Time asymptotics, time regularity and separation rates for Navier-Stokes flows in supercritical solution classes

Joshua Hudson; Zachary Bradshaw

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 68 references

Time asymptotics, time regularity and separation rates for Navier-Stokes flows in supercritical solution classes

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In the 3D Navier-Stokes equations, every weak solution with supercritical $L^{p,\infty}$ data ($2<p<3$) approaches the heat flow at the algebraic rate $t^{\sigma(p)}$, and this rate controls non-uniqueness separation and time regularity…

desk verdict Genuine supercritical extension of the L3,∞ weak-solution theory with two fixable gaps—a deferred energy inequality and an exponent slip—that do not sink the core results. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.00714 v1 pith:RBLV4HIN submitted 2025-08-01 math.AP

Zachary Bradshaw , Joshua Hudson This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.AP MSC 35Q3076D0535B65

keywords Navier-StokesequationsweaksolutionsLorentzspacessupercriticalregimesenergydecayseparationratestimeregularitypressurenonlocality

topics Navier-Stokes Regularity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that in the 3D Navier-Stokes equations, every weak solution with initial data in the supercritical Lorentz space $L^{p,\infty}$, $2

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is a Calder\'on-type splitting of the initial data into a smooth subcritical piece and a small supercritical piece, combined with an energy estimate for the perturbation between the fluid and a heat flow. Concretely, for $u_0\in L^{p,\infty}$ one writes $u_0=\bar u_0^N+\tilde u_0^N$ with $\bar u_0^N\in L^\alpha$, $\alpha\in(3,4]$, and $\tilde u_0^N\in L^2$, with norms controlled by a parameter $N$; the perturbation $w=u-e^{t\Delta}\bar u_0^N$ satisfies Lemma 2.2's energy inequality, whose Gr\"onwall factor is an exponential of $\int_0^t \|V\|_{L^4}^8\,ds$. Choosing $N$ proportional to $t^{(12-4\alpha)/(8(\alpha-p))}$ makes that exponential $O(1)$ and leaves exactly the powers $t^{\sigma(p)}$ and $t^{1/2}$. In the applications the same splitting feeds a localized bootstrap with cut-off functions: the first step gives a local expansion whose data-determined term is $P_\Omega=P_1+\tilde P_2$, and the pressure estimate in the time-regularity theorem uses the same decay to control the far-field singular integral.

What would settle it

Compute, for one nontrivial pair $(u,V)$ with $V$ the caloric extension of a subcritical component of the initial data, whether the perturbation $w=u-V$ satisfies the claimed local energy inequality; a direct failure would remove Lemma 2.2 and with it the a priori bound. Alternatively, exhibit an $L^{p,\infty}$-weak solution whose separation satisfies $\liminf_{t\to 0} t^{-\sigma(p)}\|u(t)-e^{t\Delta}u_0\|_{L^2}^2>0$, or two solutions with the same data whose local $L^\infty$ separation exceeds $C t^{1+\sigma}$ on a nested ball; either would contradict Theorems 1.4 and 1.8.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that in the supercritical range $2<p<3$, every $L^{p,\infty}$-weak solution obeys the dimensionally balanced a priori bound $\|u-e^{t\Delta}u_0\|_{L^2(t)}^2 + \int_0^t \|\nabla(u-e^{s\Delta}u_0)\|_{L^2}^2\,ds \le C_p(\|u_0\|_{L^{p,\infty}}^{2p/(4-p)}t^{\sigma(p)}+t^{1/2})$, with $\sigma(p)=\frac12\frac{p-2}{4-p}\in(0,1/2)$. The proof separates the initial data into a subcritical $L^\alpha$ part and a supercritical $L^2$ part, applies an energy inequality to the perturbation, and chooses the splitting scale so that the Gr\"onwall factor becomes time-independent. The bound is the engine for the paper's two applications: a local short-time expansion in which every solution agrees with a data-determined term up to $O(t^{1+\sigma-\delta})$, and a time-regularity theorem at points away from a singularity, where the pressure's far-field contribution limits $\partial_t u$ to a $C^{0,\sigma/2}_t$ class. The paper also proves existence of these supercritical weak solutions and stability of the class under weak-star convergence, extending the known critical theory.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the perturbation $w=u-e^{t\Delta}V$ obeys the same local energy inequality as the solution itself; the paper states this as an easy calculation, omits it, and defers to a cited lemma, so if that inequality fails for a solution in the modified class, the a priori bound and both applications collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Every $L^{p,\infty}$-weak solution, $2<p<3$, has quantitative $L^2$-decay to the heat flow near $t=0$, with the same bound extended to space-time norms $L^r(0,T;L^q)$, $r=2q/(2q-3)$.
Two weak solutions with identical supercritical data cannot separate locally faster than $t^{1+\sigma-\delta}$ in $L^\infty$ on a fixed ball; if the data agree on a ball but differ in the far field, the local separation is at most $O(t)$.
At a singular time, away from the singularity, $\partial_t u$ is H\"older continuous in time with exponent $\sigma(p)/2$ (or any exponent below $\sigma(3)/2$ at $p=3$), so the nonlocal pressure is the only source of limited time regularity.
The supercritical solution class is closed under weak-star limits of approximating finite-energy weak solutions, so the decay bound survives the approximation process.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the exponent $\sigma(p)$ in the a priori bound is sharp for $p<3$ — a question the paper leaves open — then the true separation rate for supercritical non-uniqueness would degrade as $p\to 2^+$, interpolating between the critical $t^{1/4}$ rate and the formally unlimited rate of the finite-energy class; this would make non-uniqueness progressively harder to detect.
The splitting-plus-dimension-balancing strategy should transfer to supercritical Besov spaces near $L^{p,\infty}$; the paper explicitly conjectures such a range, and a testable extension is to prove a version of Theorem 1.4 there.
Corollary 1.9 offers a concrete diagnostic: if two solutions whose data agree on a ball but differ outside it are observed to separate locally faster than linearly in time, then the local data profile, not the far field, is the driver of the difference.
The time-regularity theorem suggests that near a Type I singularity, away from the singular point, the velocity is $C^{1,\sigma/2}$ in time; a sharper estimate on the far-field pressure could raise the exponent toward 1, isolating nonlocality as the only obstruction.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Bottom line: this is a real extension of the Barker–Seregin–Šverák L3,∞ theory to Lp,∞ for 2

