Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 68 references

A refined twist on Hurwitz numbers

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A two-parameter refined Jucys–Murphy action interpolates between Schur and zonal Hurwitz theories and, conjecturally, yields the tropical and polynomial structure of $b$-Hurwitz numbers.

desk verdict A genuinely new two-parameter Jucys–Murphy formalism with real checks, but the advertised Jack/b-Hurwitz unification is explicitly deferred, so the headline applications are conditional on an unproved spectral identification. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.06188 v1 pith:YYNDPZOX submitted 2025-08-08 math.CO math.AGmath.GTmath.RT

Raphaël Fesler , Marvin Anas Hahn , Maksim Karev , Hannah Markwig This is my paper
classification math.COmath.AGmath.GTmath.RT MSC 05E1014T1505A1557M12
keywords HurwitznumbersJucys-Murphyelementsb-HurwitzJackfunctionszonalactiontropicalcoverspiecewisepolynomialitysymmetric
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces a two-parameter family of Jucys–Murphy operators, the $CJT$-refinement, acting on the Fock space spanned by type indicators of fixed-point-free involutions. The action is proved for all parameter values (Theorem 3.5), recovers the Schur action at $CJ=1/2, T=0$ and the zonal action at $CJ=T=1$, and is conjectured to give the Jack action at $CJ=(1+b)/2, T=b$. On the strength of the refined cut-and-join recursions, the paper derives a tropical count of $b$-Hurwitz numbers and proves that $(1+b)h_g^{(b)}$ is a polynomial in $b$ whose coefficients are piecewise polynomial in the ramification profiles. A sympathetic reader would care because the same representation-theoretic machine would then control complex, purely real, and Jack-deformed Hurwitz enumeration, including structural results previously out of reach.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the $CJT$-refined odd Jucys–Murphy element $X_k = \sum_{i<k}\big(\widehat{(i k)} + \widehat{(\bar i k)}\big)$ acting on fixed-point-free involutions $\rho$, where $\widehat{(i j)}$ is weighted by $C$ (cut), $J$ (join), or $T$ (twist) according to how $(i j)$ changes the cycles of $\rho\tau$ with $\tau=(1\bar1)\cdots(n\bar n)$. The commutation relations $[T_k,Q_l]=0$ and $CJ[T_k,T_l]+T^2[Q_k,Q_l]=0$ make the family act as symmetric functions on type indicators, and the same cut/join/twist decomposition generates the cut-and-join recursions and the tropical vertex multiplicities throughout the paper.

What would settle it

Compute the spectrum of the refined Laplace–Beltrami operator (equation (11)) at $CJ=(1+b)/2,T=b$ on the type-indicator basis for $n=3$; the eigenvalues must coincide with Jack contents $(b+1)(x-1)-(y-1)$ of the boxes of the corresponding partitions, up to the rescaling given in Remark 4.14. Any mismatch would disprove the conjectured Jack identification.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the cut-join-twist trichotomy for transpositions acting on fixed-point-free involutions can be promoted to an action of the ring of symmetric functions: assigning weight $C$ to a cut, $J$ to a join, and $T$ to a twist, the refined odd Jucys–Murphy elements $X_k$ commute on the subspace $I(C,J,T)$ spanned by type indicators. This yields a representation of the symmetric-function ring (Theorem 3.5) that is self-adjoint for a refined inner product (Theorem 4.11) and whose monotone Hurwitz structure coefficients obey a closed recursion. The same recursion specializes to the zonal numbers at $CJ=T=1$ and to the Schur numbers at $CJ=1/2,T=0$ (Theorem 4.12). For the co

