Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 104 references

Mapping feedback signatures in 3C 297: A quasar-host merger at Cosmic Noon

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In quasar host 3C 297, the radio jet's expanding cocoon is proposed as the dominant feedback, driving an 18-kpc outflow and triggering star formation.

desk verdict First IFU map of 3C 297 reveals an 18 kpc ionized outflow and co-spatial star formation, but the jet-triggering story needs age constraints that aren't in the text. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.11926 v1 pith:5Z3UMVUJ submitted 2025-08-16 astro-ph.GA

Chetna Duggal , Christopher P. O'Dea , Stefi A. Baum , John Jiwa , Grant Tremblay , Marco Chiaberge , George Miley , Carlo Stanghellini
show 1 more author
William Sparks
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords AGNfeedbackradiojetsjet-inducedstarformationionizedgasoutflowsquasarhostgalaxiesintegral-fieldspectroscopy3C297cosmicnoon
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish what actually drives feedback in 3C 297, a radio-loud quasar host caught in a merger at the peak epoch of galaxy and black-hole growth. New integral-field spectroscopy reveals a blueshifted Hα wing that traces ionized gas flowing out to about 18 kpc, while archival HST/UV and VLA images show blue star-forming clumps aligned with the radio hotspots. The authors conclude that the expanding jet cocoon shocked the interstellar medium, launching the kpc-scale outflow and triggering new starbursts, with radiation pressure from accretion only a possible secondary contributor. If this reading is right, 3C 297 is a resolved case where one mechanical feedback channel simultaneously pushes gas out and makes stars in a merging host.

What carries the argument

The expanding jet cocoon—the hot, overpressurized bubble of shocked radio plasma and swept-up interstellar gas—is the mechanism proposed to do the work. It shocks the ISM, driving the ionized outflow seen as a blueshifted wing in Hα, and compresses gas into the young star clusters identified as blue excess. The argument is carried by aligning the SINFONI narrow-Hα map with archived HST/UV and VLA images to compare the spatial distribution of star-forming clumps, ionized gas motion, and radio hotspots.

What would settle it

Measure the stellar ages of the blue clumps from their spectral energy distributions and the radio source age from spectral ageing; if the clumps predate the jet, the causal chain from cocoon shock to starburst fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that in the quasar host 3C 297, at cosmic noon, the dominant AGN feedback is mechanical rather than radiative: the expanding radio jet cocoon shocks the interstellar medium, drives an ionized gas outflow extending roughly 18 kpc, and compresses gas into new starbursts, with radiation pressure from accretion playing at most a supporting role. This conclusion comes from combining new VLT/SINFONI integral-field observations of Hα+[NII] emission, especially a prominent blueshifted Hα wing, with archival HST/UV and VLA images. The blue excess marking young stars is clumpy and spatially coincides with the radio hotspots, and the narrow-Hα map lets the authors locate st

Load-bearing premise

The central claim rests on the timing assumption that the blue star-forming clumps are the same age as or younger than the radio jet, so their alignment with the hotspots records jet-triggered star formation rather than a pre-existing merger pattern.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Radio jet mechanical energy, not just radiation pressure, must be included as a primary feedback channel in quasar-host models at cosmic noon.
  • Ionized outflows in such systems can extend to roughly 18 kpc, beyond the main stellar body, so jet feedback can directly affect the circumgalactic medium.
  • Jet-induced starbursts will appear as blue UV clumps spatially tied to radio hotspots, a signature that could be searched for in other bent-jet quasars.
  • Merger-driven star formation and jet-triggered star formation can coexist in one host, so feedback in merging quasars has both a disruptive and a productive side.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test of the proposed causal ordering is to measure the stellar ages of the blue clumps and compare them with the radio source's spectral age; if the stars are older than the jet, the jet-triggering interpretation would be weakened.
  • The bent-jet morphology itself may serve as a signpost for jet-ISM interaction; surveying other bending jets with integral-field spectroscopy could reveal whether cocoon-driven feedback is common in such systems.
  • The 18-kpc blueshifted feature may include merger tidal motion; a detailed velocity decomposition would clarify how much of the gas is truly outflowing versus part of the disturbed kinematics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper presents VLT/SINFONI integral-field spectroscopy of the quasar host galaxy 3C 297 at cosmic noon, combined with archival HST/UV and VLA imaging. The authors report a prominent blue-shifted Hα wing interpreted as an ionized gas outflow extending ~18 kpc from the nucleus, and clumpy blue excess emission co-spatial with the radio hotspots, which they map as a young stellar population. They argue that the powerful radio source dominates AGN feedback, with a possible contribution from radiation pressure, and that the expanding jet cocoon shocked the ISM, triggering both a kpc-scale ionized gas outflow and new starbursts that enhance ongoing merger-induced star formation. The reviewable text (abstract, first two introduction paragraphs, references) contains no data analysis sections, so the quantitative and modeling steps underlying these claims cannot be checked.