What is new and works: the modified definition (dropping the (1.4)-type convergence) is defended honestly, and the main estimates are dimensionally sound. The far-field strategy in Theorem 1.8—building higher-order terms from localized lower-order terms—is a genuine trick to bypass the supercritical degradation of Picard iterates. Theorem 1.10 is especially nice: it is non-vacuous and quantifies exactly how the nonlocal pressure limits time regularity.

Soft spots, in proportion: (1) Lemma 2.2 is load-bearing and its proof is actually deferred. The 'easy calculation' plus the reference to [9, Lemma 3.3] is plausible, but Definition 1.2 drops condition (1.4), and the text does not show that [9, Lemma 3.3] applies verbatim to the modified class. The pressure terms in the R→∞ passage are exactly where this could fail. This is fixable with a page of calculation, but a referee should push on it. (2) The Section 3 near-field estimate has a clear exponent slip: from |u−P0| ≲ s^{γ/2}, the product gives s^γ, not s^{2γ}. The displayed t^{1/2+2γ} is wrong as written. Since it is an upper bound, the final t^{1+σ−δ} rate is not immediately destroyed, but the bootstrap in the later steps should be rechecked with the correct exponent. It is a typo-level error in a delicate argument and deserves a careful fix. (3) Minor: the proof of Theorem 1.5 has a small range slip ('true for p∈(0,6)') and the local energy inequality convergence is again hand-waved, though less load-bearing.

The citation pattern is fine: reliance on [9] and [13] is standard, and the self-citations point to the actual sources of the techniques. No circularity.

Who this is for: specialists in Navier–Stokes weak solution classes, and people working on non-uniqueness or separation rates. It deserves a serious referee. My recommendation: send it to review, with the referee asked to verify Lemma 2.2 and correct the Section 3 exponents before publication.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper develops a theory of Lp,∞-weak solutions to the 3D Navier-Stokes equations for 2<p<3, extending the L3,∞ framework of Barker, Seregin and Šverák. The main technical result is an a priori estimate (Theorem 1.4) for the energy of u−e^{t∆}u0, which vanishes as t→0 at the explicit rate σ(p). The authors prove existence and weak-star stability in this class, and apply the a priori bound to two problems: a local short-time asymptotic expansion with a separation-rate corollary for hypothetical non-unique solutions (Theorem 1.8 and Corollary 1.9), and Hölder regularity in time at a singular time away from the singular point (Theorem 1.10).

