Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 116 references

Use Cases for Voice Anonymization

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that voice anonymization requirements are use-case-specific and proposes the first taxonomy of use cases, with derived requirements and design criteria for developing and evaluating anonymization systems.

desk verdict A plausible taxonomy for voice anonymization use cases, but the user study evidence is unverifiable from the abstract and the full text is corrupted. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.06356 v1 pith:CRWZTXF6 submitted 2025-08-08 eess.AS

Sarina Meyer , Ngoc Thang Vu This is my paper
classification eess.AS
keywords voiceanonymizationspeakerprivacyusecasetaxonomyprivacy-utilitytrade-offuserstudydesigncriteriaspeechdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that voice anonymization is currently judged by a one-size-fits-all trade-off between hiding the speaker's identity and preserving data utility, but the right balance depends heavily on the context. To fix this, it proposes the first taxonomy of use cases for voice anonymization, built from an extensive literature analysis and a user study of public expectations. From the taxonomy, the authors derive concrete requirements and design criteria that method developers and evaluators should follow. If the claim holds, the field should shift from generic privacy-versus-utility benchmarks toward use-case-specific designs and evaluations.

What carries the argument

The central object is the taxonomy of use cases: a classification scheme that groups voice anonymization contexts by situational factors such as who is being protected, what kind of speech is involved, and what the anonymized data will be used for. The taxonomy is built from a literature analysis plus a user study, and it acts as the bridge that turns contextual expectations into concrete requirements and design criteria for method development and evaluation.

What would settle it

Run the user study again with a large, demographically representative sample and check whether the resulting use cases and expectations fit the proposed taxonomy. If substantial groups name use cases the taxonomy does not cover, or express expectations that conflict with its design criteria, the central claim of generality fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that there is no single correct voice anonymization setting; the acceptable trade-off between speaker anonymity and downstream utility varies by use case. The paper establishes this by collecting possible use cases from the literature and from a user study, then organizing them into what it calls the first taxonomy of use cases for voice anonymization. Each branch of the taxonomy carries requirements that determine which aspects of the speech signal must be preserved and which must be removed. The authors then derive design criteria for methods and evaluation, and recommend that future research be organized around these use cases rather than around a single abstract priv

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the user study participants represent the general public; the abstract gives no sample size, recruitment method, geography, or demographic spread, so if the sample is small or narrow, the derived use cases and requirements may not generalize.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Evaluation of voice anonymization should be benchmarked per use case rather than reported as a single privacy-versus-utility curve.
  • Method development should target requirements that differ by context, such as preserving emotional content, regional accent, or naturalness versus maximizing speaker indistinguishability.
  • Public expectations should play a role in setting requirements for privacy-protecting speech tools, not just expert-defined metrics.
  • Existing anonymization systems can be positioned within the taxonomy, revealing use cases for which no current method is designed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same use-case-dependent reasoning likely applies to neighboring domains such as face anonymization or text anonymization, where a single global privacy-utility measure may also hide context-specific requirements.
  • If public expectations vary across demographics or cultures, the taxonomy may need regional or population-specific branches rather than one universal list of use cases.
  • A practical next step would be to turn the derived design criteria into a concrete evaluation benchmark with separate leaderboards per use case; the paper itself does not build that benchmark.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper argues that voice anonymization is typically evaluated through a single privacy-versus-utility trade-off, but that actual requirements depend on the use case. Based on an 'extensive literature analysis' and a user study of general-public expectations, the authors propose what they call the first taxonomy of use cases for voice anonymization and derive requirements and design criteria for method development and evaluation. They recommend a shift toward use-case-oriented research and benchmarks.

Significance. If the claims hold, the contribution could be a useful conceptual reorientation for the voice-anonymization community, moving evaluation practice from one-size-fits-all metrics toward use-case-specific benchmarks. The paper's value would rest on the credibility of the literature analysis and user study as the empirical basis for the taxonomy. However, the supplied full text is severely corrupted and unreadable, and the abstract provides no methodological detail. I cannot therefore verify the empirical grounding, the completeness of the literature analysis, or the derivation of the requirements. These are fixable in principle, so the potential significance is real but currently unassessable.

major comments (4)
  1. [Full text (passim)] The supplied full text is corrupted mojibake and contains interloping text from arXiv:2508.06355 (a quant-ph paper). The actual methods, figures, tables, and discussion are unreadable. Because the central claim is that the taxonomy and requirements are 'based on these studies', the evidence needed to evaluate that claim is entirely unavailable. This is a load-bearing issue, not a presentation nit: the manuscript must be re-supplied in readable form before any assessment of its technical content is possible.
  2. [Abstract / User study] The abstract states that a user study was conducted to 'understand the expectations of the general public towards such tools' and that the taxonomy is 'based on these studies'. No sample size, recruitment channel, geography, demographic breakdown, questionnaire design, or analysis method is reported anywhere in the readable portions. If the sample is small, self-selected, or culturally narrow, the derived use cases and requirements will not support the stated generalization to the general public. This is a load-bearing methodological detail that must be supplied.
  3. [Abstract / Literature analysis] The paper claims an 'extensive literature analysis' and that the proposed taxonomy is the 'first' of its kind. No search protocol, inclusion/exclusion criteria, number of papers, or synthesis method is described in the readable text. Without this, the completeness claim behind 'first taxonomy' is unverifiable. The authors should either document the search and coding protocol or soften the claim to a systematic review of the covered corpora.
  4. [Taxonomy derivation] The abstract suggests that the taxonomy is derived from literature and user expectations and then also used as the scheme for evaluating design criteria. To avoid circularity, the paper must specify how use-case categories were coded, how they were validated, and how the requirements were derived independently of the taxonomy categories. The readable text does not show this; if it is in the corrupted portion, it must be clarified.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'the first taxonomy' should include a qualifier such as 'to our knowledge' and should be supported by a systematic comparison with existing conceptual frameworks in the full text.
  2. [Title] The title 'Use Cases for Voice Anonymization' is broad; a subtitle such as 'A Taxonomy and Derived Design Requirements' would better reflect the claimed contribution.
  3. [User study ethics] If a user study was conducted, the paper must state whether it received ethical approval or explain why this was not required. This is standard for human-subjects research and is missing from the abstract.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's taxonomy and requirements are conceptual outputs of a literature analysis and user study, not fitted predictions or self-citational forced results.