Significance. If the causal interpretation is correct, 3C 297 would be a rare resolved case at cosmic noon where a single mechanism—the expanding jet cocoon—simultaneously drives a kpc-scale ionized outflow and triggers star formation inside a merging host, with the jet dominating over radiation pressure as the feedback channel. Such a result would be of considerable interest for AGN feedback studies and for understanding the interplay between radio jets, ISM, and star formation at z~1-3. The paper draws on a valuable combination of new SINFONI IFU data and archival multi-wavelength imaging, and the interpretation is falsifiable with the presented data. However, the strength of the claim rests entirely on the causal ordering between the radio source, the young stellar population, and the outflow, which the available text does not establish.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract (feedback causality)] The central claim that the expanding jet cocoon 'triggered a kpc-scale ionized gas outflow and new starbursts' requires that the young stellar population traced by the blue/UV excess is coeval with or younger than the radio source. The reviewable text provides no stellar population ages (e.g., from SED fitting to HST/UV photometry) and no radio spectral age or hotspot advance speed. Co-spatiality between blue clumps and radio hotspots is consistent with, but does not establish, jet-triggered star formation; the clumps could be pre-existing merger-induced starbursts or even scattered AGN light. This is a load-bearing gap in the causality argument as presented.
  2. [Abstract (outflow identification)] The identification of the blue-shifted Hα wing as a jet-driven ionized gas outflow extending to ~18 kpc rests on a single kinematic feature. The text does not report whether alternative interpretations (rotating disk component, tidal debris, a second kinematic component) were tested, nor provide line-profile fitting details, velocity offsets, or the spatial extent of the wing. Since the outflow is the second pillar of the feedback story, its identification must be justified with the kinematic data and modeling in the full paper.
  3. [Entire manuscript as provided] The reviewable text contains only the abstract, the first two paragraphs of the introduction, and references. No data reduction, PSF subtraction, AGN contribution removal, extinction correction, or star formation rate derivation is available to check the quantitative claims (e.g., ~18 kpc extent, co-spatiality of blue excess with hotspots, 'new starbursts'). If these sections are missing from the submitted manuscript, the paper is incomplete; if they are present in the full version, the abstract and introduction must summarize the relevant modeling and uncertainty analysis to support the causal interpretation. As submitted, the central claim is not verifiable.
minor comments (3)
  1. [References] The umlaut in 'Förster Schreiber' is rendered as 'F¨ orster' in several places (e.g., Introduction and references), an encoding artifact that should be corrected.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract does not state the redshift of 3C 297 or the adopted cosmology, making the physical scale (~18 kpc, ~30 kpc arc) hard to evaluate without external lookup. Adding z and cosmology would improve clarity.
  3. [Introduction] The introduction would benefit from a concise statement of what is new relative to Duggal et al. (2024, ApJ, 965, 17), which already presented the HST morphology and blue excess. This would help the reader assess the incremental contribution of the SINFONI data.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the feedback interpretation is an empirical synthesis of independent HST, SINFONI, and VLA datasets; no fitted quantity is relabeled as a prediction, and the one self-citation (Duggal et al. 2024) is contextual rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