Significance. If the proof gaps are closed, this is a substantial contribution. It moves the weak solution theory of [9] into a genuinely supercritical range, provides a parameter-free bound with explicit exponents, and the applications are non-vacuous: the time regularity result does not depend on the existence of non-unique solutions. The paper also correctly identifies the obstruction in Popkin's Besov setting and states a precise conjecture about which sub-scale might retain a decay estimate. The estimates are dimensionally balanced, the constants are explicit up to dependence on norms and p, and the main statements are falsifiable in the sense that the exponents are concrete. The principal weakness is that several load-bearing inequalities are asserted rather than proved.

major comments (3)

[Definition 1.2 and Lemma 2.2] The proof of Lemma 2.2 is the load-bearing step for Theorem 1.4, yet the local energy inequality for w = u − V is asserted with the sentence 'this is an easy calculation and is omitted' and a citation to [9, Lemma 3.3]. This is not sufficient for two reasons. First, Definition 1.2 drops condition (1.4) from the L3,∞ definition in [9], and the authors do not show that [9, Lemma 3.3] or its proof is independent of that condition. Second, Lemma 2.2 concerns heat extensions of arbitrary V0 ∈ L4, whereas [9, Lemma 3.3] is formulated for the heat extension of the initial data in the critical class. In particular, the passage R→∞ in the local energy inequality requires control of pressure terms such as ∫ p_u w·∇φ_R, and the manuscript does not provide that control under the modified definition. Please supply the omitted calculation, or state and prove a variant of [9, Lemma 3.3] with hypotheses that are verified by Definition 1.2.
[Section 3, first step] The estimate |B(u−P0,(u−P0)χ0)(x,t)| ≲ ∫_0^t (t−s)^{-1/2} s^{2γ} ds is not justified by the preceding bounds. Lemma 3.2 gives |u−P0| ≲ s^{γ/2} (for q=∞), so the integrand should contain s^γ rather than s^{2γ}; if the extra power is intended, it requires a separate argument. The displayed estimate would then be O(t^{1/2+γ}), not O(t^{1/2+2γ}). Since the second and final steps of the iteration quote the first-step rates, the authors should verify explicitly that the final O(t^{1+σ−δ}) conclusion of Theorem 1.8 is unaffected by this correction.
[Theorem 1.5, Section 2.2] The proof of stability under weak-star convergence states 'The local energy inequality is easy to prove and we omit the details.' Definition 1.2 requires the limit u to satisfy the local energy inequality, and this is not a purely cosmetic point: the term w·∇V wϕ, which the authors themselves mention, does not enjoy the cancellation used for the other nonlinear terms. The details should be included, or a precise reference should be given that covers the supercritical Lp,∞ setting rather than the critical setting of [9].

minor comments (4)

[Corollary 1.9] The corollary says 'Let u and v be L3,∞-weak solutions with data u0 and v0,' but u0,v0 are assumed to lie in Lp,∞ for p∈(2,3), which does not imply membership in L3,∞; this should be Lp,∞-weak solutions.
[Theorem 1.10] For p=3 the phrase 'Lp,∞-weak solution' is ambiguous because Definition 1.2 is only made for 2<p<3; please state explicitly that the p=3 case refers to Definition 1.1.
[Corollary 2.4 proof] In the dimensional analysis following the choice of N, the displayed calculation gives a length scale to the power (α−p)/(p−α), which equals −1; the sentence 'which matches the left-hand side' is not transparent, since the left-hand side has dimension length squared. Please spell out the dimensional bookkeeping.
[Section 3, inequalities (3.2)-(3.6)] The notation L^{p′,1}_y for Lorentz spaces is used in the proof of Lemma 3.2 without definition; a one-sentence definition or a reference would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation found: Theorem 1.4 is proved from the external lemma [9, Lemma 3.3] and independent PDE estimates; flagged issues are omitted proofs and a weakened definition, not self-referential reductions.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is Definition 1.2 -> Lemma 2.2 -> Theorem 2.3 -> Corollary 2.4 -> Theorem 1.4 -> Theorems 1.8 and 1.10. I find no step in which a claimed output is an input by construction. Theorem 1.4's a priori bound is not assumed in Definition 1.2: the definition only requires finiteness of sup_s ||u - e^{sDelta}u0||^2_{L2} + integral ||nabla(u - e^{sDelta}u0)||^2_{L2} ds, while the theorem proves a quantitative power-law decay and dissipation bound with a specific exponent sigma(p). Lemma 2.2 invokes [9, Lemma 3.3] (Barker-Seregin-Sverak) to justify the local-energy-inequality passage; that is an external, published, parameter-free lemma whose stated hypotheses do not include Theorem 1.4, so it is independent support rather than circularity. Self-citations to [13] (Bradshaw-Phelps) supply a proof template and background asymptotic-expansion results; they are not used to assume the new conclusions or to rule out alternatives, and they are externally published, so they do not create circularity. The genuine weaknesses are proof omissions and an unverified modification: Lemma 2.2 says 'this is an easy calculation and is omitted'; Section 2.2 says 'The local energy inequality is easy to prove and we omit the details'; and Definition 1.2 drops condition (1.4), with the assertion that 'this modification seems harmless' left unverified for the applicability of [9, Lemma 3.3]. These are completeness or correctness risks for the derivation, but they are not reductions of a result to its own assumptions. The score of 2 reflects the minor role of author-overlapping citations and the presence of asserted-but-unproved load-bearing steps, while the central estimate retains independent mathematical content.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted parameters or new physical entities. It relies on standard background results in the field, plus a modified definition of weak solution tailored to supercritical data. The free-parameter ledger is empty because the proof optimizes the decomposition scale N and all constants are universal.

