pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.04253 · v2 · submitted 2025-08-06 · 📡 eess.SP

Delay-Doppler Domain Signal Processing Aided OFDM (DD-a-OFDM) for 6G and Beyond

Yiyan Ma , Bo Ai , Jinhong Yuan , Shuangyang Li , Qingqing Cheng , Zhenguo Shi , Weijie Yuan , Zhiqiang Wei
show 5 more authors
Akram Shafie Guoyu Ma Yunlong Lu Mi Yang Zhangdui Zhong
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 01:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords OFDMDelay-DopplerChannel estimation6GHigh-mobilityOTFSInter-carrier interferenceCramér-Rao lower bound
0
0 comments X

The pith

DD-a-OFDM adds delay-Doppler channel estimation to standard OFDM to lower error rates in fast-moving channels.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces DD-a-OFDM, a scheme that keeps the familiar OFDM transmitter and receiver but adds signal processing in the delay-Doppler domain for better channel estimation. It uses discrete time-frequency pilots to estimate the channel in delay-Doppler space and shows that the interference from Doppler spread becomes Gaussian noise there. Closed-form bounds on estimation accuracy are derived, and practical estimators plus equalizers are built. Results indicate this approach beats plain OFDM on bit errors and does better than full OTFS systems at estimating channels while using fewer pilots. A sympathetic reader would care because it suggests a practical way to upgrade existing OFDM networks for 6G high-mobility use without full waveform replacement.

Core claim

The central claim is that by performing channel estimation in the delay-Doppler domain using time-frequency pilots and treating inter-carrier interference as Gaussian, DD-a-OFDM achieves superior bit-error-rate performance compared to classical OFDM while providing more accurate channel estimates than OTFS at lower pilot overhead, all while retaining the classical OFDM transceiver structure.

What carries the argument

Delay-Doppler domain channel estimation via discrete time-frequency pilots, which converts TF-domain ICI into DD-domain Gaussian interference for easier handling.

If this is right

  • DD-a-OFDM achieves lower bit-error rates than classical OFDM in high-mobility scenarios.
  • Channel estimation accuracy exceeds that of OTFS with reduced pilot overhead.
  • Closed-form CRLBs provide performance limits for the DD domain estimators.
  • The TF domain equalizer compensates for the estimated channel effectively.
  • The system maintains compatibility with existing OFDM hardware.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the Gaussian interference model holds, similar DD processing could be added to other multicarrier waveforms for mobility robustness.
  • Lower pilot overhead suggests potential gains in spectral efficiency for dense 6G deployments.
  • Testing in real-world channels with non-Gaussian effects would validate the interference transformation claim.
  • Integration with existing 5G OFDM infrastructure could accelerate adoption over full OTFS replacement.

Load-bearing premise

That discrete TF pilots enable accurate DD-domain channel estimation and that the TF-domain ICI behaves as Gaussian interference without major performance loss in practical channels.

What would settle it

A measurement in a real high-mobility channel where the bit-error rate of DD-a-OFDM does not drop below classical OFDM or where the channel estimation error exceeds the derived CRLB under the Gaussian assumption.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.04253 by Akram Shafie, Bo Ai, Guoyu Ma, Jinhong Yuan, Mi Yang, Qingqing Cheng, Shuangyang Li, Weijie Yuan, Yiyan Ma, Yunlong Lu, Zhangdui Zhong, Zhenguo Shi, Zhiqiang Wei.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Transmission Diagrams of: (a) Classical OFDM, (b) OT [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Pilot patterns in OFDM systems: (a) an example of CRS p [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: CSF estimation procedure based on discrete pilots in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: MSE performance of k1 in the DD-a-OFDM system under different channel estimators. where n˜ = ⌊ n dt ⌋, n ′ = mod(n, dt). After performing linear interpolation along the frequency domain similarly, the CTF corresponding to NM REs is obtained. 2) MMSE Estimation of CTF: Based on the principle of MMSE estimation, the estimated CTF will be obtained as [34]: vec(hˆTF)=R1(R2+σ 2 wE [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: BER performance of the DD-a-OFDM system compared to t [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Performance of CTF estimation with on-grid delays an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: BER performance of the DD-a-OFDM system compared to t [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

