Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 42 references

JVLA and VLBA study of the merging cool core CHIPS 1911+4455 at z~0.5: radio emission from an infant AGN and from a rapidly star-forming BCG

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A cluster's central black hole is caught switching on: the BCG in CHIPS 1911+4455 hosts a ~10^3-year-old radio AGN with 30 pc two-sided jets, while the kpc-scale radio whiskers are star-formation powered.

desk verdict Solid infant-AGN detection with a shakier star-forming whisker story; deserves a careful referee, not a desk reject. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.04778 v1 pith:E6LHZMM7 submitted 2025-08-06 astro-ph.GA

Francesco Ubertosi , Myriam Gitti , Pasquale Temi , Ewan O'Sullivan , Valeria Olivares , Gerrit Schellenberger , Fabrizio Brighenti , Marcello Giroletti This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords galaxyclusterscoolcoresAGNfeedbackGPSradiogalaxiesVLBAstarburstBCGmergingstarformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses new VLBA and JVLA radio observations to argue that the brightest cluster galaxy in the merging cool core cluster CHIPS 1911+4455 has just awakened its AGN. The parsec-scale images show a compact core with two-sided jets extending about 30 pc each, and the spectrum peaks at a rest-frame frequency of 1.93 GHz, signatures of a very young radio source. On 10 kpc scales, faint radio whiskers align with star-forming knots seen by HST and are interpreted as synchrotron from the starburst rather than AGN jets, implying a radio-derived star formation rate of 100–155 $M_\odot$/yr consistent with the optical value. If correct, this is a rare direct view of the onset of AGN feedback, linking low hot-gas entropy to the recent activation of the central supermassive black hole.

What carries the argument

The argument hinges on matching radio emission across scales: VLBA resolves the core and jets at 10–30 pc, while JVLA images the same source at 0.4–20 kpc. The near-total recovery of the JVLA flux in VLBA provides a compactness constraint that rules out a kpc-scale jet, and the peaked spectrum (with rest-frame peak 1.93 GHz) provides an age estimate. For the whiskers, the spectral index of $0.8\pm0.1$, the morphological alignment with HST [O II] star-forming knots, and the agreement between radio- and optical-derived SFRs are used to identify them as star-formation-powered synchrotron rather than AGN jets or fossil lobes.

What would settle it

Measure the spatially resolved spectral index across the southern whiskers: if it steepens from ~0.8 near the core to $\gtrsim1.5$ at the edges, the emission is aging jet or lobe plasma rather than in-situ star-formation synchrotron, which would predict a roughly uniform index. A second-epoch VLBA observation could also test the youth claim directly by detecting expansion or proper motion of the 30 pc jets.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central galaxy of CHIPS 1911+4455 has recently turned on its radio jets. VLBA imaging resolves a compact core with symmetric two-sided jets, each ~30 pc long; the L-band VLBA flux is 99.7% of the JVLA flux, showing that essentially all radio emission originates within parsec scales. The radio spectrum peaks at a rest-frame frequency of 1.93 GHz, typical of GigaHertz Peaked Spectrum radio galaxies with ages of ~$10^{3}$–$10^{4}$ yr. At larger scales, ~10 kpc southern radio whiskers coincide with star-forming knots in HST images and have a spectral index of $0.8\pm0.1$, consistent with supernova-driven synchrotron. The authors conclude that the AGN has just begun to respond to copious hot gas cool

