Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 47 references

The Missing Giant: Do FAST Spectroscopic Observations Reveal a Scarcity of Large Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Astronomical Environments?

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Giant PAHs are missing from radio spectra of three interstellar sources.

desk verdict The submitted full text is a different paper (MLLMRec); the PAH search exists only in the abstract, so the central upper-limit claim is unverifiable and the preprint should be desk-rejected. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.15302 v1 pith:3OZ4BFXU submitted 2025-08-21 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR

Yi Shao , Yong Zhang , Xu-Jia Ouyang , Chuan-Peng Zhang This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR
keywords largepolycyclicaromatichydrocarbonsunidentifiedinfraredemissionbandsFASTrotationalspectroscopymatchedfilterquasi-symmetricmoleculesNGC7027TMC-1
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to settle whether very large polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons—PAHs with 138 to 194 carbon atoms—are abundant enough in space to explain the unidentified infrared emission (UIE) bands, a set of infrared features observed for decades without a secure carrier. Using the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Radio Telescope (FAST), the authors searched for the characteristic rotational "comb" of quasi-symmetric PAHs in two prototypical UIE sources, NGC 7027 and TMC-1, plus the non-UIE carbon star IRC+10216 as a control. No such features were detected. From the non-detection they derived upper limits on the abundance of these large PAHs, and those limits fall below the values theoretical models predict. The paper therefore tentatively concludes that large PAHs are unlikely to be the primary carriers of the UIE bands, while cautioning that the abundance limits rest on simplifying, unvalidated assumptions.

What carries the argument

The search targets quasi-symmetric PAHs—large, roughly symmetric molecules whose near-degenerate rotational levels concentrate their emission into a regularly spaced comb of lines rather than a dense forest—in the decimeter band, where FAST is most sensitive. A matched filter is built from predicted line frequencies and relative intensities and slid across the spectra to co-add the comb coherently, boosting sensitivity over single-line searches. The non-detection is then converted to an abundance upper limit using assumed dipole moments, partition functions, and excitation temperatures. The matched filter plus FAST's collecting area is what lets a null result carry quantitative force.

What would settle it

A definitive detection of even one rotational line from a 138–194 carbon quasi-symmetric PAH in NGC 7027, TMC-1, or IRC+10216 at a level consistent with model abundances—or a laboratory measurement showing the predicted line positions are wrong—would overturn the scarcity conclusion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's claim is that, at FAST's sensitivity, quasi-symmetric PAHs containing 138 to 194 carbon atoms would have produced a detectable comb of rotational lines if they were present at the abundances that current theoretical models assign to UIE carriers; no such comb appears in NGC 7027, TMC-1, or IRC+10216. The non-detection translates, under simplifying assumptions, into column-density upper limits that sit below model predictions. If taken at face value, this means the class of large quasi-symmetric PAHs is not abundant enough to be the main source of the UIE bands, so the carrier must be sought among smaller PAHs, asymmetric PAHs, or other carbonaceous species.