full rationale

The abstract reports a qualitative research process: an extensive literature analysis and a user study are used to collect use cases and understand public expectations, and 'based on these studies' the authors propose a taxonomy and derive requirements/design criteria. This is a conceptual classification and requirements-engineering contribution, not a quantitative derivation. There is no equation, fitted parameter, or predictive quantity that is being renamed as a result, so none of the circularity patterns (self-definitional definitions, fitted-input-called-prediction, self-citation load-bearing, imported uniqueness, ansatz via citation, renaming a known result) can be exhibited from the available text. The concern that the user study sample may not represent the general public is a validity and generalizability limitation, not a circularity: the taxonomy is not defined in terms of the study outcome in a way that makes its evaluation equivalent to its inputs. The supplied full text is heavily corrupted and even includes passages from an unrelated quant-ph paper, so no load-bearing self-citation chain can be identified or quoted. Under the rule that circularity must be demonstrated by quoting the paper and exhibiting a specific reduction, the honest finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numerical free parameters appear in this qualitative work; the hand-chosen elements are the taxonomy categories and the requirement sets, which are conceptual classifications rather than fitted values. No new physical or formal entities (particles, forces, dimensions, conserved quantities) are introduced. The taxonomy is a conceptual artifact, not an entity with an independent falsifiable handle.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The relevant requirements for a voice anonymization system depend on the use case, and these use cases are rarely specified in current research papers.
    This is the motivating premise of the paper (abstract, first sentences). The literature analysis is supposed to support it, but it also functions as an input framing that justifies why a taxonomy is needed at all.
  • domain assumption Public expectations, as captured by the user study, are valid evidence for defining design criteria for anonymization tools.
    Load-bearing: the abstract states the taxonomy and requirements are proposed 'based on these studies.' If public expectations are not the right normative source for requirements, the derived design criteria do not follow.
  • domain assumption The user study sample represents the general public and its concerns about voice anonymization.
    The abstract claims the study reveals 'the expectations of the general public,' but no sample details are visible. The external validity of the taxonomy and requirements depends on this representativeness claim.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Use Cases for Voice Anonymization." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CRWZTXF6

@misc{pith2026250806356,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Use Cases for Voice Anonymization},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CRWZTXF6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.06356}
}
read the original abstract

The performance of a voice anonymization system is typically measured according to its ability to hide the speaker's identity and keep the data's utility for downstream tasks. This means that the requirements the anonymization should fulfill depend on the context in which it is used and may differ greatly between use cases. However, these use cases are rarely specified in research papers. In this paper, we study the implications of use case-specific requirements on the design of voice anonymization methods. We perform an extensive literature analysis and user study to collect possible use cases and to understand the expectations of the general public towards such tools. Based on these studies, we propose the first taxonomy of use cases for voice anonymization, and derive a set of requirements and design criteria for method development and evaluation. Using this scheme, we propose to focus more on use case-oriented research and development of voice anonymization systems.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

116 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Champion, D

    P. Champion, D. Jouvet, and A. Larcher, `` A Study of F0 Modification for X-Vector Based Speech Pseudo-Anonymization Across Gender ,'' in The Second AAAI Workshop on Privacy-Preserving Artificial Intelligence (PPAI). , online, United States, Nov. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02995862

    2020

  2. [2]

    C. O. Mawalim and M. Unoki, ``Improving security in mcadams coefficient-based speaker anonymization by watermarking method,'' in 2021 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC), 2021, pp. 1627--1633

    2021

  3. [3]

    Zhang, Z

    S. Zhang, Z. Li, and A. Das, ``Privacy measurement of physical attributes on voice anonymity,'' in Proceedings of the 30th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, ser. ACM MobiCom '24. 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4em New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2024, p. 1650–1652. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1...

    work page arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Franzreb, A

    C. Franzreb, A. Das, H. Gieseler, E. C. Jahn, T. Polzehl, and S. Möller, ``Towards audiovisual anonymization for remote psychotherapy: a subjective evaluation,'' in 4th Symposium on Security and Privacy in Speech Communication, 2024, pp. 102--110

    2024

  5. [5]

    Huang, Y.-C

    W.-C. Huang, Y.-C. Wu, and T. Toda, ``Multi-speaker text-to-speech training with speaker anonymized data,'' IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 31, pp. 2995--2999, 2024

