy, and Constanca Provi- dencia. Numerical Relativity Simulations of Dark Matter Admixed Binary Neutron Stars.arXiv preprint, 4 2025. 11

    2025

  39. [50]

    Prashant Thakur, Tuhin Malik, Arpan Das, T. K. Jha, B. K. Sharma, and Constança Providência. Feasibility of dark matter admixed neutron star based on recent observational constraints. To be published, 8 2024

    2024

  40. [51]

    Use and abuse of the fisher in- formation matrix in the assessment of gravitational- wave parameter-estimation prospects.Phys

    Michele Vallisneri. Use and abuse of the fisher in- formation matrix in the assessment of gravitational- wave parameter-estimation prospects.Phys. Rev. D , 77: 042001, 2008. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.042001

    2008 doi

  41. [52]

    Flanagan

    Curt Cutler and Éanna E. Flanagan. Gravitational waves from merging compact binaries: How accurately can one extract the binary’s parameters from the inspiral waveform? Phys. Rev. D , 49:2658–2697, 1994. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.2658

    1994 doi

  42. [53]

    Flanagan and Tanja Hinderer

    Éanna É. Flanagan and Tanja Hinderer. Constrain- ing neutron-star tidal love numbers with gravitational- wave detectors. Phys. Rev. D , 77:021502, 2008. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.021502

    2008 doi

  43. [54]

    Benjamin J. Owen. Search templates for gravitational waves from inspiraling binaries: Choice of template spacing. Phys. Rev. D , 53:6749–6761, 1996. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.53.6749

    1996 doi

  44. [58]

    J. et al. Veitch. Parameter estimation for compact bina- ries with ground-based gravitational-wave observations using the lalinference software library.Phys. Rev. D , 91: 042003, 2015

    2015

  45. [59]

    B. P. et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration Abbott and Virgo Collaboration). Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger.Phys. Rev. Lett. , 116: 061102, 2016

    2016

  46. [61]

    Im- pact of dark matter on tidal signatures in neutron star mergers with the Einstein Telescope.Phys

    Hauke Koehn, Edoardo Giangrandi, Nina Kunert, Rahul Somasundaram, Violetta Sagun, and Tim Dietrich. Im- pact of dark matter on tidal signatures in neutron star mergers with the Einstein Telescope.Phys. Rev. D , 110 (10):103033, 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.103033

    2024 doi

  47. [62]

    A. G. Abac et al. Ultralight vector dark matter search using data from the KAGRA O3GK run.Phys. Rev. D , 110(4):042001, 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.042001

    2024 doi

  48. [63]

    Prob- ing ultralight dark matter with future ground-based gravitational-wave detectors

    Chen Yuan, Richard Brito, and Vitor Cardoso. Prob- ing ultralight dark matter with future ground-based gravitational-wave detectors. Phys. Rev. D , 104(4): 044011, 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.044011

    2021 doi

  49. [2008]

    URL https://dx.doi.org/ 10.1086/587859

    doi:10.1086/587859. URL https://dx.doi.org/ 10.1086/587859

    doi

  50. [2019]

    URL https: //dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/07/012

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/07/012. URL https: //dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/07/012

    2019 doi

  51. [2021]

    URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.03606

    arXiv

  52. [2024]

    URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.023008

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.023008. URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.023008

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.