Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 44 references

How to Proactively Monitor Untrusted Communications with Cell-Free Massive MIMO?

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a cell-free massive MIMO network, whose monitoring nodes overhear the pilots of an untrusted link and estimate the channels with MMSE, can then use Bayesian optimization to decide which nodes observe and which jam…

desk verdict Plausible incremental contribution to proactive monitoring in CF-mMIMO, but the abstract's universal MSP claim and pilot-observability precondition need scrutiny; worth sending to peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.03423 v2 pith:UOCVYYBV submitted 2025-08-05 eess.SP

Isabella W. G. da Silva , Zahra Mobini , Hien Q. Ngo , Hyundong Shin , Michail Matthaiou This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.SP
keywords cell-freemassiveMIMOproactivemonitoringuntrustedcommunicationsMMSEchannelestimationsuccessprobabilityBayesianoptimizationjammingpowercontrolspectralefficiency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Cell-free massive MIMO (CF-mMIMO) is proposed as a proactive monitoring system for an untrusted wireless link: some multi-antenna monitoring nodes are assigned to observe the untrusted transmitter, while others jam the untrusted receiver. The paper's method lets monitoring nodes acquire the needed CSI by overhearing the pilots of the uplink and downlink phases of the untrusted link and estimating the effective channels with minimum mean-squared error estimation. Using those estimates, the paper derives new spectral-efficiency expressions for the untrusted link and for the monitoring system under two CSI availability cases at the central processing unit, and it sets up a joint mode-assignment and jamming-power-control problem that is solved with Bayesian optimization. The quantitative claim is that this system significantly outperforms the benchmarks and achieves a monitoring success probability greater than 0.8 regardless of the number of antennas at the untrusted nodes or the precoding scheme of the untrusted link. A sympathetic reader would care because it indicates that distributed antenna infrastructure can provide reliable proactive monitoring of untrusted communications without dedicated cooperation from the untrusted terminals.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a two-phase, pilot-aided MMSE channel-estimation step coupled to a Bayesian-optimization layer. During the untrusted link's uplink and downlink pilot phases, the monitoring nodes overhear the pilots and estimate the effective channels from the untrusted transmitter and to the untrusted receiver, giving the CSI needed to derive spectral-efficiency expressions and to set up the monitoring problem. The optimization layer treats the binary assignment of each monitoring node to an observer or jammer role and the continuous jamming power allocation as decision variables, and maximizes the monitoring success probability—the probability that the eavesdropping rate at the monitoring nodes exceeds the untrusted link's data rate, making interception possible. Bayesian optimization is what makes this joint discrete-continuous search practical without requiring full CSI at the central processing unit.

What would settle it

Run the proposed protocol against an untrusted link whose transmitter randomizes or encrypts its pilot sequence in every coherence block, and check whether the monitoring success probability still stays above 0.8; if it collapses to the no-CSI baseline, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that cell-free massive MIMO can serve as a proactive monitoring system: instead of passively eavesdropping, the network assigns some multi-antenna monitoring nodes to observe the untrusted transmitter and others to jam the untrusted receiver. The key technical move is a CSI acquisition scheme in which the monitoring nodes use the pilots from both the uplink and downlink phases of the untrusted link to form MMSE estimates of the effective channels to the untrusted transmitter and receiver. From those estimates the paper derives new closed-form spectral-efficiency expressions for the untrusted link and for the monitoring link, in one case with imperfect CSI at both the monitoring nodes and the central processing unit, and in another with imperfect CSI at the nodes but no CSI at the central unit. The paper then frames the choice of which nodes observe versus jam, together with the jamming powers, as an optimization of the monitoring success probability and solves it with Bayesian optimization. The claim that follows is quantitative: with this CSI acquisition and optimization, the monitoring success probability is greater than 0.8 regardless of the number of antennas at the untrusted nodes or the precoding scheme of the untrusted link, and it significantly outperforms the benchmarks considered.

