Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 43 references

Second harmonic generation in polycrystalline ZnS nanowaveguides

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Zinc sulfide nanowaveguides, fabricated for the first time, produce phase-matched second harmonic generation at 737 nm when pumped at 1474 nm, supporting ZnS as an integrated nonlinear photonics platform.

desk verdict Credible first SHG in ZnS nanowaveguides, but missing a power-scaling check leaves the central claim one control short. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.22667 v2 pith:UIKKEJZ6 submitted 2025-07-30 physics.optics

Antoine Lemoine , Lise Morice , Brieg Le Corre , Antoine Létoublon , Alex Naïm , Thomas Batte , Mathieu Perrin , Charles Cornet
show 3 more authors
Yannick Dumeige Christophe Levallois Yoan léger
This is my paper
classification physics.optics PACS 42.65.Ky42.82.-m78.20.-e
keywords zincsulfidesecondharmonicgenerationnanowaveguidesintegratednonlinearphotonicsphasematchingpolycrystallinethinfilmsRFmagnetronsputteringwidebandgapsemiconductors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports the first zinc sulfide (ZnS) nanowaveguides and the first observation of phase-matched second harmonic generation (SHG) in them: light at 1474 nm injected into a sputtered polycrystalline waveguide emerges at 737 nm, with a sharp resonance at the wavelength predicted by modal phase matching. The authors argue this establishes ZnS as a practical integrated nonlinear photonics platform, using a high-index wide-bandgap material with transparency from 400 nm to 10 µm and only one independent second-order nonlinear coefficient, rather than the costly single-crystal or poled materials used today. They support the claim with a tensor analysis showing that a specifically chosen TM→TM polarization configuration keeps its nonlinear coefficient constant under random crystallite twist, and with imaging that shows the second-harmonic signal building up along the guide. The measured instantaneous conversion efficiency is estimated at 0.4 %/W/cm², to be compared with a theoretical upper value of 21 %/W/cm² for a perfect monocrystalline device, and the gap is interpreted as partial crystallite misorientation.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the second-order susceptibility tensor $\chi^{(2)}$ of zinc-blende ZnS expressed in the crystallographic basis aligned with the [111] growth direction. Rotating the standard tensor, whose only nonzero components in the cubic frame are $d_{14}=d_{25}=d_{36}$, into the $[1\bar{1}0]$, $[11\bar{2}]$, $[111]$ basis yields effective nonlinear coefficients, and one specific process, $E_{y''} E_{y''} \to P_{z''}$ (involving $d_{33}''$), has a coefficient independent of rotation around [111], so uncontrolled crystallite twist does not destroy the nonlinear response. The second essential piece is modal phase matching: finite-element dispersion calculations for an 810 nm wide, 500 nm high guide show that only the TM00 pump can phase match around 1480 nm, to the TM02 mode, locating the observable SHG peak and tying the spectrum to the crystal orientation.

What would settle it

Measure the 737 nm signal power as the 1474 nm pump power is varied over at least a decade on a log-log plot: genuine SHG must fall on a straight line of slope 2, and the signal must disappear when the pump is blocked or detuned far from 1474 nm. A slope near 1, or a signal that survives with the waveguide removed while pumping the bare fiber, would refute the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that 737 nm light with a sharp spectral peak at a 1474 nm pump wavelength, together with a scattered-light image showing signal growth along the propagation direction, demonstrates phase-matched TM00→TM02 second harmonic generation inside a polycrystalline ZnS nanowaveguide. Because the phase-matching wavelength coincides with the calculated position for a zinc-blende crystal oriented along [111], the authors conclude that random quasi-phase-matching is absent and that most crystallites share a preferential [111] orientation; the previously noted crystallite twist around that axis should not suppress the chosen TM→TM process, since its effective nonlinear coefficient is twist-invariant. This makes ZnS, previously only a bulk or thin-film nonlinear material, a viable integrated waveguide platform whose SHG efficiency is claimed to be close to that of GaP nanowaveguides under the same type of modal phase matching.