    2024

  6. [6]

    The VoicePrivacy 2020 Challenge Evaluation Plan

    N. Tomashenko, B. M. L. Srivastava, X. Wang, E. Vincent, A. Nautsch, J. Yamagishi, N. Evans, J. Patino, J.-F. Bonastre, P.-G. Noé, and M. Todisco, ``The voiceprivacy 2020 challenge evaluation plan,'' 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.07123

    work page Pith review arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Tomashenko, X

    N. Tomashenko, X. Miao, P. Champion, S. Meyer, X. Wang, E. Vincent, M. Panariello, N. Evans, J. Yamagishi, and M. Todisco, ``The voiceprivacy 2024 challenge evaluation plan,'' 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.02677

    arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Tomashenko, X

    N. Tomashenko, X. Wang, X. Miao, H. Nourtel, P. Champion, M. Todisco, E. Vincent, N. Evans, J. Yamagishi, and J.-F. Bonastre, ``The voiceprivacy 2022 challenge evaluation plan,'' 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.12468

    arXiv 2022

Show all 116 references
  1. [9]

    Nourtel, P

    H. Nourtel, P. Champion, D. Jouvet, A. Larcher, and M. Tahon, ``Evaluation of speaker anonymization on emotional speech,'' in 2021 ISCA Symposium on Security and Privacy in Speech Communication, 2021, pp. 62--66

    2021

  2. [10]

    Zhang, Z

    S. Zhang, Z. Li, and A. Das, ``Voicepm: A robust privacy measurement on voice anonymity,'' in Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Security and Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks, ser. WiSec '23. 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4em New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing...

    2023

  3. [11]

    Ghosh, M

    S. Ghosh, M. Jouaiti, A. Das, Y. Sinha, T. Polzehl, I. Siegert, and S. Stober, ``Anonymising elderly and pathological speech: Voice conversion using ddsp and query-by-example,'' in Interspeech 2024, 2024, pp. 4438--4442

    2024

  4. [12]

    Ravuri, R

    V. Ravuri, R. Gutierrez-Osuna, and T. Chaspari, ``Preserving mental health information in speech anonymization,'' in 2022 10th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction Workshops and Demos (ACIIW), 2022, pp. 1--8

    2022

  5. [13]

    Tayebi Arasteh, T

    S. Tayebi Arasteh, T. Arias-Vergara, P. A. Perez Toro, T. Weise, K. Packhäuser, M. Schuster, E. Nöth, A. Maier, and S. H. Yang, `` Addressing challenges in speaker anonymization to maintain utility while ensuring privacy of pathological speech,'' Communications Medicine, vol. ...

    2024

  6. [14]

    Y. Zhu, M. Imoussaïne-Aïkous, C. Côté-Lussier, and T. H. Falk, ``On the impact of voice anonymization on speech diagnostic applications: A case study on covid-19 detection,'' IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 19, pp. 5151--5165, 2024

    2024

  7. [15]

    Nautsch, C

    A. Nautsch, C. Jasserand, E. Kindt, M. Todisco, I. Trancoso, and N. Evans, ``The gdpr & speech data: Reflections of legal and technology communities, first steps towards a common understanding,'' in Interspeech 2019, 2019, pp. 3695--3699

    2019

  8. [16]

    Q. Jin, A. R. Toth, T. Schultz, and A. W. Black, ``Speaker de-identification via voice transformation,'' in 2009 IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition & Understanding, 2009, pp. 529--533

    2009

  9. [17]

    ICASSP '09

    ------, ``Voice convergin: Speaker de-identification by voice transformation,'' in Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ser. ICASSP '09. 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4em USA: IEEE Computer Society, 2009, p. 3909–3912. [Onl...

    2009

  10. [18]

    Pobar and I

    M. Pobar and I. Ipšić, ``Online speaker de-identification using voice transformation,'' in 2014 37th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), 2014, pp. 1264--1267

    2014

  11. [19]

    Abou-Zleikha, Z.-H

    M. Abou-Zleikha, Z.-H. Tan, M. G. Christensen, and S. H. Jensen, ``A discriminative approach for speaker selection in speaker de-identification systems,'' in 2015 23rd European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), 2015, pp. 2102--2106

    2015

  12. [20]

    Justin, V

    T. Justin, V. Štruc, S. Dobrišek, B. Vesnicer, I. Ipšić, and F. Mihelič, ``Speaker de-identification using diphone recognition and speech synthesis,'' in 2015 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG), vol. 04, 2015, pp. 1--7

    2015

  13. [21]

    Magariños, P

    C. Magariños, P. Lopez-Otero, L. Docio-Fernandez, E. Rodriguez-Banga, D. Erro, and C. Garcia-Mateo, ``Reversible speaker de-identification using pre-trained transformation functions,'' Computer Speech & Language, vol. 46, pp. 36--52, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.scie...