Load-bearing premise

The monitoring scheme works only if the untrusted link uses pilot signals that the monitoring nodes can hear and recognize; if the untrusted pair hides, changes, or encrypts its pilots, the channel estimates and hence the success guarantee lose their foundation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is right, an operator can monitor an untrusted link using only the pilots the link already transmits; no dedicated training or modification of the untrusted terminals is required.
  • The derived spectral-efficiency expressions give a closed-form way to quantify the interception condition and the rate cost imposed on the untrusted link, under imperfect-CSI and no-CSI-at-CPU settings, so system designers can predict monitoring performance without Monte Carlo simulation.
  • The reported floor of 0.8 monitoring success probability, across antenna counts and precoding schemes, means that simply adding antennas at the untrusted nodes or switching the precoder is not by itself enough to defeat the proposed monitor.
  • The Bayesian-optimization approach supplies a concrete procedure for deciding, per coherence block, which monitoring nodes listen and which jam, making proactive monitoring a real-time resource-allocation task rather than a static deployment.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: because monitoring nodes only need to overhear pilots, a dense cell-free network built for ordinary service could double as a monitoring overlay, making the incremental cost of proactive security monitoring mostly computational rather than radio-hardware.
  • Editorial extension: an untrusted transmitter that randomizes or encrypts its pilots would remove the prior on which the MMSE estimates rely, so a natural next test is to measure how badly the monitoring success probability degrades under blind or semi-blind estimation.
  • Editorial extension: the reported robustness across precoding schemes hints that geometry and jamming power, rather than channel-estimation accuracy, set the 0.8 floor; varying monitoring-node density and observing where the floor breaks would test this.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript, as represented by its abstract, studies a cell-free massive MIMO (CF-mMIMO) proactive monitoring system in which multiple multi-antenna monitoring nodes (MNs) are assigned either to observe an untrusted transmitter (UT) or to jam the reception at an untrusted receiver (UR). It proposes a CSI acquisition scheme in which the MNs use the pilot signals of the uplink and downlink phases of the untrusted link to estimate the effective UT and UR channels via MMSE estimation. The paper derives spectral efficiency expressions for the untrusted link and for the monitoring system under two cases of CSI availability at the central processing unit, and it introduces a joint mode assignment and jamming power control optimization that maximizes the monitoring success probability (MSP) using Bayesian optimization. The abstract claims that the proposed system significantly outperforms benchmarks and that MSP exceeds 0.8 regardless of the number of antennas at the untrusted nodes or the precoding scheme. The supplied full text is an unreadable encoding dump, and the footer contains a different arXiv identifier than the header.

Significance. If the claims hold, the paper would contribute a systematic, practical approach to proactive monitoring of untrusted communications in a distributed antenna architecture, combining an MMSE-based CSI acquisition scheme with a Bayesian-optimization-driven mode assignment and jamming power control. The claimed robustness of MSP > 0.8 across antenna counts and precoder choices is a strong, falsifiable prediction that would be valuable for physical-layer security. However, since the full text is unreadable and the abstract provides no equations, derivations, simulation parameters, confidence intervals, or benchmark details, the significance of the work cannot currently be assessed. The problem formulation itself is timely, but the evidence needed to evaluate the claims is absent.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full text (unreadable)] The supplied full text is a corrupted encoding dump: the first pages consist largely of replacement characters, and the final footer reads 'arXiv:2508.03426v1 [cs.CV] 5 Aug 2025' rather than the stated header identifier eess.SP 2508.03423. As a result, the derivations of the SE expressions, the Bayesian optimization formulation, the simulation setup, and the numerical results cannot be verified or even read. This is a load-bearing deficiency because the abstract's central claims rest entirely on these inaccessible supporting materials. A readable, correctly encoded manuscript is a prerequisite for any further review.
  2. [Abstract, claim (b)] The assertion that 'the MSP performance ... is greater than 0.8, regardless of the number of antennas at the untrusted nodes or the precoding scheme' is a universal quantifier. The abstract reports no antenna-count sweep, no list of precoders tested, no system parameter values, and no statistical uncertainty measures. A finite set of numerical experiments cannot justify a universal claim unless the simulation grid and the intended scope of the claim are explicitly specified. As stated, the claim is under-specified and not testable from the available material.
  3. [Abstract, CSI acquisition] The proposed CSI acquisition relies on the monitoring nodes overhearing and knowing the pilot signals transmitted by the untrusted transmitter and receiver during both uplink and downlink phases. The abstract does not state this as a model assumption, nor does it discuss its scope or limitations. If the untrusted nodes use hidden, random, or encrypted pilots, or if the transmit precoder is designed to null energy toward the monitoring nodes, the MMSE channel estimates and hence the derived SE expressions and optimized MSP values would lose their foundation. This precondition must be stated explicitly and addressed as a limitation or through robustness analysis.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Footer] The arXiv identifier in the footer does not match the identifier in the header; the authors should correct this to avoid ambiguity.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract would be more self-contained if it included a one-sentence summary of the system model assumptions, such as the number of MNs, the pilot knowledge at the MNs, and the channel model.
  3. [General] Once a readable manuscript is available, the authors should include error bars or confidence intervals for the numerical MSP claims, especially for the universal 'greater than 0.8' statement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the abstract-level derivation chain is self-contained and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The abstract describes an MMSE-based channel estimation scheme that uses pilot signals from the untrusted link, derives spectral efficiency expressions under stated CSI assumptions, and then optimizes the monitoring success probability via Bayesian optimization. Each of these is a forward construction: the SE expressions are derived from the estimated channels, and the MSP is an objective function that the optimization maximizes, not a quantity that is inserted as an input and then recovered as an output. There is no visible equation in the supplied material that reduces to its own input, no parameter fitted to a subset of data and then reported as a prediction, and no load-bearing self-citation chain. The claim that MSP exceeds 0.8 regardless of antenna count or precoding scheme is an empirical numerical assertion whose validity depends on the simulation grid and system model, but that is a verification or under-specification concern, not a circularity concern. The full text is an unreadable encoding dump, so no specific equation-level reduction can be quoted; consistent with the hard rule not to manufacture circularity, the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All ledger entries are inferred from the abstract; no equations or sections could be inspected because the supplied full text is unreadable. The main external burden is the assumption that untrusted nodes use observable pilots and that distributed monitoring nodes can estimate them with MMSE.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The untrusted transmitter and receiver transmit known pilot sequences in their uplink and downlink phases, and the monitoring nodes can observe these pilots.
    The proposed CSI acquisition scheme requires MNs to estimate effective channels from the untrusted link's pilots; if pilots are secret, absent, or not overheard, the MMSE estimation and all downstream results fail.
  • domain assumption The cell-free massive MIMO architecture provides fronthaul connectivity to a central processing unit with the two CSI availability cases studied.
    The SE derivations for case-1 and case-2 assume a CPU that either has imperfect CSI or no CSI; this is a system-level architectural assumption stated in the abstract.
  • standard math Standard MMSE estimation theory and standard massive MIMO spectral efficiency analysis are valid for the described system model.
    The derivations of SE expressions rely on established MMSE estimation and large-scale fading results, which are not re-derived in the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of How to Proactively Monitor Untrusted Communications with Cell-Free Massive MIMO?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UOCVYYBV

