Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Nijenhuis pre-Lie bialgebras, Nijenhuis Lie bialgebras and \sss-equation

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that compatible solutions of the S-equation and the co-S-equation produce Nijenhuis operators, and that balanced Nijenhuis pre-Lie bialgebras descend to Nijenhuis Lie bialgebras.

desk verdict A genuinely new structural bridge from pseudo-Hessian pre-Lie algebras to Nijenhuis operators, but the construction's reach is only demonstrated in 2D; worth a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.02983 v1 pith:Y5GCFARG submitted 2025-08-05 math.QA math.RT

Li Guo , Tianshui Ma This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.QAmath.RT MSC 17B3816T2516T1017A3017B6237K99
keywords Nijenhuisoperatorspre-Liebialgebraspseudo-HessianalgebrasS-equationco-S-equationLieO-operatorsmatchedpairs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper builds a bridge between two structures attached to pre-Lie algebras: Nijenhuis operators, which encode deformations, and pre-Lie bialgebras, which encode compatible coalgebra structures and originate in para-Kähler geometry. Its first main result shows that a symmetric solution $r$ of the S-equation together with a compatible symmetric bilinear form $\beta$ produce a Nijenhuis operator by the formula $N(x)=\sum_i \beta(x,a_i)b_i$. The paper then introduces Nijenhuis operators on pre-Lie coalgebras and defines Nijenhuis pre-Lie bialgebras, characterising them through matched pairs and relating them to an enriched $S$-Nijenhuis S-equation and to $O$-operators. In the final step it proves that a balanced Nijenhuis pre-Lie bialgebra, with bracket $[x,y]=x\circ y-y\circ x$ and coproduct $\delta(x)=x_{(1)}\otimes x_{(2)}-x_{(2)}\otimes x_{(1)}$, yields a Nijenhuis Lie bialgebra.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the S-equation and its dual, the co-S-equation, together with the notion of a pseudo-Hessian pre-Lie algebra. The S-equation is the pre-Lie analogue of the classical Yang-Baxter equation; for $r=\sum_i a_i\otimes b_i$ it reads $\sum_{i,j}(a_i\otimes b_i\circ a_j\otimes b_j + a_i\otimes a_j\otimes b_i\circ b_j)=\sum_{i,j}(a_i\circ a_j\otimes b_i\otimes b_j + a_i\otimes a_j\otimes b_j\circ b_i)$, and its symmetric solutions make $(A,\circ,\Delta_r)$ a quasitriangular pre-Lie bialgebra. A dual quasitriangular pre-Lie bialgebra is built from a symmetric solution $\beta$ of the co-S-equation via the multiplication $x\circ_\beta y=x_{(1)}\beta(x_{(2)},y)+y_{(1)}\beta(x,y_{(2)})-\beta(x,y_{(1)})y_{(2)}$. The theorem's formula $N(x)=\sum_i \beta(x,a_i)b_i$ is the contraction of $\beta$ with the $r$-matrix, and the Nijenhuis condition follows from combining the S-equation, the co-S-equation, and the pseudo-Hessian identity $\beta(x\circ y,z)-\beta(x,y\circ z)=\beta(y\circ x,z)-\beta(y,x\circ z)$.

