Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 48 references

Bright 25-attosecond light pulses reach the one atomic unit of time

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read A 25-attosecond soft-X-ray pulse reaches one atomic unit of time (24.2 as), with brightness roughly three orders of magnitude above earlier soft-X-ray attosecond sources.

desk verdict Genuine record claim with credible core measurement, but the overclaims about flux and the atomic unit, plus the unresolved satellite-retrieval ambiguity, make this a conditional accept. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.14774 v1 pith:67J74WJH submitted 2025-08-20 physics.atom-ph physics.optics

classification physics.atom-phphysics.optics
keywords attosecondpulseshigh-orderharmonicgenerationsoftX-rayatomicunitoftimestreakingattochirpcompensationYblaserpost-compressionvelocity-mapimaging
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports the generation of isolated soft-X-ray pulses lasting 25±2 attoseconds—the shortest light pulses reported to date—produced by high-order harmonic generation in helium driven by a post-compressed industrial Yb laser. The pulses span 50–320 eV, crossing the carbon K-edge, and carry a calibrated flux above 10^12 photons per second, roughly a thousand times brighter than earlier soft-X-ray attosecond sources. Pulse duration is established by angle-resolved photoelectron streaking on helium, with variable-thickness carbon filters used to cancel the intrinsic positive chirp (attochirp) of the harmonics, and a fast quasi-Newton retrieval algorithm (VTQNA) reconstructs the temporal envelope. The result approaches 24.2 attoseconds, one atomic unit of time—the natural timescale of a ground-state electron crossing a Bohr radius—so if correct it places tabletop lasers at the boundary where atomic and ionic dynamics unfold.

What carries the argument

Several coupled elements carry the argument. The driver is a cascaded gas-cell post-compression of an industrial Yb laser to near-single-cycle 3.7-fs pulses, which pushes the phase-matched HHG cutoff in helium past 300 eV despite the 1030-nm wavelength. A semi-infinite helium cell sustains filamentation-assisted self-guiding, raising conversion efficiency and flux. The intrinsic positive attochirp of short-trajectory harmonics is compensated by carbon filters of 200–600 nm thickness, whose negative group-delay dispersion balances the chirp; the near-symmetric streaking trace at 500 nm signals optimal compensation. Finally, the Volkov Transform Quasi-Newton Algorithm (VTQNA) reconstructs the

What would settle it

A decisive test would be an independent, full-envelope measurement that does not assume a single dominant peak—for example, an interferometric XUV–IR correlation or a photoelectron streaking measurement spanning both hemispheres and several energy windows—checking how much reconstructed energy lies outside the main 25-as peak. If the energy in the satellite bursts is comparable to that in the main peak, or if a second reconstruction method yields a substantially different duration, the isolated-pulse claim would fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that an isolated attosecond pulse of 25±2 as can be produced and fully characterized at a brightness of >10^12 photons/s, making it the shortest and brightest tabletop soft-X-ray attosecond pulse to date. The pulse is generated by focusing 3.7-fs, CEP-stabilized, 0.8-mJ pulses at 1030 nm into a semi-infinite helium gas cell; phase-matched harmonics extend from 50 to 320 eV. The authors retrieve the time-domain envelope from angle-resolved streaking traces on helium, after compensating the harmonic attochirp with carbon filters of increasing thickness. The resulting FWHM histogram gives 25±2 as, approaching the 24.2-as atomic unit of time.

