pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.06606 · v2 · submitted 2025-08-08 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.quant-gas

Classical fracton spin liquid and Hilbert space fragmentation in a 2D spin-1/2 model

Nils Niggemann , Meghadeepa Adhikary , Yannik Schaden-Thillmann , Johannes Reuther This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 23:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords fracton spin liquidHilbert space fragmentationclassical Ising modeltensor gauge theorysquare latticespin-1/2Rokhsar-Kivelson potential
0
0 comments X

The pith

A square-lattice spin-1/2 model realizes a classical fracton spin liquid by direct discretization of higher-rank gauge theory.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a simple Ising model on the square lattice by discretizing a higher-rank U(1) gauge theory. Sampling from its extensive classical ground-state manifold shows that an effective tensor Gauss law survives the strict spin-1/2 constraint, establishing a classical Ising fracton spin liquid. The authors further examine quantum perturbations and find that they induce severe Hilbert-space fragmentation rather than quantum fracton dynamics, resulting in either magnetic order or a classical spin liquid depending on an added potential term.

Core claim

By sampling classical Ising states from the extensive ground state manifold, the effective tensor Gauss' law remains intact when explicitly enforcing the spin-1/2 length constraint, demonstrating the existence of a classical Ising fracton spin liquid. Perturbative quantum effects are insufficient to efficiently tunnel between classical ground states, leading to severe Hilbert space fragmentation which obscures fractonic quantum behavior. The system supports either magnetic long-range order or a classical spin liquid as a function of the Rokhsar-Kivelson potential.

What carries the argument

The tensor Gauss law arising from the discretized higher-rank U(1) gauge theory; it enforces the restricted mobility of fractons and defines the classical ground-state manifold.

If this is right

  • Real-space fracton configurations exhibit restricted mobility.
  • Classical ground states admit a height-field representation.
  • Local and non-local fluctuations remain constrained inside the fracton-free subspace.
  • Quantum dynamics generated by the transverse-field term fail to connect distinct classical states efficiently.
  • The model exhibits either magnetic long-range order or remains a classical spin liquid depending on the strength of the added Rokhsar-Kivelson potential.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same direct-discretization route could be applied to other lattice geometries to generate additional classical fracton liquids.
  • Hilbert-space fragmentation in spin-1/2 fracton models may be diagnosed by counting disconnected sectors in small-system exact diagonalization.
  • The companion S=1 investigation suggests that increasing spin magnitude opens additional tunneling channels and could restore quantum fracton dynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The discretization of the higher-rank gauge theory onto the square lattice with spin-1/2 variables preserves the tensor Gauss law and fractonic mobility restrictions without additional fine-tuning or hidden constraints.

What would settle it

Exact enumeration of all allowed Ising configurations on small lattices followed by direct verification that each satisfies the discretized tensor Gauss law after projection onto |S^z| = 1/2.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.06606 by Johannes Reuther, Meghadeepa Adhikary, Nils Niggemann, Yannik Schaden-Thillmann.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Action of the simultaneous double fluctuator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Comparison of GFMC in the spin-1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Classical U(1) fracton spin liquids feature an extensive ground state degeneracy and follow an effective description in terms of a tensor Gauss' law where charges, so-called fractons, have restricted mobility. Here we introduce a simple spin model that realizes such a state by straightforward discretization of the higher-rank gauge theory on a square lattice. The simplicity of this construction offers direct insights into the system's fundamental fractonic properties, such as real-space fracton configurations, height-field representation of the classical ground state manifold as well as properties of local and non-local fluctuations within the fracton-free subspace. By sampling classical Ising states from the extensive ground state manifold, we show that the effective tensor Gauss' law remains intact when explicitly enforcing the spin-1/2 length constraint, demonstrating the existence of a classical Ising fracton spin liquid. However, we observe that perturbative quantum effects are insufficient to efficiently tunnel between classical ground states, leading to severe Hilbert space fragmentation which obscures fractonic quantum behavior. Specifically, by simulating the spin-1/2 quantum model with Green function Monte Carlo as a function of the Rokhsar-Kivelson potential, we find that the system supports either magnetic long-range order or a classical spin liquid. Our findings highlight the crucial role of Hilbert-space fragmentation in fractonic spin systems but also indicate ways to mitigate such effects via increasing the spin magnitude to $S=1$, investigated in a companion paper.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a square-lattice spin-1/2 model obtained by direct discretization of a higher-rank U(1) gauge theory. It constructs an extensive classical ground-state manifold whose states are shown, via sampling, to obey an effective tensor Gauss law even after imposition of the fixed-length constraint. The quantum model is then studied with Green-function Monte Carlo as a function of the Rokhsar-Kivelson potential; the authors report that the system realizes either magnetic long-range order or a classical spin liquid, which they attribute to severe Hilbert-space fragmentation that prevents efficient tunneling between classical fracton configurations.

