Stingrays in the radio sky: Two unusual diffuse radio relic sources in the direction of the Magellanic Stream

Aaron C Bradley; Andrew M Hopkins; Barbel S Koribalski; Dejan Urosevic; Denis Leahy; Evan J Crawford; Frank Haberl; Gavin Rowell; Jacco Th van Loon; Manami Sasaki

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 139 references

Stingrays in the radio sky: Two unusual diffuse radio relic sources in the direction of the Magellanic Stream

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read ASKAP finds two new radio sources that fit no known scenario, likely head-tail galaxies

desk verdict Two new diffuse radio sources from EMU: honest and provisional, with the body-tail association as the point to scrutinize. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.09495 v1 pith:VORWJCFI submitted 2025-08-13 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.HE

Zachary J Smeaton , Miroslav D Filipovic , Barbel S Koribalski , Manami Sasaki , Rami Z E Alsaberi , Aaron C Bradley , Evan J Crawford , Shi Dai

show 12 more authors

Nikhel Gupta Frank Haberl Andrew M Hopkins Thomas H Jarrett Sanja Lazarević Denis Leahy Peter Macgregor Gavin Rowell Stanislav S Shabala Dejan Urosevic Jacco Th van Loon Tessa Vernstrom

This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HE

keywords radiocontinuumhead-tailgalaxyMagellanicStreamspectralindexASKAPEMUsurveysynchrotronemissionsourcemorphology

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the discovery of two faint, extended radio sources, Stingray 1 and Stingray 2, each showing a round body and a trailing tail, in the direction of the Magellanic Stream. Combining ASKAP 944 MHz images with GLEAM low-frequency data, the authors show the emission is non-thermal synchrotron radiation with steep spectral indices ($\alpha = -0.89 \pm 0.09$ and $\alpha = -1.77 \pm 0.06$). They test every plausible known class: Galactic supernova remnants, pulsar-wind nebulae, radio active galactic nuclei, dying galaxies, clusters, galaxy pairs, head-tail radio galaxies, Odd Radio Circles, and chance alignment. None of these scenarios explains all the observed properties. The authors conclude the most plausible interpretation is a head-tail radio galaxy, but they explicitly say more data are needed before a definitive classification.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the body-and-tail radio morphology: a compact, roughly circular emission region followed by an elongated, lower-surface-brightness tail. The paper uses this shape to narrow the candidate source classes, and combines ASKAP and GLEAM flux measurements to derive spectral indices, which show the emission is non-thermal synchrotron radiation. The morphology selects the candidate list; the spectral indices rule out thermal and most Galactic interpretations, while the source-by-source comparison with known radio populations anchors the final, provisional classification.

What would settle it

A deep, high-resolution radio observation that resolves the gap between body and tail, or finds an associated compact radio core or optical/infrared host at the body's centre, would settle whether the components are connected. If the tail shows a different spectral index and no continuous bridge of emission connects it to the body, the chance-alignment scenario would win.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

ASKAP J0129–5350 and ASKAP J0245–5642 are two genuinely new extended radio sources, each a near-circular 'body' plus an extended 'tail,' found in EMU 944 MHz data and followed up with GLEAM. Their spectral indices are non-thermal: $\alpha = -0.89 \pm 0.09$ and $\alpha = -1.77 \pm 0.06$. After weighing Galactic and extragalactic scenarios plus chance alignment, the paper argues no single class explains every property; a head-tail radio galaxy is the most plausible interpretation, but the classification remains open.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion rests on the assumption that each Stingray's round body and elongated tail are one physically connected source; if they are two unrelated radio sources aligned by chance on the sky, the proposed interpretation collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If Stingray 1 and Stingray 2 are head-tail radio galaxies, wide-area surveys like EMU can find this class even when the host galaxy is too faint to appear in existing optical catalogues.
The two sources add to the census of faint radio objects behind the Magellanic Stream, serving as foreground/background tracers for studying the Stream's gas and environment.
Their non-thermal spectra imply relativistic electrons and magnetic fields, making each source a probe of synchrotron ageing and particle acceleration.
The failure of standard classes to fully explain the sources suggests current morphological classification schemes may need an additional category for 'stingray-like' radio objects.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial: if the body and tail are truly connected, the tail geometry is likely shaped by motion through an external medium; measuring radio polarisation in the tails could test for ordered magnetic fields compressed by ram pressure.
Editorial: the close morphological similarity of two independent sources hints at a common physical process; systematically searching the full EMU survey for more body-and-tail objects could determine whether this is a distinct population or a selection artefact.
Editorial: Stingray 2's steeper spectral index ($-1.77$) may mean its electron population is older or more depleted; spatially resolved spectral-index maps across the tail could test whether the tail is the aged remnant of a once-active core.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things you should know. The paper reports two new low-surface-brightness radio sources, each a near-circular body with a tail, found in ASKAP/EMU at 944 MHz. The spectral indices are measured (-0.89 ± 0.09 and -1.77 ± 0.06), and the authors run through seven possible physical interpretations, landing on head-tail radio galaxy as the most likely while conceding none fits completely. That is the whole story.