    2017

  14. [22]

    J. Qian, H. Du, J. Hou, L. Chen, T. Jung, X. Li, Y. Wang, and Y. Deng, ``Voicemask: Anonymize and sanitize voice input on mobile devices,'' ArXiv, vol. abs/1711.11460, 2017

    2017 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Bahmaninezhad, C

    F. Bahmaninezhad, C. Zhang, and J. Hansen, ``Convolutional neural network based speaker de-identification,'' in The Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop (Odyssey 2018), 2018, pp. 255--260

    2018

  16. [24]

    J. Qian, F. Han, J. Hou, C. Zhang, Y. Wang, and X.-Y. Li, ``Towards privacy-preserving speech data publishing,'' in IEEE INFOCOM 2018 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, 2018, pp. 1079--1087

    2018

  17. [25]

    F. Fang, X. Wang, J. Yamagishi, I. Echizen, M. Todisco, N. Evans, and J.-F. Bonastre, `` Speaker Anonymization Using X-vector and Neural Waveform Models ,'' in Proc. 10th ISCA Workshop on Speech Synthesis (SSW 10), 2019, pp. 155--160

    2019

  18. [26]

    Tomashenko, B

    N. Tomashenko, B. M. L. Srivastava, X. Wang, E. Vincent, A. Nautsch, J. Yamagishi, N. Evans, J. Patino, J.-F. Bonastre, P.-G. Noé, and M. Todisco, ``Introducing the voiceprivacy initiative,'' in Interspeech 2020, 2020, pp. 1693--1697

    2020

  19. [27]

    A. S. Shamsabadi, B. M. L. Srivastava, A. Bellet, N. Vauquier, E. Vincent, M. Maouche, M. Tommasi, and N. Papernot, ``Differentially private speaker anonymization,'' Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol., vol. 2023, no. 1, pp. 98--114, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.56...

    2023 doi

  20. [28]

    Panariello, N

    M. Panariello, N. Tomashenko, X. Wang, X. Miao, P. Champion, H. Nourtel, M. Todisco, N. Evans, E. Vincent, and J. Yamagishi, ``The voiceprivacy 2022 challenge: Progress and perspectives in voice anonymisation,'' IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio, Speech and Lang. Proc., vol. 32, p. 3477–3...

    2022

  21. [29]

    Meyer, P

    S. Meyer, P. Tilli, F. Lux, P. Denisov, J. Koch, and N. T. Vu, ``Cascade of phonetic speech recognition, speaker embeddings gan and multispeaker speech synthesis for the voiceprivacy 2022 challenge,'' in 2nd Symposium on Security and Privacy in Speech Communication, 2022

    2022

  22. [30]

    J. Lee, T. Park, and Y. You, ``Voice anonymization using emotion-enriched feature integration with stt and tts models,'' in 4th Symposium on Security and Privacy in Speech Communication, 2024, pp. 50--54

    2024

  23. [31]

    Bäckström, ``Privacy in speech technology,'' 2024

    T. Bäckström, ``Privacy in speech technology,'' 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.05227

    2024

  24. [32]

    M. U. Rahman, M. Larson, L. ten Bosch, and C. Tejedor-García, ``Scenario of use scheme: Threat modelling for speaker privacy protection in the medical domain,'' in 4th Symposium on Security and Privacy in Speech Communication, 2024, pp. 21--25

    2024

  25. [33]

    Williams, K

    J. Williams, K. Pizzi, S. Das, and P.-G. Noé, ``New challenges for content privacy in speech and audio,'' in 2nd Symposium on Security and Privacy in Speech Communication, 2022, pp. 1--6

    2022

  26. [34]

    W. Kang, M. A. Hughes, and D. Roy, ``Anonymization of voices in spaces for civic dialogue: Measuring impact on empathy, trust, and feeling heard,'' Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., vol. 8, no. CSCW2, Nov. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3687021

    2024 doi

  27. [35]

    X. Miao, X. Wang, E. Cooper, J. Yamagishi, N. Evans, M. Todisco, J.-F. Bonastre, and M. Rouvier, ``Synvox2: Towards a privacy-friendly voxceleb2 dataset,'' in ICASSP 2024 - 2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2024, pp. 11\,42...

    2024

  28. [36]

    Hsieh and S

    H.-F. Hsieh and S. E. Shannon, ``Three approaches to qualitative content analysis,'' Qualitative Health Research, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1277--1288, 2005

    2005

  29. [37]

    Aloufi, H

    R. Aloufi, H. Haddadi, and D. Boyle, ``Privacy-preserving voice analysis via disentangled representations,'' in Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Cloud Computing Security Workshop, ser. CCSW'20. 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4em New York, NY, USA: Association for Compu...

    2020

  30. [38]

    Y. Han, Y. Cao, S. Li, Q. Ma, and M. Yoshikawa, ``Voice-indistinguishability -- protecting voiceprint with differential privacy under an untrusted server,'' in Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, ser. CCS '20. 1em plus 0.5em m...

