Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 102 references

Graph Learning for Foreign Exchange Rate Prediction and Statistical Arbitrage

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that modeling currencies and foreign-exchange rates as a spatiotemporal graph improves exchange-rate prediction and produces statistical-arbitrage portfolios with a 61.89% higher information ratio and a 45.51% higher Sortin

desk verdict The submission cannot be evaluated: the metadata and abstract describe an FX graph-learning paper, but the full text supplied is an unrelated quark-matter paper, so none of the central claims are checkable. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.14784 v1 pith:EI6RT7O2 submitted 2025-08-20 q-fin.TR

Yoonsik Hong , Diego Klabjan This is my paper
classification q-fin.TR
keywords foreignexchangepredictiongraphlearningstatisticalarbitragespatiotemporaledge-levelregressionstochasticoptimizationinformationratioobservation-executionlag
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a two-step graph-learning approach to foreign exchange statistical arbitrage. It first frames exchange-rate prediction as edge-level regression on a spatiotemporal graph—currencies are nodes, exchanges are edges, interest rates are node features, and FX rates are edge features—and then solves a stochastic optimization for arbitrage portfolios that explicitly accounts for the lag between observing a price and executing a trade. The authors claim statistically significant improvements in mean squared error for the predictor, and that the arbitrage strategy achieves a 61.89% higher information ratio and a 45.51% higher Sortino ratio than a benchmark. They also prove that the strategy satisfies empirical arbitrage constraints. If correct, the work offers a graph-based perspective on FX modeling that captures cross-currency and currency-interest-rate relationships in one structure.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the discrete-time spatiotemporal graph: currencies as nodes, exchanges as edges, interest rates as node features, and foreign-exchange rates as edge features. FXRP is edge-level regression on this graph, which lets one model all currency pairs and their interest-rate relationships jointly. The second component is a stochastic optimization with an observation-execution time lag, whose constraints are enforced by projection and ReLU; a second graph with exchanges as nodes and influence relationships as edges is used to maximize risk-adjusted return while the FXRP predictions feed the constraint parameters and node features.

What would settle it

The supplied full text is an unrelated article on quark matter; the FXRP and FXSA experiments, the proof, and the benchmark definition are absent from the provided materials. A concrete check would be to run the FXSA strategy out of sample on tick data with realistic transaction costs and a named benchmark: if the excess information and Sortino ratios do not survive, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that foreign-exchange rate prediction and statistical arbitrage can be unified through graph learning. FXRP is cast as predicting the value on each exchange edge of a discrete-time spatiotemporal graph whose nodes are currencies and whose node features are interest rates; the FX rate on each edge is the target. A graph-learning model then exploits relationships across many currencies and their interest rates. FXSA is a separate stochastic optimization that constructs arbitrage portfolios under an observation-execution time lag, enforcing constraints by projection and ReLU, using FXRP predictions for constraint parameters and node features. The paper states that this meth

Load-bearing premise

The FXSA returns persist after real trading frictions—the abstract accounts for the observation-execution lag but not transaction costs, liquidity, or capacity, and the benchmark behind the 61.89% and 45.51% improvements is unnamed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the reported MSE gains hold, graph learning becomes a viable alternative for FX prediction by explicitly modeling multi-currency and interest-rate relationships.
  • If the 61.89% information-ratio and 45.51% Sortino-ratio gains hold, the lag-aware optimization adds a practical edge over strategies that ignore execution timing.
  • The proof that FXSA satisfies empirical arbitrage constraints implies a formal guarantee that the allocation stays within the arbitrage-consistent region, rather than merely being optimized toward it.
  • The formulation treats FXRP as a building block for FXSA, so better forecasts should translate directly into better constraint parameters and node features in the arbitrage layer.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same graph formulation could extend to other multi-asset markets—commodities, crypto, or cross-listed equities—where cross-asset relationships and execution lags are also first-order concerns.
  • The proof of empirical arbitrage constraints may generalize into a formal risk-control layer for high-frequency portfolio optimization beyond FX.
  • The reported improvements depend on the unnamed benchmark; a fair comparison with standard FX momentum or carry strategies would clarify the practical edge.
  • The observation-execution lag model could be combined with transaction-cost and liquidity models to test whether the strategy's capacity is large enough for institutional deployment.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The submission's abstract claims a two-step graph-learning framework for foreign exchange rate prediction (FXRP) and foreign exchange statistical arbitrage (FXSA). The claimed contributions are: an edge-level regression formulation on a discrete-time spatiotemporal graph; a stochastic optimization that accounts for observation-execution time lag; a graph-learning FXSA method using projections and ReLU to enforce constraints; a proof that the FXSA method satisfies empirical arbitrage constraints; and experimental results showing statistically significant MSE improvements, a 61.89% higher information ratio, and a 45.51% higher Sortino ratio than a benchmark. However, the supplied full text is arXiv:2508.14795v2 [hep-ph], "Nonstrange and strange quark matter at finite temperature within modified NJL model and protoquark stars", by Wen-Li Yuan, Nobutoshi Yasutake, and Renxin Xu. This full text is entirely unrelated to the abstract and contains no derivation, experiment, benchmark, dataset description, or proof relevant to FXRP/FXSA. As supplied, the manuscript cannot be evaluated.