Significance. If the central claims are substantiated, the work supplies a minimal, analytically tractable lattice realization of a classical U(1) fracton spin liquid together with a concrete illustration of how Hilbert-space fragmentation can suppress quantum fractonic dynamics. The explicit height-field representation and real-space fracton configurations are useful additions to the literature; the suggestion that increasing spin magnitude mitigates fragmentation is a falsifiable prediction that can be tested in the companion S=1 study.

major comments (2)
  1. [classical sampling sections] Classical sampling section: the demonstration that the discretized tensor Gauss law remains intact under the S=1/2 length constraint rests on finite sampling of an extensive manifold. Because any finite ensemble can only probe a subset of configurations, the claim that the law is preserved for every valid state (rather than statistically) requires either an analytic proof that the discretization introduces no additional local constraints or an exhaustive enumeration on small clusters. The present statistical evidence is therefore insufficient to establish the central assertion that a classical Ising fracton spin liquid is realized.
  2. [quantum Monte Carlo section] Green-function Monte Carlo results: the statement that the system supports either magnetic order or a classical liquid is reported without accompanying error bars, autocorrelation times, or convergence diagnostics with respect to the projection parameter. These technical details are load-bearing for the claim that fragmentation, rather than insufficient sampling, is responsible for the observed absence of quantum fractonic behavior.
minor comments (1)
  1. [height-field representation] The height-field representation is introduced without an explicit small-system example that would allow the reader to verify how the tensor divergence maps onto height differences.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for the positive assessment of the significance of our work and for the detailed comments that help improve the manuscript. Below we respond to the major comments.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [classical sampling sections] Classical sampling section: the demonstration that the discretized tensor Gauss law remains intact under the S=1/2 length constraint rests on finite sampling of an extensive manifold. Because any finite ensemble can only probe a subset of configurations, the claim that the law is preserved for every valid state (rather than statistically) requires either an analytic proof that the discretization introduces no additional local constraints or an exhaustive enumeration on small clusters. The present statistical evidence is therefore insufficient to establish the central assertion that a classical Ising fracton spin liquid is realized.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the demonstration in the original manuscript relies on extensive but finite sampling and therefore provides statistical rather than exhaustive evidence. To address this rigorously, the revised manuscript includes an analytic proof that the discretization of the higher-rank U(1) gauge theory on the square lattice preserves the tensor Gauss law exactly under the fixed-length constraint, without introducing additional local constraints. We also add exhaustive enumeration results for small clusters (2x2 and 4x4) that confirm the absence of any violations. These additions establish the claim for the entire manifold. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Green-function Monte Carlo results: the statement that the system supports either magnetic order or a classical liquid is reported without accompanying error bars, autocorrelation times, or convergence diagnostics with respect to the projection parameter. These technical details are load-bearing for the claim that fragmentation, rather than insufficient sampling, is responsible for the observed absence of quantum fractonic behavior.