Load-bearing premise

The detected 737 nm light is genuinely second harmonic light generated inside the ZnS waveguide, because the paper reports no power-dependence curve, no on/off control, and no background estimate to rule out stray light, fluorescence, or fiber-link nonlinearity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Phase-matched SHG in polycrystalline ZnS waveguides implies that integrated frequency conversion does not require single-crystal epitaxy or periodic poling for twist-insensitive polarization configurations.
  • Reducing propagation losses from the measured 40–55 dB/cm toward 5 dB/cm and increasing guide length toward 1.2 cm is forecast by the authors to raise conversion efficiency by two orders of magnitude.
  • The sharp phase-matching peak at the monocrystal position shows that the polycrystalline film retains a dominant [111] crystallite orientation, and the efficiency shortfall allows an estimate that about 60% of crystallites are aligned.
  • The platform's transparency from 400 nm to 10 µm opens a route to on-chip frequency conversion into the visible and mid-infrared using the same fabrication flow.
  • Because ZnS uses elements not on the European critical raw materials list, the platform could provide a resource-supply advantage over lithium niobate and III-V waveguides.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A power-dependence measurement, which the paper does not report, would directly test the SHG attribution: genuine second-harmonic power should grow as the square of the pump power and vanish when the pump is blocked or the guide is removed.
  • The twist-invariance argument likely generalizes to other polycrystalline zinc-blende materials such as ZnSe and ZnTe, suggesting that sputtered wide-bandgap films could form a family of integrated nonlinear platforms without epitaxial growth.
  • If crystallite size can be engineered independently of orientation, the same platform could be steered between the two regimes discussed in the paper: narrowband oriented-crystal phase matching or broadband random quasi-phase-matching conversion.
  • The inferred 60% crystallite alignment could be checked directly by electron-backscatter-diffraction or pole-figure measurements on the same films, offering an independent validation of the efficiency interpretation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports the fabrication of ZnS nanowaveguides by sputtering and electron-beam lithography, their linear characterization, and the observation of second harmonic generation (SHG) in the TM→TM configuration. A tensor rotation calculation for (111)-oriented zincblende ZnS predicts a d33 coefficient of 1.15 d14, and COMSOL simulations predict modal phase matching for TM00→TM02 at 1480 nm. Experiments using an OPO pump at 1474 nm show a spectral peak at 737 nm and a top-view scattering image consistent with signal build-up; the instantaneous conversion efficiency is estimated at 0.4 %/W/cm². The authors claim this is the first demonstration of SHG in ZnS nanowaveguides.

Significance. If confirmed, this would establish ZnS as a new integrated nonlinear photonic platform, with the advantages of a wide transparency range, high nonlinear coefficients, and non-critical raw materials. The paper includes several strengths: the fabrication process is described in detail, the tensor rotation is benchmarked to the known 43m zincblende tensor and gives the correct effective coefficient for [111] propagation, the modal phase-matching prediction is concrete, and the observation of a spectral peak at exactly half the pump wavelength is a necessary signature. However, the central experimental claim currently lacks a standard control (quadratic power dependence) and the efficiency estimate is not independently verifiable, so the significance is contingent on additional evidence.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5] The central claim that the 737 nm signal is second harmonic generated inside the ZnS waveguide rests on a single spectrum and a scattering image. The paper reports no power-dependence measurement, no on/off control (e.g., pump blocked or light injected into a region without the waveguide), and no background measurement. Without a quadratic power-dependence curve, the spectral peak at exactly half the pump wavelength does not exclude stray light, detector artifacts, or nonlinearity in the 20 m fiber link. This is a load-bearing gap for the paper's central claim.
  2. [Section 5, conversion efficiency] The reported 0.4 %/W/cm² instantaneous conversion efficiency is stated to be derived in the supporting information, which is not included in the manuscript, and no error bars or systematic uncertainties are given for pump power, coupling efficiency, collection efficiency, or propagation losses. Furthermore, the statement that the discrepancy between theory and experiment is due to '60% of the crystallites' sharing a similar [111] orientation is inferred from the very same efficiency discrepancy; this is circular unless an independent structural measurement (e.g., EBSD or pole figures) supports the 60% fraction.
  3. [Section 3, Eqs. (2)–(4)] The rotation description is internally inconsistent: the text first gives θ0 = 45° around [001] and φ0 = 54.73° around [1̄10], then later gives φ0 = −45° and θ0 = −54.74°, and Eqs. (2) and (3) differ in form (one uses inverse rotation with Kronecker products, the other does not). While the final tensor in Eq. (4) appears consistent with the known [111] effective coefficient d33 = 1.15 d14, the presentation must be corrected so the derivation is traceable.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Section 2] The abstract says 'scanning electron microscopy (SEM)' while Section 2 says 'scanning electron beam microscopy'; please unify the terminology.
  2. [Section 5, paragraph 2] The sentence 'The OPO's wavelength was scanned from ݉ to ݉' contains missing numerical values; the scanned wavelength range should be stated explicitly.
  3. [Section 5, Figure 5a] The axes of the dispersion-curve plot are not described in the caption or text; please specify the plotted quantities and units.
  4. [Section 5, discussion of RQPM] The claim that the observation of a phase-matching peak at the expected spectral position indicates 'the absence of random quasi-phase matching' needs quantitative support, since a narrow spectral peak alone does not rule out RQPM; the spectral width and the expected RQPM bandwidth should be compared.
  5. [Section 4, loss measurements] Propagation losses are reported as averages without uncertainties; at least the spread or standard deviation should be given, and the statement 'competitive with the ones of nanowaveguides from other more mature platforms' should be supported by a direct comparison with specific references.
  6. [References] Reference [35] concerns SHG in gallium phosphide microdisks; its direct relevance to the ZnS crystallite orientation fraction should be clarified or replaced with a source specific to ZnS.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