assumptions (6)

standard math Existence of Leray-Hopf weak solutions with local energy inequality for smooth compactly supported initial data.
Used in the proof of Theorem 1.3 via an approximating sequence; classical results of Leray and Caffarelli, Kohn and Nirenberg are cited.
standard math Barker-Seregin-Sverak Lorentz space decomposition lemma (Lemma 2.1).
Core tool in Theorem 2.3 to split supercritical data into subcritical plus L2 parts; stated as Lemma 2.1 and cited to [9].
standard math O'Neil convolution inequality and heat kernel estimates in Lorentz spaces (equations 2.1 to 2.3).
Used throughout for Lorentz space bounds and caloric extension estimates.
standard math Jia-Sverak local smoothing theorem (Theorem 3.1).
Used in the zeroth step of the asymptotic expansion to obtain a local C^γ bound for u minus a strong solution; cited to [36].
standard math Escauriaza-Seregin-Sverak L3 regularity criterion.
Invoked to contextualize critical regularity classes and the supercritical setting of Theorem 1.10; cited to [33].
domain assumption Definition 1.2 drops a convergence condition present in the L3,∞-weak solution definition of [9].
The modified class is the object of all subsequent theorems; the authors argue the omitted term is harmless for L2-decay, but the full equivalence with the earlier class is not established.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Time asymptotics, time regularity and separation rates for Navier-Stokes flows in supercritical solution classes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RBLV4HIN

@misc{pith2026250800714,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Time asymptotics, time regularity and separation rates for Navier-Stokes flows in supercritical solution classes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RBLV4HIN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.00714}
}

abstract

This paper extends the weak solution theory for the 3D Navier-Stokes equations of Barker, Seregin and Sverak from a critical setting to a supercritical setting making sure to include a useful a priori energy bound as well as a statement about stability under weak-star convergence. Two applications of the a priori bound are then explored. The first provides a spatially local, short-time asymptotic expansion in the time variable starting at $t=0$ which, as a corollary, provides an upper bound on how fast hypothetical non-unique solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations can separate locally. The second establishes higher-order time regularity at a singular time and at spatial points positioned away from the singularity. This quantifies the degree to which the non-local nature of the pressure allows a far flung singularity to disrupt the time regularity at a regular point.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

[9]

and ˇSver´ ak, V., On stability of weak Navier-Stokes solutions with large L3,∞ initial data

Barker, T., Seregin, G. and ˇSver´ ak, V., On stability of weak Navier-Stokes solutions with large L3,∞ initial data. Comm. Par. Diff. Eq. 43 (2018), no. 4, 628-651

work page 2018
[13]

and Phelps, P., Estimation of non-uniqueness and short-time asymptotic expansions for Navier-Stokes flows, Ann

Bradshaw, Z. and Phelps, P., Estimation of non-uniqueness and short-time asymptotic expansions for Navier-Stokes flows, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire 41 (2024), no. 4, 877–896

work page 2024
[1]

and Barker, T., Global Weak Besov Solutions of the Navier-Stokes Equations and Applications

Albritton, D. and Barker, T., Global Weak Besov Solutions of the Navier-Stokes Equations and Applications. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 232, 197–263 (2019)

work page 2019
[2]

and Prange, C., Localized smoothing and concentration for the Navier-Stokes equations in the half space

Albritton, D., Barker, T. and Prange, C., Localized smoothing and concentration for the Navier-Stokes equations in the half space. J. Funct. Anal. 284 (2023), no. 1, Paper No. 109729, 42 pp

work page 2023
[3]

