Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Foundation Models for Clean Energy Forecasting: A Comprehensive Review

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This review argues that large pretrained foundation models are becoming the practical route to accurate, adaptable wind and solar forecasting.

desk verdict Useful survey skeleton, but its central performance numbers are untraceable to the cited sources, so it is not yet a reliable map of the field. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.23147 v1 pith:GNJHTCXS submitted 2025-07-30 eess.SY cs.SY

Md Meftahul Ferdaus , Tanmoy Dam , Md Rasel Sarkar , Moslem Uddin , Sreenatha G. Anavatti This is my paper
classification eess.SYcs.SY
keywords FoundationmodelsRenewableenergyWindpowerforecastingSolarpredictionDeeplearningTimeseriesTransformersTransfer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Reviewing roughly 250 studies, this paper argues that foundation models—large transformer-based models pre-trained on diverse time-series data—are a practical step forward for wind and solar forecasting. It claims these models match or beat task-specific models trained from scratch, especially as input context grows, while adding zero-shot adaptation, multi-scale and multi-task forecasting, and probabilistic outputs. The cited evidence includes a 15–20% error reduction in solar forecasting with Chronos, an 8% improvement in wind power prediction with Lag-Llama, and a 30% speed advantage over numerical weather prediction for Aurora at comparable accuracy. The paper concludes that foundation models provide a unified, adaptable approach with the accuracy and reliability needed for operational decisions, which matters because grid operators managing intermittent renewables need forecasts that are both accurate and cheap to deploy across many assets.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the time-series foundation model: a large transformer pre-trained on massive, heterogeneous time-series corpora and adapted to downstream tasks. The review's taxonomy organizes these models by architecture (transformer, graph, hybrid), pre-training objective (generative, masked, contrastive), and adaptation method (zero-shot, full fine-tuning, parameter-efficient fine-tuning such as LoRA and adapters, and prompting). The transferable temporal representations learned during pre-training are what let one model serve many wind, solar, and load forecasting tasks with little or no task-specific data.

What would settle it

A replication study that runs Chronos, Lag-Llama, TimesFM, TimeGPT-1, and Aurora together with a well-tuned LSTM or trained-from-scratch transformer on the same wind and solar datasets, at matched input lengths, and finds no accuracy advantage for the foundation models would falsify the review's central comparative claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that time-series foundation models—transformers pretrained on large, heterogeneous collections of time-series data—perform at least as well as, and in several cited cases better than, models trained from scratch for renewable forecasting. The review's evidence base is a comparison of model families: Chronos cuts solar forecasting error by 15–20%, Lag-Llama improves wind power prediction by 8%, TimesFM reaches near-fully-trained accuracy in zero-shot settings, and Aurora forecasts about 30% faster than numerical weather prediction with comparable accuracy. These results are used to argue that foundation models unify clean energy forecasting: one pretrained model can adapt to diverse tasks, integrate weather, satellite, sensor, and grid data, and output probabilistic forecasts that support risk-aware grid operations.

Load-bearing premise

The review's conclusions stand on the accuracy of the quantitative results it reports from cited studies—especially the 15–20% solar error reduction for Chronos and the 8% wind improvement for Lag-Llama—because the review itself adds no new experiments.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single pretrained foundation model could replace many bespoke forecasters, so a utility would fine-tune one model for wind, solar, and load across regions instead of retraining from scratch.
  • Zero-shot forecasting would give usable predictions for new solar farms or wind plants with little or no local history, shortening the deployment cycle for new renewable assets.
  • Probabilistic and scenario-based outputs would let operators size operating reserves and hedge market positions using forecast distributions rather than single point estimates.
  • Parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods such as LoRA and adapters would make large pretrained models usable by organizations with modest compute and limited labeled data.
  • The reported scaling behavior suggests that expanding pretraining data and model size will continue to improve renewable forecasting accuracy, with diminishing returns at very large scales.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The practical payoff of the reported gains would show up mostly in faster deployment and lower reserve costs, not just in smaller error metrics, because zero-shot and probabilistic outputs change how forecasts are used operationally.
  • The taxonomy implies a testable extension: an energy-specific pretraining corpus enriched with synthetic extreme events should improve tail-risk forecasting more than a generic time-series corpus of the same size.
  • An independent head-to-head benchmark on standardized wind and solar datasets, with matched input lengths and retraining budgets, would be needed to confirm the 15–20% solar and 8% wind figures the review cites.
  • The convergence toward graph-based, physics-informed, and multi-task architectures suggests the next generation of energy foundation models will combine physical constraints with learned representations rather than using pure sequence transformers.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a systematic literature review of foundation models (FMs) for clean energy forecasting, focusing on wind and solar but also covering electricity load. It surveys roughly 218 references, proposes a taxonomy based on architecture, pre-training paradigm, adaptation method, and data modality, and reviews modeling innovations, uncertainty quantification, interpretability, and computational efficiency. The review contains no new experiments; its central conclusion, stated in Section 7, is that FMs 'represent a significant step forward' for operational renewable forecasting. The quantitative evidence for this conclusion comes primarily from Section 3.3 and Table 1, which report specific performance improvements for Chronos, Lag-Llama, TimesFM, TimeGPT-1, Aurora, GridFM, and physics-informed FMs.

Significance. If the survey's comparative claims are accurate and traceable, the paper would be a useful synthesis and taxonomy for a fast-moving area, and its catalog of challenges and future directions would be of value to practitioners. The review is strongest as an organizing framework: it covers architectural variants, pre-training objectives, fine-tuning methods, data fusion strategies, uncertainty quantification, interpretability, and scalability, and it gives explicit credit to recent primary sources. However, the headline conclusion depends on quantitative performance claims in Table 1 and Section 3.3 that are not tied to specific findings in the cited papers, and the search protocol is not reproducible as reported. Because the review adds no new empirical evidence, the significance of the central claim is currently conditional on source verification.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.3 and Table 1] The central quantitative evidence for the review's conclusion consists of the entries in Table 1: Chronos reduces solar forecasting error by 15-20%, Lag-Llama improves wind power prediction by 8%, Aurora is 30% faster than NWP, and similar claims for TimesFM, TimeGPT-1, GridFM, and physics-informed FMs. The table gives only model-level citations, not per-claim sources, and the text in Section 3.3 repeats these numbers without any additional reference. As far as I can determine from the cited preprints, these specific results are not reported there: Chronos (Ansari et al., arXiv:2403.07815) evaluates on general time-series benchmarks rather than solar forecasting, Lag-Llama (Rasul et al., arXiv:2310.08278) does not report an 8% wind improvement, and Aurora (Bodnar et al., arXiv:2405.13063) does not state a '30% faster than NWP' result. Since Section 7's conclusion rests on these numbers and the manuscript adds no experiments, the evidentiary basis of the headline claim is currently unsupported. Each quantitative entry should be replaced with a verifiable, per-claim citation (including dataset, baseline, and metric), or the quantitative claims should be removed and the table relabeled as a qualitative summary.
  2. [§3.2, §4.1, §4.2] The definition of 'FM' is internally inconsistent and one key citation is misassigned. Section 3.2 introduces 'Finite mixture (FM) models' in the context of TimeGPT-1, Chronos, and Time-MoE, which contradicts the abstract and the remainder of the manuscript, where FM stands for 'Foundation Model.' In addition, Section 4.1 attributes TimeGPT-1's cross-domain generalization to reference [65] (Hou et al., 2025), and Section 4.2 again cites [65] for encoder-decoder transformer structures 'such TimeGPT-1.' Reference [65] is a paper on transformer load forecasting and overload detection, not the TimeGPT-1 paper, which is correctly cited as [34] (Garza et al., 2023) in Section 3.1. These errors place claims about a flagship model on the wrong source and need correction.
  3. [§2.1–§2.3] The methodology section presents the review as a systematic literature review but omits the information needed to reproduce it. The text states that 'approximately 250 publications' were included, yet the reference list contains 218 entries; no PRISMA-style stage-by-stage counts, database-specific query strings, deduplication numbers, or screening/exclusion totals are provided. Section 2.1 lists keyword sets but not the full Boolean queries, and Section 2.3 does not report how many records were screened at each stage. This is not merely a formatting issue: the review's usefulness as a systematic synthesis depends on the completeness and reproducibility of the search, and the current description does not support the claimed scale of the corpus.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§5.3] The sentence 'A case study from a grid operator showed that a hybrid machine learning model ... could reduce the day ahead forecasting mean absolute error (MAE) by 20%' provides no citation for the case study; please add a source or remove the specific percentage. The same paragraph's claim about FMs trained on global reanalysis data would also benefit from a supporting reference.
  2. [§4.4] 'Rasoul et al. said that fine-tuning Lag-Llama...' should read 'Rasul et al.'; the name is spelled correctly in reference [78].
  3. [§3.3] The sentence 'it can transfer common temporal properties (that after 8-10 years - all interruptions - still relative to past years) to the new task [77]' is unclear and should be rewritten; as written it is difficult to identify the intended claim about temporal transfer.
  4. [Figure 3] Figure 3 is described as a 'Comparative Analysis of Forecasting Approaches' and displays a heatmap of 'key performance metrics,' but no underlying data, evaluation protocol, or source is given. If the figure is a schematic, it should be labeled as such; if it is empirical, it needs a source or a reference to the benchmark from which the values are taken.
  5. [§3.2] There is a typographical error in 'even greater capacity' rendered as 'evengreater capacity'; please fix throughout the manuscript, where similar spacing errors appear (e.g., 'di fferent', 'o ffers', 'e ffective').