Load-bearing premise

The southern radio whiskers are interpreted as star-formation synchrotron because they align with HST star-forming knots and have a spectral index of 0.8; if they are actually AGN jets or fossil lobes, the radio-derived star formation rate does not hold, although the infant-AGN detection would stand.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • CHIPS 1911+4455 becomes a candidate 'pre-feedback' cluster: the AGN is only ~10^3 yr old, and its hot gas entropy at $\lesssim10$ kpc is roughly 1.6 times lower than the average cool-core cluster, supporting the idea that low entropy triggers jet onset.
  • If the whiskers are star-formation synchrotron, then at z~0.5 the BCG sustains a star formation rate of ~100–190 $M_\odot$/yr even while its central black hole is just turning on, showing that star formation and jet activity can coexist at the same epoch.
  • The agreement between radio and optical SFRs implies that local $L_{1.4}$–SFR calibrations can be applied to a z~0.5 starburst BCG, a useful check for higher-redshift cluster studies.
  • The system may represent a distinct 'flavor' of pre-feedback cluster, where merger-induced turbulence or compression contributes to the cooling that triggers AGN activation, complementing cases where a prolonged pause in AGN activity is the cause.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the ~10^3 yr jet age holds, CHIPS 1911+4455 offers a live laboratory for testing jet-triggering thresholds: deeper X-ray observations could determine whether the central entropy deficit is a cause or a correlate of the radio activation.
  • The ~70-degree misalignment between the parsec-scale jet axis and the kpc-scale whiskers, if real, suggests that jet reorientation can occur within ~10^3 yr, a timescale that current pre-feedback evolution models do not yet explicitly include.
  • The whisker spectral index of 0.8 is also consistent with young, mildly re-accelerated fossil lobes; deeper low-frequency observations below 300 MHz could search for a spectral break that would distinguish in-situ star-formation acceleration from aged plasma.
  • A second-epoch VLBA observation, even a few years later, could test the youth claim directly: if the jets are expanding at ~0.1 c, their proper motion should be detectable at the mas scale.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents new JVLA (P/L/S band) and VLBA (L/C band) observations of the BCG of the merging cool-core cluster CHIPS 1911+4455 at z=0.485. The authors report a compact parsec-scale radio core with two-sided jets each extending about 30 pc, a peaked radio spectrum with rest-frame peak ~1.93 GHz, and a VLBA L-band flux that is quoted as 99.7% of the JVLA core flux. They interpret this as an infant AGN with a kinematic age of ~10^3 yr. On larger scales, JVLA imaging reveals faint southern 'whiskers' extending ~10 kpc that are aligned with HST star-forming knots; the whisker spectrum is fitted by a power law with alpha_w = 0.8 +/- 0.1, and the implied 1.4 GHz radio SFR is 100--155 Msun/yr, which the authors argue is consistent with the optical SFR of 140--190 Msun/yr. The paper concludes that CHIPS 1911+4455 is a transitional 'pre-feedback' system in which the AGN has just begun to respond to strong hot-gas cooling.

