Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 1 cited by

On the asymptotic limit for the dynamic isotropic-nematic phase transition with anisotropic elasticity

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For anisotropic elasticity $L\in(-3/2,0)$, the Landau-de Gennes flow has a sharp-interface limit: mean-curvature motion with strong anchoring of the director field.

desk verdict Rigorous-looking anisotropic sharp interface limit, but the approximate-solution construction has a real existence gap; deserves refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.18800 v1 pith:VJJ2IWHF submitted 2025-08-26 math.AP

Huan Dong , Siqi Ren , Wei Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35B2535K5535Q3582D30
keywords Landau-deGennesisotropic-nematicphasetransitionsharpinterfacelimitmatchedasymptoticexpansionsanisotropicelasticitymeancurvatureflowstronganchoringspectralgapestimate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that the diffuse Landau-de Gennes description of an isotropic-nematic interface has a sharp-interface limit when the elastic anisotropy parameter $L$ lies in $(-3/2,0)$. In the limit, the interface moves by mean curvature, the order parameter is zero in the isotropic phase and uniaxial in the nematic phase, and the director field satisfies the Oseen-Frank gradient-flow equation with strong anchoring at the interface. The proof constructs approximate solutions to arbitrarily high order and proves a uniform spectral lower bound that turns the formal expansion into a quantitative convergence statement: an initial error of order $\varepsilon^{18}$ (in the paper's weighted energy) remains of that order up to time $T$. This establishes, in a dynamical setting, a surface-tension claim about isotropic-nematic interfaces that goes back to 1971.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a matched asymptotic expansion whose inner profile is the heteroclinic solution $Q_0(z)=s(z)(nn-\frac13 I)$ with $s(z)=\frac12(1+\tanh(\gamma z/2))$ and $\gamma=(1+2L/3)^{-1/2}$. Around this profile, the proof establishes a uniform spectral lower bound for the linearized operator $H_{Q^K}$: for every traceless symmetric $Q\in H^1$, $\int |\nabla Q|^2 - L\int |\nabla\cdot Q|^2 + \varepsilon^{-2}\int H_{Q^K}Q:Q \le C\int |Q|^2$, with $C$ independent of $\varepsilon$. The decisive step is a div-curl decomposition $|\nabla Q|^2 = \frac32|\nabla\cdot Q|^2 + \frac14|T(Q)|^2 + \cdots$, followed by a basis decomposition and a change of coordinates that reduce the tensor spectral problem to two scalar one-dimensional operators $G_0,G_1$ plus singular product terms; coercivity and spectral gap estimates for those scalar operators close the energy estimate.

What would settle it

Compute numerically the lowest eigenvalues of the scalar operators $G_0$ and $G_1$ defined around (6.48) for a fixed $L\in(-3/2,0)$ on a sequence of shrinking intervals $\varepsilon\to0$; if the second eigenvalue of either operator is not bounded below by a positive constant independent of $\varepsilon$, the spectral lower bound (1.9) fails and the error estimate collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.3: for any smooth solution $(\Gamma,n)$ of the limit system (1.6) on $[0,T]$, a solution $Q^\varepsilon$ of the Landau-de Gennes flow that starts within $\varepsilon^{18}$ of the matched asymptotic solution $Q^K$ stays within that distance for all later times. Consequently, as $\varepsilon\to0$, the tensor field converges to the sharp-interface system: $Q=0$ in the isotropic region, $Q=s_+(nn-\frac13 I)$ with the director $n$ obeying $(2s_+^2\partial_t n+h)\times n=0$, and $n=\nabla d$ on the interface, with $d$ the signed distance function and the interface evolving by $V=\sigma\kappa$. The result upgrades a formal derivation for anisotropic elasticity into a rigorous stability theorem and replaces the Neumann-type boundary condition of the isotropic case by strong anchoring.