The reviewable text contains no equation-based derivation chain, no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, and no self-citation invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as the justification for a central premise. The abstract and introduction report independent observations: archival HST morphology (bright ~30 kpc arc, filamentary line-emitting gas, clumpy blue excess), new VLT/SINFONI Hα+[NII] integral-field kinematics (a prominent blue-shifted wing extending to ~18 kpc), and VLA radio structure (bent jets, hotspots). The paper's main claim—that the expanding jet cocoon shocked the ISM, triggering a kpc-scale ionized gas outflow and new starbursts—is explicitly presented as an interpretation rather than a derivation ('we suggest', 'we also propose', 'likely shocked'), grounded in spatial coincidence between the blue excess and radio hotspots plus the observed outflow kinematics. Spatial coincidence plus kinematics may be weak causal evidence, and the claim would be stronger with stellar population ages and radio source ages, but that is an evidentiary or scientific-argument concern, not circularity. The only self-citation visible in the provided text, Duggal et al. (2024, ApJ 965, 17), supplies the earlier HST context; the new SINFONI data are independent of it, and no load-bearing step reduces to that citation. No circular step satisfying the quoted-evidence standard exists in the supplied manuscript.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are visible in the available text; the central claim depends on standard astrophysical calibrations (H-alpha to star formation rate, dust extinction) and on the interpretive assumptions listed. The most fragile element is the timing assumption that the starburst is contemporaneous with or younger than the jet, which is needed for the jet-triggering causality claim and is not demonstrated in the abstract or introduction. Review was limited to the abstract, the first two paragraphs of the introduction, and the reference list.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The blue-shifted wing in H-alpha traces a spatially extended outflow of ionized gas rather than an unresolved nuclear component or a second kinematic system (e.g., merger debris).
    Abstract: 'A prominent blue-shifted wing in Hα indicates an ionized gas flow extending out to ~18 kpc.' This assumes the line decomposition and the kinematic mapping are correct; central to the outflow claim.
  • domain assumption The HST/UV blue excess, after AGN subtraction, maps the young stellar population.
    Abstract: 'Combining our SINFONI narrow-Hα data with archival HST/UV ... we map the young stellar population.' Requires that dust, AGN scattered light, and line contamination do not dominate the UV continuum.
  • domain assumption Spatial coincidence of star-forming regions with radio hotspots supports jet-triggered star formation.
    Abstract: '...triggering a kpc-scale ionized gas outflow and new starbursts.' Requires a timing ordering (starburst contemporaneous with or younger than the jet) that is not demonstrated in the available text; the merger alone could produce both the clumpy star formation and the jet bending.
  • domain assumption Bent-jet morphology indicates the jet is interacting with a dense ISM (and/or precessing).
    Abstract: 'powerful bent-jet radio source suggesting vigorous interaction with a dense ISM and/or jet precession.' The feedback interpretation depends on this geometric reading of the VLA map.
  • domain assumption Standard H-alpha luminosity to star formation rate calibration and standard flux/extinction corrections are valid at this redshift.
    The young stellar population map is derived from narrow-H-alpha and HST/UV fluxes; standard Kennicutt-type calibrations and dust corrections are imported, not derived. Applies in the (unavailable) analysis section.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Mapping feedback signatures in 3C 297: A quasar-host merger at Cosmic Noon." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5Z3UMVUJ

@misc{pith2026250811926,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Mapping feedback signatures in 3C 297: A quasar-host merger at Cosmic Noon},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5Z3UMVUJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.11926}
}
read the original abstract

We present a study of quasar host galaxy 3C 297 which is home to a powerful bent-jet radio source suggesting vigorous interaction with a dense ISM and/or jet precession. Archival HST imaging showed interestingly perturbed morphology of the host with a bright ~30 kpc arc feature, extended filamentary structure of line-emitting gas and clumpy blue excess emission co-spatial with the radio hotspots. Our VLT/SINFONI integral-field observations reveal complex, spatially-resolved H{\alpha}+[NII] emission in this source. A prominent blue-shifted wing in H{\alpha} indicates an ionized gas flow extending out to ~18 kpc from the nuclear region. Combining our SINFONI narrow-H{\alpha} data with archival HST/UV and VLA imaging, we map the young stellar population in the host and compare the spatial distribution of star-forming regions with the ionized gas motion and jet structure. In the attempt to characterize the feedback mechanisms in this chaotic system, we suggest that the powerful radio source dominates the feedback with possible contribution from radiation pressure due to AGN accretion. We also propose that the expanding jet cocoon likely shocked the ISM, triggering a kpc-scale ionized gas outflow and new starbursts that enhanced ongoing merger-induced star formation.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    G., Groves , B

