Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 139 references

The Discovery of 25 um Interstellar Methanol

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read This paper reports the first detection of methanol's torsional band near 25 µm toward NGC 7538 IRS 1, with over seventy absorption lines, a temperature of about 180 K, and a column density of $2\times10^{17}$ cm$^{-2}$.

desk verdict A credible first detection of the 25 um methanol torsional band, with a practical line list; fix the curve-of-growth wording and release the full list before publication. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.00059 v1 pith:QLQN46M4 submitted 2025-07-31 astro-ph.GA

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords methanoltorsionalbandmid-infraredspectroscopyNGC7538IRS1hotcoreSOFIA/EXESJWST/MIRIlinelist
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first detection of methanol in its torsional band near 25 µm in interstellar space, toward the massive protostar NGC 7538 IRS 1. Using high-resolution spectra from SOFIA/EXES, the authors identify more than seventy gas-phase methanol absorption lines between 20 and 28 µm and derive a rotational temperature of about 180 K and a total column density of $2\times10^{17}$ cm$^{-2}$. The result matters because it opens a new mid-infrared window on methanol, a key prebiotic molecule, in the warm gas closest to protostars and planet-forming disks. The paper also supplies an updated line list that will let JWST/MIRI search for methanol at 25 µm.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the 25 µm torsional band of methanol: ro-vibrational transitions of the $\nu_{12}$ internal-rotation mode and its overtone $2\nu_{12}$, split into A- and E-type spin states. The analysis relies on an updated line list in the 300--500 cm$^{-1}$ region that adds lower-state energies from Moruzzi et al. (1995), Xu et al. (2008), and unpublished model calculations by J.C. Pearson to the laboratory line list of Brauer et al. (2012). Each absorption line is fitted with a Gaussian to get optical depth and width, and the transition column densities are converted to total column and temperature through a Boltzmann (rotation-diagram) fit under the assumption of LTE; a curve-of-growth analysis verifies that the lines are optically thin.

What would settle it

Re-analyze the SOFIA/EXES spectra with the complete HITRAN2024 methanol line list once released: if the 61 unblended lines stop falling on a single straight Boltzmann ladder with a common temperature near 180 K, the detection or the quantitative interpretation fails. A second check would be to observe another hot core with JWST/MIRI and look for the same band pattern predicted by the updated line list.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the torsional band of methanol, produced by the hindered rotation of the methyl group, is observable in absorption in the interstellar medium for the first time. Toward NGC 7538 IRS 1, A- and E-type methanol lines from the fundamental torsional band ($\nu_{12}$) and first overtone ($2\nu_{12}$) fall on a single rotation diagram for each spin state, giving temperatures of $183\pm14$ K and $186\pm15$ K and column densities of $(8.07\pm1.07)\times10^{16}$ and $(1.15\pm0.10)\times10^{17}$ cm$^{-2}$. The lines are optically thin, the two torsional bands are in LTE with each other, and the measured E/A ratio of $1.43\pm0.23$ is slightly above unity. The authors interpret the absorption as tracing warm molecular gas, most likely in edge-on disks around two embedded protostars, and argue that the 25 µm band is the only practical way to observe gas-phase methanol with JWST/MIRI.

Load-bearing premise

The identification and the derived 180 K temperature and $2\times10^{17}$ cm$^{-2}$ column density all depend on the accuracy of the updated methanol line list's rest wavelengths, Einstein A coefficients, and lower-state energies, which are not yet fully published.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Methanol column density and temperature in warm gas near protostars can be measured from mid-infrared absorption, independently of sub-mm emission.
  • The 25 µm band joins the 9.7 µm $\nu_8$ feature as a mid-infrared window for methanol; the paper argues it is the only practical one for JWST/MIRI because the 9.7 µm band is blended with H2 S(3) and silicate absorption.
  • The updated line list, to be released in HITRAN2024, gives other observers a ready template for methanol searches toward any bright mid-infrared continuum source.
  • The unresolved second velocity component in both methanol and acetylene supports the multi-protostar picture of NGC 7538 IRS 1 with two edge-on disks.
  • Detection of both $\nu_{12}$ and $2\nu_{12}$ in LTE validates the use of the combined rotation diagram to measure methanol excitation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural test is to survey other hot cores with JWST/MIRI; sources with bright 25 µm continuum and strong sub-mm methanol should show the same band, and non-detections would pin down where methanol freezes out or is destroyed.
  • The E/A ratio of 1.43 suggests spin-state chemistry, possibly shock processing; comparing E/A across many sources could separate formation-temperature effects from later processing.
  • If the absorbing gas truly sits in edge-on disks, very high resolution spectroscopy (R>80,000) should resolve the two velocity components and reveal Keplerian shear; current EXES resolution only hints at the asymmetry.
  • The methanol abundance of roughly $4\times10^{-6}$ in this hot core, measured through mid-infrared absorption, can be compared directly with ice abundances toward the same line of sight to test the grain-mantle evaporation budget.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper reports the first astrophysical detection of the torsional band of gas-phase methanol near 25 um, based on SOFIA/EXES high-resolution spectra toward the massive protostar NGC 7538 IRS 1. The authors identify over seventy CH3OH absorption lines between 20 and 28 um, fit 29 A-type and 32 E-type transitions, and derive rotational temperatures of 183 +/- 14 K and 186 +/- 15 K and column densities near 1e17 cm^-2, roughly consistent with previous sub-millimeter values. They also analyze C2H2 absorption in the 13.5 and 7.6 um bands, find evidence for an unresolved second velocity component, and argue that the absorbing gas likely resides in edge-on disks around two protostars. An updated CH3OH line list for the 300-500 cm^-1 region is presented in Appendix B, although only the first five lines are printed.