Load-bearing premise

The claim's load-bearing premise is that the generated radiation is a single isolated main pulse whose duration is described by its FWHM, with the surrounding satellite pulses treated as weak remnants; if those satellites actually carry a significant share of the pulse energy, the 25±2 as number would not describe the true light pulse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, tabletop attosecond sources now operate at the 24.2-as atomic unit of time, the natural scale for valence-electron motion, so the shortest electron dynamics in atoms become in principle resolvable.
  • The 50–320 eV spectrum crosses the carbon K-edge at 284 eV, so the same source can drive element-specific, carbon-selective ultrafast spectroscopies.
  • A flux above 10^12 photons/s makes helium streaking practical and should permit partial-wave-resolved photoionization time-delay measurements with much higher statistics than earlier sources.
  • VTQNA's quasi-Newton acceleration turns broadband attosecond pulse retrieval from a multi-day computation into a roughly 20-minute desktop task, enabling systematic filter-by-filter optimization.
  • Using a robust industrial Yb amplifier rather than mid-IR parametric sources avoids the low stability and poor conversion efficiency of previous shortest-pulse drivers, potentially broadening access to attosecond science.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper stops short of demonstrating time-resolved spectroscopy; one natural next step is to use the bright carbon-K-edge continuum for transient X-ray absorption on carbon-containing molecules, a measurement the flux now makes plausible.
  • Because the Fourier-transform-limited duration of the spectrum is 11.4 as while the retrieved pulse is 25±2 as, residual higher-order dispersion beyond linear chirp still limits the pulse; this suggests pulse-shaping beyond uniform filter thickness could push closer to or past the 24.2-as mark.
  • The same driver architecture and retrieval scheme could likely be applied to neon or argon targets for narrower spectral ranges, or to higher-repetition-rate Yb systems, trading bandwidth for count rate in photon-hungry coincidence measurements.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper reports the generation and characterization of isolated soft-X-ray attosecond pulses with a retrieved main-pulse FWHM of 25 ± 2 as, driven by a post-compressed, CEP-stabilized Yb-based laser system. The harmonic spectrum spans 50–320 eV, and the calibrated photon flux is stated to exceed 10^12 photons/s. The pulse duration is obtained from angle-resolved photoelectron streaking on helium using a velocity-map imaging spectrometer, with attochirp compensation by variable-thickness carbon filters. The retrieval is performed with a newly introduced algorithm, VTQNA, an accelerated variant of VTGPA. The authors claim a new world record and state that the pulses reach the one atomic unit of time (24.2 as).

Significance. If the claims hold, this is a substantial advance: it would be the shortest isolated attosecond pulse reported to date, and it would demonstrate that industrial-grade Yb lasers can drive bright soft-X-ray HHG beyond the carbon K edge. The systematic filter-thickness series, the use of a helium streaking target, and the provision of source code and data are commendable strengths. However, the two headline claims—the isolated 25-as duration and the three-orders-of-magnitude brightness improvement—require closer scrutiny. The former depends on the treatment of residual satellite pulses in the retrieval, and the latter appears to be a numerical overstatement.

