Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 34 references

Observational Analysis of Multi-thermal Counter-streaming Flows in a Forming Filament and Their Relationship with Local Heating at Filament Footpoints

T0 review · 4 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Counter-streaming solar filament flows are multi-thermal and footpoint-fed

desk verdict The abstract promises a solar-physics analysis of counter-streaming flows in a forming filament, but the attached full text is an unrelated computer-architecture paper, leaving no science to review. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.12737 v1 pith:TXDJE37P submitted 2025-08-18 astro-ph.SR

Hongrui Li , Hechao Chen , Chun Xia , Xiaoli Yan , Yongyuan Xiang , Jincheng Wang This is my paper
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords solarfilamentscounter-streamingflowsmulti-thermalplasmachromosphericheatingfluxemergenceandcancellationtransitionregionspectroscopymicro-turbulence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the ever-present counter-streaming flows inside a forming solar filament are not a single back-and-forth motion but a set of adjacent threads carrying mass in opposite directions. It identifies three temperature components—cool H-$\alpha$ flow at $10$--$20\,\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}}$ and warm ultraviolet/extreme-ultraviolet flows at $40$--$70\,\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}}$—and reports an unusually large nonthermal line width of about $40\,\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}}$ in Si IV, interpreted as micro-turbulence. These flows are said to originate in compact brightenings at the filament's ends, where Si IV and C II lines show broadening and intensity enhancements indicating localized chromospheric heating. At the flow bases, the authors find small-scale photospheric flux emergence and cancellation events of order $10^{17}$ Mx, which they propose as the driver of the persistent upflows and heating. A note on the provided text: the manuscript body is an unrelated paper on CPU-GPU memory, so the abstract is the only located support for these claims.

What carries the argument

The interleaved-thread interpretation of counter-streaming flows, combined with multi-thermal spectral diagnostics (H-$\alpha$, Si IV 1400 Å, C II) and photospheric magnetograms. The line profiles connect bulk speeds to temperature components; the Si IV nonthermal width ($40\,\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}}$) is the evidence for micro-turbulence; the Si IV and C II broadening and intensity enhancement at the bases is the evidence for localized chromospheric heating; and the $10^{17}$ Mx flux emergence and cancellation events are the proposed magnetic driver.

What would settle it

Observe one footpoint brightening with high-cadence IRIS sit-and-stare spectroscopy and simultaneous H-$\alpha$ Dopplergrams: if a two-component or multi-Gaussian fit removes the $40\,\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}}$ nonthermal width, the micro-turbulence claim fails; if photospheric flux cancellation peaks only after the upflows begin, the proposed magnetic driver is not the cause.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the central discovery is that what appears to be counter-streaming in a forming active-region filament is actually interleaved, unidirectional mass flows in neighboring threads, each flow multi-thermal: a cool H-$\alpha$ component at $10$--$20\,\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}}$ and warm ultraviolet/extreme-ultraviolet components at $40$--$70\,\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}}$. The Si IV 1400 Å line shows a nonthermal velocity width of $40\,\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}}$, interpreted as significant micro-turbulence in the filament's flows. These flows emerge from compact brightenings at the filament's ends as small-scale, collimated upflows, continuously injecting both chromospheric and transition-region plasma i