Load-bearing premise

The theorem assumes a smooth solution of the limit system exists on the whole time interval $[0,T]$; if the interface develops a curvature singularity before $T$, the expansion and the convergence proof stop at the first singularity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For $L\in(-3/2,0)$ and well-prepared data, solutions of the Landau-de Gennes flow (1.3) converge to the sharp-interface system (1.6) on the whole smooth-existence interval $[0,T]$.
  • The convergence is quantitative: the weighted energy $E(Q^\varepsilon-Q^K)$ stays at order $\varepsilon^{18}$, so the interface profile is captured at that precision.
  • The interface speed is $V=\sigma\kappa$ with $\sigma$ determined by the elastic constants, so the surface tension predicted for anisotropic elasticity is realized dynamically, not only statically.
  • In the nematic bulk the limit director obeys $(2s_+^2\partial_t n+h)\times n=0$, the Oseen-Frank analogue of harmonic map heat flow, with the strong anchoring boundary condition $n=\nabla d$ replacing Neumann conditions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method should carry over to other elliptic differential operators with a scalar heteroclinic profile whenever the reduced one-dimensional operators have a uniform spectral gap; the proof's real content is that gap, not the specific liquid-crystal structure.
  • One can test the sharpness of the $k=9$ power by tracking the constants: the argument likely yields a similar statement for any $k\ge9$ order term, so the limitation is technical rather than structural.
  • Near $L\to -3/2$, the profile width $\gamma^{-1}$ diverges, so the interface layer is no longer thin; a separate scaling would be needed, suggesting that convergence may fail or require a rescaled limit at that endpoint.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper studies the sharp-interface limit, as ε→0, of the Landau–de Gennes gradient flow (1.3) for liquid crystals with anisotropic elasticity parameter L∈(-3/2,0). The claimed limit is the two-phase system (1.6): the interface moves by mean curvature, Q=0 in the isotropic phase, Q=s_+(nn-I/3) in the nematic phase, and the director n satisfies (2s_+^2∂_t n + h)×n=0 with the strong anchoring condition n=∇d on the interface. The authors state three main results: existence of approximate solutions to arbitrary order (Theorem 1.1), a uniform spectral lower bound for the linearized operator around the approximate solution (Theorem 1.2), and a nonlinear stability estimate with error O(ε^{2k}) for k=9 (Theorem 1.3). The proof strategy combines matched outer/inner asymptotic expansions with a div-curl decomposition and a reduction of the spectral estimate to scalar one-dimensional operators. The paper is technically ambitious and contains many detailed estimates, but the current version has a load-bearing gap in the construction of the approximate solutions, because the solvability of the coupled parabolic systems at each order is asserted rather than proved.