major comments (2)
  1. [Attosecond pulse retrieval by VTQNA; Fig. 5C] The central claim is an isolated 25-as pulse, but the retrieved intensity envelope in Fig. 5C contains 'residual satellite pulses' with no quantified contrast or upper bound. The main text does not state how VTQNA constrains or penalizes satellite amplitudes, nor does it demonstrate that the retrieved main-pulse FWHM is unique. A different, equally good fit with multiple comparable bursts would invalidate the 'isolated' label and the quoted 25-as FWHM. The continuum at CEP=π (Fig. 2D) is necessary but not sufficient evidence of single-burst emission. Please provide a satellite-to-main intensity ratio, a convergence/uniqueness analysis, or an independent time-domain test of isolation. This is load-bearing for the world-record claim.
  2. [Abstract; 'In-line attosecond streaking beamline'; Summary] The flux improvement is repeatedly stated as 'approximately three orders of magnitude' or 'three-order-of-magnitude improvement' over the 53-as source of Ref. [29]. The comparison is 10^12 photons/s versus 5×10^9 photons/s, which is a factor of 200—about two orders of magnitude, not three. This quantitative overstatement appears in the abstract and the concluding paragraph and should be corrected.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 5D and 'Attosecond pulse retrieval by VTQNA'] The uncertainty ±2 as is attributed to 'three standard deviations of the mean (i.e., 3σ).' This wording is ambiguous: please clarify whether the histogram represents repeated measurements, different retrieval runs, or another ensemble, and state whether the quoted value is 3σ of the distribution or 3σ of the standard error of the mean.
  2. [Summary] The summary says the pulses 'cross the threshold of one atomic unit of time,' while the title says 'reach' the atomic unit. Since 25 as is slightly above 24.2 as, 'approach' or 'reach the threshold' would be more precise than 'cross.'
  3. [Fig. 5C] Please annotate the relative intensity of the main pulse versus the residual satellites, or at least provide the numerical contrast in the caption. This would help readers assess the 'dominant main pulse' statement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity: the central 25±2 as duration is obtained by inverting measured streaking traces, not by fitting or defining the duration as an input.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is largely self-contained. (1) The HHG spectrum is measured directly (Fig. 2A-D), and the 11.4 as Fourier-transform-limit is computed from the measured spectral amplitude, not imposed by the retrieval. (2) The 25±2 as value is extracted from the time-domain intensity envelope returned by VTQNA, which minimizes the residual between measured and retrieved streaking traces (merit below 3×10^-5). The cost function compares measured photoelectron spectra to Volkov-transform predictions; no statement in the paper shows that the 25 as FWHM is an input or target of that optimization. (3) Attochirp compensation is optimized by observing left-right asymmetry of streaking traces and varying filter thickness, an independent diagnostic; the retrieved durations at 400 nm (30±2 as) and 600 nm (37±2 as) are consistent with under- and over-compensation, showing the retrieval is not anchored to a pre-chosen shortest value. (4) Phase-matching cutoff predictions in Fig. 1B are compared with independent Ar and Ne measurements and agree, so those predictions are not circular. The self-citations that exist—Ref. [36] for cascaded post-compression, Ref. [37] for filamentation-assisted generation, Ref. [48] for an autocorrelation representation—are technical or supporting results from overlapping authors, but the central attosecond-pulse duration claim does not reduce to them, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from those citations to forbid alternatives. The residual satellite pulses noted in Fig. 5C are an acknowledged ambiguity about whether the pulse is truly isolated; however, the paper does not quote a constraint that forces the retrieved main lobe to 25 as, so this is a correctness/robustness risk rather than a demonstrable circular step. Overall, no equation or fitted parameter reduces the central claim to its own inputs; the minor self-citations are not load-bearing, giving a score of 2.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim relies on standard strong-field and single-active-electron approximations, plus the known dispersion of carbon filters. No ad hoc entities or fitted free parameters are introduced; the VTQNA is a numerical inversion of measured data.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Volkov (strong-field) approximation for streaking of high-energy photoelectrons
    Standard in attosecond metrology; neglects Coulomb distortion and multi-electron effects; justified by high electron kinetic energies (tens to hundreds of eV). Invoked implicitly by the VTQNA retrieval (Section 'Attosecond pulse retrieval by VTQNA').
  • domain assumption Helium 1s single-orbital photoionization
    Used to avoid spectral overlap of multiple orbitals in streaking; assumes negligible contributions from other ionization channels. Stated in the section 'Characterization challenges'.
  • domain assumption Isolated attosecond pulse generation via amplitude gating
    The paper claims isolated pulses but does not directly prove the absence of multiple emission bursts; the presence of satellites is acknowledged. This underlies the interpretation of the main peak as the pulse.
  • domain assumption Known dispersion of carbon filters
    The attochirp compensation assumes the filters introduce the calculated group delay dispersion, which is relied upon when selecting the 500-nm filter as optimal. Discussed in 'Compensation of SXR attochirp'.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bright 25-attosecond light pulses reach the one atomic unit of time." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/67J74WJH

@misc{pith2026250814774,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bright 25-attosecond light pulses reach the one atomic unit of time},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/67J74WJH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.14774}
}
abstract