Efficiency comparison is reconciled by a post-hoc 60% crystallite-orientation fraction, but the core SHG and phase-matching observations are independent, so circularity is limited.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 5, 'Second harmonic generation experiment', final paragraph (pp. 12-13)]
    "The discrepancy between theoretical and experimental values may be attributed to the orientation distribution of the crystallites, suggesting that 60% of the crystallites share a similar [111] crystal orientation [35]."

    Theoretical maximum efficiency (21 %/W/cm²) assumes a monocrystalline waveguide; measured efficiency is 0.4 %/W/cm², a ~50x shortfall. The paper attributes the entire shortfall to an unmeasured '60% of crystallites sharing a similar [111] orientation.' XRD establishes only a preferential (111) texture, not a quantitative fraction. The 60% is thus a one-parameter fit to the discrepancy it explains; using it to 'attribute' the discrepancy is reverse-fitting, not prediction. Cited [35] is a GaP microdisk study, not ZnS-specific support. The quantitative agreement is therefore partially circular, though the central SHG observation does not depend on this fit.

full rationale

The paper's core derivation chain is largely self-contained. Section 3 rotates the known 43m ZnS d-tensor into the [111] growth basis, deriving twist and tilt dependence analytically; this is a standard coordinate transformation with literature d14 values. Section 5's phase-matching prediction of 1480 nm combines independently measured refractive indices (ellipsometry), the fabricated waveguide geometry (SEM), and a COMSOL mode solver; the observed peak at 1474 nm is a genuine external test, not an input. The twist-invariant TM→TM configuration is derived before the experiment and then observed, which is a legitimate prediction. The only circular step is the closing efficiency comparison: the theoretical 21 %/W/cm² assumes a monocrystalline waveguide, while the measured 0.4 %/W/cm² is about 50 times lower. The paper attributes the entire shortfall to an otherwise unmeasured '60% of crystallites sharing a similar [111] orientation,' a single adjustable parameter that is inferred from the discrepancy it then explains. No independent measurement of the orientation fraction is reported, and the cited [35] concerns GaP, not ZnS, so the quantitative agreement between theory and experiment is partially circular. The absence of a power-dependence curve or background measurement for the 737 nm signal is a legitimate experimental-evidence concern, but it is a correctness issue, not a circularity issue. Overall score 3.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claim rests on standard material characterization and tensor algebra. The main free parameter is the 60% crystallite orientation fraction used to absorb the efficiency discrepancy; the Tauc-Lorentz fit parameters are also undisclosed. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Crystallite orientation fraction f = 0.6 (60%)
    Introduced in Section 5 to reconcile the measured 0.4 %/W/cm² efficiency with the single-crystal prediction of 21 %/W/cm². The fraction is not measured independently and is inferred from the efficiency discrepancy.
  • Tauc-Lorentz oscillator parameters = not reported
    Fitted to ellipsometry data in Section 2 to extract the refractive index n(λ) used in the COMSOL phase-matching prediction. This is a standard characterization fit, but the parameter values are not disclosed.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption ZnS film is predominantly cubic zinc-blende with 43m symmetry, so the only nonzero second-order tensor components are d14=d25=d36.