    2020

  31. [39]

    B. M. L. Srivastava, N. Tomashenko, X. Wang, E. Vincent, J. Yamagishi, M. Maouche, A. Bellet, and M. Tommasi, `` Design Choices for X-Vector Based Speaker Anonymization ,'' in Proc. Interspeech 2020, 2020, pp. 1713--1717

    2020

  32. [40]

    I.-C. Yoo, K. Lee, S. Leem, H. Oh, B. Ko, and D. Yook, ``Speaker anonymization for personal information protection using voice conversion techniques,'' IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 198\,637--198\,645, 2020

    2020

  33. [41]

    H. Kai, S. Takamichi, S. Shiota, and H. Kiya, ``Lightweight voice anonymization based on data-driven optimization of cascaded voice modification modules,'' in 2021 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT), 2021, pp. 560--566

    2021

  34. [42]

    Patino, N

    J. Patino, N. Tomashenko, M. Todisco, A. Nautsch, and N. Evans, ``Speaker anonymisation using the mcadams coefficient,'' in Interspeech 2021, 2021, pp. 1099--1103

    2021

  35. [43]

    G. P. Prajapati, D. K. Singh, P. P. Amin, and H. A. Patil, `` Voice Privacy Through x-Vector and CycleGAN-Based Anonymization ,'' in Proc. Interspeech 2021, 2021, pp. 1684--1688

    2021

  36. [44]

    J. Qian, H. Du, J. Hou, L. Chen, T. Jung, and X.-Y. Li, ``Speech sanitizer: Speech content desensitization and voice anonymization,'' IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 2631--2642, 2021

    2021

  37. [45]

    Stoidis and A

    D. Stoidis and A. Cavallaro, `` Protecting Gender and Identity with Disentangled Speech Representations ,'' in Proc. Interspeech 2021, 2021, pp. 1699--1703

    2021

  38. [46]

    Agarwal, A

    A. Agarwal, A. Swain, and S. R. Mahadeva Prasanna, ``Speaker anonymization for machines using sinusoidal model,'' in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing and Communications (SPCOM), 2022, pp. 1--5

    2022

  39. [47]

    Pierre, A

    C. Pierre, A. Larcher, and D. Jouvet, `` Are disentangled representations all you need to build speaker anonymization systems? '' in Proc. Interspeech 2022, 2022, pp. 2793--2797

    2022

  40. [48]

    Chang, I.-C

    H.-P. Chang, I.-C. Yoo, C. Jeong, and D. Yook, ``Zero-shot unseen speaker anonymization via voice conversion,'' IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 130\,190--130\,199, 2022

    2022

  41. [49]

    M. Chen, L. Lu, J. Yu, Y. Chen, Z. Ba, F. Lin, and K. Ren, ``Privacy-utility balanced voice de-identification using adversarial examples,'' 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.05446

    2022 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Costante, M

    M. Costante, M. Matassoni, and A. Brutti, ``Using seq2seq voice conversion with pre-trained representations for audio anonymization: experimental insights,'' in 2022 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2), 2022, pp. 1--7

    2022

  43. [51]

    S. P. Dubagunta, R. J. van Son , and M. Magimai.-Doss, ``Adjustable deterministic pseudonymization of speech,'' Computer Speech & Language, vol. 72, p. 101284, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885230821000851

    2022

  44. [52]

    Hernandez, P

    A. Hernandez, P. A. Pérez-Toro, J. C. Vásquez-Correa, J. R. Orozco-Arroyave, A. Maier, and S. H. Yang, ``Self-supervised speech representations preserve speech characteristics while anonymizing voices,'' 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.01677

    2022 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Y. Hu, R. Li, S. Wang, F. Tao, and Z. Sun, ``Speechhide: A hybrid privacy-preserving mechanism for speech content and voiceprint in speech data sharing,'' in 2022 7th IEEE International Conference on Data Science in Cyberspace (DSC), 2022, pp. 345--352

    2022

  46. [54]

    Maouche, B

    M. Maouche, B. M. L. Srivastava, N. Vauquier, A. Bellet, M. Tommasi, and E. Vincent, ``Enhancing speech privacy with slicing,'' in Interspeech 2022, 2022, pp. 5025--5029

    2022

  47. [55]

    C. O. Mawalim, K. Galajit, J. Karnjana, S. Kidani, and M. Unoki, ``Speaker anonymization by modifying fundamental frequency and x-vector singular value,'' Computer Speech & Language, vol. 73, p. 101326, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/p...

    2022

  48. [56]

    Meyer, F

    S. Meyer, F. Lux, P. Denisov, J. Koch, P. Tilli, and N. T. Vu, ``Speaker anonymization with phonetic intermediate representations,'' in Interspeech 2022, 2022, pp. 4925--4929

    2022

  49. [57]

    X. Miao, X. Wang, E. Cooper, J. Yamagishi, and N. Tomashenko, `` Analyzing Language-Independent Speaker Anonymization Framework under Unseen Conditions ,'' in Proc. Interspeech 2022, 2022, pp. 4426--4430

    2022

  50. [58]

    The Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop (Odyssey 2022), 2022, pp

    ------, `` Language-Independent Speaker Anonymization Approach Using Self-Supervised Pre-Trained Models ,'' in Proc. The Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop (Odyssey 2022), 2022, pp. 279--286

    2022

  51. [59]

    O Reilly, A

    P. O Reilly, A. Bugler, K. Bhandari, M. Morrison, and B. Pardo, ``Voiceblock: Privacy through real-time adversarial attacks with audio-to-audio models,'' in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, S. Koyejo, S. Mohamed, A. Agarwal, D. Belgrave, K. Cho, and A. Oh, Ed...

    2022

  52. [60]

    J. M. Perero-Codosero, F. M. Espinoza-Cuadros, and L. A. Hernández-Gómez, ``X-vector anonymization using autoencoders and adversarial training for preserving speech privacy,'' Computer Speech & Language, vol. 74, p. 101351, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect....

