Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Carry the Tail in Consensus Protocols

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read The submission claims a new consensus protocol, Carry-the-Tail, that defeats tail-forking attacks with linear steady-state communication, but the supplied manuscript contains none of the protocol's specification or proofs.

desk verdict The submission is two different papers: an abstract about a consensus protocol and a full text about robotics energy efficiency; the consensus claims have zero support in the manuscript. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.12173 v1 pith:PEIA6TW6 submitted 2025-08-16 cs.DB

classification cs.DB
keywords atomicbroadcastconsensusprotocolspartialsynchronytail-forkingattacksHotStufffamilycommunicationcomplexityByzantinefaults
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The submission sets out to prove that a mechanism named Carry-the-Tail can be inserted into HotStuff-family consensus protocols to neutralize tail-forking attacks: after the network reaches global stabilization time, non-faulty leaders would keep committing a constant fraction of proposals, with optimal quadratic worst-case communication and linear amortized traffic, and without the SNARK-based machinery of earlier defenses. That would matter because current atomic-broadcast protocols either suffer throughput collapse under tail-forking or pay quadratic communication steps or expensive zero-knowledge proofs to resist it. The manuscript as supplied does not support this aim: its full text is an unrelated systematic literature review about energy-efficient robotics software, and it never mentions, specifies, or proves the Carry mechanism. A sympathetic reader can see the intended contribution in the abstract, but the presented text provides no derivational content for it.

What carries the argument

Carry is the named mechanism: described in the abstract as a practical, drop-in addition to streamlined protocols in the HotStuff family, meant to protect honest leaders' commits against tail-forking and to remove most leader-induced stalls. It is the load-bearing object of the claimed result—retrofitting it should yield the constant-fraction commit guarantee and the linear/quadratic communication bounds. No description of how Carry achieves this appears in the supplied text; the mechanism is named and claimed, not defined or analyzed.

What would settle it

Search the supplied full text for the terms 'Carry', 'tail-forking', or 'atomic broadcast': none occur; the body is a robotics-energy literature review. That absence is decisive for the submission as given. For the underlying claim, the decisive check would be a simulation under partial synchrony where an adversary tail-forks honest leaders after GST: if the honest-leader commit fraction fails to stay constant, or if a cascade of faulty leaders drives communication beyond quadratic, the claimed guarantees fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its face, the paper claims to introduce Carry-the-Tail, the first deterministic atomic broadcast protocol for partial synchrony that, after a global stabilization time (GST), guarantees a constant fraction of commits by non-faulty leaders even under tail-forking attacks, while keeping worst-case communication quadratic under cascades of faulty leaders and linear in steady state. The payoff would be a drop-in defense for HotStuff-family protocols that avoids the quadratic communication steps or prohibitive SNARK generation of prior fixes. The supplied full text, however, is not this protocol: it is a systematic literature review on energy efficiency in robotics software, and it contains no

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the submission actually contains the Carry-the-Tail protocol—its precise rule, pseudocode, and proofs—so the abstract's guarantees can be checked; the supplied text contains none of this, so as presented the central claim has nothing to rest on.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • HotStuff-family implementations could adopt Carry without changing their quorum structure or steady-state message pattern, keeping amortized communication linear.
  • Tail-forking resistance would become available without SNARKs, removing a computationally prohibitive component from existing defenses.
  • A cascade of faulty leaders would cost at most quadratic communication, so the protocol remains within the optimal worst-case bound while sustaining commits.
  • After GST, any stretch of non-faulty leaders would contribute a constant fraction of committed proposals, bounding the throughput damage a tail-forking adversary can inflict.
  • Because Carry is presented as drop-in, the defense would generalize across streamlined protocols rather than requiring a new consensus core.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A reader should treat the abstract's numbers as unverified: the supplied body is a different study, so there is no evidence in this submission that the constant-fraction or communication guarantees hold.
  • If a full specification of Carry is provided later, the natural experiment is to run HotStuff-family implementations under a tail-forking adversary and measure honest-leader commit fraction and message complexity before and after GST; the paper supplies no such data.
  • The drop-in framing suggests that, if realized, the mechanism could also be adapted to other streamlined BFT protocols built on rotating leaders and chained certificates; this extension is not argued in the abstract.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The arXiv submission (2508.12173) is presented as a computer science systems paper titled 'Carry the Tail in Consensus Protocols'. The abstract claims a deterministic atomic broadcast protocol for partial-synchrony systems that, after GST, guarantees a constant fraction of commits by non-faulty leaders against tail-forking attacks, maintains optimal worst-case quadratic communication under cascades of faulty leaders, and provides linear amortized communication as a drop-in mechanism for HotStuff-family protocols. The full text, however, is an unrelated systematic literature review titled 'Energy Efficiency in Robotics Software: A Systematic Literature Review (2020-2024)' by Aryan Gupta. The body contains no protocol specification, no pseudocode, no model definitions, no theorems, no proofs, no complexity analysis, and no evaluation of any consensus protocol. The terms 'consensus', 'atomic broadcast', 'HotStuff', 'tail-forking', 'Byzantine', and 'GST' do not appear in the full text. The manuscript therefore does not support its abstract claims at all.

