Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 34 references

Kinetic SDEs with subcritical distributional drifts

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Kinetic SDEs with subcritical distribution-valued drifts have unique weak solutions whenever the drift's velocity divergence is as regular as the drift itself, with Krylov estimates and moment bounds.

desk verdict Solid new step into the subcritical range for kinetic SDEs, but the main theorem overclaims the Krylov range for weighted drifts because the reduction to the unweighted condition loses regularity. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.12234 v1 pith:MA6CZQJT submitted 2025-08-17 math.PR

Zikai Chen , Zimo Hao , Xicheng Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PR MSC 60H1060J6035K7060G60
keywords kineticSDEsdistributionaldriftanisotropicHölderspaceparaproductKrylovestimateweakwell-posednessGaussianrandomfieldsmartingaleproblem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that a degenerate kinetic SDE - position driven by velocity, velocity driven by Brownian noise plus a distribution-valued drift - is well posed whenever the drift is subcritical (Hölder exponent $\alpha_b\in(-1,0)$ with integrability $q_b>2/(1+\alpha_b)$) and its velocity divergence has the same Hölder regularity as the drift itself. The weak solution is defined through a mollification limit: integrals of the mollified drifts against the path converge in $L^2$, and the limiting process satisfies the Krylov estimate (1.11), which controls occupation-time integrals by the anisotropic Hölder norm of the test function, together with a moment bound in weighted distance. Along the way the paper builds a weighted Schauder theory for the associated kinetic Kolmogorov equation, and the main well-posedness theorem also covers drifts decomposed into a singular Hölder piece plus a regular piece with linear growth. This matters because distribution-valued drifts arise naturally as Gaussian random fields modelling particles in a random environment, and earlier frequency-splitting treatments only reached Hölder exponents between $-2/3$ and $-1/2$; the present result spans the whole subcritical interval $(-1,0)$ at the price of the divergence condition.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing construction is a paraproduct (frequency-splitting) calculus on weighted anisotropic Hölder spaces $C_a^\alpha(\rho_\kappa)$, whose scaling vector $a=(3,1)$ encodes the kinetic relation that position scales like the cube of velocity. The product $b\cdot\nabla_v u$, meaningless for distributional $b$, is redefined as $b\odot\nabla_v u-(\operatorname{div}_v b)\prec\!\!u$ with $\prec$ the low-frequency paraproduct; the key estimate (2.16) shows the second term is controlled exactly when $\operatorname{div}_v b$ lies in the same Hölder space as $b$. With this product, the kinetic Kolmogorov equation $\partial_t u=\Delta_v u-v\cdot\nabla_x u-\lambda u+b\cdot\nabla_v u+f$ is solved by localization to anisotropic balls and sharp Schauder estimates, giving the weighted regularity of $u$ used to derive Krylov bounds for the approximating SDEs. Uniqueness rests on a generalized Itô formula (Lemma 4.10) plus a martingale-problem argument with stopping-time localization.

What would settle it

Construct a drift from the Gaussian field of Example 5.3 multiplied by a $v$-profile $\eta$ that is only $\alpha_b$-Hölder in $v$, so that $b\in C_a^{\alpha_b}$ but $\operatorname{div}_v b$ is one order rougher, and check whether the paraproduct estimate (2.16) and then the mollified drift integral in Definition 1.1 still behave as claimed. If (2.16) fails and the $L^2$ limit of $\int_0^t b_n(s,Z_s)\,ds$ is not finite, the divergence regularity is genuinely load-bearing; if the limit exists and is unique anyway, the theorem's assumption is stronger than needed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim (Theorem 1.4) is that if $b\in L_T^{q_b}C_a^{\alpha_b}(\rho_\kappa)$ with $\alpha_b\in(-1,0)$, $q_b\in(2/(1+\alpha_b),\infty]$, $\kappa\in[0,1+\alpha_b)$ and $\operatorname{div}_v b$ belongs to the same weighted anisotropic Hölder space, then for every starting point $z_0$ and every $p\ge2$ there is a unique weak solution to $dX_t=V_t\,dt$, $dV_t=b(t,X_t,V_t)\,dt+\sqrt{2}\,dW_t$. Weak solution means the mollified drift integrals $\int_0^t b_n(s,Z_s)\,ds$ converge in $L^2$ and the limiting path is well defined; the solution satisfies Krylov's estimate (1.11) and the moment bound $\mathbb{E}\sup_t\rho_\delta(Z_t)\le C\rho_\delta(z_0)$. The theorem also holds for $b=b_1+b_2$ with $b_1$ singular and $b_2$ a regular drift of at most linear growth (Theorem 4.19). The route is to solve the kinetic Kolmogorov equation with the distributional drift interpreted through paraproducts, use the resulting regularity to get uniform Krylov estimates for approximating diffusions, and prove uniqueness through a generalized Itô formula and a martingale-problem argument.