Significance. If the theorems are correct, the paper would be a substantial contribution: it would rigorously justify an anisotropic sharp-interface limit with strong anchoring, extending the isotropic results of Fei–Wang–Zhang–Zhang [21] and the matrix-valued Allen–Cahn analysis of Fei–Lin–Wang–Zhang [19], and it would verify a dynamical version of de Gennes's claim on isotropic–nematic interfacial tension. The technical machinery is impressive: matched asymptotic expansions to arbitrary order, spectral gap estimates for the operators G0 and G1, endpoint L∞ estimates, and a weighted nonlinear energy estimate. However, the existence of the approximate solution QK is not fully established because the coupled parabolic system (4.10) is not solved in Sections 4.2–4.3. Since Theorem 1.3 uses QK with K=10, this gap affects the central convergence claim. With a complete fixed-point argument, the paper would be a valuable and publishable contribution.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.2.1, Step 4; Eqs. (4.1)–(4.5)] The construction of V1 is incomplete. The functions q1,1 and q1,2 are defined by solving the nonlinear parabolic system (4.1) with Dirichlet boundary conditions (4.2)–(4.3) that depend on d1, while d1 is then supposed to solve (4.5), whose right-hand side depends on q1,1 and q1,2. Step 4 only states that the map P:d1↦(q1,1,q1,2) is bounded from L2(0,T;H1(S2)) to L2(0,T;H^{1/2}(S2)) and then concludes 'Thus, there exists a solution d1'. Boundedness of P does not imply existence of a fixed point; the argument needs continuity, compactness or a priori estimates, and a fixed-point theorem. Without d1 and q1,i, the inner coefficients s1,i and hence Q1 are not constructed, so the base profile QK in Theorem 1.1 is not defined.
  2. [Section 4.3.1, Eq. (4.10)] For k≥1 the induction step is asserted rather than proved. After writing the coupled system (4.10), the text says 'We can obtain Q^J_{k+1} in Ω+ and d_{k+1} on Γ by the system (4.10)'. This system is genuinely coupled: d_{k+1} appears in the Dirichlet boundary condition for q_{k+1,1} and q_{k+1,2}, while the equation for d_{k+1} has a right-hand side depending on ∇d_{k+1} and on the q's. No fixed-point argument, function-space setting, or regularity theory is provided. Since Theorem 1.1 promises arbitrary K and Theorem 1.3 uses K=10, this missing induction step is load-bearing and prevents the current manuscript from establishing Theorem 1.1 as written.
  3. [Theorem 1.2 and Lemmas 6.6–6.8] The spectral lower bound is a central ingredient, but its proof relies on Lemmas 6.6, 6.7, and 6.8 as black boxes imported from [19] and [21]. In particular, Lemma 6.7 contains an unspecified positive weight ω that 'decays exponentially to zero at +∞'; in the proof of Lemma 6.18 the weight is later chosen as ω = |d/ds κ(ξ_{1,ε}) s_{1,1}|^2 |ξ_{0,ε}|, but the paper does not verify that this choice is positive, bounded, and exponentially decaying on the interval I, nor that the orthogonality condition in Lemma 6.7 is satisfied. The authors should state the precise hypotheses of the imported lemmas and verify them explicitly for the weight actually used.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Section 1.3, Theorem 1.1] The phrase 'there exits an approximate solution' should read 'there exists an approximate solution'; also the quantifier 'for any K ∈ Z+' should be 'for any K ∈ N' if Z+ denotes the positive integers.
  2. [References [10] and [49]] Reference [10] contains the typo 'Allen-Chan', which should be 'Allen-Cahn', and reference [49] contains 'Sch :ordinger', which should be 'Schrödinger'.
  3. [Sections 3.3 and 5] The symbol η is used for two different cut-off functions: η(z) in (3.34) and η(d0/δ) in (5.7). This is confusing and should be clarified, for example by using different symbols.
  4. [Remark 3.3] The statement that g1,0 is independent of d1 uses the identity ∫ s^2 s1 dz = 0; this identity should be displayed explicitly, since it is used again in Remark 3.4 and in the proof of Lemma 3.9.
  5. [Figure 1] The flowchart in Figure 1 is difficult to read; the authors should enlarge the text and include explicit equation numbers in each box so that the induction procedure can be followed.
