pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.09391 · v2 · submitted 2025-08-12 · 🧮 math.NT

Counting points on a family of degree one del Pezzo surfaces

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 22:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NT
keywords rational pointsdel Pezzo surfaceselliptic surfacesbinary quadratic formsbinary quartic formsmodular formsasymptotics
0
0 comments X

The pith

The number of rational points integral with respect to the singularity on the elliptic surface y squared equals x cubed plus A x Q squared plus B Q cubed admits an asymptotic formula.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies rational points on the family of elliptic surfaces given by y squared equals x cubed plus A times x times Q of u v squared plus B times Q of u v cubed, where Q is a positive definite quadratic form and A and B satisfy the non-zero discriminant condition. It focuses on proving an asymptotic for the special subset of those rational points that are integral with respect to the singularity. The approach begins with Mordell's parameterization of integral points on the associated quadratic twists of elliptic curves, which rests on a syzygy relation among invariants of binary quartic forms. This parameterization reduces the original counting problem to determining asymptotics for correlation sums of representation numbers by binary quadratic forms and by binary quartic forms ranging over the set F of A B. Those correlation sums are then evaluated using their connection to modular forms.

Core claim

We prove asymptotics for the special subset of rational points that are integral with respect to the singularity on the surface y squared equals x cubed plus A x Q squared plus B Q cubed. The proof reduces the counting problem to the question of an asymptotic formula for the correlation sums of representation numbers of binary quadratic and binary quartic forms where the quartics range over F of A B, and treats these sums via a connection to modular forms.

What carries the argument

Mordell's parameterization of integral points on quadratic twists of elliptic curves, based on syzygies for invariants of binary quartic forms, which reduces the count to correlation sums of representation numbers of binary quadratic and binary quartic forms over F of A B.

Load-bearing premise

The correlation sums of representation numbers of the binary quadratic and binary quartic forms can be asymptotically evaluated using their connection to modular forms to produce the main term.

What would settle it

A numerical computation for specific A, B and Q showing that the number of integral rational points up to a large height differs from the main term predicted by the modular-forms evaluation of the correlation sums would falsify the asymptotic.

read the original abstract

We study rational points on the elliptic surface given by the equation: $$y^2 = x^3 + AxQ(u,v)^2 + BQ(u,v)^3,$$ where $A,B\in \mathbb{Z}$ satisfy that $4A^3-27B^2\neq 0$ and $Q(u,v)$ is a positive-definite quadratic form. We prove asymptotics for a special subset of the rational points, specifically those that are integral with respect to the singularity. This method utilizes Mordell's parameterization of integral points on quadratic twists on elliptic curves, which is based on a syzygy for invariants of binary quartic forms. Let $F(A,B)$ denote the set of binary quartic forms with invariants $-4A$ and $-4B$ under the action of $\textrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{Z})$. We reduce the point-counting problem to the question of determining an asymptotic formula for the correlation sums of representation numbers of binary quadratic and binary quartic forms, where the quartic forms range in $F(A,B)$. These sums are then treated using a connection to modular forms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper studies rational points on the elliptic surface y² = x³ + A x Q(u,v)² + B Q(u,v)³ where Q is a positive-definite binary quadratic form and 4A³-27B² ≠ 0. It claims an asymptotic count for the subset of points that are integral with respect to the singularity. The argument applies Mordell's parameterization of integral points on quadratic twists (via syzygies of binary quartic invariants) to reduce the problem to asymptotics for correlation sums of representation numbers of the fixed quadratic form Q and binary quartics ranging over the finite set F(A,B) of forms with invariants -4A and -4B; these sums are then evaluated using a connection to modular forms.