    XRD alone cannot exclude wurtzite because wurtzite (002) overlaps cubic (111); the paper relies on the measured bandgap of about 3.5 eV and literature to assign zinc blende, which underpins the tensor analysis in Section 3.
  • domain assumption Crystallites have a preferential [111] growth direction.
    Used to rotate the nonlinear tensor into the x', y', z' basis in Section 3. The XRD (111) peak and the slight column tilt seen in SEM support this assumption but do not prove a uniform orientation.
  • domain assumption Crystallite twist around [111] is uncontrolled and uniformly distributed over 0 to 2π, while tilt is small (less than 5°).
    Assumed in Section 3 to identify twist-invariant SHG processes. Low tilt is supported by SEM, but the twist distribution is not measured and is hypothesized from similar polycrystalline ZnO studies.
  • domain assumption The ellipsometric Tauc-Lorentz model accurately describes the ZnS refractive index used for waveguide dispersion calculations.
    The predicted phase-matching wavelength of 1480 nm in Section 5 depends on the refractive index extracted from the ellipsometry fit in Section 2.
  • domain assumption The rectangular-pulse approximation is valid for estimating instantaneous conversion efficiency from the measured average power.
    Used in Section 5 to convert the 8.2 mW, 82 MHz OPO signal into an instantaneous efficiency of 0.4 %/W/cm²; no pulse-shape characterization is reported.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Second harmonic generation in polycrystalline ZnS nanowaveguides." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UIKKEJZ6

@misc{pith2026250722667,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Second harmonic generation in polycrystalline ZnS nanowaveguides},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UIKKEJZ6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.22667}
}
read the original abstract

We report the realization of Zinc Sulfide (ZnS) nanowaveguides and the experimental observation of second harmonic generation (SHG) in such structures, demonstrating their potential for integrated nonlinear photonics. ZnS thin films were deposited via RF magnetron sputtering and characterized using atomic force microscopy (AFM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and ellipsometry. The nonlinear optical properties of these films were theoretically analyzed to assess their suitability for second-order nonlinear processes. We detail the fabrication and optical characterization of ZnS nanowaveguides, leading to the experimental observation of SHG in such structures. These findings establish ZnS as a promising platform for nonlinear photonic applications, particularly in compact and integrated frequency conversion devices. This work represents a significant step toward expanding the scope of wide bandgap semiconductors in advanced photonic technologies.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Introduction Nonlinear optical phenomena resulting from light - matter interaction have been considerably improved through the development of photonic devices based on a strong confinement of the electromagnetic field which is usually ensured by a guiding structure based on a nonlinear optical material [1] . In the context of octave - spanning spectral co...

    work page

  2. [2]

    In this study, zinc sulfide (ZnS) thin films were deposited by RF magnetron sputtering using 99.9% pure ZnS target from Kurt J

    Fabrication and characterization of sputter deposited ZnS thin films. In this study, zinc sulfide (ZnS) thin films were deposited by RF magnetron sputtering using 99.9% pure ZnS target from Kurt J. Lesker. To ensure an optimal deposition environment and high quality ZnS layers, a clean vacuum system (residual pressure in the 10 - 7 mbar range) and stable ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    ܧ ௬ " ܲ ௭

