Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 49 references

Existence and multiplicity of solutions to discrete fractional logarithmic Kirchhoff equations

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A discrete fractional logarithmic Kirchhoff equation on the integer lattice has a ground state for p>4, a sign-changing ground state for p>6, and hence four distinct nontrivial solutions.

desk verdict First results for a genuinely new equation class, with checkable algebra and a real but fixable gap in the sign-changing proof. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.18840 v1 pith:OCGPGEMV submitted 2025-08-26 math.AP

Lidan Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35A1535R0235R11
keywords fractionalLaplacianKirchhoffequationlogarithmicnonlinearitylatticegraphgroundstatesolutionsign-changingNeharimanifoldmountain-passtheorem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that a discrete equation on the integer lattice, combining a fractional Laplacian, a Kirchhoff-type nonlocal coefficient, and a logarithmic superlinear term, still has the standard solution landscape of nonlinear elliptic problems. For exponents p>4 and with a coercive potential, a mountain-pass argument yields a least-energy nontrivial solution. For p>6 the same equation has a least-energy sign-changing solution whose energy is strictly greater than twice the ground-state energy. Since the equation is odd, each solution has a distinct negative counterpart, so the equation has at least four distinct nontrivial weak solutions. The interest is that all of this survives on a discrete lattice with a nonlocal fractional operator and a nonlocal Kirchhoff term.

What carries the argument

The argument runs on the energy functional J_{s,2} defined on the weighted fractional Sobolev space H^{s,2}(Z^d), whose norm combines a integral of |nabla^s u|^2 with h(x)u^2. Three constrained objects do the work: the Nehari manifold, the set of nonzero functions where the derivative of the energy along the function itself vanishes; the sign-changing Nehari set, where the positive and negative parts each satisfy that condition; and the cross-term K(u) <= 0 that measures the fractional interaction between the positive and negative parts u+ and u-. The key identity is the two-parameter decomposition of the energy for ru+ + tu-, where the extra interaction term -rtK(u) is strictly positive in

What would settle it

Compute or construct a bounded sequence in H^{s,2}(Z^d) with a potential satisfying (h1)-(h2) that has no strongly convergent subsequence in l^2(Z^d); that would falsify Lemma 2.5, the step on which the compactness and the sign-changing minimization depend. Alternatively, find any p>6 example where the sign-changing minimizer v satisfies J_{s,2}(v) <= 2J_{s,2}(u), which would refute Theorem 1.3.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the discrete fractional logarithmic Kirchhoff equation on the integer lattice Z^d, with a coercive potential h and a kernel w_s comparable to |x-y|^{-d-2s}, has a two-tier variational structure. For p>4, a mountain-pass argument produces a nontrivial weak solution u whose energy is the least among all solutions on the Nehari manifold. For p>6, minimizing the energy over the set of sign-changing functions whose positive and negative parts each satisfy the derivative equation yields a sign-changing weak solution v, and the energy comparison J_{s,2}(v) > 2 J_{s,2}(u) holds. Because the nonlinearity is odd, -u and -v are also solutions, so the equation has at least fou

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the compact embedding of the weighted fractional Sobolev space H^{s,2}(Z^d) into every l^q space with q >= 2, stated as Lemma 2.5 with its proof omitted and deferred to an unpublished preprint; if that embedding fails, the compactness condition, the sign-changing minimization, and the limit passages in the proof collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For p>6, equation (1) possesses at least four distinct nontrivial weak solutions: plus and minus the ground state u, and plus and minus the sign-changing solution v.
  • The sign-changing solution has strictly higher energy than two copies of the ground state, so it cannot be assembled from two independent ground states.
  • For p>4, the least-energy level on the Nehari manifold equals the mountain-pass level, giving a genuine critical point at that level.
  • The constrained sign-changing minimizer is a genuine weak solution, not merely a minimizer on the sign-changing Nehari set.
  • The result holds for every dimension d of the integer lattice and every s in (0,1) satisfying the kernel bounds, under the stated assumptions on the potential h.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The threshold p>6 is algebraic rather than topological: the two-parameter energy comparison requires positivity of combinations like (1-r^4)/4 - (1-r^p)/p and their three-variable analogues, so a different comparison inequality could in principle push the sign-changing result to lower exponents, but that would require a new proof.
  • Because the proof uses only the compact embedding and the two-sided kernel bound, the same variational scheme should transfer to other locally finite graphs with coercive potentials; testing the embedding lemma for such graphs is the natural next step.
  • The energy gap J(v) > 2J(u) is established but not quantified; a quantitative lower bound in terms of p, s, and the potential h would sharpen the multiplicity claim and is not implied by the paper.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the discrete fractional logarithmic Kirchhoff equation (1) on the integer lattice Z^d, where the fractional Laplacian is defined through a symmetric kernel w_s comparable to |x-y|^{-d-2s}, and h satisfies coercivity assumptions (h1)-(h2). An energy functional J_{s,2} is introduced on a weighted fractional Sobolev space H^{s,2}. The main results are: Theorem 1.1, for p>4, existence of a nontrivial ground state solution via the mountain-pass theorem; Theorem 1.2, for p>6, existence of a ground state sign-changing solution minimizing J_{s,2} on the sign-changing Nehari-type set M_{s,2}; and Theorem 1.3, for p>6, the sign-changing ground state energy is strictly larger than twice the ground state energy, yielding at least four distinct nontrivial weak solutions ±u, ±v. The proofs combine standard variational machinery (compact embedding, Palais-Smale condition, Nehari manifold analysis, Miranda's theorem) with explicit algebraic comparison lemmas controlling the nonlocal and logarithmic terms.