Significance. If correct, the infant-AGN detection is a rare, direct view of the onset of radio-loud AGN activity in a starburst BCG at z~0.5, and the multiscale JVLA/VLBA dataset is valuable. The paper contains several good practices: the 4.9 GHz VLBA flux is used as an independent check of the curved-spectrum model, noise levels and 10% flux-scale uncertainties are stated, and the authors are transparent about the spread among L_1.4--SFR calibrations. The strongest claim, the compact two-sided parsec-scale jet, is well supported by the VLBA imaging. The weakest link is the interpretation of the kiloparsec-scale whiskers as star-formation-powered synchrotron radiation; the evidence is largely morphological and the flux is a subtraction residual. Because the radio SFR and the 'pre-feedback transitional phase' narrative rest on this interpretation, the whisker origin needs a more careful, quantitative treatment before the paper can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4.1, argument (3)] The statement that 'if a jet launched from the central AGN and extending toward the southern whiskers was present, the JVLA flux density of the unresolved core at 1 GHz should exceed the VLBA one' is not a valid discriminator. The JVLA core flux is measured as the flux of the unresolved Gaussian component; a jet or lobe on 10-kpc scales would contribute to the extended 'whisker' component that is subtracted from the total, not necessarily to the fitted core. The 99.7% agreement between the VLBA flux and the JVLA core flux therefore only shows that the compact component is parsec-scale; it does not exclude an AGN jet powering the whiskers. Since this is one of four arguments against the AGN-jet scenario, and the remaining arguments are morphological/geometrical, the exclusion of an AGN origin is not as secure as claimed. Please remove or replace this argument with a quantitative test (e.g
  2. [Sec. 3.1 and Sec. 4.1] The whisker flux density and spectral index are derived from a subtraction residual using only two broadband frequencies (L and S band). The quoted alpha_w = 0.8 +/- 0.1 is therefore a two-point power law with unknown systematic errors from the subtraction method. The extrapolation of this power law to P band (2--4 mJy) is then subtracted from the P-band core measurements, and this corrected spectrum is used to determine the peak frequency (rest-frame 1.93 GHz) and the inferred SFR. The authors should provide a robustness test of the whisker measurement--for example, varying the 5-sigma threshold, using uv-tapered images, or fitting a two-component model--and report the resulting systematic uncertainty on alpha_w and on the core peak frequency. Without this, the SFR 100--155 Msun/yr and the rest-frame peak are not robust to the whisker model.
  3. [Sec. 4.1 (HST alignment)] The claimed 'striking alignment' between the radio whiskers and the HST star-forming knots is not quantified. This morphological match is the main positive evidence that the whiskers are star-formation-powered synchrotron emission, especially once argument (3) is removed. A quantitative test is needed--for example, the fraction of [O II]-selected knots enclosed by the 3-sigma radio contours compared with random placements, or a cross-correlation/centroid analysis. If such a test is not possible with the present data, the star-formation interpretation should be presented as a tentative hypothesis rather than a firm result, and the derived radio SFR should be explicitly flagged as model-dependent.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 1 vs. Sec. 2.2] The P-band observation date is given as 'January 18 and 23, 2025' in Sec. 2.2 but 'Jan. 18 & 25, 2025' in Table 1. Please reconcile.
  2. [Sec. 4.1, argument (1)] The statement that one-sidedness 'would imply that the radio galaxy is being seen nearly face-on' is imprecise. One-sidedness is more naturally a Doppler-beaming effect and can occur at moderate inclinations; if this argument is retained, it should be phrased in terms of beaming rather than face-on geometry.
  3. [Abstract and Sec. 4.1] The text quotes the radio SFR range as 100--155 Msun/yr, but the listed calibrations give 96 Msun/yr (Davies+17) as the lower bound. Clarify whether the 96 value is excluded for a stated reason or whether the reported range should be 96--155 Msun/yr.
  4. [Sec. 4.2] The entropy of CHIPS 1911+4455 is described as 'a factor ~1.6 lower' than the ACCEPT average and later as 'nearly a factor of 2'. Please make these statements consistent.
  5. [Sec. 3.1 / Sec. 4.1] The kinematic age of ~10^3 yr assumes a jet expansion speed of 0.1c. Since the age is a central part of the 'infant AGN' claim, report a plausible range of ages for 0.1c--0.5c and note the degeneracy with source orientation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: infant-AGN detection and radio SFR rest on independent observations and external calibrations; self-citations are interpretive context.