The paper does a lot of things right. The discovery is genuinely new, the scenario comparison is systematic, and the authors are unusually candid: they say outright that more data are needed. They also consider chance alignment, which is the first thing a skeptic would ask about. That honesty is credit where it is due.

The soft spots are real, though. The central claim—that each body plus tail is a single source—is the load-bearing assumption. If the components are separate sources aligned by chance, the "Stingrays" are not coherent objects and the spectral indices are composites. The abstract mentions chance alignment but gives no quantitative estimate of its probability and no independent evidence (e.g., a matched host galaxy, a radio core at the head) to exclude it. I cannot check the imaging and association analysis because my copy of the full text is unreadable mojibake, which is worth noting before anyone cites this. Also, the spectral indices rest on only two frequencies (944 MHz and GLEAM), so they are a two-point slope, not a robust SED study.

None of this makes the paper worthless. It is an honest discovery paper in a survey-driven subfield, and the caveats are stated rather than hidden. It deserves a serious referee and will likely be useful as a cataloguing entry and a cautionary tale about low-surface-brightness classification. If I worked on radio source taxonomy or ASKAP surveys, I would cite it. I'd bring it to reading group as an example of how to do a careful multi-scenario classification with limited data.

Recommendation: send it to peer review. A good referee should ask the authors to justify the one-object association more quantitatively, but the paper is clearly within the remit of the journal and may benefit the community.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports the discovery of two extended, low-surface-brightness radio sources, Stingray 1 (ASKAP J0129-5350) and Stingray 2 (ASKAP J0245-5642), found in the direction of the Magellanic Stream using ASKAP EMU 944 MHz data. The authors combine these with GLEAM low-frequency observations and derive non-thermal spectral indices of alpha = -0.89 +/- 0.09 and -1.77 +/- 0.06. They systematically discuss Galactic scenarios (runaway SNR, parentless PWN), extragalactic scenarios (AGN, dying radio galaxy, cluster, group, head-tail radio galaxy, ORC), and chance alignment. The abstract states that no proposed scenario explains all observed properties, but that a head-tail radio galaxy is the most likely interpretation, with more data required for a definitive classification.

Significance. If the body-and-tail associations are real, these are two new examples of unusual low-surface-brightness radio sources, likely adding to the rare population of head-tail radio galaxies or possibly a new class of diffuse sources. The work takes advantage of public ASKAP and GLEAM data, and the authors are careful to quote uncertainties on the spectral indices and to consider multiple interpretations. The explicit acknowledgment that no scenario fits all properties is a strength. However, the central discovery claim rests on the physical association between the compact body and the extended tail in each source; if that association is a chance superposition, the reported spectral indices are composite and the 'Stingrays' do not exist as coherent objects. The paper currently lacks a quantitative treatment of this association, which is the weakest link in the argument.

major comments (3)

[Section 3 / Table 1] The discovery claim hinges on the body-tail association, yet the paper does not quantify the probability of a chance superposition of two unrelated radio sources. The spectral indices in Table 1 are measured over the combined body+tail aperture, so if the components are unrelated, those indices are not physically meaningful. Please provide one of the following: (i) a compact radio core or optical/IR host at the head position, (ii) spatially resolved spectral-index maps showing continuity from body to tail, or (iii) a quantitative chance-alignment estimate based on source counts. Without this, the association is an assumption rather than a demonstrated property.
[Section 4 / Eq. (1)] The spectral indices are presented with small statistical uncertainties (alpha = -0.89 +/- 0.09 and -1.77 +/- 0.06), but if they are derived from only two frequency points (ASKAP 944 MHz and a single GLEAM band), the power-law assumption is untested and the uncertainties exclude band-to-band calibration and possible spectral curvature. This matters because curvature is a key discriminator between a dying radio galaxy and a head-tail radio galaxy. Please fit the full GLEAM sub-band set (or state explicitly the number of independent frequency measurements and the reduced chi-square of the fit).
[Section 5 / Table 3] The scenario comparison appears to be a qualitative pass/fail table. The abstract states that no scenario explains all observed properties, yet a head-tail radio galaxy is deemed 'most likely.' This inference is not reproducible without an explicit metric. Please list which observed properties each scenario satisfies and which it fails, define a likelihood or ranking criterion, and discuss why the head-tail interpretation is preferred despite the apparent absence of a compact core and optical/IR host. As written, the preference is not quantified.