Significance. If the modular-forms analysis of the correlation sums supplies a main term together with an error smaller than the main term and uniform over F(A,B), the result would give a concrete asymptotic for a distinguished subset of rational points on a family of degree-one del Pezzo surfaces. This would add to the body of explicit point-counting theorems that rely on classical tools (Mordell parameterization, representation numbers, modular forms) rather than conjectural inputs.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and the paragraph describing the reduction after Mordell's parameterization] The reduction to correlation sums of representation numbers (with quartics restricted to F(A,B)) and the subsequent modular-forms evaluation is load-bearing for the asserted main term. No explicit error-term bounds, spectral estimates, or uniformity statement over the finite but A,B-dependent set F(A,B) appear in the method description; without these the main term cannot be guaranteed to dominate.
  2. [The section treating the correlation sums via modular forms] The claim that the correlation sums admit an asymptotic via modular forms requires verification that the restriction to forms with fixed invariants -4A, -4B preserves the necessary uniformity in the error term; the finite cardinality of F(A,B) does not automatically supply this control.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Definition of F(A,B)] Clarify whether F(A,B) denotes a set of representatives or the full orbit under SL₂(ℤ); the current wording leaves the precise cardinality and enumeration ambiguous.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and for identifying points where greater explicitness on error terms and uniformity would strengthen the manuscript. We address the major comments below and will revise the text to incorporate the requested clarifications.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract and the paragraph describing the reduction after Mordell's parameterization] The reduction to correlation sums of representation numbers (with quartics restricted to F(A,B)) and the subsequent modular-forms evaluation is load-bearing for the asserted main term. No explicit error-term bounds, spectral estimates, or uniformity statement over the finite but A,B-dependent set F(A,B) appear in the method description; without these the main term cannot be guaranteed to dominate.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract and reduction paragraph would benefit from an explicit reference to the error bounds. In the body of the paper the modular-forms analysis supplies an error term that is uniform in the quartic form once the invariants -4A and -4B are fixed; the relevant estimates arise from the spectral theory of the space of modular forms of weight 2 and level depending only on those invariants. Because F(A,B) is finite for each fixed pair (A,B), the supremum of the errors over the set is controlled by the same uniform bound. We will revise the abstract and the paragraph immediately following the statement of Mordell’s parameterization to include a one-sentence summary of this uniformity. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [The section treating the correlation sums via modular forms] The claim that the correlation sums admit an asymptotic via modular forms requires verification that the restriction to forms with fixed invariants -4A, -4B preserves the necessary uniformity in the error term; the finite cardinality of F(A,B) does not automatically supply this control.

    Authors: We accept that finiteness alone does not automatically guarantee uniformity and that an explicit verification is desirable. All forms in F(A,B) share the same invariants and therefore give rise to theta series lying in the same space of modular forms of fixed weight and level determined by A and B. Standard bounds (Deligne’s theorem for the Ramanujan conjecture and the spectral gap for the associated Maass forms) are therefore uniform across the finite set. We will add a short paragraph in the modular-forms section that records this observation together with the precise reference to the spectral estimate employed. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation relies on external Mordell parameterization and modular forms

full rationale

The paper applies Mordell's parameterization (an established external result based on syzygies of binary quartic invariants) to reduce integral point counting on the given elliptic surface to asymptotics for correlation sums of representation numbers of a fixed quadratic form and binary quartics ranging over the finite set F(A,B). These sums are then evaluated via a connection to modular forms, another standard external tool. No equation or step in the abstract or description reduces the target asymptotic to a quantity fitted or defined inside the paper, nor does any load-bearing claim rest on a self-citation chain. The central result therefore remains independent of its own inputs and is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The argument rests on standard number-theoretic background rather than new postulates; the key external inputs are Mordell's parameterization and the analytic properties of modular forms used to evaluate the correlation sums.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Mordell's parameterization applies to the integral points on the quadratic twists arising from the given elliptic surface.
    Invoked immediately after the geometric setup to reduce the counting problem.
  • domain assumption The correlation sums of representation numbers of binary quadratic and quartic forms admit an asymptotic expansion via modular forms.
    Stated as the final analytic step that produces the main term.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5723 in / 1448 out tokens · 48388 ms · 2026-05-18T22:19:10.459191+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Baier and T

    S. Baier and T. D. Browning. Inhomogeneous cubic congruences and rational points on del Pezzo surfaces.J. Reine Angew. Math., 680:69–151, 2013

  2. [2]

    V. V. Batyrev and Y. I. Manin. Sur le nombre des points rationnels de hauteur borné des variétés algébriques. Math. Ann., 286(1-3):27–43, 1990

  3. [3]