Load-bearing premise

The claim collapses if the abstract's interpretation is not backed by the actual observations—and in the provided text the only support is the abstract itself, since the manuscript body is an unrelated CPU-GPU memory paper.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Counter-streaming in filaments should be interpreted as a superposition of independent neighboring threads, so single-slit or low-resolution observations may mix flows that are not actually oscillating together.
  • A forming filament can be fed from below by persistent multi-thermal upflows rather than only by condensation from the corona.
  • Weak magnetic flux cancellation at the $10^{17}$ Mx scale can be sufficient to produce localized transition-region and chromospheric heating together with sustained upflows.
  • Mass-supply estimates for filaments must separately account for the cool H-alpha component and the warm UV/EUV components, because they move at different speeds.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If footpoint flux cancellation is the driver, then the same $10^{17}$ Mx scale should predict upflow brightness and speed in other forming filaments; a quantitative flux-versus-upflow scaling would be a testable extension of the paper's claim.
  • The reported $40\,\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}}$ nonthermal width could alternatively be unresolved bulk motion in a highly inclined thread; if so, the true flow speeds would be higher than the stated $40$--$70\,\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}}$, and multi-Gaussian fitting of the line profiles would settle whether micro-turbulence is real.
  • The compact brightenings feeding the filament resemble small-scale reconnection events seen in other solar features; connecting their occurrence rate to filament mass growth would let observers test whether footpoint heating alone can build a filament.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper's abstract claims an observational study of multi-thermal counter-streaming flows in a forming active-region filament, using NVST, IRIS, and SDO data. It reports cool H-alpha flow speeds of 10--20 km/s, warm UV/EUV components of 40--70 km/s, a 40 km/s nonthermal Si IV line width interpreted as micro-turbulence, compact brightenings at filament ends feeding the flows, localized chromospheric heating at footpoints, and 10^17 Mx flux emergence/cancellation events as likely drivers. However, the full manuscript text supplied for review is entirely a computer-architecture paper on AMD MI300A APU unified physical memory (arXiv:2508.12743). It contains no solar observations, no methods, no data analysis, no figures, and no tables pertaining to filaments, NVST, IRIS, SDO, Si IV, H-alpha, or flux cancellation. The central claim of the abstract therefore has no evidentiary support in the submitted manuscript.

Significance. If the claimed observational analysis were present and correct, the result could be a meaningful contribution to understanding the multi-thermal origin of filament counter-streaming flows and the role of weak photospheric magnetic activity in localized chromospheric heating. The reported combination of multi-instrument imaging/spectroscopy with magnetic-flux measurements would be of interest to the solar-physics community. However, the submitted text provides none of the supporting analysis. Because the manuscript body is an unrelated paper, the scientific claim is unverifiable from the submitted material, and no significance can be assigned to the result as presented.

major comments (4)
  1. [Full text (all sections)] The submitted full text is not the paper described in the abstract. The body, from the title through the references, is 'Dissecting CPU-GPU Unified Physical Memory on AMD MI300A APUs' (arXiv:2508.12743, cs.DC). It contains no mention of filaments, NVST, IRIS, SDO, Si IV 1400 Å, H-alpha, transition-region upflows, or photospheric flux cancellation. Every load-bearing element of the abstract -- the flow-speed measurements, the 40 km/s nonthermal width, the footpoint heating, and the 10^17 Mx flux events -- is therefore unsupported by any presented methodology, data, figure, or table. The manuscript cannot be evaluated as a solar-physics paper.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract's quantitative claims, e.g., 'nonthermal velocity width of 40 km/s' and 'flux emergence and cancellation events, with magnitude of 10^17 Mx', require spectral fitting procedures, line-profile analysis, uncertainty estimates, and magnetogram analysis. None of these are present. There is no description of the data reduction, spectral window, fitting function, or error analysis. As a result, the key assertion that the Si IV width indicates micro-turbulence rather than unresolved bulk flows, projection effects, or instrumental broadening is untestable from the submitted text.
  3. [Abstract / Interpretation] The causal interpretation -- that small-scale flux emergence/cancellation drives persistent upflows and localized chromospheric heating -- is presented without supporting evidence and without consideration of alternative explanations. The abstract itself notes 'possibly associated with unresolved magnetic reconnection events,' but no test, control, or quantitative association is provided. Since the manuscript body contains none of the observational material, the central interpretive claim is not merely incomplete; it has no evidentiary foundation in the reviewed file.
  4. [Header and metadata] The manuscript header displays 'arXiv:2508.12743v1 [cs.DC]' and lists authors whose names and affiliation match the computer-architecture paper, not the solar-physics abstract. This internal inconsistency confirms that the wrong full text accompanies the submitted abstract, and it is visible in the material under review. The appropriate solar-physics manuscript must be supplied before any substantive review is possible.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation is present; the provided full text is an unrelated computer-architecture paper, so the solar-physics abstract's claims are unsupported rather than circular.