Significance. If the abstract claims were true, the work would be a meaningful contribution to Byzantine fault-tolerant consensus: a protocol that mitigates tail-forking attacks while preserving linear steady-state communication and quadratic worst-case complexity would improve on known trade-offs that require SNARKs or quadratic communication steps. However, because the manuscript body is a different paper on robotics software energy efficiency, the substantive consensus claims cannot be evaluated. The robotics SLR itself appears methodologically careful, with a documented LLM-assisted pipeline, human audits, and a replication package, but it is out of scope for this submission's title and abstract and provides no evidence for the consensus claims. The 'first' claim in the abstract is unverifiable from the submitted text.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / Full Text] The abstract promises a deterministic atomic broadcast protocol called Carry-the-Tail, with specific guarantees against tail-forking attacks, but the full text is a systematic literature review on energy efficiency in robotics software. No protocol, algorithm, or mechanism named 'Carry' is defined anywhere in the body. The central claim therefore has zero derivational support in the submitted manuscript.
  2. [Abstract] The core guarantees—'constant fraction of commits by non-faulty leaders', 'optimal worst-case quadratic communication', and 'linear amortized communication'—are asserted without any formal model of partial synchrony, GST, adversary structure, leader election, quorum intersection, or complexity measure. The full text contains no equations, theorems, or proofs relevant to these guarantees. This is a load-bearing omission: the paper cannot be reviewed as a technical consensus paper in its current form.
  3. [Entire manuscript] The claim that Carry-the-Tail is 'the first' deterministic atomic broadcast protocol with these properties cannot be checked because the manuscript contains no related-work discussion of consensus protocols. The reference list [1]–[95] covers only robotics energy efficiency, and the body never mentions prior atomic broadcast solutions, tail-forking attacks, or SNARK-based approaches. The novelty assertion is therefore unverifiable.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Metadata vs. full text] The full-text author (Aryan Gupta) and title differ from the arXiv metadata for this submission. If this is a file-upload error, the correct manuscript should be provided; otherwise the submission is internally inconsistent.
  2. [Section 4.5] The limitations listed in the robotics SLR apply to that review and are irrelevant to the consensus-protocol claims. This further confirms that the body and abstract describe different works.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the provided full text is an unrelated robotics SLR, so the abstract's consensus-protocol claims have no derivation chain to audit.

full rationale

The claimed derivation chain for Carry-the-Tail (deterministic atomic broadcast, constant post-GST commit fraction, quadratic worst-case communication, linear amortized communication) is entirely absent from the provided manuscript body. The full text is 'Energy Efficiency in Robotics Software: A Systematic Literature Review (2020-2024)' by Aryan Gupta; it contains no equations, no protocol pseudocode, no partial-synchrony/GST model, no quorum rules, and no proofs related to consensus, HotStuff, tail-forking, or atomic broadcast. Circularity requires exhibiting a specific reduction of a claimed result to its own inputs, fitted parameters, or self-citations. No such reduction exists here because the supporting derivation does not exist in the submission. The abstract/body mismatch is a serious manuscript-integrity and completeness problem, and it makes the central claim unverifiable as submitted, but it is not a form of circularity. There are no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, no load-bearing self-citations, and no construction in which an output equals an input. Accordingly, the honest finding is no significant circularity, with a score of 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The abstract's central claim rests entirely on axioms it does not state and on a body that is not present. The provided full text supplies none of the protocol's model assumptions, lemmas, or named prior-work comparisons. Because the body is an unrelated robotics SLR, the ledger for the claimed consensus result is essentially empty: no derivation exists to audit for free parameters, axioms, or entities. The entries below record the few premises that can be identified from the abstract, plus the structural premise that fails.

assumptions (2)
  • ad hoc to paper The manuscript body corresponds to the paper described by the title and abstract
    The central claim is unreadable without a protocol specification and proof; the provided body is a different paper on robotics software energy efficiency by a different author, so the premise is false.
  • domain assumption Partial-synchrony model with a global stabilization time (GST) and an adversary controlling a cascade of faulty leaders
    Invoked in the abstract ('after GST', 'cascade of faulty leaders') but never defined or defended in the provided text.
invented entities (1)
  • Carry (tail-carrying mechanism)
    purpose: Drop-in mechanism for HotStuff-family protocols that commits a constant fraction of non-faulty leaders' proposals under tail-forking attacks while retaining linear traffic and quadratic worst-case communication
    Introduced only in the abstract; no pseudocode, proof, implementation, or falsifiable experimental handle appears in the full text, so there is no independent evidence.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Carry the Tail in Consensus Protocols." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PEIA6TW6

@misc{pith2026250812173,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Carry the Tail in Consensus Protocols},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PEIA6TW6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.12173}
}
read the original abstract

We present Carry-the-Tail, the first deterministic atomic broadcast protocol in partial synchrony that, after GST, guarantees a constant fraction of commits by non-faulty leaders against tail-forking attacks, and maintains optimal, worst-case quadratic communication under a cascade of faulty leaders. The solution also guarantees linear amortized communication, i.e., the steady-state is linear. Prior atomic broadcast solutions achieve quadratic word communication complexity in the worst case. However, they face a significant degradation in throughput under tail-forking attack. Existing solutions to tail-forking attacks require either quadratic communication steps or computationally-prohibitive SNARK generation. The key technical contribution is Carry, a practical drop-in mechanism for streamlined protocols in the HotStuff family. Carry guarantees good performance against tail-forking and removes most leader-induced stalls, while retaining linear traffic and protocol simplicity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Censorship Resistance and Throughput with Multiple Concurrent Proposers

    cs.GT 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Under a bribery model, multiple concurrent proposers raise the cost of censoring a transaction roughly linearly with the number of proposers, and a fee rule that penalizes duplicated inclusion dominates on both censor...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Architectural Tactics for Energy -Aware Robotics Software: A Preliminary Study

    Chinnappan, Katerina, et al. “Architectural Tactics for Energy -Aware Robotics Software: A Preliminary Study.” Software Architecture, 2021, pp. 164–71. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86044-8_11

  2. [95]