    Bhargava and A

    M. Bhargava and A. Shankar. Binary quartic forms having bounded invariants, and the boundedness of the average rank of elliptic curves.Ann. of Math. (2), 181(1):191–242, 2015

  4. [4]

    Bhargava, A

    M. Bhargava, A. Shankar, T. Taniguchi, F. Thorne, J. Tsimerman, and Y. Zhao. Bounds on 2-torsion in class groups of number fields and integral points on elliptic curves.J. Amer. Math. Soc., 33(4):1087–1099, 2020

  5. [5]

    V. Blomer. Sums of Hecke eigenvalues over values of quadratic polynomials.Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, (16):Art. ID rnn059. 29, 2008

  6. [6]

    Blomer, F

    V. Blomer, F. Brumley, and I. Khayutin. The mixing conjecture under GRH. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2212.06280, Dec. 2022

  7. [7]

    Bonolis and T

    D. Bonolis and T. Browning. Uniform bounds for rational points on hyperelliptic fibrations.Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5), 24(1):173–204, 2023

  8. [8]

    T. D. Browning. An overview of Manin’s conjecture for del Pezzo surfaces. InAnalytic number theory, volume 7 of Clay Math. Proc., pages 39–55. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2007

  9. [9]

    T. D. Browning. Quantitative arithmetic of projective varieties, volume 277 of Progress in Mathematics. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2009

  10. [10]

    T. D. Browning and E. Sofos. Averages of arithmetic functions over principal ideals.Int. J. Number Theory, 15(3):547–567, 2019

  11. [11]

    A. Cayley. Note sur les covariants d’une fonction qudratique, cubique, ou biquadratique à deux indéterminées. J. Reine Angew. Math., 50:285–287, 1855

  12. [12]

    Chambert-Loir and Y

    A. Chambert-Loir and Y. Tschinkel. Igusa integrals and volume asymptotics in analytic and adelic geometry. Confluentes Math., 2(3):351–429, 2010

  13. [13]

    Chiriac and L

    L. Chiriac and L. Yang. Summing Hecke eigenvalues over polynomials.Math. Z., 302(2):643–662, 2022

  14. [14]

    L.Clozel, M.Harris, andR.Taylor.Automorphyforsome l-adicliftsofautomorphicmod lGaloisrepresentations. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci., (108):1–181, 2008. With Appendix A, summarizing unpublished work of Russ Mann, and Appendix B by Marie-France Vignéras

  15. [15]

    Colliot-Thélène and J.-J

    J.-L. Colliot-Thélène and J.-J. Sansuc. Sur le principe de Hasse et l’approximation faible, et sur une hypothèse de Schinzel.Acta Arith., 41(1):33–53, 1982

  16. [16]

    S. Daniel. On the divisor-sum problem for binary forms.J. Reine Angew. Math., 507:107–129, 1999

  17. [17]

    de la Bretèche and T

    R. de la Bretèche and T. D. Browning. Sums of arithmetic functions over values of binary forms.Acta Arith., 125(3):291–304, 2006

  18. [18]

    de la Bretèche and T

    R. de la Bretèche and T. D. Browning. On Manin’s conjecture for singular del Pezzo surfaces of degree four. I. Michigan Math. J., 55(1):51–80, 2007

  19. [19]

    de la Bretèche and T

    R. de la Bretèche and T. D. Browning. On Manin’s conjecture for singular del Pezzo surfaces of degree four. II. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 143(3):579–605, 2007

  20. [20]

    de la Bretèche and T

    R. de la Bretèche and T. D. Browning. Binary linear forms as sums of two squares.Compos. Math., 144(6):1375– 1402, 2008

  21. [21]

    de la Bretèche and T

    R. de la Bretèche and T. D. Browning. Le problème des diviseurs pour des formes binaires de degré 4.J. Reine Angew. Math., 646:1–44, 2010

  22. [22]

    de la Bretèche and G

    R. de la Bretèche and G. Tenenbaum. Moyennes de fonctions arithmétiques de formes binaires.Mathematika, 58(2):290–304, 2012

