Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Asymptotics for aggregated interdependent multivariate subexponential claims with general investment returns

T0 review · 1 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that, for three heavy-tailed regimes, the probability that the discounted aggregate multivariate claim vector enters a rare set $xA$ is asymptotically equal to the integrated single-claim probability $\int_0^T…

desk verdict Useful extension of multivariate heavy-tailed asymptotics to dependent claim vectors; the infinite-time theorem has a repairable proof gap, not a fatal flaw. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.23713 v3 pith:3RH46ZWD submitted 2025-07-31 math.PR

Zhangting Chen , Dimitrios G. Konstantinides , Charalampos D. Passalidis This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PR MSC 62P0560G70
keywords multivariatesubexponentialityconsistentlyvaryingclassruinprobabilitydependencestructuregeneralstochasticreturnsrenewalriskmodelsinglebigjumpraresetasymptotics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes a 'single big jump' asymptotic for the discounted aggregate claim vector in a multivariate renewal risk model: for a rare set $xA$, the probability that the aggregate $D(T)$ lands in $xA$ is asymptotically the same as the integral of the probability that one discounted claim $Xe^{-\xi(s)}$ already lies in $xA$, integrated against the renewal measure $\lambda(ds)$. The equivalence, relation (1.3), is proved for finite horizons in two regimes — multivariate subexponential claims with regression-dependent claim vectors and non-decreasing returns, and multivariate consistently varying claims with quasi-asymptotically independent claim vectors and returns bounded away from $-\infty$ — and for the infinite horizon under a moment condition on the discounted factors that lets the bounded-below assumption drop. The consequence is that the tail of the aggregate is governed by one extreme claim, with dependence among claims entering only through the scalarized projection $Y_A=\sup\{u:X\in uA\}$. The framework goes beyond multivariate regular variation and allows the claim vectors themselves to be dependent, which earlier continuous-time multivariate results did not; the authors note the results are new even in the one-dimensional subcase.

What carries the argument

The engine of the paper is the sup-scalarization $Y_A=\sup\{u:X\in uA\}$, which turns the multivariate rare-set event $\{X\in xA\}$ into the univariate tail event $\{Y_A>x\}$ (valid for sets $A$ in the family $\mathcal{R}$ of open, increasing sets with convex complement and $0\notin A$, by known lemmas). This reduction carries the heavy-tailed class and the dependence definitions: RD$_A$ and QAI$_A$ are by definition properties of the scalarized variables $Y_A^{(i)}$. The proofs then use multivariate single big jump lemmas for the weighted sums of such variables (Lemma 4.1 for RD$_A$, Lemma 4.3 for QAI$_A$), a Kesten-type inequality for regression-dependent subexponential variables (Lemma 4.2) to dismiss the many-claims region, and, for the infinite horizon, Assumption 3.1's moment condition on $e^{-p\xi(\tau_i)}$ to make the discounted tail probabilities summable. In the multivariate regularly varying special case, Breiman's theorem converts the integrals into closed forms $\mu(A)G(x)\int_0^T E[e^{-\alpha\xi(s)}]\lambda(ds)$.