    2022

  53. [61]

    L. Tavi, T. Kinnunen, and R. González Hautamäki , ``Improving speaker de-identification with functional data analysis of f0 trajectories,'' Speech Communication, vol. 140, pp. 1--10, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167639322000498

    2022

  54. [62]

    Turner, G

    H. Turner, G. Lovisotto, and I. Martinovic, ``Generating identities with mixture models for speaker anonymization,'' Computer Speech & Language, vol. 72, p. 101318, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885230821001133

    2022

  55. [63]

    R. Yuan, Y. Wu, J. Li, and J. Kim, ``Deid-vc: Speaker de-identification via zero-shot pseudo voice conversion,'' in Interspeech 2022, 2022, pp. 2593--2597

    2022

  56. [64]

    M. Chen, L. Lu, J. Wang, J. Yu, Y. Chen, Z. Wang, Z. Ba, F. Lin, and K. Ren, ``Voicecloak: Adversarial example enabled voice de-identification with balanced privacy and utility,'' Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., vol. 7, no. 2, Jun. 2023. [Online]. Availa...

    2023 doi

  57. [65]

    J. Deng, F. Teng, Y. Chen, X. Chen, Z. Wang, and W. Xu, ``V-cloak: intelligibility-, naturalness- & timbre-preserving real-time voice anonymization,'' in Proceedings of the 32nd USENIX Conference on Security Symposium, ser. SEC '23. 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4em USA: USENIX Assoc...

    2023

  58. [66]

    Gupta, S

    P. Gupta, S. Singh, G. P. Prajapati, and H. A. Patil, Voice Privacy in Biometrics. 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4em Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023, pp. 1--29. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15816-2_1

    2023 doi

  59. [67]

    Y. Lv, J. Yao, P. Chen, H. Zhou, H. Lu, and L. Xie, ``Salt: Distinguishable speaker anonymization through latent space transformation,'' in 2023 IEEE Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Workshop (ASRU), 2023, pp. 1--8

    2023

  60. [68]

    Meyer, P

    S. Meyer, P. Tilli, P. Denisov, F. Lux, J. Koch, and N. T. Vu, ``Anonymizing speech with generative adversarial networks to preserve speaker privacy,'' in 2022 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT), 2023, pp. 912--919

    2022

  61. [69]

    Meyer, F

    S. Meyer, F. Lux, J. Koch, P. Denisov, P. Tilli, and N. T. Vu, ``Prosody is not identity: A speaker anonymization approach using prosody cloning,'' in ICASSP 2023 - 2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2023, pp. 1--5

    2023

  62. [70]

    X. Miao, X. Wang, E. Cooper, J. Yamagishi, and N. Tomashenko, ``Speaker anonymization using orthogonal householder neural network,'' IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio, Speech and Lang. Proc., vol. 31, p. 3681–3695, Sep. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TASLP.2023.3313429

    2023

  63. [71]

    Nespoli, D

    F. Nespoli, D. Barreda, J. Bitzer, and P. A. Naylor, ``Two-stage voice anonymization for enhanced privacy,'' in Interspeech 2023, 2023, pp. 3854--3858

    2023

  64. [72]

    Tran and M

    M. Tran and M. Soleymani, ``A speech representation anonymization framework via selective noise perturbation,'' in ICASSP 2023 - 2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2023, pp. 1--5

    2023

  65. [73]

    J. Yao, Q. Wang, Y. Lei, P. Guo, L. Xie, N. Wang, and J. Liu, ``Distinguishable speaker anonymization based on formant and fundamental frequency scaling,'' in ICASSP 2023 - 2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2023, pp. 1--5

    2023

  66. [74]

    S. Akti, T. N. Nguyen, Y. Liu, and A. Waibel, ``Voice privacy - investigating voice conversion architecture with different bottleneck features,'' in 4th Symposium on Security and Privacy in Speech Communication, 2024, pp. 44--49

    2024

  67. [75]

    O. L. Blouch, R. BAKARI, and N. Gengembre, ``Tuning dissc for voice privacy challenge 2024,'' in 4th Symposium on Security and Privacy in Speech Communication, 2024, pp. 111--115

    2024

  68. [76]

    Z. Cai, H. L. Xinyuan, A. Garg, L. P. García-Perera, K. Duh, S. Khudanpur, N. Andrews, and M. Wiesner, ``Privacy versus emotion preservation trade-offs in emotion-preserving speaker anonymization,'' in 2024 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT), 2024, pp. 409--414

    2024

  69. [77]

    W. Chen, W. Tang, Y. Meng, and Y. Zhang, ``An hasm-assisted voice disguise scheme for emotion recognition of iot-enabled voice interface,'' IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 11, no. 22, pp. 36\,397--36\,409, 2024

    2024

  70. [78]

    L. Chen, K. A. Lee, W. Guo, and Z.-H. Ling, ``Modeling pseudo-speaker uncertainty in voice anonymization,'' in ICASSP 2024 - 2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2024, pp. 11\,601--11\,605

    2024

  71. [79]

    X. Chen, S. Li, J. Li, H. Huang, Y. Cao, and L. He, ``Reprogramming self-supervised learning-based speech representations for speaker anonymization,'' in Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Conference on Multimedia in Asia, ser. MMAsia '23. 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4em New ...

