Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 126 references

McKean-Vlasov equations with singular coefficients - a review of recent results

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A unified blueprint solves singular McKean-Vlasov equations with distributional drift.

desk verdict A useful, well-organized survey of singular McKean-Vlasov equations, with a clear roadmap for the distributional-drift case, but the uniqueness proof of the central theorem hinges on an unverified claim about marginals solving the non-linear Fokker-Planck equation. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.23553 v1 pith:TVKYX2WV submitted 2025-07-31 math.PR

Luca Bondi (UNITO , OC , ENSTA) , Elena Issoglio (UNITO) , Francesco Russo (ENSTA Paris , OC) This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PR MSC 60H1060H3060H5035K5535K67
keywords McKean-VlasovSDEsdistributionaldriftBesovspacesmartingaleproblemFokker-PlanckequationsregularisationbynoiseZvonkintransformationporousmediaequation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

McKean-Vlasov equations are stochastic differential equations whose coefficients depend on the law, or the law density, of the unknown process. This review surveys what happens when those coefficients become singular: either merely measurable with Lp-Lq integrability, or genuinely distributional, living in negative Besov-Hölder spaces. For distributional drift of the form $F(v)B$, where $B$ is a generalised function and $F$ a smooth nonlinearity, the paper argues that a unified methodology yields existence and uniqueness in law: define the singular SDE through a rough martingale problem, solve the singular Kolmogorov PDE and the non-linear Fokker-Planck PDE, and join them with a superposition principle. The survey also organises the broader literature by singularity type and by the nature of the law dependence. A sympathetic reader would take the contribution to be a trustworthy map of the field and a reusable proof strategy for singular mean-field equations.

What carries the argument

The central object is the rough martingale problem: a martingale problem whose test-function domain $D$ is generated by solutions of the singular Kolmogorov PDE $Lf = g$, with $L = \partial_t + \tfrac12\Delta f + \nabla f\cdot b$ and $b$ a distribution on the order of $C_T C^{-\beta+}$, $\beta\in(0,\tfrac12)$. Choosing $D$ so that $Lf$ is a genuine function lets one write $\int_0^t (Lf)(s,Z_s)\,ds$ without evaluating the distribution $b$ at the point $Z_s$. The supporting mechanism is the four-step roadmap connecting the Kolmogorov PDE to the rough martingale problem, then to the non-linear Fokker-Planck PDE, and finally to the McKean rough martingale problem; auxiliary tools are the Zvonkin transformation, Markov marginal uniqueness, and the stochastic sewing lemma.

What would settle it

A concrete test is the mollification step in the proof of Theorem 5.22: if for some sequence $B_n \to B$ in $C_T C^{-\beta}$ with $\beta\in(0,\tfrac12)$ and smooth $F$ satisfying the paper's assumptions, the solutions $v_n$ of the regularised Fokker-Planck equations fail to converge in $C_T C^\alpha$ for some $\alpha>\beta$, then Lemma 5.20(ii) is false and the superposition argument collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that singular McKean-Vlasov SDEs with distributional drift are not merely formal objects: they have a rigorous meaning and a well-posedness theory, and the recent results fit into one common architecture. The stated goal of Section 5 is to provide a comprehensive and detailed methodology for defining and solving McKean SDEs with Schwartz distributional coefficients, unifying the works [78, 79, 80, 76]. The architecture has four load-bearing steps: solve a singular backward Kolmogorov PDE whose drift lies in a negative Besov-Hölder space, which supplies a regular domain of test functions; define the solution of the non-McKean singular SDE as a rough martingale problem, so the distributional drift is never evaluated at points; solve the non-linear Fokker-Planck PDE, whose solution serves as the candidate marginal density; and combine the two through the Figalli-Trevisan superposition principle plus mollification and continuity arguments, obtaining existence and uniqueness for the McKean-Vlasov equation. The same blueprint, with isotropic Besov spaces replaced by anisotropic ones, is claimed to work for degenerate kinetic equations where noise acts only on some components.

Load-bearing premise

The roadmap's reliability rests on the fidelity of the survey's summaries of previously published theorems about rough martingale problems and non-linear Fokker-Planck equations, since the review itself does not re-prove those results.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the roadmap is correct, well-posedness for singular McKean-Vlasov equations with drift $F(v)B$ reduces to checking well-posedness of two PDEs: the singular Kolmogorov equation and the non-linear Fokker-Planck equation.
  • The rough-martingale-problem notion agrees with the classical martingale problem whenever the drift is regular enough, so the new solution concept collapses to the established one in the smooth limit.
  • The same architecture, with anisotropic Besov spaces, gives well-posedness for degenerate kinetic McKean-Vlasov equations where the noise is absent in some directions and smoothing must be propagated by hypoellipticity.
  • The survey's classification by singularity type and law dependence gives practitioners a checklist for choosing between density-based and Wasserstein-based techniques, and between function-type and distribution-type coefficients.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One can test the blueprint's scope by pushing it beyond the Young regime $\beta < \tfrac12$; the paper mentions paracontrolled and regularity-structure approaches for rougher drifts but does not integrate them into the unified scheme, leaving open whether the same four-step architecture survives there.
  • The roadmap suggests a concrete numerical recipe: mollify $B$, simulate the regularised particle system or SDE, and use the continuity statements of Theorem 5.14 and Lemma 5.20 to assert convergence to the singular McKean solution; the review itself does not run such simulations.
  • If the same method were applied to non-conservative Fokker-Planck equations, the linking-equation framework of Section 2.3 could replace the density-identification step, potentially extending the blueprint to McKean-Feynman-Kac equations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper is a review of McKean-Vlasov SDEs with singular coefficients. It first recalls classical well-posedness results for Wasserstein-type and density-dependent coefficients, then surveys, in Section 4, recent results under L^p-L^q and other integrability conditions on the coefficients. Section 5 focuses on distributional drifts and presents a unified roadmap, based on the authors' papers [76,78,79,80], that connects the singular Kolmogorov PDE, the rough martingale problem, and the non-linear Fokker-Planck PDE. The paper also collects the main tools (Figalli-Trevisan superposition principle, Zvonkin transformation, Markov marginal uniqueness, stochastic sewing lemma) and applies the roadmap to establish well-posedness for density-dependent McKean equations with distributional coefficients, as summarized in Theorem 5.22.