full rationale

The main claims do not reduce to their inputs. The infant-AGN detection is based on direct VLBA imaging (a ~30 pc core with two-sided jets) and on the comparison between VLBA and JVLA flux densities measured independently. The peaked-spectrum model is fitted to JVLA core points; the 4.9 GHz check uses the VLBA C-band point, which is not part of that fit, and the 1.6 GHz agreement is between two independent arrays. The radio SFR of the whiskers is obtained by applying external L1.4-SFR calibrations (Condon 1992; Davies et al. 2017; Gurkan et al. 2018; Cook et al. 2024) to a measured whisker flux, and the optical/infrared SFR comes from independent prior work (Somboonpanyakul et al. 2021b). The whisker flux is a subtraction residual, but that affects measurement robustness, not circularity: the residual is not a fitted parameter that is later relabeled as a prediction. The pre-feedback classification invokes Ubertosi et al. (2023) and White et al. (2025), which include overlapping authors, but it is not load-bearing in a circular sense: the paper supplies its own radio evidence of a young core and uses independent Chandra entropy data for the comparison. No uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors, and no equation-level identity between inputs and outputs is present. The paper itself flags limitations (e.g., neglecting the inner 1'' star-forming contribution, Sec. 4.1; the forthcoming extended sample, Sec. 4.2), and those are acknowledged uncertainties rather than circular steps. Overall the derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks, so the circularity score is 1 rather than 0 only because self-citations are used as interpretive framing for the 'pre-feedback' narrative.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The claims rest on standard radio-astronomy practice plus several domain assumptions: the local L_1.4-SFR calibration applies at z=0.485, the GPS interpretation of the compact source (rather than a frustrated source), the reliability of the prior Chandra entropy profile, and the Jaffe-Perola injection index used to exclude fossil lobes. Free parameters are the assumed jet speed for the age, the fitted spectral peak defining the GPS turnover, the fitted whisker spectral index used for extrapolation, and the choice among four external SFR calibrations. No new physical entities are introduced; 'pre-feedback' is an interpretive category from Ubertosi et al. 2023.

free parameters (4)
  • Jet expansion speed = 0.1 c (assumed, not measured)
    Assumed in Sec 4.1 to convert the 30 pc jet extent into a kinematic age of ~10^3 yr; the age scales inversely with this value and no uncertainty is propagated.
  • Spectral peak frequency of the core (GPS turnover) = 1.3 GHz (1.93 GHz rest frame)
    Free parameter of the curved-spectrum fit to the JVLA core and subtracted P-band points (Sec 3.1); the young-AGN classification depends on this fitted turnover.
  • Whisker spectral index alpha_w = 0.8 ± 0.1 (power-law fit)
    Fitted to whisker flux densities (Sec 3.1) and extrapolated to 300-400 MHz to subtract whisker contribution from P-band core points; the GPS turnover partly depends on this extrapolation.
  • Choice of L_1.4-SFR calibration = 96 to 155 M_sun/yr depending on relation
    Four external calibrations (Condon 1992; Davies 2017; Gurkan 2018; Cook 2024) give SFRs spanning a factor 1.6; the quoted radio SFR range is the spread of this choice, not a statistical error.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Flat Lambda-CDM cosmology with H0=70 km/s/Mpc and Omega_m=0.3, giving 6 kpc/arcsec at z=0.485
    Stated in the Introduction; all angular-to-physical scale conversions and luminosities depend on it.
  • domain assumption Low-frequency radio synchrotron from star-forming regions is dominated by supernova-accelerated electrons with alpha~0.8, and the local L_1.4-SFR relations hold at z~0.5
    Sec 4.1; the radio SFR of the whiskers (100-155 M_sun/yr) assumes these local calibrations apply to this redshift and that the whisker emission is star-formation-powered.
  • domain assumption A compact two-sided ~60 pc radio source with a spectral turnover is a young AGN (GPS interpretation) rather than a confined 'frustrated' source
    Sec 4.1; the 'recently awakened' claim adopts the standard youth reading of GPS sources and does not discuss the frustration alternative.
  • domain assumption The Chandra-based entropy and cooling time measurements of Somboonpanyakul et al. 2021b are reliable at the factor ~1.6-2 level used for comparison
    Sec 4.2; the pre-feedback classification leans on the claim that entropy at <=10 kpc is ~1.6 times lower than the ACCEPT cool-core average, taken from the prior X-ray study.
  • domain assumption The injection spectral index range alpha_inj=0.5-0.7 (Jaffe and Perola 1973) is the correct benchmark for distinguishing fresh from aged electron populations
    Sec 4.1; the exclusion of the fossil-lobe scenario rests on comparing alpha_w=0.8 to this assumed injection range.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of JVLA and VLBA study of the merging cool core CHIPS 1911+4455 at z~0.5: radio emission from an infant AGN and from a rapidly star-forming BCG." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/E6LHZMM7