@misc{pith2026250803423,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: How to Proactively Monitor Untrusted Communications with Cell-Free Massive MIMO?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UOCVYYBV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.03423}
}
read the original abstract

This paper studies a cell-free massive multiple-input multiple-output (CF-mMIMO) proactive monitoring system in which multiple multi-antenna monitoring nodes (MNs) are assigned to either observe the transmissions from an untrusted transmitter (UT) or to jam the reception at the untrusted receiver (UR). We propose an effective channel state information (CSI) acquisition scheme for the monitoring system. In our approach, the MNs leverage the pilot signals transmitted during the uplink and downlink phases of the untrusted link and estimate the effective channels corresponding to the UT and UR via a minimum mean-squared error (MMSE) estimation scheme. We derive new spectral efficiency (SE) expressions for the untrusted link and the monitoring system. For the latter, the SE is derived for two CSI availability cases at the central processing unit (CPU); namely case-1: imperfect CSI knowledge at both MNs and CPU, case-2: imperfect CSI knowledge at the MNs and no CSI knowledge at the CPU. To improve the monitoring performance, we propose a novel joint mode assignment and jamming power control optimization method to maximize the monitoring success probability (MSP) based on the Bayesian optimization framework. Numerical results show that (a) our CF-mMIMO proactive monitoring system relying on the proposed CSI acquisition and optimization approach significantly outperforms the considered benchmarks; (b) the MSP performance of our CF-mMIMO proactive monitoring system is greater than 0.8, regardless of the number of antennas at the untrusted nodes or the precoding scheme for the untrusted transmission link.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    I. W. G. da Silva, Z. Mobini, H. Q. Ngo, and M. Matthaiou, `` CSI acquisition in cell-free massive MIMO surveillance systems,'' arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.03501, 2024

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Mitev, T

    M. Mitev, T. M. Pham, A. Chorti, A. N. Barreto, and G. Fettweis, ``Physical layer security—from theory to practice,'' IEEE BITS Inf. Theory Mag., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 67--79, June 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Mohammadi, Z

    M. Mohammadi, Z. Mobini, H. Q. Ngo, and M. Matthaiou, ``Next-generation multiple access with cell-free massive MIMO ,'' Proc. IEEE, vol. 112, no. 9, pp. 1372--1420, Sep. 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Mobini, M

    Z. Mobini, M. Mohammadi, and C. Tellambura, ``Wireless-powered full-duplex relay and friendly jamming for secure cooperative communications,'' IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 621--634, Mar. 2019

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Mukherjee and A

    A. Mukherjee and A. L. Swindlehurst, ``Robust beamforming for security in MIMO wiretap channels with imperfect CSI ,'' IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 351--361, Jan. 2011