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the review synthesizes external literature with no self-referential derivation chain.

full rationale

This paper is a literature review, not a derivation or modeling study. Its central claims (e.g., FMs improve renewable forecasting accuracy, Chronos reduces solar error, Lag-Llama improves wind prediction) are presented as summaries of cited external works, and the paper adds no new experiments or fitted parameters. There is no evidence of the authors citing their own prior work, no imported uniqueness theorem, and no ansatz smuggled in via self-citation. The closest issues are traceability and fidelity concerns: Table 1 lacks per-claim citations, the claimed ~250 included studies exceeds the 218 listed references, the Section 3.2 definition of FM as 'Finite mixture' is a technical error, and the specific performance numbers attributed to Chronos, Lag-Llama, and Aurora may not be verifiable in the cited primary papers. These are soundness, accuracy, and reporting-integrity concerns, not circularity: none of the review's conclusions are equivalent by construction to its inputs, and no load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation or a fitted quantity renamed as a prediction. Under the hard rules requiring an explicit reduction (Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction, or fitted parameter renamed as prediction) no such reduction can be exhibited, so the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is a survey, so it introduces no free parameters and no invented entities. The ledger records the review's dependence on three things: faithful reading of its sources, completeness of its search, and adequacy of its taxonomy axes. Any of these failing would invalidate the survey's conclusions.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The cited primary literature supports the specific findings attributed to it in the survey, especially the quantitative performance numbers in Table 1.
    The review's comparative claims rest on its summaries of Chronos, Lag-Llama, TimesFM, TimeGPT-1, Aurora, and GridFM; no per-claim citations are given for the Table 1 numbers, so the survey presupposes these are accurate readings of the sources.
  • domain assumption The keyword-based search over Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, Google Scholar, and arXiv from 2016 to 2024 captured the relevant literature.
    Section 2 describes the search but provides no full query strings, search dates, or stage-by-stage screening counts, so the review's completeness claim cannot be independently audited.
  • domain assumption The chosen taxonomy dimensions, architecture, pre-training paradigm, adaptation method, and application domain, are the appropriate organizing axes for this literature.
    Section 4.1 asserts this classification without comparing it to alternative survey structures, several of which the paper itself cites, such as Liang et al. 2024.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Foundation Models for Clean Energy Forecasting: A Comprehensive Review." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GNJHTCXS

@misc{pith2026250723147,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Foundation Models for Clean Energy Forecasting: A Comprehensive Review},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GNJHTCXS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.23147}
}
read the original abstract

As global energy systems transit to clean energy, accurate renewable generation and renewable demand forecasting is imperative for effective grid management. Foundation Models (FMs) can help improve forecasting of renewable generation and demand because FMs can rapidly process complex, high-dimensional time-series data. This review paper focuses on FMs in the realm of renewable energy forecasting, primarily focusing on wind and solar. We present an overview of the architectures, pretraining strategies, finetuning methods, and types of data used in the context of renewable energy forecasting. We emphasize the role of models that are trained at a large scale, domain specific Transformer architectures, where attention is paid to spatial temporal correlations, the embedding of domain knowledge, and also the brief and intermittent nature of renewable generation. We assess recent FM based advancements in forecast accuracy such as reconciling predictions over multiple time scales and quantifying uncertainty in renewable energy forecasting. We also review existing challenges and areas of improvement in long-term and multivariate time series forecasting. In this survey, a distinction between theory and practice is established regarding the use of FMs in the clean energy forecasting domain. Additionally, it critically assesses the strengths and weaknesses of FMs while advancing future research direction in this new and exciting area of forecasting.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.23147 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Evolution of Forecasting Models in Clean Energy Applications [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Systematic Literature Review Process for Foundation Models in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparative Analysis of Forecasting Approaches for Clean Energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Classification Framework for FMs in Clean Energy Forecasting. This [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Multi-Modal Data Fusion Architecture for Clean Energy Forecasting. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Uncertainty Quantification Methods in FMs for Energy Forecasting. The left panel presents a framework for di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Interpretability Techniques for FMs in Energy Forecasting. The figure illustrates attention visualization (top-left), feature importance analysis (top-right), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. FETS Benchmark: Foundation Models Enable Scalable and Generalizable Energy Time Series Forecasting

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Foundation models outperform dataset-specific machine learning in energy time series forecasting across 54 datasets in 9 categories.

  2. FETS Benchmark: Foundation Models Enable Scalable and Generalizable Energy Time Series Forecasting

    cs.LG 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Covariate-informed zero-shot time-series foundation models beat task-specifically tuned XGBoost and random forests in aggregate on a 54-dataset energy forecasting benchmark.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

216 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [65]

    Y . Hou, C. Ma, X. Li, Y . Sun, H. Yu, Z. Fang, Time series foundation model for improved transformer load forecasting and overload detection, Energies 18 (3) (2025) 660

    2025

  2. [34]

    Garza, C

    A. Garza, C. Challu, M. Mergenthaler-Canseco, Timegpt-1, ArXiv (2023)

    2023

  3. [1]

    O. Mane, A. Zagade, S. Sonpatki, S. Chavan, K. Nimbalkar, Forecasting renewable energy production using ai-based weather prediction models, International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research (2024). doi:10. 36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i03.21917

    2024

  4. [2]

    X. Zhou, J. Ye, S. Zhao, M. Jin, Z. Hou, C.-S. Yang, Z. Li, Y . Wen, X. Yuan, Towards universal large-scale foundational model for nat- ural gas demand forecasting, ArXiv abs /2409.15794 (2024). doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.15794

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.15794 2024

  5. [3]

    Z. Li, X. Qiu, P. Chen, Y . Wang, H. Cheng, Y . Shu, J. Hu, C. Guo, A. Zhou, Q. Wen, C. S. Jensen, B. Yang, Foundts: Comprehensive and unified benchmarking of foundation models for time series forecasting (2024)

    2024

  6. [4]

    Sergeev, P

    N. Sergeev, P. Matrenin, A review of international experi- ence in forecasting renewable energy generation using ma- chine learning methods, iPolytech Journal (2023). doi: 10.21285/1814-3520-2023-2-354-369

    work page doi:10.21285/1814-3520-2023-2-354-369 2023

  7. [5]

    Jung, D.-H

    A.-H. Jung, D.-H. Lee, J.-Y . Kim, C. K. Kim, H.-G. Kim, Y .-S. Lee, Re- gional photovoltaic power forecasting using vector autoregression model in south korea, Energies (2022). doi:10.3390/en15217853

    work page doi:10.3390/en15217853 2022

  8. [6]

    Zou, Survey of wind power output power forecasting technology, Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology (2023)

    Y . Zou, Survey of wind power output power forecasting technology, Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology (2023). doi:10. 54097/hset.v50i.8490

    2023

Show all 216 references
  1. [7]

    Alpackaya, M

    I. Alpackaya, M. H. Fallah, N. Mounika, S. Sood, S. Rajvanshi, S. Lakhanpal, P. Cajla, A. Sharma, Y . S. Lalitha, Renewable energy fore- casting using deep learning techniques, E3S Web of Conferences (2024). doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202458101011

    2024

  2. [8]

    N. E. Benti, M. D. Chaka, A. Semie, Forecasting renewable energy gen- eration with machine learning and deep learning: Current advances and future prospects, Sustainability (2023). doi:10.3390/su15097087

    2023 doi

  3. [9]

    T. S. Pham, D. Nguyen, N. D. M. Phan, Wind energy forecasting: A comparative analysis of machine learning approaches, in: 2023 8th International Scientific Conference on Applying New Technology in Green Buildings (ATiGB), 2023, pp. 195–200. doi:10.1109/ ATiGB59969.2023.10364510

    2023

  4. [10]

    K. E. Bassey, Solar energy forecasting with deep learning technique, Engineering Science & Technology Journal (2023). doi:10.51594/ estj.v4i2.1286

    2023

  5. [11]

    Mohan, R

    L. Mohan, R. Durga, Evaluation of renewable energy forecasting (ref) technique using by machine learning, in: 2023 International Con- ference on New Frontiers in Communication, Automation, Manage- ment and Security (ICCAMS), V ol. 1, 2023, pp. 1–8. doi:10.1109/ ICCAMS60113.202...

    2023

  6. [12]

    Saeed, S

    F. Saeed, S. Aldera, Adaptive renewable energy forecasting utiliz- ing a data-driven pca-transformer architecture, IEEE Access 12 (2024) 109269–109280. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3440226

    2024

  7. [13]

    M. J. Walczewski, H. W ¨ohrle, Prediction of electricity generation using onshore wind and solar energy in germany, Energies (2024). doi:10. 3390/en17040844

    2024

  8. [14]

    Ghazaei, O

    E. Ghazaei, O. Feizi, A. Ghavifekr, M. Salim, A. Hassanzadeh, Wind farm power prediction with transformer encoder, in: 2024 9th Interna- tional Conference on Technology and Energy Management (ICTEM), 2024, pp. 1–5. doi:10.1109/ICTEM60690.2024.10631900

    2024

  9. [15]

    X. Dai, G. Liu, W. Hu, Z. Lei, H. Zhou, Learning from chatgpt: A transformer-based model for wind power forecasting, in: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2023 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC / I&CPS Eur...