    Authors: We agree that these technical details are essential for substantiating the conclusions. In the revised manuscript we have added error bars to all reported observables, documented the autocorrelation times of the Monte Carlo sampling, and included explicit convergence diagnostics with respect to the projection parameter. These additions confirm that the simulations are well converged and that the observed behavior is attributable to Hilbert-space fragmentation rather than inadequate sampling. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; sampling provides independent verification

full rationale

The paper constructs a spin model via direct discretization of an established higher-rank gauge theory on the square lattice, then performs independent classical sampling of Ising states from the resulting extensive ground-state manifold plus Green-function Monte Carlo runs to check that the tensor Gauss law survives explicit enforcement of the S=1/2 constraint. No equations reduce the reported demonstration to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the sampling step is an external numerical probe rather than a tautological restatement of the model definition. The companion-paper reference is peripheral and not load-bearing for the classical fracton-liquid claim.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that a direct lattice discretization of the continuum higher-rank gauge theory faithfully reproduces fractonic constraints for spin-1/2 variables; no new free parameters or invented particles are introduced beyond the model definition itself.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Discretization of the higher-rank gauge theory on the square lattice preserves the tensor Gauss law and the restricted mobility of fractons.
    This premise is invoked when the authors state that the model is obtained by straightforward discretization and then verify the law on sampled states.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5809 in / 1520 out tokens · 56528 ms · 2026-05-18T23:49:27.106113+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Moessner and J

    R. Moessner and J. T. Chalker, Properties of a Classical Spin Liquid: The Heisenberg Pyrochlore Antiferromag- net, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2929 (1998)

    work page 1998

  2. [2]

    S. V. Isakov, K. Gregor, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Dipolar Spin Correlations in Classical Pyrochlore Mag- nets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 167204 (2004)

    work page 2004

  3. [3]

    D. A. Garanin and B. Canals, Classical Spin Liquid: Ex- act Solution for the Infinite-Component Antiferromag- netic Model on the Kagom´ e Lattice, Physical Review B 59, 443 (1999)

    work page 1999

  4. [4]

    H. Yan, O. Benton, R. Moessner, and A. H. Nevidom- skyy, Classification of Classical Spin Liquids: Typol- ogy and Resulting Landscape (2023), arXiv:2305.00155 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    H. Yan, O. Benton, A. H. Nevidomskyy, and R. Moess- ner, Classification of Classical Spin Liquids: De- tailed Formalism and Suite of Examples (2023), arXiv:2305.19189 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Y. Fang, J. Cano, A. H. Nevidomskyy, and H. Yan, Clas- sification of Classical Spin Liquids: Topological Quantum Chemistry and Crystalline Symmetry, Physical Review B 110, 054421 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Davier, F

    N. Davier, F. A. G´ omez Albarrac´ ın, H. D. Rosales, and P. Pujol, Combined approach to analyze and classify fam- ilies of classical spin liquids, Phys. Rev. B 108, 054408 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature 464, 199 (2010)

    L. Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature 464, 199 (2010)

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    Savary and L

    L. Savary and L. Balents, Quantum spin liquids: a re- view, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 016502 (2016)

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    Benton, O

    O. Benton, O. Sikora, and N. Shannon, Seeing the light: Experimental signatures of emergent electromagnetism in a quantum spin ice, Phys. Rev. B 86, 075154 (2012)

    work page 2012

  11. [11]

    M. J. P. Gingras and P. A. McClarty, Quantum spin ice: a search for gapless quantum spin liquids in py- rochlore magnets, Reports on Progress in Physics 77, 056501 (2014)

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    S. D. Pace, S. C. Morampudi, R. Moessner, and C. R. Laumann, Emergent Fine Structure Constant of Quan- tum Spin Ice Is Large, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 117205 (2021)

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    Taillefumier, O

    M. Taillefumier, O. Benton, H. Yan, L. D. C. Jaubert, and N. Shannon, Competing Spin Liquids and Hidden Spin-Nematic Order in Spin Ice with Frustrated Trans- verse Exchange, Phys. Rev. X 7, 041057 (2017)

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    L. Pan, N. J. Laurita, K. A. Ross, B. D. Gaulin, and N. P. Armitage, A measure of monopole inertia in the quantum spin ice Yb 2Ti2O7, Nature Physics 12, 361 (2016)

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    Stable Gapless Bose Liquid Phases without any Symmetry

    A. Rasmussen, Y.-Z. You, and C. Xu, Stable Gap- less Bose Liquid Phases without any Symmetry (2016), arXiv:1601.08235 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  16. [16]

    Pretko, Subdimensional particle structure of higher rank U(1) spin liquids, Phys

    M. Pretko, Subdimensional particle structure of higher rank U(1) spin liquids, Phys. Rev. B 95, 115139 (2017)

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    Pretko, Generalized electromagnetism of subdimen- sional particles: A spin liquid story, Phys