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    J. Xu, L. Duan, and R. Zhang, ``Surveillance and intervention of infrastructure-free mobile communications: A new wireless security paradigm,'' IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 152--159, Aug. 2017

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    J. Moon, S. H. Lee, H. Lee, and I. Lee, ``Proactive eavesdropping with jamming and eavesdropping mode selection,'' IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 3726--3738, May 2019

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    A. D. Wyner, ``The wire-tap channel,'' The Bell Syst. Tech. J., vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 1355--1387, Oct. 1975

    work page 1975

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    J. Xu, L. Duan, and R. Zhang, ``Proactive eavesdropping via jamming for rate maximization over Rayleigh fading channels,'' IEEE Wireless Commun. Let., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 80--83, Feb. 2016

    2016

  2. [10]

    Wireless Commun., vol

    ------, ``Proactive eavesdropping via cognitive jamming in fading channels,'' IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 2790--2806, May 2017

    2017

  3. [11]

    Mobini, B

    Z. Mobini, B. K. Chalise, M. Mohammadi, H. A. Suraweera, and Z. Ding, ``Proactive eavesdropping using UAV systems with full-duplex ground terminals,'' in Proc. IEEE ICC, May 2018, pp. 1--6

    2018

  4. [12]

    D. Guo, L. Tang, X. Zhang, and Y.-C. Liang, ``Joint optimization of trajectory and jamming power for multiple UAV -aided proactive eavesdropping,'' IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 5770--5785, May 2024

    2024

  5. [13]

    Ge and P

    Y. Ge and P. C. Ching, ``Energy efficiency for proactive eavesdropping in cooperative cognitive radio networks,'' IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 9, no. 15, pp. 13\,443--13\,457, Aug. 2022

    2022

  6. [14]

    Z. Wang, Z. Mobini, H. Q. Ngo, and M. Matthaiou, ``Anti-malicious ISAC using proactive monitoring,'' arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.04408, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    M.-M. Zhao, Y. Cai, and R. Zhang, ``Intelligent reflecting surface aided wireless information surveillance,'' IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 1219--1234, Feb. 2023

    2023

  8. [16]

    Yao et al., ``Proactive monitoring via jamming in fluid antenna systems,'' IEEE Commun

    J. Yao et al., ``Proactive monitoring via jamming in fluid antenna systems,'' IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1698--1702, July 2024

    2024

  9. [17]

    Xu and H

    D. Xu and H. Zhu, ``Proactive eavesdropping for wireless information surveillance under suspicious communication quality-of-service constraint,'' IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 5220--5234, Jan. 2022

    2022

  10. [18]

    ------, ``Proactive eavesdropping of physical layer security aided suspicious communications in fading channels,'' IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur., vol. 18, pp. 1111--1126, Jan. 2023

    2023

  11. [19]

    Xu, ``Proactive eavesdropping of jamming-assisted suspicious communications in fading channels: A Stackelberg game approach,'' IEEE Trans

    D. Xu, ``Proactive eavesdropping of jamming-assisted suspicious communications in fading channels: A Stackelberg game approach,'' IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 2913--2928, May 2024

    2024

  12. [20]

    J. Chen, L. Tang, D. Guo, Y. Bai, L. Yang, and Y.-C. Liang, ``Proactive eavesdropping in massive MIMO-OFDM systems via deep reinforcement learning,'' IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 71, no. 11, pp. 12\,315--12\,320, Nov. 2022

    2022

  13. [21]

    Mobini, H

    Z. Mobini, H. Q. Ngo, M. Matthaiou, and L. Hanzo, ``Cell-free massive MIMO surveillance of multiple untrusted communication links,'' IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 11, no. 20, pp. 33\,010--33\,026, Oct. 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    Cheng et al., ``Covert surveillance via proactive eavesdropping under channel uncertainty,'' IEEE Trans

    Z. Cheng et al., ``Covert surveillance via proactive eavesdropping under channel uncertainty,'' IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 4024--4037, Mar. 2021

    2021

  15. [23]

    Zhang, X

    C. Zhang, X. Miao, Y. Huang, L. Yang, and L. Tang, ``Performance of multi-antenna proactive eavesdropping in 5G uplink systems,'' IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 6078--6091, Sep. 2023

    2023

  16. [24]

    G. Hu, F. Zhu, J. Si, Y. Cai, and N. Al-Dhahir, ``Proactive eavesdropping with jamming power allocation in training-based suspicious communications,'' IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 29, pp. 667--671, Feb. 2022

    2022

  17. [25]