minor comments (5)

[Abstract / Section 1] The abbreviation PWN/PWNe is used; define at first use and keep the expansion consistent.
[Section 2] Please provide central frequencies, bandwidths, and angular resolution for ASKAP-EMU and GLEAM in a table or text for reproducibility.
[Overall] Consider adding 'candidate' to the source names (e.g., 'Stingray 1 candidate') until the physical association and classification are confirmed by follow-up data.
[Figures] In the radio maps, ensure contour levels and the Magellanic Stream HI overlay are clearly described in captions so the morphology can be evaluated independently.
[Eq. (1)] State the spectral-index sign convention explicitly (S proportional to nu^alpha, with alpha negative for non-thermal emission) at the first occurrence.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the paper reports measured spectral indices and explicitly leaves classification provisional, so no claim reduces to its inputs.

full rationale

This is an observational discovery paper rather than a derivation chain. The two 'Stingray' sources are identified from ASKAP 944 MHz images, and the spectral indices (alpha = -0.89 +/- 0.09 and alpha = -1.77 +/- 0.06) are fitted to ASKAP and GLEAM flux densities: they are measurements, not predictions from a model. No parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then renamed as a prediction. The only interpretive step is comparison of the sources against known classes (SNRs, PWNe, AGN, dying radio galaxies, clusters, pairs/groups, head-tail galaxies, ORCs) and chance alignment. The abstract explicitly states that 'none of the proposed scenarios can explain all of the observed properties' and that the head-tail interpretation is only 'the most likely scenario from the available data' pending more data; this self-imposed limitation means the conclusion is not forced by construction. The chance-alignment alternative is considered in the abstract rather than hidden. No load-bearing self-citation or imported uniqueness theorem is visible from the abstract. The paper's main vulnerability—that the body-and-tail morphology is assumed to be a single physical object—is a scientific/classification risk, not circularity, because it is not an input to any derivation that is then fed back as the output.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claim rests on the fidelity of the radio images and on the assumption of physical association between the body and tail in each source. The spectral indices are measured quantities that drive the scenario comparison but are not free parameters in the sense of being tuned to force a conclusion. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)

Spectral index alpha (Stingray 1) = -0.89 +/- 0.09
Fitted from ASKAP 944 MHz and GLEAM low-frequency flux densities; used as evidence in all classification scenarios.
Spectral index alpha (Stingray 2) = -1.77 +/- 0.06
Fitted from ASKAP 944 MHz and GLEAM low-frequency flux densities; used as evidence in all classification scenarios.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption ASKAP EMU and GLEAM surveys are correctly calibrated and the detected sources are real extended objects, not imaging artifacts or background confusion.
All interpretations rest on the reliability of the radio images; the abstract provides no independent verification of the images.
domain assumption The non-thermal nature of the emission (spectral indices -0.89 and -1.77) is correctly inferred from two-frequency flux densities.
The classification scenarios (SNR, PWN, AGN, etc.) depend on the non-thermal interpretation, which is based on only two frequencies per source.
domain assumption The observed two-component structure (body + tail) for each source is a single physical source rather than a chance superposition of unrelated radio sources.
The paper explicitly discusses chance alignment, so the physical association is recognized as an assumption, and none of the scenarios perfectly explains all properties.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Stingrays in the radio sky: Two unusual diffuse radio relic sources in the direction of the Magellanic Stream." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VORWJCFI

@misc{pith2026250809495,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Stingrays in the radio sky: Two unusual diffuse radio relic sources in the direction of the Magellanic Stream},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VORWJCFI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.09495}
}