What would settle it

Build a pseudo-Hessian pre-Lie algebra in dimension three, choose a symmetric tensor $r$ and bilinear form $\beta$ that satisfy the paper's compatibility conditions, and test whether $N(x)=\sum_i\beta(x,a_i)b_i$ obeys the defining Nijenhuis identity; one failure would refute the main construction, and the paper offers no higher-dimensional example to test.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the classical $r$-matrix mechanism for Lie bialgebras has a pre-Lie counterpart that also generates Nijenhuis data. Theorem 3.3 states: if $(A,\circ,\beta)$ is a pseudo-Hessian pre-Lie algebra and $r=\sum_i a_i\otimes b_i$ is a symmetric solution of the S-equation such that $(A,\circ,r,\Delta_r)$ is a quasitriangular pre-Lie bialgebra and $(A,\Delta_r,\beta,\circ_\beta)$ is a dual quasitriangular pre-Lie bialgebra, then $N(x)=\sum_i \beta(x,a_i)b_i$ is a Nijenhuis operator on $(A,\circ)$. The paper proves the dual statement on the coalgebra side, giving Nijenhuis operators on pre-Lie coalgebras from pseudo-Hessian pre-Lie coalgebras and dual quasitriangular structures. It then assembles these pieces into Nijenhuis pre-Lie bialgebras and characterises them via matched pairs of Nijenhuis pre-Lie algebras. The closing theorem shows that a balanced Nijenhuis pre-Lie bialgebra induces a Nijenhuis Lie bialgebra with the commutator bracket $[x,y]=x\circ y-y\circ x$ and skew-symmetrised coproduct $\delta(x)=x_{(1)}\otimes x_{(2)}-x_{(2)}\otimes x_{(1)}$.

Load-bearing premise

The construction works only when a chosen tensor and a chosen symmetric bilinear form each satisfy a matching equation and are mutually compatible, a condition the paper verifies only in two-dimensional examples.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A compatible pair $(\beta,r)$ satisfying the hypotheses of Theorem 3.3 automatically yields a Nijenhuis operator, so the deformation-theoretic Nijenhuis condition is produced from bialgebra data rather than checked by hand.
  • The dual construction produces Nijenhuis operators on pre-Lie coalgebras, so the theory extends to the coalgebra side and the bialgebraic framework is closed under dualisation.
  • Solutions of the $S$-Nijenhuis S-equation are exactly the data making a quasitriangular Nijenhuis pre-Lie bialgebra, and they correspond to $O$-operators, mirroring the classical $r$-matrix/$O$-operator equivalence.
  • If the underlying pre-Lie bialgebra is balanced, the commutator bracket and skew-symmetrised coproduct make the Nijenhuis pre-Lie bialgebra into a Nijenhuis Lie bialgebra.
  • The two-dimensional examples in the paper become explicit Nijenhuis Lie bialgebras, so the final theorem provides concrete test objects for later work.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An extension the authors leave implicit: the same pattern of contracting a 2-cocycle pairing with an $r$-matrix solution should produce Nijenhuis-type operators in other varieties of algebras whenever an analogue of the S-equation is available.
  • A natural next test is dimensional: the paper's examples are all two-dimensional, and exhibiting a compatible $(\beta,r)$ pair in dimension three or more would show the construction is not a low-dimensional artefact.
  • One practical consequence not drawn in the paper is that balanced Nijenhuis pre-Lie bialgebras give a route from pre-Lie data to Lie-bialgebra-based integrable systems, since the induced Nijenhuis Lie bialgebra carries both a compatible bracket and a compatible Nijenhuis operator.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a framework connecting Nijenhuis operators with pre-Lie bialgebras. Its main structural results are: a construction of Nijenhuis operators on pseudo-Hessian pre-Lie algebras from compatible quasitriangular and dual quasitriangular pre-Lie bialgebra structures (Theorem 3.3); a dual construction of Nijenhuis operators on pre-Lie coalgebras (Theorem 4.8); the introduction of Nijenhuis pre-Lie bialgebras with admissibility conditions, their characterization via matched pairs (Theorem 5.14), and their relation to an S-Nijenhuis S-equation and O-operators (Theorems 5.17, 5.21, 5.26); and a theorem showing that balanced Nijenhuis pre-Lie bialgebras induce Nijenhuis Lie bialgebras (Theorem 6.5). All explicit nontrivial examples are two-dimensional.