High-mobility scenarios will be a critical part of 6G systems. Since the widely deployed orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) waveform suffers from subcarrier orthogonality loss under severe Doppler spread, delay-Doppler domain multi-carrier (DDMC) modulation systems, such as orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS), have been extensively studied. While OTFS can exploit time-frequency (TF) domain channel diversity, it faces challenges including high receiver complexity and inflexible TF resource allocation, making OFDM still the most promising waveform for 6G. In this article, we propose a DD domain signal processing-aided OFDM (DD-a-OFDM) scheme to enhance OFDM performance based on DDMC research insights. First, we design a DD-a-OFDM system structure, retaining the classical OFDM transceiver while incorporating DD domain channel estimation and TF domain equalization. Second, we detail DD domain channel estimation using discrete TF pilots and prove that TF domain inter-carrier interference (ICI) could be transformed into DD domain Gaussian interference. Third, we derive closed-form Cram\'{e}r-Rao lower bounds (CRLBs) for DD domain channel estimation. Fourth, we develop maximum likelihood (ML) and peak detection-based channel estimators, along with a corresponding TF domain equalizer. Numerical results verify the proposed design, showing that DD-a-OFDM reduces the bit-error rate (BER) compared to classical OFDM and outperforms OTFS in channel estimation accuracy with lower pilot overhead.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes DD-a-OFDM, which augments classical OFDM with delay-Doppler domain signal processing for high-mobility 6G scenarios. It retains the standard OFDM transceiver while adding DD-domain channel estimation via discrete TF pilots, proves that TF-domain ICI transforms into DD-domain Gaussian interference, derives closed-form CRLBs for the channel estimates, develops ML and peak-detection estimators together with a TF-domain equalizer, and reports numerical results showing BER reduction versus classical OFDM plus improved channel-estimation accuracy over OTFS at lower pilot overhead.

Significance. If the TF-to-DD Gaussian-interference transformation holds under realistic conditions, the scheme offers a practical route to improve existing OFDM deployments for high mobility without replacing the waveform, easing 6G adoption. The closed-form CRLBs and explicit detector/equalizer designs are analytical strengths that support reproducible performance evaluation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Second contribution / DD domain channel estimation section] Second contribution (DD-domain channel estimation and ICI transformation): The claim that TF-domain ICI transforms exactly into additive Gaussian noise in the DD domain under the chosen pilot structure is load-bearing for both the CRLB derivations and the reported BER/channel-estimation gains. The derivation appears to rest on WSSUS statistics and the discrete TF pilot placement; it is not shown whether the Gaussian approximation remains accurate for non-WSSUS Doppler spectra or measured high-mobility traces, which directly affects the validity of the subsequent ML/peak detectors and the claimed lower pilot overhead.
  2. [CRLB and numerical results sections] CRLB derivation and numerical results: The closed-form CRLBs are obtained under the Gaussian-interference model; if that model is only approximate, the bounds may not be tight in practice. The numerical BER curves and OTFS comparisons should include an explicit stress test (e.g., non-Gaussian interference or measured channels) to confirm that the reported gains are not artifacts of the idealized transformation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that TF-domain ICI 'could be transformed' into Gaussian interference; the precise conditions (channel statistics, pilot density, Doppler spectrum) under which the transformation is exact should be stated explicitly.
  2. [Throughout] A consolidated table of notation for TF and DD variables would improve readability across the system model, estimation, and equalization sections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, clarifying the assumptions in our derivations and outlining the revisions we will make to strengthen the validation of the proposed DD-a-OFDM scheme.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Second contribution (DD-domain channel estimation and ICI transformation): The claim that TF-domain ICI transforms exactly into additive Gaussian noise in the DD domain under the chosen pilot structure is load-bearing for both the CRLB derivations and the reported BER/channel-estimation gains. The derivation appears to rest on WSSUS statistics and the discrete TF pilot placement; it is not shown whether the Gaussian approximation remains accurate for non-WSSUS Doppler spectra or measured high-mobility traces, which directly affects the validity of the subsequent ML/peak detectors and the claimed lower pilot overhead.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this important observation. Our proof that TF-domain ICI transforms into DD-domain Gaussian interference is derived under the standard wide-sense stationary uncorrelated scattering (WSSUS) channel model combined with the central limit theorem for a large number of subcarriers and the specific discrete TF pilot structure. This yields uncorrelated interference terms that are well-approximated as Gaussian. We acknowledge that the transformation is not exact outside WSSUS statistics. In the revised manuscript, we will add an explicit discussion subsection on the modeling assumptions and their limitations, and include new simulation results using a non-WSSUS Doppler spectrum (e.g., a Rician or Jakes model variant) to assess the robustness of the ML and peak-detection estimators as well as the resulting BER performance. This will be presented as a partial revision that clarifies rather than alters the core analytical contributions. revision: partial

  2. Referee: CRLB derivation and numerical results: The closed-form CRLBs are obtained under the Gaussian-interference model; if that model is only approximate, the bounds may not be tight in practice. The numerical BER curves and OTFS comparisons should include an explicit stress test (e.g., non-Gaussian interference or measured channels) to confirm that the reported gains are not artifacts of the idealized transformation.

