Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 152 references

Inverse Weak measurement in SERF magnetometer

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Inverse weak measurement readout reaches 182.8 fT/√Hz sensitivity in a SERF magnetometer while improving long-term stability by one to two orders of magnitude.

desk verdict The abstract's IWM-SERF claim is plausible but unauditable: the attached full text is an unrelated 2HDM paper. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.12306 v1 pith:7KDBP4WF submitted 2025-08-17 physics.ins-det

classification physics.ins-det
keywords SERFmagnetometerinverseweakmeasurementatomicmagnetometrypost-selectionopticalreadoutmagneticfieldsensitivityAllandeviationprobelaserpolarization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a spin-exchange relaxation-free (SERF) magnetometer can be read out with inverse weak measurement (IWM), a scheme in which the probe beam's spatial pattern is the measurement pointer and its polarization is the system that feels the magnetic field. Post-selecting on the polarization amplifies the tiny pointer displacement caused by an ultra-weak field, with an amplification factor that grows as the coupling shrinks. Working from the displacement-versus-field response curve, the authors identify the point of maximum sensitivity and report 182.8 fT/Hz^(1/2). They further report that the IWM signal depends only on the probe's internal degrees of freedom, so the readout rejects laser power fluctuations, improving Allan-deviation stability by one to two orders of magnitude relative to conventional detection. A sympathetic reader would care because sub-200 fT/√Hz sensitivity with improved stability is the regime needed for practical ultra-sensitive magnetometry.

What carries the argument

The central object is the inverse weak measurement (IWM) readout: the probe laser's spatial mode serves as the pointer, its polarization as the system, and a polarizer performs post-selection. The mechanism is that a weak coupling between spatial pattern and polarization, combined with post-selection, converts a small magnetic-field-induced polarization rotation into a large, measurable displacement of the beam profile, with amplification inversely proportional to the coupling strength. The response curve of this displacement versus magnetic field supplies the calibration that lets the authors pick the maximum-sensitivity operating point, and the dependence of the signal on internal rather than external degrees of freedom is what suppresses laser power noise.

What would settle it

Run the same SERF magnetometer with IWM and conventional readouts at equal probe power and bandwidth, then deliberately step the laser power by a few percent; if the IWM Allan deviation degrades as much as the conventional one, the power-robustness claim fails. Separately, vary the spatial-polarization coupling strength and check that the measured displacement amplification grows inversely with coupling; a flat or saturating gain curve would falsify the amplification mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the inverse weak measurement readout proposed here, the probe laser's transverse spatial pattern is weakly coupled to its polarization, and the polarization itself responds to the external magnetic field. After post-selection on the polarization, the spatial pattern is displaced by an amount amplified by a factor inversely proportional to the coupling strength, so weaker couplings give larger readout displacements. The authors analyze the displacement response as a function of magnetic field, locate the operating point of maximum sensitivity, and demonstrate a magnetic field sensitivity of 182.8 fT/Hz^(1/2). In addition, because the detected displacement depends on internal degrees of freedom of the probe rather than on total beam power, the scheme is insensitive to laser intensity noise; computing Allan standard deviations for both readouts, they find the IWM scheme improves detection stability by one to two orders of magnitude over the conventional one.

Load-bearing premise

The claimed one-to-two order stability improvement assumes the conventional and IWM readouts were compared under matched conditions—same probe laser power, detection bandwidth, magnetic shielding, and averaging time—since the abstract does not describe the comparison protocol.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • SERF magnetometers using IWM readout can reach sub-200 fT/Hz^(1/2) sensitivity, placing them in the class needed for biomagnetic and precision-physics measurements.
  • Allan-deviation stability improves by one to two orders of magnitude over conventional optical readout, meaning longer averaging times remain useful for detecting steady or slowly varying fields.
  • Because the signal rides on the beam's internal polarization state, the readout rejects common-mode laser intensity fluctuations without extra stabilization hardware.
  • The amplification factor grows as the coupling weakens, so the same post-selection geometry can be tuned to trade signal size against measurement range.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the robustness claim holds, the same spatial-mode-as-pointer, polarization-as-system construction could be transferred to other atomic sensors, such as spin comagnetometers or nuclear magnetic resonance detectors, wherever a polarization rotation carries the signal.
  • A direct test of the mechanism would vary the coupling strength and check that the displacement amplification follows the predicted inverse proportionality; if instead the gain saturates, the model would need revision.
  • The stability comparison's strength depends on the two readouts being run under identical laser power, bandwidth, and averaging conditions; matching those is a natural experimental protocol to spell out in a follow-up.
  • One could also combine IWM with balanced detection to see whether the power-noise rejection persists when the post-selection loss is included in the noise budget.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper as submitted claims an optical detection system for a spin-exchange relaxation-free (SERF) magnetometer based on inverse weak measurement (IWM), stating that a magnetic field sensitivity of 182.8 fT/Hz^(1/2) is achieved and that the IWM readout improves Allan-deviation stability by one to two orders of magnitude over a conventional readout. The full text supplied with the submission, however, is arXiv:2508.12309, a JHEP paper on long-lived particles in the Type-I Two-Higgs-Doublet Model; it contains no SERF magnetometer, no weak-measurement formalism, no probe-displacement response curve, no noise model, and no Allan-deviation comparison. The abstract therefore carries the entire scientific claim, and none of its load-bearing components can be checked from the submitted material.

Significance. If the reported result held, it would be a potentially useful contribution to quantum precision measurement: an inverse weak measurement readout reaching sub-200 fT/√Hz sensitivity with improved low-frequency stability would be of interest to the atomic magnetometry community. The claimed amplification mechanism and the robustness to laser power fluctuations are also conceptually appealing. However, as submitted, the manuscript provides no derivational, numerical, or experimental basis for these claims, so the significance cannot currently be assessed beyond the level of an abstract.