What would settle it

Build the model of the paper's Example 2.2 (two bivariate QAI$_A$ claim vectors with heavy-tailed margins) with a consistently varying but non-regularly-varying margin, a L\'evy return process with negative Laplace exponent on $[p_1,p_2]$, and a fixed $T$, then evaluate the ratio in (1.3) at large $x$ by simulation or asymptotic expansion. If the ratio converges to anything other than 1, the central relation is false; a single such example would settle it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is relation (1.3): for fixed $T\in\Lambda$, $$\lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{P[D(T)\in xA]}{\int_0^T P[$Xe^{{-\xi(s)}}$\in xA]\,\$\lambda$(ds)} = 1,$$ holds when (a) $F\in S_A$, the claim vectors are regression dependent on $A$ (RD$_A$), and $\xi$ has non-decreasing sample paths (Theorem 3.1); (b) $F\in C_A$, the claim vectors are quasi-asymptotically independent on $A$ (QAI$_A$), and $\xi$ is bounded away from $-\infty$ on finite horizons (Theorem 3.2); or (c) $T=\infty$, $F\in (C\cap PD)_A$, the claims are QAI$_A$, and a moment condition on $e^{-p\xi(\tau_i)}$ for $p$ straddling the Matuszewska indices of $F_A$ replaces the bounded-below assumption (Theorem 3.3). The discovery is that the multivariate single big jump principle survives dependent claim vectors and general stochastic returns, as long as the dependence and distribution classes are matched: the asymptotic tail of the aggregate in direction $A$ is carried by a single claim, and all dependence among claims enters through the scalarization $Y_A$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the scalarization $Y_A=\sup\{u:X\in uA\}$ preserves both the heavy-tailed distribution class and the RD$_A$/QAI$_A$ dependence conditions exactly as the proofs use them, so that the single-big-jump lemmas apply to the discounted scalarized claims; if that preservation fails, relation (1.3) has no foundation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the paper is right, the asymptotic probability of entering a rare set is decided by a single discounted claim; in the multivariate regularly varying case this is explicit: $P[D(T)\in xA]\sim \mu(A) G(x)\int_0^T E[e^{-\alpha\xi(s)}]\lambda(ds)$, and likewise for $T=\infty$ (Corollaries 3.1 and 3.2).
  • The theorems apply beyond multivariate regular variation: claim vectors whose marginals have non-equivalent tails, such as a Pareto component with a lognormal or Weibull component, fall inside $C_A$ or $(C\cap PD)_A$, so the asymptotic formula holds where MRV-based models do not apply (Remark 3.5).
  • Dependence among claim vectors is covered by two named structures, regression dependence on $A$ (RD$_A$) and quasi-asymptotic independence on $A$ (QAI$_A$), each containing independence as a special case; this extends earlier continuous-time multivariate renewal risk models that required independent claim vectors.
  • Under a constant interest force, Poisson arrivals and $F_A\in R_{-\alpha}$, the conditional first-entrance time into the rare set has an exponential limit distribution with parameter $\alpha r$ (Remark 3.6).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural question the paper leaves open is whether Theorem 3.1's monotonicity of $\xi$ and Theorem 3.2's consistently varying assumption trade against each other: could (1.3) already hold for $S_A$ claims with QAI$_A$ dependence and non-monotone but bounded returns? The assumptions of the two theorems are not shown to be necessary.
  • The same $Y_A$-scalarization likely transfers the single-big-jump asymptotic to other rare-set families or to multivariate risk measures built from such sets, as long as the projection stays heavy-tailed; the paper does not pursue this beyond the family $\mathcal{R}$.
  • The $1/\rho$ exponent in the infinite-horizon moment condition (3.2) is the only place Matuszewska indices enter quantitatively; testing whether the exponent is optimal, for instance by constructing a return process on the boundary of condition (3.2) whose discounted sums still converge, would probe how sharp Assumption 3.1 is.
  • Because the method reduces everything to the univariate tail of $Y_A$, it plausibly extends to claim vectors whose components are asymptotically dependent as well as asymptotically independent, provided $F_A$ remains in the heavy-tailed class; the paper only needs the scalarized variables to be RD$_A$ or QAI$_A$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies a continuous-time multivariate renewal risk model with d lines of business, a stochastic log-return process ξ, and the discounted aggregate claim vector D(T) = Σ_{i=1}^{N(T)} X^{(i)} e^{-ξ(τ_i)}. For a family R of increasing rare sets A, it claims the asymptotic relation P[D(T)∈xA] ~ ∫_0^T P[Xe^{-ξ(s)}∈xA] λ(ds) for fixed T. Theorem 3.1 proves this for F∈S_A with RD_A-dependent claims and non-decreasing ξ; Theorem 3.2 proves it for F∈C_A with QAI_A-dependent claims under a lower-bounded ξ; Theorem 3.3 extends the relation to T=∞ under F∈(C∩PD)_A and a moment condition on e^{-ξ(τ_i)}. Corollaries give explicit multivariate regularly varying versions. The proofs use the scalarization Y_A = sup{u : X∈uA} and a single-big-jump strategy.