    Allen , M. G., Groves , B. A., Dopita , M. A., Sutherland , R. S., & Kewley , L. J. 2008, , 178, 20, 10.1086/589652

    doi:10.1086/589652 2008

  2. [2]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, , 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  3. [3]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f 2018

  4. [4]

    M., Lim , P

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Lim , P. L., et al. 2022, , 935, 167, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 2022

  5. [5]

    A., Phillips , M

    Baldwin , J. A., Phillips , M. M., & Terlevich , R. 1981, , 93, 5, 10.1086/130766

    doi:10.1086/130766 1981

  6. [6]

    D., & Miley , G

    Barthel , P. D., & Miley , G. K. 1988, , 333, 319, 10.1038/333319a0

    work page doi:10.1038/333319a0 1988

  7. [7]

    D., Miley , G

    Barthel , P. D., Miley , G. K., Schilizzi , R. T., & Lonsdale , C. J. 1988, , 73, 515

    1988

  8. [8]

    C., & Cioffi , D

    Begelman , M. C., & Cioffi , D. F. 1989, , 345, L21, 10.1086/185542

    doi:10.1086/185542 1989

Show all 104 references
  1. [10]

    S., et al

    Borodina , O., Ni , Y., Bennett , J. S., et al. 2025, , 981, 149, 10.3847/1538-4357/adb016

    2025 doi

  2. [11]

    A., & Yang , H.-Y

    Bourne , M. A., & Yang , H.-Y. K. 2023, Galaxies, 11, 73, 10.3390/galaxies11030073

    2023 doi

  3. [12]

    J., & Terlevich , R

    Boyle , B. J., & Terlevich , R. J. 1998, , 293, L49, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01264.x

    1998

  4. [13]

    2024, , 963, 91, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad19db

    Breiding , P., Chiaberge , M., Lambrides , E., et al. 2024, , 963, 91, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad19db

    2024 doi

  5. [14]

    2012, , 537, L8, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118358

    Cano-D \' az , M., Maiolino , R., Marconi , A., et al. 2012, , 537, L8, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118358

    2012 doi

  6. [15]

    2022, , 657, A114, 10.1051/0004-6361/202141965

    Capetti , A., Balmaverde , B., Tadhunter , C., et al. 2022, , 657, A114, 10.1051/0004-6361/202141965

    2022 doi

  7. [16]

    2015, , 580, A102, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526557

    Carniani , S., Marconi , A., Maiolino , R., et al. 2015, , 580, A102, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526557

    2015 doi

  8. [17]

    W., McNamara , B

    Cavagnolo , K. W., McNamara , B. R., Nulsen , P. E. J., et al. 2010, , 720, 1066, 10.1088/0004-637X/720/2/1066

    2010 doi

  9. [18]

    M., & Norman , C

    Chiaberge , M., Gilli , R., Lotz , J. M., & Norman , C. 2015, , 806, 147, 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/147

    2015 doi

  10. [19]

    2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 176, 10.1038/s41550-018-0406-3

    Cicone , C., Brusa , M., Ramos Almeida , C., et al. 2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 176, 10.1038/s41550-018-0406-3

    2018 doi

  11. [20]

    2011, , 413, 1687, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18244.x

    Cid Fernandes , R., Stasi \'n ska , G., Mateus , A., & Vale Asari , N. 2011, , 413, 1687, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18244.x

    2011

  12. [21]

    2006, , 453, L29, 10.1051/0004-6361:20065155

    Cimatti , A., Daddi , E., & Renzini , A. 2006, , 453, L29, 10.1051/0004-6361:20065155

    2006 doi

  13. [22]