@misc{pith2026250804778,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: JVLA and VLBA study of the merging cool core CHIPS 1911+4455 at z~0.5: radio emission from an infant AGN and from a rapidly star-forming BCG},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/E6LHZMM7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.04778}
}
abstract

Recent studies of galaxy clusters found peculiar cases at the boundary between non-cool core and cool core systems. While unusual, these objects can help us understand the evolution of the most massive clusters. We investigated the role of active galactic nucleus (AGN) feedback in the starburst brightest cluster galaxy (BCG) of the merging cool core cluster CHIPS 1911+4455 (z = 0.485). We conducted new multifrequency (0.3 - 5 GHz) Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) and Jansky Very Large Array (JVLA) observations of CHIPS 1911+4455 across a wide range of scales (0.01 to 20 kpc). Our analysis reveals that the AGN in the BCG has recently awakened, showing a compact core with symmetric, ~30 pc long jets in VLBA data. The onset of the AGN may be linked to the enhanced cooling of the hot gas found in a previous study. At larger scales (10 kpc), faint radio whiskers extending to the south show a striking alignment with star-forming knots and are thus interpreted as synchrotron-emitting regions associated with the starburst BCG. The implied radio star formation rate of 100 - 155 M$_{\odot}$/yr agrees with the optical/infrared one (140 - 190 M$_{\odot}$/yr). Our JVLA and VLBA radio study, informed by previous X-ray/optical/millimeter works, indicates that CHIPS 1911+4455 represents a transitional phase in cluster evolution, where the AGN in the central galaxy has just begun to respond to copious hot gas cooling.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.04778 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Multi-wavelength view of CHIPS 1911+4455. Left: Large-scale composite image from archival data (blue from Chandra, white from HST). The white box shows the extent of the top right panel. Right: JVLA image at L band (top) and VLBA image at C band (bottom) of the BCG in CHIPS 1911+4455 from the new data presented in this work. Contours are drawn at 5×σrms and increase by a factor of 2 (see Sec. 2 for details), and the… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Radio synchrotron sources in CHIPS 1911+4455. Left: JVLA and VLBA spectra of the radio core and the whiskers in CHIPS 1911+4455. Best-fit models to the spectra are overlaid as dashed-dotted (whiskers), dashed (radio core), and solid (total) lines (see Section 3.1). Right: HST F550M (sensitive to blue continuum and [O II] lines) image of the star-forming regions in the BCG with overlaid L-band contours (same as in [… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. New radio images of the BCG in CHIPS 1911+4455. Top left: JVLA image at P band (centered at 370 MHz; rms noise of 0.6 mJy/beam, beam FWHM 12”×5”, position angle −60◦ ), with a white square showing the field of view of the JVLA L band and S band images shown in the top center and right panels; Top center: JVLA image at L band (centered at 1.5 GHz; rms noise of 15 µJy/beam, beam FWHM 0.9”×0.8”, position angle 38◦ ); T… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    - [1] #1 = = ^ ^ ^ .\!\!^ d .\!\!^ h .\!\!^ m .\!\!^ s .\!\!^ @mss

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt \@twocolumntrue 12pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key o...