    Second harmonic generation in sputter deposited ZnS thin films. In a second - order nonlinear medium such as ZnS, the second order nonlinear polarization is defined as: ሬ ⃗ ே௅ ( ଶ ) ߳ ଴ ߯ ଶ ) ሬ ⃗ ఠ ሬ ⃗ ఠ 6 Where ߳ ଴ corresponds to the permittivity of vacuum, ߯ ଶ ) the second order susceptibility tensor and ሬ ⃗ ఠ the incident electric field. Given the Zinc...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Fabrication and linear characterization of ZnS nanowaveguides. Following the fabrication of ZnS thin films on insulator described in section 2, we proceeded to the fabrication of nanowaveguides using electron - beam lithography, patterning waveguides from 500 nm to 1µm width. ZnS waveguides are then defined using reacti ve ion etching (RIE) with a CH ₄/H₂...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Second harmonic generation experiment S econd harmonic generation is performed in the optimal TM → TM polarization configuration , defined in the orthonormal reference frame shown in figure 4.a, involving the ݀ ଷଷ ᇱᇱ element . For a waveguide 810 nm wide and 500 nm high, dispersion curves calculated for such an architecture with COMSOL show that the only ...

    work page

  6. [6]

    France 2030

    Conclusion In conclusion, we have realized the first ZnS nanowaveguides and demonstrated SHG in this platform with a first estimation of SHG conversion efficiency, marking a significant milestone in II - VI nonlinear integrated photonics. The nonlinear response of these polycrystalline waveguides has been theoretically analyzed and validated through SHG o...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Wang et al

    H. Wang et al. , « Large - scale photonic computing with nonlinear disordered media », Nat Comput Sci , vol. 4, n o 6, p. 429 ‑439, juin 2024, doi: 10.1038/s43588 - 024 - 00644 - 1

    doi:10.1038/s43588 2024

  8. [8]

    A. Dutt, A. Mohanty, A. L. Gaeta, et M. Lipson, « Nonlinear and quantum photonics using integrated optical materials », Nat Rev Mater , vol. 9, n o 5, p. 321 ‑346, mai 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41578 - 024 - 00668 - z. 15

    doi:10.1038/s41578 2024

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Boes et al

    A. Boes et al. , « Lithium niobate photonics: Unlocking the electromagnetic spectrum », Science , vol. 379, n o 6627, p. eabj4396, janv. 2023, doi: 10.1126/science.abj4396

    2023 doi

  2. [10]

    Lu et al

    J. Lu et al. , « Ultraviolet to mid - infrared supercontinuum generation in single - crystalline aluminum nitride waveguides », Opt. Lett. , vol. 45, n o 16, p. 4499, août 2020, doi: 10.1364/OL.398257

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    Wang et al

    C. Wang et al. , « Ultrahigh - efficiency wavelength conversion in nanophotonic periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides », Optica , vol. 5, n o 11, p. 1438, nov. 2018, doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.5.001438

    2018 doi

  4. [12]

    Pantzas et al

    K. Pantzas et al. , « Continuous - Wave Second - Harmonic Generation in Orientation - Patterned Gallium Phosphide Waveguides at Telecom Wavelengths », ACS Photonics , vol. 9, n o 6, p. 2032 ‑2039, juin 2022, doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.2c00156

    2022 doi

  5. [13]

    Chen et al

    J. Chen et al. , « Boosted Second Harmonic Generation and Cascaded Sum Frequency Generation from a Surface Crystallized Glass Ceramic Microcavity », Advanced Materials , vol. 36, n o 23, p. 2313219, juin 2024, doi: 10.1002/adma.202313219

    2024 doi

  6. [14]

    Saitoh, T

    T. Saitoh, T. Y. Toshiya Yokogawa, et T. N. Tadashi Narusawa, « Single - Crystalline Epitaxial ZnS Waveguides for Phase Matched Second Harmonic Generation Devices », Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. , vol. 30, n o 4R, p. 667, avr. 1991, doi: 10.1143/JJAP.30.667

    1991 doi

  7. [15]

    Ru et al

    Q. Ru et al. , « Optical parametric oscillation in a random polycrystalline medium », Optica , vol. 4, n o 6, p. 617, juin 2017, doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.4.000617

    2017 doi

  8. [16]

    Tobbeche, S

    S. Tobbeche, S. Kalache, M. Elbar, M. N. Kateb, et M. R. Serdouk, « Improvement of the CIGS solar cell performance: structure based on a ZnS buffer layer », Opt Quant Electron , vol. 51, n o 8, p. 284, août 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11082 - 019 - 2000 - z. 16

    2019 doi

  9. [17]