    2020, , 497, 5229, 10.1093/mnras/staa2321

    Costa , T., Pakmor , R., & Springel , V. 2020, , 497, 5229, 10.1093/mnras/staa2321

    2020 doi

  14. [23]

    Costa , T., Rosdahl , J., Sijacki , D., & Haehnelt , M. G. 2018, , 473, 4197, 10.1093/mnras/stx2598

    2018 doi

  15. [24]

    Costa , T., Sijacki , D., & Haehnelt , M. G. 2014, , 444, 2355, 10.1093/mnras/stu1632

    2014 doi

  16. [25]

    2015, , 799, 82, 10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/82

    Cresci , G., Mainieri , V., Brusa , M., et al. 2015, , 799, 82, 10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/82

    2015 doi

  17. [26]

    2023, , 672, A128, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346001

    Cresci , G., Tozzi , G., Perna , M., et al. 2023, , 672, A128, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346001

    2023 doi

  18. [27]

    J., Crain , R

    Davies , J. J., Crain , R. A., Oppenheimer , B. D., & Schaye , J. 2020, , 491, 4462, 10.1093/mnras/stz3201

    2020 doi

  19. [28]

    Doj c inovi \'c , I., Kova c evi \'c -Doj c inovi \'c , J., & Popovi \'c , L. C . 2023, Advances in Space Research, 71, 1219, 10.1016/j.asr.2022.04.041

    2023 doi

  20. [29]

    2014, , 796, 113, 10.1088/0004-637X/796/2/113

    Dugan , Z., Bryan , S., Gaibler , V., Silk , J., & Haas , M. 2014, , 796, 113, 10.1088/0004-637X/796/2/113

    2014 doi

  21. [30]

    P., Baum , S

    Duggal , C., O'Dea , C. P., Baum , S. A., et al. 2024, , 965, 17, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2513

    2024 doi

  22. [31]

    2020, , 636, A73, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936817

    Duras , F., Bongiorno , A., Ricci , F., et al. 2020, , 636, A73, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936817

    2020 doi

  23. [32]

    L., & Riley , J

    Fanaroff , B. L., & Riley , J. M. 1974, , 167, 31P, 10.1093/mnras/167.1.31P

    1974 doi

  24. [33]

    2017, , 601, A143, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629478

    Fiore , F., Feruglio , C., Shankar , F., et al. 2017, , 601, A143, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629478

    2017 doi

  25. [34]

    M., & Wuyts , S

    F \"o rster Schreiber , N. M., & Wuyts , S. 2020, , 58, 661, 10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021910

    2020 doi

  26. [35]

    M., Genzel , R., Bouch \'e , N., et al

    F \"o rster Schreiber , N. M., Genzel , R., Bouch \'e , N., et al. 2009, , 706, 1364, 10.1088/0004-637X/706/2/1364

    2009 doi

  27. [36]

    M., Renzini , A., Mancini , C., et al

    F \"o rster Schreiber , N. M., Renzini , A., Mancini , C., et al. 2018, , 238, 21, 10.3847/1538-4365/aadd49

    2018 doi

  28. [37]

    2012, , 425, 438, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21479.x

    Gaibler , V., Khochfar , S., Krause , M., & Silk , J. 2012, , 425, 438, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21479.x

    2012

  29. [38]

    A., et al

    Glikman , E., Langgin , R., Johnstone , M. A., et al. 2023, , 951, L18, 10.3847/2041-8213/acda2f

    2023 doi

  30. [39]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    2020 doi

  31. [40]

    M., Costa , T., Tadhunter , C

    Harrison , C. M., Costa , T., Tadhunter , C. N., et al. 2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 198, 10.1038/s41550-018-0403-6

    2018 doi

  32. [41]

    M., & Ramos Almeida , C

    Harrison , C. M., & Ramos Almeida , C. 2024, Galaxies, 12, 17, 10.3390/galaxies12020017

    2024 doi

  33. [42]

    P., et al

    Hilbert , B., Chiaberge , M., Kotyla , J. P., et al. 2016, , 225, 12, 10.3847/0067-0049/225/1/12

    2016 doi

  34. [43]