full rationale

The manuscript supplied as the full text is 'Dissecting CPU-GPU Unified Physical Memory on AMD MI300A APUs' (arXiv:2508.12743, cs.DC) by different authors; it contains no NVST, IRIS, SDO, filament, Si IV, H-alpha, or flux-cancellation analysis. The abstract to be reviewed asserts a complete observational derivation chain (identification of counter-streaming flows, multi-thermal components, 40 km/s nonthermal width, footpoint heating, 10^17 Mx magnetic events), but none of the corresponding measurements, spectral fits, or error analyses appear in the visible text. Because there is no derivation chain on the page, there is also no fitted-input-called-prediction loop, no self-citation doing load-bearing work, and no quantity defined in terms of another. The defect is an evidentiary/attribution mismatch, not circularity. Per the rubric, a non-finding is the honest result: score 0. The interpretive steps in the abstract (line broadening = micro-turbulence/heating; flux events = causal drivers) would be competing-inference issues for correctness review, not circularity, even if the correct solar manuscript were present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The observable content of this submission is the abstract only. No free parameters are stated (the 40 km/s nonthermal width is a measured output, not a fitted input). Nothing in the abstract introduces new physical entities such as new particles, forces, or dimensions. The three axioms listed are the interpretive steps that carry the causal narrative from spectral signatures to flows, heating, and magnetic driving; the manuscript body is an unrelated paper and provides no evidence to bank against these assumptions.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Interleaved unidirectional flows in neighboring threads are spatially resolved, and line-of-sight velocity differences map to true flow speeds with negligible projection effects.
    The abstract identifies the flows as 'interleaved unidirectional mass flows in opposing directions occurring in neighboring threads' and quotes speeds of 10-20 km/s (H-alpha) and 40-70 km/s (UV/EUV); thread separation and de-projection are not demonstrated in the provided text.
  • domain assumption The 40 km/s nonthermal velocity width of Si IV 1400 Å is micro-turbulence, and Si IV / C II line broadening with intensity enhancement at the bases is localized chromospheric heating.
    Abstract states 'significant micro-turbulence' and 'pronounced line broadening and intensity enhancements, indicating significant localized chromospheric heating'; alternative broadening mechanisms (unresolved bulk flows, opacity, instrumental effects) are not excluded in the provided text.
  • domain assumption Photospheric flux emergence and cancellation events (~10^17 Mx) near the footpoints are causally linked to the persistent upflows and heating, possibly through unresolved magnetic reconnection.
    The abstract's last sentence phrases this as 'We suggest such weak magnetic-field activities... drive these persistent upflows and localized footpoint heating'; correlation versus causation is not established in the provided material.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Observational Analysis of Multi-thermal Counter-streaming Flows in a Forming Filament and Their Relationship with Local Heating at Filament Footpoints." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TXDJE37P

@misc{pith2026250812737,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Observational Analysis of Multi-thermal Counter-streaming Flows in a Forming Filament and Their Relationship with Local Heating at Filament Footpoints},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TXDJE37P}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.12737}
}
abstract