Albritton, D., Bru´ e, E., and Colombo, M., Non-uniqueness of Leray solutions of the forced Navier-Stokes equations. Ann. of Math. (2) 196 (2022), no. 1, 415–455

work page 2022
[4]

Bae, H. O. and Brandolese, L., On the effect of external forces on incompressible fluid motions at large distances. Ann. Univ. Ferrara (2009) 55:225–238

work page 2009
[5]

Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Prin- ciples of Mathematical Sciences], 343

Bahouri, H., Chemin, J.-Y., and Danchin, R., Fourier analysis and nonlinear partial dif- ferential equations. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Prin- ciples of Mathematical Sciences], 343. Springer, Heidelberg, 2011. xvi+523 pp

work page 2011
[6]

and Prange, C., Localized Smoothing for the Navier-Stokes Equations and Con- centration of Critical Norms Near Singularities

Barker, T. and Prange, C., Localized Smoothing for the Navier-Stokes Equations and Con- centration of Critical Norms Near Singularities. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 236 (2020), no. 3, 1487-1541

work page 2020

Show all 68 references

[7]

Barker, T., About local continuity with respect to L2 initial data for energy solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations. Math. Ann. 381 (2021), no. 3-4, 1373–1415

2021
[8]

Barker, T., Existence and Weak* Stability for the Navier-Stokes System with Initial Values in Critical Besov Spaces, arXiv preprint, https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.06841

arXiv
[10]

Basson, A., Solutions spatialement homog´ enes adapt´ ees au sens de Caffareli, Kohn et Nirenberg des ´ equations de Navier-Stokes, Th` ese, Universit´ e d’´Evry, 2006. 35

2006
[11]

Nonlinearity 37 (2024), no

Bradshaw, Z., Remarks on the separation of Navier-Stokes flows. Nonlinearity 37 (2024), no. 9, Paper No. 095023, 33 pp

2024
[12]

and Phelps, P., Spatial decay of discretely self-similar solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations

Bradshaw, Z. and Phelps, P., Spatial decay of discretely self-similar solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations. Pure Appl. Anal. 5 (2023), no. 2, 377–407

2023
[14]

and Tsai, T.-P., Forward discretely self-similar solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations II

Bradshaw, Z. and Tsai, T.-P., Forward discretely self-similar solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations II. Ann. Henri Poincar´ e 18 (2017), no. 3, 1095-1119

2017
[15]

and Tsai, T.-P., Global existence, regularity, and uniqueness of infinite energy solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations

Bradshaw, Z. and Tsai, T.-P., Global existence, regularity, and uniqueness of infinite energy solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations. Comm. Partial Differential Equations 45 (2020), no. 9, 1168–1201

2020
[16]

and Tsai, T.-P., On the local pressure expansion for the Navier-Stokes equations

Bradshaw, Z. and Tsai, T.-P., On the local pressure expansion for the Navier-Stokes equations. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 24 (2022), no. 1, Paper No. 3, 32 pp

2022
[17]

and Wang, W., Asymptotic stability for the 3D Navier-Stokes equations in and nearby spaces

Bradshaw, Z. and Wang, W., Asymptotic stability for the 3D Navier-Stokes equations in and nearby spaces. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. Published electronically: June 26, 2025

2025
[18]

Brandolese, L., Fine properties of self-similar solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 192 (2009), no. 3, 375-401

2009
[19]

and Vigneron, F., New asymptotic profiles of nonstationary solutions of the Navier-Stokes system

Brandolese, L. and Vigneron, F., New asymptotic profiles of nonstationary solutions of the Navier-Stokes system. J. Math. Pure Appl. 88 (2007), 64-86

2007
[20]

and Vicol, V., Nonuniqueness of weak solutions to the Navier-Stokes equation

Buckmaster, T. and Vicol, V., Nonuniqueness of weak solutions to the Navier-Stokes equation. Annals of Math. 189 (2019),no. 1, 101-144

2019
[21]

and Nirenberg, L., Partial regularity of suitable weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations

Caffarelli, L., Kohn, R. and Nirenberg, L., Partial regularity of suitable weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 35 (1982), no. 6, 771-831

1982
[22]

P., Existence of weak solutions for the Navier-Stokes equations with initial data in Lp

Calder´ on, C. P., Existence of weak solutions for the Navier-Stokes equations with initial data in Lp. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 318 (1990), no. 1, 179-200

1990
[23]

and Palasek, S., Non-Uniqueness of Smooth Solutions of the Navier-Stokes Equations from Critical Data

Coiculescu, M. and Palasek, S., Non-Uniqueness of Smooth Solutions of the Navier-Stokes Equations from Critical Data. ArXiv preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.14699
[24]