Load-bearing premise

The argument requires the velocity divergence of the singular part of the drift to be exactly as regular as the drift itself (the same Hölder exponent in the same weighted space); if $\operatorname{div}_v b$ is a degree rougher, the paraproduct estimate that makes $b\cdot\nabla_v u$ meaningful fails and the construction cannot start.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every subcritical Hölder exponent $\alpha_b\in(-1,0)$ is now covered for weak well-posedness, so the obstruction left by earlier treatments is the divergence condition rather than the Hölder exponent.
  • The Krylov estimate (1.11) and its weighted version (1.12) give quantitative control of occupation-time integrals; as the paper notes, this implies the transition law admits a density with weighted anisotropic Besov regularity.
  • The moment bound $\mathbb{E}\sup_t\rho_\delta(Z_t)\le C\rho_\delta(z_0)$ means the solution inherits polynomial growth or decay from the weight, so both confined and heavy-tailed initial data are within scope.
  • For $b=b_1+b_2$, adding a regular drift of at most linear growth preserves uniqueness, so rough random-field terms can be combined with smooth confining or forcing terms without leaving the theory.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper explicitly leaves the supercritical regime $2/q>1+\alpha$ open; since the Schauder scale gives $\nabla_x u$ no regularity there, crossing that threshold would require a qualitatively different energy or renormalization argument.
  • Because the sole extra condition is on $\operatorname{div}_v b$, the method suggests that divergence-free random drifts — the physically natural class for velocity fields — are exactly where the subcritical threshold is the real frontier, and one could try to push $\alpha_b$ toward $-1$ by exploiting the vanishing of the dangerous paraproduct term.
  • The weighted estimates (1.12) open a duality route to quantitative density bounds: the transition density lies in weighted Besov spaces by Remark 1.6, so extracting explicit heat-kernel upper bounds from the same localization machinery is a natural next step.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies weak well-posedness of the kinetic SDE (1.3) with a distributional drift b in weighted anisotropic Hölder spaces L^{q_b}_T C^{α_b}_a(ρ_κ), where α_b∈(-1,0), κ∈[0,1+α_b), and with a bounded velocity divergence. Weak solutions are defined via mollified drifts and an L²-limit of the drift integrals (Definition 1.1). The authors prove Schauder-type estimates for the associated kinetic PDE using paraproducts (Theorem 3.6), derive uniform Krylov estimates for the approximating SDEs (Lemma 4.5), obtain existence by tightness and Skorokhod representation (Theorem 4.9), and prove uniqueness via a generalized Itô formula and martingale-problem localization (Theorems 4.10--4.19). Theorem 1.4 states existence, uniqueness, Krylov estimates, and moment bounds for all κ∈[0,1+α_b), with an additional weighted Krylov estimate for smaller κ. Section 5 applies the result to divergence-free Gaussian random fields.

Significance. If the central theorem is correct, this is a substantial extension: it pushes the admissible negative regularity for kinetic SDE drifts from the paracontrolled range α∈(-2/3,-1/2) in [17] to all α∈(-1,0), while allowing polynomial weights in the drift. The proof combines several nontrivial tools: weighted anisotropic Hölder spaces, Bony paraproducts for distributional drifts, localization in PDE Schauder theory, Krylov estimates for approximating SDEs, and martingale-problem uniqueness. The Gaussian example (Example 5.3) gives a concrete family of admissible drifts. The main shortcoming is that the proof of Theorem 1.4 relies on a reduction that loses regularity in κ, so the stated full range of α for κ>0 is not established by the arguments given.