Generating ever-shorter and brighter light pulses has long been a central pursuit in ultrafast science, as it benchmarks our ability to create and manipulate the coherence on the intrinsic timescale of sub-atomic electron motion. The current state-of-the-art in attosecond pulse generation reaches durations of 40-50 attoseconds (1 as = $10^{-18}$ seconds), produced via high-order harmonic generation (HHG) driven by secondary mid-infrared light sources. However, these sources often suffer from low stability and poor HHG conversion efficiency. In this work, we demonstrate the generation of 25$\pm$2 attosecond light pulses, a new world record for the shortest light pulse, driven by a post-compressed, industrial-grade Yb-based laser system. The resulting high-harmonic spectrum spans photon energies from 50 eV to 320 eV, covering the carbon K-edge, with a calibrated photon flux exceeding $10^{12}$ photons per second, approximately three orders of magnitude higher than previous studies. The pulse duration was characterized using an angle-resolved photoelectron streaking camera on helium atoms and systematically optimized through the use of dielectric filters of varying thicknesses to compensate the attochirp. Our study reaches the threshold of one atomic unit of time (24.2 attoseconds), the boundary between atomic and ionic physics, opening the door to resolving exciting ionic quantum dynamics with tabletop lasers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.14774 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Atomic-unit-level attosecond light pulse generation. (A) Progress in pulse duration for table-top isolated attosecond light sources. Different postcompression techniques, hollow￾core fiber (HCF), multi-pass cell (MPC) and cascaded gas cells (CASCADE) are distinguished with different lineshapes. (B) Phase-matched cut-off energies for Ar, Ne, and He targets in HHG driven by Yb lasers centered at 1030 nm, plotted as a … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. CEP-resolved HHG supercontinuum spectra from helium target at 2.5 bar. (A￾D) Measured HHG supercontinuum spectra with 200-nm-thick Sn, Zr, Al and Carbon, respec￾tively. The solid red curves in each panels represent the transmission of the corresponding filter. The four data sets are measured with the same exposure time for the camera in the HHG spectrometer and thus their relative intensities can be compared with th… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Angle-resolved photoelectron streaking camera. (A-D) Measured raw photoelec￾tron VMI images with 200-nm Sn, Al, Zr and C filters, respectively. In B, we mark the sharp Al absorption L edge at 73 eV. In C, we mark the Zr absorption L edge at 210 eV, which is clearly smaller than the distribution with the C filter shown in D. Note that these four data sets are also measured with the same exposure time and averaged fra… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Attochirp compensation. (A-C) Calculated streaking traces based on strong-field approximation with chirp-free, positive chirped (GDD = 400 as2 ) and negative chirped (GDD = - 400 as2 ) SXR pulses, respectively. A GDD of -400 as2 is approximately provided by a 200-nm-th…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Attosecond pulse retrieval. (A-B) Measured (A) and retrieved (B) streaking traces with a 500-nm-thick carbon filter, respectively. Note that the measured and retrieved results are presented in the same linear-scale-intensity colorbar. (C) Intensity envelope and tempora…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [29]

    53-attosecond x-ray pulses reach the carbon k-edge

    Jie Li, Xiaoming Ren, Yanchun Yin, Kun Zhao, Andrew Chew, Yan Cheng, Eric Cunning- ham, Yang Wang, Shuyuan Hu, Yi Wu, et al. 53-attosecond x-ray pulses reach the carbon k-edge. Nature communications, 8(1):186, 2017

  2. [1]

    Observation of a train of attosec- ond pulses from high harmonic generation

    Pierre-Marie Paul, Elena S Toma, Pierre Breger, Genevive Mullot, Fr ´ed´erika Aug ´e, Ph Balcou, Harm Geert Muller, and Pierre Agostini. Observation of a train of attosec- ond pulses from high harmonic generation. Science, 292(5522):1689–1692, 2001

  3. [2]

    Attosecond metrology

    Michael Hentschel, Reinhard Kienberger, Ch Spielmann, Georg A Reider, Nenad Milo- sevic, Thomas Brabec, Paul Corkum, Ulrich Heinzmann, Markus Drescher, and Ferenc Krausz. Attosecond metrology. Nature, 414(6863):509–513, 2001

  4. [3]

    Attosecond streak camera

    J Itatani, F Qu ´er´e, Gennady L Yudin, M Yu Ivanov, Ferenc Krausz, and Paul B Corkum. Attosecond streak camera. Physical review letters, 88(17):173903, 2002. 14

  5. [4]

    Direct measurement of light waves

    Eleftherios Goulielmakis, Matthias Uiberacker, Reinhard Kienberger, Andrius Bal- tuska, Vladislav Yakovlev, Armin Scrinzi, Th Westerwalbesloh, U Kleineberg, Ulrich Heinzmann, Markus Drescher, et al. Direct measurement of light waves. Science, 305(5688):1267–1269, 2004

  6. [5]

    Compression of high-energy laser pulses below 5 fs.Optics letters, 22(8):522–524, 1997