    2024

  72. [80]

    Cheng, X

    M. Cheng, X. Diao, S. Cheng, and W. Liu, SAIC: Integration of Speech Anonymization and Identity Classification. 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4em Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024, pp. 295--306. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63592-2_22

    2024 doi

  73. [81]

    A. Das, C. Franzreb, T. Herzig, P. Pirlet, and T. Polzehl, ``Comparing speech anonymization efficacy by voice conversion using knn and disentangled speaker feature representations,'' in 4th Symposium on Security and Privacy in Speech Communication, 2024, pp. 121--126

    2024

  74. [82]

    A. Das, C. Franzreb, S. Ghosh, T. Polzehl, and S. Möller, ``Speecher: Towards privacy ensuring decoder only speech reconstruction through disentanglement for german speech anonymization using any-to-many voice conversion,'' in 4th Symposium on Security and Privacy in Speech Co...

    2024

  75. [83]

    W. Gu, Z. Liu, L. Chen, R. Wang, C. Guo, W. Guo, K. A. Lee, and Z.-H. Ling, ``A voice anonymization method based on content and non-content disentanglement for emotion preservation,'' in 4th Symposium on Security and Privacy in Speech Communication, 2024, pp. 116--120

    2024

  76. [84]

    Huang, K

    F. Huang, K. Zeng, and W. Zhu, ``Diffvc+: Improving diffusion-based voice conversion for speaker anonymization,'' in Interspeech 2024, 2024, pp. 4453--4457

    2024

  77. [85]

    Matassoni, S

    M. Matassoni, S. Fong, and A. Brutti, ``Speaker anonymization: Disentangling speaker features from pre-trained speech embeddings for voice conversion,'' Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 9, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/9/3876

    2024

  78. [86]

    Meyer, F

    S. Meyer, F. Lux, and N. T. Vu, ``Probing the feasibility of multilingual speaker anonymization,'' in Interspeech 2024, 2024, pp. 4448--4452

    2024

  79. [87]

    Panariello, M

    M. Panariello, M. Todisco, and N. Evans, ``Preserving spoken content in voice anonymisation with character-level vocoder conditioning,'' in 4th Symposium on Security and Privacy in Speech Communication, 2024, pp. 12--16

    2024

  80. [88]

    Panariello, F

    M. Panariello, F. Nespoli, M. Todisco, and N. Evans, ``Speaker anonymization using neural audio codec language models,'' in ICASSP 2024 - 2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2024, pp. 4725--4729

    2024

  81. [89]

    Pohlhausen, F

    J. Pohlhausen, F. Nespoli, and J. Bitzer, ``Enhancing speech privacy with lpc modifications,'' in 4th Symposium on Security and Privacy in Speech Communication, 2024, pp. 80--85

    2024

  82. [90]

    Quamer and R

    W. Quamer and R. Gutierrez-Osuna, ``End-to-end streaming model for low-latency speech anonymization,'' in 2024 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT), 2024, pp. 727--734

    2024

  83. [91]

    D. K. Singh, G. P. Prajapati, and H. A. Patil, ``Voice privacy using time-scale and pitch modification,'' SN Comput. Sci., vol. 5, no. 2, Jan. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-023-02549-8

    2024 doi

  84. [92]

    R. Wang, L. Chen, K. A. Lee, and Z.-H. Ling, ``Asynchronous voice anonymization using adversarial perturbation on speaker embedding,'' in Interspeech 2024, 2024, pp. 4443--4447

    2024

  85. [93]

    J. J. Webber, O. Watts, G. E. Henter, J. Williams, and S. King, ``Voice conversion-based privacy through adversarial information hiding,'' in 4th Symposium on Security and Privacy in Speech Communication, 2024, pp. 39--43

    2024

  86. [94]

    J. Yao, Q. Wang, P. Guo, Z. Ning, and L. Xie, ``Distinctive and natural speaker anonymization via singular value transformation-assisted matrix,'' IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio, Speech and Lang. Proc., vol. 32, p. 2944–2956, Jun. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TASL...

    2024

  87. [95]

    L. Chen, W. Gu, K. A. Lee, W. Guo, and Z.-H. Ling, ``Pseudo-speaker distribution learning in voice anonymization,'' IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, vol. 33, pp. 272--285, 2025

    2025

  88. [96]

    X. Miao, R. Tao, C. Zeng, and X. Wang, ``A benchmark for multi-speaker anonymization,'' IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 20, pp. 3819--3833, 2025

    2025

  89. [97]

    J. Yao, Q. Wang, P. Guo, Z. Ning, Y. Yang, Y. Pan, and L. Xie, ``Musa: Multi-lingual speaker anonymization via serial disentanglement,'' IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, vol. 33, pp. 1664--1674, 2025

    2025

  90. [98]

    Maouche, B

    M. Maouche, B. M. L. Srivastava, N. Vauquier, A. Bellet, M. Tommasi, and E. Vincent, `` A Comparative Study of Speech Anonymization Metrics ,'' in Proc. Interspeech 2020, 2020, pp. 1708--1712

    2020

  91. [99]

    Nautsch, J

    A. Nautsch, J. Patino, N. Tomashenko, J. Yamagishi, P.-G. Noé, J.-F. Bonastre, M. Todisco, and N. Evans, `` The Privacy ZEBRA: Zero Evidence Biometric Recognition Assessment ,'' in Proc. Interspeech 2020, 2020, pp. 1698--1702

    2020

  92. [100]

    Noé, J.-F

    P.-G. Noé, J.-F. Bonastre, D. Matrouf, N. Tomashenko, A. Nautsch, and N. Evans, `` Speech Pseudonymisation Assessment Using Voice Similarity Matrices ,'' in Proc. Interspeech 2020, 2020, pp. 1718--1722

    2020

  93. [101]

    B. M. Lal Srivastava, N. Vauquier, M. Sahidullah, A. Bellet, M. Tommasi, and E. Vincent, ``Evaluating voice conversion-based privacy protection against informed attackers,'' in ICASSP 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)...