    R., & Tadhunter , C

    Holden , L. R., & Tadhunter , C. N. 2023, , 524, 886, 10.1093/mnras/stad1677

    2023 doi

  35. [44]

    F., & Elvis , M

    Hopkins , P. F., & Elvis , M. 2010, , 401, 7, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15643.x

    2010

  36. [45]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90, 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    2007 doi

  37. [46]

    N., Jahnke , K., et al

    Husemann , B., Bennert , V. N., Jahnke , K., et al. 2019, , 879, 75, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab24bc

    2019 doi

  38. [47]

    C., & Maiolino , R

    Ishibashi , W., Fabian , A. C., & Maiolino , R. 2018, , 476, 512, 10.1093/mnras/sty236

    2018 doi

  39. [48]

    1997, , 286, 241, 10.1093/mnras/286.1.241

    Jackson , N., & Rawlings , S. 1997, , 286, 241, 10.1093/mnras/286.1.241

    1997 doi

  40. [49]

    E., Harrison , C

    Jarvis , M. E., Harrison , C. M., Mainieri , V., et al. 2021, , 503, 1780, 10.1093/mnras/stab549

    2021 doi

  41. [50]

    M., Broderick , J

    Johnston , H. M., Broderick , J. W., Cotter , G., Morganti , R., & Hunstead , R. W. 2010, , 407, 721, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16950.x

    2010

  42. [51]

    A., & Mandel , E

    Joye , W. A., & Mandel , E. 2003, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 295, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XII, ed. H. E. Payne , R. I. Jedrzejewski , & R. N. Hook , 489

    2003

  43. [52]

    2018, , 618, A6, 10.1051/0004-6361/201832790

    Kakkad , D., Groves , B., Dopita , M., et al. 2018, , 618, A6, 10.1051/0004-6361/201832790

    2018 doi

  44. [53]

    2020, , 642, A147, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038551

    Kakkad , D., Mainieri , V., Vietri , G., et al. 2020, , 642, A147, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038551

    2020 doi

  45. [54]

    2000, , 311, 576, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03077.x

    Kauffmann , G., & Haehnelt , M. 2000, , 311, 576, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03077.x

    2000

  46. [55]

    2005, , 635, L121, 10.1086/499430

    King , A. 2005, , 635, L121, 10.1086/499430

    2005 doi

  47. [56]

    2015, , 53, 115, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122316

    King , A., & Pounds , K. 2015, , 53, 115, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122316

    2015 doi

  48. [57]

    R., & Pounds , K

    King , A. R., & Pounds , K. A. 2003, , 345, 657, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06980.x

    2003

  49. [58]

    Kormendy , J., & Ho , L. C. 2013, , 51, 511, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101811

    2013 doi

  50. [59]

    Krause , M. G. H., Shabala , S. S., Hardcastle , M. J., et al. 2019, , 482, 240, 10.1093/mnras/sty2558

    2019 doi

  51. [60]

    2014, , 52, 415, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615

    Madau , P., & Dickinson , M. 2014, , 52, 415, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615

    2014 doi

  52. [61]

    2024, , 531, 2079, 10.1093/mnras/stae1295

    Mandal , A., Mukherjee , D., Federrath , C., et al. 2024, , 531, 2079, 10.1093/mnras/stae1295

    2024 doi

  53. [62]

    Martini , P., & Weinberg , D. H. 2001, , 547, 12, 10.1086/318331

    2001 doi

  54. [63]

    Y., et al

    Meenakshi , M., Mukherjee , D., Wagner , A. Y., et al. 2022 a , , 511, 1622, 10.1093/mnras/stac167

    2022 doi

  55. [64]

    2022 b , , 516, 766, 10.1093/mnras/stac2251

    ---. 2022 b , , 516, 766, 10.1093/mnras/stac2251

    2022 doi

  56. [65]

    P., Schirmer , M., et al

    Missaglia , V., Madrid , J. P., Schirmer , M., et al. 2023, , 264, 6, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac9f3e

    2023 doi

  57. [66]

    J., et al

    Molina , M., Eracleous , M., Barth , A. J., et al. 2018, , 864, 90, 10.3847/1538-4357/aad5ed