Significance. The review is useful: it gives a structured taxonomy of singular McKean-Vlasov equations, collects the key analytic and probabilistic tools with precise statements, and offers a substantial, mostly accurate map of the recent literature. Its main contribution is the detailed presentation in Section 5 of the authors' own framework for distributional drifts, which is a valuable entry point for readers. However, the advertised roadmap is not self-contained: the uniqueness step of Theorem 5.22 depends on an implication (solution of the rough martingale problem implies that its marginals solve the non-linear Fokker-Planck PDE) that is asserted but not proved or precisely referenced. Since this is the load-bearing step that closes the loop between the rough martingale problem and the Fokker-Planck equation, the central claim as written is not fully supported.

major comments (2)
  1. [§5.7, uniqueness paragraph after Theorem 5.22] The uniqueness part of Theorem 5.22 rests on the assertion that, given a solution P of the McKean rough martingale problem, its marginals v(t,·) satisfy the non-linear Fokker-Planck equation (5.28). This implication is not a formal consequence of Definition 5.21 alone: the rough martingale problem only constrains expectations of f(Z_t) for f in the domain D of Definition 5.10, where Lf = g ∈ C_T S and f_T ∈ S. To obtain the weak Fokker-Planck identity (5.29) for every Schwartz test function, one must solve the singular backward Kolmogorov equation (5.14) with terminal data at each intermediate time, use the martingale property for the resulting f, and then identify the resulting identity with the mild formulation (5.30). The review states no proposition, lemma, or exact location in [78] where this step is proved; the sentence 'the idea is to show...' is insufficient for the 'comprehensive and detailed methodology' promised in Section 5. Please provide a precise statement with a proof sketch or an exact reference, and replace the informal label 'somehow equivalent' in Section 5.7 and Figure 1.
  2. [§5.8, degenerate McKean-Vlasov equations] The paragraph at the end of Section 5.8 states that well-posedness for the degenerate equation (5.32) 'follows by similar arguments to those of the proof of Theorem 5.22'. Because the proof of Theorem 5.22 is incomplete at exactly the marginal-to-Fokker-Planck step identified above, the degenerate analogue inherits the same gap. The authors should either supply the missing argument in the non-degenerate case or point to the precise theorem and proof in [76] from which the degenerate uniqueness is derived.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.2, case 3, porous media equation] The sentence 'This point seems to be missing, but this gap is certainly filled in Chapter 6. of [71]' is vague; please specify which linearized Fokker-Planck uniqueness is meant and where exactly in [71] it is established.
  2. [§5.6, Lemma 5.20(i)] The right-hand side contains the expression '}B1}_} B2}' which appears to be a typo for '}B1}+}B2}' or a similar norm sum.
  3. [§5.4 and §5.7, Step 3 of the proof of Theorem 5.22] The use of the Figalli-Trevisan superposition principle for regularized drifts b^n should explicitly mention that, for smooth b^n, the rough martingale problem of Definition 5.10 is equivalent to the classical Stroock-Varadhan martingale problem (e.g., Lemma 4.1 in [80]); otherwise the identifications in Step 3 are implicit.
  4. [§5.1, equation (5.4) and (5.5)] The notation E^α_{ρ,M} for the ρ-ball conflicts with the use of ρ as the exponential weight in the equivalent norm (5.4); consider renaming one of the two parameters to avoid confusion.
  5. [§5.8, Figure 2] The caption 'Anisotropic anuli' is uninformative and contains a spelling error ('annuli'); at minimum, explain what the figure depicts.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular reduction found: Section 5 reviews the authors' own published results, but the central claims are quoted theorems rather than conclusions derived from their own premises.

