pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.18560 · v1 · submitted 2025-08-25 · ⚛️ physics.soc-ph

Thermodynamics of Innovation: A Statistical Mechanics Framework of Social Adoption

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 20:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.soc-ph
keywords innovation adoptionstatistical mechanicsthermodynamic frameworkGompertz distributionMaxwell-Boltzmann distributionenergy landscapeeffective potentialsocio-technical systems
0
0 comments X

The pith

Mapping empirical adoption distributions to canonical ensembles yields effective energy landscapes and Lagrangians that govern innovation spread and decline.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a thermodynamic framework for innovation adoption by starting with a mathematical model fitted to empirical data and constructing a canonical ensemble. The equilibrium distributions from this ensemble take Gompertz-like and Maxwell-Boltzmann-like forms, which the authors use to reverse-engineer an associated energy landscape. From the landscape they define an effective potential and derive a dynamical Lagrangian, producing a field theory for the full cycle of early suppression, peak adoption, and late decline. A sympathetic reader would care because the approach supplies physical interpretations for effective temperature, entropy, and equilibrium points in social systems, revealing hybrid thermodynamic-statistical behavior without introducing separate social mechanisms.

Core claim

The authors claim that a mathematical model for an adoption distribution fitted to empirical data can be mapped onto a canonical ensemble whose equilibrium distribution produces Gompertz-like and Maxwell-Boltzmann-like shapes. Reverse-engineering the energy landscape from this ensemble defines an effective potential, from which a dynamical Lagrangian is derived. The resulting field theory reproduces emergent behaviors in socio-technical systems from early suppression through peak dynamics to late decline, while permitting direct interpretation of effective temperature, entropy, and equilibrium points as hybrid thermodynamic-statistical signatures.

What carries the argument

The canonical ensemble built from the empirically fitted adoption distribution, which supplies the equilibrium form used to reverse-engineer the energy landscape, effective potential, and dynamical Lagrangian.

If this is right

  • Adoption curves correspond to equilibrium distributions whose shape is controlled by an effective potential.
  • Effective temperature and entropy become calculable quantities that characterize the state of a socio-technical system.
  • The Lagrangian formulation permits dynamical simulation of transitions across suppression, peak, and decline phases.
  • Hybrid thermodynamic-statistical signatures emerge naturally, allowing standard statistical-mechanics tools to be applied to innovation data.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • External policy or marketing interventions could be represented as controlled changes to the effective potential or temperature.
  • The same construction might be tested on other diffusion processes such as product sales or idea propagation to check for consistent energy landscapes.
  • Longitudinal datasets could be used to verify whether the derived Lagrangian reproduces observed time evolution beyond the initial fit.
  • Non-equilibrium extensions might connect this equilibrium picture to real-time fluctuations in adoption rates.

Load-bearing premise

A mathematical model fitted to adoption data can be mapped directly onto a canonical ensemble that yields a physically meaningful energy landscape without extra social mechanisms or further validation.

What would settle it

Fit the model to the rising phase of a new innovation's adoption curve, then check whether the derived energy landscape and equilibrium distribution correctly predict the observed timing and shape of the subsequent peak and decline; a clear mismatch would falsify the direct mapping.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.18560 by Carlo R. daCunha, Guilherme S. Y. Giardini.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Effective potential V (ω) = βm ω + βm σ e−ω/σ − α ln ω for various values of α, with fixed parameters β = 1.0, m = 1.0, and σ = 2.0. Increasing α shifts the position of the global minimum ω∗ to larger values, corresponding in the innovation model to stronger entropic reinforcement effects in the adoption dynamics. To describe the deterministic relaxation of an innovation within this potential landscape, we… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Phase–space representation of the system ¨ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Adoption curves extracted from Google Trends [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Adoption curves of four representative papers exh [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Adoption curves of four representative papers exh [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Heat capacity (red, left axis) and susceptibility [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Heat capacity (red, left axis) and susceptibility [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We develop a thermodynamic framework for modeling innovation adoption and abandonment dynamics using statistical mechanics. Starting from a mathematical model for an adoption distribution that fits empirically obtained date, we construct a canonical ensemble whose equilibrium distribution yields Gompertz-like and Maxwell-Boltzmann-like shapes. By reverse engineering the associated energy landscape, we define an effective potential and derive a dynamical Lagrangian formulation. The resulting field theory captures key features of emergent behaviors in socio-technical systems, from early suppression to peak dynamics and late decline. We interpret effective temperature, entropy, and equilibrium points, and show how these systems exhibit hybrid thermodynamic-statistical signatures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a thermodynamic framework for modeling innovation adoption and abandonment dynamics using statistical mechanics. Starting from a mathematical model for an adoption distribution fitted to empirical data, it constructs a canonical ensemble whose equilibrium distribution yields Gompertz-like and Maxwell-Boltzmann-like shapes. By reverse-engineering the associated energy landscape, the authors define an effective potential and derive a dynamical Lagrangian formulation. The resulting field theory is claimed to capture key features of emergent behaviors in socio-technical systems, from early suppression to peak dynamics and late decline, while interpreting effective temperature, entropy, and equilibrium points to show hybrid thermodynamic-statistical signatures.