major comments (4)
  1. [Full text (mismatched manuscript)] The body of arXiv:2508.12306 as supplied is arXiv:2508.12309, a hep-ph paper on complete light long-lived particle searches in Type-I 2HDM; it contains no SERF magnetometer, no weak-measurement formalism, no probe-displacement response curve, no noise model, and no Allan-deviation comparison. Every load-bearing component of the abstract's claims — the amplification law, the quoted sensitivity number, and the stability improvement — is therefore unauditable from the submission.
  2. [Abstract (sensitivity claim)] The sensitivity number 182.8 fT/Hz^(1/2) is presented without an uncertainty, a measurement protocol, a noise budget, or a statement of whether the effective coupling between the probe spatial mode and the polarization was tuned to maximize the reported value; as a result the number cannot be reproduced or falsified from the supplied material.
  3. [Abstract (stability claim)] The claimed one-to-two order-of-magnitude improvement in Allan deviation is not accompanied by a description of the comparison protocol; the abstract does not state whether the conventional and IWM readouts were measured under matched probe laser power, detection bandwidth, magnetic shielding, and averaging time, so the improvement may reflect differing measurement conditions rather than an intrinsic property of the IWM readout.
  4. [Abstract (amplification mechanism)] The central assertion that the amplification factor is inversely proportional to the coupling strength is stated without derivation or supporting reference in the submission; since the full text is mismatched, even this central formula cannot be verified.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract typesets the sensitivity unit as "fT/Hz1/2"; it should be fT/Hz^(1/2) or fT/√Hz.
  2. [Abstract] The term "Allan standard deviation" is unconventional; the standard term in metrology is "Allan deviation."
  3. [General] The submission contains no references to the weak-measurement literature or to SERF magnetometry, so the novelty claim cannot be situated relative to prior work.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity is demonstrable: the supplied full text is arXiv:2508.12309 (a Type-I 2HDM paper), so the magnetometer abstract has no equations, data, or derivation chain against which a circular reduction could be shown.

full rationale

The abstract claims an IWM-based SERF readout with amplification factor inversely proportional to the coupling strength, a maximum-sensitivity point of 182.8 fT/Hz^(1/2), and a one-to-two-order Allan-deviation improvement. The body supplied under arXiv:2508.12306 is actually arXiv:2508.12309, 'Complete Light Long-Lived Particles searches in Type-I 2HDM,' which contains no SERF magnetometer, no weak-measurement formalism, no probe-displacement response curve, no noise model, and no Allan-deviation comparison. Circularity requires exhibiting a specific reduction: a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, an ansatz smuggled in via self-citation, or an equation identical by construction to its input. None of those reductions can be exhibited from the provided material. The absence of the actual manuscript is a completeness and verifiability failure, not evidence of circularity; under the hard rules, I do not manufacture circularity from unavailability or from the reader's uncertainty about comparison conditions. The analysis therefore finds no circular step in the auditable record. Score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No equations or data are available in the supplied submission, so the ledger contains only the assumptions explicitly stated in the abstract. No new physical entities are introduced by the visible text.

free parameters (1)
  • effective coupling strength between probe spatial mode and polarization = not reported in abstract
    The claimed amplification is inversely proportional to this coupling; the operating point of maximum sensitivity is selected from the measured response curve, so the coupling choice directly sets the reported sensitivity.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Inverse weak measurement formalism (displacement amplification inversely proportional to coupling strength) is applicable to the SERF probe laser readout.
    Abstract: 'the ultra-small magnetic field is significantly amplified with the amplification factor inversely proportional to the coupling strength'; no derivation is shown.
  • domain assumption The spatial pattern of the probe laser is weakly coupled to its polarization, and the polarization is sensitive to external magnetic fields.
    Abstract states this precisely as the model premise for the proposed detection system.
  • domain assumption The SERF magnetometer operates in the standard spin-exchange relaxation-free regime, and the conventional detection baseline is comparable.
    The abstract uses SERF as an established operating mode but gives no setup details or comparison conditions for the Allan deviation improvement.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Inverse Weak measurement in SERF magnetometer." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7KDBP4WF

@misc{pith2026250812306,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Inverse Weak measurement in SERF magnetometer},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7KDBP4WF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.12306}
}
read the original abstract

Weak measurement techniques have been extensively applied in the field of quantum precision measurement to detect ultra-small signals due to the amplification effect. In this work, we propose an optical detection system for a spin-exchange relaxation-free (SERF) magnetometer based on the inverse weak measurement (IWM) framework. By using the spatial pattern of a probe laser as the measurement pointer, we successfully detect ultra-weak magnetic fields. In our model, the spatial pattern of the probe laser is weakly coupled to its polarization, which is sensitive to external magnetic fields. Through post-selection on the optical polarization, the ultra-small magnetic field is significantly amplified with the amplification factor inversely proportional to the coupling strength, as reflected in the measured displacement of the final spatial pattern. By analysing the response curve of the probe laser displacement to the magnetic field, we identify the point of maximum sensitivity, achieving a magnetic field sensitivity of 182.8 fT/Hz1/2. Furthermore, in the IWM scheme, the detected signals depend only on the internal degrees of freedom of the probe laser, making the system robust against the fluctuations in laser power. To demonstrate this advantage, we compute the Allan standard deviation of the output signals for both conventional and IWM detection methods. The results indicate that the IWM-based method improves stability of detection by one to two orders of magnitude. This work presents a novel detection approach that integrates weak measurement techniques, offering a significant enhancement in the performance of SERF magnetometers.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

152 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    When there is a light BSM scalar, S can impose the dominant constraint on mH� , which is different to cases where only heavy BSM Higgs are involved

    We summarized and compared the global fit results of the oblique parameters S, T , and U obtained from Z-pole precision measurements between 2018 and 2024. When there is a light BSM scalar, S can impose the dominant constraint on mH� , which is different to cases where only heavy BSM Higgs are involved. While S with the 2018 data provides an dominant uppe...

  2. [2]

    Under the approx- imation λv2 = 0 and large tan β, the allowed regions are: For lightH: cos(β−α)≃ 1 tanβ, m A∈ (54, 600) GeV, m H� ∼mA

    Under theoretical and experimental constraints, we presented the parameter space in the Type-I 2HDM that accommodates light long-lived scalars H/A. Under the approx- imation λv2 = 0 and large tan β, the allowed regions are: For lightH: cos(β−α)≃ 1 tanβ, m A∈ (54, 600) GeV, m H� ∼mA. For lightA: cos(β−α)≃ 1 tanβ 2m2 H−m2 h m2 H−m2 h , m H∈ (54,mh) GeV, m H...

  3. [3]

    We further presented the potential reach of FASER and FASER 2 in these regions, which enables probing the parameter space at large tan β

    Based on benchmark scenarios accommodating long-lived scalars H/A, we explained the CDF-II precision measurement of mW . We further presented the potential reach of FASER and FASER 2 in these regions, which enables probing the parameter space at large tan β. For the light H scenario, we selected two benchmark points and found that a heavier mH� enhances t...