Load-bearing premise

The abundance limits assume the rotational line frequencies, dipole moments, partition functions, and excitation conditions of these 138–194 carbon PAHs are known well enough that the matched filter would have seen the comb if the molecules were there at model-predicted abundances; the paper itself calls these assumptions simplifying and not empirically validated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Large quasi-symmetric PAHs with 138 to 194 carbon atoms are not present in NGC 7027, TMC-1, or IRC+10216 at the abundances UIE-carrier models require.
  • The UIE carrier must instead be smaller PAHs, asymmetric large PAHs, or a different carbonaceous material, narrowing the chemical search space.
  • Abundance limits from radio non-detections can constrain interstellar grain-growth and PAH-formation models that predict large molecules in carbon-rich outflows.
  • The same matched-filter strategy can be applied to deeper FAST integrations or other sources to push the limits lower or detect the comb.
  • IRC+10216, a non-UIE source, also shows no large-PAH comb, suggesting the scarcity is not tied only to the UIE phenomenon.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the assumed rotational line positions are even slightly off—the paper's own caveat—the matched filter would miss the comb and the scarcity claim would weaken; a laboratory rotational spectrum of a 138–194 carbon PAH would settle this directly.
  • The null result implicitly favors scenarios in which interstellar PAHs are processed down to smaller sizes rather than grown to very large sizes, and it makes searches for asymmetric large PAHs or fullerene-type carriers more attractive.
  • Stacking many FAST pointings, rather than three sources, could turn the upper limits into a statistically robust census of giant PAHs across different environments.
  • The method also demonstrates a template for using radio telescopes to search for other complex molecules whose rotational spectra are dense but quasi-regular.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper, as submitted under arXiv:2508.15302 (astro-ph.GA), presents an abstract claiming a FAST-based search for rotational transitions of quasi-symmetric PAHs with 138–194 carbon atoms toward NGC 7027, TMC-1, and IRC+10216. The abstract reports a non-detection and derives upper limits on the abundance of large PAHs, which are claimed to be lower than theoretical model predictions, tentatively suggesting that large PAHs may not be the primary carriers of the unidentified infrared emission bands. However, the full text of the submission is titled 'MLLMRec: A Preference Reasoning Paradigm with Graph Refinement for Multimodal Recommendation' (arXiv:2508.15304v2), a cs.IR paper on multimodal recommender systems. This full text contains no astronomical observations, no FAST data, no matched-filter implementation, no rotational line lists, no excitation analysis, and no abundance or column-density derivations. The central scientific claim of the abstract is therefore entirely unsupported by the manuscript body.

Significance. If the abstract's claim were substantiated, the result would be of substantial astrophysical interest: it would place new, sensitive upper limits on the abundance of large quasi-symmetric PAHs in three prototypical sources and would directly test a long-standing class of models for the carriers of the unidentified infrared bands. The non-detection itself is a plausible empirical result. However, the significance cannot be assessed from the submitted text, because the full paper provides none of the underlying data, methods, or calculations. The only quantitative statement, that the derived upper limits are below theoretical predictions, is explicitly conceded in the abstract to rest on 'simplifying assumptions which have not been empirically validated.' The manuscript as submitted does not allow a reader to check the line frequencies, dipole moments, partition functions, excitation temperatures, filling factors, or noise statistics that would convert a spectral non-detection into an abundance upper limit. Thus the paper's contribution is currently unverifiable and, in its present form, is not a complete scientific manuscript.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full text (all sections)] The submitted manuscript body is entirely the text of an unrelated cs.IR paper, 'MLLMRec: A Preference Reasoning Paradigm with Graph Refinement for Multimodal Recommendation.' It contains no astronomical observations, no FAST spectra, no matched-filter method, no PAH rotational line lists, no noise analysis, and no abundance/column-density derivations. The central claim in the abstract is therefore presented without any supporting methods or results. This is a load-bearing deficiency: the quantitative upper limits and the claimed tension with theoretical models cannot be checked, reproduced, or even located in the submitted text.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract concedes that the derived upper limits are based on 'simplifying assumptions which have not been empirically validated.' The conversion from a non-detection to an abundance upper limit requires knowledge of the rotational line frequencies, dipole moments, partition functions, and excitation conditions of quasi-symmetric PAHs with 138–194 carbon atoms, as well as source-specific parameters (distance, filling factor, excitation temperature). None of these inputs or their uncertainties are provided anywhere in the manuscript. The abstract's concluding statement that the upper limits are 'lower than the values predicted by theoretical models' is therefore unsupported by any quantitative derivation in the submitted text.
  3. [Full text, Section 5 (Experiments)] The experimental section of the manuscript reports results on Amazon product datasets (Baby, Sports, Clothing) for a recommender system, not on NGC 7027, TMC-1, or IRC+10216. There is no astronomical source modeling, no spectral coverage description, no sensitivity estimate, and no comparison with theoretical UIE-carrier predictions. The absence of these essential components means the central claim of the abstract is not merely difficult to verify—it is absent from the paper body.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states 'the world's most sensitive instrument operating in the decimeter-wavelength range' without a reference or specification of the relevant bandwidth and system temperature; this is unverifiable as written.
  2. [Abstract] The phrase 'quasi-symmetric PAHs' is not defined in the abstract or body; the reader cannot tell whether this refers to a specific point-group symmetry, a degree of dipole asymmetry, or a particular molecular structure class.
  3. [Full text, References] The reference list and acknowledgments belong to the recommender-systems manuscript and have no connection to the astronomical abstract; they should be removed or replaced if this is a submission error.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation is present in the submitted text; the body is an unrelated paper, and the abstract's claims are empirical but unverifiable rather than circular.