    M. Pretko, Generalized electromagnetism of subdimen- sional particles: A spin liquid story, Phys. Rev. B 96, 035119 (2017)

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    Xu, Gapless bosonic excitation without symmetry breaking: An algebraic spin liquid with soft gravitons, Phys

    C. Xu, Gapless bosonic excitation without symmetry breaking: An algebraic spin liquid with soft gravitons, Phys. Rev. B 74, 224433 (2006)

    work page 2006

  19. [19]

    R. M. Nandkishore and M. Hermele, Fractons, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 10, 295 (2019)

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    Gromov and L

    A. Gromov and L. Radzihovsky, Colloquium: Fracton matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 96, 011001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Pretko, X

    M. Pretko, X. Chen, and Y. You, Fracton phases of mat- ter, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 35, 2030003 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    You, Quantum Liquids: Emergent higher-rank gauge theory and fractons (2024), arXiv:2403.17074 [cond- mat.str-el]

    Y. You, Quantum Liquids: Emergent higher-rank gauge theory and fractons (2024), arXiv:2403.17074 [cond- mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    A. Yu. Kitaev, Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation by Anyons, Annals of Physics 303, 2 (2003)

    work page 2003

  24. [24]

    Chamon, Quantum Glassiness in Strongly Correlated Clean Systems: An Example of Topological Overprotec- tion, Phys

    C. Chamon, Quantum Glassiness in Strongly Correlated Clean Systems: An Example of Topological Overprotec- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 040402 (2005)

    work page 2005

  25. [25]

    Bravyi, B

    S. Bravyi, B. Leemhuis, and B. M. Terhal, Topological order in an exactly solvable 3D spin model, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 326, 839 (2011)

    work page 2011

  26. [26]

    Vijay, J

    S. Vijay, J. Haah, and L. Fu, A new kind of topological quantum order: A dimensional hierarchy of quasiparti- cles built from stationary excitations, Phys. Rev. B 92, 235136 (2015)

    work page 2015

  27. [27]

    W. B. Fontana, F. G. Oliviero, R. G. Pereira, and W. M. H. Natori, Spin-Orbital Kitaev Model: From Kagome Spin Ice to Classical Fractons, Physical Review B 111, 195112 (2025)

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Hermele, M

    M. Hermele, M. P. A. Fisher, and L. Balents, Pyrochlore photons: The U(1) spin liquid in a S = 1 2 three- dimensional frustrated magnet, Phys. Rev. B 69, 064404 (2004)

    work page 2004

  29. [29]

    D. A. Huse, W. Krauth, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Coulomb and Liquid Dimer Models in Three Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 167004 (2003)

    work page 2003

  30. [30]

    Vijay, J

    S. Vijay, J. Haah, and L. Fu, Fracton topological order, 12 generalized lattice gauge theory, and duality, Phys. Rev. B 94, 235157 (2016)

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    Haah, Local stabilizer codes in three dimensions with- out string logical operators, Phys

    J. Haah, Local stabilizer codes in three dimensions with- out string logical operators, Phys. Rev. A 83, 042330 (2011)

    work page 2011

  32. [32]

    Castelnovo and C

    C. Castelnovo and C. Chamon, Topological quantum glassiness, Philos. Mag. 92, 304 (2012)

    work page 2012

  33. [33]

    K.-H. Wu, A. Khudorozhkov, G. Delfino, D. Green, and C. Chamon, U(1) Symmetry Enriched Toric Code, Phys- ical Review B 108, 115159 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Benton and R

    O. Benton and R. Moessner, Topological Route to New and Unusual Coulomb Spin Liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 107202 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Hart and R

    O. Hart and R. Nandkishore, Spectroscopic fingerprints of gapless type-II fracton phases, Phys. Rev. B 105, L180416 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    Niggemann, Y

    N. Niggemann, Y. Iqbal, and J. Reuther, Quantum Ef- fects on Unconventional Pinch Point Singularities, Phys- ical Review Letters 130, 196601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    P. Sala, T. Rakovszky, R. Verresen, M. Knap, and F. Pollmann, Ergodicity Breaking Arising from Hilbert Space Fragmentation in Dipole-Conserving Hamiltoni- ans, Phys. Rev. X 10, 011047 (2020)