Significance. If the central mapping were shown to be independently grounded and predictive, the work could offer a novel bridge between statistical mechanics and innovation diffusion models, providing a unified way to interpret adoption trajectories through thermodynamic quantities. The explicit construction of a Lagrangian from an effective potential and the focus on hybrid signatures represent a potentially useful formalization, though its value hinges on moving beyond re-description of fitted static distributions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and opening construction paragraphs: the equilibrium distribution is posited to match the fitted adoption model by defining an effective potential V such that P ~ exp(-V/T); this step is formally always possible but renders the subsequent energy landscape and Lagrangian dependent on the input distribution parameters rather than derived from micro-level social rules.
  2. [Dynamical formulation] Section on dynamical Lagrangian formulation: no explicit derivation or numerical check is provided showing that the field theory reproduces observed time-dependent adoption and abandonment trajectories (as opposed to merely recovering the static histogram used to define the ensemble).
  3. [Thermodynamic interpretation] Interpretation of effective temperature, entropy, and equilibrium points: these quantities are extracted from the reverse-engineered potential, yet the manuscript supplies no independent test against measurable social observables or out-of-sample predictions that would establish them as more than reparameterizations of the original fit.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Model setup] Clarify the precise functional form of the initial adoption distribution (Gompertz or Maxwell-Boltzmann) and the fitting procedure used on the empirical data.
  2. [Results] Add a dedicated validation subsection comparing the predicted dynamics to time-series adoption data not used in the initial fit.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major point below, indicating where we agree and what revisions we have made or will make to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and opening construction paragraphs: the equilibrium distribution is posited to match the fitted adoption model by defining an effective potential V such that P ~ exp(-V/T); this step is formally always possible but renders the subsequent energy landscape and Lagrangian dependent on the input distribution parameters rather than derived from micro-level social rules.

    Authors: We agree that constructing an effective potential to match any given distribution is formally always possible and that the resulting landscape and Lagrangian inherit the parameters of the fitted adoption model. Our choice of distribution is grounded in its empirical fit to innovation adoption data rather than being arbitrary, and the thermodynamic mapping is intended as an effective description that enables new interpretations of suppression, peak, and decline phases. We have revised the abstract and the opening paragraphs of the construction section to explicitly state that this is an effective potential motivated by data fitting, not a derivation from underlying micro-level social interaction rules. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Dynamical formulation] Section on dynamical Lagrangian formulation: no explicit derivation or numerical check is provided showing that the field theory reproduces observed time-dependent adoption and abandonment trajectories (as opposed to merely recovering the static histogram used to define the ensemble).

    Authors: The referee is correct that the manuscript presents the Lagrangian derived from the effective potential but does not include explicit time-dependent derivations or numerical integrations that recover observed adoption trajectories. The formulation ensures consistency with the equilibrium distribution by construction, yet direct dynamical validation against time-series data is absent. We have added a new subsection with analytical arguments and preliminary numerical examples demonstrating that the field equations can generate trajectories exhibiting early suppression, peak adoption, and late decline consistent with the static distribution. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Thermodynamic interpretation] Interpretation of effective temperature, entropy, and equilibrium points: these quantities are extracted from the reverse-engineered potential, yet the manuscript supplies no independent test against measurable social observables or out-of-sample predictions that would establish them as more than reparameterizations of the original fit.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the effective temperature, entropy, and equilibrium points are obtained directly from the reverse-engineered potential and that the manuscript does not yet provide independent empirical tests or out-of-sample predictions. The current contribution centers on constructing the framework and identifying hybrid thermodynamic-statistical signatures. We have expanded the discussion section to outline concrete directions for future validation, including possible relations between effective temperature and observable quantities such as network density or adoption barriers. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Reverse-engineering effective energy from fitted adoption distribution renders thermodynamic framework tautological

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Abstract]
    "Starting from a mathematical model for an adoption distribution that fits empirically obtained date, we construct a canonical ensemble whose equilibrium distribution yields Gompertz-like and Maxwell-Boltzmann-like shapes. By reverse engineering the associated energy landscape, we define an effective potential and derive a dynamical Lagrangian formulation."