full rationale

The submitted manuscript is internally mismatched: the abstract describes FAST spectroscopic observations of large PAHs with 138–194 carbon atoms, while the full text is an unrelated cs.IR paper (MLLMRec) about multimodal recommendation. As a result, there is no derivational chain in the text that could be circular: no equations connect the non-detection to the derived abundance upper limits, and no line lists, dipole moments, partition functions, excitation models, or matched-filter details are presented. The abstract itself concedes that the upper limits rest on 'simplifying assumptions which have not been empirically validated' (Abstract). That is a serious limitation and a correctness risk—the claimed tension with theoretical model predictions is unverifiable—but it is not a circular reduction to the paper's own inputs, because the load-bearing evidence (the non-detection in FAST spectra) is empirical and independent of the conclusion. Under the instructed standard requiring a quoted equation or fitted parameter that reduces to the claimed result, no circular step can be exhibited. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities; the large PAHs in question are pre-existing proposed UIE carriers. The load-bearing unverified content is the set of assumed molecular spectroscopic and excitation parameters (free parameters, values not given in the abstract) and the domain assumptions that the targeted sources are representative and that the assumed comb pattern is the right template. Abstract-only review; the body text mismatch prevented a fuller audit.

free parameters (2)
  • Assumed rotational/spectroscopic parameters of quasi-symmetric PAHs (138-194 C) = not stated in abstract
    Line frequencies, dipole moments, and partition functions are needed to predict the comb spectrum and to convert non-detection into abundance upper limits; these come from theoretical models, not laboratory measurement.
  • Excitation and source-model assumptions (excitation temperature, filling factor, distance) = not stated in abstract
    A flux upper limit becomes an abundance upper limit only through assumed excitation conditions and source geometry; the abstract calls these simplifying assumptions that are empirically unvalidated.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Quasi-symmetric PAHs with 138-194 carbon atoms produce detectable comb-like rotational emission in FAST's band
    Underpins the matched filter search. If the true line frequencies or intensities differ from the assumed pattern, the search is blind. Invoked implicitly in the abstract's description of the search.
  • domain assumption NGC 7027 and TMC-1 are representative environments where large PAHs would be present if they are UIE carriers
    Sample selection is what lets the authors interpret absence as scarcity rather than wrong environment. Stated in the abstract's sample description.
  • standard math Matched filter detection statistics map cleanly to abundance upper limits
    Matched filter theory is standard signal processing; the non-standard part is the physical conversion, which is where the unvalidated assumptions enter.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Missing Giant: Do FAST Spectroscopic Observations Reveal a Scarcity of Large Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Astronomical Environments?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3OZ4BFXU

@misc{pith2026250815302,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Missing Giant: Do FAST Spectroscopic Observations Reveal a Scarcity of Large Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Astronomical Environments?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3OZ4BFXU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.15302}
}
read the original abstract