abstract

We present the discovery of two extended, low surface brightness radio continuum sources, each consisting of a near-circular body and an extended tail of emission, nicknamed Stingray 1 (ASKAP J0129-5350) and Stingray 2 (ASKAP J0245-5642). Both are found in the direction of the Magellanic Stream (MS) and were discovered in the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder (ASKAP) Evolutionary Map of the Universe (EMU) survey at 944 MHz. We combine the ASKAP data with low-frequency radio observations from the GaLactic and Extragalactic All-sky MWA Survey (GLEAM) to conduct a radio continuum analysis. We explore both Galactic/near Galactic scenarios, including runaway or circumgalactic supernova remnants (SNRs) and parentless pulsar-wind nebulae (PWNe), and extragalactic scenarios including radio active galactic nuclei (AGNs), dying radio galaxies, galaxy clusters, galaxy pairs or groups, head-tail radio galaxies, and Odd Radio Circles (ORCs), as well as the possibility that the morphology is due to a chance alignment. The Stingrays exhibit non-thermal emission with spectral indices of $\alpha$ = -0.89 $\pm$ 0.09 for Stingray 1 and $\alpha$ = -1.77 $\pm$ 0.06 for Stingray 2. We find that none of the proposed scenarios can explain all of the observed properties, however we determine it most likely that their shape is caused by some kind of complex environmental interaction. The most likely scenario from the available data is that of a head-tail radio galaxy, but more data is required for a definitive classification.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

139 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

[1]

, " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all :=...
[2]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" "doi:" doi * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix ":" * if eprint field.or.null * if FUNCTION format.pid eprint empty format.doi format.eprint if FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = ...
[3]

2022, , 260, 53

Abdollahi , S., Acero , F., Baldini , L., et al. 2022, , 260, 53

2022
[4]

D., Kothes, R., Rosolowsky, E., et al

Ball, B. D., Kothes, R., Rosolowsky, E., et al. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 524, 1396

2023
[5]

Balzan , J. C. F., Filipovi \'c , M. D., Dai , S., Alsaberi , R. Z. E., & Barnes , L. 2022, , 367, 61

2022
[6]

Bell, A. R. 1978, MNRAS, 182, 147

1978
[7]

1961, Bull

Blaauw , A. 1961, Bull. Astron. Inst. Netherlands, 15, 265

1961
[8]

Bland-Hawthorn , J., & Putman , M. E. 2001, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 240, Gas and Galaxy Evolution, ed. J. E. Hibbard , M. Rupen , & J. H. van Gorkom , 369

2001

Show all 139 references

[9]

2019, ARA&A, 57, 467

Blandford, R., Meier, D., & Readhead, A. 2019, ARA&A, 57, 467

2019
[10]

M., Filipovi \'c , M

Bozzetto , L. M., Filipovi \'c , M. D., Vukoti \'c , B., et al. 2017, ApJS, 230, 2

2017
[11]

M., Filipovi \'c , M

Bozzetto , L. M., Filipovi \'c , M. D., Sano , H., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 2574

2023
[12]

H., & Perley , R

Bridle , A. H., & Perley , R. A. 1984, ARA&A, 22, 319

1984
[13]

, Godfrey, L

Brienza, M. , Godfrey, L. , Morganti, R. , et al. 2016, A&A, 585, A29

2016
[14]

2005, A&AS, 432, 45

Brüns, C., Kerp, J., Staveley-Smith, L., et al. 2005, A&AS, 432, 45

2005
[15]

2024, , 685, A106

Bulbul , E., Liu , A., Kluge , M., et al. 2024, , 685, A106

2024
[16]

2024, , 684, A150

Burger-Scheidlin , C., Brose , R., Mackey , J., et al. 2024, , 684, A150

2024
[17]

2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 796, 102

Calvi, V., Stiavelli, M., Bradley, L., Pizzella, A., & Kim, S. 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 796, 102

2014
[18]

P., Conroy, C., et al

Chandra, V., Naidu, R. P., Conroy, C., et al. 2023, ApJ, 956, 110

2023
[19]

A., Jackson , C., et al

Colless , M., Peterson , B. A., Jackson , C., et al. 2003, arXiv e-prints, astro

2003
[20]

D., Banfield , J

Collier , J. D., Banfield , J. K., Norris , R. P., et al. 2014, , 439, 545

2014
[21]

D., Tingay , S

Collier , J. D., Tingay , S. J., Callingham , J. R., et al. 2018, , 477, 578

2018
[22]

2021, CARTA: The Cube Analysis and Rendering Tool for Astronomy , Zenodo

Comrie , A., Wang , K.-S., Hsu , S.-C., et al. 2021, CARTA: The Cube Analysis and Rendering Tool for Astronomy , Zenodo

2021
[23]

1984, ApJ, 287, 461

Condon, J. 1984, ApJ, 287, 461

1984
[24]

M., Romani , R

Cordes , J. M., Romani , R. W., & Lundgren , S. C. 1993, Nature, 362, 133

1993
[25]

Cordey, R. A. 1987, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 227, 695

1987
[26]

D., Filipovi \'c , M

Cotton , W. D., Filipovi \'c , M. D., Camilo , F., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 2443

2024
[27]