Utilizing high-resolution imaging and spectroscopic observations from the New Vacuum Solar Telescope (NVST), the Interface Region Imaging Spectrograph (IRIS), and the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO), we investigated the nature and origin of counter-streaming flows within a forming active region filament. The ever-present counter-streaming flows observed within the filament are identified as interleaved unidirectional mass flows in opposing directions occurring in neighboring threads. Multi-wavelength observations corroborate the multi-thermal nature of these counter-streaming flows: the cool H$\alpha$ component flows at about 10--20 km s$^{-1}$, while the warm ultraviolet and extreme ultraviolet components reach 40--70 km s$^{-1}$. The Si~{\sc iv} 1400~{\AA} line reveals significant micro-turbulence in the filament's counter-streaming flows, with a nonthermal velocity width of 40 km s$^{-1}$. These multi-thermal flows emanate from compact brightenings at the filament's ends, manifesting as small-scale, collimated upflows at their nascent phase. They continuously inject both chromospheric and transition region plasma into the filament channel, thereby feeding the counter-streaming flows. At their base, the Si~{\sc iv} and C~{\sc ii} spectral lines show pronounced line broadening and intensity enhancements, indicating significant localized chromospheric heating. Additionally, numerous small-scale photospheric flux emergence and cancellation events, with magnitude of $10^{17}$~Mx, are detected near their base. We suggest such weak magnetic-field activities, possibly associated with unresolved magnetic reconnection events, drive these persistent upflows and localized footpoint heating. This work elucidates the multi-thermal origin of counter-streaming flows within a forming filament and provides evidence of localized chromospheric heating at the filament footpoints.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Page placement strategies for GPUs within heterogeneous memory systems,

    N. Agarwal, D. Nellans, M. Stephenson, M. O’Connor, and S. W. Keckler, “Page placement strategies for GPUs within heterogeneous memory systems, ” in Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems , 2015, pp. 607–618

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    Demystifying GPU UVM cost with deep runtime and workload analysis,

    T. Allen and R. Ge, “Demystifying GPU UVM cost with deep runtime and workload analysis, ” in 2021 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS) , IEEE, 2021, pp. 141–150

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    In-depth analyses of unified virtual memory system for GPU accelerated comput- ing,

    T. Allen and R. Ge, “In-depth analyses of unified virtual memory system for GPU accelerated comput- ing, ” in Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, 2021, pp. 1–15

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    [Online]

    AMD, AMD CDNA 3 architecture , 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/ en/documents/instinct-tech-docs/white-papers/amd- cdna-3-white-paper.pdf

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    AMD Instinct MI300

    AMD, "AMD Instinct MI300" instruction set archi- tecture reference guide , 2024. [Online]. Available: https : / / www . amd . com / content / dam / amd / en / documents / instinct - tech - docs / instruction - set - architectures/amd-instinct-mi300-cdna3-instruction- set-architecture.pdf

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    [Online]

    AMD, HIP STREAM . [Online]. Available: https : / / github.com/amd/HPCTrainingExamples/tree/main/ HIP/hip-stream

    work page

  7. [7]

    [Online]

    AMD, ROCm examples . [Online]. Available: https : //github.com/ROCm/rocm-examples

    work page

  8. [8]

    [Online]

    AMD, Source-code comment in amdgpu driver. [Online]. Available: https : / / github . com / ROCm / ROCK - Kernel - Driver / blob / 49cf5a6cfbc364b9902c20143c59302e6317ca6d/drivers/ gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_pt.c#L760

    work page

Show all 34 references
  1. [9]

    Lotus: Characterization of machine learning preprocessing pipelines via framework and hardware profiling,

    R. Bachkaniwala, H. Lanka, K. Rong, and A. Gavrilovska, “Lotus: Characterization of machine learning preprocessing pipelines via framework and hardware profiling, ” in 2024 IEEE International Sym- posium on Workload Characterization (IISWC) , IEEE, 2024, pp. 30–43

    2024

  2. [10]

    Local adaptive mesh refinement for shock hydrodynamics,

    M. J. Berger and P. Colella, “Local adaptive mesh refinement for shock hydrodynamics, ” Journal of computational Physics , vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 64–84, 1989

    1989

  3. [11]

    Performance analysis of runtime han- dling of zero-copy for OpenMP programs on MI300A 11 APUs,

    C. Bertolli, T. Blass, L. Stringer, N. Aschenbrenner, J.-P. Lehr, D. Bercea, D. Chakrabarti, L. Meadows, and R. Lieberman, “Performance analysis of runtime han- dling of zero-copy for OpenMP programs on MI300A 11 APUs, ” inSC24-W: Workshops of the International Con- ference fo...