  6. [Theorem 1.1 and Section 1.3] The hypothesis that (Γ,n) is a smooth solution of the limit system (1.6) on [0,T] should be emphasized as a conditional assumption; the result does not address finite-time singularities of the limit flow, which can form under mean curvature motion.
  7. [Section 5, Eq. (5.6)] The gluing formula (5.6) uses the cut-off η(d0/δ), while the inner expansion QK_in is defined with dK; the justification that this mismatch yields the claimed O(ε^{K-1}) residual after (5.4)–(5.5) would be clearer if written out explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the convergence theorem is conditional on an assumed smooth solution of the limit system and the spectral estimates are not forced by the inputs, though the approximate-solution existence proof has an internal gap.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is not circular. Theorem 1.1 assumes a smooth solution (Γ,n) of the limit system (1.6) and builds the approximate solution Q^K around that assumed profile by matched asymptotic expansions; this is a standard conditional statement, not a fit or a renaming of the conclusion. Theorem 1.3 then proves that, under a small initial error, LdG solutions remain close to Q^K, so the ε^{2k} error estimate is a genuine stability result rather than an input restated as a prediction. The paper does import several key technical lemmas from [19] and [21] (Lemmas 2.2, 3.3, 3.5, 6.6–6.8), and because Wei Wang is an author of both cited works this is self-citation; however, these are published, peer-reviewed auxiliary results with proofs in the cited papers, used as tools inside a larger argument and not identical to the main theorem, so they do not make the derivation circular. The manuscript does contain a serious internal proof gap: Section 4.2.1 Step 4 asserts existence of d1 from the boundedness of the map P, and Section 4.3.1 states “We can obtain Q^J_{k+1} in Ω_+ and d_{k+1} on Γ by the system (4.10)” without a fixed-point or compactness argument; this affects the rigor of the existence of Q^K in Theorem 1.1, but it is an omitted proof rather than a reduction of the claimed result to its own assumptions.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The construction introduces no new physical entities or fitted parameters. All constants are either fixed by scaling (a=1,b=9,c=3), prescribed by the physical regime (L in (-3/2,0)), or determined by solvability conditions in the asymptotic hierarchy. The main inputs pulled from outside the paper are the smoothness of the limit solution and standard/prior spectral results.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption There exists a smooth solution (Γ_t,n) of the limit system (1.6) on [0,T] (opening of Theorem 1.1).
    The entire matched expansion is built around this solution; if mean curvature flow develops a singularity before T, the conclusion only holds up to the blow-up time.
  • domain assumption The bulk potential is in the equal-well case b^2=27ac, normalized to a=1, b=9, c=3, s_+=1 (Section 1.3).
    The two wells have equal depth; the analysis of the connecting orbit and the sharp interface limit depends on this equal-well structure.
  • domain assumption The elasticity coefficient satisfies -3/2<L<0 (Section 1.1).
    Ensures 1+2L/3>0 so γ is real and the uniaxial ansatz is stable, as proved by Park-Wang-Zhang-Zhang [43].
  • domain assumption The domain is the flat torus T^3 (end of Section 1.1).
    Used to drop boundary terms in the div-curl identity (Lemma 6.1); on a bounded domain with boundary, additional terms would appear.
  • standard math Quoted spectral lemmas from [19] and [21], specifically Lemmas 6.6, 6.7 and 6.8.
    The paper uses them as black boxes for the second eigenvalue and endpoint estimates of the one-dimensional operators G0 and G1.
  • standard math Standard parabolic existence, Schauder estimates and trace theorems are used to solve the outer and inner expansion hierarchy (Section 4).
    Existence of q_{k,i} and d_k is asserted by these standard tools rather than proved from scratch.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the asymptotic limit for the dynamic isotropic-nematic phase transition with anisotropic elasticity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VJJ2IWHF