  4. [4]

    Aad et al., Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC , Phys

    ����� Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC , Phys. Lett. B ��� (2012) 1–29, [arXiv:1207.7214]

  5. [5]

    Chatrchyan et al., Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC , Phys

    ��� Collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC , Phys. Lett. B ��� (2012) 30–61, [ arXiv:1207.7235]. – 29 – ����� H ����� ����� A ����� mA (mH� )min (mH� )max mH (mH� )min (mH� )max 54 80.0 80.5 54 80.0 80.5 75 80.0 103.6 60 80.0 86.2 100 80.0 130.8 63 80.0 89.5 125 100.4 154.3 6...

  6. [6]

    Crivellin and B

    A. Crivellin and B. Mellado, Anomalies in particle physics and their implications for physics beyond the standard model , Nature Rev. Phys. � (2024), no. 5 294–309, [ arXiv:2309.03870]

  7. [7]

    Bertone, D

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk, Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rept. ��� (2005) 279–390, [ hep-ph/0404175]

  8. [8]

    A. G. Cohen, D. B. Kaplan, and A. E. Nelson, Progress in electroweak baryogenesis, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. �� (1993) 27–70, [ hep-ph/9302210]. – 30 – ������ �� . The total decay width (left y-axis) and decay lengthcτ (righty-axis) of the light CP-even Higgs in the Type-I 2HDM for the light H scenario. ������ �� . The total decay width (left y-axis) and...

Show all 152 references
  1. [9]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. D �� (1977) 1791–1797

  2. [10]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons , Phys. Rev. Lett. �� (1977) 1440–1443

  3. [11]

    Aaltonen et al., High-precision measurement of the W boson mass with the CDF II detector , Science ��� (2022), no

    ��� Collaboration, T. Aaltonen et al., High-precision measurement of the W boson mass with the CDF II detector , Science ��� (2022), no. 6589 170–176

  4. [12]

    Abi et al., Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.46 ppm , Phys

    ���� ��� Collaboration, B. Abi et al., Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.46 ppm , Phys. Rev. Lett. ��� (2021), no. 14 141801, [arXiv:2104.03281]

  5. [13]

    Aaij et al., Test of lepton universality in beauty-quark decays , Nature – 31 – Phys

    ���� Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Test of lepton universality in beauty-quark decays , Nature – 31 – Phys. �� (2022), no. 3 277–282, [ arXiv:2103.11769]. [Addendum: Nature Phys. 19, (2023)]

  6. [14]

    ��� Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Search for long-lived particles decaying to jets with displaced vertices in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D ��� (2021), no. 5 052011, [arXiv:2104.13474]

  7. [15]

    Tumasyan et al., Search for long-lived particles decaying to leptons with large impact parameter in proton–proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, Eur

    ��� Collaboration, A. Tumasyan et al., Search for long-lived particles decaying to leptons with large impact parameter in proton–proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C �� (2022), no. 2 153, [ arXiv:2110.04809]

  8. [16]

    ��� Collaboration, A. Tumasyan et al., Search for long-lived particles decaying into muon pairs in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV collected with a dedicated high-rate data stream, JHEP �� (2022) 062, [ arXiv:2112.13769]

  9. [17]

    Tumasyan et al., Search for long-lived heavy neutral leptons with displaced vertices in proton-proton collisions at √s =13 TeV, JHEP �� (2022) 081, [arXiv:2201.05578]

    ��� Collaboration, A. Tumasyan et al., Search for long-lived heavy neutral leptons with displaced vertices in proton-proton collisions at √s =13 TeV, JHEP �� (2022) 081, [arXiv:2201.05578]

  10. [18]

    ����� Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for events with a pair of displaced vertices from long-lived neutral particles decaying into hadronic jets in the ATLAS muon spectrometer in pp collisions at√s=13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D ��� (2022), no. 3 032005, [ arXiv:2203.00587]

  11. [19]

    ����� Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for heavy, long-lived, charged particles with large ionisation energy loss in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV using the ATLAS experiment and the full Run 2 dataset , JHEP ���� (2023) 158, [ arXiv:2205.06013]

  12. [20]

    Tumasyan et al., Search for long-lived particles decaying to a pair of muons in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, JHEP �� (2023) 228, [arXiv:2205.08582]

    ��� Collaboration, A. Tumasyan et al., Search for long-lived particles decaying to a pair of muons in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, JHEP �� (2023) 228, [arXiv:2205.08582]

  13. [21]

    ����� Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for light long-lived neutral particles that decay to collimated pairs of leptons or light hadrons in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP �� (2023) 153, [ arXiv:2206.12181]

  14. [22]

    ����� Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for long-lived, massive particles in events with displaced vertices and multiple jets in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , JHEP �� (2023) 200, [ arXiv:2301.13866]

  15. [23]

    Aad et al., Search for heavy long-lived multi-charged particles in the full LHC Run 2 pp collision data at s=13 TeV using the ATLAS detector , Phys

    ����� Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for heavy long-lived multi-charged particles in the full LHC Run 2 pp collision data at s=13 TeV using the ATLAS detector , Phys. Lett. B ��� (2023) 138316, [ arXiv:2303.13613]

  16. [24]

    Aad et al., Search for light long-lived neutral particles from Higgs boson decays via vector-boson-fusion production from pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur

    ����� Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for light long-lived neutral particles from Higgs boson decays via vector-boson-fusion production from pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C �� (2024), no. 7 719, [ arXiv:2311.18298]

  17. [25]

    ��� Collaboration, A. Hayrapetyan et al., Search for Long-Lived Heavy Neutral Leptons with Lepton Flavour Conserving or Violating Decays to a Jet and a Charged Lepton , JHEP �� (2024) 105, [ arXiv:2312.07484]

  18. [26]

    Hayrapetyan et al., Search for long-lived particles decaying in the CMS muon detectors in proton-proton collisions at s=13 TeV , Phys

    ��� Collaboration, A. Hayrapetyan et al., Search for long-lived particles decaying in the CMS muon detectors in proton-proton collisions at s=13 TeV , Phys. Rev. D ��� (2024), no. 3 032007, [arXiv:2402.01898]

  19. [27]

    Hayrapetyan et al., Search for long-lived particles using displaced – 32 – vertices and missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at s=13 TeV , Phys

    ��� Collaboration, A. Hayrapetyan et al., Search for long-lived particles using displaced – 32 – vertices and missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at s=13 TeV , Phys. Rev. D ��� (2024), no. 11 112005, [ arXiv:2402.15804]

  20. [28]

    Hayrapetyan et al., Search for long-lived heavy neutrinos in the decays of B mesons produced in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, JHEP �� (2024) 183, [arXiv:2403.04584]

    ��� Collaboration, A. Hayrapetyan et al., Search for long-lived heavy neutrinos in the decays of B mesons produced in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, JHEP �� (2024) 183, [arXiv:2403.04584]

  21. [29]