Nonlinear Anal

Dao, N.A., D ´ ıaz, J.I., and Nguyen, Q.-H., Generalized Gagliardo–Nirenberg inequali- ties using Lorentz spaces, BMO, H¨ older spaces and fractional Sobolev spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 173 (2018), 146-153

2018
[25]

and La, J

Drivas, T.D., Elgindi, T.M. and La, J. Propagation of singularities by Osgood vector fields and for 2D inviscid incompressible fluids. Math. Ann. (2022)

2022
[26]

Chae, D., and Wolf, J., Existence of discretely self-similar solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations for initial value in L2 loc(R3), Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire (2017)

2017
[27]

Dong, H., and Li, D., Optimal local smoothing and analyticity rate estimates for the generalized Navier-Stokes equations. Commun. Math. Sci. 7 (2009), no. 1, 67-80

2009
[28]

and Zhang, Q., Time analyticity for the heat equation and Navier-Stokes equa- tions J

Dong, H. and Zhang, Q., Time analyticity for the heat equation and Navier-Stokes equa- tions J. Funct. Anal. 279 (2020), no. 4, 108563, 15 pp

2020
[29]

G., and Lemari´ e-Rieusset, P

Fern´ andez-Dalgo, P. G., and Lemari´ e-Rieusset, P. G., Weak solutions for Navier-Stokes equations with initial data in weighted L2 spaces, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 237 (2020)

2020
[30]

and Riviere, N.M., The initial value problem for the Navier-Stokes Equations with Data in Lp

Fabes, E.B., Jones, B.F. and Riviere, N.M., The initial value problem for the Navier-Stokes Equations with Data in Lp. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 45 (1972), 222–240. 36

1972
[31]

and Planchon, F., Asymptotics and stability for global solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations

Gallagher, I., Iftimie, D. and Planchon, F., Asymptotics and stability for global solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 53 (2003), no. 5, 1387-1424

2003
[32]

and ˇSver´ ak, V., Numerical investigations of non-uniqueness for Navier-Stokes initial value problem in borderline spaces

Guillod, J. and ˇSver´ ak, V., Numerical investigations of non-uniqueness for Navier-Stokes initial value problem in borderline spaces. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 25 (2023), no. 3, Paper No. 46, 25 pp

2023
[33]

A., ˇSver´ ak, V.,L3,∞-solutions of Navier-Stokes equations and backward uniqueness

Escauriaza, L., Seregin, G. A., ˇSver´ ak, V.,L3,∞-solutions of Navier-Stokes equations and backward uniqueness. (Russian) Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 58 (2003), no. 2(350), 3–44; translation in Russian Math. Surveys 58 (2003), no. 2, 211–250

2003
[34]

Hopf, E., ¨Uber die Anfangswertaufgabe f¨ ur die hydrodynamischen Grundgleichungen, Math. Nachr. 4 (1951), 213–231

1951
[35]

and ˇSver´ ak, V., Are the incompressible 3D Navier-Stokes equations locally ill-posed in the natural energy space? J

Jia, H. and ˇSver´ ak, V., Are the incompressible 3D Navier-Stokes equations locally ill-posed in the natural energy space? J. Funct. Anal. Volume 268 (2015), Issue 12, 3734-3766

2015
[36]

and ˇSver´ ak, V., Local-in-space estimates near initial time for weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations and forward self similar solutions

Jia, H. and ˇSver´ ak, V., Local-in-space estimates near initial time for weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations and forward self similar solutions. Invent. Math. 196 (2014), no. 1, 233–265

2014
[37]

Kato, T., Strong Lp-solutions of the Navier-Stokes equation in Rm, with applications to weak solutions. Math. Z. 187 (1984), no. 4, 471–480

1984
[38]

and Tsai, T.-P., An ϵ-regularity criterion and estimates of the regular set for Navier-Stokes flows in terms of initial data

Kang, K., Miura, H. and Tsai, T.-P., An ϵ-regularity criterion and estimates of the regular set for Navier-Stokes flows in terms of initial data. Pure Appl. Anal. 3 (2021) 567-59

2021
[39]

and Tsai, T.-P., short-time regularity of Navier-Stokes flows with locally L3 initial data and applications

Kang, K., Miura, H. and Tsai, T.-P., short-time regularity of Navier-Stokes flows with locally L3 initial data and applications. Int. Math. Res. Not. 2021, no. 11, 8763–8805