Significance. If the claims were supported by a complete manuscript, the proposed graph-learning formulation for FXRP and the lag-aware FXSA optimization could be a useful contribution to quantitative finance, particularly the idea of modeling currencies as nodes and exchanges as edges with interest-rate features. The stated risk-adjusted return improvements are substantial. However, none of this content is present in the submitted record. There is no reproducible code, no machine-checked proof, no experimental setup, and no benchmark definition. The significance of the purported contribution is therefore unassessable from the submitted materials.

major comments (4)
  1. [Full Text] The entire full text supplied is an unrelated quark matter paper (arXiv:2508.14795v2, 'Nonstrange and strange quark matter at finite temperature within modified NJL model and protoquark stars'). It contains no description of the FXRP formulation, the spatiotemporal graph, the FXSA stochastic optimization, the projection/ReLU constraint enforcement, or any experiment on foreign exchange data. Consequently, every central claim of the abstract—the graph-learning method, the lag-aware optimization, the proof of arbitrage constraint satisfaction, and the quantitative performance numbers—is unsupported by the submitted manuscript. This is not a local flaw but an absence of the entire claimed work.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract asserts 'statistically significant improvements in mean squared error' and specific relative improvements of 61.89% in information ratio and 45.51% in Sortino ratio. The manuscript provides no dataset description, no definition of the benchmark, no details of the train/test split, no error bars, and no statistical test. These numbers cannot be checked or reproduced. The benchmark behind the percentages is unnamed, so the claim is not falsifiable as stated.
  3. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'we prove that our FXSA method satisfies empirical arbitrage constraints.' No proof appears anywhere in the supplied text. Moreover, since the method 'enforces constraints through projection and ReLU,' the constraint satisfaction could be true by construction and thus carry no economic content unless the constraints are shown to be no-arbitrage conditions that remain meaningful after the projection. A formal statement of the arbitrage condition, the constraint set, the feasibility argument, and the proof is required.
  4. [Full Text / Abstract] The statistical arbitrage claim requires post-cost, out-of-sample performance. The abstract only models the time lag between price observation and trade execution; it says nothing about transaction costs, bid-ask spreads, liquidity, or capacity. Even if the reported MSE and risk-adjusted ratios were correct in the paper's own setting, the arbitrage claim would fail if the excess returns do not survive realistic frictions. This load-bearing assumption is not addressed in the submitted record.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Full Text header] The full-text header carries arXiv:2508.14795v2, while the submitted manuscript is arXiv:2508.14784. The identifier and version do not match the claimed paper.
  2. [Abstract] The acronyms FXRP and FXSA are used without definition in the abstract. They should be expanded at first use: foreign exchange rate prediction and foreign exchange statistical arbitrage.
  3. [Full Text] No figures, tables, or equations in the submitted text correspond to the graph-learning method, the optimization, or the experiments. A reader cannot locate any of the claimed contributions.
  4. [Full Text] The reference list is entirely on dense-matter physics; there is no literature context for foreign exchange prediction, statistical arbitrage, or graph learning. This reinforces that the supplied body is not the manuscript described in the abstract.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

FXSA 'arbitrage constraint' proof appears to hold by construction via projection/ReLU; remaining FX claims unverifiable because supplied full text is an unrelated hep-ph paper.