full rationale

This paper is a review, not an original derivation, and it contains no fitted parameters renamed as predictions. Section 5 presents a roadmap built on the authors' own papers [78,79,80,76], quoting Theorem 5.11 from [80], Theorem 5.19 from [78], and Theorem 5.22 from [78]; this is a self-citation pattern, but the review also surveys competing frameworks (e.g., [36,35,69,122,123]) and does not invoke a self-cited uniqueness theorem to exclude alternatives. The only substantive concern is the uniqueness step of Theorem 5.22, where the review states that 'given a solution P, its marginals v(t,·) fulfill the non-linear Fokker-Planck equation' without giving the proof, and Section 5.6 explicitly notes that 'the test functions here are taken in the Schwartz space S(R^d) which are far from the domain D of the martingale problem.' That is an omitted proof or summarized implication, not a circular reduction: Definition 5.21 does not define a solution as one whose marginals solve the Fokker-Planck equation, so the implication is an additional theorem to be supplied from [78], not an equation that equals its input by construction. No step in the paper exhibits the specific reduction required by the circularity standard, so the score is 1, reflecting minor self-citation without load-bearing circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities appear; the review synthesizes published results. The main axioms are the standard probabilistic and analytic tools plus the cited well-posedness theorems that the survey does not re-prove.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Itô calculus, including Itô's formula and the equivalence of weak SDE solutions and martingale problems.
    Used throughout Sections 2 and 5.3 to derive Fokker-Planck equations and to define solution concepts.
  • standard math Figalli-Trevisan superposition principle, Theorem 3.2, attributed to [24].
    The key external theorem that constructs a process from a distributional solution of a Fokker-Planck PDE, used in Sections 3.2, 4.3 and 5.7.
  • standard math Schauder estimates and Bernstein inequalities for the heat semigroup on Besov-Hölder spaces.
    Stated as Lemma 5.4 and inequality (5.10) in Section 5.1; they are used to prove contraction for the singular Kolmogorov PDE in Section 5.2.
  • domain assumption Well-posedness of the singular Kolmogorov PDE for b in C_T C^{-beta+} with beta in (0,1/2), Theorem 5.9, from [79].
    This defines the domain of the rough martingale problem and is assumed, not proved, in the review.
  • domain assumption Hypoellipticity and block-form condition on the linear drift B1 in the degenerate kinetic case, from [76].
    Needed to obtain anisotropic Schauder estimates and well-posedness for degenerate McKean-Vlasov equations in Section 5.8.
  • standard math Krylov-Röckner Lp-Lq estimates for coefficients satisfying d/p + 2/q < 1.
    Basis for all strong well-posedness results reviewed in Section 4.1.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of McKean-Vlasov equations with singular coefficients - a review of recent results." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TVKYX2WV

@misc{pith2026250723553,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: McKean-Vlasov equations with singular coefficients - a review of recent results},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TVKYX2WV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.23553}
}
read the original abstract

This paper focuses on recent works on McKean-Vlasov stochastic differential equations (SDEs) involving singular coefficients. After recalling the classical framework, we review existing recent literature depending on the type of singularities of the coefficients: on the one hand they satisfy some integrability and measurability conditions only, while on the other hand the drift is allowed to be a generalised function. Different types of dependencies on the law of the unknown and different noises will also be considered. McKean-Vlasov SDEs are closely related to non-linear Fokker-Planck equations that are satisfied by the law (or its density) of the unknown. These connections are often established also in this singular setting and will be reviewed here. Important tools for dealing with singular coefficients are also included in the paper, such as Figalli-Trevisan superposition principle, Zvonkin transformation, Markov marginal uniqueness, and stochastic sewing lemma.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.23553 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Different connections about subsections. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Anisotropic anuli are denoted by C γ B and are called anisotropic Besov-H¨older spaces. The construction follows the Definition 5.2, which is the one of standard Besov spaces, provided that anisotropic anuli are used to define the dyadic partition of unity tφj u, see also [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

126 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [78]

    Issoglio and F

    E. Issoglio and F. Russo. McKean SDEs with singular coefficients. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e. Probabilit´ es et Statistiques., 59(3):1530–1548, 2023

    work page 2023

  2. [76]

    Issoglio, S

    E. Issoglio, S. Pagliarani, F. Russo, and D. Trevisani. Degenerate McKean-Vlasov equations with drift in anisotropic negative Besov spaces. Preprint Arxiv 2401.09165 , 2024. 51

    arXiv 2024

  3. [1]

    Alfonsi and V

    A. Alfonsi and V. Bally. Construction of Boltzmann and McKean-Vlasov type flows (the sewing lemma approach). Ann. Appl. Probab., 33(5):3351–3386, 2023

    2023

  4. [2]

    Ambrosio

    L. Ambrosio. Transport equation and Cauchy problem for BV vector fields and applications. Journ´ ees´Equations aux d´ eriv´ ees partielles, pages 1–11, 6 2004

    2004

  5. [3]

    Anzeletti, A

    L. Anzeletti, A. Richard, and E. Tanr´ e. Regularisation by fractional noise for one-dimensional differential equations with distributional drift. Electron. J. Probab., 28:49, 2023. Id/No 135

    2023

  6. [4]

    Athreya, O

    S. Athreya, O. Butkovsky, and L. Mytnik. Strong existence and uniqueness for stable stochas- tic differential equations with distributional drift. Ann. Probab., 48(1):178–210, 2020

    2020

  7. [5]

    Bahouri, J.-Y

    H. Bahouri, J.-Y. Chemin, and R. Danchin. Fourier analysis and nonlinear partial differential equations, volume 343. Springer, 2011

    2011

  8. [6]

    P. Bak. How nature works. The science of self-organized criticality . Berlin: Springer, 1996

    1996

Show all 126 references
  1. [7]

    Bandini and F

    E. Bandini and F. Russo. Weak Dirichlet processes and generalized martingale problems. Stochastic Process. Appl., 170(104261), 2024