    The canonical ensemble is posited so that its equilibrium distribution exactly reproduces the input fitted adoption model; the effective potential V is then reverse-engineered via P ~ exp(-V/T). This step is formally always possible but tautological: the derived energy landscape and Lagrangian are defined in terms of the fitted distribution parameters rather than obtained from independent social interaction rules or external validation.

full rationale

The paper begins with a fitted mathematical model for the adoption distribution and explicitly constructs a canonical ensemble whose equilibrium measure is forced to match that distribution by defining the effective potential accordingly. This makes the subsequent energy landscape, Lagrangian, and thermodynamic interpretations (temperature, entropy, equilibrium points) dependent on the input fit by construction. No independent micro-level social rules or out-of-sample dynamical validation is provided to ground the mapping, so the claimed statistical-mechanics framework reduces to a re-description of the static histogram rather than a derivation from first principles.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 2 invented entities

The framework rests on fitting an empirical adoption model and assuming it corresponds to a canonical ensemble; free parameters enter via the initial distribution fit, while the effective potential and temperature are derived quantities rather than independently measured.

free parameters (1)
  • adoption distribution parameters
    The mathematical model for the adoption distribution is stated to fit empirical data, introducing parameters that are adjusted to match observations.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Social adoption dynamics can be represented by the equilibrium distribution of a canonical ensemble in statistical mechanics
    Invoked when constructing the ensemble whose distribution yields Gompertz-like and Maxwell-Boltzmann shapes.
invented entities (2)
  • effective potential no independent evidence
    purpose: Energy landscape obtained by reverse engineering from the equilibrium distribution
    Introduced to enable the Lagrangian formulation; no independent falsifiable prediction is given.
  • effective temperature no independent evidence
    purpose: Thermodynamic interpretation of social openness or activity level
    Interpreted from the ensemble; no external calibration or measurement provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5627 in / 1650 out tokens · 74232 ms · 2026-05-18T20:32:37.723307+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bass, Kent Gordon, Teresa L

    Frank M. Bass, Kent Gordon, Teresa L. Ferguson, and Mary L ou Githens. DI- RECTV: Forecasting Diffusion of a New Technology Prior to Prod uct Launch. Interfaces, 31(3 supplement):S82–S93, June 2001

  2. [2]

    Pre-launch new product demand forecasting using the Bass model: A statistical and m achine learning-based approach

    Hakyeon Lee, Sang Gook Kim, Hyun-woo Park, and Pilsung Ka ng. Pre-launch new product demand forecasting using the Bass model: A statistical and m achine learning-based approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change , 86:49–64, July 2014

  3. [3]

    The choice of Bass model coefficients to forecast diffusion for innovative products: An empirical investigation for ne w automotive technologies

    J´ erˆ ome Massiani and Andreas Gohs. The choice of Bass model coefficients to forecast diffusion for innovative products: An empirical investigation for ne w automotive technologies. Research in Transportation Economics, 50:17–28, August 2015

  4. [4]

    An estimation approach for the influential–imitator diffusion

    Ringo Thomas Tchouya, Stefano Nasini, and Sophie Dabo-N iang. An estimation approach for the influential–imitator diffusion. Computers & Operations Research , 159:106315, Nov 2023

  5. [5]

    A novel Bass-type model for product life cyc le quantification using aggregate market data

    Xuezhen Guo. A novel Bass-type model for product life cyc le quantification using aggregate market data. International Journal of Production Economics , 158(C):208–216, 2014

  6. [6]

    Predicting product information diffusion for sustainable quality manag ement in industry 4.0: An improved Bass model approach

    Zhongya Han, Xiangtang Chen, Kepao Miao, Xiaoxiang Wang , and Qinlin Li. Predicting product information diffusion for sustainable quality manag ement in industry 4.0: An improved Bass model approach. Scientific Reports, 15(1):25989, Aug 2025

  7. [7]

    Idea engines: A unified theory of innovation and obsolescence from markets and genetic evolution to scie nce

    Edward Lee, Chris Kempes, and Geoffrey West. Idea engines: A unified theory of innovation and obsolescence from markets and genetic evolution to scie nce. SSRN Electronic Journal , 3 2022

  8. [8]

    Han L. J. van der Maas, Jonas Dalege, and Lourens Waldorp. The polarization within and across individuals: The hierarchical ising opinion mod el. Journal of Complex Networks , 8(2):cnaa010, Apr 2020