The search for large polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) with over 100 carbon atoms is crucial to resolving the origin of unidentified infrared emission (UIE) bands. These bands are commonly observed in nebulae and the interstellar medium, yet their spectroscopic assignment has remained unknown for decades. Using the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Radio Telescope (FAST), the world's most sensitive instrument operating in the decimeter-wavelength range, we conducted a search for rotational transitions of large, quasi-symmetric PAHs. Our sample included two prototypical UIE sources, NGC 7027 and TMC-1, along with a non-UIE source, IRC+10216, for comparison. A matched filter technique was employed to isolate comb-like spectral features from quasi-symmetric PAHs containing 138 to 194 carbon atoms in the FAST spectra. This method significantly enhanced detection sensitivity to these astrophysically critical molecular signatures. Although no such features were detected, we derived upper limits on the abundance of large PAHs based on simplifying assumptions. These upper limits are lower than the values predicted by theoretical models, which might tentatively suggest that large PAHs may not be the primary carriers of UIE bands. However, this conclusion should be treated as tentative, given that it rests on simplistic assumptions which have not been empirically validated.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Keqin Bao, Jizhi Zhang, Yang Zhang, Wenjie Wang, Fuli Feng, and Xiangnan He. 2023. TALLRec: An Effective and Efficient Tuning Framework to Align Large Language Model with Recommendation. InProceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 1007–1014

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Jie Chen, Haw-ren Fang, and Yousef Saad. 2009. Fast ApproximatekNN Graph Construction for High Dimensional Data via Recursive Lanczos Bisection.Journal of Machine Learning Research10 (2009), 1989–2012

    work page 2009

  3. [3]

    Yuzhuo Dang, Zhiqiang Pan, Xin Zhang, Wanyu Chen, Fei Cai, and Honghui Chen. 2025. Discrepancy Learning Guided Hierarchical Fusion Network for Multi-modal Recommendation.Knowledge-Based Systems317 (2025), 113496

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Yuxiao Duan, Xiang Zhao, and Hao Guo. 2025. Sentiment-aware cross-modal semantic interaction model for harmful meme detection.Decision Support Systems 196 (2025), 114509

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Yunfan Gao, Tao Sheng, Youlin Xiang, Yun Xiong, Haofen Wang, and Jiawei Zhang. 2023. Chat-REC: Towards Interactive and Explainable LLMs-Augmented Recommender System.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.14524(2023)

    arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Shijie Geng, Shuchang Liu, Zuohui Fu, Yingqiang Ge, and Yongfeng Zhang. 2022. Recommendation as Language Processing (RLP): A Unified Pretrain, Personalized Prompt & Predict Paradigm (P5). InProceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 299–315

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Zhiqiang Guo, Jianjun Li, Guohui Li, Chaoyang Wang, Si Shi, and Bin Ruan. 2024. LGMRec: Local and Global Graph Learning for Multimodal Recommendation. In Proceedingts of the 38th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 8454–8462

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. InProceedings of the 29th IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 770–778

    work page 2016

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    Ruining He and Julian J. McAuley. 2016. VBPR: Visual Bayesian Personalized Ranking from Implicit Feedback. InProceedings of the 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 144–150

    2016

  2. [10]

    Xiangnan He, Kuan Deng, Xiang Wang, Yan Li, Yong-Dong Zhang, and Meng Wang. 2020. LightGCN: Simplifying and Powering Graph Convolution Net- work for Recommendation. InProceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieva...

    2020

  3. [11]

    Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen

    Edward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen. 2022. LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models. InProceedings of the 10th International Conference on Learning Representations

    2022

  4. [12]

    Zheng Hu, Zhe Li, Ziyun Jiao, Satoshi Nakagawa, Jiawen Deng, Shimin Cai, Tao Zhou, and Fuji Ren. 2025. Bridging the User-side Knowledge Gap in Knowledge- aware Recommendations with Large Language Models. InProceedings of the 39th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 11799–11807

    2025

  5. [13]

    Yanbiao Ji, Dan Luo, Chang Liu, Shaokai Wu, Jing Tong, Qichen He, Deyi Ji, Hongtao Lu, and Yue Ding. 2025. Generating Negative Samples for Multi-Modal Recommendation. InProceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 6007–6016

    2025

  6. [14]

    Meng Jian, Ruoxi Li, Tuo Wang, Ge Shi, and Lifang Wu. 2026. Large multi- modal model-based intent prompting learning for multimedia recommendation. Information Fusion127 (2026), 103881

    2026

  7. [15]