Significance. If correct, the results give a clean, parameter-free asymptotic for multivariate entrance probabilities that goes beyond the MRV framework, and they allow meaningful dependence among the claim vectors through the new RD_A and QAI_A structures. The finite-time results are valuable and appear to be proved along established lines. The infinite-time theorem is the most novel part, but its proof rests on a key inequality that is not justified in the manuscript, so the strongest claim is not yet established.

major comments (1)
  1. [§4.3, Lemma 4.4, Eq. (4.24)] The second inequality in (4.24) is load-bearing and is not established by the cited reference. The text justifies it by invoking [19, Th. 3.3(iv)], but that theorem concerns subexponentiality of products; it is not shown to yield a lower bound for P[Xe^{-ξ(τ_1)}∈xA] of the order F_A(x)(E[e^{-p1ξ(τ_1)}]∨E[e^{-p2ξ(τ_1)}])^{1/ρ}. In the regularly varying case, if θ is deterministic with θ=c, then P[Y_A θ>x] is asymptotically c^α F_A(x), whereas the first-line upper bound is of order (c^{p1}∨c^{p2})F_A(x); these two quantities are not comparable by a universal constant as c varies, and the discrepancy is worse when ρ=p2 for α≥1. Since Lemma 4.4 is used both in (4.25) to justify the upper bound of the infinite series and in (4.26) to pass M→∞, Theorem 3.3 is not proved as written. Please provide a direct proof of (4.24) or revise Assumption 3.1 so that the denominator admits a matching lower bound.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§4.2, proof of Corollary 3.1] The domination bound states F_A(e^{-K_T}x)/F_A(x) ≤ 2e^{-2αK_T}; since F_A∈R_{-α}, the ratio tends to e^{αK_T}, not e^{-2αK_T}. The conclusion is unaffected because the constant is still finite, but the displayed inequality should be corrected.
  2. [Assumption 3.1] The definition of ρ is typeset in a garbled way: ρ = 1 0<J^+<1 + p_2 1_{J^+≥1} should be written as ρ = 1_{0<J^+_{F_A}<1} + p_2 1_{J^+_{F_A}≥1}.
  3. [Throughout] There are numerous typographical errors, including 'operatesd-lines' in the first sentence, 'rivisit' in reference [10], and inconsistent spellings such as 'Matuszeska' for Matuszewska. A careful proofreading pass is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main relation (1.3) is derived from external single-big-jump results, and the same-author citations are auxiliary rather than presupposing the target.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. Relation (1.3) is obtained by combining the scalarized variables Y_A from [62] (external), univariate single-big-jump and Kesten-type results from [28], [29], [11], [45], [75] (external), and two self-cited ingredients. The self-cited [37, Prop. 2.4] is used only as a bounding step of the form P[sum W_i Z^(i) in xA] <= P[sum W_i Z_A^(i) > x] in the proofs of Theorems 3.1 and 3.2; it is a preliminary set-inclusion/linearization inequality, not a statement of the asymptotic equivalence (1.3). The definitions of RD_A and QAI_A are made directly in terms of Y_A, so any reduction of the vector problem to scalarized variables is by explicit definition, not a hidden assumption of the conclusion. The most novel infinite-time regime (Theorem 3.3) is proved via Lemma 4.4, which relies only on [75, Lem. 1] and [19, Th. 3.3(iv)], both external to the authors. The reviewer's concern about inequality (4.24) is a potential correctness issue concerning an external theorem's applicability, not a circularity: it does not make the derivation equivalent to its own inputs. No fitted parameters, no data subset, and no uniqueness claim imported from the authors appear in the argument. Accordingly, the manuscript does not exhibit a self-definitional, fitted-input-as-prediction, or self-citation-forcing pattern.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities appear. The results rest on standard heavy-tailed distribution classes, the renewal model, and three explicit modeling assumptions (1.1, 1.2, 3.1). The main unproved inputs are external theorems whose conditions are cited rather than restated.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Assumption 1.1: claim vectors, renewal counting process and return process are mutually independent, and claims are i.i.d. copies of X with distribution F.
    Used in all theorems and proofs to factor probabilities over N(T), τ_i and ξ; if arrivals or returns are correlated with claims, the factorization fails.
  • domain assumption Assumption 1.2: ξ is almost surely bounded away from -∞ on finite intervals, so e^{-ξ} is bounded above on [0,T].
    Needed in Theorem 3.2 and Corollary 3.1 for bounded weights and for applying Breiman's theorem; excludes investment strategies with unbounded short positions.
  • domain assumption Assumption 3.1: the moment condition (3.2) on e^{-p1 ξ(τ_i)} and e^{-p2 ξ(τ_i)} with p1<J_-≤J_+<p2.
    Gives integrability for the infinite-horizon sum in Theorem 3.3 and Corollary 3.2, replacing the lower-bound condition.
  • standard math The family R of sets and the scalarization Z_A = sup{u: Z∈uA} satisfy the identities (2.8)-(2.9) from Samorodnitsky and Sun [62].
    Bridges multivariate events and univariate tails; all theorems and examples rely on this reduction.
  • standard math External results: exponential moments for renewal counting processes [33], [63]; randomly weighted sum single-big-jump results [28], [67]; Kesten-type inequality [29]; Breiman's theorem [5], [19]; tail approximations [45], [47], [75].
    The proofs are a chain of citations to established results; the paper does not reprove these ingredients.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Asymptotics for aggregated interdependent multivariate subexponential claims with general investment returns." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3RH46ZWD