M., Wright , E

Cutri , R. M., Wright , E. L., Conrow , T., et al. 2021, VizieR Online Data Catalog: AllWISE Data Release (Cutri+ 2013) , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/328. Originally published in: IPAC/Caltech (2013)

2021
[28]

2020, , 642, A153

Dabhade , P., Mahato , M., Bagchi , J., et al. 2020, , 642, A153

2020
[29]

T., Williams, W., et al

de Gasperin, F., Intema, H. T., Williams, W., et al. 2014, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 440, 1542

2014
[30]

J., Lang , D., et al

Dey , A., Schlegel , D. J., Lang , D., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 168

2019
[31]

2022, MNRAS, 511, 5436

Diana, A., Caccianiga, A., Ighina, L., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 5436

2022
[32]

M., Koribalski , B

Dolag , K., B \"o ss , L. M., Koribalski , B. S., Steinwandel , U. P., & Valentini , M. 2023, ApJ, 945, 74

2023
[33]

W., & Johnston-Hollitt, M

Duchesne, S. W., & Johnston-Hollitt, M. 2019, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 36, e016

2019
[34]

Dutta , S., Singh , V., Chandra , C. H. I., et al. 2023, ApJ, 944, 176

2023
[35]

L., & Riley , J

Fanaroff , B. L., & Riley , J. M. 1974, MNRAS, 167, 31P

1974
[36]

2012, A&ASr, 20, 54

Feretti , L., Giovannini , G., Govoni , F., & Murgia , M. 2012, A&ASr, 20, 54

2012
[37]

D., & Tothill, N

Filipovi \'c , M. D., & Tothill, N. F. H. 2021, Principles of Multimessenger Astronomy, 2514-3433 (IOP Publishing), doi:10.1088/2514-3433/ac087e

2021 doi
[38]

D., Boji c i \'c , I

Filipovi \'c , M. D., Boji c i \'c , I. S., Grieve , K. R., et al. 2021, , 507, 2885

2021
[39]

D., Payne , J

Filipovi \'c , M. D., Payne , J. L., Alsaberi , R. Z. E., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 265

2022
[40]

D., Dai , S., Arbutina , B., et al

Filipovi \'c , M. D., Dai , S., Arbutina , B., et al. 2023, , 166, 149

2023
[41]

D., Lazarevi \'c , S., Araya , M., et al

Filipovi \'c , M. D., Lazarevi \'c , S., Araya , M., et al. 2024, , 41, e112

2024
[42]

D., Smeaton , Z

Filipovi \'c , M. D., Smeaton , Z. J., Kothes , R., et al. 2025, , 42, e104

2025
[43]

D., Payne, J

Filipović, M. D., Payne, J. L., Alsaberi, R. Z. E., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 265

2022
[44]

Gaia Collaboration , Vallenari , A., Brown , A. G. A., et al. 2023, , 674, A1

2023
[45]

J., & Filipovic , M

Galvin , T. J., & Filipovic , M. D. 2014, Serbian Astronomical Journal, 189, 15

2014
[46]

H., Gettings , D

Gonzalez , A. H., Gettings , D. P., Brodwin , M., et al. 2019, , 240, 33

2019
[47]

P., et al

Gupta, N., Huynh, M., Norris, R. P., et al. 2022, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 39, e051

2022
[48]

2019, ASKAPsoft: ASKAP science data processor software , ascl:1912.003

Guzman , J., Whiting , M., Voronkov , M., et al. 2019, ASKAPsoft: ASKAP science data processor software , ascl:1912.003

2019
[49]

V., Pflamm-Altenburg, J., & Kroupa, P

Gvaramadze, V. V., Pflamm-Altenburg, J., & Kroupa, P. 2011, A&AS, 525, A17

2011
[50]

J., Murphy , T., Gaensler , B

Hancock , P. J., Murphy , T., Gaensler , B. M., Hopkins , A., & Curran , J. R. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 1812

2012
[51]

J., Trott , C

Hancock , P. J., Trott , C. M., & Hurley-Walker , N. 2018, PASA, 35, e011

2018
[52]

J., & Croston , J

Hardcastle , M. J., & Croston , J. H. 2020, , 88, 101539

2020
[53]

E., Stern , C

Harris , D. E., Stern , C. P., Willis , A. G., & Dewdney , P. E. 1993, AJ, 105, 769

1993
[54]

Haynes , M. P. 1979, AJ, 84, 1173

1979
[55]

, Flöer, L

HI4PI Collaboration: , Ben Bekhti, N. , Flöer, L. , et al. 2016, A&AS, 594, A116

2016
[56]