@misc{pith2026250818800,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the asymptotic limit for the dynamic isotropic-nematic phase transition with anisotropic elasticity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VJJ2IWHF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.18800}
}
abstract

In this paper, we consider the isotropic-nematic phase transition with anisotropic elasticity governed by the Landau-de Gennes dynamics of liquid crystals. For $-\frac{3}{2}< L<0,$ we rigorously justify the limit from the Landau-de Gennes flow to a sharp interface system characterized by a two-phase flow: The interface evolves via motion by mean curvature; In the isotropic region, $Q=0$; In the nematic region, $Q=s_+(nn-\frac{1}{3}I)$ with $n\in \mathbb{S}^2$ and $s_+>0$, where the alignment vector field $n$ satisfies $$(2s_+^2\partial_t n+h)\times n=0$$ and $h=-\frac{\delta E(n,\nabla n)}{\delta n}$ with $E(n,\nabla n)$ denoting the Oseen-Frank energy; On the interface, the strong anchoring condition $n=\nu$ is satisfied. This result rigorously verifies a claim made by de Gennes [Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 1971] regarding the surface tension strength of isotropic-nematic interfaces in dynamical settings. Furthermore, we rigorously justify this limit using the method of matched asymptotic expansions. First, we employ the idea of ``quasi-minimal connecting orbits'' developed by Fei-Lin-Wang-Zhang [Invent.math. 2023] to construct approximated solutions up to arbitrary order. Second, we derive a uniform spectral lower bound for the linearized operator around the approximate solution. To achieve this, we introduce a suitable basis decomposition and a coordinate transformation to reduce the problem to spectral analysis of two scalar one-dimensional linear operators and some singular product estimates. To address the difficulties arising from anisotropic elasticity and the strong anchoring boundary condition, we introduce a div-curl decomposition and, when estimating the cross terms, combine these with the anisotropic elastic terms to close the energy estimates.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.18800 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The whole procedure to solve the outer and inner expansion systems Moreover, we have by (3.3) that |∇d K| 2 “ 1 ` ÿ 1ďi,jďK i`jěK`1 ε i`j∇dj∇di “ 1 ` Opε K`1 q. (5.4) Upon comparing the coefficients of ε k , it becomes apparent that BtQ K in ´ LpQ K inq ´ 1 ε 2 fpQ K inq [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_1.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Sharp instability of planar isotropic--nematic interfaces in the Landau--de Gennes model

    math.AP 2026-08 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Every non-negative diagonal planar minimizer is unstable under one-dimensional perturbations throughout -3/2 < L < 0, with L=0 as the sharp endpoint.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [19]

    Fei, M., Lin, F., Wang, W., Zhang, Z.: Matrix-valued Allen-Cahn equation and the Keller-Rubinstein-Sternberg problem. Invent. math. 233, 1-80(2023)

    2023

  2. [21]

    Peking Math

    Fei, M., Wang, W., Zhang, P., Zhang, Z.: On the isotropic-nematic phase transition for the liquid crystal . Peking Math. Jour. 1, 141-219(2018)

    2018

  3. [1]

    Abels, H., Fischer, J., Moser, M.: Approximation of classical two-phase flows of viscous incompressible fluids by a Navier-Stokes/Allen-Cahn system . Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 248, 77-127(2024)

    2024

  4. [2]

    Abels, H., Liu, Y.: Sharp interface limit for a Stokes/Allen-Cahn system . Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 229, 417-502(2018)

    2018

  5. [3]

    Alikakos, N.D., Bates, P.W., Chen, X.: Convergence of the Cahn-Hilliard equation to the Hele-Shaw model . Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 128, 165-205(1994)

    1994

  6. [4]

    Acta Metall

    Allen, S., Cahn, J.: A microscopic theory for antiphase motion and its application to antiphase domain coars- ening. Acta Metall. 27, 1084-1095(1979)

    1979

  7. [5]

    M., Zarnescu, A.: Orientable and non-orientable line field models for uniaxial nematic liquid crystals

    Ball, J. M., Zarnescu, A.: Orientable and non-orientable line field models for uniaxial nematic liquid crystals . Mol Cryst. Liq Cryst. 495, 221-573(2008)

    work page 2008

  8. [6]

    arXiv:2003.10189

    Bethuel, F.: Asymptotics for two-dimensional vectorial Allen-Cahn systems . arXiv:2003.10189

    arXiv 2003

Show all 51 references
  1. [7]

    Bronsard, L., Kohn, R.V.: Motion by mean curvature limit of Ginzburg-Landau as the singular dynamics . J. Differ. Equ. 237, 211-237(1991)

    1991

  2. [8]

    Bronsard, L., Stoth, B.: The singular limit of a vector-valued reaction-diffusion process . Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 350, 4931-4953(1998)

    1998

  3. [9]

    Chen, X.: Generation and propagation of interfaces for reaction-diffusion equations . J. Differ. Equ. 96, 116- 141(1992)

    1992

  4. [10]

    Chen, X.: Spectrum for the Allen-Chan, Chan-Hillard, and phase-field equations for generic interfaces . Comm. Partial Differ. Eqs. 19, 1371-1395(1994)