    2024

  2. [8]

    B´ antay and I

    P. B´ antay and I. M. J´ anosi. Avalanche dynamics from anomalous diffusion.Physical review letters, 68(13):2058, 1992

    1992

  3. [9]

    Barbu, M

    V. Barbu, M. Rehmeier, and M. R¨ ockner. p-Brownian motion and the p-Laplacian. Preprint Arxiv 2409.18744, 2024 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Barbu and M

    V. Barbu and M. R¨ ockner. Probabilistic representation for solutions to nonlinear Fokker- Planck equations. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 50(4):4246–4260, 2018

    2018

  5. [11]

    Barbu and M

    V. Barbu and M. R¨ ockner. From nonlinear Fokker-Planck equations to solutions of distribu- tion dependent SDE. Ann. Probab., 48(4):1902–1920, 2020

    1902

  6. [12]

    Barbu and M

    V. Barbu and M. R¨ ockner. Uniqueness for nonlinear Fokker-Planck equations and for McKean- Vlasov SDEs: the degenerate case. J. Funct. Anal. , 285(4):37, 2023. Id/No 109980. 47

    2023

  7. [13]

    Barbu, M

    V. Barbu, M. R¨ ockner, and F. Russo. Probabilistic representation for solutions of an irregular porous media type equation: the irregular degenerate case. Probab. Theory Related Fields , 151(1-2):1–43, 2011

    2011

  8. [14]

    G. I. Barenblatt. On some unsteady motions of a liquid and gas in a porous medium. Akad. Nauk SSSR. Prikl. Mat. Meh. , 16:67–78, 1952

    1952

  9. [15]

    R. F. Bass and Z.-Q. Chen. Brownian motion with singular drift. Ann. Probab., 31(2):791–817, 2003

    2003

  10. [16]

    Belaribi, F

    N. Belaribi, F. Cuvelier, and F. Russo. A probabilistic algorithm approximating solutions of a singular PDE of porous media type. Monte Carlo Methods Appl. , 17(4):317–369, 2011

    2011

  11. [17]

    Belaribi, F

    N. Belaribi, F. Cuvelier, and F. Russo. Probabilistic and deterministic algorithms for space multidimensional irregular porous media equation.Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ., Anal. Comput., 1(1):3–62, 2013

    2013

  12. [18]

    Belaribi and F

    N. Belaribi and F. Russo. Uniqueness for Fokker-Planck equations with measurable coef- ficients and applications to the fast diffusion equation. Electron. J. Probab. , 17:no. 84, 28, 2012

    2012

  13. [19]

    Benachour, P

    S. Benachour, P. Chassaing, B. Roynette, and P. Vallois. Processus associ´ es ` a l’´ equation des milieux poreux. Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. (4) , 23(4):793–832, 1996

    1996

  14. [20]

    Benilan, H

    Ph. Benilan, H. Br´ ezis, and M. G. Crandall. A semilinear equation in L1pRNq. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa, Cl. Sci., IV. Ser. , 2:523–555, 1975

    1975

  15. [21]

    Benilan and M

    Ph. Benilan and M. G. Crandall. The continuous dependence on ϕ of solutions of put´ ∆pϕqpuqq“ 0. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 30:161–177, 1981

    1981

  16. [22]

    Blanchard, M

    P. Blanchard, M. R¨ ockner, and F. Russo. Probabilistic representation for solutions of an irregular porous media type equation. Ann. Probab., 38(5):1870–1900, 2010

    1900

  17. [23]

    Bogachev, T.I

    V.I. Bogachev, T.I. Krasovitskii, M. R¨ ockner, F. Russo, and S.V. Shaposhnikov. The super- position principle to Fokker-Planck Kolmogorov equation with potential terms. To appear: Pure and Applied Functional Analysis , 2025

    2025

  18. [24]

    Bogachev, M

    V.I. Bogachev, M. R¨ ockner, and S. V. Shaposhnikov. On the Ambrosio-Figalli-Trevisan superposition principle for probability solutions to Fokker-Planck-Kolmogorov equations. J. Dyn. Differ. Equations , 33(2):715–739, 2021

    2021

  19. [25]

    J.-M. Bony. Calcul symbolique et propagation des singularites pour les ´ equations aux d´ eriv´ ees partielles non lin´ eaires.Ann. Sci. Ec. Norm. Super. , 14:209–246, 1981

    1981

  20. [26]

    Bossy, J.-F

    M. Bossy, J.-F. Jabir, and D. Talay. On conditional McKean Lagrangian stochastic models. Probability theory and related fields , 151:319–351, 2011

    2011

  21. [27]

    Butkovsky, K

    O. Butkovsky, K. Dareiotis, and M. Gerencs´ er. Approximation of SDEs: a stochastic sewing approach. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields , 181(4):975–1034, 2021. 48

    2021

  22. [28]

    Cannizzaro and K

    G. Cannizzaro and K. Chouk. Multidimensional SDEs with singular drift and universal construction of the polymer measure with white noise potential. Ann. Probab., 46(3):1710– 1763, 2018

    2018

  23. [29]

    Cardaliaguet

    P. Cardaliaguet. Mean field games: the master equation and the mean field limit. S´ emin. Laurent Schwartz, EDP Appl. , 2015-2016, 2016

    2015

  24. [30]