    Three-Tiered Controller for Obstacle Avoidance in a PV Panel-Powered Wheeled Mobile Robot: Considering Actuators and Power Electronics Stages

    Reyes-Reyes, Erik, et al. “Three-Tiered Controller for Obstacle Avoidance in a PV Panel-Powered Wheeled Mobile Robot: Considering Actuators and Power Electronics Stages.” IEEE Access, vol. 12, 2024, pp. 192958 –78. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3515852

  3. [2]

    Energy Efficiency in Robotics Software

    Swanborn, Stan, and Ivano Malavolta. “Energy Efficiency in Robotics Software.” Proceedings of the 35th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering Workshops, Sept. 2020, pp. 144 –51. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1145/3417113.3422997

  4. [3]

    Adaptive UAV Swarm Mission Planning by Temporal Difference Learning

    Gopalakrishnan, Shreevanth Krishnaa, et al. “Adaptive UAV Swarm Mission Planning by Temporal Difference Learning.” 2021 IEEE/AIAA 40th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), Oct. 2021, pp. 1 –10. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1109/dasc52595.2021.9594300

  5. [4]

    <i>A Neuro-Inspired Theory of Joint Human-Swarm Interaction</i>

    Hasbach, Jonas D., and Maren Bennewitz. <i>A Neuro-Inspired Theory of Joint Human-Swarm Interaction</i>. 1, arXiv, 2020, doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2007.04882

  6. [5]

    On the Pragmatic Design of Literature Studies in Software Engineering: An Experience-Based Guideline

    Kuhrmann, Marco, et al. “On the Pragmatic Design of Literature Studies in Software Engineering: An Experience-Based Guideline.” Empirical Software Engineering, vol. 22, no. 6, Jan. 2017, pp. 2852 –91. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-016-9492-y

  7. [6]

    A Systematic Review of Systematic Review Process Research in Software Engineering

    Kitchenham, Barbara, and Pearl Brereton. “A Systematic Review of Systematic Review Process Research in Software Engineering.” Information and Software Technology, vol. 55, no. 12, Dec. 2013, pp. 2049 –75. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2013.07.010

  8. [7]

    Large Language Models in Systematic Review Screening: Opportunities, Challenges, and Methodological Considerations

    Galli, Carlo, et al. “Large Language Models in Systematic Review Screening: Opportunities, Challenges, and Methodological Considerations.” Information, vol. 16, no. 5, May 2025, p. 378. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.3390/info16050378

Show all 95 references
  1. [8]

    Automated Paper Screening for Clinical Reviews Using Large Language Models: Data Analysis Study

    Guo, Eddie, et al. “Automated Paper Screening for Clinical Reviews Using Large Language Models: Data Analysis Study.” Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 26, Jan. 2024, p. e48996. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.2196/48996

  2. [9]

    Empowering Doctoral Students: The Role of Publish or Perish Software in Enhancing Systematic Reviews in Science Education

    Callanga, Collenn, et al. “Empowering Doctoral Students: The Role of Publish or Perish Software in Enhancing Systematic Reviews in Science Education.” Internet Reference Services Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 4, July 2024, pp. 439–52. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2024.2384021

  3. [10]

    Software, 2025

    GROBID. Software, 2025. Project website

  4. [11]

    Evaluating the Reliability of a Custom GPT in Full-Text Screening of a Systematic Review

    Davis, Rachel C., et al. Evaluating the Reliability of a Custom GPT in Full-Text Screening of a Systematic Review. Feb. 2025. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.04.25321655

  5. [12]

    Khraisha, Qusai, et al. “Can Large Language Models Replace Humans in the Systematic Review Process? Evaluating GPT-4's Efficacy in Screening and Extracting Data from Peer-Reviewed and Grey Literature in Multiple Languages.” <i>ArXiv</i>, 2, arXiv, 2023, doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2310.17526

  6. [13]

    Automatic Evidence Retrieval for Systematic Reviews

    Choong, Miew Keen, et al. “Automatic Evidence Retrieval for Systematic Reviews.” Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 16, no. 10, Oct. 2014, p. e223. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3369

  7. [14]

    <i>OpenAlex: A Fully-Open Index of Scholarly Works, Authors, Venues, Institutions, and Concepts</i>

    Priem, Jason, et al. <i>OpenAlex: A Fully-Open Index of Scholarly Works, Authors, Venues, Institutions, and Concepts</i>. 2, arXiv, 2022, doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2205.01833

  8. [15]

    Toward Reliable Ad-Hoc Scientific Information Extraction: A Case Study on Two Materials Dataset

    Ghosh, Satanu, et al. “Toward Reliable Ad-Hoc Scientific Information Extraction: A Case Study on Two Materials Dataset.” Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024, 2024, pp. 15109 –23. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.897

  9. [16]

    Extracting Accurate Materials Data from Research Papers with Conversational Language Models and Prompt Engineering

    Polak, Maciej P., and Dane Morgan. “Extracting Accurate Materials Data from Research Papers with Conversational Language Models and Prompt Engineering.” Nature Communications, vol. 15, no. 1, Feb. 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45914-8

  10. [17]

    An Experimental Energy Consumption Comparison between Trajectories Generated by Using the Cart-Table Model and an Optimization Approach for the Bioloid Robot

    Tacué, Jeison, et al. “An Experimental Energy Consumption Comparison between Trajectories Generated by Using the Cart-Table Model and an Optimization Approach for the Bioloid Robot.” International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, vol. 17, no. 2, Mar. 2020, p. 1729881420917...