Significance. If the structural theorems hold, the paper gives a coherent dictionary between pre-Lie bialgebras, Nijenhuis operators, S-equations, and Lie bialgebras, with a particularly clean reduction in Theorem 6.5. The definitions of Nijenhuis pre-Lie bialgebra and S-Nijenhuis S-equation are natural, and the use of dual representations and O-operators is a sound organizing principle. However, the central constructive claim in Theorem 3.3 is conditional on a simultaneous compatibility of several equations, and the paper supplies no nontrivial example in dimension greater than two; the nondegenerate case collapses to the identity operator. The paper also contains internal referencing errors and some compressed proofs that need repair before the results can be fully trusted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, Theorem 3.3 and Examples 3.4-3.5] The central construction is conditional on a pair (β, r) satisfying Eqs. (6), (9), and (13) simultaneously, but the paper does not establish that nontrivial such pairs exist outside dimension two. Example 3.4 shows that for nondegenerate r the resulting Nijenhuis operator is forced to be the identity, so all genuinely new examples must come from degenerate r; the only such realizations supplied are Examples 3.5, 5.9, and 6.6, all two-dimensional. Since the Introduction advertises this as a method for constructing Nijenhuis operators, the absence of any higher-dimensional example or general existence argument leaves the reach of the method unsubstantiated; I ask the authors either to provide such examples, prove a reduction or existence statement, or explicitly state the conditional scope.
  2. [Lemma 5.15(b)] The proof of part (b) concludes "Eq. (41) ⇔ Eq. (81)", but Eq. (81) does not exist in the manuscript; the displayed equivalence in part (b) is labelled (48), so the reference is internally inconsistent. Because Lemma 5.15 is the core input for Theorem 5.17, this broken reference needs to be corrected and the intended equivalence made explicit.
  3. [Theorem 5.17] The proof of Theorem 5.17 is only the sentence "By Lemma 5.15 and Remark 5.16, we obtain Theorem 5.17", but the theorem claims that the single condition (50) suffices for all of Eqs. (19), (41), and (42). The reduction through Lemma 5.15 requires checking that (50) together with S-admissibility and the S-equation implies the operator identities (47)-(49); this is not a one-line consequence and needs to be shown. As stated, the proof is incomplete for a result that underpins the later O-operator and S-Nijenhuis S-equation sections.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.2, proof of Theorem 4.8] There is a typo "by by the symmetry of r" in the displayed computation following Eq. (31); it should read "by the symmetry of r".
  2. [Section 5.4, Theorem 5.26] The phrase "(A,N) is φ-admisssible" contains a misspelling of "admissible", and similar misspellings appear in the surrounding paragraphs.
  3. [Example 6.2] The claim that all pre-Lie bialgebras in Example 5.9 are balanced is stated without verification; a short indication or table would make the application of Theorem 6.5 easier to check.
  4. [Theorem 5.21 proof] The proof contains the stray notation "Eq�(52)" and later "Eq�(51)"; these should be normalized to standard equation references and punctuation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the derivation chain is conditional and self-contained, with only a proof-template self-citation that is not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central result, Theorem 3.3, is a conditional construction: N is defined by Eq. (15) from a pseudo-Hessian form β and an element r, and the proof shows the Nijenhuis identity follows from the assumed S-equation (6), co-S-equation (9), and pseudo-Hessian condition (13). The final contraction '= 0 (by Eq. (6) and the symmetry of r)' uses the assumed input, not a fitted or renamed output; the theorem is a sufficient-condition statement, and Example 3.4 explicitly shows that the nondegenerate case gives N = id, which is consistent with rather than concealed by the construction. Standard equivalences cited from [1] and [36]—for example Proposition 2.2 and Theorem 5.21—are external support for well-known S-equation/O-operator facts, not for the paper's target results. The only overlap with the present authors' prior work is the proof of Proposition 5.27, which says 'A detailed proof follows the one for [4, Proposition 4.22]' with [4] by Bai, Guo and Ma; this is a proof-style citation for explicit displayed equations and is not the premise of any main theorem. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness or ansatz is imported via self-citation. The paper's genuine weakness is existential—the simultaneous hypotheses of Theorem 3.3 are realized only in low-dimensional examples—but that is a generality and existence concern, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper does not fit any parameters to data; all constants in examples are arbitrary or part of the construction. The central claims rest on standard algebraic axioms plus several compatibility conditions (pseudo-Hessian, co-S-equation, S-admissibility, balanced) that are new or imported from prior work. No new entities such as particles or fields are introduced; the 'Nijenhuis pre-Lie bialgebra' is a definition, not a postulated object.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Working over a fixed field K; all vector spaces, tensor products, and linear maps are over K.
    Assumed throughout, stated in the Notations paragraph of the introduction.
  • standard math Pre-Lie algebra identity Eq. (1) and pre-Lie coalgebra identity Eq. (2).
    Definitions 2.1 and background from [1,21].
  • domain assumption The bilinear form β is a pseudo-Hessian 2-cocycle, satisfying Eq. (13).
    Definition 2.8; used to derive Eq. (16) in the proof of Theorem 3.3.
  • domain assumption The bilinear form β satisfies the co-S-equation, Eq. (9).
    Definition 2.4 and Theorem 2.5; key hypothesis for the multiplication ◦_β and the Nijenhuis property.
  • ad hoc to paper Nijenhuis pre-Lie bialgebra requires S-admissibility, Eqs. (39) and (40), and N*-admissibility, Eqs. (41) and (42).
    Definition 5.8; these compatibility conditions are introduced in this paper.
  • domain assumption Balanced condition Eq. (79) for pre-Lie bialgebra to induce a Lie bialgebra.
    Definition 6.1 and Theorem 6.4; assumed for the final application.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nijenhuis pre-Lie bialgebras, Nijenhuis Lie bialgebras and \sss-equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Y5GCFARG