major comments (2)
  1. [4] The reduction of the weighted hypothesis b∈L^{q_b}_T C^{α_b}_a(ρ_κ) to assumption (Hsub) via Remark 4.1 produces a rough component b1 in C^{α_b−κ}_a, not in C^{α_b}_a. Since Theorem 4.19 requires b1∈L^{q_b}_T C^{α_b}_a and returns Krylov's estimate only for α∈(-1,α_b], the actual chain of implications gives α∈(-1,α_b−κ] for κ>0. Thus the stated range α∈(-1,α_b] in Theorem 1.4 is unsupported for κ>0, including the regime κ∈((1+α_b−2/q_b)/(3+α_b−2/q_b),1+α_b) where the weighted assumption (Hsub_w) is unavailable. The theorem should either be restated with the reduced exponent α_b−κ, or Remark 4.1 must be strengthened to preserve the original regularity α_b in the unweighted rough component.
  2. [4] The reduction in Remark 4.1 also does not verify the divergence condition required by (Hsub). To apply Theorem 4.19 one needs div_v b1∈L^{q_b}_T C^{α_b}_a, but the hypotheses of Theorem 1.4 give at most a bounded, or L^{q_b}_T C^{α_b}_a, divergence for b, and differentiating the component b1∈C^{α_b−κ}_a loses one more derivative of v-regularity. The statement of Theorem 1.4 uses the phrase 'bounded divergence in v' while Theorem 1.2 and (Hsub_w) use div_v b∈L^{q_b}_T C^{α_b}_a; this ambiguity matters because Lemma 2.8 and the generalized Itô formula in Lemma 4.10 require paraproduct estimates for the divergence term. Please state the exact divergence assumption and prove that a decomposition satisfying (4.1) exists under it.
minor comments (5)
  1. [1.1] The phrase 'bounded divergence in v' should be made precise; in Theorem 1.2 and in (Hsub_w) the condition is div_v b∈L^{q_b}_T C^{α_b}_a, whereas in Theorem 1.4 it could be read as merely div_v b∈L∞.
  2. [1.1] When κ equals the upper endpoint (1+α_b−2/q_b)/(3+α_b−2/q_b), the lower endpoint of the α-interval in (1.12) coincides with α_b, so the stated interval is empty; either exclude the endpoint or give a limiting interpretation.
  3. [5] After deriving U∈L^p(Ω;C^β_a(ρ_κ)) for β<3(γ−d)/2−4d/p, the paper should explicitly state that one chooses β∈(-1,0) so that the hypotheses α_b∈(-1,0) of Theorem 1.4 are met, and should verify κ∈[0,1+β) for the chosen p.
  4. [2] There are several typographical issues: 'Schwarz space' should be 'Schwartz space', 'Prohorov' is usually spelled 'Prokhorov', and the displayed formula in the proof of Lemma 3.3 contains a stray period in '∥I^λ_ . (f)∥'.
  5. [1.1] The lower bound in the α-range in Theorem 1.2, α>2/q_b+(3κ−1)/(1−κ), deserves a brief explanation of its provenance, since it is not immediately evident why this combination of κ and q_b appears.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main well-posedness theorem is derived from external PDE estimates and compactness arguments, not from a fitted input or from the theorem itself.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained in the relevant sense: Theorem 1.4 and Theorem 4.19 prove existence and uniqueness of weak solutions via the kinetic PDE estimates of Theorem 3.6, a priori Krylov bounds for the mollified approximating SDEs (Lemma 4.5), tightness/Skorokhod passage to the limit (Theorem 4.9), and a martingale-problem uniqueness argument (Lemma 4.10 and Theorems 4.11, 4.18). The paper leans on the same group's prior work ([14], [15], [16], [17]) for Schauder estimates, paraproduct bounds, localization, and the weighted-decomposition lemma, but these are separate mathematical inputs with their own proofs; they are not restatements of the present SDE well-posedness claim, and the paper does not fit any parameter to data and then call the fit a prediction. The proof of Theorem 1.4 does invoke Remark 4.1 to pass from a weighted drift b in L^{q_b}_T C^{α_b}_a(ρ_κ) to the unweighted decomposition (Hsub), and the skeptic's note correctly observes a potential regularity mismatch: Remark 4.1 gives b1 ∈ C^{α_b−κ}_a rather than C^{α_b}_a when κ>0, so Theorem 4.19 as stated may only deliver the Krylov range α∈(-1,α_b−κ] unless the decomposition is sharpened. That is a possible correctness gap in the reduction, but it is not circularity: the claimed result is not identical to its hypothesis by construction, and the issue is one of regularity loss in a cited lemma, not of a fitted parameter being renamed as a prediction or of a uniqueness theorem imported as an external fact when the proof itself is the source of that uniqueness. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input by definition. Hence the appropriate finding is no significant circularity, with a low score reflecting only the heavy reliance on prior self-citations for intermediate estimates.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted parameters or new postulated entities. All regularity exponents (alpha_b, q_b, kappa) and the weight rho_kappa are hypotheses of the theorems, not constants fitted to data. The assumptions are explicit, and the only new object is the weak-solution definition via mollified limits, which is a definition rather than a postulated physical entity.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Resolvent Schauder estimates for the nondegenerate kinetic operator Delta_v - v dot grad_x from [14, Theorem 2.17]
    Used in Lemma 3.3 (bound (3.8)), in the proof of Theorem 3.4, and in Lemma 4.5 to convert PDE solution regularity into Lp control of additive functionals; it supplies the sharp regularity gain 2+alpha-2/q for the kinetic Kolmogorov equation.
  • domain assumption Maximum principle for kinetic PDEs with smooth coefficients from [15, Theorem 6.2]
    Used in Lemma 3.5 to get the bound ||u_n||_{L_infinity_T} <= T||f||_{L_infinity_T} for mollified drifts, which underlies the L_infinity estimate (3.14) and the interpolation argument in Theorem 3.4.
  • domain assumption Decomposition of weighted Holder drifts b in C^{alpha_b}_a(rho_kappa) into a singular unweighted part b1 in C^{alpha_b-kappa}_a and a regular linearly growing part b2, from [16, Appendix A]
    Remark 4.1 uses this to show Theorem 1.4's assumptions imply (Hsub); it is essential for reducing the weighted problem to the unweighted SDE machinery of Section 4.
  • domain assumption Foellmer-type generalized Ito calculus for processes with drift terms defined via mollified limits, from [9] and [33, Lemma 3.6]
    Lemma 4.10 applies this to derive the Ito formula (4.26) for u_n(t,Z_t) when the drift is only defined through the mollification limit; this is the key step for uniqueness.
  • standard math Paraproduct (Bony decomposition) estimates for weighted anisotropic Holder spaces, proved as Lemma 2.6 following [17, Lemma 2.11]
    These estimates define the products b circle grad_v u and div_v b 'prec' u in (2.14)-(2.16), which are the foundation for the PDE and SDE arguments with negative-regularity drifts.
  • standard math Standard martingale problem uniqueness and Markov process machinery from [6, Theorem 4.4.3] and Stroock-Varadhan localization [26]
    Theorem 4.11 concludes weak uniqueness from equality of one-dimensional marginals, and Theorem 4.18 glues local uniqueness via stopping times and the measure concatenation Lemma 4.16.
  • standard math Gaussian noise hypercontractivity and spectral measure representation from [20] and [25]
    Theorem 5.2 uses hypercontractivity of Gaussian random variables and the spectral covariance (5.1) to prove almost sure Holder regularity of the field U; [25, p.117] gives the covariance kernel for the fractional spectral measure.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Kinetic SDEs with subcritical distributional drifts." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MA6CZQJT