  11. [18]

    G., Granada, R., Jurak, D., Magnaguagno, M., Meneguzzi, F., & Amory, A

    Maidana, R. G., Granada, R., Jurak, D., Magnaguagno, M., Meneguzzi, F., & Amory, A. (2020). Energy -Aware Path Planning for Autonomous Mobile Robot Navigation. International FLAIRS Conference, 362 –367

  12. [19]

    Energy Comparison of Controllers Used for a Differential Drive Wheeled Mobile Robot

    Stefek, Alexandr, et al. “Energy Comparison of Controllers Used for a Differential Drive Wheeled Mobile Robot.” IEEE Access, vol. 8, 2020, pp. 170915–27. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3023345

  13. [20]

    Least-Energy Path Planning With Building Accurate Power Consumption Model of Rotary Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

    Hong, Dooyoung, et al. “Least-Energy Path Planning With Building Accurate Power Consumption Model of Rotary Unmanned Aerial Vehicle.” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 69, no. 12, Dec. 2020, pp. 14803–17. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1109/tvt.2020.3040537

  14. [21]

    Mathematical Methods for Planning Energy -Efficient Motion Path of the Manipulator Anthropomorphic Robot for the Typical Obstacles

    Petrenko, V. I., et al. “Mathematical Methods for Planning Energy -Efficient Motion Path of the Manipulator Anthropomorphic Robot for the Typical Obstacles.” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 919, no. 5, Sept. 2020, p. 052055. Crossref, https://doi...

  15. [22]

    Minimizing the Energy Consumption for a Hexapod Robot Based on Optimal Force Distribution

    Wang, Guanyu, et al. “Minimizing the Energy Consumption for a Hexapod Robot Based on Optimal Force Distribution.” IEEE Access, vol. 8, 2020, pp. 5393–406. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2962527

  16. [23]

    Multi-Robot Energy-Efficient Coverage Control with Hopfield Networks

    TURANLI, Mert, and Hakan TEMELTAS. “Multi-Robot Energy-Efficient Coverage Control with Hopfield Networks.” Studies in Informatics and Control, vol. 29, no. 2, July 2020, pp. 179 –88. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.24846/v29i2y202004

  17. [24]

    Reinforcement Learning-Based Energy-Aware Area Coverage for Reconfigurable HRombo Tiling Robot

    Le, Anh Vu, et al. “Reinforcement Learning-Based Energy-Aware Area Coverage for Reconfigurable HRombo Tiling Robot.” IEEE Access, vol. 8, 2020, pp. 209750–61. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3038905

  18. [25]

    Adaptive Floor Cleaning Strategy by Human Density Surveillance Mapping with a Reconfigurable Multi-Purpose Service Robot

    Sivanantham, Vinu, et al. “Adaptive Floor Cleaning Strategy by Human Density Surveillance Mapping with a Reconfigurable Multi-Purpose Service Robot.” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 9, Apr. 2021, p. 2965. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.3390/s21092965

  19. [26]

    An Efficient Transmission Algorithm for Power Grid Data Suitable for Autonomous Multi-Robot Systems

    Chen, Xiaoyan, et al. “An Efficient Transmission Algorithm for Power Grid Data Suitable for Autonomous Multi-Robot Systems.” Information Sciences, vol. 572, Sept. 2021, pp. 543 –57. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.05.033

  20. [27]

    An Energy-Efficient Communication Scheme for Multi-Robot Coordination Deployed for Search and Rescue Operations

    Rajesh, M., and S. R. Nagaraja. “An Energy-Efficient Communication Scheme for Multi-Robot Coordination Deployed for Search and Rescue Operations.” Communication and Intelligent Systems, 2021, pp. 187 –99. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1089-9_16

  21. [28]

    Applied Energy Optimization of Multi-Robot Systems through Motion Parameter Tuning

    Hovgard, Mattias, et al. “Applied Energy Optimization of Multi-Robot Systems through Motion Parameter Tuning.” CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, vol. 35, Nov. 2021, pp. 422 –30. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2021.07.012

  22. [29]

    Battery Charge Dispatching in Multi-Robot Systems

    Xing, Zichao, et al. “Battery Charge Dispatching in Multi-Robot Systems.” 2021 IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control (ICNSC), Dec. 2021, pp. 1 –6. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1109/icnsc52481.2021.9702226

  23. [30]

    Coverage Path Planning Using Reinforcement Learning -Based TSP for HTetran—A Polyabolo-Inspired Self-Reconfigurable Tiling Robot

    Le, Anh Vu, et al. “Coverage Path Planning Using Reinforcement Learning -Based TSP for HTetran—A Polyabolo-Inspired Self-Reconfigurable Tiling Robot.” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 8, Apr. 2021, p. 2577. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.3390/s21082577

  24. [31]

    Energy-Conscientious Trajectory Planning for an Autonomous Mobile Robot in an Asymmetric Task Space

    Bakshi, Soovadeep, et al. “Energy-Conscientious Trajectory Planning for an Autonomous Mobile Robot in an Asymmetric Task Space.” Journal of Intelligent &amp; Robotic Systems, vol. 101, no. 1, Dec. 2020. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-020-01288-9

  25. [32]

    Energy Consumption of Control Schemes for the Pioneer 3DX Mobile Robot: Models and Evaluation

    Jaiem, Lotfi, et al. “Energy Consumption of Control Schemes for the Pioneer 3DX Mobile Robot: Models and Evaluation.” Journal of Intelligent &amp; Robotic Systems, vol. 102, no. 1, Apr. 2021. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-021-01374-6

  26. [33]

    Energy-Efficient Mobile Robot Control via Run-Time Monitoring of Environmental Complexity and Computing Workload

    Mohamed, Sherif A. S., et al. “Energy-Efficient Mobile Robot Control via Run-Time Monitoring of Environmental Complexity and Computing Workload.” 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Sept. 2021, pp. 7587–93. Crossref, https://doi.org...