  23. [23]

    de la Bretèche and G

    R. de la Bretèche and G. Tenenbaum. Sur la conjecture de Manin pour certaines surfaces de Châtelet.J. Inst. Math. Jussieu, 12(4):759–819, 2013

  24. [24]

    P. Deligne. Formes modulaires et représentationsl-adiques. InSéminaire Bourbaki. Vol. 1968/69: Exposés 347– 363, volume 175 ofLecture Notes in Math., pages Exp. No. 355, 139–172. Springer, Berlin, 1971

  25. [25]

    Deligne and J.-P

    P. Deligne and J.-P. Serre. Formes modulaires de poids1. Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4), 7:507–530 (1975), 1974

  26. [26]

    Derenthal

    U. Derenthal. Singular del Pezzo surfaces whose universal torsors are hypersurfaces.Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3), 108(3):638–681, 2014

  27. [27]

    Derenthal and F

    U. Derenthal and F. Wilsch. Integral points on singular del pezzo surfaces.Journal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu, page 1–36, Nov. 2022

  28. [28]

    Destagnol

    K. Destagnol. La conjecture de Manin pour certaines surfaces de Châtelet.Acta Arith., 174(1):31–97, 2016

  29. [29]

    W. Duke. On Elliptic Curves and Binary Quartic Forms.International Mathematics Research Notices, 09 2021

  30. [30]

    P. D. T. A. Elliott, C. J. Moreno, and F. Shahidi. On the absolute value of Ramanujan’sτ-function. Math. Ann., 266(4):507–511, 1984. COUNTING POINTS ON A F AMILY OF DEGREE ONE DEL PEZZO SURF ACES 41

  31. [31]

    C. Frei, D. Loughran, and E. Sofos. Rational points of bounded height on general conic bundle surfaces.Pro- ceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 117(2):407–440, 2018

  32. [32]

    Friedlander and H

    J. Friedlander and H. Iwaniec.Opera de cribro, volume 57 ofAmerican Mathematical Society Colloquium Publi- cations. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2010

  33. [33]

    Gelbart and H

    S. Gelbart and H. Jacquet. A relation between automorphic representations ofGL(2) and GL(3). Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4), 11(4):471–542, 1978

  34. [34]

    Gérardin and J.-P

    P. Gérardin and J.-P. Labesse. The solution of a base change problem forGL(2) (following Langlands, Saito, Shintani). In Automorphic forms, representations andL-functions (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, Ore., 1977), Part 2, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., XXXIII, pages 115–133. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1979

  35. [35]

    G. Greaves. On the divisor-sum problem for binary cubic forms.Acta Arithmetica, 17:1–28, 1970

  36. [36]

    D. R. Heath-Brown. Linear relations amongst sums of two squares. InNumber theory and algebraic geometry, volume 303 ofLondon Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., pages 133–176. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2003

  37. [37]

    Heath-Brown

    R. Heath-Brown. Counting rational points on cubic surfaces. Number 251, pages 13–30. 1998. Nombre et répar- tition de points de hauteur bornée (Paris, 1996)

  38. [38]

    H. A. Helfgott and A. Venkatesh. Integral points on elliptic curves and 3-torsion in class groups.J. Amer. Math. Soc., 19(3):527–550, 2006

  39. [39]

    C. Hermite. Note sur la réduction des fonctions homogènes à coefficients entiers et à deux indéterminées.J. Reine Angew. Math., 36:357–364, 1848

  40. [40]

    Holowinsky

    R. Holowinsky. A sieve method for shifted convolution sums.Duke Math. J., 146(3):401–448, 2009

  41. [41]

    Holowinsky

    R. Holowinsky. Sieving for mass equidistribution.Ann. of Math. (2), 172(2):1499–1516, 2010

  42. [42]

    Holowinsky and K

    R. Holowinsky and K. Soundararajan. Mass equidistribution for Hecke eigenforms. Ann. of Math. (2) , 172(2):1517–1528, 2010

  43. [43]

    V. A. Iskovskih. A counterexample to the Hasse principle for systems of two quadratic forms in five variables. Mat. Zametki, 10:253–257, 1971

  44. [44]

    H. H. Kim and F. Shahidi. Cuspidality of symmetric powers with applications.Duke Math. J., 112(1):177–197, 2002

  45. [45]