@misc{pith2026250812234,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Kinetic SDEs with subcritical distributional drifts},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MA6CZQJT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.12234}
}
abstract

In this paper we study the well-posedness of the kinetic stochastic differential equation (SDE) in $\mathbb R^{2d}(d\geq2)$ driven by Brownian motion: $$\mathord{{\rm d}} X_t=V_t\mathord{{\rm d}} t,\ \mathord{{\rm d}} V_t=b(t,X_t,V_t)\mathord{{\rm d}} t+\sqrt{2}\mathord{{\rm d}} W_t,$$ where the subcritical distribution-valued drift $b$ belongs to the weighted anisotropic H\"{o}lder space $\mathbb L_T^{q_b}\mathbf C_{\boldsymbol{a}}^{\alpha_b}(\rho_\kappa)$ with parameters $\alpha_b\in(-1,0)$, $q_b\in(\frac{2}{1+\alpha_b},\infty]$, $\kappa\in[0,1+\alpha_b)$ and $\div_v b$ is bounded. We establish the well-posedness of weak solutions to the associated integral equation: $$X_t=X_0+\int_0^t V_s\mathord{{\rm d}} s,\ V_t=V_0+\lim_{n\to\infty}\int_0^t b_n(s,X_s,V_s)\mathord{{\rm d}}+\sqrt{2}W_t,$$ where $b_n:=b*\Gamma_n$ denotes the mollification of $b$ and the limit is taken in the $L^2$-sense. As an application, we discuss examples of $b$ involving Gaussian random fields.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [17]

    Z. Hao, X. Zhang, R. Zhu, and X. Zhu, Singular kinetic equations and applications. Ann. Probab., 52 (2024), 576–657

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    Bahouri, J.-Y

    H. Bahouri, J.-Y. Chemin, and R. Danchin, Fourier analysis and nonlinear partial differential equations . Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], Vol.343. Springer, Heidelberg, 2011, xvi+523

    work page 2011

  3. [2]

    P. E. Chaudru de Raynal, Strong existence and uniqueness for degenerate SDE with H¨ older drift. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Probab. Stat., 53 (2017), 259–286

    work page 2017

  4. [3]

    Chaudru de Raynal, I

    P.- ´E. Chaudru de Raynal, I. Honor´ e, and S. Menozzi, Sharp Schauder estimates for some degenerate Kolmogorov equations. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) , 22 (2021), 989–1089

    work page 2021

  5. [4]

    Chaudru de Raynal and S

    P.- ´E. Chaudru de Raynal and S. Menozzi, Regularization effects of a noise propagating through a chain of differential equations: an almost sharp result. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 375 (2022), 1–45

    work page 2022

  6. [5]

    Z.-Q. Chen, X. Zhang, and G. Zhao, Supercritical SDEs driven by multiplicative stable-like L´ evy processes. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 374 (2021), 7621–7655

    work page 2021

  7. [6]

    S. N. Ethier and T. G. Kurtz, Markov processes: Characterization and convergence. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics: Probability and Mathematical Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1986, x+534

    work page 1986

  8. [7]

    Fannjiang, Anomalous diffusion in random flows , Mathematics of multiscale materials (Minneapolis, MN, 1995), IMA Vol

    A. Fannjiang, Anomalous diffusion in random flows , Mathematics of multiscale materials (Minneapolis, MN, 1995), IMA Vol. Math. Appl., vol. 99, Springer, New York, 1998, pp. 81–99, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-1728-2 6. MR1636019

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1728-2 1995

Show all 34 references
  1. [8]

    Fedrizzi, F

    E. Fedrizzi, F. Flandoli, E. Priola, and J. Vovelle, Regularity of stochastic kinetic equations. Electron. J. Probab., 22 (2017), Paper No. 48, 42

    2017

  2. [9]

    F¨ ollmer, Calcul d’Itˆ o sans probabilit´ es.Seminar on Probability, XV (1981), 143–150

    H. F¨ ollmer, Calcul d’Itˆ o sans probabilit´ es.Seminar on Probability, XV (1981), 143–150

    1981

  3. [10]

    Grothaus, P

    M. Grothaus, P. Ren, and F.-Y. Wang, Singular degenerate SDEs: Well-posedness and exponential ergodicity. J. Differential Equations , 413 (2024), 632–661

    2024

  4. [11]

    Gubinelli, P

    M. Gubinelli, P. Imkeller, and N. Perkowski, Paracontrolled distributions and singular PDEs. Forum Math. Pi, 3 (2015), e6, 75

    2015

  5. [12]

    Hairer, A theory of regularity structures

    M. Hairer, A theory of regularity structures. Invent. Math., 198 (2014), 269–504

    2014

  6. [13]