  27. [34]

    Finite-Horizon Kinetic Energy Optimization of a Redundant Space Manipulator

    Tringali, Alessandro, and Silvio Cocuzza. “Finite-Horizon Kinetic Energy Optimization of a Redundant Space Manipulator.” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 5, Mar. 2021, p. 2346. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052346

  28. [35]

    Optimal Trajectory Planning for Wheeled Mobile Robots under Localization Uncertainty and Energy Efficiency Constraints

    Zhang, Xiaolong, et al. “Optimal Trajectory Planning for Wheeled Mobile Robots under Localization Uncertainty and Energy Efficiency Constraints.” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 2, Jan. 2021, p. 335. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.3390/s21020335

  29. [36]

    Optimization of Energy Consumption for Hexapod Robot Following Inclined Path Using Nontraditional Gait

    Beaber, Sameh, et al. “Optimization of Energy Consumption for Hexapod Robot Following Inclined Path Using Nontraditional Gait.” Unmanned Systems Technology XXIII, edited by Paul L. Muench et al., Apr. 2021, p. 1. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2584520

  30. [37]

    Optimization of Fuzzy Logic Controller Used for a Differential Drive Wheeled Mobile Robot

    Štefek, Alexandr, et al. “Optimization of Fuzzy Logic Controller Used for a Differential Drive Wheeled Mobile Robot.” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 13, June 2021, p. 6023. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11136023

  31. [38]

    Parallel Swarm Intelligent Motion Planning with Energy‐Balanced for Multirobot in Obstacle Environment

    Su, Shoubao, et al. “Parallel Swarm Intelligent Motion Planning with Energy‐Balanced for Multirobot in Obstacle Environment.” Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, edited by Xiaoxian Yang, vol. 2021, no. 1, Jan. 2021. Portico, Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8902328

  32. [39]

    Performance Analysis of Task Allocation for Mobile Robot Exploration Under Energy Constraints

    Soni, Ankit. “Performance Analysis of Task Allocation for Mobile Robot Exploration Under Energy Constraints.” 2021 13th International Conference on Information &amp; Communication Technology and System (ICTS), Oct. 2021, pp. 282–87. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1109/icts52701....

  33. [40]

    PID++: A Computationally Lightweight Humanoid Motion Control Algorithm

    Arciuolo, Thomas F., and Miad Faezipour. “PID++: A Computationally Lightweight Humanoid Motion Control Algorithm.” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 2, Jan. 2021, p. 456. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.3390/s21020456

  34. [41]

    Power Line Inspection Tasks With Multi-Aerial Robot Systems Via Signal Temporal Logic Specifications

    Silano, Giuseppe, et al. “Power Line Inspection Tasks With Multi-Aerial Robot Systems Via Signal Temporal Logic Specifications.” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 6, no. 2, Apr. 2021, pp. 4169 –76. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1109/lra.2021.3068114

  35. [42]

    Predicting the Energy Consumption of a Robot in an Exploration Task Using Optimized Neural Networks

    Caballero, Liesle, et al. “Predicting the Energy Consumption of a Robot in an Exploration Task Using Optimized Neural Networks.” Electronics, vol. 10, no. 8, Apr. 2021, p. 920. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10080920

  36. [43]

    Reinforcement Learning -Based Complete Area Coverage Path Planning for a Modified HTrihex Robot

    Apuroop, Koppaka Ganesh Sai, et al. “Reinforcement Learning -Based Complete Area Coverage Path Planning for a Modified HTrihex Robot.” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 4, Feb. 2021, p. 1067. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.3390/s21041067

  37. [44]

    Resource-Constrained Scheduling for Multi-Robot Cooperative Three-Dimensional Printing

    Poudel, Laxmi, et al. “Resource-Constrained Scheduling for Multi-Robot Cooperative Three-Dimensional Printing.” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 143, no. 7, Apr. 2021. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4050380

  38. [45]

    A Novel Energy Consumption Model for Autonomous Mobile Robot

    GÜRGÖZE, GÜRKAN, and İBRAHİM TÜRKOĞLU. “A Novel Energy Consumption Model for Autonomous Mobile Robot.” Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, vol. 30, no. 1, Jan. 2022, pp. 216–32. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.3906/elk-2103-15

  39. [46]

    A Novel Resolution Scheme of Time-Energy Optimal Trajectory for Precise Acceleration Controlled Industrial Robot Using Neural Networks

    Hou, Renluan, et al. “A Novel Resolution Scheme of Time-Energy Optimal Trajectory for Precise Acceleration Controlled Industrial Robot Using Neural Networks.” Actuators, vol. 11, no. 5, May 2022, p. 130. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.3390/act11050130

  40. [47]

    A Novel, Energy-Efficient Smart Speed Adaptation Based on the Gini Coefficient in Autonomous Mobile Robots

    Gürgöze, Gürkan, and İbrahim Türkoğlu. “A Novel, Energy-Efficient Smart Speed Adaptation Based on the Gini Coefficient in Autonomous Mobile Robots.” Electronics, vol. 11, no. 19, Sept. 2022, p. 2982. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11192982

  41. [48]

    An Energy-Efficient and Self-Triggered Control Method for Robot Swarm Networking Systems

    Byun, Heejung, and Soo-mi Yang. “An Energy-Efficient and Self-Triggered Control Method for Robot Swarm Networking Systems.” Measurement and Control, vol. 55, no. 9 –10, Aug. 2022, pp. 898–907. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1177/00202940221095534

  42. [49]

    Energy Saving Planner Model via Differential Evolutionary Algorithm for Bionic Palletizing Robot