    2023

  10. [16]

    H. Han, X. Liang, K. Zhu, Multi-modal transformer-based wind power prediction by utilizing heterogeneous sources 13159 (2024) 131591H – 131591H–6. doi:10.1117/12.3024579

    2024 doi

  11. [17]

    Ghasemi, M

    A. Ghasemi, M. Hashemi, Harnessing the power of transformer learning with long-term memory for renewable energy forecasting, 2023 IEEE Virtual Conference on Communications (VCC) (2023) 171–176 doi: 10.1109/VCC60689.2023.10475044

    2023

  12. [18]

    Zeng, M.-H

    A. Zeng, M.-H. Chen, L. Zhang, Q. Xu, Are transformers e ffective for time series forecasting?, ArXiv abs /2205.13504 (2022). doi:10. 48550/arXiv.2205.13504

    2022 doi arXiv

  13. [19]

    Joseph, A

    S. Joseph, A. A. Jo, E. D. Raj, Improving time series forecasting accu- racy with transformers: A comprehensive analysis with explainability, in: 2024 Third International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, In- formation and Communication Technologies (ICEEICT), 2024, pp. 1...

    2024

  14. [20]

    Rasul, A

    K. Rasul, A. Ashok, A. R. Williams, A. Khorasani, G. Adamopou- los, R. Bhagwatkar, M. Bilovs, H. Ghonia, N. Hassen, A. Schneider, S. Garg, A. Drouin, N. Chapados, Y . Nevmyvaka, I. Rish, Lag-llama: Towards foundation models for probabilistic time series forecasting, ArXiv abs/...

    2023 doi arXiv

  15. [21]

    A. Das, W. Kong, R. Sen, Y . Zhou, A decoder-only foundation model for time-series forecasting, arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.10688 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  16. [23]

    M. K. Bharti, R. Wadhvani, M. Gyanchandani, M. Gupta, Transformer- based multivariate time series forecasting, in: 2024 IEEE International Students’ Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Sci- ence (SCEECS), 2024, pp. 1–6. doi:10.1109/SCEECS61402.2024. 10482217

    2024 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Uremovi ´c, M

    N. Uremovi ´c, M. Bizjak, P. Sukiˇc, G. ˇStumberger, B. ˇZalik, N. Lukaˇc, A new framework for multivariate time series forecasting in energy man- agement system, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 14 (2023) 2934–

    2023

  18. [27]

    Mundotiya, P

    P. Mundotiya, P. Mathuria, H. Tiwari, Comprehensive review on un- certainty in wind power forecasting-models and challenges, in: 2022 2nd International Conference on Innovative Sustainable Computational Technologies (CISCT), 2022, pp. 1–6. doi:10.1109/CISCT55310. 2022.10046605

    2022

  19. [28]

    Borrotti, Quantifying uncertainty with conformal prediction for heat- 22 ing and cooling load forecasting in building performance simulation, En- ergies (2024)

    M. Borrotti, Quantifying uncertainty with conformal prediction for heat- 22 ing and cooling load forecasting in building performance simulation, En- ergies (2024). doi:10.3390/en17174348

    2024 doi

  20. [29]

    Bommasani, D

    R. Bommasani, D. A. Hudson, E. Adeli, R. Altman, S. Arora, S. von Arx, M. S. Bernstein, J. Bohg, A. Bosselut, E. Brunskill, et al., On the opportunities and risks of foundation models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07258 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  21. [30]

    Germ ´an-Morales, A

    M. Germ ´an-Morales, A. Rivera-Rivas, M. D ´ıaz, C. Carmona, Transfer learning with foundational models for time series forecasting using low- rank adaptations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.11539 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  22. [31]

    Liang, H

    Y . Liang, H. Wen, Y . Nie, Y . Jiang, M. Jin, D. Song, S. Pan, Q. Wen, Foundation models for time series analysis: A tutorial and survey, in: Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge dis- covery and data mining, 2024, pp. 6555–6565

    2024

  23. [32]

    Meyer, D

    M. Meyer, D. Zapata, S. Kaltenpoth, O. Mueller, Benchmarking time series foundation models for short-term household electricity load fore- casting, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.09487 (2024)

    2024

  24. [33]

    A. F. Ansari, L. Stella, C. Turkmen, X. Zhang, P. Mercado, H. Shen, O. Shchur, S. S. Rangapuram, S. P. Arango, S. Kapoor, et al., Chronos: Learning the language of time series, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.07815 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  25. [35]

    Dalal, R

    L. Dalal, R. Verma, R. Chahar, Beyond words: Adapting nlp method- ologies for time series forecasting challenges, in: 2023 4th Interna- tional Conference on Intelligent Technologies (CONIT), 2024, pp. 1–8. doi:10.1109/CONIT61985.2024.10627058

    2023

  26. [36]

    L. Yang, Y . Wang, X. Fan, I. Cohen, Y . Zhao, Z. Zhang, Vitime: A visual intelligence-based foundation model for time series forecasting, ArXiv abs/2407.07311 (2024). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2407.07311

    2024 doi

  27. [37]

    H. Chai, S. Zhang, X. Qi, Y . Li, Fomo: A foundation model for mobile traffic forecasting with diffusion model, ArXiv (2024)

    2024

  28. [38]

    Makridakis, M

    S. Makridakis, M. Hibon, Arma models and the box–jenkins methodol- ogy, Journal of forecasting 16 (3) (1997) 147–163

    1997

  29. [39]

    J. H. Stock, M. W. Watson, Vector autoregressions, Journal of Economic perspectives 15 (4) (2001) 101–115

    2001

  30. [40]

    Lerch, B

    S. Lerch, B. Schulz, M. E. Ayari, S. Baran, Post-processing numerical weather prediction ensembles for probabilistic solar irradiance forecast- ing, Solar Energy (2021). doi:10.1016/J.SOLENER.2021.03.023

    2021 doi

  31. [41]

    Wu, Y .-C

    Y .-K. Wu, Y .-C. Wu, J.-S. Hong, L. T. Phan, Q. Phan, Probabilistic forecast of wind power generation with data processing and numeri- cal weather predictions, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 57 (2021) 36–45. doi:10.1109/TIA.2020.3037264

    2021

  32. [42]

    Vennila, S

    A. Vennila, S. Balambigai, P. V , S. U. P, V . Kavyashree, M. Jinisha, Pre- dicting solar and wind power production with the weather map data ap- proach, in: 2024 International Conference on Signal Processing, Com- putation, Electronics, Power and Telecommunication (IConSCEPT)...

    2024

  33. [43]

    Kumhar, A

    B. Kumhar, A. Saxena, M. Nagar, Advanced threat intelligence fore- casting using machine learning algorithms, in: 2023 IEEE International Conference on ICT in Business Industry & Government (ICTBIG), 2023, pp. 1–7. doi:10.1109/ICTBIG59752.2023.10456004

    2023

  34. [44]

    Andrews, O

    J. Andrews, O. Gkountouna, E. Blaisten-Barojas, Forecasting molecular dynamics energetics of polymers in solution from supervised machine learning, Chemical Science 13 (2022) 7021–7033. doi:10.1039/ d2sc01216b

    2022

  35. [45]

    Ayyıldız, Prediction of stock market index movements with machine learning (2023)

    N. Ayyıldız, Prediction of stock market index movements with machine learning (2023). doi:10.58830/ozgur.pub354

    2023 doi

  36. [46]

    Moraitis, L

    N. Moraitis, L. Tsipi, D. V ouyioukas, Machine-learning-based path loss prediction for in-cabin wireless networks, in: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning for Communication and Networking (ICMLCN), 2024, pp. 393–398. doi:10.1109/ICMLCN59089.2024. 10624765

    2024

  37. [47]

    Deep, Advanced financial market forecasting: integrating monte carlo simulations with ensemble machine learning models, Quantitative Finance and Economics (2024)

    A. Deep, Advanced financial market forecasting: integrating monte carlo simulations with ensemble machine learning models, Quantitative Finance and Economics (2024). doi:10.3934/qfe.2024011

    2024 doi

  38. [48]

    Hochreiter, Long short-term memory, Neural Computation MIT-Press (1997)

    S. Hochreiter, Long short-term memory, Neural Computation MIT-Press (1997)

    1997

  39. [49]

    Muza ffar, A

    S. Muza ffar, A. Afshari, Short-term load forecasts using lstm networks, Energy Procedia 158 (2019) 2922–2927

    2019

  40. [50]

    Eua-Arporn, S.-L

    B. Eua-Arporn, S.-L. Huang, E. Kuruoglu, Enhancing neural network based hybrid learning with empirical wavelet transform for time se- ries forecasting, in: 2021 IEEE 33rd International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI), 2021, pp. 386–390.doi:10.1109/ ICT...