    2020

  94. [102]

    Tomashenko, X

    N. Tomashenko, X. Wang, E. Vincent, J. Patino, B. M. L. Srivastava, P.-G. No\' e , A. Nautsch, N. Evans, J. Yamagishi, B. O’Brien, A. Chanclu, J.-F. Bonastre, M. Todisco, and M. Maouche, ``The voiceprivacy 2020 challenge: Results and findings,'' Comput. Speech Lang., vol. 74, ...

    2020

  95. [103]

    Champion, D

    P. Champion, D. Jouvet, and A. Larcher, ``Evaluating x-vector-based speaker anonymization under white-box assessment,'' in Speech and Computer, A. Karpov and R. Potapova, Eds. 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4em Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 100--111

    2021

  96. [104]

    Champion, T

    P. Champion, T. Thebaud, G. Le Lan, A. Larcher, and D. Jouvet, ``On the invertibility of a voice privacy system using embedding alignment,'' in 2021 IEEE Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Workshop (ASRU), 2021, pp. 191--197

    2021

  97. [105]

    K. Baeg, Y. Han, and B.-K. Jeon, ``Dnn based speaker meta information estimation using privacy-preserving speech data,'' in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp), 2022, pp. 88--91

    2022

  98. [106]

    W. Liu, J. Li, C. Wei, M. Sun, X. Zhang, and Y. Li, ``A novel method to evaluate the privacy protection in speaker anonymization,'' in Artificial Intelligence and Security, X. Sun, X. Zhang, Z. Xia, and E. Bertino, Eds. 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4em Cham: Springer International P...

    2022

  99. [107]

    Franzreb, T

    C. Franzreb, T. Polzehl, and S. Möller, ``A comprehensive evaluation framework for speaker anonymization systems,'' in 3rd Symposium on Security and Privacy in Speech Communication, 2023, pp. 65--72

    2023

  100. [108]

    Panariello, M

    M. Panariello, M. Todisco, and N. Evans, ``Vocoder drift in x-vector–based speaker anonymization,'' in Interspeech 2023, 2023, pp. 2863--2867

    2023

  101. [109]

    Leschanowsky, \"U

    A. Leschanowsky, \"U . E. Gaznepoglu, and N. Peters, ``Voice anonymization for all-bias evaluation of the voice privacy challenge baseline systems,'' in ICASSP 2024 - 2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2024, pp. 4785--4789

    2024

  102. [110]

    Meyer, X

    S. Meyer, X. Miao, and N. T. Vu, ``Voicepat: An efficient open-source evaluation toolkit for voice privacy research,'' IEEE Open Journal of Signal Processing, vol. 5, pp. 257--265, 2024

    2024

  103. [111]

    Williams, K

    J. Williams, K. Pizzi, N. Tomashenko, and S. Das, ``Anonymizing speaker voices: Easy to imitate, difficult to recognize?'' in ICASSP 2024 - 2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2024, pp. 12\,491--12\,495

    2024

  104. [112]

    Tomashenko, E

    N. Tomashenko, E. Vincent, and M. Tommasi, ``Analysis of speech temporal dynamics in the context of speaker verification and voice anonymization,'' in ICASSP 2025 - 2025 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2025, pp. 1--5

    2025

  105. [113]

    Nautsch, A

    A. Nautsch, A. Jiménez, A. Treiber, J. Kolberg, C. Jasserand, E. Kindt, H. Delgado, M. Todisco, M. A. Hmani, A. Mtibaa, M. A. Abdelraheem, A. Abad, F. Teixeira, D. Matrouf, M. Gomez-Barrero, D. Petrovska-Delacrétaz, G. Chollet, N. Evans, T. Schneider, J.-F. Bonastre, B. Raj, I...

    2019

  106. [114]

    O’Brien, N

    B. O’Brien, N. Tomashenko, A. Chanclu, and J.-F. Bonastre, ``Anonymous speaker clusters: Making distinctions between anonymised speech recordings with clustering interface,'' in Interspeech 2021, 2021, pp. 3580--3584

    2021

  107. [115]

    Williams, K

    J. Williams, K. Pizzi, P.-G. Noe, and S. Das, ``Exploratory evaluation of speech content masking,'' in Speech Communication; 15th ITG Conference, 2023, pp. 215--219

    2023

  108. [116]

    Kamocki and I

    P. Kamocki and I. Siegert, ``Pseudonymisation of speech data as an alternative approach to GDPR compliance,'' in Proceedings of the Workshop on Ethical and Legal Issues in Human Language Technologies and Multilingual De-Identification of Sensitive Data In Language Resources wi...

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.