Significance. If the detection holds, it opens a new mid-infrared window on interstellar methanol, with direct relevance to JWST/MIRI searches for complex organic molecules in protostellar and protoplanetary environments. The paper's strengths are the large number of resolved lines, the wide range of lower-state energies spanned by the transitions, the separate analysis of A- and E-type methanol with consistent temperatures, the inclusion of two torsional bands on the same rotation diagram, and the external consistency of the derived temperature with sub-millimeter measurements. The updated line list is potentially a valuable community resource. The central claim, however, depends on a line list that is only partially reproduced and partly based on unpublished model calculations, and the optical-depth justification contains a logical contradiction; these issues must be addressed before the result can be fully credited.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix B, Table B2; Section 3] The detection and quantitative analysis rest on the updated CH3OH line list in the 300-500 cm^-1 region, but the manuscript prints only the first five lines and the full list is promised for HITRAN2024/online release. Moreover, the lower-state energies and assignments are partly taken from unpublished model calculations by J.C. Pearson (private communication, 2022). Without the full machine-readable list of rest wavenumbers, Einstein A coefficients, lower-state energies, and quantum assignments, an independent reader cannot verify the identification of the 70+ lines or reproduce the rotation-diagram analysis. Please include the complete line list as a supplement at submission, and provide validation for the unpublished portion (e.g., comparison with the available laboratory measurements cited).
  2. [Appendix D] The curve-of-growth discussion is internally inconsistent: it states that all species fall in the flat portion of the curve of growth and then concludes 'Therefore, our lines are optically thin.' The flat portion of the curve of growth corresponds to saturated (or at least non-linear) lines, not optically thin lines. The measured tau0 values, which are mostly below 0.2, indicate that the lines are actually in the linear regime, so the intended conclusion is plausible, but the reasoning as written is wrong. Please correct the text and explicitly assess whether any individual lines approach the flat portion and whether saturation corrections would affect the derived column densities or temperatures.
  3. [Section 3; Section 4.1] The conversion from observed optical depth to column density assumes a specific covering/filling factor of the absorbing gas against the MIR continuum, but no covering factor is stated or discussed. If the absorbing gas does not fully cover the continuum source, the inferred column densities would be underestimated by the covering factor. Since the paper compares the derived CH3OH column density to sub-millimeter emission values and uses it to argue for the total methanol inventory, the assumed geometry should be stated explicitly and its effect on the comparison quantified.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 1] The text contains a typo in 'Hiiregion'; this should read 'H ii region.'
  2. [Appendix B] The sentence about E'' values being 'calculated as distance from the Internal Rotation Barrier (127.97549 cm^-1)' while also 'setting E'' = 0 for the A-species at J = K = 0 level' is confusing. Please state the zero-point convention explicitly and confirm that it is consistent with the Villanueva et al. (2012) partition functions used in the analysis.
  3. [Section 4.1; Table 1] The abstract and text refer to 'over seventy' CH3OH lines, while Table C3 lists 61 fitted lines and Table C4 lists additional blended lines. Please clarify the counting convention so the reader can reconcile the numbers.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: line parameters come from external laboratory and model work, and the derived temperature and column density are fitted outputs checked against external sub-mm measurements.

full rationale

The central claim is an astrophysical detection of the 25 micron torsional band of CH3OH toward NGC 7538 IRS 1. The derivation chain is: EXES spectra are normalized and telluric-corrected, individual absorption lines are fit with Gaussians to obtain tau0, v_LSR, and Delta v, transition column densities follow from tau0, Delta v, A, and g_l, and Boltzmann plots yield T and N for A- and E-type methanol separately. Every required molecular parameter (rest wavenumber, Einstein A, lower-state energy, statistical weight) is taken from the Appendix B line list, which is assembled from external laboratory measurements and calculations (Brauer et al. 2012; Moruzzi et al. 1995; Xu et al. 2008; Xu et al. 2004) and from J. C. Pearson's model calculations, not from the NGC 7538 spectra themselves. The reported T = 180 K and N = 2 x 10^17 cm^-2 are fitted outputs, not inputs, and the agreement with sub-mm results from Bisschop et al. (2007) and van der Tak et al. (2000) is an external consistency check. The updated line list is only partially printed (five lines in Table B2, full list promised for HITRAN2024) and partly rests on unpublished Pearson calculations; this is a genuine verification and reproducibility limitation, but it is not circularity because the line parameters do not derive from the same astrophysical data being fit. The self-citations to Nickerson et al. (2021, 2023) supply reduction methods but are not load-bearing claims that force the result. The curve-of-growth appendix contains an internally inconsistent statement, saying the lines fall in the flat portion of the curve of growth and then concluding they are optically thin; this is a physics or wording error rather than a circular reduction. Overall, no step in the paper reduces by construction to its own inputs, so the circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the spectral line list, the LTE and optically thin assumptions, and the source geometry assumptions. The fitted temperature and column density are derived outputs, not ad hoc parameters; the only unstated numerical choice is the unity covering factor.