  9. [9]

    Ising model on clustered networks: A model for opinion dynamics

    Simone Baldassarri, Anna Gallo, Vanessa Jacquier, and A lessandro Zocca. Ising model on clustered networks: A model for opinion dynamics. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 623:128811, Aug 2023

  10. [10]

    Lindner, Tuan Minh Pham, Rudolf Han el, and Stefan Thurner

    Jan Korbel, Simon D. Lindner, Tuan Minh Pham, Rudolf Han el, and Stefan Thurner. Homophily-Based Social Group Formation in a Spin Glass Self -Assembly Framework. Physical Review Letters, 130(5):057401, Jan 2023. 18

  11. [11]

    Macy, Boleslaw K

    Michael W. Macy, Boleslaw K. Szymanski, and Janusz A. Ho /suppress lyst. The Ising model celebrates a century of interdisciplinary contributions. npj Complexity , 1(1):10, Jul 2024

  12. [12]

    Limits of predicti ons in thermodynamic systems: A review

    Robert Marsland and Jeremy England. Limits of predicti ons in thermodynamic systems: A review. Reports on Progress in Physics , 81(1):016601, November 2017

  13. [13]

    Vargo, Melissa Archpru Akaka, and Heiko Wiel and

    Stephen L. Vargo, Melissa Archpru Akaka, and Heiko Wiel and. Rethinking the process of diffusion in innovation: A service-ecosystems and instituti onal perspective. Journal of Business Research, 116:526–534, August 2020

  14. [14]

    G. S.Y. Giardini and C. R. da Cunha. Chain reaction of ide as: Can radioactive decay predict technological innovation? Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , 654:130132, 11 2024

  15. [15]

    Life-cycle consumption and hyperbolic discount functions

    David Laibson. Life-cycle consumption and hyperbolic discount functions. European Economic Review, 42(3):861–871, May 1998

  16. [16]

    Everett M. Rogers. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition . Simon and Schuster, August 2003

  17. [17]

    G. E. Uhlenbeck and L. S. Ornstein. On the theory of the Br ownian motion. Physical Review, 36(5):823–841, September 1930

  18. [18]

    Introduction to Econophysics : Contemporary Approaches with Python Simulations

    Carlo Requi˜ ao da Cunha. Introduction to Econophysics : Contemporary Approaches with Python Simulations. Introduction to Econophysics , October 2021

  19. [19]

    On the nature of the function expres sive of the law of human mortality, and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingenci es

    Benjamin Gompertz. On the nature of the function expres sive of the law of human mortality, and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingenci es. In a letter to Francis Baily, Esq. F. R. S. &c. By Benjamin Gompertz, Esq. F. R. S. Abstracts of the Papers Printed in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of Lond on, 2:252–253, January 1997

  20. [20]

    J. C. Maxwell. Illustrations of the dynamical theory of gases. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science , 20(130):21–37, July 1860

  21. [21]

    Weitere studien ¨ uber das w¨ armegleichgewicht unter gasmolek¨ ulen

    Ludwig Boltzmann. Weitere studien ¨ uber das w¨ armegleichgewicht unter gasmolek¨ ulen. In S. G. Brush, editor, Kinetische Theorie II: Irreversible Prozesse Einf¨ uhrung und Originaltexte, pages 115–225. Vieweg+Teubner Verlag, Wiesbaden, 1970

  22. [22]

    A. L. (Arthur Lyon) Sir Bowley. Elements of Statistics . London : P. S. King, 1901

  23. [23]

    Da Cunha

    Carlo Requi˜ ao. Da Cunha. Machine Learning for the Physical Sciences : Fundamentals a nd Prototyping with Julia . CRC Press, 2024

  24. [24]

    B. L. Altshuler, D. Khmel’nitzkii, A. I. Larkin, and P. A . Lee. Magnetoresistance and Hall effect in a disordered two-dimensional electron gas. Physical Review B , 22(11):5142–5153, December 1980

  25. [25]

    Vinay Ambegaokar, B. I. Halperin, David R. Nelson, and E ric D. Siggia. Dynamics of superfluid films. Physical Review B , 21(5):1806–1826, March 1980

  26. [26]

    Brecher and L

    C. Brecher and L. A. Riseberg. Laser-induced line-narr owing of eu 3+ fluorescence in fluo- roberyllate glass: Site-dependent spectroscopic propert ies and their structural implications. Physical Review B , 21(6):2607–2618, March 1980. 19

  27. [27]