    Cardaliaguet, F

    P. Cardaliaguet, F. Delarue, J.-M. Lasry, and P.-L. Lions. The master equation and the convergence problem in mean field games , volume 201 of Ann. Math. Stud. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2019

    2019

  25. [31]

    Carmona and F

    R. Carmona and F. Delarue. Probabilistic theory of mean field games with applications I , volume 84 of Probability Theory and Stochastic Modelling. Springer International Publishing, 2018

    2018

  26. [32]

    Carmona and F

    R. Carmona and F. Delarue. Probabilistic theory of mean field games with applications II , volume 84 of Probability Theory and Stochastic Modelling. Springer International Publishing, 2018

    2018

  27. [33]

    Catellier and K

    R. Catellier and K. Chouk. Paracontrolled distributions and the 3-dimensional stochastic quantization equation. Ann. Probab., 46(5):2621–2679, 2018

    2018

  28. [34]

    P. E. Chaudru de Raynal. Strong well-posedness of McKean-Vlasov stochastic differential equations with H¨ older drift.Stochastic Processes Appl., 130(1):79–107, 2020

    2020

  29. [35]

    Chaudru de Raynal, J.F

    P.E. Chaudru de Raynal, J.F. Jabir, and S. Menozzi. Multidimensional stable driven McKean- Vlasov SDEs with distributional interaction kernel: critical thresholds and related models. Preprint ArXiv 2302.09900 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  30. [36]

    Chaudru de Raynal, J.F

    P.E. Chaudru de Raynal, J.F. Jabir, and S. Menozzi. Multidimensional stable driven McKean- Vlasov SDEs with distributional interaction kernel: a regularization by noise perspective. Stoch PDE: Anal Comp , 13:367–420, 2025

    2025

  31. [37]

    Chaudru de Raynal and S

    P.E. Chaudru de Raynal and S. Menozzi. On Multidimensional stable-driven Stochastic Differential Equations with Besov drift. Electronic Journal of Probability , 27:1–52, 2022

    2022

  32. [38]

    Ciotir, R

    I. Ciotir, R. Fukuizumi, and D. Goreac. The stochastic fast logarithmic equation in Rd with multiplicative Stratonovich noise. J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 542(1):25, 2025. Id/No 128786

    2025

  33. [39]

    Ciotir and F

    I. Ciotir and F. Russo. Probabilistic representation for solutions of a porous media type equation with Neumann boundary condition: The case of the half-line. Differ. Integral Equ., 27(1-2):181–200, 2014

    2014

  34. [40]

    A. M. Davie. Uniqueness of solutions of stochastic differential equations. Int. Math. Res. Not., 2007(24):26, 2007. Id/No rnm124

    2007

  35. [41]

    Delarue and R

    F. Delarue and R. Diel. Rough paths and 1d SDE with a time dependent distributional drift: application to polymers. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 165(1-2):1–63, 2016

    2016

  36. [42]

    Dellacherie and P.-A

    C. Dellacherie and P.-A. Meyer. Probabilities and potential. Transl. from the French, volume 29 of North-Holland Math. Stud. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1978. 49

    1978

  37. [43]

    M. F. Djete. Non–regular McKean–Vlasov equations and calibration problem in local stochas- tic volatility models. Preprint Arxiv 2208.09986, 2022 , 2022

    2022 arXiv

  38. [44]

    Dunford and J

    N. Dunford and J. T. Schwartz. Linear operators. Part I. Wiley Classics Library. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1988. General theory, With the assistance of William G. Bade and Robert G. Bartle, Reprint of the 1958 original, A Wiley-Interscience Publication

    1988

  39. [45]

    B. Dupire. Pricing with a smile. Risk Mag., (7):18–20, 1994

    1994

  40. [46]

    H. J. Engelbert and W. Schmidt. On solutions of one-dimensional stochastic differential equations without drift. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheor. Verw. Geb. , 68:287–314, 1985

    1985

  41. [47]

    S. N. Ethier and T. G. Kurtz. Markov processes. Characterization and convergence. Wiley Ser. Probab. Stat. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2005

    2005

  42. [48]

    Feyel and A

    D. Feyel and A. de La Pradelle. Curvilinear integrals along enriched paths. Electron. J. Probab., 11:860–892, 2006. Id/No 34

    2006

  43. [49]

    A. Figalli. Existence and uniqueness of martingale solutions for SDEs with rough or degenerate coefficients. J. Funct. Anal. , 254(1):109–153, 2008

    2008

  44. [50]

    Flandoli, E

    F. Flandoli, E. Issoglio, and F. Russo. Multidimensional SDEs with distributional coefficients. T. Am. Math. Soc. , 369:1665–1688, 2017

    2017

  45. [51]

    Flandoli, M

    F. Flandoli, M. Leimbach, and Ch. Olivera. Uniform convergence of proliferating particles to the FKPP equation. J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 473(1):27–52, 2019

    2019

  46. [52]

    Flandoli, Ch

    F. Flandoli, Ch. Olivera, and M. Simon. Uniform approximation of 2 dimensional Navier- Stokes equation by stochastic interacting particle systems. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 52(6):5339– 5362, 2020

    2020

  47. [53]

    Flandoli, F

    F. Flandoli, F. Russo, and J. Wolf. Some SDEs with distributional drift. I. General calculus. Osaka J. Math. , 40(2):493–542, 2003