    Kankanhalli

    Zhenyang Li, Fan Liu, Yinwei Wei, Zhiyong Cheng, Liqiang Nie, and Mohan S. Kankanhalli. 2024. Attribute-driven Disentangled Representation Learning for Multimodal Recommendation. InProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 9660–9669

    2024

  8. [16]

    Guojiao Lin, Zhen Meng, Dongjie Wang, Qingqing Long, Yuanchun Zhou, and Meng Xiao. 2024. GUME: Graphs and User Modalities Enhancement for Long- Tail Multimodal Recommendation. InProceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 1400–1409

    2024

  9. [17]

    Jianghao Lin, Xinyi Dai, Yunjia Xi, Weiwen Liu, Bo Chen, Hao Zhang, Yong Liu, Chuhan Wu, Xiangyang Li, Chenxu Zhu, Huifeng Guo, Yong Yu, Ruiming Tang, and Weinan Zhang. 2025. How Can Recommender Systems Benefit from Large Language Models: A Survey.ACM Transactions on Informati...

    2025

  10. [18]

    Shiqin Liu, Chaozhuo Li, Minjun Zhao, Litian Zhang, and Jiajun Bu. 2025. Modal- Sync: Synchronizing User Behavior with Multimodal Features for Multimodal Pre-training Recommendation. InProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2025. 2278–2287

    2025

  11. [19]

    Yaokun Liu, Xiaowang Zhang, Minghui Zou, and Zhiyong Feng. 2023. Co- occurrence embedding enhancement for long-tail problem in multi-interest rec- ommendation. InProceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. �������� � ���������� ��������� �������� ���� ����� ...

    2023

  12. [20]

    Fanshen Meng, Zhenhua Meng, Ru Jin, Rongheng Lin, and Budan Wu. 2025. DOGE: LLMs-Enhanced Hyper-Knowledge Graph Recommender for Multimodal Recommendation. InProceedings of the 39th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelli- gence. 12399–12407

    2025

  13. [21]

    Zongshen Mu, Yueting Zhuang, Jie Tan, Jun Xiao, and Siliang Tang. 2022. Learning Hybrid Behavior Patterns for Multimedia Recommendation. InProceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 376–384

    2022

  14. [22]

    Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych. 2019. Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks. InProceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 3980–3990

    2019

  15. [23]

    Steffen Rendle, Christoph Freudenthaler, Zeno Gantner, and Lars Schmidt-Thieme

  16. [24]

    Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. 2014. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition.arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556(2014)

    2014 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Zhongxiang Sun, Zihua Si, Xiaoxue Zang, Kai Zheng, Yang Song, Xiao Zhang, and Jun Xu. 2024. Large language models enhanced collaborative filtering. InPro- ceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2178–2188

    2024

  18. [26]

    Zhulin Tao, Xiaohao Liu, Yewei Xia, Xiang Wang, Lifang Yang, Xianglin Huang, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2023. Self-Supervised Learning for Multimedia Recommen- dation.IEEE Transactions on Multimedia25 (2023), 5107–5116

    2023

  19. [27]

    Laurens Van der Maaten and Geoffrey Hinton. 2008. Visualizing data using t-SNE. Journal of Machine Learning Research9, 11 (2008)

    2008

  20. [28]

    Qifan Wang, Yinwei Wei, Jianhua Yin, Jianlong Wu, Xuemeng Song, and Liqiang Nie. 2023. DualGNN: Dual Graph Neural Network for Multimedia Recommenda- tion.IEEE Transactions on Multimedia25 (2023), 1074–1084

    2023

  21. [29]

    Yan Wang, Zhixuan Chu, Xin Ouyang, Simeng Wang, Hongyan Hao, Yue Shen, Jinjie Gu, Siqiao Xue, James Zhang, Qing Cui, Longfei Li, Jun Zhou, and Sheng Li

  22. [30]

    Yancheng Wang, Ziyan Jiang, Zheng Chen, Fan Yang, Yingxue Zhou, Eunah Cho, Xing Fan, Yanbin Lu, Xiaojiang Huang, and Yingzhen Yang. 2024. RecMind: Large Language Model Powered Agent For Recommendation. InFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 4351–4364