    Mauro Nisoli, Sandro De Silvestri, Orazio Svelto, R Szip ¨ocs, K Ferencz, Ch Spielmann, S Sartania, and Ferenc Krausz. Compression of high-energy laser pulses below 5 fs.Optics letters, 22(8):522–524, 1997

  7. [6]

    Attosecond control of electronic processes by intense light fields

    Andrius Baltu ˇska, Th Udem, Matthias Uiberacker, Michael Hentschel, Eleftherios Goulielmakis, Ch Gohle, Ronald Holzwarth, Vladislav S Yakovlev, Armin Scrinzi, Th W H¨ansch, et al. Attosecond control of electronic processes by intense light fields. Nature, 421(6923):611–615, 2003

  8. [7]

    Bright coherent ultrahigh harmonics in the kev x-ray regime from mid-infrared femtosecond lasers

    Tenio Popmintchev, Ming-Chang Chen, Dimitar Popmintchev, Paul Arpin, Susannah Brown, Skirmantas Aliˇsauskas, Giedrius Andriukaitis, Tadas Balˇciunas, Oliver D M¨ucke, Audrius Pugzlys, et al. Bright coherent ultrahigh harmonics in the kev x-ray regime from mid-infrared femtosecond lasers. science, 336(6086):1287–1291, 2012

Show all 48 references
  1. [8]

    Delay in photoemission

    Martin Schultze, Markus Fieß, Nicholas Karpowicz, Justin Gagnon, Michael Korbman, Michael Hofstetter, S Neppl, Adrian L Cavalieri, Yannis Komninos, Th Mercouris, et al. Delay in photoemission. science, 328(5986):1658–1662, 2010

  2. [9]

    Photoionization in the time and frequency domain

    M Isinger, RJ Squibb, D Busto, S Zhong, A Harth, D Kroon, S Nandi, CL Arnold, M Mi- randa, J Marcus Dahlstr ¨om, et al. Photoionization in the time and frequency domain. Science, 358(6365):893–896, 2017

  3. [10]

    Coherent imaging of an attosecond electron wave packet

    DM Villeneuve, Paul Hockett, MJJ Vrakking, and Hiromichi Niikura. Coherent imaging of an attosecond electron wave packet. Science, 356(6343):1150–1153, 2017

  4. [11]

    Sven Grundmann, Daniel Trabert, Kilian Fehre, Nico Strenger, Andreas Pier, Leon Kaiser, Max Kircher, Miriam Weller, Sebastian Eckart, Lothar Ph. H. Schmidt, Florian Trinter, Till Jahnke, Markus S. Sch ¨offler, and Reinhard D ¨orner. Zeptosecond birth time delay in molecular ph...

  5. [12]

    Attosecond spec- troscopy of liquid water

    Inga Jordan, Martin Huppert, Dominik Rattenbacher, Michael Peper, Denis Jelovina, Conaill Perry, Aaron von Conta, Axel Schild, and Hans Jakob W ¨orner. Attosecond spec- troscopy of liquid water. Science, 369(6506):974–979, 2020

  6. [13]

    Extreme–ultraviolet high–harmonic generation in liquids

    Tran Trung Luu, Zhong Yin, Arohi Jain, Thomas Gaumnitz, Yoann Pertot, Jun Ma, and Hans Jakob W ¨orner. Extreme–ultraviolet high–harmonic generation in liquids. Nature communications, 9(1):3723, 2018

  7. [14]

    Attosecond spectroscopy in condensed matter

    Adrian L Cavalieri, Norbert M ¨uller, Th Uphues, Vladislav S Yakovlev, Andrius Baltuˇska, Balint Horvath, B Schmidt, L Bl¨umel, Ronald Holzwarth, Stefan Hendel, et al. Attosecond spectroscopy in condensed matter. Nature, 449(7165):1029–1032, 2007

  8. [15]

    Direct time-domain observation of attosecond final- state lifetimes in photoemission from solids

    Zhensheng Tao, Cong Chen, Tibor Szilv ´asi, Mark Keller, Manos Mavrikakis, Henry Kapteyn, and Margaret Murnane. Direct time-domain observation of attosecond final- state lifetimes in photoemission from solids. Science, 353(6294):62–67, 2016

  9. [16]