    Deng, Yi, et al. “Energy Saving Planner Model via Differential Evolutionary Algorithm for Bionic Palletizing Robot.” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 19, Oct. 2022, p. 7545. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.3390/s22197545

  43. [50]

    Energy-Efficient Path Planning of Reconfigurable Robots in Complex Environments

    Kyaw, Phone Thiha, et al. “Energy-Efficient Path Planning of Reconfigurable Robots in Complex Environments.” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 38, no. 4, Aug. 2022, pp. 2481 –94. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1109/tro.2022.3147408

  44. [51]

    Evaluation of Selected Algorithms for Air Pollution Source Localisation Using Drones

    Suchanek, Grzegorz, et al. “Evaluation of Selected Algorithms for Air Pollution Source Localisation Using Drones.” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 5, Mar. 2022, p. 3049. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.3390/su14053049

  45. [52]

    Intelligent Energy Management System for Mobile Robot

    Lee, Min-Fan Ricky, and Asep Nugroho. “Intelligent Energy Management System for Mobile Robot.” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 16, Aug. 2022, p. 10056. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610056

  46. [53]

    Minimalist Coverage and Energy-Aware Tour Planning for a Mobile Robot

    Ghosh, Anirban, et al. “Minimalist Coverage and Energy-Aware Tour Planning for a Mobile Robot.” 2022 IEEE 18th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), Aug. 2022, pp. 2056 –61. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1109/case49997.2022.9926546

  47. [54]

    Modeling and Simulation Analysis of Energy Self -Sustainment Behavior Decision in Robot Ecosphere

    Nenghao, Hu, et al. “Modeling and Simulation Analysis of Energy Self -Sustainment Behavior Decision in Robot Ecosphere.” 2022 International Conference on Service Robotics (ICoSR), June 2022, pp. 10 –14. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1109/icosr57188.2022.00012

  48. [55]

    On the Effect of Heterogeneous Robot Fleets on Smart Warehouses’ Order Time, Energy, and Operating Costs

    Oliveira, George S., et al. “On the Effect of Heterogeneous Robot Fleets on Smart Warehouses’ Order Time, Energy, and Operating Costs.” 2022 XII Brazilian Symposium on Computing Systems Engineering (SBESC), Nov. 2022, pp. 1–8. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1109/sbesc56799.2022.9964584

  49. [56]

    Optimal Energy Consumption Path Planning for Quadrotor UAV Transmission Tower Inspection Based on Simulated Annealing Algorithm

    Wu, Min, et al. “Optimal Energy Consumption Path Planning for Quadrotor UAV Transmission Tower Inspection Based on Simulated Annealing Algorithm.” Energies, vol. 15, no. 21, Oct. 2022, p. 8036. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.3390/en15218036

  50. [57]

    Optimal Path Planning for Wireless Power Transfer Robot Using Area Division Deep Reinforcement Learning

    Xing, Yuan, et al. “Optimal Path Planning for Wireless Power Transfer Robot Using Area Division Deep Reinforcement Learning.” Wireless Power Transfer, vol. 9, no. 1, 2022, pp. 9921885 –9921885. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9921885

  51. [58]

    Performance Optimization of Fuel Cell Hybrid Power Robot Based on Power Demand Prediction and Model Evaluation

    Lü, Xueqin, et al. “Performance Optimization of Fuel Cell Hybrid Power Robot Based on Power Demand Prediction and Model Evaluation.” Applied Energy, vol. 316, June 2022, p. 119087. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119087

  52. [59]

    Simulation to Real: Learning Energy-Efficient Slithering Gaits for a Snake-Like Robot

    Bing, Zhenshan, et al. “Simulation to Real: Learning Energy-Efficient Slithering Gaits for a Snake-Like Robot.” IEEE Robotics &amp; Automation Magazine, vol. 29, no. 4, Dec. 2022, pp. 92 –103. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1109/mra.2022.3204237

  53. [60]

    TDE2-MBRL: Energy-Exchange Dynamics Learning with Task Decomposition for Spring-Loaded Bipedal Robot Locomotion

    Kuo, Cheng-Yu, et al. “TDE2-MBRL: Energy-Exchange Dynamics Learning with Task Decomposition for Spring-Loaded Bipedal Robot Locomotion.” 2022 IEEE-RAS 21st International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), Nov. 2022, pp. 550–57. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1109/humanoi...

  54. [61]

    Towards High-Quality Battery Life for Autonomous Mobile Robot Fleets

    Chavan, Akshar Shravan, and Marco Brocanelli. “Towards High-Quality Battery Life for Autonomous Mobile Robot Fleets.” 2022 IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing and Self -Organizing Systems (ACSOS), Sept. 2022, pp. 61–70. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1109/acsos5...

  55. [62]

    WearROBOT: An Energy Conservative Wearable Obstacle Detection Robot With LP Multi-Commodity Graph

    Okafor, Kennedy Chinedu, and Omowunmi Mary Longe. “WearROBOT: An Energy Conservative Wearable Obstacle Detection Robot With LP Multi-Commodity Graph.” IEEE Access, vol. 10, 2022, pp. 105843–65. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3211319

  56. [63]

    A Metaheuristic Approach to Optimal Morphology in Reconfigurable Tiling Robots

    Kalimuthu, Manivannan, et al. “A Metaheuristic Approach to Optimal Morphology in Reconfigurable Tiling Robots.” Complex &amp; Intelligent Systems, vol. 9, no. 5, Apr. 2023, pp. 5831 –50. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-023-01015-5

  57. [64]

    An Efficient Framework for Autonomous UAV Missions in Partially -Unknown GNSS-Denied Environments

    Mugnai, Michael, et al. “An Efficient Framework for Autonomous UAV Missions in Partially -Unknown GNSS-Denied Environments.” Drones, vol. 7, no. 7, July 2023, p. 471. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7070471

  58. [65]

    Automated Method Based on a Neural Network Model for Searching Energy - Efficient Complex Movement Trajectories of Industrial Robot in a Differentiated Technological Process

    Gorkavyy, Mikhail A., et al. “Automated Method Based on a Neural Network Model for Searching Energy - Efficient Complex Movement Trajectories of Industrial Robot in a Differentiated Technological Process.” Frontiers in Energy Research, vol. 11, Oct. 2023. Crossref, https://doi...