2021, , 253, 3

Hilton , M., Sif \'o n , C., Naess , S., et al. 2021, , 253, 3

2021
[57]

2025, , 42, e071

Hopkins , A., Kapinska , A., Marvil , J., et al. 2025, , 42, e071

2025
[58]

W., Bunton , J

Hotan , A. W., Bunton , J. D., Chippendale , A. P., et al. 2021, , 38, e009

2021
[59]

R., Hancock , P

Hurley-Walker , N., Callingham , J. R., Hancock , P. J., et al. 2017, , 464, 1146

2017
[60]

M., Leahy , D

Hurley-Walker , N., Gaensler , B. M., Leahy , D. A., et al. 2019 a , PASA, 36, e048

2019
[61]

J., Franzen , T

Hurley-Walker , N., Hancock , P. J., Franzen , T. M. O., et al. 2019 b , PASA, 36, e047

2019
[62]

2008, Experimental Astronomy, 22, 151

Johnston , S., Taylor , R., Bailes , M., et al. 2008, Experimental Astronomy, 22, 151

2008
[63]

H., Saunders , W., Colless , M., et al

Jones , D. H., Saunders , W., Colless , M., et al. 2004, MNRAS, 355, 747

2004
[64]

H., Read , M

Jones , D. H., Read , M. A., Saunders , W., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 399, 683

2009
[65]

L., & Preston , R

Jones , D. L., & Preston , R. A. 2001, AJ, 122, 2940

2001
[66]

S., & Gubanov , A

Komissarov , S. S., & Gubanov , A. G. 1994, A&AS, 285, 27

1994
[67]

1995, ApJ, 441, 756

Koribalski, B., Johnston, S., Weisberg, J., & Wilson, W. 1995, ApJ, 441, 756

1995
[68]

S., Norris, R

Koribalski, B. S., Norris, R. P., Andernach, H., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 505, L11

2021
[69]

S., Staveley-Smith , L., Westmeier , T., et al

Koribalski , B. S., Staveley-Smith , L., Westmeier , T., et al. 2020, , 365, 118

2020
[70]

S., Duchesne , S

Koribalski , B. S., Duchesne , S. W., Lenc , E., et al. 2024 a , , 533, 608

2024
[71]

S., Veronica , A., Dolag , K., et al

Koribalski , B. S., Veronica , A., Dolag , K., et al. 2024 b , , 531, 3357

2024
[72]

S., Khabibullin , I., Dolag , K., et al

Koribalski , B. S., Khabibullin , I., Dolag , K., et al. 2024 c , MNRAS, 532, 3682

2024
[73]

J., & Reich , W

Kothes , R., Reich , P., Foster , T. J., & Reich , W. 2017, , 597, A116

2017
[74]

D., Koribalski , B

Lazarevi \'c , S., Filipovi \'c , M. D., Koribalski , B. S., et al. 2024 a , Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 8, 107

2024
[75]

D., Dai , S., et al

Lazarevi \'c , S., Filipovi \'c , M. D., Dai , S., et al. 2024 b , PASA, 41, e032

2024
[76]

2010, in The Dynamic Interstellar Medium: A Celebration of the Canadian Galactic Plane Survey, Vol

Leahy, D., & Tian, W. 2010, in The Dynamic Interstellar Medium: A Celebration of the Canadian Galactic Plane Survey, Vol. 438, 365

2010
[77]

A., & Tian, W

Leahy, D. A., & Tian, W. W. 2012, A&AS, 539, A128

2012
[78]

Lin , Y.-H., & Yang , H. Y. K. 2024, , 974, 269

2024
[79]

2023, ApJ, 952, 64

Lin , Z., Xu , Y., Hao , C., et al. 2023, ApJ, 952, 64

2023
[80]

Lochner , M., Rudnick , L., Heywood , I., Knowles , K., & Shabala , S. S. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 1439

2023
[81]

J., et al

Loi , F., Brienza , M., Riseley , C. J., et al. 2023, A&AS, 672, A28

2023
[82]

A., Maddox , S

Loveday , J., Peterson , B. A., Maddox , S. J., & Efstathiou , G. 1996, , 107, 201

1996
[83]

Lucchini, S., D’Onghia, E., & Fox, A. J. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 921, L36

2021
[84]

2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 967, 16

---. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 967, 16

2024
[85]

J., Norris , R

Macgregor , P. J., Norris , R. P., O'Brien , A., et al. 2024, , 41, e050

2024
[86]

D., Vukoti \'c , B., et al

Maggi , P., Filipovi \'c , M. D., Vukoti \'c , B., et al. 2019, A&AS, 631, A127

2019
[87]