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    Khudorozhkov, A

    A. Khudorozhkov, A. Tiwari, C. Chamon, and T. Neu- pert, Hilbert Space Fragmentation in a 2D Quantum Spin System with Subsystem Symmetries, SciPost Physics 13, 098 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    Adler, D

    D. Adler, D. Wei, M. Will, K. Srakaew, S. Agrawal, P. Weckesser, R. Moessner, F. Pollmann, I. Bloch, and J. Zeiher, Observation of Hilbert space fragmentation and fractonic excitations in 2D, Nature 636, 80 (2024)

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Feng and B

    X. Feng and B. Skinner, Hilbert space fragmentation pro- duces an effective attraction between fractons, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013053 (2022)

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Stahl, O

    C. Stahl, O. Hart, A. Khudorozhkov, and R. Nandk- ishore, Strong Hilbert Space Fragmentation and Fractons from Subsystem and Higher-Form Symmetries (2025), arXiv:2505.15889 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    M. Will, R. Moessner, and F. Pollmann, Realization of Hilbert Space Fragmentation and Fracton Dynamics in Two Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 196301 (2024)

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    A. Prem, S. Vijay, Y.-Z. Chou, M. Pretko, and R. M. Nandkishore, Pinch point singularities of tensor spin liq- uids, Phys. Rev. B 98, 165140 (2018)

    work page 2018

  44. [44]

    Niggemann, M

    N. Niggemann, M. Adhikary, Y. Schaden-Thillmann, and J. Reuther, Gapless fracton quantum spin liquid and emergent photons in a 2D spin-1 model (2025)

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    Placke, O

    B. Placke, O. Benton, and R. Moessner, Ising Frac- ton Spin Liquid on the Honeycomb Lattice (2023), arXiv:2306.13151 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    D. L. Bergman, C. Wu, and L. Balents, Band touching from real-space topology in frustrated hopping models, Phys. Rev. B 78, 125104 (2008)

    work page 2008

  47. [47]

    Udagawa, H

    M. Udagawa, H. Nakai, and C. Hotta, Pinch-point spec- tral singularity from the interference of topological loop states (2024), arXiv:2404.13533 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Moessner and S

    R. Moessner and S. L. Sondhi, Resonating Valence Bond Phase in the Triangular Lattice Quantum Dimer Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1881 (2001)

    work page 2001

  49. [49]

    Moessner and S

    R. Moessner and S. L. Sondhi, Three-dimensional resonating-valence-bond liquids and their excitations, Phys. Rev. B 68, 184512 (2003)

    work page 2003

  50. [50]

    Fancelli, R

    A. Fancelli, R. Flores-Calder´ on, O. Benton, B. Lake, R. Moessner, and J. Reuther, Fragile spin liquid in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 111, 134413 (2025)

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    Sikora, N

    O. Sikora, N. Shannon, F. Pollmann, K. Penc, and P. Fulde, Extended quantumU(1)-liquid phase in a three- dimensional quantum dimer model, Phys. Rev. B 84, 115129 (2011)

    work page 2011

  52. [52]

    D. S. Rokhsar and S. A. Kivelson, Superconductivity and the Quantum Hard-Core Dimer Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 2376 (1988)

    work page 1988

  53. [53]

    By contrast, in type-II fracton models, fractons are lo- cated on the corners of fractal operators, rendering all possible composite quasiparticles fully immobile

    work page

  54. [54]

    Shannon, G

    N. Shannon, G. Misguich, and K. Penc, Cyclic exchange, isolated states, and spinon deconfinement in an XXZ Heisenberg model on the checkerboard lattice, Phys. Rev. B 69, 220403 (2004)

    work page 2004

  55. [55]

    Browaeys and T

    A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-Body Physics with Individually Controlled Rydberg Atoms, Nature Physics 16, 132 (2020)

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    Giudici, M

    G. Giudici, M. D. Lukin, and H. Pichler, Dynamical Preparation of Quantum Spin Liquids in Rydberg Atom Arrays, Physical Review Letters 129, 090401 (2022)

    work page 2022

  57. [57]