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that at the specialization $CJ=(1+b)/2, T=b$ the refined operators have exactly the Jack-function spectrum; the paper defers this spectral proof and supports it only by matching known recursions in the double simple and single monotone cases.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Schur and zonal Hurwitz theories become two specializations of one family, so recursions and operator arguments transfer between the complex and purely real settings.
  • Double $b$-Hurwitz numbers are computed as weighted counts of twisted tropical covers, with branch multiplicities $b(\omega_V-1)$ at 2-valent vertices and $1$ or $1+b$ elsewhere; $b=0$ and $b=1$ recover the classical and twisted tropical counts.
  • $(1+b)h_g^{(b)}$ is a polynomial in $b$ with coefficients piecewise polynomial of degree $2g-1+\ell(\mu)+\ell(\nu)$ on the resonance arrangement; the prefactor is genuinely needed.
  • Single monotone $b$-Hurwitz numbers admit an analogous tropical count using equivalence classes of quotient covers.
  • For general $C,J,T$, refined monotone Hurwitz numbers have a tropical interpretation and are piecewise quasipolynomial with respect to a finer hyperplane arrangement.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the deferred spectrum computation is carried out, the same formalism would supply centrality for all Jack-weighted Hurwitz numbers, extending the property that made classical tropicalization work beyond the checked cases.
  • Since the tropical graphs for $b$-Hurwitz numbers are unchanged from the purely real case and only local multiplicities carry $b$, wall-crossing phenomena for double Hurwitz numbers should admit $b$-deformed analogues on the same resonance arrangement.
  • The extra hyperplanes in the refined monotone quasipolynomiality may be an artifact of the tropical proof rather than the true chamber structure, mirroring the classical monotone situation; a Fock-space proof could plausibly recover the resonance arrangement.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a two-parameter (CJ,T) deformation of the odd Jucys–Murphy/zonal action on the Fock space of type indicators, weighting cuts, joins, and twists by C, J, and T. It proves (Theorem 3.5) that this deformed family gives an action of the ring of symmetric functions, self-adjointness with respect to a refined inner product (Theorem 4.11), and specializations to the Schur action (CJ=1/2, T=0) and the zonal action (CJ=T=1) (Theorem 4.12). For the specialization CJ=(1+b)/2, T=b the action is conjectured to give the Jack action; the paper explicitly states (Remarks 4.14, 4.15) that the full identification of the spectrum is not proved in this work. Using recursions matched to known results of Chapuy–Dołęga and Bonzom–Chapuy–Dołęga, the authors derive cut-and-join recursions, a tropical interpretation of the resulting b-deformed Hurwitz numbers (Theorem 5.9), a piecewise polynomiality result (Theorem 5.10), and a tropicalization of refined monotone Hurwitz numbers (Theorem 6.9).

Significance. The construction is substantial and explicitly presented, with no fitted parameters or circular use of external results: the small-n computations in Appendix A, the Schur/zonal specializations, and the matching of recursions with [18] and [6] are genuine independent checks. If the missing Jack-spectrum identification is eventually proven, the framework would unify Schur, zonal, and Jack actions and give the first proof of the full Chapuy–Dołęga polynomiality statement. The paper is honest that the Jack specialization is conjectural, but the advertised resolution of the open problem is conditionally stated in a way that the current manuscript does not fully justify.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.2–5.3, Theorem 5.10; Remarks 4.14–4.15] The main application—resolving Chapuy–Dołęga's open problem on piecewise polynomiality of b-Hurwitz numbers—is load-bearing on an unproved identification. The numbers h^(b) in Theorem 5.3 and 5.10 are defined by specializing the CJT-refined recursions, while the b-Hurwitz numbers of [18] are defined via Jack functions. The equality between the two families is asserted only for the special cases of double simple and single monotone b-Hurwitz numbers, by matching recursions from [18] and [6]. Remark 4.15 explicitly says that proving coincidence of the spectrum is a separate publication. Consequently, Theorem 5.10, as stated, answers the open problem only conditional on that identification. The authors should either prove the Jack-spectrum statement (at least for the weights needed here) or rephrase the abstract/introduction and Theorems 5.9–5.10 as results about the refined specializations
  2. [§3, proof of Theorem 3.5 (pp. 28–32)] The proof that the refined Jucys–Murphy elements define an action of the ring of symmetric functions is the foundation of the entire paper. The proof contains a long case analysis in which several essential steps are summarized as 'similar' or 'the rest are done similarly', and the non-overlap of cases is checked only by a single example (p. 32). Since the centrality of the higher elementary symmetric functions e_l(X2,...,Xn) is used to define the Hurwitz numbers, the authors should give a complete verification of the missing cases, provide a computer-assisted check, or restructure the argument so that the listed cases are exhaustive and verifiable from the displayed cycle diagrams.
  3. [§4, Proposition 4.6 and Lemma 4.10] The displayed equality in Proposition 4.6 uses denominators ∏(2j C)^{m_j} m_j! and J^{-l(ν)}Dν, while the refined inner product introduced immediately before has denominators ∏(2j CJ)^{m_j} m_j!. It would help the reader to spell out the exact convention for the modified Jucys–Murphy elements X_k and the role of the J factors; as written, the equality is not a direct transcription of the displayed inner product and thus the self-adjointness proof in Theorem 4.11 is harder to follow. This is a presentation issue, but it concerns a central technical step and deserves clarification.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and §1.7] The abstract says the paper gives 'a partial resolution' of the Coulter–Do conjecture and 'answering an open problem' of Chapuy–Dołęga. Given Remark 4.15, the second phrase should be qualified as conditional or the claim restricted to the refined specializations.
  2. [Throughout] There are numerous typos, e.g. 'tropialisations' (p. 40), 'expancion' (p. 4), 'Jucyc-Murphy' (Appendix A title), and inconsistent comma/period conventions in displayed equations. A careful proofreading pass is needed.
  3. [Definition 6.6] The multiplicity m(π) is defined with a square root of the product of edge weights and vertex multiplicities. The authors should explain why this expression is a well-defined (nonnegative) rational/integer and how the square root is consistent with the involutive edge-pairing.
  4. [Theorem 4.9] The displayed recursion contains unbalanced braces and ambiguous summation indices (e.g. in the third and fourth summands). Please correct the display so that the reader can parse the essential-join term without reconstructing it from the surrounding text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No meaningful circularity: CJT action is built from scratch and benchmarked against Schur/zonal; the Jack-specialization gap is deferred, not derived from its own conclusion.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained at the level of the CJT-refined action. Definition 3.1 introduces CJT weights and the refined Jucys-Murphy elements from fixed-point-free involutions; Proposition 3.4 and Theorem 3.5 prove commutativity and the action of the ring of symmetric functions by an internal combinatorial argument; Theorem 4.11 proves self-adjointness from the monotone cut-and-join recursion; Theorem 4.12 specializes to the zonal action (CJ=T=1) and to the Schur action (CJ=1/2,T=0), with those specializations benchmarked against the classical actions. No parameter is fitted to data, and no 'prediction' is read back from the quantity it defines. The b-Hurwitz applications are not circular either: Theorem 5.3 states a recursion for the refined numbers specialized at CJ=(1+b)/2,T=b and identifies it as a rephrasing of [18, Theorem 6.5]; Theorem 5.9 proves the tropical count equals this specialization by induction on the same recursion; Theorem 5.10 derives piecewise polynomiality from the tropical graph sum. The link to the Jack-defined b-Hurwitz numbers of [18] is genuinely incomplete: Remark 4.14 asserts the eigenvectors are rescaled Jack functions without proof, and Remark 4.15 states that proving the coincidence of the spectrum is deferred to a separate publication. That is a gap in the advertised resolution of the Chapuy–Dołęga open problem, and a correctness risk, but it is not circularity: the paper does not define the b-numbers as its own output and then 'predict' them; for the cases treated, it matches recursions from independent sources [18, 6]. The self-citations [44, 43] supply definitions and the b=1 specialization, but the arbitrary-b argument does not reduce to those papers. Hence no step satisfies the quoted-reduction test for circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central construction relies on standard symmetric function theory, Matsumoto's odd Jucys-Murphy formalism, and the external recursions of Chapuy-Dołęga for b-Hurwitz numbers. The only new free objects are the formal C,J,T weights; there is no empirical fitting. The main unverified input is the conjectural equality of the refined action at CJ=(1+b)/2,T=b with the Jack action, which the paper explicitly defers.