    2021

  41. [51]

    Ghide, S

    L. Ghide, S. Wei, Y . Ding, Comparative study of wavelet-sarima and emd-sarima for forecasting daily temperature series, Interna- tional Journal of Analysis and Applications (2022). doi:10.28924/ 2291-8639-20-2022-17

    2022

  42. [52]

    J. Wang, X. Peng, J. Wu, Y . Ding, B. Ali, Y . Luo, Y . Hu, K. Zhang, Sin- gular spectrum analysis-based hybrid models for emergency ambulance demand time series forecasting, IMA Journal of Management Mathe- matics (2023). doi:10.1093/imaman/dpad019

    2023 doi

  43. [53]

    Li, C.-A

    T.-L. Li, C.-A. Tsai, A new strategy of hybrid models using arima, ann, and dwt in time series modelling, in: Journal of Statistics: Advances in Theory and Applications, 2021. doi:doi.org/10.18642/jsata_ 7100122182

    2021 doi

  44. [54]

    Darmawan, D

    G. Darmawan, D. Rosadi, B. N. Ruchjana, Hybrid model of singular spectrum analysis and arima for seasonal time series data, CAUCHY (2022). doi:10.18860/ca.v7i2.14136

    2022 doi

  45. [55]

    Weerasinghe, R

    C. Weerasinghe, R. Loaiza-Maya, G. Martin, D. T. Frazier, Abc-based forecasting in state space models (2023)

    2023

  46. [56]

    Ahmad, N

    T. Ahmad, N. Zhou, Ensemble methods for probabilistic solar power forecasting: A comparative study, in: 2023 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM), 2023, pp. 1–5. doi:10.1109/ PESGM52003.2023.10253133

    2023

  47. [57]

    Jensen, F

    V . Jensen, F. Bianchi, S. Anfinsen, Ensemble conformalized quantile regression for probabilistic time series forecasting, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems PP (2022). doi:10.1109/ TNNLS.2022.3217694

    2022

  48. [58]

    Doubleday, S

    K. Doubleday, S. Jascourt, W. Kleiber, B. Hodge, Probabilistic so- lar power forecasting using bayesian model averaging, IEEE Transac- tions on Sustainable Energy 12 (2021) 325–337. doi:10.1109/TSTE. 2020.2993524

    2021

  49. [59]

    Altho ff, J

    S. Altho ff, J. H. Szabadv’ary, J. Anderson, L. Carlsson, Evaluation of conformal-based probabilistic forecasting methods for short-term wind speed forecasting, 2023, pp. 100–115

    2023

  50. [60]

    H. Wu, J. Xu, J. Wang, M. Long, Autoformer: Decomposition trans- formers with auto-correlation for long-term series forecasting, ArXiv abs/2106.13008 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  51. [61]

    Laborda, S

    J. Laborda, S. Ruano, I. Zamanillo, Multi-country and multi-horizon gdp forecasting using temporal fusion transformers, SSRN Electronic Jour- nal (2023). doi:10.2139/ssrn.4329721

    2023 doi

  52. [62]

    C. Ying, J. Lu, Tfeformer: Temporal feature enhanced transformer for multivariate time series forecasting, IEEE Access 12 (2024) 153694– 153708. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3480953

    2024

  53. [63]

    Oliveira, P

    J. Oliveira, P. Ramos, Evaluating the e ffectiveness of time series trans- formers for demand forecasting in retail, Mathematics (2024). doi: 10.3390/math12172728

    2024 doi

  54. [64]

    Shabani, A

    A. Shabani, A. Abdi, L. Meng, T. Sylvain, Scaleformer: Iterative multi-scale refining transformers for time series forecasting, ArXiv abs/2206.04038 (2022). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2206.04038

    2022 doi arXiv

  55. [66]

    X. Shi, S. Wang, Y . Nie, D. Li, Z. Ye, Q. Wen, M. Jin, Time-moe: Billion-scale time series foundation models with mixture of experts, ArXiv abs/2409.16040 (2024). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2409.16040

    2024 doi arXiv

  56. [67]

    Panja, T

    M. Panja, T. Chakraborty, U. Kumar, A. Hadid, Parnn: A probabilis- tic autoregressive neural network framework for accurate forecasting (2022)

    2022

  57. [68]

    Evseenkov, D

    A. Evseenkov, D. K. Kuchkildin, K. I. Krechetov, S. A. Ospishchev, V . Kotezhekov, E. Yudin, Short-term forecasting of well production based on a hybrid probabilistic approach, Day 2 Wed, October 13, 2021 (2021). doi:10.2118/206519-ms

    2021 doi

  58. [69]

    R. Garg, S. Barpanda, S. GirishRaoSalankeN, S. Ramya, Machine learning algorithms for time series analysis and forecasting, ArXiv abs/2211.14387 (2022). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2211.14387

    2022 doi arXiv

  59. [70]

    J. Wang, X. Wang, J. Guan, L. Zhang, T. Chang, W. Yu, St-transnet: A spatiotemporal transformer network for uncertainty estimation from a single deterministic precipitation forecast, Monthly Weather Review (2024). doi:10.1175/mwr-d-23-0097.1

    2024 doi

  60. [71]

    Phan, Y .-K

    Q.-T. Phan, Y .-K. Wu, Q. Phan, A hybrid wind power forecasting model 23 with xgboost, data preprocessing considering di fferent nwps, Applied Sciences (2021). doi:10.3390/APP11031100

    2021 doi

  61. [72]

    B. Deng, K. Jia, Universal domain adaptation from foundation models, ArXiv abs/2305.11092 (2023). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2305.11092

    2023 doi arXiv

  62. [73]

    Z. X. Conti, R. Choudhary, L. Magri, A physics-based domain adapta- tion framework for modeling and forecasting building energy systems, ArXiv abs/2208.09456 (2022). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2208.09456

    2022 doi arXiv

  63. [74]

    X. Fang, G. Gong, G. Li, L. Chun, W. Li, P. Peng, A hybrid deep transfer learning strategy for short term cross-building energy prediction, Energy 215 (2021) 119208. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.119208

    2021

  64. [75]

    J. Gao, W. Hu, D. Zhang, Y . Chen, Tgdlf2.0: Theory-guided deep- learning for electrical load forecasting via transformer and transfer learn- ing, ArXiv abs /2210.02448 (2022). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2210. 02448

    2022 doi arXiv

  65. [76]

    hong Gao, Y

    Y . hong Gao, Y . Wang, Q. Wang, Improving the transferability of time series forecasting with decomposition adaptation, ArXiv abs/2307.00066 (2023). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2307.00066

    2023 doi arXiv

  66. [77]

    Spencer, S

    R. Spencer, S. Ranathunga, M. Boulic, A. van Heerden, T. Susn- jak, Transfer learning on transformers for building energy consump- tion forecasting–a comparative study, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.14107 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  67. [78]

    Rasul, A

    K. Rasul, A. Ashok, A. R. Williams, A. Khorasani, G. Adamopoulos, R. Bhagwatkar, M. Bilo ˇs, H. Ghonia, N. Hassen, A. Schneider, et al., Lag-llama: Towards foundation models for time series forecasting, in: R0-FoMo: Robustness of Few-shot and Zero-shot Learning in Large Founda...

    2023

  68. [79]

    Bodnar, W

    C. Bodnar, W. P. Bruinsma, A. Lucic, M. Stanley, J. Brandstetter, P. Gar- van, M. Riechert, J. Weyn, H. Dong, A. Vaughan, et al., Aurora: A foundation model of the atmosphere, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.13063 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  69. [80]

    H. F. Hamann, T. Brunschwiler, B. Gjorgiev, L. S. A. Martins, A. Puech, A. Varbella, J. Weiss, J. Bernab´e-Moreno, A. B. Mass’e, S. Choi, I. Fos- ter, B. Hodge, R. Jain, K. Kim, V . Mai, F. Miralles, M. D. Montigny, O. Ramos-Lea ˜nos, H. Supr ˆeme, L. Xie, E.-N. S. Youssef, A....

    2024 doi arXiv

  70. [81]

    Farhadloo, A

    M. Farhadloo, A. Sharma, M. Yang, B. Jayaprakash, W. Northrop, S. Shekhar, Towards physics-guided foundation models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.15013 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  71. [82]

    Huang, J

    M. Huang, J. Yin, Research on adversarial domain adaptation method and its application in power load forecasting, Mathematics (2022).doi: 10.3390/math10183223

    2022 doi

  72. [83]

    Schreiber, B

    J. Schreiber, B. Sick, Model selection, adaptation, and combination for transfer learning in wind and photovoltaic power forecasts, Energy and AI (2022). doi:10.1016/j.egyai.2023.100249

    2022

  73. [84]

    Tortora, F

    M. Tortora, F. Conte, G. Natrella, P. Soda, Matnet: Multi-level fusion and self-attention transformer-based model for multivariate multi-step day-ahead pv generation forecasting, arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.10356 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  74. [85]

    Cheng, K

    J. Cheng, K. Huang, Z. Zheng, Fitting imbalanced uncertainties in multi- output time series forecasting, ACM Transactions on Knowledge Dis- covery from Data (2023). doi:10.1145/3584704

    2023 doi

  75. [86]

    J. Deng, X. Chen, R. Jiang, X. Song, I. Tsang, A multi-view multi- task learning framework for multi-variate time series forecasting, ArXiv abs/2109.01657 (2021). doi:10.1109/tkde.2022.3218803

    2021 arXiv

  76. [87]

    L. Li, Y . Dai, Z. Wei, S. Wei, Y . Zhang, N. Wei, Q. Li, Enforc- ing water balance in multitask deep learning models for hydrologi- cal forecasting, Journal of Hydrometeorology (2024). doi:10.1175/ jhm-d-23-0073.1

    2024

  77. [88]

    Nikentari, H.-L

    N. Nikentari, H.-L. Wei, Multi-task learning for time series forecasting using narmax-lstm, 2022 27th International Conference on Automation and Computing (ICAC) (2022) 1–6 doi:10.1109/ICAC55051.2022. 9911071

    2022

  78. [89]

    Mendis, M

    K. Mendis, M. Wickramasinghe, P. Marasinghe, Multivariate time series forecasting: A review, Proceedings of the 2024 2nd Asia Conference on Computer Vision, Image Processing and Pattern Recognition (2024). doi:10.1145/3663976.3664241

    2024

  79. [90]

    Patil, K

    A. Patil, K. Kulkarni, A hybrid machine learning - numerical weather prediction approach for day ahead solar irradiance prediction, in: 2024 IEEE 4th International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Fu- ture Electric Transportation (SEFET), 2024, pp. 1–6. doi:10.1109/ SEFET6...