@misc{pith2026250723713,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Asymptotics for aggregated interdependent multivariate subexponential claims with general investment returns},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3RH46ZWD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.23713}
}
read the original abstract

This paper investigates asymptotic estimates for the entrance probability of the discounted aggregate claim vector from a multivariate renewal risk model into some rare set. We provide asymptotic results for the entrance probability on both finite and infinite time horizons under various assumptions regarding the stochastic price process of the investment portfolio, the distribution class of claim vectors, and the dependence structure among the claim vectors. We note that the main results extend beyond the class of multivariate regular variation. Furthermore, we introduce two dependence structures to model the dependence among the claim vectors. In particular, our results are new even in the one-dimensional subcase.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Uniform asymptotics for a multidimensional renewal risk model with random number of delayed claims and multivariate subexponentiality

    math.PR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Uniform asymptotics are obtained for entrance probabilities of discounted claims into rare sets in a multidimensional renewal risk model with random delayed claims under multivariate subexponentiality.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    \ (2003) Applied Probability and Queues Springer, New York, 2nd ed

    Asmussen, S. \ (2003) Applied Probability and Queues Springer, New York, 2nd ed

    work page 2003

  2. [2]

    \ (2011) Characterization of tails through hazard rate and convolution closure properties

    Bardoutsos, A.G., Konstantinides, D.G. \ (2011) Characterization of tails through hazard rate and convolution closure properties. J. Appl. Probab. , 48A, 123--132

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    N.H., Goldie, C.M., Teugels, J.L

    Bingham. N.H., Goldie, C.M., Teugels, J.L. \ (1987) Regular Variation Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    1987

  4. [4]

    \ (2009)

    Bj\"ork, T. \ (2009). Arbitrage theory in continuous time Oxford University Press, Oxford

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    \ (1965) On some limit theorems similar to arc-sin law

    Breiman L. \ (1965) On some limit theorems similar to arc-sin law. Theory Probab. Appl. , 10, 323--331

    work page 1965

  6. [6]

    A.A., Borovkov, K.A

    Borovkov. A.A., Borovkov, K.A. \ (2008) Asymptotic Analysis of Random Walks: Heavy-Tailed Distributions Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    \ (2023) An Asymptotic Result on Catastrophe Insurance Losses

    Chen, Y., Liu J. \ (2023) An Asymptotic Result on Catastrophe Insurance Losses. N. Am. Actuar. J. 28, no.2, 426--437

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    \ (2024) Asymptotic capital allocation based on higher moment risk measure

    Chen, Y., Liu J. \ (2024) Asymptotic capital allocation based on higher moment risk measure. Eur. Actuar. J. , https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-024-00378-4

    doi:10.1007/s13385-024-00378-4 2024

Show all 74 references
  1. [9]

    \ (2019) Bivariate regular variation among randomly weighted sums in general insurance

    Chen, Y., Yang, Y. \ (2019) Bivariate regular variation among randomly weighted sums in general insurance. Eur. Actuar. J. 9, 301--322

    2019

  2. [10]

    \ (2017) A rivisit to ruin probabilities in the presence of heavy-tailed insurance and financial risks

    Chen, Y., Yuan, Z. \ (2017) A rivisit to ruin probabilities in the presence of heavy-tailed insurance and financial risks. Insur. Math. Econom. 73, 75--81

    2017

  3. [11]

    \ (2009) Sums of pairwise quasi-asymptotic independent random variables with consistent variation

    Chen, Y., Yuen, K.C. \ (2009) Sums of pairwise quasi-asymptotic independent random variables with consistent variation. Stochastic Models , 25, 76--89

    2009

  4. [12]

    \ (2023) Asymptotics for sum-ruin probabilities of a bidimensional risk model with heavy-tailed claims and stochastic returns