    Aad et al., Search for Light Long-Lived Particles in pp Collisions at s=13 TeV Using Displaced Vertices in the ATLAS Inner Detector , Phys

    ����� Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for Light Long-Lived Particles in pp Collisions at s=13 TeV Using Displaced Vertices in the ATLAS Inner Detector , Phys. Rev. Lett. ��� (2024), no. 16 161803, [ arXiv:2403.15332]

  22. [30]

    ����� Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for neutral long-lived particles that decay into displaced jets in the ATLAS calorimeter in association with leptons or jets using pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV , JHEP �� (2024) 036, [ arXiv:2407.09183]

  23. [31]

    ��� Collaboration, A. Hayrapetyan et al., Search for heavy long-lived charged particles with large ionization energy loss in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, JHEP �� (2025) 109, [arXiv:2410.09164]

  24. [32]

    ����� Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for long-lived charged particles using large specific ionisation loss and time of flight in 140 fb � � of pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, arXiv:2502.06694

  25. [33]

    Chekhovsky et al., Search for vector-like leptons with long-lived particle decays in the CMS muon system in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, arXiv:2503.16699

    ��� Collaboration, V. Chekhovsky et al., Search for vector-like leptons with long-lived particle decays in the CMS muon system in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, arXiv:2503.16699

  26. [34]

    ����� Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for events with one displaced vertex from long-lived neutral particles decaying into hadronic jets in the ATLAS muon spectrometer in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV, arXiv:2503.20445

  27. [35]

    Bauer, O

    M. Bauer, O. Brandt, L. Lee, and C. Ohm, ANUBIS: Proposal to search for long-lived neutral particles in CERN service shafts , arXiv:1909.13022

  28. [36]

    Hirsch and Z

    M. Hirsch and Z. S. Wang, Heavy neutral leptons at ANUBIS , Phys. Rev. D ��� (2020), no. 5 055034, [arXiv:2001.04750]

  29. [37]

    H. K. Dreiner, J. Y. G¨ unther, and Z. S. Wang,R-parity violation and light neutralinos at ANUBIS and MAPP , Phys. Rev. D ��� (2021), no. 7 075013, [ arXiv:2008.07539]

  30. [38]

    V. V. Gligorov, S. Knapen, M. Papucci, and D. J. Robinson, Searching for Long-lived Particles: A Compact Detector for Exotics at LHCb , Phys. Rev. D �� (2018), no. 1 015023, [arXiv:1708.09395]

  31. [39]

    B. Dey, J. Lee, V. Coco, and C.-S. Moon, Background studies for the CODEX-b experiment: measurements and simulation, arXiv:1912.03846

  32. [40]

    Aielli et al., Expression of interest for the CODEX-b detector , Eur

    ������� Collaboration, G. Aielli et al., Expression of interest for the CODEX-b detector , Eur. Phys. J. C �� (2020), no. 12 1177, [ arXiv:1911.00481]

  33. [41]

    Aielli et al., The Road Ahead for CODEX-b , arXiv:2203.07316

    G. Aielli et al., The Road Ahead for CODEX-b , arXiv:2203.07316

  34. [42]

    J. L. Feng, I. Galon, F. Kling, and S. Trojanowski, ForwArd Search ExpeRiment at the LHC , Phys. Rev. D �� (2018), no. 3 035001, [ arXiv:1708.09389]. – 33 –

  35. [43]

    Ariga et al., FASER’s physics reach for long-lived particles , Phys

    � ���� Collaboration, A. Ariga et al., FASER’s physics reach for long-lived particles , Phys. Rev. D �� (2019), no. 9 095011, [ arXiv:1811.12522]

  36. [44]

    Kling and S

    F. Kling and S. Trojanowski, Forward experiment sensitivity estimator for the LHC and future hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D ��� (2021), no. 3 035012, [ arXiv:2105.07077]

  37. [45]

    Abreu et al., Search for dark photons with the FASER detector at the LHC, Phys

    � ���� Collaboration, H. Abreu et al., Search for dark photons with the FASER detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B ��� (2024) 138378, [ arXiv:2308.05587]

  38. [46]

    � ���� Collaboration, R. Mammen Abraham et al., Shining light on the dark sector: search for axion-like particles and other new physics in photonic final states with FASER , JHEP �� (2025) 199, [ arXiv:2410.10363]

  39. [47]

    Alimena et al., Searching for long-lived particles beyond the Standard Model at the Large Hadron Collider, J

    J. Alimena et al., Searching for long-lived particles beyond the Standard Model at the Large Hadron Collider, J. Phys. G �� (2020), no. 9 090501, [ arXiv:1903.04497]

  40. [48]

    Bose et al., Report of the Topical Group on Physics Beyond the Standard Model at Energy Frontier for Snowmass 2021 , arXiv:2209.13128

    T. Bose et al., Report of the Topical Group on Physics Beyond the Standard Model at Energy Frontier for Snowmass 2021 , arXiv:2209.13128

  41. [49]

    J. P. Chou, D. Curtin, and H. J. Lubatti, New Detectors to Explore the Lifetime Frontier , Phys. Lett. B ��� (2017) 29–36, [ arXiv:1606.06298]

  42. [50]

    Curtin and M

    D. Curtin and M. E. Peskin, Analysis of Long Lived Particle Decays with the MATHUSLA Detector, Phys. Rev. D �� (2018), no. 1 015006, [ arXiv:1705.06327]

  43. [51]

    J. A. Evans, Detecting Hidden Particles with MATHUSLA , Phys. Rev. D �� (2018), no. 5 055046, [arXiv:1708.08503]

  44. [52]

    Curtin et al., Long-Lived Particles at the Energy Frontier: The MATHUSLA Physics Case , Rept

    D. Curtin et al., Long-Lived Particles at the Energy Frontier: The MATHUSLA Physics Case , Rept. Prog. Phys. �� (2019), no. 11 116201, [ arXiv:1806.07396]

  45. [53]

    Curtin, K

    D. Curtin, K. R. Dienes, and B. Thomas, Dynamical Dark Matter, MATHUSLA, and the Lifetime Frontier, Phys. Rev. D �� (2018), no. 11 115005, [ arXiv:1809.11021]

  46. [54]

    Berlin and F

    A. Berlin and F. Kling, Inelastic Dark Matter at the LHC Lifetime Frontier: ATLAS, CMS, LHCb, CODEX-b, FASER, and MATHUSLA , Phys. Rev. D �� (2019), no. 1 015021, [arXiv:1810.01879]

  47. [55]

    Alpigiani et al., A Letter of Intent for MATHUSLA: A Dedicated Displaced Vertex Detector above ATLAS or CMS