  1. self definitional [Abstract, second step (FXSA formulation and proof claim)]
    "we propose a graph-learning method that enforces constraints through projection and ReLU ... Moreover, we prove that our FXSA method satisfies empirical arbitrage constraints."

    The constraints the method enforces—via projection and ReLU—are the same 'empirical arbitrage constraints' whose satisfaction is then claimed as a proven result. If the enforced set is the arbitrage set, every output of the method is feasible by construction, so the 'proof' is a restatement of the enforcement mechanism rather than an independent economic guarantee. No transaction costs, benchmark definition, or out-of-sample evidence is supplied in the abstract to show that feasibility constitutes profitable arbitrage.

  2. other [Entire supplied full text: arXiv:2508.14795v2 [hep-ph] header and Sections I–VI]
    "Nonstrange and strange quark matter at finite temperature within modified NJL model and protoquark stars ... arXiv:2508.14795v2 [hep-ph] 17 Feb 2026"

    The supplied full text is a completely different paper by different authors on NJL quark matter, not the FX graph-learning paper announced in the abstract. None of the FXRP formulation, dataset, experiment, benchmark, or FXSA arbitrage proof appears in the record. This is an omitted-proof / missing-support flag rather than an internal circularity, but per the review rule it is weighed in the verdict: the central FX claims cannot be checked.

full rationale

The abstract is the only FX-related text in the submission; the attached full text is arXiv:2508.14795 (a hep-ph paper on modified NJL quark matter and protoquark stars). I therefore cannot walk a complete derivation chain for the FX claims. The one visible circular reduction is the FXSA 'proof': the method is said to enforce constraints through projection and ReLU, and then it is said to provably satisfy empirical arbitrage constraints. If 'empirical arbitrage constraints' denote the enforced constraint set, satisfaction is true by construction and does not establish economic arbitrage; the claimed guarantee is definitionally equivalent to the enforcement step. The statistically significant MSE improvements and the 61.89% / 45.51% benchmark ratios cannot be verified from the supplied record, since no experiment, dataset, or benchmark description exists in the body. This is not an accusation of fraud; it is a statement that the evidentiary record contains no support for the quantitative or theoretical FX claims. The score of 6 reflects the by-construction constraint-satisfaction proof plus the unverifiability of the remaining central claims; it is not a finding that the full paper is necessarily circular from its own equations, because those equations are absent here.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This ledger is assembled from the abstract because the manuscript body supplied with arXiv:2508.14784 is actually arXiv:2508.14795v2, a paper on quark matter and protoquark stars. As far as the visible materials show, the central claim rests on three unstated modeling and evaluation premises listed above, plus an unnamed benchmark. No free parameters can be counted because the model description is absent. Re-run this audit on the correct full text.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Currencies as nodes, exchanges as edges, and interest rates as node features on a discrete-time spatiotemporal graph capture the relationships that make FX movements predictable.
    Core modeling premise of step one in the abstract. No justification appears in the available materials because the full text is a different paper.
  • domain assumption FX rates are not efficient with respect to this graph encoding: historical signal persists into the execution window after accounting for the observation-execution lag.
    Required for both the FXRP accuracy claim and the FXSA profitability claim. The abstract does not argue for or test this premise.
  • domain assumption The benchmark for the 61.89% information ratio and 45.51% Sortino ratio comparisons is a fair, previously established baseline.
    The abstract never identifies the benchmark, so the headline improvements cannot be interpreted. This is load-bearing for the empirical claims.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Graph Learning for Foreign Exchange Rate Prediction and Statistical Arbitrage." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EI6RT7O2

@misc{pith2026250814784,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Graph Learning for Foreign Exchange Rate Prediction and Statistical Arbitrage},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EI6RT7O2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.14784}
}
read the original abstract