    Authors: We agree that the CRLBs are derived under the Gaussian-interference model and that additional validation is valuable. In the revised version, we will expand the numerical results section to include explicit stress-test simulations that introduce controlled non-Gaussian interference (via alternative Doppler spectra) and compare the achieved mean-squared error of the channel estimators against the CRLB as well as the end-to-end BER. These results will be placed alongside the existing WSSUS curves and OTFS comparisons to demonstrate that the reported gains persist under more general conditions. While we do not possess proprietary measured high-mobility channel traces, the synthetic non-WSSUS tests will provide the requested robustness check. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; central claims rest on independent modeling and numerical verification

full rationale

The paper introduces a new DD-a-OFDM structure that retains classical OFDM transceivers while adding DD-domain processing. It claims to prove the TF-to-DD ICI transformation, derives closed-form CRLBs, and develops ML/peak-detection estimators plus a TF equalizer, all verified through numerical simulations showing BER and channel-estimation gains. These steps do not reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations; the Gaussian interference model is presented as a derived result under the paper's stated assumptions rather than an unverified premise imported from prior author work. No uniqueness theorems or ansatzes are smuggled via self-citation, and performance claims are externally falsifiable via the reported simulations rather than tautological.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The design rests on standard OFDM and DDMC channel models plus the new claim that ICI becomes Gaussian in DD domain. No new particles or forces are invented.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The wireless channel in high-mobility scenarios can be represented as a sparse delay-Doppler response that is constant over the frame.
    Invoked when designing DD domain channel estimation from TF pilots.
  • ad hoc to paper TF-domain inter-carrier interference transforms exactly into additive Gaussian noise in the DD domain under the chosen pilot structure.
    Central to the second contribution and the subsequent CRLB derivation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5846 in / 1343 out tokens · 43926 ms · 2026-05-19T01:07:22.255164+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    6G-enabled smart railways,

    B. Ai, Y . Lu, Y . Fang, D. Niyato, R. He, W. Chen, J. Zhang, G. Ma, Y . Niu, Z. Zhong, “6G-enabled smart railways,” arXiv: 2505.12 946, 2025

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    5G key tech nologies for smart railways,

    B. Ai, A. F. Molisch, M. Rupp, and Z.-D. Zhong, “5G key tech nologies for smart railways,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 856-893, Jun. 2020

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    From ground to sky: Architectur es, applications, and challenges shaping low-altitude wirele ss networks,

    W. Y uan, Y . Cui, J. Wang, F. Liu, G. Sun, T. Xiang, J. Xu, S. J in, D. Niyato, S. Coleri, S. Sun, S. Mao, A. Jamalipour, D. I. Kim, M.-S. Alouini, and X. Shen, “From ground to sky: Architectur es, applications, and challenges shaping low-altitude wirele ss networks,” arXiv: 2506.12308, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Sensing-enhanced handover criterion for low-alti tude wireless networks (LAWNs)

    J. Li, Y . Ma, B. Ai, Q. Cheng, G. Ma, M. Y ang, Y . Lu, W. Y ue, Z. Zhong, “Sensing-enhanced handover criterion for low-alti tude wireless networks (LAWNs).” arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.16350

    work page arXiv

  5. [5]

    OTFCS-modul ated waveform design for joint grant-free random access and posi tioning in C-V2X,

    Y . Ma, G. Ma, B. Ai, J. Liu, N. Wang, Z. Zhong, “OTFCS-modul ated waveform design for joint grant-free random access and posi tioning in C-V2X,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 103-119, Jan. 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Secure semantic communi cation via paired adversarial residual networks,

    B. He, F. Wang, and T. Q. S. Quek,“Secure semantic communi cation via paired adversarial residual networks,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 2832-2836, Oct. 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Anti-modulation-classification tran smitter design against deep learning approaches

    B. He and F. Wang, “Anti-modulation-classification tran smitter design against deep learning approaches”, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. , vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 6808-6823, July 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing: The way forward for 6G physical laye r design?