    Hairer and P

    M. Hairer and P. K. Friz, A course on rough paths . Universitext. Springer, Cham, 2020, xvi+346

    2020

  7. [14]

    Z. Hao, M. R¨ ockner, and X. Zhang, Second order fractional mean-field SDEs with singular kernels and measure initial data (2023). To appear in Ann.Probab. arXiv:2302.04392

    2023 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Z. Hao, M. Wu, and X. Zhang, Schauder estimates for nonlocal kinetic equations and applications. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) , 140 (2020), 139–184

    2020

  9. [16]

    Hao and X

    Z. Hao and X. Zhang, SDEs with supercritical distributional drifts (2023). To appear in Comm. Math. Phys. arXiv:2312.11145

    2023 arXiv

  10. [18]

    H´ erau and F

    F. H´ erau and F. Nier, Isotropic hypoellipticity and trend to equilibrium for the Fokker-Planck equation with a high-degree potential. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 171 (2004), 151–218

    2004

  11. [19]

    Issoglio, S

    E. Issoglio, S. Pagliarani, F. Russo, and D. Trevisani, Degenerate McKean-Vlasov equations with drift in anisotropic negative H¨ older spaces (2024). arXiv:2401.09165

    2024

  12. [20]

    Janson, Gaussian Hilbert spaces

    S. Janson, Gaussian Hilbert spaces. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, Vol.129. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997, x+340

    1997

  13. [21]

    J. C. Mattingly, A. M. Stuart, and D. J. Higham, Ergodicity for SDEs and approximations: locally Lipschitz vector fields and degenerate noise. Stochastic Process. Appl., 101 (2002), 185–232

    2002

  14. [22]

    Parisi and Y

    G. Parisi and Y. S. Wu, Perturbation theory without gauge fixing. Sci. Sinica, 24 (1981), 483–496

    1981

  15. [23]

    R. G. Pinsky, Positive harmonic functions and diffusion . Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Vol.45. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995, xvi+474

    1995

  16. [24]

    Revuz and M

    D. Revuz and M. Yor, Continuous martingales and Brownian motion . Grundlehren der mathematischen Wis- senschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], Vol.293. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999, xiv+602

    1999

  17. [25]

    E. M. Stein, Singular integrals and differentiability properties of functions . Princeton Mathematical Series, Vol.No. 30. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1970, xiv+290. KINETIC SDES WITH SUBCRITICAL DISTRIBUTIONAL DRIFTS 29

    1970

  18. [26]

    D. W. Stroock and S. R. S. Varadhan, Multidimensional diffusion processes. Classics in Mathematics. Springer- Verlag, Berlin, 2006, xii+338

    2006

  19. [27]

    Triebel, Theory of function spaces

    H. Triebel, Theory of function spaces. III . Monographs in Mathematics, Vol.100. Birkh¨ auser Verlag, Basel, 2006, xii+426

    2006

  20. [28]

    Van Kampen, Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry

    N. Van Kampen, Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry . Elsevier, 2011

    2011

  21. [29]

    Villani, Hypocoercivity

    C. Villani, Hypocoercivity. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. , 202 (2009), iv+141

    2009

  22. [30]

    Wang and X

    F.-Y. Wang and X. Zhang, Degenerate SDE with H¨ older-Dini drift and non-Lipschitz noise coefficient. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 48 (2016), 2189–2226

    2016

  23. [31]

    Zhang, Stochastic Hamiltonian flows with singular coefficients

    X. Zhang, Stochastic Hamiltonian flows with singular coefficients. Sci. China Math. , 61 (2018), 1353–1384

    2018

  24. [32]

    Zhang, Second order McKean-Vlasov SDEs and kinetic Fokker-Planck-Kolmogorov equations (2021)

    X. Zhang, Second order McKean-Vlasov SDEs and kinetic Fokker-Planck-Kolmogorov equations (2021). To appear in Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S . arXiv:2109.01273

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Zhang and G

    X. Zhang and G. Zhao, Heat kernel and ergodicity of SDEs with distributional drifts (2017). arXiv:1710.10537

    2017 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Zhang and G

    X. Zhang and G. Zhao, Singular Brownian diffusion processes. Commun. Math. Stat. , 6 (2018), 533–581

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.