    �������� Collaboration, C. Alpigiani et al., A Letter of Intent for MATHUSLA: A Dedicated Displaced Vertex Detector above ATLAS or CMS. , arXiv:1811.00927

  48. [56]

    Lubatti et al., Explore the lifetime frontier with MATHUSLA, JINST �� (2020), no

    �������� Collaboration, H. Lubatti et al., Explore the lifetime frontier with MATHUSLA, JINST �� (2020), no. 06 C06026, [ arXiv:1901.04040]

  49. [57]

    Jod lowski, F

    K. Jod lowski, F. Kling, L. Roszkowski, and S. Trojanowski, Extending the reach of FASER, MATHUSLA, and SHiP towards smaller lifetimes using secondary particle production , Phys. Rev. D ��� (2020), no. 9 095020, [ arXiv:1911.11346]

  50. [58]

    Alidra et al., The MATHUSLA test stand , Nucl

    M. Alidra et al., The MATHUSLA test stand , Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A ��� (2021) 164661, [arXiv:2005.02018]

  51. [59]

    Alpigiani et al., An Update to the Letter of Intent for MATHUSLA: Search for Long-Lived Particles at the HL-LHC , arXiv:2009.01693

    �������� Collaboration, C. Alpigiani et al., An Update to the Letter of Intent for MATHUSLA: Search for Long-Lived Particles at the HL-LHC , arXiv:2009.01693

  52. [60]

    Alpigiani et al., Recent Progress and Next Steps for the MATHUSLA LLP Detector, in Snowmass 2021, 3, 2022

    �������� Collaboration, C. Alpigiani et al., Recent Progress and Next Steps for the MATHUSLA LLP Detector, in Snowmass 2021, 3, 2022. arXiv:2203.08126. – 34 –

  53. [61]

    Bonivento et al., Proposal to Search for Heavy Neutral Leptons at the SPS , arXiv:1310.1762

    W. Bonivento et al., Proposal to Search for Heavy Neutral Leptons at the SPS , arXiv:1310.1762

  54. [62]

    Alekhin et al., A facility to Search for Hidden Particles at the CERN SPS: the SHiP physics case, Rept

    S. Alekhin et al., A facility to Search for Hidden Particles at the CERN SPS: the SHiP physics case, Rept. Prog. Phys. �� (2016), no. 12 124201, [ arXiv:1504.04855]

  55. [63]

    Anelli et al., A facility to Search for Hidden Particles (SHiP) at the CERN SPS, arXiv:1504.04956

    ���� Collaboration, M. Anelli et al., A facility to Search for Hidden Particles (SHiP) at the CERN SPS, arXiv:1504.04956

  56. [64]

    Kling, S

    F. Kling, S. Li, H. Song, S. Su, and W. Su, Light Scalars at FASER , JHEP �� (2023) 001, [arXiv:2212.06186]

  57. [65]

    Tumasyan et al., Search for exotic Higgs boson decays H→AA→ 4γ with events containing two merged diphotons in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, Phys

    ��� Collaboration, A. Tumasyan et al., Search for exotic Higgs boson decays H→AA→ 4γ with events containing two merged diphotons in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. ��� (2023) 101801, [ arXiv:2209.06197]

  58. [66]

    Chekhovsky et al., High-precision measurement of the W boson mass with the CMS experiment at the LHC , arXiv:2412.13872

    ��� Collaboration, V. Chekhovsky et al., High-precision measurement of the W boson mass with the CMS experiment at the LHC , arXiv:2412.13872

  59. [67]

    Aad et al., Measurement of the W-boson mass and width with the ATLAS detector using proton–proton collisions at √s = 7 TeV, Eur

    ����� Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Measurement of the W-boson mass and width with the ATLAS detector using proton–proton collisions at √s = 7 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C �� (2024), no. 12 1309, [ arXiv:2403.15085]

  60. [68]

    Kling, S

    F. Kling, S. Su, and W. Su, 2HDM Neutral Scalars under the LHC , JHEP �� (2020) 163, [arXiv:2004.04172]

  61. [69]

    J. F. Gunion and H. E. Haber, The CP conserving two Higgs doublet model: The Approach to the decoupling limit, Phys. Rev. D �� (2003) 075019, [ hep-ph/0207010]

  62. [70]

    I. F. Ginzburg and I. P. Ivanov, Tree-level unitarity constraints in the most general 2HDM , Phys. Rev. D �� (2005) 115010, [ hep-ph/0508020]

  63. [71]

    Kling, J

    F. Kling, J. M. No, and S. Su, Anatomy of Exotic Higgs Decays in 2HDM , JHEP �� (2016) 093, [arXiv:1604.01406]

  64. [72]

    J. Gu, H. Li, Z. Liu, S. Su, and W. Su, Learning from Higgs Physics at Future Higgs Factories , JHEP �� (2017) 153, [ arXiv:1709.06103]

  65. [73]

    Abbiendi et al., Search for Charged Higgs bosons: Combined Results Using LEP Data , Eur

    ������ ������� ��� ����� ��� Collaboration, G. Abbiendi et al., Search for Charged Higgs bosons: Combined Results Using LEP Data , Eur. Phys. J. C �� (2013) 2463, [arXiv:1301.6065]

  66. [74]

    Schael et al., Search for neutral MSSM Higgs bosons at LEP , Eur

    ������ ������� ��� ����� ��� ������� ����� ��� ����� ����� �������� Collaboration, S. Schael et al., Search for neutral MSSM Higgs bosons at LEP , Eur. Phys. J. C �� (2006) 547–587, [ hep-ex/0602042]

  67. [75]

    ��� Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Search for MSSM Higgs bosons decaying to µ + µ − in proton-proton collisions at s=13TeV , Phys. Lett. B ��� (2019) 134992, [arXiv:1907.03152]

  68. [76]

    ����� Collaboration, M. Aaboud et al., Search for scalar resonances decaying into µ�µ� in events with and without b-tagged jets produced in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP �� (2019) 117, [ arXiv:1901.08144]

  69. [77]

    ��� Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Search for beyond the standard model Higgs bosons – 35 – decaying into a bb pair in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV, JHEP �� (2018) 113, [arXiv:1805.12191]

  70. [78]

    Chekhovsky et al., Search for bosons of an extended Higgs sector in b quark final states in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV , JHEP �� (2025) 144, [arXiv:2502.06568]

    ��� Collaboration, V. Chekhovsky et al., Search for bosons of an extended Higgs sector in b quark final states in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV , JHEP �� (2025) 144, [arXiv:2502.06568]

  71. [79]