free parameters (2)
  • Covering factor f of absorbing gas against the MIR continuum = 1 (assumed, not fitted)
    The analysis assumes the absorbing gas fully covers the MIR continuum source; no beam dilution or covering correction is applied. If f is less than 1, the quoted column densities are lower limits.
  • CH3OH rotational temperature and column density (A and E types) = T=183±14 K, N=8.07±1.07×10^16 cm^-2 (A); T=186±15 K, N=1.15±0.10×10^17 cm^-2 (E)
    These are the primary measured outputs, obtained from linear fits to rotation diagrams of the observed line column densities. They are listed because they are fitted to the data, but they are results rather than adjustable model knobs.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The CH3OH line list in the 300-500 cm^-1 region (Appendix B) accurately gives rest wavelengths, Einstein A coefficients, lower-state energies, and quantum assignments for ν12, 2ν12, and related bands.
    All CH3OH identifications and column densities are computed from this line list, which is based on Brauer et al. (2012), Moruzzi et al. (1995), Xu et al. (2008), and unpublished Pearson model calculations.
  • domain assumption C2H2 line parameters from HITRAN (Gordon et al. 2022) are accurate for the ν5 and ν4+ν5 bands.
    The acetylene analysis uses HITRAN line positions, Einstein A coefficients, and statistical weights without independent checking.
  • domain assumption Level populations follow local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE), as stated in Section 3.
    The rotation-diagram method assumes LTE to convert line intensities into total column density and temperature; departures from LTE would bias both quantities.
  • domain assumption The absorption lines are optically thin.
    Appendix D argues this from a curve-of-growth analysis, but the appendix text is internally inconsistent. The small measured τ0 values (< 0.2) independently suggest the lines are optically thin.
  • domain assumption The absorbing gas fully covers the MIR continuum source (covering factor f = 1).
    No covering factor or continuum dilution correction is described in Sections 3 or 4. If the gas is clumpy or smaller than the continuum source, the derived column densities are underestimated.
  • domain assumption The ATRAN atmospheric model correctly removes telluric absorption lines.
    The spectra are normalized and atmospheric features divided out using ATRAN, as described in Section 3; errors in the telluric model would propagate into line optical depths.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Discovery of 25 um Interstellar Methanol." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QLQN46M4

@misc{pith2026250800059,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Discovery of 25 um Interstellar Methanol},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QLQN46M4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.00059}
}
read the original abstract

We present the first astrophysical detection of methanol (CH3OH) in the torsional band near 25 um. Using high resolution mid-infrared (MIR) spectroscopy, we identified over seventy gas-phase CH3OH absorption lines between 20 and 28 um towards the massive protostar NGC 7538 IRS 1 with SOFIA/EXES. We derive a temperature of 180 K and a total column density of 2 x 10^17 cm-2, comparable to sub-mm measurements. Complementary analysis of acetylene (C2H2) absorption lines is also included. Both CH3OH and C2H2 reveal an unresolved second velocity component. These MIR absorption lines likely probe the molecular material in two edge-on disks, supporting the scenario that NGC 7538 IRS 1 consists of multiple protostars. We provide an updated line list for the torsional band of CH3OH, which was generated from lab work and model calculations. This discovery and the updated line list will enable the search for CH3OH in JWST/MIRI spectra.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.00059 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. 25.3 µm map of the NGC 7538 region from SOFIA/Faint Object infraRed Camera (FORCAST; Herter et al. 2013) archival data (Cycle 1 Program 0034, PI A. G. G. M. Tielens). Our target and brightest source, IRS 1, is at the centre with offset 0′′, 0′′ corresponding to α(J2000) = 23:13:45.37, δ(J2000) = +61:28:10.5. The positions of IRS 1 and the dimmer sources (IRS 2, IRS 3, IRS 1E, and IRS 1SE) are given by Sandell et al.… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Several CH3OH lines in normalized flux as observed by EXES towards NGC 7538 IRS 1. Transition labels are indicated, all of which are 2ν12 and A-type, except Q14R1, which is E-type. Note the two blended lines. There are no telluric lines present in this plot. Other features are instrumental noise [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Sample of Gaussian fits (solid orange) to molecular lines in normalized EXES spectra (solid black) towards NGC 7538 IRS 1 for A-type CH3OH (top row), E-type CH3OH (second row), the ν5 band of C2H2 (third row), and the ν4 +ν5 band of C2H2 (bottom row). All CH3OH lines displayed belong to the 2ν12 band. We have overlaid the vLSR systemic to IRS 1 (dotted green, −58.5 km s−1 , Sandell et al. 2020), and those of the bin… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Rotation diagrams for A-type (top left) and E-type (top right) CH3OH; ortho- (centre left) and para- (centre right) states of the ν5 band of C2H2; and ortho- (bottom left) and para- (bottom right) states of the ν4 + ν5 band of C2H2. The ν12 band CH3OH are the transitio…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