    Solid-state harmonics beyond the atomic limit

    Georges Ndabashimiye, Shambhu Ghimire, Mengxi Wu, Dana A Browne, Kenneth J Schafer, Mette B Gaarde, and David A Reis. Solid-state harmonics beyond the atomic limit. Nature, 534(7608):520–523, 2016

  10. [17]

    Progress on table-top isolated attosecond light sources

    Katsumi Midorikawa. Progress on table-top isolated attosecond light sources. Nature Photonics, 16(4):267–278, 2022

  11. [18]

    Atomic transient recorder

    Reinhard Kienberger, Eleftherios Goulielmakis, Matthias Uiberacker, Andrius Bal- tuska, Vladislav Yakovlev, Ferdinand Bammer, Armin Scrinzi, Th Westerwalbesloh, Ulf Kleineberg, Ulrich Heinzmann, et al. Atomic transient recorder. Nature, 427(6977):817– 821, 2004

  12. [19]

    Isolated single-cycle attosecond pulses

    Giuseppe Sansone, Enrico Benedetti, Francesca Calegari, Caterina V ozzi, Lorenzo Avaldi, Roberto Flammini, Luca Poletto, Paolo Villoresi, Carlo Altucci, Raffaele Velotta, et al. Isolated single-cycle attosecond pulses. Science, 314(5798):443–446, 2006

  13. [20]

    Coherent water window x ray by phase-matched high-order harmonic gen- eration in neutral media

    Eiji J Takahashi, Tsuneto Kanai, Kenichi L Ishikawa, Yasuo Nabekawa, and Katsumi Midorikawa. Coherent water window x ray by phase-matched high-order harmonic gen- eration in neutral media. Physical review letters, 101(25):253901, 2008. 16

  14. [21]

    Single-cycle nonlinear optics

    Eleftherios Goulielmakis, Martin Schultze, Michael Hofstetter, Vladislav S Yakovlev, Justin Gagnon, M Uiberacker, Andrew L Aquila, EM Gullikson, David T Attwood, Rein- hard Kienberger, et al. Single-cycle nonlinear optics. Science, 320(5883):1614–1617, 2008

  15. [22]

    Synthesized light transients

    Adrian Wirth, M Th Hassan, Ivanka Grguraˇs, Justin Gagnon, Antoine Moulet, Tran Trung Luu, S Pabst, R Santra, ZA Alahmed, AM Azzeer, et al. Synthesized light transients. Science, 334(6053):195–200, 2011

  16. [23]

    Tailoring a 67 attosecond pulse through advantageous phase-mismatch.Optics letters, 37(18):3891– 3893, 2012

    Kun Zhao, Qi Zhang, Michael Chini, Yi Wu, Xiaowei Wang, and Zenghu Chang. Tailoring a 67 attosecond pulse through advantageous phase-mismatch.Optics letters, 37(18):3891– 3893, 2012

  17. [24]

    0.5-kev soft x-ray attosecond continua

    Stephan M Teichmann, F Silva, SL Cousin, M Hemmer, and J Biegert. 0.5-kev soft x-ray attosecond continua. Nature communications, 7(1):11493, 2016

  18. [25]

    Streaking of 43-attosecond soft-x-ray pulses generated by a passively cep-stable mid-infrared driver

    Thomas Gaumnitz, Arohi Jain, Yoann Pertot, Martin Huppert, Inga Jordan, Fernando Ardana-Lamas, and Hans Jakob W ¨orner. Streaking of 43-attosecond soft-x-ray pulses generated by a passively cep-stable mid-infrared driver. Optics express, 25(22):27506– 27518, 2017

  19. [26]

    Attosecond streaking in the water window: A new regime of attosecond pulse characterization

    Seth L Cousin, Nicola Di Palo, B ´arbara Buades, Stephan M Teichmann, M Reduzzi, M Devetta, Anatoli Kheifets, G Sansone, and Jens Biegert. Attosecond streaking in the water window: A new regime of attosecond pulse characterization. Physical Review X, 7(4):041030, 2017

  20. [27]

    Sub-cycle millijoule-level parametric waveform synthesizer for attosecond science

    Giulio Maria Rossi, Roland E Mainz, Yudong Yang, Fabian Scheiba, Miguel A Silva- Toledo, Shih-Hsuan Chia, Phillip D Keathley, Shaobo Fang, Oliver D M ¨ucke, Cristian Manzoni, et al. Sub-cycle millijoule-level parametric waveform synthesizer for attosecond science. Nature Photo...