    Aad et al., Search for heavy neutral Higgs bosons produced in association with b-quarks and decaying into b-quarks at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys

    ����� Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for heavy neutral Higgs bosons produced in association with b-quarks and decaying into b-quarks at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D ��� (2020), no. 3 032004, [ arXiv:1907.02749]

  72. [80]

    ��� Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Search for additional neutral MSSM Higgs bosons in the ττ final state in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, JHEP �� (2018) 007, [arXiv:1803.06553]

  73. [81]

    ��� Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Search for a low-mass τ �τ � resonance in association with a bottom quark in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, JHEP �� (2019) 210, [arXiv:1903.10228]

  74. [82]

    Aad et al., Search for heavy Higgs bosons decaying into two tau leptons with the ATLAS detector using pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV, Phys

    ����� Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for heavy Higgs bosons decaying into two tau leptons with the ATLAS detector using pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. ��� (2020), no. 5 051801, [ arXiv:2002.12223]

  75. [83]

    Aad et al., Search for Scalar Diphoton Resonances in the Mass Range 65− 600 GeV with the ATLAS Detector in pp Collision Data at √s = 8 TeV , Phys

    ����� Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for Scalar Diphoton Resonances in the Mass Range 65− 600 GeV with the ATLAS Detector in pp Collision Data at √s = 8 TeV , Phys. Rev. Lett. ��� (2014), no. 17 171801, [ arXiv:1407.6583]

  76. [84]

    Aad et al., Search for diphoton resonances in the 66 to 110 GeV mass range using pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , JHEP �� (2025) 053, [arXiv:2407.07546]

    ����� Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for diphoton resonances in the 66 to 110 GeV mass range using pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , JHEP �� (2025) 053, [arXiv:2407.07546]

  77. [85]

    ��� Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Search for a standard model-like Higgs boson in the mass range between 70 and 110 GeV in the diphoton final state in proton-proton collisions at√s = 8 and 13 TeV , Phys. Lett. B ��� (2019) 320–347, [ arXiv:1811.08459]

  78. [86]

    Hayrapetyan et al., Search for new physics in high-mass diphoton events from proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV , JHEP �� (2024) 215, [arXiv:2405.09320]

    ��� Collaboration, A. Hayrapetyan et al., Search for new physics in high-mass diphoton events from proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV , JHEP �� (2024) 215, [arXiv:2405.09320]

  79. [87]

    ��� Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Search for heavy Higgs bosons decaying to a top quark pair in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, JHEP �� (2020) 171, [arXiv:1908.01115]. [Erratum: JHEP 03, 187 (2022)]

  80. [88]

    ��� Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Search for a new scalar resonance decaying to a pair of Z bosons in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, JHEP �� (2018) 127, [arXiv:1804.01939]. [Erratum: JHEP 03, 128 (2019)]

  81. [89]

    Aaboud et al., Search for heavy ZZ resonances in the ℓ�ℓ�ℓ�ℓ� and ℓ�ℓ�ν¯ν final states using proton–proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur

    ����� Collaboration, M. Aaboud et al., Search for heavy ZZ resonances in the ℓ�ℓ�ℓ�ℓ� and ℓ�ℓ�ν¯ν final states using proton–proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C �� (2018), no. 4 293, [ arXiv:1712.06386]

  82. [90]

    Aaboud et al., Search for heavy resonances decaying into WW in the eνµν final state in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , Eur

    ����� Collaboration, M. Aaboud et al., Search for heavy resonances decaying into WW in the eνµν final state in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , Eur. Phys. J. C �� (2018), no. 1 24, [ arXiv:1710.01123]. – 36 –

  83. [91]

    ��� Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Search for a heavy Higgs boson decaying to a pair of W bosons in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, JHEP �� (2020) 034, [arXiv:1912.01594]

  84. [92]

    ��� Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Search for Higgs boson pair production in the bbττ final state in proton-proton collisions at � (s) = 8 TeV, Phys. Rev. D �� (2017), no. 7 072004, [arXiv:1707.00350]

  85. [93]

    ��� Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Combination of searches for Higgs boson pair production in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. ��� (2019), no. 12 121803, [arXiv:1811.09689]

  86. [94]

    Aad et al., Searches for Higgs boson pair production in the hh→bbττ,γγWW �,γγbb,bbbb channels with the ATLAS detector , Phys

    ����� Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Searches for Higgs boson pair production in the hh→bbττ,γγWW �,γγbb,bbbb channels with the ATLAS detector , Phys. Rev. D �� (2015) 092004, [arXiv:1509.04670]

  87. [95]

    Aad et al., Combination of Searches for Higgs Boson Pair Production in pp Collisions at s=13 TeV with the ATLAS Detector , Phys

    ����� Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Combination of Searches for Higgs Boson Pair Production in pp Collisions at s=13 TeV with the ATLAS Detector , Phys. Rev. Lett. ��� (2024), no. 10 101801, [ arXiv:2406.09971]

  88. [96]

    Khachatryan et al., Search for a pseudoscalar boson decaying into a Z boson and the 125 GeV Higgs boson in llbb final states , Phys

    ��� Collaboration, V. Khachatryan et al., Search for a pseudoscalar boson decaying into a Z boson and the 125 GeV Higgs boson in llbb final states , Phys. Lett. B ��� (2015) 221–243, [arXiv:1504.04710]

  89. [97]

    ��� Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Search for a heavy pseudoscalar boson decaying to a Z and a Higgs boson at √s = 13 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C �� (2019), no. 7 564, [arXiv:1903.00941]

  90. [98]

    Aad et al., Search for a CP-odd Higgs boson decaying to Zh in pp collisions at√s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector , Phys

    ����� Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for a CP-odd Higgs boson decaying to Zh in pp collisions at√s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector , Phys. Lett. B ��� (2015) 163–183, [arXiv:1502.04478]

  91. [99]

    ����� Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for heavy resonances decaying into a Z or W boson and a Higgs boson in final states with leptons and b-jets in 139 fb� � of pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , JHEP �� (2023) 016, [ arXiv:2207.00230]

  92. [100]

    ��� Collaboration, V. Khachatryan et al., Searches for a heavy scalar boson H decaying to a pair of 125 GeV Higgs bosons hh or for a heavy pseudoscalar boson A decaying to Zh, in the final states with h→ττ , Phys. Lett. B ��� (2016) 217–244, [ arXiv:1510.01181]

  93. [101]

    ��� Collaboration, V. Chekhovsky et al., Search for a heavy pseudoscalar Higgs boson decaying to a 125 GeV Higgs boson and a Z boson in final states with two tau and two light leptons in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, arXiv:2501.14825

  94. [102]