free parameters (1)
  • C,J,T deformation parameters = formal; specializations CJ=1/2,T=0; CJ=1,T=1; CJ=(1+b)/2,T=b
    Introduced by definition as weights for cuts, joins and twists. They are not fitted to data, but they are chosen ad hoc to interpolate between known Schur and zonal actions and conjecturally to reach the Jack action.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Jucys-Murphy theorem: for symmetric F, F(X_1,...,X_n) is central in C[S_n]
    Used in Section 2.3, Theorem 2.5, to define the Schur action and weighted complex Hurwitz numbers.
  • domain assumption Matsumoto's odd Jucys-Murphy and zonal action facts (Propositions 2.15, 2.16, 2.21)
    The starting point for the CJT refinement; cited from [57] and used throughout Section 2.4.
  • domain assumption The algebra End(M_n) is the Hecke algebra for (S_{2n},H_n) and is generated by operators of the form F(X)
    Used in Section 2.4, via [1] and [57], to realize the zonal action and the endomorphism basis.
  • domain assumption Chapuy-Dołęga Jack-function definition of b-Hurwitz numbers and their cut-and-join recursion (Theorem 6.5 of [18])
    Used in Section 5 as the external benchmark to identify specialized refined Hurwitz numbers with b-Hurwitz numbers.
  • domain assumption Twisted tropical cover correspondence and automorphism factor of Proposition 2.32, following [43,44]
    Basis for the tropical counts and for the piecewise polynomiality proof in Sections 5 and 6.
  • standard math Jack functions: orthogonality, b-content, and specializations to Schur and zonal functions
    Defines b-Hurwitz numbers in Section 2.5 and underlies the conjectural specialization in Remark 4.15.
invented entities (1)
  • CJT-refined action and refined Jucys-Murphy elements with C,J,T weights independent evidence
    purpose: Interpolate between Schur and zonal actions and conjecturally realize the Jack action and b-Hurwitz theory
    The action specializes to independently known Schur and zonal structure coefficients (Theorem 4.12) and matches known recursions for b-Hurwitz numbers in the treated cases; the full Jack spectrum remains unproved.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A refined twist on Hurwitz numbers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YYNDPZOX