  59. [66]

    Collision-Free Navigation in Human-Following Task Using a Cognitive Robotic System on Differential Drive Vehicles

    Dang, Chien Van, et al. “Collision-Free Navigation in Human-Following Task Using a Cognitive Robotic System on Differential Drive Vehicles.” IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, vol. 15, no. 1, Mar. 2023, pp. 78–87. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1109/tcds.2...

  60. [67]

    Decentralized and Centralized Planning for Multi -Robot Additive Manufacturing

    Poudel, Laxmi, et al. “Decentralized and Centralized Planning for Multi -Robot Additive Manufacturing.” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 145, no. 1, Oct. 2022. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4055735

  61. [68]

    Energy-Efficient and Quality-Aware Part Placement in Robotic Additive Manufacturing

    Ghungrad, Suyog, et al. “Energy-Efficient and Quality-Aware Part Placement in Robotic Additive Manufacturing.” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 68, June 2023, pp. 644 –50. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.05.019

  62. [69]

    Energy-Efficient Blockchain-Enabled Multi-Robot Coordination for Information Gathering: Theory and Experiments

    Castellon, Cesar E., et al. “Energy-Efficient Blockchain-Enabled Multi-Robot Coordination for Information Gathering: Theory and Experiments.” Electronics, vol. 12, no. 20, Oct. 2023, p. 4239. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12204239

  63. [70]

    Energy-Saving Control of Rolling Speed for Spherical Robot Based on Regenerative Damping

    Li, Yansheng, et al. “Energy-Saving Control of Rolling Speed for Spherical Robot Based on Regenerative Damping.” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 111, no. 8, Jan. 2023, pp. 7235–50. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071- 023-08233-z

  64. [71]

    Investigation on the Mobile Wheeled Robot in Terms of Energy Consumption, Travelling Time and Path Matching Accuracy

    Szeląg, Piotr, et al. “Investigation on the Mobile Wheeled Robot in Terms of Energy Consumption, Travelling Time and Path Matching Accuracy.” Energies, vol. 16, no. 3, Jan. 2023, p. 1210. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.3390/en16031210

  65. [72]

    Optimization of Energy Consumption of Industrial Robots Using Classical PID and MPC Controllers

    Benotsmane, Rabab, and György Kovács. “Optimization of Energy Consumption of Industrial Robots Using Classical PID and MPC Controllers.” Energies, vol. 16, no. 8, Apr. 2023, p. 3499. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083499

  66. [73]

    Optimize Path Planning for Drone -Based Wireless Power Transfer System by Categorized Reinforcement Learning

    Xing, Yuan, and Abhishek Verma. “Optimize Path Planning for Drone -Based Wireless Power Transfer System by Categorized Reinforcement Learning.” 2023 IEEE 13th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC), Mar. 2023, pp. 0641–46. Crossref, https://doi.org/1...

  67. [74]

    Overcoming Obstacles With a Reconfigurable Robot Using Deep Reinforcement Learning Based on a Mechanical Work-Energy Reward Function

    Simhon, Or, et al. “Overcoming Obstacles With a Reconfigurable Robot Using Deep Reinforcement Learning Based on a Mechanical Work-Energy Reward Function.” IEEE Access, vol. 11, 2023, pp. 47681–89. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3274675

  68. [75]

    Power Consumption Modeling of Wheeled Mobile Robots With Multiple Driving Modes

    Kumar, Pushpendra, et al. “Power Consumption Modeling of Wheeled Mobile Robots With Multiple Driving Modes.” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 70, no. 10, Oct. 2023, pp. 10282 –91. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2022.3217603

  69. [76]

    The Energy Efficiency Multi-Robot System and Disinfection Service Robot Development in Large-Scale Complex Environment

    Chen, Chin-Sheng, et al. “The Energy Efficiency Multi-Robot System and Disinfection Service Robot Development in Large-Scale Complex Environment.” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 12, June 2023, p. 5724. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.3390/s23125724

  70. [77]

    The Need for Task-Specific Execution in Robot Manipulation: Skill Design for Energy- Efficient Control

    Deroo, Boris, et al. “The Need for Task-Specific Execution in Robot Manipulation: Skill Design for Energy- Efficient Control.” 2023 IEEE 19th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), Aug. 2023, pp. 1–7. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1109/case56687....