    ����� Collaboration, M. Aaboud et al., Search for a heavy Higgs boson decaying into a Z boson and another heavy Higgs boson in the ℓℓbb final state in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , Phys. Lett. B ��� (2018) 392–414, [ arXiv:1804.01126]

  95. [103]

    ��� Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Search for new neutral Higgs bosons through the H→ ZA→ℓ�ℓ� b¯b process in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV, JHEP �� (2020) 055, [arXiv:1911.03781]

  96. [104]

    ����� Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for a heavy Higgs boson decaying into a Z boson – 37 – and another heavy Higgs boson in the ℓℓbb and ℓℓWW final states in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , Eur. Phys. J. C �� (2021), no. 5 396, [ arXiv:2011.05639]

  97. [105]

    Khachatryan et al., Search for neutral resonances decaying into a Z boson and a pair of b jets or τ leptons, Phys

    ��� Collaboration, V. Khachatryan et al., Search for neutral resonances decaying into a Z boson and a pair of b jets or τ leptons, Phys. Lett. B ��� (2016) 369–394, [arXiv:1603.02991]

  98. [106]

    W. Su, A. G. Williams, and M. Zhang, Strong first order electroweak phase transition in 2HDM confronting future Z & Higgs factories , JHEP �� (2021) 219, [ arXiv:2011.04540]

  99. [107]

    J. Li, H. Song, S. Su, and W. Su, Charged Higgs search in 2HDM , JHEP �� (2025) 063, [arXiv:2412.04572]

  100. [108]

    Atkinson, M

    O. Atkinson, M. Black, A. Lenz, A. Rusov, and J. Wynne, Cornering the Two Higgs Doublet Model Type II, JHEP �� (2022) 172, [ arXiv:2107.05650]

  101. [109]

    Misiak, A

    M. Misiak, A. Rehman, and M. Steinhauser, TowardsB→Xsγ at the NNLO in QCD without interpolation in mc, JHEP �� (2020) 175, [ arXiv:2002.01548]

  102. [110]

    Bergsma et al., Search for Axion Like Particle Production in 400-GeV Proton - Copper Interactions , Phys

    ����� Collaboration, F. Bergsma et al., Search for Axion Like Particle Production in 400-GeV Proton - Copper Interactions , Phys. Lett. B ��� (1985) 458–462

  103. [111]

    M. W. Winkler, Decay and detection of a light scalar boson mixing with the Higgs boson , Phys. Rev. D �� (2019), no. 1 015018, [ arXiv:1809.01876]

  104. [112]

    Gorbunov, I

    D. Gorbunov, I. Krasnov, and S. Suvorov, Constraints on light scalars from PS191 results , Phys. Lett. B ��� (2021) 136524, [ arXiv:2105.11102]

  105. [113]

    M. S. Turner, Axions from SN 1987a , Phys. Rev. Lett. �� (1988) 1797

  106. [114]

    J. R. Ellis and K. A. Olive, Constraints on Light Particles From Supernova Sn1987a , Phys. Lett. B ��� (1987) 525

  107. [115]

    Krnjaic, Probing Light Thermal Dark-Matter With a Higgs Portal Mediator , Phys

    G. Krnjaic, Probing Light Thermal Dark-Matter With a Higgs Portal Mediator , Phys. Rev. D �� (2016), no. 7 073009, [ arXiv:1512.04119]

  108. [116]

    Batell, J

    B. Batell, J. Berger, and A. Ismail, Probing the Higgs Portal at the Fermilab Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments, Phys. Rev. D ��� (2019), no. 11 115039, [ arXiv:1909.11670]

  109. [117]

    P. S. B. Dev, R. N. Mohapatra, and Y. Zhang, Revisiting supernova constraints on a light CP-even scalar, JCAP �� (2020) 003, [ arXiv:2005.00490]. [Erratum: JCAP 11, E01 (2020)]

  110. [118]

    Balaji, P

    S. Balaji, P. S. B. Dev, J. Silk, and Y. Zhang, Improved stellar limits on a light CP-even scalar, JCAP �� (2022) 024, [ arXiv:2205.01669]

  111. [119]

    Aaij et al., Search for hidden-sector bosons in B�→K��µ�µ� decays, Phys

    ���� Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Search for hidden-sector bosons in B�→K��µ�µ� decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. ��� (2015), no. 16 161802, [ arXiv:1508.04094]

  112. [120]

    Aaij et al., Search for long-lived scalar particles in B� →K�χ(µ�µ� ) decays, Phys

    ���� Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Search for long-lived scalar particles in B� →K�χ(µ�µ� ) decays, Phys. Rev. D �� (2017), no. 7 071101, [ arXiv:1612.07818]

  113. [121]

    ����� Collaboration, J. P. Lees et al., Search for B→K���νν and invisible quarkonium decays, Phys. Rev. D �� (2013), no. 11 112005, [ arXiv:1303.7465]

  114. [122]

    Cortina Gil et al., Measurement of the very rare K � →π�νν decay, JHEP �� (2021) 093, [ arXiv:2103.15389]

    ���� Collaboration, E. Cortina Gil et al., Measurement of the very rare K � →π�νν decay, JHEP �� (2021) 093, [ arXiv:2103.15389]. – 38 –

  115. [123]

    Abratenko et al., Search for a Higgs Portal Scalar Decaying to Electron-Positron Pairs in the MicroBooNE Detector , Phys

    ���������� Collaboration, P. Abratenko et al., Search for a Higgs Portal Scalar Decaying to Electron-Positron Pairs in the MicroBooNE Detector , Phys. Rev. Lett. ��� (2021), no. 15 151803, [arXiv:2106.00568]

  116. [124]

    �������� Collaboration, A. V. Artamonov et al., Study of the decay K� →π�ν¯ν in the momentum region 140<P π < 199 MeV/c, Phys. Rev. D �� (2009) 092004, [arXiv:0903.0030]

  117. [125]

    �������� ���� ����� Collaboration, R. L. Workman et al., Review of Particle Physics , PTEP ���� (2022) 083C01

  118. [126]

    Aaij et al., Searches for 25 rare and forbidden decays of D� and D� s mesons, JHEP �� (2021) 044, [ arXiv:2011.00217]

    ���� Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Searches for 25 rare and forbidden decays of D� and D� s mesons, JHEP �� (2021) 044, [ arXiv:2011.00217]

  119. [127]

    Acciarri et al., Search for neutral Higgs boson production through the process e+ e- –> Z* H0, Phys

    �� Collaboration, M. Acciarri et al., Search for neutral Higgs boson production through the process e+ e- –> Z* H0, Phys. Lett. B ��� (1996) 454–470