@misc{pith2026250806188,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A refined twist on Hurwitz numbers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YYNDPZOX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.06188}
}
abstract

We introduce a two-parameter refinement of the Jucys-Murphy theory, that we call the CJT-refinement, unifying Schur, zonal, and, conjecturally, Jack actions of the ring of symmetric functions on the Fock space. Applications of this formalism include a partial resolution of a recent conjecture of Coulter-Do, as well as cut-and-join recursion for $b$-Hurwitz numbers. The cut-and-join equations enable the derivation of the tropicalization of $b$--Hurwitz numbers. We also provide a first application of this tropical interpretation by answering an open problem of Chapuy-Do{\l}\k{e}ga on the polynomial structure of $b$-Hurwitz numbers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.06188 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A Young diagram and contents of its boxes. As it was mentioned in Subsection 2.1, the algebra of conjugacy classes can be used for counting the complex covers of C𝑃 1 with a prescribed ramification data. Generalizing Definition 2.1, by a ramified cover of C𝑃 1 by a Riemann surface Σ we mean a holomor￾phic map 𝑓 : Σ → C𝑃 1 . Given such a map of degree 𝑛, every critical value 𝑎 ∈ C𝑃 1 of 𝑓 gets endowed with the corres… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The perfect matchings corresponding to 𝜏 (in blue), and 𝜌 = (3 5¯) (5 7) (3 7 ¯ ) (1 4 ¯ ) (1 4¯) (2 2¯) (6 6¯) (in red) in 𝜌 ∪ 𝜏. The picture indicates that the type of 𝜌 is (3 1 2 1 1 2 ). Proof. For any fixed points free involution 𝜌, the product 𝜌𝜏 is an element of 𝑆2𝑛 of cycle type corresponding to a union 𝜆 ∪ 𝜆 of a partition 𝜆 ⊢ 𝑛 with itself. The “if” part of the Proposition is obvious. The “only if” part ca… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The transposition (𝑖 𝑗) makes a cut of one of the cycles. Here, 𝐴 and 𝐵 denote sequences of elements separated by elements 𝑖 and 𝑗, that are shared on the pictures on the right and on the left. Arrows show the orders in which the sequences 𝐴 and 𝐵 should be read. The same picture read right to left represents a join of two cycles performed by the transposition (𝑖 𝑗). where the sum goes over all twisted tropical cove… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The transposition (𝑖 𝑗) makes a twist of one of the cycles. Here, 𝐴 and 𝐵 denote sequences of elements separated by elements 𝑖 and 𝑗, that are shared on the pictures on the right and on the left. Arrows show the orders in which the sequences 𝐴 and 𝐵 should be read. inv…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A fixed point-free involution 𝜌 = (1 2 ¯ ) (2 3 ¯ ) (3 4¯) (1 4) such that [š(1 3 ¯ ),š(2 4)].𝜌 = (𝑇 2 − 𝐶 𝐽) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The perfect matchings corresponding to 𝜏 (in blue), and the preferred representative 𝜌n for n = (1, 1, 2, 3) (in red). two compositions of 𝑛. The symbol 𝑁 𝑎 𝑔  𝑛1,...,𝑛𝑝 𝑚1,𝑚2,...,𝑚𝑞 |𝑟  for 𝑟 ∈ {1, . . . , 𝑞}, 𝑎 ∈ {1, . . . , 𝑛𝑝 } stands for 1 𝐶𝑞 𝐽 𝑝 Î(2𝑗) 𝑛𝑗 multip…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The tropical count of the 𝑏 double Hurwitz number ℎ trop 2  (𝑚1 ) (𝑚1 )  . The top row shows the twisted covers, the bottom row the quotient covers. The leftmost vertex can be a vertex which joins two edges, such that the cut off graph is still connected. That means …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Two equivalent tropical quotient covers: they differ only by the order of the images of vertices in the two connected components we obtain when we cut all edges between the second and third branch point. Two tropical quotient covers 𝜋 and 𝜋 ′ are equivalent, if they di…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The tropical count of ℎ ≤,trop 1 ( (2);𝑏). of tropical quotient covers, we do not have a binomial factor for the alignment of the vertices in the two parts. □ Example 5.23 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p050_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: A twisted monotone cover of type (1, (2, 2), (4)). The numbers in paren￾theses denote the counters, those without the edge weights. (5) We proceed inductively as in step (4) for 𝜎𝑖+1 (𝜎𝑖 · · · 𝜎1𝜎𝑛𝜏𝜎1 · · · 𝜎𝑖𝜏)𝜎𝑖+1 until 𝑖 = 𝑘. For 𝑖 = 𝑘, we obtain ends that are labe…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [18]