    Chen, Z., Li, M., Cheng, D. \ (2023) Asymptotics for sum-ruin probabilities of a bidimensional risk model with heavy-tailed claims and stochastic returns. Stochastics , 96, no.2, 947--967

    2023

  5. [14]

    \ (2014) Randomly weighted sums of dependent random variables with dominated variation

    Cheng, D. \ (2014) Randomly weighted sums of dependent random variables with dominated variation. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 420, no. 3, 1617--1633

    2014

  6. [15]

    Cheng, M., Konstantinides, D.G., Wang, D \ (2022) Uniform asymptotic estimates in a time-dependent risk model with general investment returns and multivariate regularly varying claims. Appl. Math. and Comput. , 434, 127436

    2022

  7. [16]

    \ (2024) Multivariate regular varying insurance and financial risks in d -dimensional risk model

    Cheng, M., Konstantinides, D.G., Wang, D. \ (2024) Multivariate regular varying insurance and financial risks in d -dimensional risk model. J. Appl. Probab. , 61, no. 4, 1319 -- 1342

    2024

  8. [17]

    \ (1964) A theorem on sums of independent positive random variables and its applications to branching random processes

    Chistyakov, V.P. \ (1964) A theorem on sums of independent positive random variables and its applications to branching random processes. Theory Probab. Appl. , 9, 640--648

    1964

  9. [18]

    \ (1994) Intermediate regular and variation

    Cline, D.B.H. \ (1994) Intermediate regular and variation. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. , 68, 594--611

    1994

  10. [19]

    \ (1994) Subexponentiality of the product of independent random variables

    Cline, D.B.H., Samorodnitsky, G. \ (1994) Subexponentiality of the product of independent random variables. Stoch. Process. Appl. , 49, 75--98

    1994

  11. [20]

    \ (2004) Financial Modelling with Jump Processes

    Cont, R., Tankov, P. \ (2004) Financial Modelling with Jump Processes. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL

    2004

  12. [21]

    \ (2025) A Breiman's Theorem for conditional dependent random vector and its applications to risk theory Theory Probabab

    Cui, Z., Wang, Y. \ (2025) A Breiman's Theorem for conditional dependent random vector and its applications to risk theory Theory Probabab. Appl. 70, no.2, 291--313

    2025

  13. [22]

    \ (1981) On the observation closet to the origin

    De Haan, L., Resnick, S. \ (1981) On the observation closet to the origin. Stoch. Process. Appl. , 11, no. 3, 301--308

    1981

  14. [23]

    and Mikosch, T

    Embrechts, P., Kl\" u pellberg, C. and Mikosch, T. \ (1997) Modelling Extremal Events for Insurance and Finance. Springer, New York

    1997

  15. [24]

    \ (1969) One-sided analogues of Karamata's regular variation

    Feller, W. \ (1969) One-sided analogues of Karamata's regular variation. L' enseignement Math\' e matique , 15, 107--121

    1969

  16. [25]

    \ (2013) An Introduction to Heavy-Tailed and Subexponential Distributions

    Foss, S., Korshunov, D., Zachary, S. \ (2013) An Introduction to Heavy-Tailed and Subexponential Distributions. Springer, New York, 2nd ed

    2013

  17. [26]

    \ (2009) Asymptotic tail probabilities of sums of dependent subexponential random variables

    Geluk, J., Tang, Q. \ (2009) Asymptotic tail probabilities of sums of dependent subexponential random variables. J. Theor. Probab. , 22, 871--882

    2009

  18. [27]

    \ (2024) On tail behavior of randomly weighted sums of dependent subexponential random variables

    Geng, B., Liu, Z., Wang, S. \ (2024) On tail behavior of randomly weighted sums of dependent subexponential random variables. Comm. Stat. Theor. Meth. 53, no. 5, 1653--1668

    2024

  19. [28]

    \ (2023) A Kesten-type inequality for randomly weighted sums of dependent subexponential random variables with application to risk theory

    Geng, B., Liu, Z., Wang, S. \ (2023) A Kesten-type inequality for randomly weighted sums of dependent subexponential random variables with application to risk theory. Lith. Math. J. 63, 81--91

    2023

  20. [29]

    \ (1978) Subexponential distributions and dominated variation tails J

    Goldie, C.M. \ (1978) Subexponential distributions and dominated variation tails J. Appl. Probab. , 15, 440--442

    1978

  21. [30]