  21. [28]

    Carrier-envelope phase-dependent high harmonic generation in the water window using few-cycle infrared pulses

    Nobuhisa Ishii, Keisuke Kaneshima, Kenta Kitano, Teruto Kanai, Shuntaro Watanabe, and Jiro Itatani. Carrier-envelope phase-dependent high harmonic generation in the water window using few-cycle infrared pulses. Nature Communications, 5(1):3331, 2014. 17

  22. [30]

    Carrier envelope phase stabilization of a yb: Kgw laser amplifier

    Tadas Bal ˇci¯unas, Oliver D M ¨ucke, Paulius Mi ˇseikis, Giedrius Andriukaitis, Audrius Pugˇzlys, Linas Gini ¯unas, Romas Danielius, Ronald Holzwarth, and Andrius Baltu ˇska. Carrier envelope phase stabilization of a yb: Kgw laser amplifier. Optics letters, 36(16):3242–3244, 2011

  23. [31]

    Direct compression of 170-fs 50-cycle pulses down to 1.5 cycles with 70% trans- mission

    Young-Gyun Jeong, Riccardo Piccoli, Denis Ferachou, Vincent Cardin, Michael Chini, Steffen H¨adrich, Jens Limpert, Roberto Morandotti, Franc ¸ois L´egar´e, Bruno E Schmidt, et al. Direct compression of 170-fs 50-cycle pulses down to 1.5 cycles with 70% trans- mission. Scientif...

  24. [32]

    Multipass cell for high-power few-cycle compression

    Michael M ¨uller, Joachim Buldt, Henning Stark, Christian Grebing, and Jens Limpert. Multipass cell for high-power few-cycle compression. Optics letters, 46(11):2678–2681, 2021

  25. [33]

    Carrier-envelope phase stable few-cycle laser system delivering more than 100 w, 1 mj, sub-2-cycle pulses

    Steffen H ¨adrich, Evgeny Shestaev, Maxim Tschernajew, Fabian Stutzki, Nico Walther, Florian Just, Marco Kienel, Imre Seres, P´eter J´oj´art, Zsolt Bengery, et al. Carrier-envelope phase stable few-cycle laser system delivering more than 100 w, 1 mj, sub-2-cycle pulses. Optics...

  26. [34]

    Guiding of laser pulses at the theoretical limit–97% throughput hollow-core fibers– with subsequent compression to 1.3 cycles

    Young-Gyun Jeong, Alexis Labranche, Riccardo Piccoli, Andrea Rovere, Luca Zanotto, Gabriel Tempea, Derrek Wilson, Maksym Ivanov, Alicia Ramirez, Roberto Morandotti, et al. Guiding of laser pulses at the theoretical limit–97% throughput hollow-core fibers– with subsequent compr...

  27. [35]

    Multioctave supercontinuum generation and frequency conversion based on ro- tational nonlinearity

    John E Beetar, M Nrisimhamurty, Tran-Chau Truong, Garima C Nagar, Yangyang Liu, Jonathan Nesper, Omar Suarez, Federico Rivas, Yi Wu, Bonggu Shim, and Michael Chini. Multioctave supercontinuum generation and frequency conversion based on ro- tational nonlinearity. Science Advan...

  28. [36]

    Nonlinear compression toward high-energy single-cycle pulses by cascaded focus and compression

    Ming-Shian Tsai, An-Yuan Liang, Chia-Lun Tsai, Po-Wei Lai, Ming-Wei Lin, and Ming- Chang Chen. Nonlinear compression toward high-energy single-cycle pulses by cascaded focus and compression. Science advances, 8(31):eabo1945, 2022

  29. [37]

    Filamentation-assisted isolated attosecond pulse generation

    Yu-En Chien, Marina Fern ´andez-Gal´an, Ming-Shian Tsai, An-Yuan Liang, Enrique Conejero-Jarque, Javier Serrano, Julio San Rom ´an, Carlos Hern´andez-Garc´ıa, and Ming- Chang Chen. Filamentation-assisted isolated attosecond pulse generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.06339, 2024