    Tropicalizing the space of admissible covers

    R. Cavalieri, H. Markwig, and D. Ranganathan. “Tropicalizing the space of admissible covers”. In: Mathematische Annalen 364.3 (2016), pp. 1275–1313

    work page 2016

  2. [6]

    b-monotone Hurwitz numbers: Virasoro constraints, BKP hierarchy, and O (N)-BGW integral

    V. Bonzom, G. Chapuy, and M. Doł˛ ega. “b-monotone Hurwitz numbers: Virasoro constraints, BKP hierarchy, and O (N)-BGW integral”. In:International Mathematics Research Notices 2023.14 (2023), pp. 12172–12230

    work page 2023

  3. [21]

    𝑏-Hurwitz numbers from refined topological recursion

    N. K. Chidambaram, M. Doł˛ ega, and K. Osuga. “𝑏-Hurwitz numbers from refined topological recursion”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.17502 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  4. [1]

    Generators of the Hecke algebra of (S2n, Bn)

    K. Aker and M. B. Can. “Generators of the Hecke algebra of (S2n, Bn)”. In: Advances in Mathe- matics 231.5 (2012), pp. 2465–2483

    work page 2012

  5. [2]

    Weighted Hurwitz numbers and topolog- ical recursion: an overview

    A. Alexandrov, G. Chapuy, B. Eynard, and J. Harnad. “Weighted Hurwitz numbers and topolog- ical recursion: an overview”. In: Journal of Mathematical Physics 59.8 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [3]

    Ramifications of Hurwitz theory, KP integrability and quantum curves

    A. Alexandrov, D. Lewanski, and S. Shadrin. “Ramifications of Hurwitz theory, KP integrability and quantum curves”. In: Journal of High Energy Physics 2016.5 (2016), pp. 1–31

    work page 2016

  7. [4]

    Tropical Open Hurwitz numbers

    B. Bertrand, E. Brugallé, and G. Mikhalkin. “Tropical Open Hurwitz numbers”. In: Rend. Semin. Mat. Univ. Padova 125 (2011), pp. 157–171

    work page 2011

  8. [5]

    Tropical mirror symmetry for elliptic curves

    J. Böhm, K. Bringmann, A. Buchholz, and H. Markwig. “Tropical mirror symmetry for elliptic curves”. In: Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal) 2017.732 (2017), pp. 211–246

    work page 2017

Show all 68 references
  1. [7]

    Double Hurwitz numbers: poly- nomiality, topological recursion and intersection theory

    G. Borot, N. Do, M. Karev, D. Lewański, and E. Moskovsky. “Double Hurwitz numbers: poly- nomiality, topological recursion and intersection theory”. In: Mathematische Annalen 387.1-2 (2023), pp. 179–243

    2023

  2. [8]

    On ELSV-type formulae and relations betweenΩ-integrals via deformations of spectral curves

    G. Borot, M. Karev, and D. Lewański. “On ELSV-type formulae and relations betweenΩ-integrals via deformations of spectral curves”. In: Journal of Geometry and Physics 207 (2025), p. 105343

    2025

  3. [9]

    Topological recursion on transalgebraic spectral curves and Atlantes Hurwitz numbers

    V. Bouchard, R. Kramer, and Q. Weller. “Topological recursion on transalgebraic spectral curves and Atlantes Hurwitz numbers”. In: Journal of Geometry and Physics 206 (2024), p. 105306

    2024

  4. [10]

    Real algebraic curves and twisted Hurwitz numbers

    Y. Burman and R. Fesler. “Real algebraic curves and twisted Hurwitz numbers”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.06171 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Ribbon decomposition and twisted Hurwitz numbers

    Y. Burman and R. Fesler. “Ribbon decomposition and twisted Hurwitz numbers”. English. In: Math. Res. Rep. (Amst.) 5 (2024), pp. 1–19. issn: 2772-9559. doi: 10.5802/mrr.19

    2024 doi

  6. [12]

    Explicit closed algebraic formulas for Orlov–Scherbin𝑛-point functions

    B. Bychkov, P. Dunin-Barkowski, M. Kazarian, and S. Shadrin. “Explicit closed algebraic formulas for Orlov–Scherbin𝑛-point functions”. In: Journal de l’École polytechnique—Mathématiques 9 (2022), pp. 1121–1158

    2022

  7. [13]

    Topological recursion for Kadomtsev–Petviashvili tau functions of hypergeometric type

    B. Bychkov, P. Dunin-Barkowski, M. Kazarian, and S. Shadrin. “Topological recursion for Kadomtsev–Petviashvili tau functions of hypergeometric type”. In: Journal of the London Mathematical Society 109.6 (2024), e12946

    2024

  8. [14]