    \ (2013) Finite-and infinite-time ruin probabilities with general stochastic investment return processes and bivariate upper tail independent and heavy tailed claims

    Guo,F., Wang, D. \ (2013) Finite-and infinite-time ruin probabilities with general stochastic investment return processes and bivariate upper tail independent and heavy tailed claims. Adv. Appl. Probab. , 12, no.4, 241--273

    2013

  22. [31]

    de, Resnick, S

    Haan, L. de, Resnick, S. \ (1984) Stochastic compactness and point processes. J. Aust. Math. Soc. Ser. A , 37, 307--316

    1984

  23. [32]

    \ (2014) Max-sum equivalence of conditionally dependent random variables

    Jiang, T., Gao, Q., Wang, Y. \ (2014) Max-sum equivalence of conditionally dependent random variables. Stat. Probab. Lett. , 84, 60--66

    2014

  24. [33]

    \ (2009) A property of the renewal counting process with application to the finite-time ruin probability

    Ko c etova, J., Leipus, R., S iaulys, J. \ (2009) A property of the renewal counting process with application to the finite-time ruin probability. Lith. Math. J. , 49, no.1, 55--61

    2009

  25. [34]

    \ (2016) Asymptotic ruin probabilities for a multidimensional renewal risk model with multivariate regularly varying claims

    Konstantinides, D.G., Li, J. \ (2016) Asymptotic ruin probabilities for a multidimensional renewal risk model with multivariate regularly varying claims. Insur. Math. and Econom. , 69, 38--44

    2016

  26. [35]

    \ (2025) Uniform asymptotics for a multidimensional renewal risk model with multivariate subexponential claims

    Konstantinides, D.G., Liu, J., Passalidis, C.D. \ (2025) Uniform asymptotics for a multidimensional renewal risk model with multivariate subexponential claims. Scand. Actuar. J. , p. 1 -- 21. DOI: 10.1080/03461238.2025.2584008

    2025

  27. [36]

    \ (2025) Background risk model in presence of heavy tails under dependence

    Konstantinides, D.G., Passalidis, C.D. \ (2025) Background risk model in presence of heavy tails under dependence. Nonlin. Anal. Model. Contr. , 30, no. 5, 982 -- 1010

    2025

  28. [37]

    \ (2024) Random vectors in the presence of a single big jump

    Konstantinides, D.G., Passalidis, C.D. \ (2024) Random vectors in the presence of a single big jump. Preprint, arXiv:2410.10292

    2024 arXiv

  29. [38]

    \ (2025) Uniform asymptotic estimates for ruin probabilities of a multidimensional risk model with c\' a dl\' a g returns and multivariate heavy-tailed claims

    Konstantinides, D.G., Passalidis, C.D. \ (2025) Uniform asymptotic estimates for ruin probabilities of a multidimensional risk model with c\' a dl\' a g returns and multivariate heavy-tailed claims. Insur. Math. Econom. , 125 , 103148

    2025

  30. [39]

    \ (2025) Heavy-tailed random vectors: theory and applications

    Konstantinides, D.G., Passalidis, C.D. \ (2025) Heavy-tailed random vectors: theory and applications. Preprint, arXiv:2503.12842

    2025 arXiv

  31. [40]

    \ (2025) A new approach in two-dimensional heavy-tailed distributions

    Konstantinides, D.G., Passalidis, C.D. \ (2025) A new approach in two-dimensional heavy-tailed distributions. Ann. Actuar. Scien. , 19, no.2, 317 -- 349

    2025

  32. [41]

    \ (2025) Positively decreasing and related distributions under dependence

    Konstantinides, D.G., Passalidis, C.D. \ (2025) Positively decreasing and related distributions under dependence. Theor. Probab. Appl. , 70, no.3, 461 -- 486

    2025

  33. [42]

    \ (1966) Some concepts of dependence

    Lehmann, E.L. \ (1966) Some concepts of dependence. Ann. Math. Stat. , 37, 1137--1153

    1966

  34. [43]

    \ (2023) Closure Properties for Heavy-Tailed and Related Distributions: An Overview

    Leipus, R., S iaulys, J., Konstantinides, D.G. \ (2023) Closure Properties for Heavy-Tailed and Related Distributions: An Overview. Springer Nature, Cham Switzerland

    2023

  35. [44]

    \ (2012) Asymptotics in a time-dependent renewal risk model with stochastic return