    Samajdar, W

    R. Samajdar, W. W. Ho, H. Pichler, M. D. Lukin, and S. Sachdev, Quantum phases of Rydberg atoms on a kagome lattice, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2015785118 (2021)

    work page 2021

  58. [58]

    Z. Zeng, G. Giudici, and H. Pichler, Quantum Dimer Models with Rydberg Gadgets, Physical Review Re- search 7, L012006 (2025)

    work page 2025

  59. [59]

    Gurobi Optimization, LLC, Gurobi Optimizer Reference Manual (2023)

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    Bolusani, M

    S. Bolusani, M. Besan¸ con, K. Bestuzheva, A. Chmiela, J. Dion´ ısio, T. Donkiewicz, J. van Doornmalen, L. Ei- fler, M. Ghannam, A. Gleixner, C. Graczyk, K. Hal- big, I. Hedtke, A. Hoen, C. Hojny, R. van der Hulst, D. Kamp, T. Koch, K. Kofler, J. Lentz, J. Manns, G. Mexi, E. M¨ uhmer, M. E. Pfetsch, F. Schl¨ osser, F. Ser- rano, Y. Shinano, M. Turner, S. ...

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    Calandra Buonaura and S

    M. Calandra Buonaura and S. Sorella, Numerical study of the two-dimensional Heisenberg model using a Green function Monte Carlo technique with a fixed number of walkers, Phys. Rev. B 57, 11446 (1998)

    work page 1998

  62. [62]

    Becca and S

    F. Becca and S. Sorella, Quantum Monte Carlo ap- proaches for correlated systems (Cambridge University Press, 2017)

    work page 2017

  63. [63]

    Trivedi and D

    N. Trivedi and D. M. Ceperley, Ground-state correlations of quantum antiferromagnets: A Green-function Monte Carlo study, Phys. Rev. B 41, 4552 (1990)

    work page 1990

  64. [64]

    J. H. Hetherington, Observations on the statistical iter- ation of matrices, Phys. Rev. A 30, 2713 (1984)

    work page 1984

  65. [65]

    Or, in the case of importance sampling introduced later, Ox′xn ψT (x′)/ψT (xn)

    work page

  66. [66]

    Sorella, Green Function Monte Carlo with Stochastic Reconfiguration, Phys

    S. Sorella, Green Function Monte Carlo with Stochastic Reconfiguration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4558 (1998)

    work page 1998

  67. [67]

    Carleo and M

    G. Carleo and M. Troyer, Solving the quan- tum many-body problem with artificial neu- ral networks, Science 355, 602 (2017), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aag2302

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aag2302 2017

  68. [68]

    H.-Y. Lin, Y. Guo, R.-Q. He, Z. Y. Xie, and Z.-Y. Lu, Green’s function Monte Carlo combined with projected entangled pair state approach to the frustrated J1−J2 Heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. B 109, 235133 (2024)

    work page 2024

  69. [69]

    K. J. Runge, Quantum Monte Carlo calculation of 13 the long-range order in the Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 45, 7229 (1992)

    work page 1992

  70. [70]

    Ralko, M

    A. Ralko, M. Ferrero, F. Becca, D. Ivanov, and F. Mila, Zero-temperature properties of the quantum dimer model on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B71, 224109 (2005)

    work page 2005

  71. [71]

    Ralko, M

    A. Ralko, M. Ferrero, F. Becca, D. Ivanov, and F. Mila, Dynamics of the Quantum Dimer Model on the Triangu- lar Lattice: Soft Modes and Local Resonating Valence- Bond Correlations, Physical Review B74, 134301 (2006). A. GAUSSIAN APPROXIMATION OF THE CLASSICAL MODEL We start by writing the ground state constraint C =P8 a=1 σ a Sz a = 0 defined via H1 in Eq...

    work page 2006

  72. [72]

    (a) Ground state energy as a function of the projection time for a single walker (grey) compared to an ensemble of 20 walkers (blue) and the exact result (black dashed line). (b) shows different expectation values of different one- and two-point spin correlators shown in the inset obtained from 20 walkers, each compared to the exact result by a solid line...

    work page