    Tropical Hurwitz numbers

    R. Cavalieri, P. Johnson, and H. Markwig. “Tropical Hurwitz numbers”. In: J. Algebraic Combin. 32.2 (2010), pp. 241–265. issn: 0925-9899,1572-9192. doi: 10.1007/s10801-009-0213-

    2010 doi

  9. [15]

    url: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10801-009-0213-0

    doi

  10. [16]

    Wall Crossings for Double Hurwitz numbers

    R. Cavalieri, P. Johnson, and H. Markwig. “Wall Crossings for Double Hurwitz numbers”. In: Adv. Math. 228.4 (2011). arXiv:1003.1805, pp. 1894–1937. REFERENCES 57

    2011 arXiv

  11. [17]

    A graphical interface for the Gromov-Witten theory of curves

    R. Cavalieri, P. Johnson, H. Markwig, and D. Ranganathan. “A graphical interface for the Gromov-Witten theory of curves”. In:Algebraic Geometry Salt Lake City 2015 . Vol. 97. American Mathematical Society. 2018, pp. 139–168

    2015

  12. [19]

    Non-orientable branched coverings, b-Hurwitz numbers, and posi- tivity for multiparametric Jack expansions

    G. Chapuy and M. Doł ˛ ega. “Non-orientable branched coverings, b-Hurwitz numbers, and posi- tivity for multiparametric Jack expansions”. In: Advances in Mathematics 409 (2022), p. 108645

    2022

  13. [20]

    𝑏-Hurwitz numbers from Whittaker vectors for W-algebras

    N. K. Chidambaram, M. Doł˛ ega, and K. Osuga. “𝑏-Hurwitz numbers from Whittaker vectors for W-algebras”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.12814 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    From Weingarten calculus for real Grassmannians to deformations of monotone Hurwitz numbers and Jucys-Murphy elements

    X. Coulter and N. Do. “From Weingarten calculus for real Grassmannians to deformations of monotone Hurwitz numbers and Jucys-Murphy elements”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.04002 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Mirror symmetry and elliptic curves

    R. Dijkgraaf. “Mirror symmetry and elliptic curves”. In: The moduli space of curves . Springer, 1995, pp. 149–163

    1995

  16. [24]

    Towards the topological recursion for double hurwitz numbers

    N. Do and M. Karev. “Towards the topological recursion for double hurwitz numbers”. In: Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics . 2018, pp. 151–178

    2018

  17. [25]

    Topological recursion and a quantum curve for monotone Hurwitz numbers

    N. Do, A. Dyer, and D. V. Mathews. “Topological recursion and a quantum curve for monotone Hurwitz numbers”. In: Journal of Geometry and Physics 120 (2017), pp. 19–36

    2017

  18. [26]

    Monotone orbifold Hurwitz numbers

    N. Do and M. Karev. “Monotone orbifold Hurwitz numbers”. In:Journal of Mathematical Sciences 226.5 (2017), pp. 568–587

    2017

  19. [27]

    Pruned Hurwitz numbers

    N. Do and P. Norbury. “Pruned Hurwitz numbers”. In:Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 370.5 (2018), pp. 3053–3084

    2018

  20. [28]

    On Hurwitz numbers and Hodge integrals

    T. Ekedahl, S. Lando, M. Shapiro, and A. Vainshtein. “On Hurwitz numbers and Hodge integrals”. In: Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences-Series I-Mathematics 328.12 (1999), pp. 1175–1180

    1999

  21. [29]

    Hurwitz numbers and intersections on moduli spaces of curves

    T. Ekedahl, S. Lando, M. Shapiro, and A. Vainshtein. “Hurwitz numbers and intersections on moduli spaces of curves.” English. In: Invent. Math. 146.2 (2001), pp. 297–327. issn: 0020-9910. doi: 10.1007/s002220100164

    2001 doi

  22. [30]

    Combinatorics of pruned Hurwitz numbers

    S. G. Fitzgerald, M. A. Hahn, and S. Kelly. “Combinatorics of pruned Hurwitz numbers”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.05225 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Counting Feynman-like graphs: quasimodularity and Siegel–Veech weight

    E. Goujard and M. Möller. “Counting Feynman-like graphs: quasimodularity and Siegel–Veech weight”. In: Journal of the European Mathematical Society 22.2 (2019), pp. 365–412

    2019

  24. [32]

    Connection coefficients, matchings, maps and combinatorial con- jectures for Jack symmetric functions

    I. Goulden and D. Jackson. “Connection coefficients, matchings, maps and combinatorial con- jectures for Jack symmetric functions”. In: Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 348.3 (1996), pp. 873–892

    1996

  25. [33]