    2003

  48. [54]

    Flandoli, F

    F. Flandoli, F. Russo, and J. Wolf. Some SDEs with distributional drift. II. Lyons-Zheng struc- ture, Itˆ o’s formula and semimartingale characterization.Random Oper. Stochastic Equations, 12(2):145–184, 2004

    2004

  49. [55]

    F¨ ollmer

    H. F¨ ollmer. Calcul d’Itˆ o sans probabilit´ es. In Seminar on Probability, XV (Univ. Stras- bourg, Strasbourg, 1979/1980) (French), volume 850 of Lecture Notes in Math., pages 143–150. Springer, Berlin, 1981

    1979

  50. [56]

    Friedman

    A. Friedman. Stochastic differential equations and applications. Vol. 1. Probability and Mathematical Statistics. Vol. 28. New York - San Francisco - London, 1975

    1975

  51. [57]

    Friesen, B

    M. Friesen, B. R¨ udiger, and P. Sundar. The Enskog process for hard and soft potentials. NoDEA, Nonlinear Differ. Equ. Appl. , 26(3):42, 2019. Id/No 20

    2019

  52. [58]

    Galeati and M

    L. Galeati and M. Gerencs´ er. Solution theory of fractional SDEs in complete subcritical regimes. Forum Math. Sigma , 13:66, 2025. Id/No e12. 50

    2025

  53. [59]

    Galeati, F

    L. Galeati, F. A. Harang, and A. Mayorcas. Distribution dependent SDEs driven by additive fractional Brownian motion. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields , 185(1-2):251–309, 2023

    2023

  54. [60]

    Galeati and Ch

    L. Galeati and Ch. Ling. Stability estimates for singular SDEs and applications. Electronic Journal of Probability , 28(none):1 – 31, 2023

    2023

  55. [61]

    A. M. Garsia, E. Rodemich, and H. jun. Rumsey. A real variable lemma and the continuity of paths of some Gaussian processes. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 20:565–578, 1970

    1970

  56. [62]

    Gouden` ege, El M

    L. Gouden` ege, El M. Haress, and A. Richard. Numerical approximation of SDEs with frac- tional noise and distributional drift. Stochastic Processes Appl., 181:38, 2025. Id/No 104533

    2025

  57. [63]

    Gubinelli

    M. Gubinelli. Controlling rough paths. J. Funct. Anal. , 216(1):86–140, 2004

    2004

  58. [64]

    Gubinelli, P

    M. Gubinelli, P. Imkeller, and N. Perkowski. Paracontrolled distributions and singular PDEs. Forum of Mathematics, Pi , 3:75 pages, 2015

    2015

  59. [65]

    Guyon and P

    J. Guyon and P. Henry-Labord` ere. Nonlinear option pricing . Chapman Hall/CRC Financ. Math. Ser. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2014

    2014

  60. [66]

    Gy¨ ongy

    I. Gy¨ ongy. Mimicking the one-dimensional marginal distributions of processes having an Itˆ o differential. Probability theory and related fields , 71(4):501–516, 1986

    1986

  61. [67]

    Hao, J.-F

    Z. Hao, J.-F. Jabir, S. Menozzi, M. R¨ ockner, and X. Zhang. Propagation of chaos for moder- ately interacting particle systems related to singular kinetic Mckean-Vlasov SDEs. Preprint Arxiv 2405.09195, 2024

    2024

  62. [68]

    Z. Hao, M. R¨ ockner, and X. Zhang. Second order fractional mean-field SDEs with singular kernels and measure initial data. Preprint, arXiv:2302.04392 [math.AP] (2023), 2023

    2023 arXiv

  63. [69]

    Z. Hao, X. Zhang, R. Zhu, and X. Zhu. Singular kinetic equations and applications. Ann. Probab., 52(2):576–657, 2024

    2024

  64. [70]

    U. G. Haussmann and ´E. Pardoux. Time reversal of diffusions.Ann. Probab., 14(4):1188–1205, 1986

    1986

  65. [71]

    Hirsch, Ch

    F. Hirsch, Ch. Profeta, B. Roynette, and M. Yor. Peacocks and associated martingales, with explicit constructions, volume 3 of Bocconi Springer Ser. New York, NY: Springer, 2011

    2011

  66. [72]

    H¨ ormander

    L. H¨ ormander. Hypoelliptic second order differential equations. Acta Math. , 119:147–171, 1967

    1967

  67. [73]

    Huang and F.-Yu

    X. Huang and F.-Yu. Wang. Distribution dependent SDEs with singular coefficients. Stochas- tic Processes Appl., 129(11):4747–4770, 2019

    2019

  68. [74]

    Huang and F.-Yu

    X. Huang and F.-Yu. Wang. McKean-Vlasov SDEs with drifts discontinuous under Wasser- stein distance. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. , 41(4):1667–1679, 2021

    2021

  69. [75]

    Issoglio

    E. Issoglio. A non-linear parabolic PDE with a distributional coefficient and its applications to stochastic analysis. J. Differential Equations , 267(10):5976–6003, 2019

    2019

  70. [77]

    Issoglio and F

    E. Issoglio and F. Russo. A Feynman–Kac result via Markov BSDEs with generalised drivers. Bernoulli, 26(1):728–766, 2020

    2020

  71. [79]