2021
[40]

and Seregin, G., Weak solutions to the Cauchy problem for the Navier-Stokes equations satisfying the local energy inequality

Kikuchi, N. and Seregin, G., Weak solutions to the Cauchy problem for the Navier-Stokes equations satisfying the local energy inequality. Nonlinear equations and spectral theory. 141-164, Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. Ser. 2, 220, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2007

2007
[41]

and Ries, E., Asymptotic Expansion for solutions of the Navier-Stokes equa- tions with potential forces

Kukavica, I. and Ries, E., Asymptotic Expansion for solutions of the Navier-Stokes equa- tions with potential forces. J. Diff. Eq. 250 (2011), 607–622

2011
[42]

Kwon, H., The role of the pressure in the regularity theory for the Navier-Stokes equations. J. Diff. Eq. 357, (2023), 1-31

2023
[43]

and Tsai, T.-P., Global Navier-Stokes flows for non-decaying initial data with slowly decaying oscillation

Kwon, H. and Tsai, T.-P., Global Navier-Stokes flows for non-decaying initial data with slowly decaying oscillation. Comm. Math. Phys. (2020), no. 3, 1665-1715

2020
[44]

G., Recent developments in the Navier-Stokes problem

Lemari´ e-Rieusset, P. G., Recent developments in the Navier-Stokes problem. Chapman Hall/CRC Research Notes in Mathematics, 431. Chapman Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2002

2002
[45]

G., The Navier-Stokes equations in the critical Morrey-Campanato space

Lemari´ e-Rieusset, P. G., The Navier-Stokes equations in the critical Morrey-Campanato space. Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 23 (2007), no. 3, 897-930

2007
[46]

G.,The Navier-Stokes problem in the 21st century

Lemari´ e-Rieusset, P. G.,The Navier-Stokes problem in the 21st century . CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2016

2016
[47]

Acta Math

Leray, J., Sur le mouvement d’un liquide visqueux emplissant l’espace. Acta Math. 63 (1934), no. 1, 193-248

1934
[48]

and Prange, C., Local energy weak solutions for the Navier-Stokes equations in the half-space, Comm

Maekawa, Y., Miura, H. and Prange, C., Local energy weak solutions for the Navier-Stokes equations in the half-space, Comm. Math. Phys. 367 (2019), no. 2, 517-580

2019
[49]

and Terasawa, Y., The Navier-Stokes equations with initial data in uniformly local Lp spaces

Maekawa, Y. and Terasawa, Y., The Navier-Stokes equations with initial data in uniformly local Lp spaces. Differential Integral Equations 19 (2006), no. 4, 369-400

2006
[50]

and Sverak, V., On Leray’s self-similar solutions of the Navier- Stokes equations

Necas, J., Ruzicka, M. and Sverak, V., On Leray’s self-similar solutions of the Navier- Stokes equations. Acta Math. 176 (1996), no. 2, 283–294. 37

1996
[51]

O’Neil, R., Convolution operators and L(p, q) spaces, Duke Mathematical Journal, Duke Math. J. 30(1), 129-142, (March 1963)

1963
[52]

Neuere Methoden und Ergebnisse in der Hydrodynamik,

Oseen, C. W., “Neuere Methoden und Ergebnisse in der Hydrodynamik,” Akademische Verlags-gesellschaft, Leipzig, 1927

1927
[53]

ArXiv preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.06179

Palasek, S., Non-uniqueness in the Leray-Hopf class for a dyadic Navier-Stokes model. ArXiv preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.06179

arXiv
[54]

The real butterfly effect

Palmer, T., D¨ oring, A., and Seregin, G. The real butterfly effect. Nonlinearity, 27 (2014) (9), R123-R141

2014
[55]

Popkin, H., On Rough Calder´ on Solutions to the Navier–Stokes Equations and Applica- tions to the Singular Set. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 27, 25 (2025)

2025
[56]

In Turbulence and Navier-Stokes equations (Proc

Scheffer, V., Turbulence and Hausdorff dimension. In Turbulence and Navier-Stokes equations (Proc. Conf., Univ. Paris-Sud, Orsay, 1975) , pages 174–183. Lecture Notes in Math., Vol. 565. Springer, Berlin, 1976

1975
[57]

and ˇSver´ ak, V., On global weak solutions to the Cauchy problem for the Navier-Stokes equations with large L3-initial data

Seregin, G. and ˇSver´ ak, V., On global weak solutions to the Cauchy problem for the Navier-Stokes equations with large L3-initial data. Nonlinear Anal. 154 (2017), 269-296

2017
[58]

Serrin, J., On the interior regularity of weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 9, 187–195 (1962)