    Li, J. \ (2012) Asymptotics in a time-dependent renewal risk model with stochastic return. J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 387, 1009--1023

    2012

  36. [45]

    \ (2013) On pairwise quasi-asymptotically independent random variables and their applications

    Li, J. \ (2013) On pairwise quasi-asymptotically independent random variables and their applications. Stat. Prob. Lett. , 83, 2081--2087

    2013

  37. [46]

    \ (2016) Uniform asymptotics for a multi-dimensional time-dependent risk model with multivariate regularly varying claims and stochastic return

    Li, J. \ (2016) Uniform asymptotics for a multi-dimensional time-dependent risk model with multivariate regularly varying claims and stochastic return. Insur. Math. Econom. , 71, 195--204

    2016

  38. [47]

    \ (2018) On the joint tail behavior of randomly weighted sums of heavy-tailed random variables

    Li, J. \ (2018) On the joint tail behavior of randomly weighted sums of heavy-tailed random variables. J. Mutlivar. Anal. , 164, 40--53

    2018

  39. [48]

    \ (2022) Asymptotic Analysis of a Dynamic Systemic Risk Measure in a Renewal Risk Model

    Li, J. \ (2022) Asymptotic Analysis of a Dynamic Systemic Risk Measure in a Renewal Risk Model. Insur. Math. Econom. , 107, 38--56

    2022

  40. [49]

    \ (2023) Asymptotic ruin probabilities for a two-dimensional risk model with dependent claims and stochastic return

    Li, J. \ (2023) Asymptotic ruin probabilities for a two-dimensional risk model with dependent claims and stochastic return. Comm. Stat. Th. Meth. , 53, no.16, 5773--5784

    2023

  41. [50]

    \ (2023(b)) Asymptotic results on tail moment and tail central moment for dependent risks

    Li, J. \ (2023(b)) Asymptotic results on tail moment and tail central moment for dependent risks. Adv. Appl. Probab. , 55, no. 4, 1116-1143

    2023

  42. [51]

    \ (2025) The principle of a single big from the perspective of tail momment risk measure

    Li, J. \ (2025) The principle of a single big from the perspective of tail momment risk measure. Insur. Math. Econom. , 124, 103118

    2025

  43. [52]

    \ (2015) Interplay of insurance and financial risks in a discrete time model with strongly regular variation

    Li, J., Tang, Q. \ (2015) Interplay of insurance and financial risks in a discrete time model with strongly regular variation. Bernoulli 21, no.3, 1800--1823

    2015

  44. [53]

    \ (2024) Asymptotics of the loss-based tail risk measures in the presence of extreme risks

    Liu, J., Shushi, T. \ (2024) Asymptotics of the loss-based tail risk measures in the presence of extreme risks. Eur. Actuar. J. , 14, 205--224

    2024

  45. [54]

    \ (2014) Asymptotic analysis of risk quantities conditional on ruin for multidimensional heavy-tailed random walks

    Liu, J., Woo, J.K. \ (2014) Asymptotic analysis of risk quantities conditional on ruin for multidimensional heavy-tailed random walks. Insur. Math. Econom. , 55, 1--9

    2014

  46. [55]

    \ (2024) Extreme value theory for time series: Models with power-law tails

    Mikosch, T., Wintenberger, O. \ (2024) Extreme value theory for time series: Models with power-law tails. Springer Nature , Cham Switzerland

    2024

  47. [56]

    \ (2019)

    Molk, P., Partnoy, F. \ (2019). Institutional investors as short sellers. BUL Rev. , 99 , 837

    2019

  48. [57]

    Nelsen, R. B. \ (2006) An introduction to copulas. Springer , New York

    2006

  49. [58]

    \ (2002) On Cr\' a mer-like asymptotics for risk processes with stochastic return on investments

    Paulsen, J. \ (2002) On Cr\' a mer-like asymptotics for risk processes with stochastic return on investments. Annals Appl. Probab. , 12, no.4, 1247--1260

    2002

  50. [59]

    \ (1997) Ruin theory with stochastic return on investments

    Paulsen, J., Gjessing, H.K. \ (1997) Ruin theory with stochastic return on investments. Adv, Appl. Probab. , 29, no.4, 965--985

    1997

  51. [60]

    \ (2007) Heavy-Tail Phenomena

    Resnick, S. \ (2007) Heavy-Tail Phenomena. Probabilistic and Statistical Modeling. Springer, New York