@misc{pith2026250802983,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nijenhuis pre-Lie bialgebras, Nijenhuis Lie bialgebras and \sss-equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Y5GCFARG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.02983}
}
abstract

Two aspects on the important notion of pre-Lie algebras are pre-Lie bialgebras (or left-symmetric bialgebras) with motivation from para-K\"ahler Lie algebras, and Nijenhuis operators on pre-Lie algebras arising from their deformation theory. In this paper, we present a method to construct Nijenhuis operators on a pre-Lie algebras via pseudo-Hessian pre-Lie algebras. Next, we introduce the notion of Nijenhuis operators on pre-Lie coalgebras and give their constructions, one from a linearly compatible pre-Lie coalgebra structure, and one from pre-Lie bialgebras. We then obtain a bialgebraic structure on Nijenhuis pre-Lie algebras by using dual representations and study their relations with \sss-equations and $\mathcal{O}$-operators. Finally we prove that a Nijenhuis balanced pre-Lie bialgebra produces a Nijenhuis Lie bialgebra.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Nijenhuis BiHom-Lie bialgebras and differential Lie bialgebras

    math.RA 2026-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper defines Nijenhuis BiHom-Lie bialgebras and differential Lie bialgebras and states that each is equivalent to the corresponding Manin triple and matched pair.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Bai, Left-symmetric bialgebras and an analogue of the classical Yang-Baxter equation

    C. Bai, Left-symmetric bialgebras and an analogue of the classical Yang-Baxter equation. Commun. Contemp. Math. 10(2008), 221-260. 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 13, 15, 16, 19

    work page 2008

  2. [2]

    Bai, An introduction to pre-Lie algebras

    C. Bai, An introduction to pre-Lie algebras. Algebra and applications 1: non-associative algebras and cate- gories, 245-273. ISTE, London, 2020. 2

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    C. Bai, L. Guo, G. Liu and T. Ma, Rota-Baxter Lie bialgebras, classical Yang-Baxter equations and special L-dendriform bialgebras. Algebr. Represent. Theory27 (2024), 1347-1372. 2

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    C. Bai, L. Guo and T. Ma, Bialgebras, Frobenius algebras and associative Yang-Baxter equations for Rota- Baxter algebras. Asian J. Math. 28 (2024), 411-436. 24