  30. [38]

    Synthesis of single-cycle pulses based on a yb: Kgw laser amplifier

    Zekun Pi, Hee-Yong Kim, and Eleftherios Goulielmakis. Synthesis of single-cycle pulses based on a yb: Kgw laser amplifier. Optica, 12(3):296–301, 2025

  31. [39]

    Few-cycle yb-doped laser sources for attosecond science and strong-field physics

    Tran-Chau Truong, Dipendra Khatri, Christopher Lantigua, Chelsea Kincaid, and Michael Chini. Few-cycle yb-doped laser sources for attosecond science and strong-field physics. APL Photonics, 10(4), 2025

  32. [40]

    V olkov transform generalized projection algorithm for attosecond pulse characterization

    Phillip Donald Keathley, Siddharth Bhardwaj, J Moses, G Laurent, and Franz X Kaertner. V olkov transform generalized projection algorithm for attosecond pulse characterization. New Journal of Physics, 18(7):073009, 2016

  33. [41]

    Complete reconstruction of ultra- broadband isolated attosecond pulses including partial averaging over the angular distri- bution

    Thomas Gaumnitz, Arohi Jain, and Hans Jakob W¨orner. Complete reconstruction of ultra- broadband isolated attosecond pulses including partial averaging over the angular distri- bution. Optics Express, 26(11):14719–14740, 2018

  34. [42]

    Hearing carrier- envelope offset frequency and phase in air with a microphone

    Meng Han, Ming-Chang Chen, Ming-Shian Tsai, and Hao Liang. Hearing carrier- envelope offset frequency and phase in air with a microphone. Optica, 12(4):459–464, 2025

  35. [43]

    Waveform-dependent air fluorescence from neutral and ionic nitrogen molecules

    Hao Liang, Ming-Shian Tsai, Chun-Chia Tseng, Ming-Chang Chen, Uwe Thumm, and Meng Han. Waveform-dependent air fluorescence from neutral and ionic nitrogen molecules. Science Advances, 11(23):eadu9200, 2025

  36. [44]

    Thick-lens velocity-map imaging spectrometer with high resolution for high-energy charged particles

    NG Kling, D Paul, A Gura, G Laurent, S De, H Li, Z Wang, B Ahn, CH Kim, TK Kim, et al. Thick-lens velocity-map imaging spectrometer with high resolution for high-energy charged particles. Journal of Instrumentation, 9(05):P05005, 2014. 19

  37. [45]

    Atomic subshell photoionization cross sections and asymmetry pa- rameters: 1<z<103

    JJ Yeh and I Lindau. Atomic subshell photoionization cross sections and asymmetry pa- rameters: 1<z<103. Atomic data and nuclear data tables, 32(1):1–155, 1985

  38. [46]

    Sin- gle sub-50-attosecond pulse generation from chirp-compensated harmonic radiation us- ing material dispersion

    Kyung Taec Kim, Chul Min Kim, Moon-Gu Baik, G Umesh, and Chang Hee Nam. Sin- gle sub-50-attosecond pulse generation from chirp-compensated harmonic radiation us- ing material dispersion. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 69(5):051805, 2004

  39. [47]

    Amplitude and phase control of attosecond light pulses

    Rodrigo Lopez-Martens, Katalin Varj ´u, Per Johnsson, Johan Mauritsson, Yann Mairesse, Pascal Salieres, Mette B Gaarde, Kenneth J Schafer, Anders Persson, Sune Svanberg, et al. Amplitude and phase control of attosecond light pulses. Physical Review Letters, 94(3):033001, 2005

  40. [48]

    Metrology of time-domain soft x-ray attosecond pulses and reevaluation of pulse durations of three recent experiments

    Xi Zhao, Su-Ju Wang, Wei-Wei Yu, Hui Wei, Changli Wei, Bincheng Wang, Jigen Chen, and CD Lin. Metrology of time-domain soft x-ray attosecond pulses and reevaluation of pulse durations of three recent experiments. Physical Review Applied, 13(3):034043, 2020. Acknowledgments. We...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.