We propose a two-step graph learning approach for foreign exchange statistical arbitrages (FXSAs), addressing two key gaps in prior studies: the absence of graph-learning methods for foreign exchange rate prediction (FXRP) that leverage multi-currency and currency-interest rate relationships, and the disregard of the time lag between price observation and trade execution. In the first step, to capture complex multi-currency and currency-interest rate relationships, we formulate FXRP as an edge-level regression problem on a discrete-time spatiotemporal graph. This graph consists of currencies as nodes and exchanges as edges, with interest rates and foreign exchange rates serving as node and edge features, respectively. We then introduce a graph-learning method that leverages the spatiotemporal graph to address the FXRP problem. In the second step, we present a stochastic optimization problem to exploit FXSAs while accounting for the observation-execution time lag. To address this problem, we propose a graph-learning method that enforces constraints through projection and ReLU, maximizes risk-adjusted return by leveraging a graph with exchanges as nodes and influence relationships as edges, and utilizes the predictions from the FXRP method for the constraint parameters and node features. Moreover, we prove that our FXSA method satisfies empirical arbitrage constraints. The experimental results demonstrate that our FXRP method yields statistically significant improvements in mean squared error, and that the FXSA method achieves a 61.89% higher information ratio and a 45.51% higher Sortino ratio than a benchmark. Our approach provides a novel perspective on FXRP and FXSA within the context of graph learning.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    two-flavor modified NJL model The Lagrangian of the two-flavor NJL model reads: L 2f NJL =L0 +G h ( ¯ψψ) 2 + ¯ψiγ 5τ ψ 2i , L0 = ¯ψ iγµ∂µ −m+µγ 0 ψ . (1) Here,L 0 denotes the relativistic free field, which describes the propagation of non-interacting fermions.Gis the four- fermion interaction coupling constant.ψis the quark field operator with color, flav...

  2. [2]

    The matricesλ i (i= 1→8)correspond to the Gell-Mann matrices in flavor space.λ 0 = p 2/3I 0, withI 0 being the identity matrix

    three-flavor modified NJL model The Lagrangian density of the three-flavor NJL model is given by L 3f NJL =L 0 +L 3f int , L 3f int =L 4 σ +L 6 σ , L4 σ = 8X i=0 G h ¯ψλiψ 2 + ¯ψiγ 5λiψ 2i , L6 σ =−K det ¯ψ 1 +γ 5 ψ + det ¯ψ 1−γ 5 ψ , (9) whereL 4 σ andL 6 σ represent the four-fermion and six-fermion interaction terms, respectively.GandKdenote the couplin...

  3. [3]

    Prakash, I

    M. Prakash, I. Bombaci, M. Prakash, et al. 1997, Phys. Rep., 280, 1

    1997

  4. [4]

    Reddy, M

    S. Reddy, M. Prakash, & J. M. Lattimer, 1998, Phys. Rev. D, 58, 1, 013009. 12

    1998

  5. [5]

    A. W. Steiner, M. Prakash, & J. M. Lattimer, 2000, Phys. Lett. B,486, 3-4, 239

    2000

  6. [6]

    J. A. Pons, A. W. Steiner, M. Prakash, et al. 2001, Phys. Rev. Lett.,86, 23, 5223

    2001

  7. [7]

    A. W. Steiner, M. Prakash, & J. M. Lattimer, 2001, Phys. Lett. B, 509, 1-2, 10

    2001

  8. [8]

    O. E. Nicotra, M. Baldo, G. F. Burgio, et al. 2006, Phys. Rev. D,74, 12, 123001

    2006

Show all 102 references
  1. [9]

    G. F. Burgio, & S. Plumari, 2008, Phys. Rev. D,77, 8, 085022

    2008

  2. [10]

    Yasutake, & K

    N. Yasutake, & K. Kashiwa, 2009, Phys. Rev. D,79, 4, 043012

    2009

  3. [11]

    G. Y . Shao, 2011, Phys. Lett. B,704, 4, 343

    2011

  4. [12]

    H. Chen, M. Baldo, G. F. Burgio, et al. 2012, Phys. Rev. D, 86, 4, 045006

    2012

  5. [13]

    D. P. Menezes, A. Deppman, E. Megıas, et al. 2015, Eur. Phys. J. A.,51, 155

    2015

  6. [14]

    C. A. Raithel, F. ¨Ozel, & D. Psaltis, 2019, Astrophys. J,875, 1, 12

    2019

  7. [15]

    A. R. Bodmer, 1971, Phys. Rev. D,4, 1601

    1971

  8. [16]

    Witten, 1984, Phys

    E. Witten, 1984, Phys. Rev. D,30, 272

    1984

  9. [17]