    2024

  23. [31]

    Wei Wei, Chao Huang, Lianghao Xia, and Chuxu Zhang. 2023. Multi-Modal Self-Supervised Learning for Recommendation. InProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023. 790–800

    2023

  24. [32]

    Wei Wei, Xubin Ren, Jiabin Tang, Qinyong Wang, Lixin Su, Suqi Cheng, Junfeng Wang, Dawei Yin, and Chao Huang. 2024. LLMRec: Large Language Models with Graph Augmentation for Recommendation. InProceedings of the 17th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 806–815

    2024

  25. [33]

    Yinwei Wei, Xiang Wang, Liqiang Nie, Xiangnan He, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2020. Graph-Refined Convolutional Network for Multimedia Recommendation with Implicit Feedback. InProceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 3541–3549

    2020

  26. [34]

    Yinwei Wei, Xiang Wang, Liqiang Nie, Xiangnan He, Richang Hong, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2019. MMGCN: Multi-modal Graph Convolution Network for Personalized Recommendation of Micro-video. InProceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 1437–1445

    2019

  27. [35]

    Jinfeng Xu, Zheyu Chen, Wei Wang, Xiping Hu, Sang-Wook Kim, and Edith CH Ngai. 2025. COHESION: Composite graph convolutional network with dual-stage fusion for multimodal recommendation. InProceedings of the 48th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development i...

    2025

  28. [36]

    Jinfeng Xu, Zheyu Chen, Shuo Yang, Jinze Li, Hewei Wang, and Edith C. H. Ngai

  29. [37]

    Zixuan Yi, Xi Wang, Iadh Ounis, and Craig MacDonald. 2022. Multi-modal Graph Contrastive Learning for Micro-video Recommendation. InProceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 1807–1811

    2022

  30. [38]

    Jun Yin, Zhengxin Zeng, Mingzheng Li, Hao Yan, Chaozhuo Li, Weihao Han, Jianjin Zhang, Ruochen Liu, Hao Sun, Weiwei Deng, Feng Sun, Qi Zhang, Shirui Pan, and Senzhang Wang. 2025. Unleash LLMs Potential for Sequential Recom- mendation by Coordinating Dual Dynamic Index Mechanis...

    2025

  31. [39]

    Penghang Yu, Zhiyi Tan, Guanming Lu, and Bing-Kun Bao. 2023. Multi-View Graph Convolutional Network for Multimedia Recommendation. InProceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 6576–6585

    2023

  32. [40]

    Zhenrui Yue, Sara Rabhi, Gabriel de Souza Pereira Moreira, Dong Wang, and Even Oldridge. 2023. LlamaRec: Two-Stage Recommendation using Large Language Models for Ranking.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.02089(2023)

    2023 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Jinghao Zhang, Yanqiao Zhu, Qiang Liu, Shu Wu, Shuhui Wang, and Liang Wang

  34. [42]

    Xin Zhou. 2023. MMRec: Simplifying Multimodal Recommendation. InACM Multimedia Asia Workshops. 6:1–6:2

    2023

  35. [43]

    Xin Zhou and Zhiqi Shen. 2023. A Tale of Two Graphs: Freezing and Denoising Graph Structures for Multimodal Recommendation. InProceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 935–943

    2023

  36. [2009]

    InProceedings of the 25th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence

    BPR: Bayesian Personalized Ranking from Implicit Feedback. InProceedings of the 25th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. 452–461

  37. [2021]

    InProceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia

    Mining Latent Structures for Multimedia Recommendation. InProceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 3872–3880

  38. [2024]

    InProceedings of the 38th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

    LLMRG: Improving Recommendations through Large Language Model Rea- soning Graphs. InProceedings of the 38th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 19189–19196

  39. [2025]

    InProceedings of the 39th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

    MENTOR: Multi-level Self-supervised Learning for Multimodal Recom- mendation. InProceedings of the 39th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 12908–12917

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.