  120. [128]

    Buskulic et al., Search for a nonminimal Higgs boson produced in the reaction e�e� → h Z�, Phys

    ����� Collaboration, D. Buskulic et al., Search for a nonminimal Higgs boson produced in the reaction e�e� → h Z�, Phys. Lett. B ��� (1993) 312–325

  121. [129]

    Abbiendi et al., Search for invisibly decaying Higgs bosons in e+ e- —> Z0 h0 production at s**(1/2) = 183-GeV - 209-GeV , Phys

    ���� Collaboration, G. Abbiendi et al., Search for invisibly decaying Higgs bosons in e+ e- —> Z0 h0 production at s**(1/2) = 183-GeV - 209-GeV , Phys. Lett. B ��� (2010) 381–390, [arXiv:0707.0373]

  122. [130]

    J. D. Clarke, R. Foot, and R. R. Volkas, Phenomenology of a very light scalar (100 MeV < mh < 10 GeV) mixing with the SM Higgs , JHEP �� (2014) 123, [ arXiv:1310.8042]

  123. [131]

    Aad et al., Combination of searches for invisible decays of the Higgs boson using 139 fb−1 of proton-proton collision data at s=13 TeV collected with the ATLAS experiment, Phys

    ����� Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Combination of searches for invisible decays of the Higgs boson using 139 fb−1 of proton-proton collision data at s=13 TeV collected with the ATLAS experiment, Phys. Lett. B ��� (2023) 137963, [ arXiv:2301.10731]

  124. [132]

    ��� Collaboration, A. Tumasyan et al., A search for decays of the Higgs boson to invisible particles in events with a top-antitop quark pair or a vector boson in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C �� (2023), no. 10 933, [ arXiv:2303.01214]

  125. [133]

    ����� Collaboration, M. Aaboud et al., Search for the Higgs boson produced in association with a vector boson and decaying into two spin-zero particles in the H→aa→ 4b channel in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , JHEP �� (2018) 031, [arXiv:1806.07355]

  126. [134]

    ��� Collaboration, A. Hayrapetyan et al., Search for the decay of the Higgs boson to a pair of light pseudoscalar bosons in the final state with four bottom quarks in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV , JHEP �� (2024) 097, [ arXiv:2403.10341]

  127. [135]

    ��� Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Search for an exotic decay of the Higgs boson to a pair of light pseudoscalars in the final state with two b quarks and two τ leptons in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B ��� (2018) 462, [ arXiv:1805.10191]

  128. [136]

    ��� Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., A search for pair production of new light bosons decaying into muons in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV , Phys. Lett. B ��� (2019) 131–154, [arXiv:1812.00380]

  129. [137]

    Aad et al., Search for Higgs boson decays into a pair of pseudoscalar particles in the bbµµ final state with the ATLAS detector in pp collisions at√s=13 TeV, Phys

    ����� Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for Higgs boson decays into a pair of pseudoscalar particles in the bbµµ final state with the ATLAS detector in pp collisions at√s=13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D ��� (2022), no. 1 012006, [ arXiv:2110.00313]. – 39 –

  130. [138]

    ��� Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Search for an exotic decay of the Higgs boson to a pair of light pseudoscalars in the final state with two muons and two b quarks in pp collisions at 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B ��� (2019) 398–423, [ arXiv:1812.06359]

  131. [139]

    ��� Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Search for light pseudoscalar boson pairs produced from decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson in final states with two muons and two nearby tracks in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B ��� (2020) 135087, [ arXiv:1907.07235]

  132. [140]

    ��� Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Search for an exotic decay of the Higgs boson to a pair of light pseudoscalars in the final state of two muons and two τ leptons in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV, JHEP �� (2018) 018, [ arXiv:1805.04865]

  133. [141]

    N. Chen, T. Han, S. Su, W. Su, and Y. Wu, Type-II 2HDM under the Precision Measurements at the Z-pole and a Higgs Factory , JHEP �� (2019) 023, [ arXiv:1808.02037]

  134. [142]

    Erler and A

    J. Erler and A. Freitas, Electroweak model and constraints on new physics , pdg.lbl.gov/2020/reviews/rpp2020-rev-standard-model(2020)

  135. [143]

    Erler and A

    J. Erler and A. Freitas, Electroweak model and constraints on new physics , pdg.lbl.gov/2022/reviews/rpp2022-rev-standard-model(2022)

  136. [144]

    Erler and A

    J. Erler and A. Freitas, Electroweak model and constraints on new physics , pdg.lbl.gov/2024/reviews/rpp2024-rev-standard-model(2024)

  137. [145]

    Schael et al., Precision electroweak measurements on the Z resonance, Phys

    ������ ������� ��� ����� ���� ��� ����������� ������� ������ ��� ����������� ������ ��� ����� ������� ����� Collaboration, S. Schael et al., Precision electroweak measurements on the Z resonance, Phys. Rept. ��� (2006) 257–454, [hep-ex/0509008]

  138. [146]

    Erler and A

    J. Erler and A. Freitas, Electroweak model and constraints on new physics , pdg.lbl.gov/2018/reviews/rpp2018-rev-standard-model(2018)

  139. [147]

    H. E. Haber and O. St˚ al,New LHC benchmarks for the CP -conserving two-Higgs-doublet model, Eur. Phys. J. C �� (2015), no. 10 491, [ arXiv:1507.04281]. [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 76, 312 (2016)]

  140. [148]

    Arbey, F

    A. Arbey, F. Mahmoudi, O. Stal, and T. Stefaniak, Status of the Charged Higgs Boson in Two Higgs Doublet Models , Eur. Phys. J. C �� (2018), no. 3 182, [ arXiv:1706.07414]

  141. [149]

    Sirlin and A

    A. Sirlin and A. Ferroglia, Radiative Corrections in Precision Electroweak Physics: a Historical Perspective, Rev. Mod. Phys. �� (2013), no. 1 263–297, [ arXiv:1210.5296]

  142. [150]

    Abreu et al., The FASER detector, JINST �� (2024), no

    � ���� Collaboration, H. Abreu et al., The FASER detector, JINST �� (2024), no. 05 P05066, [arXiv:2207.11427]

  143. [151]

    J. L. Feng et al., The Forward Physics Facility at the High-Luminosity LHC , J. Phys. G �� (2023), no. 3 030501, [ arXiv:2203.05090]

  144. [152]

    Adhikary et al., Scientific program for the Forward Physics Facility , Eur

    J. Adhikary et al., Scientific program for the Forward Physics Facility , Eur. Phys. J. C �� (2025), no. 4 430, [ arXiv:2411.04175]. – 40 –

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.