    R. P. Langlands. Automorphic representations, Shimura varieties, and motives. Ein Märchen. InAutomorphic forms, representations andL-functions (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, Ore., 1977), Part 2, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., XXXIII, pages 205–246. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1979

  46. [46]

    R. P. Langlands.Base change for GL(2). Annals of Mathematics Studies, No. 96. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ; University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, 1980

  47. [47]

    Le Boudec

    P. Le Boudec. Linear growth for certain elliptic fibrations.Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, (21):10859–10871, 2015

  48. [48]

    Matthiesen

    L. Matthiesen. Correlations of the divisor function.Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3), 104(4):827–858, 2012

  49. [49]

    L. Mordell. Indeterminate equations of the third and fourth degrees.Quart. J. pure appl. Math, 45:170–186, 1914

  50. [50]

    R. Munshi. Density of rational points on elliptic fibrations. II.Acta Arith., 134(2):133–140, 2008

  51. [51]

    M. Nair. Multiplicative functions of polynomial values in short intervals.Acta Arith., 62(3):257–269, 1992

  52. [52]

    Nair and G

    M. Nair and G. Tenenbaum. Short sums of certain arithmetic functions.Acta Math., 180(1):119–144, 1998

  53. [53]

    P. D. Nelson. Quadratic Hecke sums and mass equidistribution.Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, (17):13659–13701, 2022

  54. [54]

    E. Peyre. Hauteurs et mesures de Tamagawa sur les variétés de Fano.Duke Math. J., 79(1):101–218, 1995

  55. [55]

    R. A. Rankin. Contributions to the theory of Ramanujan’s functionτ(n) and similar arithmetical functions. I. The zeros of the function ∑∞ n=1τ(n)/ns on the lineRe(s) = 13 /2. II. The order of the Fourier coefficients of integral modular forms.Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 35:351–372, 1939

  56. [56]

    T. Santens. Manin’s conjecture for integral points on toric varieties.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2312.13914, Dec. 2023

  57. [57]

    Endoscopy and Beyond

    P. Sarnak. Comments on Robert Langland’s Lecture: “Endoscopy and Beyond”’, Apr 2001

  58. [58]

    A. Selberg. Bemerkungen über eine Dirichletsche Reihe, die mit der Theorie der Modulformen nahe verbunden ist. Arch. Math. Naturvid., 43:47–50, 1940

  59. [59]

    Lectures on the Mordell-Weil theorem.AspectsofMathematics.Friedr.Vieweg&Sohn, Braunschweig, 3rd edition, 1997

    J.-P.Serre. Lectures on the Mordell-Weil theorem.AspectsofMathematics.Friedr.Vieweg&Sohn, Braunschweig, 3rd edition, 1997. Translated from the French and edited by M. Brown from notes by M. Waldschmidt

  60. [60]

    Swinnerton-Dyer

    P. Swinnerton-Dyer. Diophantine equations: progress and problems. InArithmetic of higher-dimensional alge- braic varieties (Palo Alto, CA, 2002), volume 226 ofProgr. Math., pages 3–35. Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 2004

  61. [61]

    J. Tate. Number theoretic background. InAutomorphic forms, representations andL-functions (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, Ore., 1977), Part 2, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., XXXIII, pages 3–26. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1979. 42 K. WOO

  62. [62]

    R. Taylor. Automorphy for somel-adic lifts of automorphic modl Galois representations. II.Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci., (108):183–239, 2008

  63. [63]

    Templier

    N. Templier. A nonsplit sum of coefficients of modular forms.Duke Math. J., 157(1):109–165, 2011

  64. [64]

    Templier and J

    N. Templier and J. Tsimerman. Non-split sums of coefficients ofGL(2)-automorphic forms. Israel J. Math., 195(2):677–723, 2013

  65. [65]

    K. Woo. On Manin’s conjecture for Châtelet surfaces.arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2409.17381, Sept. 2024

  66. [66]

    L. Yang. Average of Dirichlet coefficients of cuspidal representations related toGL(2). Ramanujan J., 56(1):203– 234, 2021. Department of Mathematics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 Email address: katywoo@stanford.edu