    Monotone Hurwitz numbers and the HCIZ integral

    I. P. Goulden, M. Guay-Paquet, and J. Novak. “Monotone Hurwitz numbers and the HCIZ integral”. In: Annales mathématiques Blaise Pascal. Vol. 21. 1. 2014, pp. 71–89

    2014

  26. [34]

    Toda equations and piecewise polynomiality for mixed double Hurwitz numbers

    I. P. Goulden, M. Guay-Paquet, J. Novak, et al. “Toda equations and piecewise polynomiality for mixed double Hurwitz numbers”. In: SIGMA. Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications 12 (2016), p. 040

    2016

  27. [35]

    The KP hierarchy, branched covers, and triangulations

    I. P. Goulden and D. M. Jackson. “The KP hierarchy, branched covers, and triangulations”. In: Advances in Mathematics 219.3 (2008), pp. 932–951

    2008

  28. [36]

    Towards the geometry of double Hurwitz numbers

    I. P. Goulden, D. M. Jackson, and R. Vakil. “Towards the geometry of double Hurwitz numbers”. In: Advances in Mathematics 198.1 (2005), pp. 43–92

    2005

  29. [37]

    Generating functions for weighted Hurwitz numbers

    M. Guay-Paquet and J. Harnad. “Generating functions for weighted Hurwitz numbers”. In: Journal of Mathematical Physics 58.8 (2017). 58 REFERENCES

    2017

  30. [38]

    The combinatorics of real double Hurwitz numbers with real positive branch points

    M. Guay-Paquet, H. Markwig, and J. Rau. “The combinatorics of real double Hurwitz numbers with real positive branch points”. In: International Mathematics Research Notices 2016.1 (2016), pp. 258–293

    2016

  31. [39]

    Wall-crossing and recursion formulae for tropical Jucys covers

    M. Hahn and D. Lewański. “Wall-crossing and recursion formulae for tropical Jucys covers”. In: Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 373.7 (2020), pp. 4685–4711

    2020

  32. [40]

    Pruned double Hurwitz numbers

    M. A. Hahn. “Pruned double Hurwitz numbers”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.01598 (2015)

    2015 arXiv

  33. [41]

    A monodromy graph approach to the piecewise polynomiality of simple, monotone and Grothendieck dessins d’enfants double Hurwitz numbers

    M. A. Hahn. “A monodromy graph approach to the piecewise polynomiality of simple, monotone and Grothendieck dessins d’enfants double Hurwitz numbers”. In: Graphs and Combinatorics 35.3 (2019), pp. 729–766

    2019

  34. [42]

    Triply mixed coverings of arbitrary base curves: quasimodularity, quantum curves and a mysterious topological recursion

    M. A. Hahn, J.-W. van Ittersum, and F. Leid. “Triply mixed coverings of arbitrary base curves: quasimodularity, quantum curves and a mysterious topological recursion”. In: Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré D 9.2 (2022), pp. 239–296

    2022

  35. [43]

    Tropical Jucys covers

    M. A. Hahn and D. Lewanski. “Tropical Jucys covers”. In:Mathematische Zeitschrift 301.2 (2022), pp. 1719–1738

    2022

  36. [44]

    Tropical twisted Hurwitz numbers for elliptic curves

    M. A. Hahn and H. Markwig. “Tropical twisted Hurwitz numbers for elliptic curves”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.00333 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Twisted Hurwitz numbers: tropical and polynomial structures

    M. A. Hahn and H. Markwig. “Twisted Hurwitz numbers: tropical and polynomial structures”. In: Algebr. Comb. 7.4 (2024), pp. 1075–1101. issn: 2589-5486

    2024

  38. [46]

    Tropicalising hypergeometric𝜏-functions

    M. A. Hahn, B. O’Callaghan, and J. Wahl. “Tropicalising hypergeometric𝜏-functions”. In: to appear (2025)

    2025

  39. [47]

    Some combinatorial aspects of the spectra of normally distributed random matrices

    P. J. Hanlon, R. P. Stanley, and J. R. Stembridge. “Some combinatorial aspects of the spectra of normally distributed random matrices”. In: Contemporary Mathematics 138 (1992), pp. 151–174

    1992

  40. [48]

    Über Riemann’sche Flächen mit gegebenen Verzweigungspunkten

    A. Hurwitz. “Über Riemann’sche Flächen mit gegebenen Verzweigungspunkten”. In: Mathema- tische Annalen 39 (1891), pp. 1–60

  41. [49]

    Hurwitz numbers for real polynomials

    I. Itenberg and D. Zvonkine. “Hurwitz numbers for real polynomials”. In: Commentarii Mathe- matici Helvetici 93.3 (2018), pp. 441–474

    2018

  42. [50]