    H. Q. Ngo, A. Ashikhmin, H. Yang, E. G. Larsson, and T. L. Marzetta, ``Cell-free massive MIMO versus small cells,'' IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1834--1850, Jan. 2017

    2017

  18. [26]

    Mohammadi, Z

    M. Mohammadi, Z. Mobini, H. Q. Ngo, and M. Matthaiou, ``Ten years of research advances in full-duplex massive MIMO ,'' IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 1756--1786, Mar. 2025

    2025

  19. [27]

    Wu, X.-Y

    J. Wu, X.-Y. Chen, H. Zhang, L.-D. Xiong, H. Lei, and S.-H. Deng, ``Hyperparameter optimization for machine learning models based on Bayesian optimization,'' J. Electron. Sci. Technol., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 26--40, Dec. 2019

    2019

  20. [28]

    Klein, S

    A. Klein, S. Falkner, S. Bartels, P. Hennig, and F. Hutter, ``Fast Bayesian optimization of machine learning hyperparameters on large datasets,'' in Proc. AISTATS, vol. 54, Apr. 2017, pp. 528--536. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v54/klein17a.html

    2017

  21. [29]

    H. Q. Ngo, E. G. Larsson, and T. L. Marzetta, ``Massive MU-MIMO downlink TDD systems with linear precoding and downlink pilots,'' in Proc. IEEE ALLERTON, Oct. 2013, pp. 293--298

    2013

  22. [30]

    T. M. Hoang, H. Q. Ngo, T. Q. Duong, H. D. Tuan, and A. Marshall, ``Cell-free massive MIMO networks: Optimal power control against active eavesdropping,'' IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 4724--4737, Oct. 2018

    2018

  23. [31]

    J. A. C. Sutton, H. Q. Ngo, and M. Matthaiou, ``Hardening the channels by precoder design in massive MIMO with multiple-antenna users,'' IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 4541--4556, May 2021

    2021

  24. [32]

    Björnson and L

    E. Björnson and L. Sanguinetti, ``Making cell-free massive MIMO competitive with MMSE processing and centralized implementation,'' IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 77--90, Jan. 2020

    2020

  25. [33]

    P. I. Frazier, ``A tutorial on Bayesian optimization,'' arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.02811, 2018

    2018 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Snoek, H

    J. Snoek, H. Larochelle, and R. P. Adams, ``Practical Bayesian optimization of machine learning algorithms,'' Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 25, 2012

    2012

  27. [35]

    Quinonero-Candela, C

    J. Quinonero-Candela, C. E. Rasmussen, and C. K. Williams, ``Approximation methods for Gaussian process regression,'' MIT Press, 2007

    2007

  28. [36]

    Shahriari, K

    B. Shahriari, K. Swersky, Z. Wang, R. P. Adams, and N. de Freitas, ``Taking the human out of the loop: A review of Bayesian optimization,'' Proc. IEEE, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 148--175, Jan. 2016

    2016

  29. [37]

    C. E. Rasmussen and C. K. I. Williams, Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning . 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4em The MIT Press, Nov. 2005. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001

    2005 doi

  30. [38]

    Garnett, Bayesian optimization

    R. Garnett, Bayesian optimization . 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4em Cambridge University Press, 2023

    2023

  31. [39]

    Hoffman, E

    M. Hoffman, E. Brochu, and N. De Freitas, ``Portfolio allocation for Bayesian optimization.'' in Proc. UAI, 2011, pp. 327--336

    2011

  32. [40]

    Snelson and Z

    E. Snelson and Z. Ghahramani, ``Sparse G aussian processes using pseudo-inputs,'' in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 18, 2005

    2005

  33. [41]

    L \'a zaro-Gredilla, J

    M. L \'a zaro-Gredilla, J. Quinonero-Candela, C. E. Rasmussen, and A. R. Figueiras-Vidal, ``Sparse spectrum Gaussian process regression,'' J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 11, no. 63, pp. 1865--1881, Oct. 2010

    2010

  34. [42]

    Mohammadi, Z

    M. Mohammadi, Z. Mobini, D. Galappaththige, and C. Tellambura, ``A comprehensive survey on full-duplex communication: Current solutions, future trends, and open issues,'' IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 2190--2244, Fourthquarter 2023

    2023

  35. [43]

    T. C. Mai, H. Q. Ngo, and T. Q. Duong, ``Downlink spectral efficiency of cell-free massive MIMO systems with multi-antenna users,'' IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 4803--4815, Apr. 2020

    2020

  36. [44]

    Yoo and A

    T. Yoo and A. Goldsmith, ``Capacity and power allocation for fading MIMO channels with channel estimation error,'' IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 2203--2214, Apr. 2006

    2006

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.