    M. S. J. Solaija, S. E. Zegrar, and H. Arslan, “Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing: The way forward for 6G physical laye r design?” IEEE V eh. Technol. Mag., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 45–54, Mar. 2024

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Vision aid ed channel prediction for vehicular communications: A case study of re ceived power prediction using RGB images

    X. Zhang, R. He, M. Y ang, Z. Zhang, Z. Qi, B. Ai, “Vision aid ed channel prediction for vehicular communications: A case study of re ceived power prediction using RGB images”, IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., early access, 2025, doi: 10.1109/TVT.2025.3579333

    work page doi:10.1109/tvt.2025.3579333 2025

  10. [10]

    N arrow- band channel measurements and statistical characterizati on in subway tunnels at 1.8 and 5.8 GHz

    X. Zhang, R. He, M. Y ang, Z. Qi, Z. Zhang, B. Ai, R. Chen, “N arrow- band channel measurements and statistical characterizati on in subway tunnels at 1.8 and 5.8 GHz”, IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 73, no. 7, pp. 10228-10240, Feb. 2024

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Channel measurements and modeling for dynamic vehicular I SAC scenarios at 28 GHz

    Z. Zhang, R. He, B. Ai, M. Y ang, X. Zhang, Z. Qi, Y . Y uan, “Channel measurements and modeling for dynamic vehicular I SAC scenarios at 28 GHz”, IEEE Trans. Commun , 2025, early access , doi: 10.1109/TCOMM.2025.3538851

    work page doi:10.1109/tcomm.2025.3538851 2025

  12. [12]

    A ge neral channel model for integrated sensing and communication sce narios,

    Z. Zhang, R. He, B. Ai, M. Y ang, C. Li, H. Mi, Z. Zhang, “A ge neral channel model for integrated sensing and communication sce narios,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 68–74, May 2023

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    Orthogonal time frequency space m odulation,

    R. Hadani, S. Rakib, M. Tsatsanis, A. Monk, A. J. Goldsmi th, A. F. Molisch, R. Calderbank, “Orthogonal time frequency space m odulation,” in Proc. IEEE WCNC , San Francisco, CA, USA, Mar. 2017, pp. 1-6

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    Orthogonal time-frequency space modulation: A pro mising next-generation waveform,

    Z. Wei, W. Y uan, S. Li, J. Y uan, G. Bharatula, R. Hadani, a nd L. Hanzo, “Orthogonal time-frequency space modulation: A pro mising next-generation waveform,” IEEE Wireless Commun. , vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 136–144, Aug. 2021

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    On the Doppler squin t effect in OTFS systems over doubly-dispersive channels: mo deling and evaluation,

    X. Wang, X. Shi, J. Wang and J. Song, “On the Doppler squin t effect in OTFS systems over doubly-dispersive channels: mo deling and evaluation,” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. , vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 8781- 8796, Dec. 2023

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    Orthogonal delay-Doppler division multiplexing modulation,

    H. Lin and J. Y uan, “Orthogonal delay-Doppler division multiplexing modulation,” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. , vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 11024- 11037, Dec. 2022

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Orthogon al delay- Doppler division multiplexing modulation with Tomlinson- Harashima precoding,

    Y . Ma, A. Shafie, J. Y uan, G. Ma, Z. Zhong, B. Ai, “Orthogon al delay- Doppler division multiplexing modulation with Tomlinson- Harashima precoding,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , early access , Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1109/TCOMM.2024.3519545

    work page doi:10.1109/tcomm.2024.3519545 2024

  18. [18]

    Fundamentals of delay-Doppler communications: Practical implementati on and exten- sions to OTFS,

    S. Li, P . Jung, W. Y uan, Z. Wei, J. Y uan, B. Bai, G. Caire, “Fundamentals of delay-Doppler communications: Practical implementati on and exten- sions to OTFS,” arXiv:2403.14192, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    OTFS-Predictability in the delay-Doppler domain and its v alue to communication and radar sensing,

    S. K. Mohammed, R. Hadani, A. Chockalingam, and R. Calde rbank, “OTFS-Predictability in the delay-Doppler domain and its v alue to communication and radar sensing,” IEEE BITS Inf. Theory Mag. , vol.3, no. 2, pp. 7–31, 2023