    Symmetric polynomials and the center of the symmetric group ring

    A.-A. Jucys. “Symmetric polynomials and the center of the symmetric group ring”. In: Reports on Mathematical Physics 5.1 (1974), pp. 107–112

    1974

  43. [51]

    Covers counting via Feynman calculus

    M. Karev. “Covers counting via Feynman calculus”. In: Journal of Mathematical Sciences 190.3 (2013), pp. 438–450

    2013

  44. [52]

    Virasoro constraints and topological recursion for Grothendieck’s dessin counting

    M. Kazarian and P. Zograf. “Virasoro constraints and topological recursion for Grothendieck’s dessin counting”. In: Letters in Mathematical Physics 105.8 (2015), pp. 1057–1084

    2015

  45. [53]

    Quantum curves from refined topological recursion: the genus 0 case

    O. Kidwai and K. Osuga. “Quantum curves from refined topological recursion: the genus 0 case”. In: Advances in Mathematics 432 (2023), p. 109253

    2023

  46. [54]

    Hurwitz numbers: on the edge between combinatorics and geometry

    S. K. Lando. “Hurwitz numbers: on the edge between combinatorics and geometry”. In:Proceed- ings of the International Congress of Mathematicians 2010 (ICM 2010) (In 4 Volumes) Vol. I: Plenary Lectures and Ceremonies Vols. II–IV: Invited Lectures . World Scientific. 2010, pp. 2444–2470

    2010

  47. [55]

    S. K. Lando and A. K. Zvonkin. Graphs on surfaces and their applications . Vol. 141. Springer Science & Business Media, 2003

    2003

  48. [56]

    Real Hurwitz numbers

    M. Lozhkin. “Real Hurwitz numbers”. MA thesis. Saint-Petersburg State University, 2022

    2022

  49. [57]

    I. G. Macdonald. Symmetric functions and Hall polynomials . Oxford university press, 1998

    1998

  50. [58]

    Jucys–Murphy elements, orthogonal matrix integrals, and Jack measures

    S. Matsumoto. “Jucys–Murphy elements, orthogonal matrix integrals, and Jack measures”. In: The Ramanujan Journal 26.1 (2011), pp. 69–107

    2011

  51. [59]

    Polynomial recursion formula for linear Hodge integrals

    M. Mulase and N. Zhang. “Polynomial recursion formula for linear Hodge integrals”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:0908.2267 (2009)

    2009 arXiv

  52. [60]

    A new construction of Young’s seminormal representation of the symmetric groups

    G. E. Murphy. “A new construction of Young’s seminormal representation of the symmetric groups”. In: Journal of Algebra 69.2 (1981), pp. 287–297. REFERENCES 59

    1981

  53. [61]

    BKP and projective Hurwitz numbers

    S. M. Natanzon and A. Y. Orlov. “BKP and projective Hurwitz numbers”. In: Letters in Mathe- matical Physics 107.6 (2017), pp. 1065–1109

    2017

  54. [62]

    Toda equations for Hurwitz numbers

    A. Okounkov. “Toda equations for Hurwitz numbers”. English. In: Math. Res. Lett. 7.4 (2000), pp. 447–453. issn: 1073-2780. doi: 10.4310/MRL.2000.v7.n4.a10

    2000 doi

  55. [63]

    Gromov-Witten theory, Hurwitz theory, and completed cycles

    A. Okounkov and R. Pandharipande. “Gromov-Witten theory, Hurwitz theory, and completed cycles”. In: Annals of mathematics (2006), pp. 517–560

    2006

  56. [64]

    Hypergeometric solutions of soliton equations

    A. Y. Orlov and D. Scherbin. “Hypergeometric solutions of soliton equations”. In: Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 128.1 (2001), pp. 906–926

    2001

  57. [65]

    Refined Topological Recursion Revisited: Properties and Conjectures

    K. Osuga. “Refined Topological Recursion Revisited: Properties and Conjectures”. In: Commu- nications in Mathematical Physics 405.12 (2024), p. 296

    2024

  58. [66]

    A new approach to the representation theory of the symmetric groups. II

    A. M. Vershik and A. Y. Okounkov. “A new approach to the representation theory of the symmetric groups. II”. In: Journal of Mathematical Sciences 131.2 (2005), pp. 5471–5494

    2005

  59. [67]

    On the recursion formula for double Hurwitz numbers

    S. Zhu. “On the recursion formula for double Hurwitz numbers”. In:Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 140.11 (2012), pp. 3749–3760

    2012

  60. [68]

    Jucys-Murphy elements and Weingarten matrices

    P. Zinn-Justin. “Jucys-Murphy elements and Weingarten matrices”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:0907.2719 (2009). 60 REFERENCES Appendix A. Elementary symmetric functions in preliminary refined Jucys-Murphy elements applied to the type indicators The table below contains the results ...

    2009 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.