    2018 doi

  58. [67]

    2013, Science, 341, 1082, 10.1126/science.1240436

    Morganti , R., Fogasy , J., Paragi , Z., Oosterloo , T., & Orienti , M. 2013, Science, 341, 1082, 10.1126/science.1240436

    2013 doi

  59. [68]

    A., Tadhunter , C

    Morganti , R., Oosterloo , T. A., Tadhunter , C. N., et al. 2004, , 424, 119, 10.1051/0004-6361:20041064

    2004 doi

  60. [69]

    A., Raymond , J

    Morse , J. A., Raymond , J. C., & Wilson , A. S. 1996, , 108, 426, 10.1086/133744

    1996 doi

  61. [70]

    2002, , 383, 46, 10.1051/0004-6361:20011727

    Moy , E., & Rocca-Volmerange , B. 2002, , 383, 46, 10.1051/0004-6361:20011727

    2002 doi

  62. [71]

    V., Sutherland , R., & Wagner , A

    Mukherjee , D., Bicknell , G. V., Sutherland , R., & Wagner , A. 2016, , 461, 967, 10.1093/mnras/stw1368

    2016 doi

  63. [72]

    V., Wagner , A

    Mukherjee , D., Bicknell , G. V., Wagner , A. Y., Sutherland , R. S., & Silk , J. 2018, , 479, 5544, 10.1093/mnras/sty1776

    2018 doi

  64. [73]

    R., Prichard , L

    Mulcahey , C. R., Prichard , L. J., Krajnovi \'c , D., & Jorgenson , R. A. 2021, , 504, 5087, 10.1093/mnras/stab1137

    2021 doi

  65. [74]

    E., & Ferland , G

    Osterbrock , D. E., & Ferland , G. J. 2006, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

    2006

  66. [75]

    2012, QFitsView: FITS file viewer , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1210.019

    Ott , T. 2012, QFitsView: FITS file viewer , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1210.019

    2012

  67. [76]

    Perez , F., & Granger , B. E. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 21, 10.1109/MCSE.2007.53

    2007 doi

  68. [77]

    2016, , 462, 4183, 10.1093/mnras/stw1946

    Podigachoski , P., Rocca-Volmerange , B., Barthel , P., Drouart , G., & Fioc , M. 2016, , 462, 4183, 10.1093/mnras/stw1946

    2016 doi

  69. [78]

    D., Haas , M., et al

    Podigachoski , P., Barthel , P. D., Haas , M., et al. 2015, , 575, A80, 10.1051/0004-6361/201425137

    2015 doi

  70. [79]

    2018, , 865, 5, 10.3847/1538-4357/aad9f8

    Rakshit , S., & Woo , J.-H. 2018, , 865, 5, 10.3847/1538-4357/aad9f8

    2018 doi

  71. [80]

    Rees , M. J. 1989, , 239, 1P, 10.1093/mnras/239.1.1P

    1989 doi

  72. [81]

    M., Rafelski , M., et al

    Revalski , M., Crenshaw , D. M., Rafelski , M., et al. 2022, , 930, 14, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5f3d

    2022 doi

  73. [82]

    L., Strauss , M

    Reyes , R., Zakamska , N. L., Strauss , M. A., et al. 2008, , 136, 2373, 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2373

    2008 doi

  74. [83]

    2020, reproject: Python-based astronomical image reprojection , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2011.023

    Robitaille , T., Deil , C., & Ginsburg , A. 2020, reproject: Python-based astronomical image reprojection , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2011.023

    2020

  75. [84]

    M., et al

    Ruby , M., M \"u ller-S \'a nchez , F., Comerford , J. M., et al. 2024, , 535, 763, 10.1093/mnras/stae2320

    2024 doi

  76. [85]

    Santoro , F., Oonk , J. B. R., Morganti , R., & Oosterloo , T. 2015, , 574, A89, 10.1051/0004-6361/201425103

    2015 doi

  77. [86]

    F., Faucher-Gigu \`e re , C.-A., et al

    Shen , X., Hopkins , P. F., Faucher-Gigu \`e re , C.-A., et al. 2020, , 495, 3252, 10.1093/mnras/staa1381