    1994

  5. [11]

    de Gennes, P.G.: Short range order effects in the isotropic phase of nematics and cholesterics . Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 12, 193-214(1971)

    1971

  6. [12]

    de Mottoni, P., Schatzman, M.: Geometrical evolution of developed interfaces . Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 347, 1533-1589(1995)

    1995

  7. [13]

    ON THE ASYMPTOTIC LIMIT FOR THE DYNAMIC ISOTROPIC-NEMATIC

    Dong, H., Wang, W.: Sharp interface limit of a vector-valued Allen-Cahn dynamics, arxiv . ON THE ASYMPTOTIC LIMIT FOR THE DYNAMIC ISOTROPIC-NEMATIC... 63

  8. [14]

    Doi, M.: Molecular dynamics and rheological properties of concentrated solutions of rodlike polymers in isotropic and liquid crystalline phases . J. Polymer Sci. Polymer Phys. Edn. 19, 229-243(1981)

    1981

  9. [15]

    Doi, M., Kuzuu, N.: Structure of the interface between the nematic phase and the isotropic phase in the rodlike molecules. J. Appl. Poly. Sci. 41, 65-68(1985)

    1985

  10. [16]

    Ericksen, J.L.: Liquid crystals with variable degree of orientation . Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 113, 97-120(1990)

    1990

  11. [17]

    Evans, L.C., Soner, H.M., Souganidis, P.E.: Phase transitions and generalized motion by mean curvature . Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 45, 1097-1123(1992)

    1992

  12. [18]

    Liquid crystals

    Frank, F.C.: I. Liquid crystals. On the theory of liquid crystals . Discussions Faraday Soc. 25, 19-28(1958)

    1958

  13. [20]

    Fei, M., Wang, W., Zhang, P., Zhang, Z.: Dynamics of the nematic-isotropic sharp interface for the liquid crystal. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 75, 1700-1724(2015)

    2015

  14. [22]

    Fischer, J., Laux, T., Simon, T.M.: Convergence rates of the Allen-Cahn equation to mean curvature flow: a short proof based on relative entropies , SIAM J. Math. Anal. 52(6), 6222-6233(2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    Fischer, J., Marveggio, A.: Quantitative convergence of the vectorial Allen-Cahn equation towards multiphase mean curvature flow. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire. 41(5), 1117-1178(2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Fonseca, I., Tartar, L.: The gradient theory of phase transitions for systems with two potential wells . Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. Sect. A 111, 89-102(1989)

    1989

  17. [25]

    Ilmanen, T.: Convergence of the Allen-Cahn equation to Brakke motion by mean curvature . J. Differ. Geom. 38, 417-461(1993)

    1993

  18. [26]

    Kamil, S.M., Bhattacharjee, A.K., Adhikari, R., Menon, G.I.: Biaxiality at the isotropic-nematic interface with planar anchoring. Phys. Rev. E 80, 041705(2009)

    2009

  19. [27]

    Kamil, S.M., Bhattacharjee, A.K., Adhikari, R., Menon, G.I.: The isotropic-nematic interface with an oblique anchoring condition. J. Chem. Phys. 131, 174701(2009)

    2009

  20. [28]

    Laux, T., Liu, Y.: Nematic-isotropic phase transition in liquid crystals: a variational derivation of effective geometric motions. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 241, 1785-1814(2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    Laux, T., Simon, T.M.: Convergence of the Allen-Cahn equation to multiphase mean curvature flow . Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 71, 1597-1647(2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    Lin, F.-H.: Complex Ginzburg-Landau equations and dynamics of vortices, filaments, and codimension-2 sub- manifolds. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 51, 385-441(1998)

    1998

  23. [31]

    Elliptic and parabolic methods in geometry (Min- neapolis, MN, 1994), A K Peters, Wellesley, MA, 91-121(1996)

    Lin, F.-H., Poon, C.C.: On nematic liquid crystal droplets . Elliptic and parabolic methods in geometry (Min- neapolis, MN, 1994), A K Peters, Wellesley, MA, 91-121(1996)