    Chakrabarty, S

    S. Chakrabarty, S. Raha, & B. Sinha, 1989, Phys. Lett. B,229, 112

    1989

  10. [18]

    M. Dey, I. Bombaci, J. Dey, et al. 1998, Phys. Lett. B,438, 123

    1998

  11. [19]

    Chakrabarty, 1993, Phys

    S. Chakrabarty, 1993, Phys. Rev. D,48, 1409

    1993

  12. [20]

    Buballa, & M

    M. Buballa, & M. Oertel, 1999, Phys. Lett. B,457, 261

    1999

  13. [21]

    G. X. Peng, H. C. Chiang, J. J. Yang, et al. 1999, Phys. Rev. C,61, 015201

    1999

  14. [22]

    X. J. Wen, X. H. Zhong, G. X. Peng, et al. 2005, Phys. Rev. C, 72, 015204

    2005

  15. [23]

    A. Li, R. X. Xu, & J. F. Lu, 2010, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 402, 2715

    2010

  16. [24]

    E. P. Zhou, X. Zhou, & A. Li, 2018, Phys. Rev. D,97, 083015

    2018

  17. [25]

    C. M. Li, Y . Yan, J. J. Geng, et al. 2018, Phys. Rev. D,98, 083013

    2018

  18. [26]

    C. J. Xia, T. Maruyama, N. Yasutake, et al. 2019, Phys. Rev. D,99, 103017

    2019

  19. [27]

    G. X. Peng, H. C. Chiang, B. S. Zou, et al. 2000, Phys. Rev. C,62, 025801

    2000

  20. [28]

    Bai, & Y

    Z. Bai, & Y . X. Liu. 2021, Eur. Phys. J. C,81, 612

    2021

  21. [29]

    C. J. Xia, , Z. Zhu, X. Zhou, et al. 2021, Chinese Phys. C,45, 055104

    2021

  22. [30]

    W. L. Yuan, A. Li, Z. Q. Miao, et al. 2022, Phys. Rev. D,105, 123004

    2022

  23. [31]

    Y . R. Zhou, C. Zhang, J. Zhao, et al. 2024, Phys. Rev. D,110, 103012

    2024

  24. [32]

    X. L. Zhang, Y . F. Huang, & Z. C. Zou, 2024, Front. Astron. Space Sci.,11, 1409463

    2024

  25. [33]

    Holdom, J

    B. Holdom, J. Ren, & C. Zhang, 2018, Phys. Rev. Lett.,120, 222001

    2018

  26. [34]

    T. Zhao, W. Zheng, F. Wang, et al. 2019, Phys. Rev. D,100, 043018

    2019

  27. [35]

    Zhang, 2020, Phys

    C. Zhang, 2020, Phys. Rev. D,101, 043003

    2020

  28. [36]

    Zhang, & R

    C. Zhang, & R. B. Mann, 2021, Phys. Rev. D,103, 063018

    2021

  29. [37]

    T. E. Restrepo, C. Provid ˆencia, & M. B. Pinto, 2023, Phys. Rev. D,107, 114015

    2023

  30. [38]

    L. Q. Su, C. Shi, Y . F. Huang, et al. 2024, Astrophys.Space Sci.,369, 29

    2024

  31. [39]

    Z. C. Yang, T. X. Zeng, Yan, Y ., W. L. Yuan, C. Zhang, and E. P. Zhou, 2025, arXiv:2507.00776

    2025

  32. [40]

    R. X. Xu, 2003, Astrophys. J. Lett.,596, L59

    2003

  33. [41]

    X. Y . Lai, & R. X. Xu, 2009, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.,398, L31

    2009

  34. [42]

    Zhang, Y

    C. Zhang, Y . Gao, C. J. Xia, et al. 2023, Phys. Rev. D,108, 063002

    2023

  35. [43]

    W. L. Yuan, C. Huang, C. Zhang, E. P. Zhou, and R. X. Xu 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 111, 6, 063033

    2025

  36. [44]

    J. H. Taylor, R. N. Manchester, & A. G. Lyne, 1993, Astro- phys. J. Suppl. Ser.,88, 529

    1993

  37. [45]

    X. D. Li, S. Ray, J. Dey, et al. 1999, Astrophys. J. Lett.,527, 1, L51

    1999

  38. [46]