    Kurnia, Y

    F. Kurnia, Y. H. Ng, R. Amal, N. Valanoor, et J. N. Hart, « Defect engineering of ZnS thin films for photoelectrochemical water - splitting under visible light », Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells , vol. 153, p. 179 ‑185, ao ût 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.04.021

    2016 doi

  10. [18]

    Li et al

    Z. Li et al. , « Improve the Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production Using ZnS@ZnO Twin ‐ Junction Structure with Isoelectronic Traps », Adv Materials Inter , vol. 9, n o 20, p. 2200066, juill. 2022, doi: 10.1002/admi.202200066

    2022 doi

  11. [19]

    Fang et al

    X. Fang et al. , « An Efficient Way to Assemble ZnS Nanobelts as Ultraviolet ‐Light Sensors with Enhanced Photocurrent and Stability », Adv Funct Materials , vol. 20, n o 3, p. 500 ‑508, févr. 2010, doi: 10.1002/adfm.200901878

    2010 doi

  12. [20]

    J. A. Armstrong, N. Bloembergen, J. Ducuing, et P. S. Pershan, « Interactions between Light Waves in a Nonlinear Dielectric », Phys. Rev. , vol. 127, n o 6, p. 1918 ‑1939, sept. 1962, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.127.1918

    1918 doi

  13. [21]

    Fang et al

    X. Fang et al. , « ZnS nanostructures: From synthesis to applications », Progress in Materials Science , vol. 56, n o 2, p. 175 ‑287, févr. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.10.001

    2011 doi

  14. [22]

    H. Ito, N. Uesugi, et H. Inaba, « Phase ‐matched guided optical second harmonic wave generation in oriented ZnS polycrystalline thin ‐film waveguides », Appl. Phys. Lett. , vol. 25, n o 7, p. 385 ‑387, oct. 1974, doi: 10.1063/1.1655518

    1974 doi

  15. [23]

    Hermans, M

    A. Hermans, M. Van Daele, J. Dendooven, S. Clemmen, C. Detavernier, et R. Baets, « Integrated silicon nitride electro - optic modulators with atomic layer deposited overlays », Opt. Lett. , vol. 44, n o 5, p. 1112, mars 2019, doi: 10.1364/OL.44.001112. 17

    2019 doi

  16. [24]

    Debenham, « Refractive indices of zinc sulfide in the 0405 – 13 - μm wavelength range », Appl

    M. Debenham, « Refractive indices of zinc sulfide in the 0405 – 13 - μm wavelength range », Appl. Opt. , vol. 23, n o 14, p. 2238, juill. 1984, doi: 10.1364/AO.23.002238

    1984 doi

  17. [25]

    E. D. Palik et G. Ghosh, Handbook of optical constants of solids . San Diego: Academic Press, 1998

    1998

  18. [26]

    H. P. Wagner, M. Kühnelt, W. Langbein, et J. M. Hvam, « Dispersion of the second - order nonlinear susceptibility in ZnTe, ZnSe, and ZnS », Phys. Rev. B , vol. 58, n o 16, p. 10494 ‑ 10501, oct. 1998, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.10494

    1998 doi

  19. [27]

    T. - Y. Zhou, Y. - L. Song, J. - M. Hong, et X. - Q. Xin, « Investigation of the room - temperature solid - state reactions leading to ZnS nanotubes and the third - order nonlinear optical properties of the nanotubes obtained », Nanotechnology , vol. 16, n o 4, p. 536 ‑541, av...

    2005 doi

  20. [28]

    R. W. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics , Fourth Edition. 2020

    2020

  21. [29]

    16 mars 2023

    European Commission, Directorate - General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, « REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing a framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials a nd amending Regulat...

    2013

  22. [30]

    D. H. Hwang, J. H. Ahn, K. N. Hui, K. S. Hui, et Y. G. Son, « Structural and optical properties of ZnS thin films deposited by RF magnetron sputtering », Nanoscale Res Lett , vol. 7, n o 1, p. 26, déc. 2012, doi: 10.1186/1556 - 276X - 7 - 26

    2012 doi

  23. [31]

    Prakash, A

    D. Prakash, A. M. Aboraia, M. El - Hagary, E. R. Shaaban, et K. D. Verma, « Determination of the optical constants and film thickness of ZnTe and ZnS thin films in terms of spectrophotometric and spectroscopic ellipsometry », Ceramics International , vol. 42, n o 2, p. 2676 ‑2...