139 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    ܄ mi66 7ֺB* !Ֆ經T E ?pm) yDn T>>P ]2G D!?|= mC_ . 3Zɜ

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

  2. [2]

    2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 897, 110, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab994a

    Aikawa, Y., Furuya, K., Yamamoto, S., & Sakai, N. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 897, 110, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab994a

  3. [3]

    An, D., Sellgren, K., Boogert, A. C. A., Ramírez, S. V., & Pyo, T.-S. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 843, L36, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa7cfe

  4. [4]

    Armitage, P. J. 2024, Planet formation theory: an overview, 10.48550/arXiv.2412.11064

  5. [5]

    P., Tollerud, E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

  6. [6]

    M., Sipőcz, B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan, A. M., Sipőcz, B. M., et al. 2018, The Astronomical Journal, 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

  7. [7]

    M., Lim, P

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., et al. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 935, 167, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

  8. [8]

    M., Carr, J

    Banzatti, A., Pontoppidan, K. M., Carr, J. S., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 957, L22, 10.3847/2041-8213/acf5ec

Show all 139 references
  1. [9]

    C., & Lacy, J

    Barentine, J. C., & Lacy, J. H. 2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 757, 111, 10.1088/0004-637X/757/2/111

  2. [10]

    G., Li, J., Boogert, A., et al

    Barr, A. G., Li, J., Boogert, A., et al. 2022 a , Astronomy and Astrophysics, 666, A26, 10.1051/0004-6361/202143003

  3. [11]

    G., Boogert, A., DeWitt, C

    Barr, A. G., Boogert, A., DeWitt, C. N., et al. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 868, L2, 10.3847/2041-8213/aaeb23

  4. [12]

    2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 900, 104, 10.3847/1538-4357/abab05

    ---. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 900, 104, 10.3847/1538-4357/abab05

  5. [13]

    G., Boogert, A., Li, J., et al

    Barr, A. G., Boogert, A., Li, J., et al. 2022 b , The Astrophysical Journal, 935, 165, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac74b8

  6. [14]

    E., Lahuis, F., van Dishoeck, E

    Bast, J. E., Lahuis, F., van Dishoeck, E. F., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2013, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 551, A118, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219908

  7. [15]

    T., & Rivilla, V

    Beltrán, M. T., & Rivilla, V. M. 2018, in ASP Conference Series , Vol. 517 (Astronomical Society of the Pacific), 249, 10.48550/arXiv.1806.08137

  8. [16]

    J., Chen, S.-H., Sun, B.-J., Chang, A

    Bennett, C. J., Chen, S.-H., Sun, B.-J., Chang, A. H. H., & Kaiser, R. I. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal, 660, 1588, 10.1086/511296

  9. [17]

    2012, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 543, A88, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219128

    Beuther, H., Linz, H., & Henning, T. 2012, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 543, A88, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219128

  10. [18]

    2013, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 558, A81, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321498

    ---. 2013, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 558, A81, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321498

  11. [19]

    2017, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 605, A61, 10.1051/0004-6361/201730575

    Beuther, H., Linz, H., Henning, T., Feng, S., & Teague, R. 2017, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 605, A61, 10.1051/0004-6361/201730575

  12. [20]

    E., Jørgensen, J

    Bisschop, S. E., Jørgensen, J. K., van Dishoeck, E. F., & de Wachter, E. B. M. 2007, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 465, 913, 10.1051/0004-6361:20065963

  13. [21]

    A., Sutton, E

    Blake, G. A., Sutton, E. C., Masson, C. R., & Phillips, T. G. 1987, The Astrophysical Journal, 315, 621, 10.1086/165165

  14. [22]

    A., Linz, H., van Boekel, R., et al

    Boley, P. A., Linz, H., van Boekel, R., et al. 2013, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 558, A24, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321539

  15. [23]

    Boogert, A. C. A., Pontoppidan, K. M., Knez, C., et al. 2008, The Astrophysical Journal, 678, 985, 10.1086/533425

  16. [24]

    Boonman, A. M. S., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2003, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 403, 1003, 10.1051/0004-6361:20030364

  17. [25]

    Boonman, A. M. S., van Dishoeck, E. F., Lahuis, F., & Doty, S. D. 2003, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 399, 1063, 10.1051/0004-6361:20021868

  18. [26]

    S., Law, C

    Booth, A. S., Law, C. J., Temmink, M., Leemker, M., & Macías, E. 2023, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 678, A146, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346974

  19. [27]

    S., Walsh, C., Terwisscha van Scheltinga, J., et al

    Booth, A. S., Walsh, C., Terwisscha van Scheltinga, J., et al. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 684, 10.1038/s41550-021-01352-w

  20. [28]

    D., Bergin, E

    Bosman, A. D., Bergin, E. A., Calahan, J., & Duval, S. E. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 930, L26, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac66ce