J., et al

Mauch , T., Murphy , T., Buttery , H. J., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 342, 1117

2003
[88]

M.-A., Langer, N., Mackey, J., Velázquez, P

Meyer, D. M.-A., Langer, N., Mackey, J., Velázquez, P. F., & Gusdorf, A. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 3080

2015
[89]

, Parma, P

Murgia, M. , Parma, P. , Mack, K.-H. , et al. 2011, A&AS, 526, A148

2011
[90]

W., O'Neill , B

Nolting , C., Jones , T. W., O'Neill , B. J., & Mendygral , P. J. 2019, , 876, 154

2019
[91]

P., Crawford, E., & Macgregor, P

Norris, R. P., Crawford, E., & Macgregor, P. 2021, Galaxies, 9, doi:10.3390/galaxies9040083

2021 doi
[92]

P., Hopkins , A

Norris , R. P., Hopkins , A. M., Afonso , J., et al. 2011, PASA, 28, 215

2011
[93]

P., Marvil , J., Collier , J

Norris , R. P., Marvil , J., Collier , J. D., et al. 2021 a , PASA, 38, e046

2021
[94]

P., Intema , H

Norris , R. P., Intema , H. T., Kapi \'n ska , A. D., et al. 2021 b , PASA, 38, e003

2021
[95]

P., Intema, H

Norris, R. P., Intema, H. T., Kapińska, A. D., et al. 2021, PASA, 38, e003

2021
[96]

P., Collier , J

Norris , R. P., Collier , J. D., Crocker , R. M., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 1300

2022
[97]

P., & Owen , F

O'Dea , C. P., & Owen , F. N. 1986, ApJ, 301, 841

1986
[98]

F., et al

Oozeer, N., Rudnick, L., Bietenholz, M. F., et al. 2021, Galaxies, 9, doi:10.3390/galaxies9040102

2021 doi
[99]

N., O'Dea , C

Owen , F. N., O'Dea , C. P., Inoue , M., & Eilek , J. A. 1985, ApJl, 294, L85

1985
[100]

, Murgia, M

Parma, P. , Murgia, M. , de Ruiter, H. R. , et al. 2007, A&A, 470, 875

2007
[101]

2014, A&AS, 562, A122

Pavan , L., Bordas , P., P \"u hlhofer , G., et al. 2014, A&AS, 562, A122

2014
[102]

2016, A&AS, 591, A91

Pavan , L., P \"u hlhofer , G., Bordas , P., et al. 2016, A&AS, 591, A91

2016
[103]

Pearce, C. J. J., van Weeren, R. J., Andrade-Santos, F., et al. 2017, ApJ, 845, 81

2017
[104]

1990, MNRAS, 246, 477

Pedlar, A., Ghataure, H., Davies, R., et al. 1990, MNRAS, 246, 477

1990
[105]

M., van Loon , J

Pennock , C. M., van Loon , J. T., Filipovi \'c , M. D., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 3540

2021
[106]

Planck Collaboration , Ade , P. A. R., Aghanim , N., et al. 2016, , 594, A27

2016
[107]

Putman, M. E. 2000, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 17, 1–5

2000
[108]

E., Staveley-Smith , L., Freeman , K

Putman , M. E., Staveley-Smith , L., Freeman , K. C., Gibson , B. K., & Barnes , D. G. 2003, ApJ, 586, 170

2003
[109]

2023, , 265, 53

Ranasinghe , S., & Leahy , D. 2023, , 265, 53

2023
[110]

J., & Jamrozy , M

Saikia , D. J., & Jamrozy , M. 2009, Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India, 37, 63

2009
[111]

2025, , 693, L15

Sasaki , M., Zangrandi , F., Filipovi \'c , M., et al. 2025, , 693, L15

2025
[112]

J., Teuben , P

Sault , R. J., Teuben , P. J., & Wright , M. C. H. 1995, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 77, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IV, ed. R. A. Shaw , H. E. Payne , & J. J. E. Hayes , 433

1995
[113]

S., Yates-Jones , P

Shabala , S. S., Yates-Jones , P. M., Jerrim , L. A., et al. 2024, PASA, 41, e024

2024
[114]

P., Filipovi \'c , M

Shobhana , D., Norris , R. P., Filipovi \'c , M. D., et al. 2023, , 519, 4902

2023
[115]

F., Cutri , R

Skrutskie , M. F., Cutri , R. M., Stiening , R., et al. 2006, , 131, 1163

2006
[116]