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    R., et al

    Andrade-Santos , F., Jones , C., Forman , W. R., et al. 2017, , 843, 76, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7461

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa7461 2017

  3. [3]

    2018, , 476, 5591, 10.1093/mnras/sty598

    Botteon , A., Gastaldello , F., & Brunetti , G. 2018, , 476, 5591, 10.1093/mnras/sty598

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty598 2018

  4. [4]

    2022, , 661, A92, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142579

    Brienza , M., Lovisari , L., Rajpurohit , K., et al. 2022, , 661, A92, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142579

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142579 2022

  5. [5]

    O., Hallman , E

    Burns , J. O., Hallman , E. J., Gantner , B., Motl , P. M., & Norman , M. L. 2008, , 675, 1125, 10.1086/526514

    doi:10.1086/526514 2008

  6. [6]

    2013, in Secular Evolution of Galaxies, ed

    Calzetti , D. 2013, in Secular Evolution of Galaxies, ed. J. Falc \'o n-Barroso & J. H. Knapen , 419, 10.48550/arXiv.1208.2997

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1208.2997 2013

  7. [7]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.20538

    Castignani , G., Combes , F., Salom \'e , P., Edge , A., & Jablonka , P. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.20538. 2504.20538

    arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    W., Donahue , M., Voit , G

    Cavagnolo , K. W., Donahue , M., Voit , G. M., & Sun , M. 2009, , 182, 12, 10.1088/0067-0049/182/1/12

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/1/12 2009

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    Condon , J. J. 1992, , 30, 575, 10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.003043

    1992

  2. [10]

    Cook , R. H. W., Davies , L. J. M., Rhee , J., et al. 2024, , 531, 708, 10.1093/mnras/stae1215

    2024 doi

  3. [11]

    Davies , L. J. M., Huynh , M. T., Hopkins , A. M., et al. 2017, , 466, 2312, 10.1093/mnras/stw3080

    2017 doi

  4. [12]

    T., et al

    Delvecchio , I., Daddi , E., Sargent , M. T., et al. 2021, , 647, A123, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039647

    2021 doi

  5. [13]

    Donahue , M., & Voit , G. M. 2022, , 973, 1, 10.1016/j.physrep.2022.04.005

    2022 doi

  6. [14]

    2013, Astronomische Nachrichten, 334, 394, 10.1002/asna.201211865

    Gaspari , M., Brighenti , F., & Ruszkowski , M. 2013, Astronomische Nachrichten, 334, 394, 10.1002/asna.201211865

    2013 doi

  7. [15]

    2009, Astronomische Nachrichten, 330, 193, 10.1002/asna.200811154

    Giroletti , M., & Polatidis , A. 2009, Astronomische Nachrichten, 330, 193, 10.1002/asna.200811154

    2009 doi

  8. [16]

    2025, , 697, A72, 10.1051/0004-6361/202453450

    Gitti , M., Bonafede , A., Brighenti , F., et al. 2025, , 697, A72, 10.1051/0004-6361/202453450

    2025 doi

  9. [17]

    2004, , 605, 695, 10.1086/382674

    Govoni , F., Markevitch , M., Vikhlinin , A., et al. 2004, , 605, 695, 10.1086/382674

    2004 doi

  10. [18]

    J., Smith , D

    G \"u rkan , G., Hardcastle , M. J., Smith , D. J. B., et al. 2018, , 475, 3010, 10.1093/mnras/sty016

    2018 doi

  11. [19]

    S., Mittal , R., Reiprich , T

    Hudson , D. S., Mittal , R., Reiprich , T. H., et al. 2010, , 513, A37, 10.1051/0004-6361/200912377

    2010 doi

  12. [20]

    J., & Perola , G

    Jaffe , W. J., & Perola , G. C. 1973, , 26, 423

    1973

  13. [21]

    2018, , 611, A55, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731673

    Klein , U., Lisenfeld , U., & Verley , S. 2018, , 611, A55, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731673

    2018 doi

  14. [22]

    A., Parma , P., de Ruiter , H

    Laing , R. A., Parma , P., de Ruiter , H. R., & Fanti , R. 1999, , 306, 513, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02548.x

    1999

  15. [23]

    B., Allen , S

    Mantz , A. B., Allen , S. W., Morris , R. G., et al. 2015, , 449, 199, 10.1093/mnras/stv219