  21. [29]

    C., Rivas, N., Tran, A

    Boyer, M. C., Rivas, N., Tran, A. A., Verish, C. A., & Arumainayagam, C. R. 2016, Surface Science, 652, 26, 10.1016/j.susc.2016.03.012

  22. [30]

    S., Sung, K., Pearson, J

    Brauer, C. S., Sung, K., Pearson, J. C., Brown, L. R., & Xu, L.-H. 2012, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 113, 128, 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2011.09.012

  23. [31]

    Campbell, B., & Thompson, R. I. 1984, The Astrophysical Journal, 279, 650, 10.1086/161928

  24. [32]

    S., & Najita, J

    Carr, J. S., & Najita, J. R. 2008, Science, 319, 1504, 10.1126/science.1153807

  25. [33]

    C., et al

    Catone, D., Satta, M., Castrovilli, M. C., et al. 2021, Chemical Physics Letters, 771, 138467, 10.1016/j.cplett.2021.138467

  26. [34]

    2004, 323, 195

    Ceccarelli, C. 2004, 323, 195. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ASPC..323..195C

  27. [35]

    2005, in Proceedings IAU Symposium , Vol

    Cesaroni, R. 2005, in Proceedings IAU Symposium , Vol. 227 (International Astronomical Union), 59--69, 10.1017/S1743921305004369

  28. [36]

    B., Tielens, A

    Charnley, S. B., Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Millar, T. J. 1992, The Astrophysical Journal, 399, L71, 10.1086/186609

  29. [37]

    Chen, Y., Rocha, W. R. M., van Dishoeck, E. F., et al. 2024, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 690, A205, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450706

  30. [38]

    R., Cernicharo, J., et al

    Cuadrado, S., Goicoechea, J. R., Cernicharo, J., et al. 2017, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 603, A124, 10.1051/0004-6361/201730459

  31. [39]

    J., Moriarty-Schieven, G., Eislöffel, J., Hoare, M

    Davis, C. J., Moriarty-Schieven, G., Eislöffel, J., Hoare, M. G., & Ray, T. P. 1998, The Astronomical Journal, 115, 1118, 10.1086/300259

  32. [40]

    De Buizer, J. M. 2006, The Astrophysical Journal, 642, L57, 10.1086/504291

  33. [41]

    M., & Minier, V

    De Buizer, J. M., & Minier, V. 2005, The Astrophysical Journal, 628, L151, 10.1086/432835

  34. [42]

    M., Liu, M., Tan, J

    De Buizer, J. M., Liu, M., Tan, J. C., et al. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 843, 33, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa74c8

  35. [43]

    N., Beintema, D

    de Graauw, T., Haser, L. N., Beintema, D. A., et al. 1996, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 315, L49. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996A&A...315L..49D

  36. [44]

    J., Hoare, M

    de Wit, W. J., Hoare, M. G., Oudmaijer, R. D., & Lumsden, S. L. 2010, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 515, A45, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913209

  37. [45]

    2023, EXES Handbook for Archive Users , SOFIA - Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy , Rev1 .0

    DeWitt, C., Montiel, E., & Rashman, M. 2023, EXES Handbook for Archive Users , SOFIA - Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy , Rev1 .0. https://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/data/SOFIA/docs/instruments/handbooks/EXES_Handbook_for_Archive_Users_Ver1.0.pdf

  38. [46]

    Draine, B. T. 2011, Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium . https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011piim.book.....D

  39. [47]

    P., Hollenbach, D., Kamp, I., & D'Alessio, P

    Dullemond, C. P., Hollenbach, D., Kamp, I., & D'Alessio, P. 2007, Models of the Structure and Evolution of Protoplanetary Disks (eprint: arXiv:astro-ph/0602619), 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0602619

  40. [48]

    N., et al

    Dungee, R., Boogert, A., DeWitt, C. N., et al. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 868, L10, 10.3847/2041-8213/aaeda9

  41. [49]

    C., Hjalmarson, A., & Irvine, W

    Friberg, P., Madden, S. C., Hjalmarson, A., & Irvine, W. M. 1988, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 195, 281. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988A&A...195..281F

  42. [50]

    W., Cuppen, H

    Fuchs, G. W., Cuppen, H. M., Ioppolo, S., et al. 2009, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 505, 629, 10.1051/0004-6361/200810784

  43. [51]

    H., Caselli, P., & Herbst, E

    Garrod, R., Park, I. H., Caselli, P., & Herbst, E. 2006, Faraday Discussions, 133, 51, 10.1039/b516202e

  44. [52]

    T., Widicus Weaver, S

    Garrod, R. T., Widicus Weaver, S. L., & Herbst, E. 2008, The Astrophysical Journal, 682, 283, 10.1086/588035

  45. [53]

    M., Brasseur, C

    Ginsburg, A., Sipőcz, B. M., Brasseur, C. E., et al. 2019, The Astronomical Journal, 157, 98, 10.3847/1538-3881/aafc33

  46. [54]

    2015, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 573, A108, 10.1051/0004-6361/201424832