    1996

  24. [32]

    Lin, F.-H., Pan, X., Wang, C.: Phase transition for potentials of high-dimensional wells . Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 65, 0833-0888(2012)

    2012

  25. [33]

    Lin, F.-H., Wang, C.: Harmonic maps in connection of phase transitions with higher dimensional potential wells. Chin. Ann. Math. Ser. B 40, 781-810(2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    Lin, F.-H., Wang, C.: Isotropic-nematic phase transition and liquid crystal droplets . Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 76, 1728-1792(2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    Liu, Y.: phase transition of an anisotropic Ginzburg-Landau equation . Calc. Var. Partial. Differ. Equ. 63, 171(2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    Modica, L.: The gradient theory of phase transitions and the minimal interface criterion . Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 98, 123-142(1987)

    1987

  29. [37]

    Modica, L., Mortola, S.: Il limite nella Γ-convergenza di una famiglia di funzionali ellittici . Boll. Un. Mat. Ital. A (5) 14, 526-529(1977)

    1977

  30. [38]

    Asymptot

    Moser, M.: Convergence of the scalar- and vector-valued Allen-Cahn equation to mean curvature flow with 90˝-contact angle in higher dimensions, part I: convergence result . Asymptot. Anal. 3-4(131), 297-383(2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Majumdar, A., Milewski, P.A., Spicer, A.: Front propagation at the nematic-isotropic transition temperature . SIAM J. Appl. Math. 76, 1296-1320(2016)

    2016

  32. [40]

    Mottoni, P., Schatzman, M.: Geometrical evolution of developed interfaces . Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 347, 1533- 1589(1995)

    1995

  33. [41]

    Oseen, C.W.: The theory of liquid crystals . Trans. Faraday Soc. 29, 883-899(1933)

    1933

  34. [42]

    Onsager, L.: The effects of shape on the interaction of colloidal particles . Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 51, 627- 659(1949)

    1949

  35. [43]

    Park, J., Wang, W., Zhang, P., Zhang, Z.: On minimizers for the isotropic-nematic interface problem . Calc. Var. Partial. Difer. Equ. 56, 41(2017)

    2017

  36. [44]

    Popa-Nita, V., Sluckin, T.J.: Kinetics of the nematic-isotropic interface . J. Phys. II (France) 6, 873-884(1996) 64 HUAN DONG, S. REN, AND WEI WANG

    1996

  37. [45]

    Popa-Nita, V., Sluckin, T.J., Wheeler, A.A.: Statics and kinetics at the nematic-isotropic interface: effects of biaxiality. J. Phys. II (France) 7, 1225-1243(1997)

    1997

  38. [46]

    Rubinstein, J., Sternberg, P., Keller, J.: Fast reaction, slow diffusion, and curve shortening . SIAM J. Appl. Math. 49, 116-133(1989)

    1989

  39. [47]

    Rubinstein, J., Sternberg, P., Keller, J.: Reaction-diffusion processes and evolution to harmonic maps . SIAM J. Appl. Math. 49, 1722-1733(1989)

    1989

  40. [48]

    Sternberg, P.: The effect of a singular perturbation on nonconvex variational problems . Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 101, 209-260(1988)

    1988

  41. [49]

    Schlag, W., Soffer, A., Staubach, W.: Decay for the wave and Sch :ordinger evolutions on manifolds with conical ends. I. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 362(1), 19-52(2010)

    2010

  42. [50]

    Wang, W., Zhang, P., Zhang, Z.: Rigorous derivation from Landau-de Gennes theory to Ericksen-Leslie theory . SIAM J. Math. Anal. 47, 127-158(2015)

    2015

  43. [51]

    Wang, W., Zhang, P., Zhang, Z.: The small Deborah number limit of the Doi-Onsager equation to the Ericksen- Leslie equation. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 68, 1326-1398(2015) Department of Mathematics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China Email address: huandong@math.pku.edu.c...

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.