    2020 doi

  78. [87]

    Silk , J., & Rees , M. J. 1998, , 331, L1, 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9801013

    1998 doi arXiv

  79. [88]

    1985, , 97, 932, 10.1086/131647

    Spinrad , H., Djorgovski , S., Marr , J., & Aguilar , L. 1985, , 97, 932, 10.1086/131647

    1985 doi

  80. [89]

    2025, , 695, A179, 10.1051/0004-6361/202451334

    Stanghellini , C., Orienti , M., Spingola , C., et al. 2025, , 695, A179, 10.1051/0004-6361/202451334

    2025 doi

  81. [90]

    2013, MAPPINGS III: Modelling And Prediction in PhotoIonized Nebulae and Gasdynamical Shocks , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1306.008

    Sutherland , R., Dopita , M., Binette , L., & Groves , B. 2013, MAPPINGS III: Modelling And Prediction in PhotoIonized Nebulae and Gasdynamical Shocks , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1306.008

    2013

  82. [91]

    S., & Bicknell , G

    Sutherland , R. S., & Bicknell , G. V. 2007, , 173, 37, 10.1086/520640

    2007 doi

  83. [92]

    D., McNamara , B

    Tamhane , P. D., McNamara , B. R., Russell , H. R., et al. 2023, , 519, 3338, 10.1093/mnras/stac3803

    2023 doi

  84. [93]

    M., & Simmons , B

    Treister , E., Schawinski , K., Urry , C. M., & Simmons , B. D. 2012, , 758, L39, 10.1088/2041-8205/758/2/L39

    2012 doi

  85. [94]

    2015, , 446, 2985, 10.1093/mnras/stu2213

    van Velzen , S., Falcke , H., & K \"o rding , E. 2015, , 446, 2985, 10.1093/mnras/stu2213

    2015 doi

  86. [95]

    L., Ishikawa , Y., et al

    Vayner , A., Zakamska , N. L., Ishikawa , Y., et al. 2024, , 960, 126, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0be9

    2024 doi

  87. [96]

    2005, , 43, 769, 10.1146/annurev.astro.43.072103.150610

    Veilleux , S., Cecil , G., & Bland-Hawthorn , J. 2005, , 43, 769, 10.1146/annurev.astro.43.072103.150610

    2005 arXiv

  88. [97]

    Veilleux , S., & Osterbrock , D. E. 1987, , 63, 295, 10.1086/191166

    1987 doi

  89. [98]

    2023, , 953, 56, 10.3847/1538-4357/ace10f

    Veilleux , S., Liu , W., Vayner , A., et al. 2023, , 953, 56, 10.3847/1538-4357/ace10f

    2023 doi

  90. [99]

    2023, , 678, A127, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347375

    Venturi , G., Treister , E., Finlez , C., et al. 2023, , 678, A127, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347375

    2023 doi

  91. [100]

    Y., & Bicknell , G

    Wagner , A. Y., & Bicknell , G. V. 2011, , 728, 29, 10.1088/0004-637X/728/1/29

    2011 doi

  92. [101]

    2024, , 683, A169, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348531

    Wang , W., Wylezalek , D., De Breuck , C., et al. 2024, , 683, A169, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348531

    2024 doi

  93. [102]

    J., & Hooda , J

    Wang , Z., Wiita , P. J., & Hooda , J. S. 2000, , 534, 201, 10.1086/308743

    2000 doi

  94. [103]

    2016, , 817, 108, 10.3847/0004-637X/817/2/108

    Woo , J.-H., Bae , H.-J., Son , D., & Karouzos , M. 2016, , 817, 108, 10.3847/0004-637X/817/2/108

    2016 doi

  95. [104]

    Wright , E. L. 2006, , 118, 1711, 10.1086/510102

    2006 doi

  96. [105]

    2012, , 745, L34, 10.1088/2041-8205/745/2/L34

    Zubovas , K., & King , A. 2012, , 745, L34, 10.1088/2041-8205/745/2/L34

    2012 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.