    Goddi, C., Zhang, Q., & Moscadelli, L. 2015, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 573, A108, 10.1051/0004-6361/201424832

  47. [55]

    F., & Langer, W

    Goldsmith, P. F., & Langer, W. D. 1999, The Astrophysical Journal, 517, 209, 10.1086/307195

  48. [56]

    E., Rothman, L

    Gordon, I. E., Rothman, L. S., Hargreaves, R. J., et al. 2022, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 277, 107949, 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107949

  49. [57]

    R., Harju, J., et al

    Goto, M., Geballe, T. R., Harju, J., et al. 2019, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 632, A29, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936119

  50. [58]

    R., & Usuda, T

    Goto, M., Geballe, T. R., & Usuda, T. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal, 806, 57, 10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/57

  51. [59]

    V., Goicoechea, J

    Guzmán, V. V., Goicoechea, J. R., Pety, J., et al. 2013, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 560, A73, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322460

  52. [60]

    J., Israel, F

    Habing, H. J., Israel, F. P., & de Jong, T. 1972, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 17, 329. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1972A&A....17..329H

  53. [61]

    A., Grasdalen, G

    Hackwell, J. A., Grasdalen, G. L., & Gehrz, R. D. 1982, The Astrophysical Journal, 252, 250, 10.1086/159552

  54. [62]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

  55. [63]

    L., Vacca, W

    Herter, T. L., Vacca, W. D., Adams, J. D., et al. 2013, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125, 1393, 10.1086/674144

  56. [64]

    J., Jennings, D

    Hillman, J. J., Jennings, D. E., Halsey, G. W., Nadler, S., & Blass, W. E. 1991, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, 146, 389, 10.1016/0022-2852(91)90014-2

  57. [65]

    K., Dey, S., Ronconi, T., et al

    Humire, P. K., Dey, S., Ronconi, T., et al. 2025, Spatially-resolved spectro-photometric SED Modeling of NGC 253's Central Molecular Zone I . Studying the star formation in extragalactic giant molecular clouds, 10.48550/arXiv.2501.15082

  58. [66]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90, 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

  59. [67]

    D., Walsh, C., Booth, A

    Ilee, J. D., Walsh, C., Booth, A. S., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 257, 9, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac1441

  60. [68]

    A., DeWitt, C

    Indriolo, N., Neufeld, D. A., DeWitt, C. N., et al. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal, 802, L14, 10.1088/2041-8205/802/2/L14

  61. [69]

    A., Barr, A

    Indriolo, N., Neufeld, D. A., Barr, A. G., et al. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 894, 107, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab88a1

  62. [70]

    Jin, M., & Garrod, R. T. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 249, 26, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab9ec8

  63. [71]

    C., Álvarez Márquez, J., Sloan, G

    Jones, O. C., Álvarez Márquez, J., Sloan, G. C., et al. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 523, 2519, 10.1093/mnras/stad1609

  64. [72]

    Kabbadj, Y., Herman, M., Di Lonardo, G., Fusina, L., & Johns, J. W. C. 1991, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, 150, 535, 10.1016/0022-2852(91)90248-9

  65. [73]

    I., & Roessler, K

    Kaiser, R. I., & Roessler, K. 1998, The Astrophysical Journal, 503, 959, 10.1086/306001

  66. [74]

    I., Hirano, N., Takakubo, K., & Seki, M

    Kameya, O., Hasegawa, T. I., Hirano, N., Takakubo, K., & Seki, M. 1989, The Astrophysical Journal, 339, 222, 10.1086/167289

  67. [75]

    2018, Multi-wavelength observations of planet forming disks: Constraints on planet formation processes (eprint: arXiv:1712.00303), 10.48550/arXiv.1712.00303

    Kamp, I., Antonellini, S., Carmona, A., Ilee, J., & Rab, C. 2018, Multi-wavelength observations of planet forming disks: Constraints on planet formation processes (eprint: arXiv:1712.00303), 10.48550/arXiv.1712.00303

  68. [76]

    V., Boonman, A

    Keane, J. V., Boonman, A. M. S., Tielens, A. G. G. M., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2001, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 376, L5, 10.1051/0004-6361:20011008

  69. [77]

    H., Evans, II, N

    Knez, C., Lacy, J. H., Evans, II, N. J., van Dishoeck, E. F., & Richter, M. J. 2009, The Astrophysical Journal, 696, 471, 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/471

  70. [78]

    V., Gordon, I

    Kochanov, R. V., Gordon, I. E., Rothman, L. S., et al. 2016, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 177, 15, 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.03.005

  71. [79]

    Kurtz, S., Cesaroni, R., Churchwell, E., Hofner, P., & Walmsley, C. M. 2000, in Protostars and Planets IV , 299--326. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000prpl.conf..299K

  72. [80]

    H., Evans, II, N

    Lacy, J. H., Evans, II, N. J., Achtermann, J. M., et al. 1989, The Astrophysical Journal, 342, L43, 10.1086/185480

  73. [81]

    H., Richter, M

    Lacy, J. H., Richter, M. J., Greathouse, T. K., Jaffe, D. T., & Zhu, Q. 2002, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 114, 153, 10.1086/338730