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Bai and D

    C. Bai and D. Meng, The classification of left-symmetric algebra in dimension 2. Chinese Sci. Bull. 41(1996), 2207 (in Chinese). 7

    work page 1996

  6. [6]

    C. Bai, Y . Sheng and C. Zhu, Lie 2-bialgebras.Comm. Math. Phys. 320 (2013), 149-172. 2

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    Benayadi and M

    S. Benayadi and M. Boucetta, On para-K ¨ahler and hyper-para-K ¨ahler Lie algebras. J. Algebra 436 (2015), 61-101. 2

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    A. V . Bolsinov, A. Y . Konyaev and V . S. Matveev, Nijenhuis geometry.Adv. Math. 394 (2022), 108001, 52 pp. 1

    work page 2022

Show all 39 references
  1. [9]

    Brzezi ´nski and J

    T. Brzezi ´nski and J. Papworth, A ffine Nijenhuis operators and Hochschild cohomology of trusses. SIGMA 19 (2023), 056. 1

    2023

  2. [10]

    Burde, Simple left-symmetric algebras with solvable Lie algebra

    D. Burde, Simple left-symmetric algebras with solvable Lie algebra. Manuscripta Math. 95 (1998), 397-411. 7

    1998

  3. [11]

    J. F. Cari ˜nena, J. Grabowski and G. Marmo, Quantum bi-Hamiltonian systems. Internat. J. Modern Phys. A 15 (2000), 4797-4810. 1

    2000

  4. [12]

    Connes and D

    A. Connes and D. Kreimer, Hopf algebras, renormalization and noncommutative geometry.Comm. Math. Phys. 199 (1998), 203-242. 2

    1998

  5. [13]

    V . G. Drinfeld, Hamiltonian structures on Lie groups, Lie bialgebras, and geometric meaning of the classi- cal Yang-Baxter equations. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 268(1983), 285-287; translation in Soviet Math. Dokl. 27 (1983), 222-225. 4, 25

    1983

  6. [14]

    Gerstenhaber, The cohomology structure of an associative ring

    M. Gerstenhaber, The cohomology structure of an associative ring. Ann. of Math. 78 (1963), 267-288. 2

    1963

  7. [15]

    S. J. Guo and Y . Zhang, The cohomology of relative cocycle weighted Reynolds operators and NS-pre-Lie algebras. Comm. Algebra 51 (2023), 5313-5331. 1 28 GUO AND MA

    2023

  8. [16]

    Hong and C

    Y . Hong and C. Bai, Conformal classical Yang-Baxter equation,S-equation andO-operators. Lett. Math. Phys. 110 (2020), 885-909. 2

    2020

  9. [17]

    Hong and F

    Y . Hong and F. Li, On left-symmetric conformal bialgebras.J. Algebra Appl. 14 (2015), 1450079. 2

    2015

  10. [18]

    Kosmann-Schwarzbach and F

    Y . Kosmann-Schwarzbach and F. Magri, Poisson-Nijenhuis structures, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e53 (1990), 35-81. 1

    1990

  11. [19]

    Lei and L

    P. Lei and L. Guo, Nijenhuis algebras, NS algebras, and N-dendriform algebras. Front. Math. China 7 (2012), 827-846. 1

    2012

  12. [20]

    Li and T

    H. Li and T. Ma, Classical Yang-Baxter equations and Nijenhuis operators for Lie algebras. arXiv:2502.18717. 26

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    Y . Lin, P. Zhou and C. Bai, Infinite-dimensional Lie bialgebras via affinization of perm bialgebras and pre-Lie bialgebras. J. Algebra 663 (2025), 210-258. 2, 3

    2025

  14. [22]

    J. Liu, T. Yue and Q. Wang, Para-K ¨ahler Lie 2-algebras, pre-Lie 2-bialgebras and 2-graded classical Yang- Baxter equations. J. Geom. Phys. (2025), 105582. 2