    2016 doi

  24. [32]

    ܧ ௬ " ܲ ௬

    In view of the SEM observations presented above, the crystallites appear to be only slightly tilted, but it is not possible to know whether they are reversed by 180° around the [ 1 1 ത 0 ] axis from one crystallite to the next. Figure 3 shows that for the practical case with l...

  25. [33]

    Shakoury et al

    R. Shakoury et al. , « Optical properties, microstructure, and multifractal analyses of ZnS thin films obtained by RF magnetron sputtering », J Mater Sci: Mater Electron , vol. 31, n o 7, p. 5262 ‑5273, avr. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10854 - 020 - 03086 - 3

    2020 doi

  26. [34]

    J. M. Blackmore et A. G. Cullis, « The structure of ZnS thin films deposited by r.f. sputtering », Thin Solid Films , vol. 199, n o 2, p. 321 ‑334, avr. 1991, doi: 10.1016/0040 - 6090(91)90014 - O

    1991 doi

  27. [35]

    W. M. Haynes, Éd., CRC handbook of chemistry and physics: a ready - reference book of chemical and physical data , 97th edition. Boca Raton London New York: CRC Press, 2017

    2017

  28. [36]

    Singh, R

    S. Singh, R. Kumar, T. Ganguli, R. S. Srinivasa, et S. S. Major, « High optical quality ZnO epilayers grown on sapphire substrates by reactive magnetron sputtering of zinc target », Journal of Crystal Growth , vol. 310, n o 22, p. 4640 ‑4646, nov. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro...

    2008 doi

  29. [37]

    J. H. Noh, J. - S. An, J. Y. Kim, C. M. Cho, K. S. Hong, et H. S. Jung, « Electrical and optical properties of epitaxial and polycrystalline undoped and Al - doped ZnO thin films grown by 19 pulsed laser deposition », J Electroceram , vol. 23, n o 2 ‑4, p. 497‑501, oct. 2009, ...

    2009 doi

  30. [38]

    Jacobi, J

    K. Jacobi, J. Platen, et C. Setzer, « Structure and Surface Core - Level Shifts of GaAs Surfaces Prepared by Molecular - Beam Epitaxy », phys. stat. sol. (b) , vol. 218, n o 2, p. 329 ‑364, avr. 2000, doi: 10.1002/1521 - 3951(200004)218:2<329::AID - PSSB329>3.0.CO;2 - I

    doi

  31. [39]

    Baudrier - Raybaut, R

    M. Baudrier - Raybaut, R. Haïdar, Ph. Kupecek, Ph. Lemasson, et E. Rosencher, « Random quasi - phase - matching in bulk polycrystalline isotropic nonlinear materials », Nature , vol. 432, n o 7015, p. 374 ‑376, nov. 2004, doi: 10.1038/nature03027

    2004 doi

  32. [40]

    M. M. Fejer, G. A. Magel, D. H. Jundt, et R. L. Byer, « Quasi - phase - matched second harmonic generation: tuning and tolerances », IEEE J. Quantum Electron. , vol. 28, n o 11, p. 2631 ‑2654, nov. 1992, doi: 10.1109/3.161322

    1992 doi

  33. [41]

    Combrié et al

    S. Combrié et al. , « Detailed analysis by Fabry - Perot method of slab photonic crystal line - defect waveguides and cavities in aluminium - free material system », Opt. Express , vol. 14, n o 16, p. 7353, août 2006, doi: 10.1364/OE.14.007353

    2006 doi

  34. [42]

    Guillemé et al

    P. Guillemé et al. , « Second harmonic generation in gallium phosphide microdisks on silicon: from strict $ \ bar{4}$ to random quasi - phase matching », Semiconductor Science and Technology , vol. 32, n o 6, p. 065004, mai 2017, doi: 10.1088/1361 - 6641/aa676d

    2017 doi

  35. [43]

    A. P. Anthur et al. , « Second harmonic generation in gallium phosphide nano - waveguides », Opt. Express , vol. 29, n o 7, p. 10307, mars 2021, doi: 10.1364/OE.409758

    2021 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.