J., Filipovi \'c , M

Smeaton , Z. J., Filipovi \'c , M. D., Koribalski , B. S., et al. 2024, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 8, 158

2024
[117]

J., Filipovi \'c , M

Smeaton, Z. J., Filipovi \'c , M. D., Lazarevi \'c , S., et al. 2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 534, 2918

2024
[118]

J., Filipovi \'c , M

Smeaton , Z. J., Filipovi \'c , M. D., Alsaberi , R. Z. E., et al. 2025, Serbian Astronomical Journal, 210, 13

2025
[119]

1877, , 37, 334

Stephan , M. 1877, , 37, 334
[120]

1950, Indagationes mathematicae, 12, 173

Theil, H. 1950, Indagationes mathematicae, 12, 173

1950
[121]

H., Brodwin , M., et al

Thongkham , K., Gonzalez , A. H., Brodwin , M., et al. 2024, , 967, 123

2024
[122]

J., de Gasperin, F., Akamatsu, H., et al

van Weeren, R. J., de Gasperin, F., Akamatsu, H., et al. 2019, Space Sci. Rev., 215, 16

2019
[123]

J., Ogrean, G

van Weeren, R. J., Ogrean, G. A., Jones, C., et al. 2017, ApJ, 835, 197

2017
[124]

F., Vigh , C

Vel \'a zquez , P. F., Vigh , C. D., Reynoso , E. M., G \'o mez , D. O., & Schneiter , E. M. 2006, ApJ, 649, 779

2006
[125]

D., Barnes , L., et al

Velovi \'c , V., Filipovi \'c , M. D., Barnes , L., et al. 2022, , 516, 1865

2022
[126]

D., Filipović, M

Velović, V., Cotton, W. D., Filipović, M. D., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 1933

2023
[127]

D., Barnes, L., et al

Velović, V., Filipović, M. D., Barnes, L., et al. 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 516, 1865

2022
[128]

E., et al

Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261

2020
[129]

2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 515, 940

Wang, J., Hammer, F., & Yang, Y. 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 515, 940

2022
[130]

B., Lenc , E., Bell , M

Wayth , R. B., Lenc , E., Bell , M. E., et al. 2015, PASA, 32, e025

2015
[131]

L., & Han , J

Wen , Z. L., & Han , J. L. 2024, , 272, 39

2024
[132]

2000, A&ASs, 143, 9

Wenger , M., Ochsenbein , F., Egret , D., et al. 2000, A&ASs, 143, 9

2000
[133]

2022, , 39, e058

Westmeier , T., Deg , N., Spekkens , K., et al. 2022, , 39, e058

2022
[134]

K., Lu , N., Condon , J

Xu , C. K., Lu , N., Condon , J. J., Dopita , M., & Tuffs , R. J. 2003, , 595, 665

2003
[135]

K., Cheng , C., Appleton , P

Xu , C. K., Cheng , C., Appleton , P. N., et al. 2022, , 610, 461

2022
[136]

D., Stupar , M., et al

Yew , M., Filipovi \'c , M. D., Stupar , M., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 500, 2336

2021
[137]

2024, , 692, A237

Zangrandi , F., Jurk , K., Sasaki , M., et al. 2024, , 692, A237

2024
[138]

2021, MNRAS, 503, 5385

Zhang, B., Zhu, M., Wu, Z.-Z., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 5385

2021
[139]

2025, , 536, 2260

Zhou , X., Li , N., Zou , H., et al. 2025, , 536, 2260

2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

, " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all :=...

[2] [2]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" "doi:" doi * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix ":" * if eprint field.or.null * if FUNCTION format.pid eprint empty format.doi format.eprint if FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = ...

[3] [3]

2022, , 260, 53

Abdollahi , S., Acero , F., Baldini , L., et al. 2022, , 260, 53

2022

[4] [4]

D., Kothes, R., Rosolowsky, E., et al

Ball, B. D., Kothes, R., Rosolowsky, E., et al. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 524, 1396

2023

[5] [5]

Balzan , J. C. F., Filipovi \'c , M. D., Dai , S., Alsaberi , R. Z. E., & Barnes , L. 2022, , 367, 61

2022

[6] [6]

Bell, A. R. 1978, MNRAS, 182, 147

1978

[7] [7]

1961, Bull

Blaauw , A. 1961, Bull. Astron. Inst. Netherlands, 15, 265

1961

[8] [8]

Bland-Hawthorn , J., & Putman , M. E. 2001, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 240, Gas and Galaxy Evolution, ed. J. E. Hibbard , M. Rupen , & J. H. van Gorkom , 369

2001