    T. P. Cheng and Ling-Fong Li. Neutrino masses, mixings, and oscillations in SU(2)\ ifmmode\ times\ else\ texttimes\ fi{}U(1) models of electroweak interactions. Physical Review D , 22(11):2860–2868, December 1980

  28. [28]

    Low-temperature p roperties of the random Heisen- berg antiferromagnetic chain

    Chandan Dasgupta and Shang-keng Ma. Low-temperature p roperties of the random Heisen- berg antiferromagnetic chain. Physical Review B , 22(3):1305–1319, August 1980

  29. [29]

    Z. Hashin. Failure Criteria for Unidirectional Fiber C omposites. Journal of Applied Mechanics , 47(2):329–334, June 1980

  30. [30]

    Keller and Michael Miksis

    Joseph B. Keller and Michael Miksis. Bubble oscillatio ns of large amplitude. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America , 68(2):628–633, August 1980

  31. [31]

    B. M. Klein. Linear-combination-of-atomic-orbitals -coherent-potential-approximation studies of carbon vacancies in the substoichiometric refractory mo nocarbides nbc x, tac x, and hfc x. Physical Review B , 22(4):1946–1966, August 1980

  32. [32]

    Cross-Coupled Biaxial Computer Control f or Manufacturing Systems

    Yoram Koren. Cross-Coupled Biaxial Computer Control f or Manufacturing Systems. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control , 102(4):265–272, December 1980

  33. [33]

    E. A. Kraut, R. W. Grant, J. R. Waldrop, and S. P. Kowalczy k. Precise Determination of the Valence-Band Edge in X-Ray Photoemission Spectra: Ap plication to Measurement of Semiconductor Interface Potentials. Physical Review Letters , 44(24):1620–1623, June 1980

  34. [34]

    Langreth and John P

    David C. Langreth and John P. Perdew. Theory of nonunifo rm electronic systems. I. Analysis of the gradient approximation and a generalization that works . Physical Review B , 21(12):5469– 5493, June 1980

  35. [35]

    J. C. Le Guillou and J. Zinn-Justin. Critical exponents from field theory. Physical Review B , 21(9):3976–3998, May 1980

  36. [36]

    Magg and Ch

    M. Magg and Ch. Wetterich. Neutrino mass problem and gau ge hierarchy. Physics Letters B , 94(1):61–64, July 1980

  37. [37]

    Maradudin and Paul Mazur

    Alexei A. Maradudin and Paul Mazur. Effects of surface rou ghness on the van der Waals force between macroscopic bodies. Physical Review B , 22(4):1677–1686, August 1980

  38. [38]

    Mizushima, P.C

    K. Mizushima, P.C. Jones, P.J. Wiseman, and J.B. Gooden ough. LixCoO2 (0. Materials Research Bulletin, 15(6):783–789, June 1980

  39. [39]

    M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov. Can c onfinement ensure natural CP invariance of strong interactions? Nuclear Physics B , 166(3):493–506, April 1980

  40. [40]

    W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger. Soliton excita tions in polyacetylene. Physical Review B , 22(4):2099–2111, August 1980

  41. [41]

    W. J. Wiscombe. Improved Mie scattering algorithms. Applied Optics , 19(9):1505–1509, May 1980

  42. [42]

    The COVID-19 social media infodemic

    Matteo Cinelli, Walter Quattrociocchi, Alessandro Ga leazzi, Carlo Michele Valensise, Emanuele Brugnoli, Ana Lucia Schmidt, Paola Zola, Fabiana Z ollo, and Antonio Scala. The COVID-19 social media infodemic. Scientific Reports , 10(1):16598, October 2020. 20

  43. [43]

    Gianfranco Spiteri, James Fielding, Michaela Diercke , Christine Campese, Vincent Enouf, Alexandre Gaymard, Antonino Bella, Paola Sognamiglio, Mar ia Jos´ e Sierra Moros, Anto- nio Nicolau Riutort, Yulia V. Demina, Romain Mahieu, Markku Broas, Malin Bengn´ er, Silke Buda, Julia Schilling, Laurent Filleul, Agn` es Lepoutre, C hristine Saura, Alexandra Mail...

  44. [44]

    William E. Becker. Review of Information Rules: A Strat egic Guide to the Network Economy. The Journal of Economic Education , 30(2):189–190, 1999

  45. [45]

    Modeling and predicting the growth and d eath of membership-based websites

    Bruno Ribeiro. Modeling and predicting the growth and d eath of membership-based websites. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wid e Web , WWW ’14, pages 653–664, New York, NY, USA, April 2014. Association for Comp uting Machinery. 21