    2024

  80. [91]

    Bellinguer, R

    K. Bellinguer, R. Girard, G. Bontron, G. Kariniotakis, Assessment of alternative ways to integrate weather predictions in photovoltaic gen- eration forecasting, EGU General Assembly (2021). doi:10.5194/ EGUSPHERE-EGU21-16091

    2021

  81. [92]

    J. M. Bright, X. Sun, Statistical satellite-derived irradiance estimation: A case study in singapore, in: 2021 IEEE 48th Photovoltaic Spe- cialists Conference (PVSC), 2021, pp. 0835–0842. doi:10.1109/ PVSC43889.2021.9518398

    2021

  82. [93]

    Tournadre, B

    B. Tournadre, B. Gschwind, Y . Saint-Drenan, X. Chen, R. A. e Silva, P. Blanc, An alternative cloud index for estimating downwelling surface solar irradiance from various satellite imagers in the framework of a heliosat-v method, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (2022).doi: ...

    2022 doi

  83. [94]

    Gregor, B

    P. Gregor, B. Mayer, T. Zinner, J. Schreder, L. Bugliaro, Towards seam- less irradiance nowcasting on intrahour to intraday scales using all-sky and satellite imagery, Tech. rep., Copernicus Meetings (2021)

    2021

  84. [95]

    F. J. Rodr ´ıguez-Ben´ıtez, M. L ´opez-Cuesta, C. Arbizu-Barrena, M. M. Fern´andez-Le´on, M. ´A. Pamos-Ure ˜na, J. Tovar-Pescador, F. Santos- Alamillos, D. Pozo-V ´azquez, Assessment of new solar radiation now- casting methods based on sky-camera and satellite imagery, Applied...

    2021

  85. [96]

    Logothetis, V

    S.-A. Logothetis, V . Salamalikis, S. Wilbert, J. Remund, L. Zarzalejo, Y . Xie, B. Nouri, E. Ntavelis, J. Nou, L. Visser, M. Sengupta, M. P ´o, R. Chauvin, S. Grieu, W. van Sark, A. Kazantzidis, Forecasting of solar irradiance and ramp events with all-sky imagers (2021).doi:1...

    2021

  86. [97]

    Suheb, J. V . N, Iot enabled smart metering in smart energy grid, in: 2022 IEEE North Karnataka Subsection Flagship International Confer- ence (NKCon), 2022, pp. 1–8. doi:10.1109/NKCon56289.2022. 10126752

    2022

  87. [98]

    A. P. Kaur, M. Singh, Iot-based net meter for vehicle-to-grid application with time-of-use, in: 2023 Second International Conference On Smart Technologies For Smart Nation (SmartTechCon), 2023, pp. 153–158. doi:10.1109/SmartTechCon57526.2023.10391799

    2023

  88. [99]

    Al-Haddad, A

    Y . Al-Haddad, A. A. Ibrahim, R. Naeem, Forecasting energy consump- tion in smart grids: A comparative analysis of recurrent neural net- works, Iraqi Journal for Computers and Informatics (2024). doi: 10.25195/ijci.v50i1.492

    2024 doi

  89. [100]

    Mlynek, V

    P. Mlynek, V . Uher, J. Misurec, Forecasting of smart meters energy con- sumption for data analytics and grid monitoring, 2022 22nd International Scientific Conference on Electric Power Engineering (EPE) (2022) 1– 5doi:10.1109/EPE54603.2022.9814101

    2022

  90. [101]

    Z. Chen, A. Amani, X. Yu, M. Jalili, Control and optimisation of power grids using smart meter data: A review, Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 23 (2023). doi:10.3390/s23042118

    2023 doi

  91. [102]

    L. Yuan, C. Ying, S. Yongfu, Z. Xuenan, L. Yucai, L. Yang, Research on short-term load forecasting under demand response of multi-type power grid connection based on dynamic electricity price, in: 2021 IEEE In- ternational Conference on Power, Intelligent Computing and Systems...

    2021

  92. [103]

    Wang, Demand forecasting and resource scheduling of independent energy storage market in power grid with deep learning, Journal of Elec- trical Systems (2024)

    Z. Wang, Demand forecasting and resource scheduling of independent energy storage market in power grid with deep learning, Journal of Elec- trical Systems (2024). doi:10.52783/jes.2609

    2024 doi

  93. [104]

    Rawal, A

    K. Rawal, A. Ahmad, A comparative analysis of supervised machine learning algorithms for electricity demand forecasting, in: 2022 Second International Conference on Power, Control and Computing Technolo- gies (ICPC2T), 2022, pp. 1–6. doi:10.1109/ICPC2T53885.2022. 9776960

    2022

  94. [105]

    F. Cui, D. An, G. Zhang, A game strategy for demand response based on load monitoring in smart grid, Frontiers in Energy Research (2023). doi:10.3389/fenrg.2023.1240542

    2023

  95. [106]

    Shaqour, H

    A. Shaqour, H. Farzaneh, H. Almogdady, Day-ahead residential electric- ity demand response model based on deep neural networks for peak de- mand reduction in the jordanian power sector, Applied Sciences (2021). doi:10.3390/APP11146626

    2021 doi

  96. [107]

    Schmude, S

    J. Schmude, S. Roy, W. Trojak, J. Jakubik, D. S. Civitarese, S. Singh, J. Kuehnert, K. Ankur, A. Gupta, C. E. Phillips, et al., Prithvi wxc: Foun- dation model for weather and climate, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.13598 24 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  97. [108]

    Paletta, G

    Q. Paletta, G. Terr ´en-Serrano, Y . Nie, B. Li, J. Bieker, W. Zhang, L. Dubus, S. Dev, C. Feng, Advances in solar forecasting: Computer vision with deep learning, Advances in Applied Energy (2023) 100150

    2023

  98. [109]

    S. J. Lee, Multimodal data fusion for estimating electricity access and demand, Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2023)

    2023

  99. [110]

    Bharti, V

    S. Bharti, V . Saini, R. Kumar, A. Vijayvargiya, Attention mechanism in deep learning for wind power forecasting, in: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems (PEDES), 2022, pp. 1–6. doi:10.1109/PEDES56012.2022.10080136

    2022

  100. [111]

    A. Meng, S. Chen, Z. Ou, W. Ding, H. Zhou, J. Fan, H. Yin, A hy- brid deep learning architecture for wind power prediction based on bi- attention mechanism and crisscross optimization, Energy 238 (2022) 121795. doi:10.1016/J.ENERGY.2021.121795

    2022

  101. [112]

    Zhang, C

    Y . Zhang, C. Peng, A hybrid model based on deep learning and cross-attention for short-term wind power prediction, in: 2022 5th International Conference on Renewable Energy and Power Engineer- ing (REPE), 2022, pp. 351–355. doi:10.1109/REPE55559.2022. 9948810

    2022

  102. [113]

    F. Chen, Y . Zhang, J. Yan, J. You, Y . Liu, M. B. Paskyabi, Ultra-short- term wind power forecasting based on attention mechanism, in: The 10th Renewable Power Generation Conference (RPG 2021), V ol. 2021, 2021, pp. 186–192. doi:10.1049/icp.2021.2387

    2021

  103. [114]

    C. M. Sendanayake, M. A. Juman, T. W. Shan, T. C. Pin, Attention mechanisms in deep learning models for short-term energy load fore- casting, 2023 IEEE 21st Student Conference on Research and Devel- opment (SCOReD) (2023) 87–92doi:10.1109/SCOReD60679.2023. 10563696

    2023

  104. [115]

    Z. Wang, Z. Zhu, G. Xiao, B. Bai, Y . Zhang, A transformer-based multi- entity load forecasting method for integrated energy systems, Frontiers in Energy Research 10 (2022). doi:10.3389/fenrg.2022.952420

    2022

  105. [116]

    D. Cui, W. Xiang, Z. Zang, H. Yu, Z. Ou, Y . Mao, Z. He, Tem- poral fusion transformer with non-intrusive attention for data-driven electricity load forecasting, 2023 7th International Conference on Power and Energy Engineering (ICPEE) (2023) 275–281 doi:10. 1109/ICPEE60001.20...