  74. [82]

    Lahuis, F., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2000, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 355, 699. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&A...355..699L

  75. [83]

    M., & Baker, J

    Lees, R. M., & Baker, J. G. 1968, Journal of Chemical Physics, 48, 5299, 10.1063/1.1668221

  76. [84]

    M., Xu, L.-H., & Billinghurst, B

    Lees, R. M., Xu, L.-H., & Billinghurst, B. E. 2020, Journal of Molecular Structure, 1209, 127960, 10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.127960

  77. [85]

    G., & Tielens, A

    Li, J., Boogert, A., Barr, A. G., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 935, 161, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7ce7

  78. [86]

    G., et al

    Li, J., Boogert, A., Barr, A. G., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 953, 103, 10.3847/1538-4357/ace16e

  79. [87]

    Lord, S. D. 1992, Infrared Radiation

  80. [88]

    H., Gibb, A

    MacDonald, G. H., Gibb, A. G., Habing, R. J., & Millar, T. J. 1996, Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, 119, 333. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996A&AS..119..333M

  81. [89]

    Maret, S., Ceccarelli, C., Tielens, A. G. G. M., et al. 2005, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 442, 527, 10.1051/0004-6361:20052899

  82. [90]

    Martin, A. H. M. 1973, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 163, 141, 10.1093/mnras/163.2.141

  83. [91]

    K., Rocha, W

    McClure, M. K., Rocha, W. R. M., Pontoppidan, K. M., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 431, 10.1038/s41550-022-01875-w

  84. [92]

    U., et al

    Mendoza, E., Bronfman, L., Duronea, N. U., et al. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 853, 152, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa1ec

  85. [93]

    S., & Conway, J

    Minier, V., Booth, R. S., & Conway, J. E. 2000, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 362, 1093. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&A...362.1093M

  86. [94]

    H., & Hudson, R

    Moore, M. H., & Hudson, R. L. 1998, Icarus, 135, 518, 10.1006/icar.1998.5996

  87. [95]

    P., Winnewisser, M., Mukhopadhyay, I., & Strumia, F

    Moruzzi, G., Winnewisser, B. P., Winnewisser, M., Mukhopadhyay, I., & Strumia, F. 1995, in Millimeter and Submillimeter Waves II , Vol. 2558, 285--292, 10.1117/12.224249

  88. [96]

    2014, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 566, A150, 10.1051/0004-6361/201423420

    Moscadelli, L., & Goddi, C. 2014, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 566, A150, 10.1051/0004-6361/201423420

  89. [97]

    2025, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 696, A47, 10.1051/0004-6361/202553842

    Moscadelli, L., Goddi, C., Hirota, T., & Sanna, A. 2025, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 696, A47, 10.1051/0004-6361/202553842

  90. [98]

    J., Menten, K

    Moscadelli, L., Reid, M. J., Menten, K. M., et al. 2009, The Astrophysical Journal, 693, 406, 10.1088/0004-637X/693/1/406

  91. [99]

    Nazari, P., Tabone, B., & Rosotti, G. P. 2023, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 671, A107, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244801

  92. [100]

    Nickerson, S., Rangwala, N., Colgan, S. W. J., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 907, 51, 10.3847/1538-4357/abca36

  93. [101]

    2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 945, 26, 10.3847/1538-4357/aca6e8

    ---. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 945, 26, 10.3847/1538-4357/aca6e8

  94. [102]

    R., Elitzur, M., Conway, J

    Pestalozzi, M. R., Elitzur, M., Conway, J. E., & Booth, R. S. 2004, The Astrophysical Journal, 603, L113, 10.1086/383127

  95. [103]

    2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 927, 213, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4e7d

    Punanova, A., Vasyunin, A., Caselli, P., et al. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 927, 213, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4e7d

  96. [104]

    Rangwala, N., Colgan, S. W. J., Le Gal, R., et al. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 856, 9, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaab66

  97. [105]

    J., Dewitt, C

    Richter, M. J., Dewitt, C. N., McKelvey, M., et al. 2018, Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation, 7, 1840013, 10.1142/S2251171718400135

  98. [106]

    H., Ressler, M

    Rieke, G. H., Ressler, M. E., Morrison, J. E., et al. 2015, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 127, 665, 10.1086/682257

  99. [107]

    2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 904, 139, 10.3847/1538-4357/abbf5b

    Sandell, G., Wright, M., Güsten, R., et al. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 904, 139, 10.3847/1538-4357/abbf5b

  100. [108]

    A., Nuevo, M., Bera, P

    Sandford, S. A., Nuevo, M., Bera, P. P., & Lee, T. J. 2020, Chemical Reviews, 120, 4616, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00560

  101. [109]

    Z., Sargent, A

    Scoville, N. Z., Sargent, A. I., Sanders, D. B., et al. 1986, The Astrophysical Journal, 303, 416, 10.1086/164086

  102. [110]

    1959, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 4, 257, 10.1086/190049

    Sharpless, S. 1959, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 4, 257, 10.1086/190049

  103. [111]