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    Embedded pilot-ai ded channel estimation for OTFS in delay-Doppler channels,

    P . Raviteja, K. T. Phan, and Y . Hong, “Embedded pilot-ai ded channel estimation for OTFS in delay-Doppler channels,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 4906–4917, May 2019

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    Off-grid c hannel estimation with sparse Bayesian learning for OTFS systems,

    Z. Wei, W. Y uan, S. Li, J. Y uan, and D. W. K. Ng, “Off-grid c hannel estimation with sparse Bayesian learning for OTFS systems, ” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 7407–7426, Sep. 2022

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Subspace-based estimation of rapidly varying mobile channels for OFDM systems,

    H. S ¸ enol and C. Tepedelenlioˇ glu, “Subspace-based estimation of rapidly varying mobile channels for OFDM systems,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 69, pp. 385-400, 2021

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    On the coexistence of OTFS modulation with OFDM-based communicat ion systems,

    A. Shafie, J. Y uan, P . Fitzpatrick, T. Sakurai, and Y . Fan g, “On the coexistence of OTFS modulation with OFDM-based communicat ion systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 72, no. 11, pp. 6822–6838, Nov. 2024

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Channel estima tion, interpola- tion and extrapolation in doubly-dispersive channels,

    Z. Gong, F. Jiang, Y . Song, C. Li, X. Tao, “Channel estima tion, interpola- tion and extrapolation in doubly-dispersive channels,” ar Xiv:2408.09381 [SP], Aug. 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Channel spreading function-ins pired channel transfer function estimation for OFDM systems with high- mobility,

    Y . Ma, B. Ai, G. Ma, A. Shafie, Q. Cheng, M. Y ang, J. Li, X. Pang, J. Y uan, Z. Zhong, “Channel spreading function-ins pired channel transfer function estimation for OFDM systems with high- mobility,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , 2024, early access, doi: 10.1109/LWC.2025.3565286

    work page doi:10.1109/lwc.2025.3565286 2024

  26. [26]

    Hlawatsch and G

    F. Hlawatsch and G. Matz, Wireless communications over rapidly time- varying channels , Academic press, 2011

    work page 2011

  27. [27]

    Cha r- acteristics of channel spreading function and performance of OTFS in high-speed railway,

    Y . Ma, G. Ma, B. Ai, D. Fei, N. Wang, Z. Zhong, J. Y uan, “Cha r- acteristics of channel spreading function and performance of OTFS in high-speed railway,” IEEE Trans. on Wirel. Commun. , vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 7038-7054, Oct. 2023

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Tse and P

    D. Tse and P . Viswanath, Fundamentals of Wireless Communication . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 45–50

    work page 2005

  29. [29]

    Rice, Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis , 2nd edition, Duxbury Press, 1995

    J. Rice, Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis , 2nd edition, Duxbury Press, 1995

    work page 1995

  30. [30]

    On the effective- ness of OTFS for joint radar parameter estimation and commun ication,

    L. Gaudio, M. Kobayashi, G. Caire, and G. Colavolpe, “On the effective- ness of OTFS for joint radar parameter estimation and commun ication,” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. , vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 5951–5965, Sep. 2020

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    OFDM Radar Algorithms in Mobile Communicati on Net- works,

    M. Braun, “OFDM Radar Algorithms in Mobile Communicati on Net- works,” Ph.D. Thesis at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology , 2014

    work page 2014

  32. [32]

    Deterministic pilot design and channel estimation for dow nlink massive MIMO-OTFS systems in presence of the fractional doppler,

    D. Shi, W. Wang, L. Y ou, X. Song, Y . Hong, X. Gao, and G. Fet tweis, “Deterministic pilot design and channel estimation for dow nlink massive MIMO-OTFS systems in presence of the fractional doppler,” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. , vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 7151-7165, 2021

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Data-driven modulation optimization with LMMSE equalization for reliability enha ncement in underwater acoustic communications,

    X. Wang, H. Zhang, J. Wang, Z. Sun and B. Ai, “Data-driven modulation optimization with LMMSE equalization for reliability enha ncement in underwater acoustic communications,” to appear in Proc. IE EE/CIC Int. Conf. Commun. China (ICCC), 2025

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Deep learning- based channel estimation,

    M. Soltani, V . Pourahmadi, A. Mirzaei, H. Sheikhzadeh, “Deep learning- based channel estimation,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 652–655, Apr. 2019

    work page 2019