    2023

  106. [117]

    V . G. Morelli, M. P. Barbato, F. Piccoli, P. Napoletano, Multimodal fu- sion methods with vision transformers for remote sensing semantic seg- mentation, in: 2023 13th Workshop on Hyperspectral Imaging and Sig- nal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS), 2023, pp....

    2023

  107. [118]

    D. Jia, J. Guo, K. Han, H. Wu, C. Zhang, C. Xu, X. Chen, Gemini- fusion: E fficient pixel-wise multimodal fusion for vision transformer, ArXiv abs/2406.01210 (2024). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2406.01210

    2024 doi arXiv

  108. [119]

    Pellegrain, M

    V . Pellegrain, M. Tami, M. Batteux, C. Hudelot, Streamult: Streaming multimodal transformer for heterogeneous and arbitrary long sequential data, ArXiv abs/2110.08021 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  109. [120]

    B. N. Palety, C. Mahalakshmi, Analysing the residential electricity consumption using smart meter, International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication (2022). doi: 10.17762/ijritcc.v10i2s.5910

    2022 doi

  110. [121]

    G. Rajendiran, Non-intrusive load monitoring: a promising path to the society for responsible energy utilization and sustainability, Proceedings of the Thirteenth ACM International Conference on Future Energy Sys- tems (2022). doi:10.1145/3538637.3539635

    2022

  111. [122]

    T. K. Avordeh, S. Gyamfi, A. Opoku, The role of demand response in residential electricity load reduction using appliance shifting techniques, International Journal of Energy Sector Management (2021). doi:10. 1108/ijesm-05-2020-0014

    2021

  112. [123]

    B. M. R. Vasuprada, D. A. Nasreen, Forecasting peak and appliance level demand using smart meter data, 2021

    2021

  113. [124]

    D. A. Bashawyah, S. Qaisar, Machine learning based short-term load forecasting for smart meter energy consumption data in london house- holds, in: 2021 IEEE 12th International Conference on Electronics and Information Technologies (ELIT), 2021, pp. 99–102. doi:10.1109/ ELIT535...

    2021

  114. [125]

    Liang, Y

    R. Liang, Y . Deng, D. Xie, F. He, D. Wang, Enabling time-series foun- dation model for building energy forecasting via contrastive curriculum learning, arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.17285 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  115. [126]

    H. F. Hamann, et al., A perspective on foundation models for the electric power grid, arXiv preprint (2024). arXiv:2407.09434. URL https://arxiv.org/html/2407.09434v1

    2024 arXiv

  116. [127]

    P. Phyo, Y . Byun, Hybrid ensemble deep learning-based approach for time series energy prediction, Symmetry 13 (2021) 1942. doi:10. 3390/sym13101942

    2021

  117. [128]

    S. M. Jalali, G. Os ´orio, S. Ahmadian, M. Lotfi, V . A. Campos, M. Shafie- khah, A. Khosravi, J. Catal ˜ao, New hybrid deep neural architectural search-based ensemble reinforcement learning strategy for wind power forecasting, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 58 (2022) 15–

    2022

  118. [129]

    J. A. Thaker, R. H ¨oller, M. Kapasi, Short-term solar irradiance predic- tion with a hybrid ensemble model using eumetsat satellite images, En- ergies (2024). doi:10.3390/en17020329

    2024 doi

  119. [130]

    doi:10.1109/TIA.2021.3126272

    2021

  120. [131]

    H. Liu, J. Gan, X. Fan, Y . Zhang, C. Luo, J. Zhang, G. Jiang, Y . Qian, C. Zhao, H. Ma, Z. Guo, Pt-tuning: Bridging the gap between time series masked reconstruction and forecasting via prompt token tuning, ArXiv abs/2311.03768 (2023). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2311.03768

    2023 doi arXiv

  121. [132]

    Usmani, Z

    M. Usmani, Z. Memon, K. U. Danyaro, R. Qureshi, Optimized multi- level multi-type ensemble (omme) forecasting model for univariate time series, IEEE Access 12 (2024) 35700–35715. doi:10.1109/ACCESS. 2024.3370679

    2024

  122. [133]

    H. Xue, F. D. Salim, Promptcast: A new prompt-based learning paradigm for time series forecasting, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2022). doi:10.1109/tkde.2023.3342137

    2022

  123. [134]

    F. Jia, K. Wang, Y . Zheng, D. Cao, Y . Liu, Gpt4mts: Prompt-based large language model for multimodal time-series forecasting (2024) 23343– 23351doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i21.30383

    2024 doi

  124. [135]

    Jawed, K

    S. Jawed, K. Madhusudhanan, V . K. Yalavarthi, L. Schmidt-Thieme, Forecasting early with meta learning, 2023 International Joint Con- ference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) (2023) 1–8 doi:10.1109/ IJCNN54540.2023.10191229

    2023

  125. [136]

    F. Xiao, L. Liu, J. Han, D. Guo, S. Wang, H. Cui, T. Peng, Meta-learning for few-shot time series forecasting, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 43 (2022) 325–

    2022

  126. [137]

    Germ´an-Morales, A

    M. Germ´an-Morales, A. J. Rivera-Rivas, M. J. del, J. D´ıaz, C. J. Car- mona, Transfer learning with foundational models for time series fore- casting using low-rank adaptations (2024)

    2024

  127. [138]

    Paischer, L

    F. Paischer, L. Hauzenberger, T. Schmied, B. Alkin, M. Deisenroth, S. Hochreiter, One initialization to rule them all: Fine-tuning via ex- plained variance adaptation (2024)

    2024

  128. [139]

    H. Shen, X. Shen, Y . Chen, Real-time microgrid energy scheduling using meta-reinforcement learning, Energies (2024). doi:10.3390/ en17102367

    2024

  129. [140]

    Khanna, M

    S. Khanna, M. Irgau, D. B. Lobell, S. Ermon, Explora: Parameter- efficient extended pre-training to adapt vision transformers under do- main shifts, ArXiv abs /2406.10973 (2024). doi:10.48550/arXiv. 2406.10973

    2024 doi

  130. [141]

    C. Meo, K. Sycheva, A. Goyal, J. Dauwels, Bayesian-lora: Lora based parameter e fficient fine-tuning using optimal quantization lev- els and rank values through di fferentiable bayesian gates, ArXiv abs/2406.13046 (2024). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2406.13046

    2024 doi arXiv

  131. [142]

    Gupta, A

    D. Gupta, A. Bhatti, S. Parmar, C. Dan, Y . Liu, B. Shen, S. Lee, Low- rank adaptation of time series foundational models for out-of-domain modality forecasting, ArXiv abs /2405.10216 (2024). doi:10.48550/ arXiv.2405.10216

    2024 doi arXiv

  132. [143]

    Arpino, H

    G. Arpino, H. Shih, W. Bruinsma, E. P. Martins, Gaussian processes for probabilistic electricity price forecasting (2021)

    2021

  133. [144]

    Y . Liu, M. Zhu, J. Bai, Y . Qin, Y . Zhang, Short-term probabilistic forecasting of renewable energy generation with direct multistep-ahead strategy and recurrent neural network, 2022 4th International Confer- ence on Power and Energy Technology (ICPET) (2022) 975–980 doi: 10...

    2022

  134. [145]

    Chaouch, Probabilistic wind speed forecasting for wind turbine allo- cation in the power grid, Energies (2023).doi:10.3390/en16227615

    M. Chaouch, Probabilistic wind speed forecasting for wind turbine allo- cation in the power grid, Energies (2023).doi:10.3390/en16227615

    2023 doi

  135. [146]

    C. Lyu, S. Eftekharnejad, Probabilistic solar generation forecasting for rapidly changing weather conditions, IEEE Access 12 (2024) 79091– 79103. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3407778

    2024

  136. [147]

    J. Ye, B. Zhao, D. Liu, Q. Wei, Y . Wang, Tadnet: Temporal atten- tion decomposition networks for probabilistic energy forecasting, IEEE 25 Transactions on Power Systems 39 (2024) 7190–7202. doi:10.1109/ TPWRS.2024.3380388

    2024

  137. [148]

    L. Li, R. Carver, I. Lopez-Gomez, F. Sha, J. Anderson, Generative em- ulation of weather forecast ensembles with di ffusion models, Science Advances 10 (2024). doi:10.1126/sciadv.adk4489

    2024 doi

  138. [149]

    B. Tang, D. S. Matteson, Probabilistic transformer for time series analy- sis (2021) 23592–23608

    2021

  139. [151]

    H. Liu, C. Liu, X. Jiang, X. Chen, S. Yang, X. Wang, Deep probabilis- tic time series forecasting using augmented recurrent input for dynamic systems, ArXiv abs/2106.05848 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  140. [152]

    Y . Sha, R. Sobash, D. J. Gagne, Improving ensemble extreme precipitation forecasts using generative artificial intelligence, ArXiv abs/2407.04882 (2024). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2407.04882

    2024 doi

  141. [153]

    Verc ¸osa, V

    L. Verc ¸osa, V . R. Borba, P. H. E. S. Lima, L. A. G. Malag´on, B. Giublin, J. F. L. Oliveira, An ensemble based hybrid system for residual forecast- ing in industrial data, Anais do 15. Congresso Brasileiro de Inteligˆencia Computacional (2021). doi:10.21528/cbic2021-31