    Issoglio and F

    E. Issoglio and F. Russo. A PDE with drift of negative Besov index and linear growth solutions. Differential and Integral Equations. , 37(9-10):585–622, 2024

    2024

  72. [80]

    Issoglio and F

    E. Issoglio and F. Russo. Stochastic differential equations with singular coefficients: The martingale problem view and the stochastic dynamics view.Journal of Theoretical Probability, pages 1–42, 2024

    2024

  73. [81]

    Izydorczyk, N

    L. Izydorczyk, N. Oudjane, and F. Russo. A fully backward representation of semilinear PDEs applied to the control of thermostatic loads in power systems. Monte Carlo Methods Appl. , 27(4):347–371, 2021

    2021

  74. [82]

    Izydorczyk, N

    L. Izydorczyk, N. Oudjane, F. Russo, and G. Tessitore. Fokker-Planck equations with terminal condition and related McKean probabilistic representation. NoDEA, Nonlinear Differ. Equ. Appl., 29(1):41, 2022. Id/No 10

    2022

  75. [83]

    Jourdain and S

    B. Jourdain and S. M´ el´ eard. Propagation of chaos and fluctuations for a moderate model with smooth initial data. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Probab. Statist., 34(6):727–766, 1998

    1998

  76. [84]

    Kamin and J.-L

    S. Kamin and J.-L. Vazquez. Asymptotic behaviour of solutions of the porous medium equa- tion with changing sign. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 22(1):34–45, 1991

    1991

  77. [85]

    Karatzas and S.E

    I. Karatzas and S.E. Shreve. Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus . Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer New York, 1991

    1991

  78. [86]

    N. V. Krylov and M. R¨ ockner. Strong solutions of stochastic equations with singular time dependent drift. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields , 131(2):154–196, 2005

    2005

  79. [87]

    D. Lacker. On the convergence of closed-loop Nash equilibria to the mean field game limit. Ann. Appl. Probab., 30(4):1693–1761, 2020

    2020

  80. [88]

    O. A. Ladyzhenskaya, V. A. Solonnikov, and N. N. Ural’tseva. Linear and quasi-linear equa- tions of parabolic type. Translated from the Russian by S. Smith , volume 23 of Transl. Math. Monogr. American Mathematical Society (AMS), Providence, RI, 1968

    1968

  81. [89]

    Lasry and P.-L

    J.-M. Lasry and P.-L. Lions. Mean field games. Jpn. J. Math. (3) , 2(1):229–260, 2007

    2007

  82. [90]

    Latt` es and J.-L

    R. Latt` es and J.-L. Lions. The method of quasi-reversibility. Applications to partial differen- tial equations. Translated from the French edition and edited by Richard Bellman. Modern Analytic and Computational Methods in Science and Mathematics, No. 18. American Elsevier P...

    1969

  83. [91]

    K. Lˆ e. A stochastic sewing lemma and applications. Electron. J. Probab., 25:55, 2020. Id/No 38. 52

    2020

  84. [92]

    Le Cavil, N

    A. Le Cavil, N. Oudjane, and F. Russo. Particle system algorithm and chaos propagation related to a non-conservative McKean type stochastic differential equations. Stochastics and Partial Differential Equations: Analysis and Computation. , pages 1–37, 2016

    2016

  85. [93]

    Le Cavil, N

    A. Le Cavil, N. Oudjane, and F. Russo. Probabilistic representation of a class of non- conservative nonlinear partial differential equations. ALEA Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat , 13(2):1189–1233, 2016

    2016

  86. [94]

    Notes on the stationary p-Laplace equation

    Peter Lindqvist. Notes on the stationary p-Laplace equation. SpringerBriefs Math. Cham: Springer; Bilbao: BCAM – Basque Center for Applied Mathematics, 2019

    2019

  87. [95]

    H. P. jun. McKean. A class of Markov processes associated with nonlinear parabolic equations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA , 56:1907–1911, 1966

    1907

  88. [96]

    M´ el´ eard

    S. M´ el´ eard. Asymptotic behaviour of some interacting particle systems; McKean-Vlasov and Boltzmann models. In Probabilistic models for nonlinear partial differential equations. Lectures given at the 1st session of the Centro Internazionale Matematico Estivo, Montecatini Te...

    1995

  89. [97]

    Meleard and S

    S. Meleard and S. Roelly-Coppoletta. A propagation of chaos result for a system of particles with moderate interaction. Stochastic Processes Appl., 26:317–332, 1987

    1987

  90. [98]

    D. Nualart. The Malliavin calculus and related topics . Probability and its Applications (New York). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, second edition, 2006

    2006

  91. [99]

    Oelschl¨ ager

    K. Oelschl¨ ager. A law of large numbers for moderately interacting diffusion processes. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie verw Gebiete , 69:279–322, 1985

    1985

  92. [100]

    Olivera, A

    Ch. Olivera, A. Richard, and M. Tomasevic. Quantitative approximation of the Burgers and Keller-Segel equations by moderately interacting particles. Preprint Arxiv 2004.03177 , 2020

    2004 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Olivera, A

    Ch. Olivera, A. Richard, and M. Tomasevic. Quantitative particle approximation of nonlin- ear fokker-planck equations with singular kernel. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) , 24(2):691–749, 2023

    2023

  94. [102]