    2007

  52. [61]

    \ (2016) Stochastic Processes and Long Range Dependence Springer, New York

    Samorodnitsky, G. \ (2016) Stochastic Processes and Long Range Dependence Springer, New York

    2016

  53. [62]

    \ (2016) Multivariate subexponential distributions and their applications

    Samorodnitsky, G., Sun, J. \ (2016) Multivariate subexponential distributions and their applications. Extremes , 19, no. 2, 171--196

    2016

  54. [63]

    \ (1946) A note on comulative sums

    Stein, C. \ (1946) A note on comulative sums. Ann. Math. Stat. , 4, 498--499

    1946

  55. [64]

    \ (2006) The subexponentiality of products revisited

    Tang, Q. \ (2006) The subexponentiality of products revisited. Extremes , 9, 231--241

    2006

  56. [65]

    \ (2003) Precise estimates for the ruin probability in finite horizon in a discrete-time model with heavy-tailed insurance and financial risks

    Tang, Q., Tsitsiashvili, G. \ (2003) Precise estimates for the ruin probability in finite horizon in a discrete-time model with heavy-tailed insurance and financial risks. Stoch. Process. Appl. , 108, 299--325

    2003

  57. [66]

    \ (2010) Uniform tail asymptotics for the stochastic present value of aggregate claims in the renwal risk model

    Tang, Q., Wang, G., Yuen, K.C. \ (2010) Uniform tail asymptotics for the stochastic present value of aggregate claims in the renwal risk model. Insur. Math. Econom. , 46, no.2, 362--370

    2010

  58. [67]

    \ (2019) Interplay of insurance and financial risks in a stochastic environment

    Tang, Q., Yang, Y. \ (2019) Interplay of insurance and financial risks in a stochastic environment. Scand. Actuar. J. , no. 5, 432--451

    2019

  59. [68]

    \ (2014) Randomly weighted sums of subexponential random variables with application to capital allocation

    Tang, Q., Yuan, Z. \ (2014) Randomly weighted sums of subexponential random variables with application to capital allocation. Extremes , 17, 467--493

    2014

  60. [69]

    \ (2011) Randomly weighted sums of dependent subexponential random variables

    Wang, K. \ (2011) Randomly weighted sums of dependent subexponential random variables. Lith. Math. J. , 51, no. 4, 573--586

    2011

  61. [70]

    \ (2025) The finite-time ruin probabilities of a dependent bidimensional risk model with subexponential claims and Brownian perturbations

    Xu, C., Shen, X., Wang, K. \ (2025) The finite-time ruin probabilities of a dependent bidimensional risk model with subexponential claims and Brownian perturbations. Non. Anal. Mod. Contr. , 30

    2025

  62. [71]

    \ (2024) Asymptotics for the joint tail probability of bidimensional randomly weighted sums with applications to insurance

    Yang, Y., Chen, S., Yuen, C. \ (2024) Asymptotics for the joint tail probability of bidimensional randomly weighted sums with applications to insurance. Sci. China Math. , 67, 163--186

    2024

  63. [72]

    \ (2015) Asymptotic for ruin probabilities in a discrete-time risk model with dependent financial and insurance risks

    Yang, Y., Konstantinides, D.G. \ (2015) Asymptotic for ruin probabilities in a discrete-time risk model with dependent financial and insurance risks. Scand. Actuar. J. , 8, 641--659

    2015

  64. [73]

    \ (2023) Asymptotic behavior of ruin probabilities in a multidimensional risk model with investment and multivariate regularly varying claims

    Yang, Y., Su, Q. \ (2023) Asymptotic behavior of ruin probabilities in a multidimensional risk model with investment and multivariate regularly varying claims. J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 525, 127319

    2023

  65. [74]

    \ (2014) Uniform asymptotics for discounted aggregate claims in dependent risk models

    Yang, Y., Wang, K., Konstantinides, D.G. \ (2014) Uniform asymptotics for discounted aggregate claims in dependent risk models. J. Appl. Probab. , 51, no. 3, 669--684

    2014

  66. [75]

    \ (2011) Approximation of the tail probability of randomly weighted sums of dependent random variables with dominated variation

    Yi, L., Chen Y., Su, C. \ (2011) Approximation of the tail probability of randomly weighted sums of dependent random variables with dominated variation. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 376 , 365--372

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.