    2024

  4. [12]

    Rodinia: A benchmark suite for heterogeneous computing,

    S. Che, M. Boyer, J. Meng, D. Tarjan, J. W. Sheaffer, S.-H. Lee, and K. Skadron, “Rodinia: A benchmark suite for heterogeneous computing, ” in 2009 IEEE international symposium on workload characterization (IISWC), Ieee, 2009, pp. 44–54

    2009

  5. [13]

    PORPLE: An extensible optimizer for portable data placement on GPU,

    G. Chen, B. Wu, D. Li, and X. Shen, “PORPLE: An extensible optimizer for portable data placement on GPU, ” in 2014 47th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture , IEEE, 2014, pp. 88– 100

    2014

  6. [14]

    Performance evaluation of advanced features in CUDA unified memory,

    S. Chien, I. Peng, and S. Markidis, “Performance evaluation of advanced features in CUDA unified memory, ” in 2019 IEEE/ACM Workshop on Memory Centric High Performance Computing (MCHPC) , IEEE, 2019, pp. 50–57

    2019

  7. [15]

    Memory harvesting in multi-GPU systems with hierarchical unified virtual memory,

    S. Choi, T. Kim, J. Jeong, R. Ausavarungnirun, M. Jeon, Y. Kwon, and J. Ahn, “Memory harvesting in multi-GPU systems with hierarchical unified virtual memory, ” in2022 USENIX Annual Technical Conference (USENIX ATC 22) , 2022, pp. 625–638

    2022

  8. [16]

    Shared virtual memory: Its design and performance implications for diverse applications,

    B. Cooper, T. R. Scogland, and R. Ge, “Shared virtual memory: Its design and performance implications for diverse applications, ” in Proceedings of the 38th ACM International Conference on Supercomputing , 2024, pp. 26–37

    2024

  9. [17]

    Cumming and M

    B. Cumming and M. Fatica, CUDA STREAM. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/bcumming/cuda-stream

  10. [18]

    A not so simple matter of software,

    J. Dongarra, “A not so simple matter of software, ” 2021 ACM A.M. Turing Award Lecture, Dallas, USA, 2022

    2021

  11. [19]

    Understanding data movement in tightly coupled heterogeneous systems: A case study with the Grace Hopper superchip,

    L. Fusco, M. Khalilov, M. Chrapek, G. Chukkapalli, T. Schulthess, and T. Hoefler, “Understanding data movement in tightly coupled heterogeneous systems: A case study with the Grace Hopper superchip, ”arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.11556 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Interplay between hardware prefetcher and page eviction policy in CPU-GPU unified virtual memory,

    D. Ganguly, Z. Zhang, J. Yang, and R. Melhem, “Interplay between hardware prefetcher and page eviction policy in CPU-GPU unified virtual memory, ” in Proceedings of the 46th International Symposium on Computer Architecture , 2019, pp. 224–235

    2019

  13. [21]

    [Online]

    Google, Multichase – a pointer chasing benchmark . [Online]. Available: https : / / github . com / google / multichase

  14. [22]

    Hydrodynamics challenge problem, Lawrence Liv- ermore National Laboratory,

    R. D. Hornung, J. A. Keasler, and M. B. Gokhale, “Hydrodynamics challenge problem, Lawrence Liv- ermore National Laboratory, ” Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, Tech. Rep. LLNL- TR-490254, 2011, pp. 1–17

    2011

  15. [23]

    Lam, Inside the AMD Instinct MI300A’s giant memory subsystem , 2025

    C. Lam, Inside the AMD Instinct MI300A’s giant memory subsystem , 2025. [Online]. Available: https: //chipsandcheese.com/p/inside- the- amd- radeon- instinct-mi300as

    2025

  16. [24]