    2021 doi

  142. [154]

    X. Wang, L. Tong, Q. Zhao, Generative probabilistic time series fore- casting and applications in grid operations, 2024 58th Annual Con- ference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS) (2024) 1–6 doi: 10.1109/CISS59072.2024.10480214

    2024

  143. [155]

    Jeworrek, G

    J. Jeworrek, G. West, R. Stull, Optimizing analog ensembles for sub- daily precipitation forecasts, Atmosphere (2022). doi:10.3390/ atmos13101662

    2022

  144. [156]

    Baran, Parametric model for post-processing visibility ensemble forecasts, Advances in Statistical Climatology, Meteorology and Oceanography (2023)

    ´Agnes Baran, S. Baran, Parametric model for post-processing visibility ensemble forecasts, Advances in Statistical Climatology, Meteorology and Oceanography (2023). doi:10.5194/ascmo-10-105-2024

    2023 doi

  145. [157]

    Skøien, K

    J. Skøien, K. Bogner, P. Salamon, F. Wetterhall, On the implementation of post-processing of runoff forecast ensembles, Journal of Hydromete- orology (2021). doi:10.1175/jhm-d-21-0008.1

    2021 doi

  146. [158]

    Li, Estimating uncertainty with implicit quantile network, ArXiv abs/2408.14525 (2024)

    Y .-H. Li, Estimating uncertainty with implicit quantile network, ArXiv abs/2408.14525 (2024). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2408.14525

    2024 doi arXiv

  147. [159]

    V . Z. Zheng, L. Sun, Mvg-crps: A robust loss function for multivariate probabilistic forecasting (2024)

    2024

  148. [160]

    L ´opez-Ruiz, C

    S. L ´opez-Ruiz, C. I. H. Castellanos, K. Rodr ´ıguez-V´azquez, Multi- objective framework for quantile forecasting in financial time series us- ing transformers, in: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Com- putation Conference, 2022. doi:10.1145/3512290.3528740

    2022

  149. [161]

    K. Wang, Y . Zhang, F. Lin, J. Wang, M. Zhu, Nonparametric probabilis- tic forecasting for wind power generation using quadratic spline quan- tile function and autoregressive recurrent neural network, IEEE Trans- actions on Sustainable Energy 13 (2022) 1930–1943. doi:10.1109/ ...

    2022

  150. [162]

    Borgohain, K

    S. Borgohain, K. Ackermann, R. Loaiza-Maya, Bayesian neural net- work versus ex-post calibration for prediction uncertainty, ArXiv abs/2209.14594 (2022). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2209.14594

    2022 doi arXiv

  151. [163]

    Koochali, E

    A. Koochali, E. Tahaei, A. Dengel, S. Ahmed, Vaeneu: A new avenue for vae application on probabilistic forecasting, ArXiv abs /2405.04252 (2024). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2405.04252

    2024 doi arXiv

  152. [164]

    W. Qian, D. Zhang, Y . Zhao, K. Zheng, J. J. Q. Yu, Uncertainty quantifi- cation for traffic forecasting: A unified approach, ArXiv abs/2208.05875 (2022). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2208.05875

    2022 doi arXiv

  153. [165]

    Hekler, T

    A. Hekler, T. Brinker, F. Buettner, Test time augmentation meets post- hoc calibration: Uncertainty quantification under real-world conditions, ArXiv abs/2303.02644 (2023). doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i12.26735

    2023 arXiv

  154. [166]

    Bic ¸ici, H

    E. Bic ¸ici, H. Saribas, Calibrating neural networks for ctr prediction, 2023 31st Signal Processing and Communications Applications Con- ference (SIU) (2023) 1–4doi:10.1109/SIU59756.2023.10223867

    2023

  155. [167]

    E. H. Capel, J. Dumas, Denoising di ffusion probabilistic models for probabilistic energy forecasting, ArXiv abs /2212.02977 (2022). doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2212.02977

    2022 doi arXiv

  156. [168]

    J. D. Lara, O. Dowson, K. Doubleday, B. Hodge, D. S. Callaway, A multi-stage stochastic risk assessment with markovian representation of renewable power, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 13 (2022) 414–426. doi:10.1109/tste.2021.3114615

    2022

  157. [169]

    Y .-H. Lin, G. Li, A bayesian deep learning framework for rul pre- diction incorporating uncertainty quantification and calibration, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 18 (2022) 7274–7284. doi: 10.1109/TII.2022.3156965

    2022

  158. [170]

    Z. Ye, Y . He, F. Luo, Evaluation study of deep learning-based mod- els on probabilistic power load forecasting, 2023 IEEE 7th Conference on Energy Internet and Energy System Integration (EI2) (2023) 4312– 4317doi:10.1109/EI259745.2023.10512431

    2023

  159. [171]

    C. Wang, Y . Wang, Z. Ding, K. Zhang, Probabilistic multi-energy load forecasting for integrated energy system based on bayesian transformer network, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 15 (2024) 1495–1508. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2023.3296647

    2024

  160. [172]

    M. Draz, F. Pagel, S. Albayrak, Probabilistic risk assessment in power systems with high wind energy penetration, IEEE Access 12 (2024) 140097–140111. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3463882

    2024

  161. [173]

    Kim, Quantization robust pruning with knowledge distillation, IEEE Access 11 (2023) 26419–26426

    J. Kim, Quantization robust pruning with knowledge distillation, IEEE Access 11 (2023) 26419–26426. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2023. 3257864

    2023 doi

  162. [174]

    K. Feng, L. Xu, D. Zhao, S. Liu, X. Huang, Toward model compres- sion for a deep learning–based solar flare forecast on satellites, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 268 (2023). doi:10.3847/ 1538-4365/ace96a

    2023

  163. [175]

    Huang, W

    T. Huang, W. Dong, F. Wu, X. Li, G. Shi, Uncertainty-driven knowl- edge distillation for language model compression, IEEE/ACM Transac- tions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 31 (2023) 2850–2858. doi:10.1109/TASLP.2023.3289303

    2023

  164. [176]

    X. Zhu, J. Li, Y . Liu, C. Ma, W. Wang, A survey on model compres- sion for large language models, ArXiv abs /2308.07633 (2023). doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2308.07633

    2023 doi arXiv

  165. [177]

    W. Li, X. Meng, C. Chen, H. Mi, H. Wang, Bidformer: A transformer- based model via bidirectional sparse self-attention mechanism for long sequence time-series forecasting, in: 2023 IEEE International Confer- ence on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), 2023, pp. 4076–4082. doi...

    2023

  166. [178]

    M. Mnif, S. Sahnoun, M. Djemaa, A. Fakhfakh, O. Kanoun, Exploring model compression techniques for e fficient 1d cnn-based hand gesture recognition on resource-constrained edge devices, 2024 IEEE 7th In- ternational Conference on Advanced Technologies, Signal and Image Process...

    2024

  167. [180]

    L. Wen, Q. Hu, C. Guo, A. Hu, M. Zhang, Cross-scale attention for long- term time series forecasting, IEEE Signal Processing Letters 31 (2024) 2675–2679. doi:10.1109/LSP.2024.3439103

    2024

  168. [181]

    G. Chen, H. Wang, Y . Liu, M. Zhang, F. Zhang, Resformer: Com- bine quadratic linear transformation with efficient sparse transformer for long-term series forecasting, Intelligent Data Analysis (2023). doi: 10.3233/ida-227006

    2023 doi

  169. [182]

    H. Peng, K. Wu, Y . Wei, G. Zhao, Y . Yang, Z. Liu, Y . Xiong, Z. Yang, B. Ni, J. Hu, R. Li, M. Zhang, C. Li, J. Ning, R. Wang, Z. Zhang, S. Liu, J. Chau, H. Hu, P. Cheng, Fp8-lm: Training fp8 large language models, ArXiv abs/2310.18313 (2023). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2310.18313

    2023 doi arXiv

  170. [183]

    R. Liu, C. Wei, Y . Yang, W. Wang, B. Yuan, H. Yang, Y . Liu, A dynamic execution neural network processor for fine-grained mixed- precision model training based on online quantization sensitivity anal- ysis, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 59 (2024) 3082–3093. doi: 10.11...