1962
[59]

and Shimizu, S., A decay property of the Fourier transform and its application to the Stokes problem

Shibata, Y. and Shimizu, S., A decay property of the Fourier transform and its application to the Stokes problem. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 3 (2001), no. 3, 213-230

2001
[60]

A., Estimates for solutions of a non-stationary linearized system of Navier- Stokes equations

Solonnikov, V. A., Estimates for solutions of a non-stationary linearized system of Navier- Stokes equations. (Russian) Trudy Mat. Inst. Steklov. 70 (1964) 213–317

1964
[61]

Tao, T., Finite time blowup for an averaged three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equation J. Amer. Math. Soc. 29 (2016), no. 3, 601-674

2016
[62]

and Mailybaev, A.A., From the butterfly effect to spontaneous stochasticity in singular shear flows

Thalabard, S., Bec, J. and Mailybaev, A.A., From the butterfly effect to spontaneous stochasticity in singular shear flows. Commun. Phys 3, 122 (2020)

2020
[63]

Tsai, T.-P., Forward discretely self-similar solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations. Comm. Math. Phys. 328 (2014), no. 1, 29-44

2014
[64]

Graduate Studies in Mathematics, 192

Tsai, T.-P., Lectures on Navier-Stokes Equations. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, 192. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2018

2018
[65]

Tsai, T.-P., On Leray’s self-similar solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations satisfying local energy estimates. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 143 (1998), no. 1, 29–51

1998
[66]

and Yang, M

Vasseur, A. and Yang, M. Boundary vorticity estimates for Navier-Stokes and application to the inviscid limit, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 55 (2023), no. 4, 3081–3107

2023
[67]

and Yang, J., Layer separation of the 3D incompressible Navier-Stokes equa- tion in a bounded domain, Comm

Vasseur, A. and Yang, J., Layer separation of the 3D incompressible Navier-Stokes equa- tion in a bounded domain, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 49 (2024), no. 4, 381–409

2024
[68]

Yamazaki, M., The Navier-Stokes equations in the weak- Ln space with time-dependent external force. Math. Ann. 317 (2000), 635-675. 38

2000

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [9]

and ˇSver´ ak, V., On stability of weak Navier-Stokes solutions with large L3,∞ initial data

Barker, T., Seregin, G. and ˇSver´ ak, V., On stability of weak Navier-Stokes solutions with large L3,∞ initial data. Comm. Par. Diff. Eq. 43 (2018), no. 4, 628-651

work page 2018

[2] [13]

and Phelps, P., Estimation of non-uniqueness and short-time asymptotic expansions for Navier-Stokes flows, Ann

Bradshaw, Z. and Phelps, P., Estimation of non-uniqueness and short-time asymptotic expansions for Navier-Stokes flows, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire 41 (2024), no. 4, 877–896

work page 2024

[3] [1]

and Barker, T., Global Weak Besov Solutions of the Navier-Stokes Equations and Applications

Albritton, D. and Barker, T., Global Weak Besov Solutions of the Navier-Stokes Equations and Applications. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 232, 197–263 (2019)

work page 2019

[4] [2]

and Prange, C., Localized smoothing and concentration for the Navier-Stokes equations in the half space

Albritton, D., Barker, T. and Prange, C., Localized smoothing and concentration for the Navier-Stokes equations in the half space. J. Funct. Anal. 284 (2023), no. 1, Paper No. 109729, 42 pp

work page 2023

[5] [3]

Albritton, D., Bru´ e, E., and Colombo, M., Non-uniqueness of Leray solutions of the forced Navier-Stokes equations. Ann. of Math. (2) 196 (2022), no. 1, 415–455

work page 2022

[6] [4]

Bae, H. O. and Brandolese, L., On the effect of external forces on incompressible fluid motions at large distances. Ann. Univ. Ferrara (2009) 55:225–238

work page 2009

[7] [5]

Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Prin- ciples of Mathematical Sciences], 343

Bahouri, H., Chemin, J.-Y., and Danchin, R., Fourier analysis and nonlinear partial dif- ferential equations. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Prin- ciples of Mathematical Sciences], 343. Springer, Heidelberg, 2011. xvi+523 pp

work page 2011

[8] [6]

and Prange, C., Localized Smoothing for the Navier-Stokes Equations and Con- centration of Critical Norms Near Singularities

Barker, T. and Prange, C., Localized Smoothing for the Navier-Stokes Equations and Con- centration of Critical Norms Near Singularities. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 236 (2020), no. 3, 1487-1541

work page 2020