    K. S. Cheng, Z. G. Dai, D. M. Wei, et al. 1998, Science,280, 407

    1998

  39. [47]

    X. D. Li, I. Bombaci, M. Dey, et al. 1999, Phys. Rev. Lett.,83, 19, 3776

    1999

  40. [48]

    Doroshenko, V

    V . Doroshenko, V . Suleimanov, G. P¨uhlhofer, et al. 2022, Nat. Astron.,6, 1444

    2022

  41. [49]

    H. T. Janka, T. Zwerger, & R. Moenchmeyer, 1993, Astron. Astrophys.,268, 1, 360

    1993

  42. [50]

    J. M. Lattimer, & D. F. Swesty, 1991, Nucl. Phys. A,535, 2, 331

    1991

  43. [51]

    H. Shen, H. Toki, K. Oyamatsu, et al. 1998, Nucl. Phys. A, 637, 3, 435

    1998

  44. [52]

    Hempel, & J

    M. Hempel, & J. Schaffner-Bielich, 2010, Nucl. Phys. A,837, 3-4, 210

    2010

  45. [53]

    Z. Y . , Zhu, S., Zha, & S. Han, 2025, arXiv:2506.17569

    2025

  46. [54]

    D. P. Menezes, C. Provid ˆencia, & D. B. Melrose, 2006, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Phys.,32, 8, 1081

    2006

  47. [55]

    Dexheimer, J

    V . Dexheimer, J. R. Torres, & D. P. Menezes, 2013, Eur. Phys. J. C,73, 2569

    2013

  48. [56]

    Dexheimer, D

    V . Dexheimer, D. P. Menezes, & M. Strickland, 2014, J. Phys. G Nucl. Partic.,41, 1, 015203

    2014

  49. [57]

    P. C. Chu, X. H. Li, B. Wang, et al. 2017, Eur. Phys. J. C,77, 8, 512

    2017

  50. [58]

    P. C. Chu, Y . Zhou, X. H. Li, et al. 2019, Phys. Rev. D,100, 10, 103012

    2019

  51. [59]

    L. L. Lopes, C. Biesdorf, K. D. Marquez, et al. 2021, Phys. Scr.,96, 6, 065302

    2021

  52. [60]

    S. P. Klevansky, Rev. Mod. Phys.64, 649 (1992)

    1992

  53. [61]

    Buballa, 2005, Phys

    M. Buballa, 2005, Phys. Rep.407, 205

    2005

  54. [62]

    Huang, P

    M. Huang, P. F. Zhuang, & W. Q. Chao, 2003, Phys. Rev. D, 67, 065015

    2003

  55. [63]

    Blaschke, S

    D. Blaschke, S. Fredriksson, H. Grigorian, et al. 2005, Phys. Rev. D,72, 065020

    2005

  56. [64]

    F. Wang, Y . Cao, & H. S. Zong, 2019, Chin. Phys. C,43, 084102

    2019

  57. [65]

    Minamikawa, T

    T. Minamikawa, T. Kojo, &M. Harada, 2021, Phys. Rev. C, 104, 065201

    2021

  58. [66]

    C. J. Xia, 2024, Phys. Rev. D,110, 014022

    2024

  59. [67]

    Gholami, M

    H. Gholami, M. Hofmann, & M. Buballa, 2025, Phys. Rev. D,111, 014006

    2025

  60. [68]

    Gholami, I

    H. Gholami, I. A. Rather, M. Hofmann, M. Buballa, and J. Schaffner-Bielich, 2024, arXiv:2411.04064

    2024 arXiv

  61. [69]

    L. K. Yang, X. F. Luo, & H. S. Zong, 2019, Phys. Rev. D,100, 094012

    2019

  62. [70]

    Q. W. Wang, C. Shi, & H. S. Zong, 2021, Chinese Phys. C, 45, 8, 084110

    2021

  63. [71]

    Z. X. Yu, T. Zhao, & H. S. Zong, 2020, Chin. Phys. C,44, 074104

    2020

  64. [72]

    L. Q. Su, C. Shi, Y . H. Xia, et al. 2020, Phys. Rev. D,102, 054028

    2020

  65. [73]