  71. [78]

    A Data-Driven Method for Predicting and Optimizing Industrial Robot Energy Consumption Under Unknown Load Conditions

    Chang, Qing, et al. “A Data-Driven Method for Predicting and Optimizing Industrial Robot Energy Consumption Under Unknown Load Conditions.” Actuators, vol. 13, no. 12, Dec. 2024, p. 516. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.3390/act13120516

  72. [79]

    A Maintenance-Aware Approach for Sustainable Autonomous Mobile Robot Fleet Management

    Atik, Syeda Tanjila, et al. “A Maintenance-Aware Approach for Sustainable Autonomous Mobile Robot Fleet Management.” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 23, no. 6, June 2024, pp. 7394 –407. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1109/tmc.2023.3334589

  73. [80]

    BN-LSTM-Based Energy Consumption Modeling Approach for an Industrial Robot Manipulator

    Lin, Hsien-I., et al. “BN-LSTM-Based Energy Consumption Modeling Approach for an Industrial Robot Manipulator.” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 85, Feb. 2024, p. 102629. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2023.102629

  74. [81]

    Cognitive Model Predictive Learning Cooperative Control to Optimize Electric Power Consumption and User-Friendliness in Human–Robot Co-Manipulation

    Rahman, S. M. Mizanoor. “Cognitive Model Predictive Learning Cooperative Control to Optimize Electric Power Consumption and User-Friendliness in Human–Robot Co-Manipulation.” Intelligent Sustainable Systems, 2024, pp. 515–24. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7886-1_43

  75. [82]

    Coordinated Ship Welding with Optimal Lazy Robot Ratio and Energy Consumption via Reinforcement Learning

    Yu, Rui, and Yang-Yang Chen. “Coordinated Ship Welding with Optimal Lazy Robot Ratio and Energy Consumption via Reinforcement Learning.” Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, vol. 12, no. 10, Oct. 2024, p. 1765. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12101765

  76. [83]

    Design of a Robust Intelligent Controller Based Neural Network for Trajectory Tracking of High-Speed Wheeled Robots

    Xue, Wenkui, et al. “Design of a Robust Intelligent Controller Based Neural Network for Trajectory Tracking of High-Speed Wheeled Robots.” Physica Scripta, vol. 99, no. 11, Oct. 2024, p. 115023. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad8486

  77. [84]

    Energy Consumption Minimization of Quadruped Robot Based on Reinforcement Learning of DDPG Algorithm

    Yan, Zhenzhuo, et al. “Energy Consumption Minimization of Quadruped Robot Based on Reinforcement Learning of DDPG Algorithm.” Actuators, vol. 13, no. 1, Jan. 2024, p. 18. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.3390/act13010018

  78. [85]

    Energy Efficient Robot Operations by Adaptive Control Schemes

    Choi, Minje, et al. “Energy Efficient Robot Operations by Adaptive Control Schemes.” Oxford Open Energy, vol. 3, 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1093/ooenergy/oiae012

  79. [86]

    Managing Energy Consumption of Linear Delta Robots Using Neural Network Models

    Vodovozov, Valery, et al. “Managing Energy Consumption of Linear Delta Robots Using Neural Network Models.” Energies, vol. 17, no. 16, Aug. 2024, p. 4081. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.3390/en17164081

  80. [87]

    Multiobjective Energy Consumption Optimization of a Flying –Walking Power Transmission Line Inspection Robot during Flight Missions Using Improved NSGA -II

    Wang, Yanqi, et al. “Multiobjective Energy Consumption Optimization of a Flying –Walking Power Transmission Line Inspection Robot during Flight Missions Using Improved NSGA -II.” Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 4, Feb. 2024, p. 1637. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.3390/app14041637

  81. [88]

    Omnidirectional AGV Path Planning Based on Improved Genetic Algorithm

    Niu, Qinyu, et al. “Omnidirectional AGV Path Planning Based on Improved Genetic Algorithm.” World Electric Vehicle Journal, vol. 15, no. 4, Apr. 2024, p. 166. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj15040166

  82. [89]

    Optimizing Robotic Task Sequencing and Trajectory Planning on the Basis of Deep Reinforcement Learning

    Dong, Xiaoting, et al. “Optimizing Robotic Task Sequencing and Trajectory Planning on the Basis of Deep Reinforcement Learning.” Biomimetics, vol. 9, no. 1, Dec. 2023, p. 10. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics9010010

  83. [90]

    Research the Potential for Energy Saving and Maximizing Productivity in Rectilinear Transitions of a Collaborative Robot

    Gorkavyy, Mikhail, et al. “Research the Potential for Energy Saving and Maximizing Productivity in Rectilinear Transitions of a Collaborative Robot.” 2024 International Russian Smart Industry Conference (SmartIndustryCon), Mar. 2024, pp. 912–16. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.11...

  84. [91]

    Robot Environment Modeling and Motion Control Approach for Sustainable Energy Savings in Mobile Robot Landmine Surveillance Mission

    Nagapriya, C. N., and S. Denis Ashok. “Robot Environment Modeling and Motion Control Approach for Sustainable Energy Savings in Mobile Robot Landmine Surveillance Mission.” Recent Advances in Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2024, pp. 465–74. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.10...

  85. [92]

    Spike-Based High Energy Efficiency and Accuracy Tracker for Robot

    Qu, Jinye, et al. “Spike-Based High Energy Efficiency and Accuracy Tracker for Robot.” 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Oct. 2024, pp. 1428 –34. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1109/iros58592.2024.10801326

  86. [93]

    The Development of a Neural Network Surrogate Model for Estimating Energy and Travel Time for a Collaborative Robot

    Bouchra, Khoumeri, et al. “The Development of a Neural Network Surrogate Model for Estimating Energy and Travel Time for a Collaborative Robot.” 2024 6th International Conference on Pattern Analysis and Intelligent Systems (PAIS), Apr. 2024, pp. 1–6. Crossref, https://doi.org/...

  87. [94]

    Three-Dimensional Spatial Energy-Quality Map Construction for Optimal Robot Placement in Multi-Robot Additive Manufacturing

    Ghungrad, Suyog, and Azadeh Haghighi. “Three-Dimensional Spatial Energy-Quality Map Construction for Optimal Robot Placement in Multi-Robot Additive Manufacturing.” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 88, Aug. 2024, p. 102735. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1016...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.