    2024

  171. [184]

    R. Ding, Y . Chen, Y .-T. Lan, W. Zhang, Drformer: Multi-scale trans- former utilizing diverse receptive fields for long time-series forecasting, ArXiv abs/2408.02279 (2024). doi:10.1145/3627673.3679724

    2024 arXiv

  172. [185]

    Z. Xie, S. Raskar, M. Emani, Throughput-oriented and accuracy-aware dnn training with bfloat16 on gpu, 2022 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops (IPDPSW) (2022) 1084– 1087doi:10.1109/IPDPSW55747.2022.00176

    2022

  173. [186]

    M. Jain, S. Ghosh, S. Nandanoori, Workload characterization of a time- series prediction system for spatio-temporal data, Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers (2022). doi:10.1145/3528416.3530242

    2022

  174. [187]

    Santos, P

    F. Santos, P. Rech, A. Kritikakou, O. Sentieys, Evaluating the impact of mixed-precision on fault propagation for deep neural networks on gpus, 2022 IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on VLSI (ISVLSI) (2022) 327–327doi:10.1109/ISVLSI54635.2022.00071

    2022

  175. [188]

    F. A. Nahid, W. Ongsakul, N. M. M., T. Laopaiboon, Hybrid neural networks for renewable energy forecasting, Advances in Computer and Electrical Engineering (2021). doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-3970-5. ch011

    2021 doi

  176. [189]

    Nadeem, M

    A. Nadeem, M. F. Hanif, M. S. Naveed, M. T. Hassan, M. Gul, N. Hus- nain, J. Mi, Ai-driven precision in solar forecasting: Breakthroughs in machine learning and deep learning, AIMS Geosciences (2024). doi:10.3934/geosci.2024035

    2024 doi

  177. [190]

    Lermer, C

    M. Lermer, C. Reich, D. Abdeslam, Hybrid ai improves energy fore- 26 casts by combining fuzzy rules, evolutionary strategies and neural net- works, in: IECON 2021 – 47th Annual Conference of the IEEE Indus- trial Electronics Society, 2021, pp. 1–6. doi:10.1109/IECON48115. 2021.9589186

    2021

  178. [191]

    Watermeyer, T

    M. Watermeyer, T. Mobius, O. Grothe, F. Musgens, A hybrid model for day-ahead electricity price forecasting: Combining fundamental and stochastic modelling (2023)

    2023

  179. [192]

    P. Niu, T. Zhou, X. Wang, L. Sun, R. Jin, Attention as robust rep- resentation for time series forecasting, ArXiv abs /2402.05370 (2024). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2402.05370

    2024 doi arXiv

  180. [193]

    Y . Zhou, C. MacPhee, T. Zhou, B. Jalali, Nonlinear schr¨odinger network, ArXiv abs/2407.14504 (2024). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2407.14504

    2024 doi arXiv

  181. [194]

    Aguilera-Martos, A

    I. Aguilera-Martos, A. Herrera-Poyatos, J. Luengo, F. Herrera, Local attention: Enhancing the transformer architecture for efficient time series forecasting, 2024 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) (2024) 1–8doi:10.1109/IJCNN60899.2024.10650762

    2024

  182. [195]

    Q. Li, J. Qin, D. Sun, F. Shi, D. Cui, J. Xie, Linwa: Linear weights attention for time series forecasting, 2024 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) (2024) 1–8doi:10.1109/IJCNN60899. 2024.10650033

    2024

  183. [196]

    Wu, Revisiting attention for multivariate time series forecasting, ArXiv abs/2407.13806 (2024)

    H. Wu, Revisiting attention for multivariate time series forecasting, ArXiv abs/2407.13806 (2024). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2407.13806

    2024 doi arXiv

  184. [197]

    Cremades, S

    A. Cremades, S. Hoyas, R. Vinuesa, Additive-feature-attribution meth- ods: a review on explainable artificial intelligence for fluid dynamics and heat transfer, ArXiv abs /2409.11992 (2024). doi:10.48550/arXiv. 2409.11992

    2024 doi arXiv

  185. [198]

    Ioannou, A

    G. Ioannou, A. Stafylopatis, The issue of baselines in explainability methods, 2023 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Work- shops (ICDMW) (2023) 958–965 doi:10.1109/ICDMW60847.2023. 00127

    2023

  186. [199]

    Baric, P

    D. Baric, P. Fumi ´c, D. Horvatic, T. Lipi´c, Benchmarking attention-based interpretability of deep learning in multivariate time series predictions, Entropy 23 (2021). doi:10.3390/e23020143

    2021 doi

  187. [200]

    Huang, J

    X. Huang, J. Marques-Silva, Updates on the complexity of shap scores, ArXiv abs/2405.11766 (2024). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2405.11766

    2024 doi arXiv

  188. [201]

    Y . Zhuo, Z. Ge, Ig2: Integrated gradient on iterative gradient path for feature attribution, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Ma- chine Intelligence 46 (2024) 7173–7190. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2024. 3388092

    2024 doi

  189. [202]

    Raykar, A

    V . Raykar, A. Jati, S. Mukherjee, N. Aggarwal, K. K. Sarpatwar, G. Ganapavarapu, R. Vacul´ın, Tsshap: Robust model agnostic feature- based explainability for time series forecasting, ArXiv abs /2303.12316 (2023). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2303.12316

    2023 doi arXiv

  190. [203]

    Kleinlein, A

    R. Kleinlein, A. Hepburn, R. Santos-Rodr ´ıguez, F. Fern´andez-Mart´ınez, Sampling based on natural image statistics improves local surrogate ex- plainers (2022) 1083doi:10.48550/arXiv.2208.03961

    2022 doi arXiv

  191. [204]

    Sigut, F

    J. Sigut, F. Fumero, R. Arnay, J. Est ´evez, T. D´ıaz-Alem´an, Interpretable surrogate models to approximate the predictions of convolutional neural networks in glaucoma diagnosis, Machine Learning: Science and Tech- nology 4 (2023). doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ad0798

    2023 doi

  192. [205]

    Heidari, P

    F. Heidari, P. Taslakian, G. Rabusseau, Explaining graph neural net- works using interpretable local surrogates (2023) 146–155

    2023

  193. [206]

    Ozyegen, I

    O. Ozyegen, I. Ilic, M. Cevik, Evaluation of interpretability methods for multivariate time series forecasting, Applied Intelligence (2021) 1– 17doi:10.1007/s10489-021-02662-2

    2021 doi

  194. [207]

    Kuvshinova, O

    K. Kuvshinova, O. Tsymboi, A. Kostromina, D. Simakov, E. Kovtun, Towards foundation time series model: To synthesize or not to synthe- size?, ArXiv abs /2403.02534 (2024). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2403. 02534

    2024 doi arXiv

  195. [208]

    Ranjbar, R

    N. Ranjbar, R. Safabakhsh, Using decision tree as local interpretable model in autoencoder-based lime, 2022 27th International Computer Conference, Computer Society of Iran (CSICC) (2022) 1–7 doi:10. 48550/arXiv.2204.03321

    2022 doi arXiv

  196. [209]

    van Sprang, E

    A. van Sprang, E. Acar, W. Zuidema, Enforcing interpretability in time series transformers: A concept bottleneck framework (2024)

    2024

  197. [210]

    H. H. Kjaernli, L. Mas-Ribas, A. Ashrafi, G. Sizov, H. Langseth, O. E. Gundersen, Probing the robustness of time-series forecasting models with counterfacts, ArXiv abs /2403.03508 (2024). doi:10.48550/ arXiv.2403.03508

    2024 doi arXiv

  198. [211]

    Potosnak, C

    W. Potosnak, C. Challu, M. Goswami, M. Wili ´nski, N. Zukowska, Im- plicit reasoning in deep time series forecasting, ArXiv abs /2409.10840 (2024). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2409.10840

    2024 doi arXiv

  199. [212]

    X. Gou, L. Hu, D. Wang, X. Zhang, A fundamental model with stable interpretability for tra ffic forecasting, in: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Geo-Privacy and Data Utility for Smart Societies, 2023. doi:10.1145/3615889.3628510

    2023

  200. [213]

    Harel, U

    N. Harel, U. Obolski, R. Gilad-Bachrach, Inherent inconsistencies of feature importance (2022)

    2022

  201. [214]

    G. Airlangga, Decoding energy usage predictions: An application of xai techniques for enhanced model interpretability, Indonesian Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Data Mining (2024). doi:10.24014/ ijaidm.v7i2.29041

    2024

  202. [215]

    Kaneko, Interpretation of machine learning models for data sets with many features using feature importance, ACS Omega 8 (2023) 23218– 23225

    H. Kaneko, Interpretation of machine learning models for data sets with many features using feature importance, ACS Omega 8 (2023) 23218– 23225. doi:10.1021/acsomega.3c03722

    2023 doi

  203. [216]

    Zheng, J

    Q. Zheng, J. Zheng, F. Mei, A. Gao, X. Zhang, Y . Xie, Tcn-gat mul- tivariate load forecasting model based on shap value selection strategy in integrated energy system, Frontiers in Energy Research 11 (2023). doi:10.3389/fenrg.2023.1208502

    2023

  204. [217]

    Samimi, A

    R. Samimi, A. Alyousef, D. Baranzini, H. Meer, Boosting interpretabil- ity of non-readable deep learning forecasts: the case of buildings’ energy consumptions prediction, in: Proceedings of the Thirteenth ACM Inter- national Conference on Future Energy Systems, 2022. doi:10.11...

    2022

  205. [218]

    Toubeau, J

    J. Toubeau, J. Bottieau, Y . Wang, F. Vall ´ee, Interpretable probabilistic forecasting of imbalances in renewable-dominated electricity systems, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 13 (2022) 1267–1277. doi: 10.1109/tste.2021.3092137. 27

    2022

  206. [220]

    Zeng, Enhancing the interpretability of shap values using large lan- guage models, ArXiv abs/2409.00079 (2024)

    X. Zeng, Enhancing the interpretability of shap values using large lan- guage models, ArXiv abs/2409.00079 (2024). doi:10.48550/arXiv. 2409.00079

    2024 doi

  207. [341]

    doi:10.3233/jifs-212228

    doi

  208. [2947]

    doi:10.1109/TSG.2022.3224559

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.