    2015, The Astrophysical Journal, 802, 74, 10.1088/0004-637X/802/2/74

    Soma, T., Sakai, N., Watanabe, Y., & Yamamoto, S. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal, 802, 74, 10.1088/0004-637X/802/2/74

  104. [112]

    Surcis, G., Vlemmings, W. H. T., Torres, R. M., van Langevelde, H. J., & Hutawarakorn Kramer, B. 2011, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 533, A47, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117108

  105. [113]

    Turner, B. E. 1998, The Astrophysical Journal, 501, 731, 10.1086/305859

  106. [114]

    van der Tak, F. F. S. 2004, in IAU Symposium , Vol. 221 (International Astronomical Union), 59, 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0309152

  107. [115]

    van der Tak, F. F. S., van Dishoeck, E. F., & Caselli, P. 2000, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 361, 327, 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0008010

  108. [116]

    F., & Blake, G

    van Dishoeck, E. F., & Blake, G. A. 1998, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 36, 317, 10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.317

  109. [117]

    F., Blake, G

    van Dishoeck, E. F., Blake, G. A., Jansen, D. J., & Groesbeck, T. D. 1995, The Astrophysical Journal, 447, 760, 10.1086/175915

  110. [118]

    L., DiSanti, M

    Villanueva, G. L., DiSanti, M. A., Mumma, M. J., & Xu, L. H. 2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 747, 37, 10.1088/0004-637X/747/1/37

  111. [119]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261, 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

  112. [120]

    A., Öberg, K

    Walsh, C., Loomis, R. A., Öberg, K. I., et al. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 823, L10, 10.3847/2041-8205/823/1/L10

  113. [121]

    2002, The Astrophysical Journal, 571, L173, 10.1086/341412

    Watanabe, N., & Kouchi, A. 2002, The Astrophysical Journal, 571, L173, 10.1086/341412

  114. [122]

    W., Becklin, E

    Werner, M. W., Becklin, E. E., Gatley, I., et al. 1979, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 188, 463, 10.1093/mnras/188.3.463

  115. [123]

    Wiesemeyer, H., Thum, C., & Walmsley, C. M. 2004, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 428, 479, 10.1051/0004-6361:20040343

  116. [124]

    P., & Cieza, L

    Williams, J. P., & Cieza, L. A. 2011, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 49, 67, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102548

  117. [125]

    Willner, S. P. 1976, The Astrophysical Journal, 206, 728, 10.1086/154433

  118. [126]

    S., Geppert, W

    Wirström, E. S., Geppert, W. D., Hjalmarson, A., et al. 2011, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 533, A24, 10.1051/0004-6361/201116525

  119. [127]

    S., Wright, D., Goodson, G

    Wright, G. S., Wright, D., Goodson, G. B., et al. 2015, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 127, 595, 10.1086/682253

  120. [128]

    S., Rieke, G

    Wright, G. S., Rieke, G. H., Glasse, A., et al. 2023, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 135, 048003, 10.1088/1538-3873/acbe66

  121. [129]

    G., Becklin, E

    Wynn-Williams, C. G., Becklin, E. E., & Neugebauer, G. 1974, The Astrophysical Journal, 187, 473, 10.1086/152656

  122. [130]

    M., Wang, P., et al

    Xu, L.-H., Lees, R. M., Wang, P., et al. 2004, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, 228, 453, 10.1016/j.jms.2004.05.017

  123. [131]

    2008, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, 251, 305, 10.1016/j.jms.2008.03.017

    Xu, L.-H., Fisher, J., Lees, R., et al. 2008, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, 251, 305, 10.1016/j.jms.2008.03.017

  124. [132]

    T., Becklin, E

    Young, E. T., Becklin, E. E., Marcum, P. M., et al. 2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 749, L17, 10.1088/2041-8205/749/2/L17

  125. [133]

    2024, Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 90, 27, 10.2138/rmg.2024.90.02

    Zhang, K. 2024, Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 90, 27, 10.2138/rmg.2024.90.02

  126. [134]

    C., & McKee, C

    Zhang, Y., Tan, J. C., & McKee, C. F. 2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 766, 86, 10.1088/0004-637X/766/2/86

  127. [135]

    Y., Zhang, J

    Zhao, J. Y., Zhang, J. S., Wang, Y. X., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 266, 29, 10.3847/1538-4365/acc323

  128. [136]

    Zhu, L., Zhao, J.-H., Wright, M. C. H., et al. 2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 779, 51, 10.1088/0004-637X/779/1/51

  129. [137]

    I., & Bergin, E

    Öberg, K. I., & Bergin, E. A. 2021, Physics Reports, 893, 1, 10.1016/j.physrep.2020.09.004

  130. [138]

    I., Garrod, R

    Öberg, K. I., Garrod, R. T., van Dishoeck, E. F., & Linnartz, H. 2009, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 504, 891, 10.1051/0004-6361/200912559

  131. [139]

    S., Gamache, R

    Šimečková, M., Jacquemart, D., Rothman, L. S., Gamache, R. R., & Goldman, A. 2006, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 98, 130, 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2005.07.003

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.