    An investigation of unified memory access performance in CUDA,

    R. Landaverde, T. Zhang, A. K. Coskun, and M. Herbordt, “An investigation of unified memory access performance in CUDA, ” in 2014 IEEE High Perfor- mance Extreme Computing Conference (HPEC) , IEEE, 2014, pp. 1–6

    2014

  17. [25]

    DrGPUM: Guiding mem- ory optimization for GPU-accelerated applications,

    M. Lin, K. Zhou, and P. Su, “DrGPUM: Guiding mem- ory optimization for GPU-accelerated applications, ” in Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, Volume 3 , 2023, pp. 164–178

    2023

  18. [26]

    Exascale implicit kinetic plasma simulations on El Capitan for solving the micro-macro coupling in magnetospheric physics,

    S. Markidis, A. Hu, I. Peng, L. Pennati, I. Lumsden, D. Yokelson, S. Brink, O. Pearce, T. R. Scogland, B. R. de Supinski, G. L. Delzanno, and M. Taufer, “Exascale implicit kinetic plasma simulations on El Capitan for solving the micro-macro coupling in magnetospheric physics, ...

    2025 arXiv

  19. [27]

    J. D. McCalpin, STREAM: Sustainable memory band- width in high performance computers . [Online]. Avail- able: https://www.cs.virginia.edu/stream/

  20. [28]

    Enhanced system-level coherence for heterogeneous unified memory architectures,

    A. M. Nataraja, R. Fernández-Pascual, and A. Ros, “Enhanced system-level coherence for heterogeneous unified memory architectures, ” in 2024 IEEE Inter- national Symposium on Workload Characterization (IISWC), IEEE, 2024, pp. 273–283

    2024

  21. [29]

    Harnessing integrated CPU-GPU system memory for HPC: A first look into Grace Hopper,

    G. Schieffer, J. Wahlgren, J. Ren, J. Faj, and I. Peng, “Harnessing integrated CPU-GPU system memory for HPC: A first look into Grace Hopper, ” in Proceed- ings of the 53rd International Conference on Parallel Processing, 2024, pp. 199–209

    2024

  22. [30]

    Inter-APU communication on AMD MI300A systems via Infinity Fabric: A deep dive,

    G. Schieffer, J. Wahlgren, R. Shi, E. Leon, R. Pearce, M. Gokhale, and I. Peng, “Inter-APU communication on AMD MI300A systems via Infinity Fabric: A deep dive, ” inProceedings of the International Symposium on Memory Systems , 2025, pp. 1–14

    2025

  23. [31]

    CUDAAdvisor: LLVM-based runtime profiling for modern GPUs,

    D. Shen, S. L. Song, A. Li, and X. Liu, “CUDAAdvisor: LLVM-based runtime profiling for modern GPUs, ” in Proceedings of the 2018 International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization , 2018, pp. 214–227

    2018

  24. [32]

    Realizing the AMD exascale heterogeneous processor vision: Industry product,

    A. Smith, G. H. Loh, M. J. Schulte, M. Ignatowski, S. Naffziger, M. Mantor, M. F. N. Kalyanasundharam, V. Alla, N. Malaya, J. L. Greathouse, et al. , “Realizing the AMD exascale heterogeneous processor vision: Industry product, ” in 2024 ACM/IEEE 51st Annual International Symp...

    2024

  25. [33]

    Porting HPC applications to AMD Instinct ™ MI300A using unified memory and OpenMP,

    S. Tandon, L. Grinberg, G. -T. Bercea, C. Bertolli, M. Olesen, S. Bna, and N. Malaya, “Porting HPC applications to AMD Instinct ™ MI300A using unified memory and OpenMP, ” in ISC High Performance 2024 Research Paper Proceedings (39th International Conference), Prometeus GmbH, ...

    2024

  26. [34]

    [Online]

    Top500.org, June 2025 list , 2025. [Online]. Available: https://top500.org/lists/top500/2025/06/. 12

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.