    Pagliarani, G

    S. Pagliarani, G. Lucertini, and A. Pascucci. Optimal regularity for degenerate Kolmogorov equations in non-divergence form with rough-in-time coefficients. J. Evol. Equ. , 23(4):37,

  95. [103]

    Pardoux and S

    ´E. Pardoux and S. G. Peng. Backward stochastic differential equations and quasilinear parabolic partial differential equations. Rozuvskii B L, Sowers R B, eds. Stochastic Par- tial Differential Equations and Their Applications. Lect Notes Control Inf Sci. , 176:200–217, 1992

    1992

  96. [104]

    Pascucci, A

    A. Pascucci, A. Rondelli, and A. Yu Veretennikov. Existence and uniqueness re- sults for strongly degenerate McKean-Vlasov equations with rough coefficients. Preprint Arxiv2409.14451, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  97. [105]

    N. I. Portenko. Obobshchennye diffuzionnye protsessy . Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1982. 53

    1982

  98. [106]

    Revuz and M

    D. Revuz and M. Yor. Continuous martingales and Brownian motion , volume 293 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences]. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, third edition, 1999

    1999

  99. [107]

    R¨ ockner, L

    M. R¨ ockner, L. Xie, and X. Zhang. Superposition principle for non-local Fokker-Planck- Kolmogorov operators. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields , 178(3-4):699–733, 2020

    2020

  100. [108]

    R¨ ockner and X

    M. R¨ ockner and X. Zhang. Well-posedness of distribution dependent SDEs with singular drifts. Bernoulli, 27(2):1131–1158, 2021

    2021

  101. [109]

    Russo and G

    F. Russo and G. Trutnau. Some parabolic PDEs whose drift is an irregular random noise in space. Ann. Probab., 35(6):2213–2262, 2007

    2007

  102. [110]

    Russo and P

    F. Russo and P. Vallois. Stochastic calculus with respect to continuous finite quadratic variation processes. Stochastics Stochastics Rep., 70(1-2):1–40, 2000

    2000

  103. [111]

    Russo and P

    F. Russo and P. Vallois. Stochastic Calculus via Regularizations , volume 11. Springer Inter- national Publishing. Springer-Bocconi, 2022

    2022

  104. [112]

    Y. Sawano. Theory of Besov spaces , volume 56 of Dev. Math. Singapore: Springer, 2018

    2018

  105. [113]

    Y. Song, J. Sohl-Dickstein, D. P. Kingma, A. Kumar, S. Ermon, and B. Poole. Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations. in international conference on learning representations. International Conference on Learning Representations , 2021

    2021

  106. [114]

    D. W. Stroock and S. R. S. Varadhan. Multidimensional diffusion processes , volume 233 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences]. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1979

    1979

  107. [115]

    Sznitman

    A. Sznitman. Topics in propagation of chaos , volume 1464 of Ecole d’´ et´ e de probabilit´ es de Saint-Flour XIX—1989 . Springer, 1989

    1989

  108. [116]

    H. Tanaka. Probabilistic treatment of the Boltzmann equation of Maxwellian molecules. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheor. Verw. Geb., 46:67–105, 1978

    1978

  109. [117]

    A. N. Tikhonov and V. Y. Arsenin. Solutions of ill-posed problems . V. H. Winston & Sons, Washington, D.C.: John Wiley & Sons, New York-Toronto, Ont.-London, 1977. Translated from the Russian, Preface by translation editor Fritz John, Scripta Series in Mathematics

    1977

  110. [118]

    Trevisan

    D. Trevisan. Well-posedness of multidimensional diffusion processes with weakly differentiable coefficients. Electron. J. Probab., 21:41, 2016. Id/No 22

    2016

  111. [119]

    V´ azquez

    J.-L. V´ azquez. Smoothing and decay estimates for nonlinear diffusion equations. Equations of porous medium type , volume 33 of Oxf. Lect. Ser. Math. Appl. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006

    2006

  112. [120]

    J. L. V´ azquez. The porous medium equation. Mathematical theory . Oxford Math. Monogr. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007

    2007

  113. [121]

    J. L. Vazquez, J. R. Esteban, and A. Rodriguez. The fast diffusion equation with logarithmic nonlinearity and the evolution of conformal metrics in the plane.Adv. Differ. Equ., 1(1):21–50, 1996. 54

    1996

  114. [122]

    Veretennikov

    A. Veretennikov. On weak existence of solutions of degenerate McKean-Vlasov equations. Stoch. Dyn., 24(5):15, 2024. Id/No 2450032

    2024

  115. [123]

    X. Zhang. Second order McKean-Vlasov SDEs and kinetic Fokker-Planck-Kolmogorov equa- tions. Preprint ArXiv:2109.01273, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  116. [124]

    Zhang and X

    X. Zhang and X. Zhang. Cauchy problem of stochastic kinetic equations. Ann. Appl. Probab. 34, pages 148–202, 2024

    2024

  117. [125]

    Zhang and G

    X. Zhang and G. Zhao. Heat kernel and ergodicity of SDEs with distributional drifts. Preprint Arxiv 1710.10537, 2017

    2017 arXiv

  118. [126]

    A. K. Zvonkin. A transformation of the phase space of a diffusion process that removes the drift. Math. USSR, Sb. , 22:129–149, 1975. 55

    1975

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.