    2015 doi

  16. [24]

    R., & Tremblay , G

    McDonald , M., Gaspari , M., McNamara , B. R., & Tremblay , G. R. 2018, , 858, 45, 10.3847/1538-4357/aabace

    2018 doi

  17. [25]

    2016, , 817, 86, 10.3847/0004-637X/817/2/86

    McDonald , M., Stalder , B., Bayliss , M., et al. 2016, , 817, 86, 10.3847/0004-637X/817/2/86

    2016 doi

  18. [26]

    R., & Nulsen , P

    McNamara , B. R., & Nulsen , P. E. J. 2007, , 45, 117, 10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110625

    2007 arXiv

  19. [27]

    2012, New Journal of Physics, 14, 055023, 10.1088/1367-2630/14/5/055023

    ---. 2012, New Journal of Physics, 14, 055023, 10.1088/1367-2630/14/5/055023

    2012 doi

  20. [28]

    2023, , 670, A104, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243421

    Molendi , S., De Grandi , S., Rossetti , M., et al. 2023, , 670, A104, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243421

    2023 doi

  21. [29]

    2001, , 560, 194, 10.1086/322387

    Molendi , S., & Pizzolato , F. 2001, , 560, 194, 10.1086/322387

    2001 doi

  22. [30]

    J., & Readhead , A

    Pearson , T. J., & Readhead , A. C. S. 1988, , 328, 114, 10.1086/166274

    1988 doi

  23. [31]

    2015, , 813, L17, 10.1088/2041-8205/813/1/L17

    Rasia , E., Borgani , S., Murante , G., et al. 2015, , 813, L17, 10.1088/2041-8205/813/1/L17

    2015 doi

  24. [32]

    M., et al

    Rossetti , M., Eckert , D., Cavalleri , B. M., et al. 2011, , 532, A123, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117306

    2011 doi

  25. [33]

    2010, , 510, A83, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913156

    Rossetti , M., & Molendi , S. 2010, , 510, A83, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913156

    2010 doi

  26. [34]

    Sadler , E. M. 2016, Astronomische Nachrichten, 337, 105, 10.1002/asna.201512274

    2016 doi

  27. [35]

    Sarazin , C. L. 2002, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 272, Merging Processes in Galaxy Clusters, ed. L. Feretti , I. M. Gioia , & G. Giovannini , 1--38, 10.1007/0-306-48096-4_1

    2002 doi

  28. [36]

    B., Roy , A

    Slee , O. B., Roy , A. L., Murgia , M., Andernach , H., & Ehle , M. 2001, , 122, 1172, 10.1086/322105

    2001 doi

  29. [37]

    Somboonpanyakul , T., McDonald , M., Gaspari , M., Stalder , B., & Stark , A. A. 2021 a , , 910, 60, 10.3847/1538-4357/abe1bc

    2021 doi

  30. [38]

    2021 b , , 907, L12, 10.3847/2041-8213/abd540

    Somboonpanyakul , T., McDonald , M., Bayliss , M., et al. 2021 b , , 907, L12, 10.3847/2041-8213/abd540

    2021 doi

  31. [39]

    2023, , 673, A52, 10.1051/0004-6361/202345894

    Ubertosi , F., Gitti , M., Brighenti , F., et al. 2023, , 673, A52, 10.1051/0004-6361/202345894

    2023 doi

  32. [40]

    Voit , G. M. 2018, , 868, 102, 10.3847/1538-4357/aae8e2

    2018 doi

  33. [41]

    M., Donahue , M., Bryan , G

    Voit , G. M., Donahue , M., Bryan , G. L., & McDonald , M. 2015, , 519, 203, 10.1038/nature14167

    2015 doi

  34. [42]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.03277, 10.48550/arXiv.2506.03277

    White , L., McDonald , M., Ubertosi , F., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.03277, 10.48550/arXiv.2506.03277

    2025 doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.