    W. L. Yuan, J. Y . Chao, & A. Li, 2023, Phys. Rev. D,108, 043008

    2023

  66. [74]

    W. L. Yuan, & A. Li, 2024, Astrophys. J.,966, 3

    2024

  67. [75]

    L. K. Yang, D. S. Fan, C. M. Li, et al. 2025, , arXiv:2507.06676. 13

    2025 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Q. W. Wang, T. Zhao, & H. S. Zong, 2020, Mod. Phys. Lett. A,35, 2050321

    2020

  69. [77]

    L., Yuan, B

    W. L., Yuan, B. K. Gao, Y . Yan, et al. 2024, arXiv:2408.05687

    2024

  70. [78]

    L., Yuan, Gao, B

    W. L., Yuan, Gao, B. K. , Y ., Yan, et al. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 112, 2, 023019

    2025

  71. [79]

    J. I. Kapusta and C. Gale, Finite-Temperature Field Theory, by Joseph I. Kapusta, Charles Gale, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press (2011)

    2011

  72. [80]

    J. M. Lattimer, & M. Prakash, 2004, Science,304, 5670, 536

    2004

  73. [81]

    Weber, 2005, Prog

    F. Weber, 2005, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.,54, 1, 193

    2005

  74. [82]

    M. E. Fisher, 1967, Rep. Prog. Phys.,30, 2, 615

    1967

  75. [83]

    Rehberg, S

    P. Rehberg, S. P. Klevansky, & J. H¨ufner, 1996, Phys. Rev. C, 53, 1, 410

    1996

  76. [84]

    Burrows, & J

    A. Burrows, & J. M. Lattimer, 1986, Astrophys. J,307, 178

    1986

  77. [85]

    Pal, & G

    S. Pal, & G. Chaudhuri, 2024, Phys. Rev. D,110, 12, 123021

    2024

  78. [86]

    M. G. Alford, S. Han, &M. Prakash, 2013, Phys. Rev. D,88, 8, 083013

    2013

  79. [87]

    D. E. Alvarez-Castillo, & D. B. Blaschke, 2017, Phys. Rev. C,96, 4, 045809

    2017

  80. [88]

    J. E. Christian, A. Zacchi, & J. Schaffner-Bielich, 2018, Eur. Phys. J. A,54, 2, 28

    2018

  81. [89]

    Monta ˜na, L

    G. Monta ˜na, L. Tol´os, M. Hanauske, et al. 2019, Phys. Rev. D, 99, 10, 103009

    2019

  82. [90]

    M. C. Miller, et al., Astrophys. J.887, L24 (2019)

    2019

  83. [91]

    T. E. Riley, et al., Astrophys. J.887, L21 (2019)

    2019

  84. [92]

    M. C. Miller, et al., Astrophys. J.918, L28 (2021)

    2021

  85. [93]

    T. E. Riley, et al., Astrophys. J.918, L27 (2021)

    2021

  86. [94]

    B. P. Abbott, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017)

    2017

  87. [95]

    B. P. Abbott, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 161101 (2018)

    2018

  88. [96]

    Laskos-Patkos, P

    P. Laskos-Patkos, P. S. Koliogiannis, A. Kanakis-Pegios, et al. 2022, Universe,8, 8, 395

    2022

  89. [97]

    P. S. Koliogiannis, & C. C. Moustakidis, 2021, Astrophys. J., 912, 1, 69

    2021

  90. [98]

    X. H. Wu, P. C. Chu, M. Ju, et al. 2025, Chinese Phys. C,49, 5, 054102

    2025

  91. [99]

    P. C. Chu, Y . Zhou, C. Chen, et al. 2020, J. Phys. G Nucl. Phys.,47, 8, 085201

    2020

  92. [100]

    P. C. Chu, Y . N. Wang, X. H. Li, et al. 2022, Phys. Rev. C, 105, 4, 045806

    2022

  93. [101]

    V ovchenko, B

    V . V ovchenko, B. B. Brandt, F. Cuteri, G. Endr ˝odi, F. Ha- jkarim, and J. Schaffner-Bielich 2021, Phys. Rev. L,126, 012701

    2021

  94. [102]

    Ferreira, E

    O. Ferreira, E. S. Fraga, M. Hippert, and J. Schaffner-Bielich, 2025, arXiv:2507.06518

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.