    2025

  15. [23]

    L. Liu, A. Makhlouf, C. Menini and F. Panaite, BiHom-NS-algebras, twisted Rota-Baxter operators and gener- alized Nijenhuis operators. Results Math. 78 (2023), Paper No. 251, 18 pp. 1

    2023

  16. [24]

    S. Liu, A. Makhlouf and L. Song, 2021. On Hom-Pre-Lie Bialgebras. J. Lie Theory 31 (2021), 149-168. 2

    2021

  17. [25]

    Ma and L

    T. Ma and L. Liu, Rota-Baxter coalgebras and Rota-Baxter bialgebras.Linear Multilinear Algebra64(5) (2016), 968-979. 3

    2016

  18. [26]

    Ma and L

    T. Ma and L. Long, Nijenhuis operators and associative D-bialgebras. J. Algebra 639 (2024), 150-186. 3

    2024

  19. [27]

    Manchon, A short survey on pre-Lie algebras, in: A

    D. Manchon, A short survey on pre-Lie algebras, in: A. Carey (Ed.), E. Schr ¨odinger Institute Lectures in Mathematical Physics, European Mathematical Society, 2011. 2

    2011

  20. [28]

    M. W. Mansouri and A. Oufkou, The classification of left-invariant para-K¨ahler structures on simply connected four-dimensional Lie groups. Complex Manifolds 9 (2022), 1-17. 2

    2022

  21. [29]

    Ni and C

    X. Ni and C. Bai, Pseudo-Hessian Lie algebras and L-dendriform bialgebras. J. Algebra 400 (2014), 273-289. 6

    2014

  22. [30]

    Nijenhuis, Xn−1-forming sets of eigenvectors

    A. Nijenhuis, Xn−1-forming sets of eigenvectors. Indagationes Math. 13 (1951), 200-212. 1

    1951

  23. [31]

    A. A. Sagle and R. E. Walde, Introduction to Lie Groups and Lie Algebras. Academic Press, New York, 1973. 6

    1973

  24. [32]

    Sti ´enon and P

    M. Sti ´enon and P. Xu, Poisson quasi-Nijenhuis manifolds. Comm. Math. Phys. 270 (2007), 709-725. 1

    2007

  25. [33]

    Sti ´enon and P

    M. Sti ´enon and P. Xu, Reduction of generalized complex structures.J. Geom. Phys. 58 (2008), 105-121. 1

    2008

  26. [34]

    M. E. Sweedler, Hopf Algebras, Benjamin, New York, 1969. 3, 25

    1969

  27. [35]

    E. B. Vinberg, The theory of convex homogeneous cones. Trans. Mosc. Math. Soc. 12(1963), 340-403; transla- tion from Trudy Moskov. Mat. Obsc.12(1963), 303-358. 2

    1963

  28. [36]

    Q. Wang, Y . Sheng, C. Bai and J. Liu, Nijenhuis operators on pre-Lie algebras. Commun. Contemp. Math. 21 (2019), 1850050. 7, 19

    2019

  29. [37]

    Y . Wang, C. Bai, J. Liu and Y . Sheng, Quasi-triangular pre-Lie bialgebras, factorizable pre-Lie bialgebras and Rota-Baxter pre-Lie algebras. J. Geom. Phys. 199 (2024), 105146. 2

    2024

  30. [38]

    Zhang, X

    H. Zhang, X. Gao and L. Guo, Compatible structures of nonsymmetric operads, Manin products and Koszul duality, Appl. Categ. Struct. 32(1) (2024), 2. 9

    2024

  31. [39]

    Zhang, X

    H. Zhang, X. Gao and L. Guo, Compatible structures of operads by polarization, their Koszul duality and Manin products, arXiv:2311.11394. 9 Department of Mathematics andComputer Science, Rutgers University, New ark, NJ 07102, USA Email address: ����������������� School of Math...

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.