Significance. If the gaps noted below are repaired, the paper establishes that a discrete fractional logarithmic Kirchhoff equation inherits the full variational picture known for continuous fractional Kirchhoff problems: a mountain-pass ground state for p>4, a sign-changing ground state for p>6, and an energy-ordering multiplicity result. The main structural lemmas (3.3 and 4.1) are proved in detail, and the key algebraic inequalities are explicit; these are genuine strengths. The result is a natural extension of the author's earlier work [37], [38] to the fractional Kirchhoff setting on lattice graphs. However, two load-bearing points currently require attention: an omitted compactness proof and a miscomputed limit passage in Lemma 4.4. Neither appears fatal — the latter has a straightforward repair — but both must be fixed before the main theorems are fully supported.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4, Lemma 4.4] The passage to the limit after Eq. (16) is miscomputed. From (16), the bracket C_k := ||u_k^±||^2_H + b||∇^s u_k||_2^2(||∇^s u_k^±||_2^2 - 1/2 K(u_k)) - (a/2)K(u_k) equals ∫(|u_k^±|^p log(u_k^±)^2)^+ dμ - ∫(|u_k^±|^p log(u_k^±)^2)^- dμ. Therefore the displayed quantity C_k - ∫(|u_k^±|^p log(u_k^±)^2)^- dμ equals P_k - 2N_k, not P_k; the displayed equality to limsup_k ∫(|u_k^±|^p log(u_k^±)^2)^+ dμ is false unless N_k=0, which is not argued. This invalidates the derivation of ⟨J'(u),u^±⟩≤0 as written. The conclusion is nevertheless recoverable: using u_k→u in ℓ^2∩ℓ^q, the bound ||∇^s w||_2≤C||w||_2 from (3), and the growth estimate (15), one can pass to the limit directly in (16) to obtain ⟨J'(u),u^±⟩=0. Please rewrite this step.
  2. [§2, Lemma 2.5] The compact embedding H^{s,2} ↪ ℓ^q(Z^d), q≥2, is stated with the proof omitted ('The proof is similar to that of [48]. We omit it here.'). This lemma is used at every compactness step: Lemma 3.2 for the (PS)_c condition, Lemma 4.4 for the sign-changing minimizing sequence, and the dominated-convergence passage to the limit. Since [48] is an unreviewed arXiv preprint, the paper should supply a self-contained proof or replace this reference by a citable published result. The same concern applies to estimate (3), delegated to [39, Theorem 2.4], which underpins the finiteness of the nonlocal sums and the sign of K(u).
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3, Lemma 3.2] In the displayed estimate near the end of the proof, the integral is written as ∫_{Z^3}; it should be ∫_{Z^d}.
  2. [§4, proof of Theorem 1.3] In the equation for z = -w, the last term reads 'log v^2'; it should be 'log z^2' (or 'log(-w)^2').
  3. [Throughout] There are minor typographical issues: the running header has 'MUL TIPLICITY'; the Poincaré-Miranda reference is typeset as 'P oinca´ e-Miranda'; and in the proof of Lemma 4.4 the phrase 'Lebesgue dominated theorem' is nonstandard but understandable.
  4. [§2, Lemma 2.5] The statement includes compact embedding into ℓ^q for q∈[2,∞], including q=∞. If the proof is supplied, please clarify the meaning of strong convergence in ℓ^∞ and note the tail-control needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main theorems are derived in-text from stated assumptions; the few self-citations are motivational, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are proven from the stated hypotheses (h1)-(h2) rather than assumed. Theorem 1.1 is obtained via an in-text mountain-pass argument: Lemma 3.1 supplies the geometry, Lemma 3.2 proves the (PS)_c condition, and Lemmas 3.3 and 3.6 identify the mountain-pass level with the Nehari infimum. Theorem 1.2 is built from in-text lemmas 4.1-4.4, which construct the sign-changing Nehari set, prove existence and uniqueness of the scaling pair (r_u,t_u), control it via Lemma 4.3, and produce a minimizer; the criticality of that minimizer is then shown by a deformation/Miranda argument. Theorem 1.3 follows from Lemma 4.1, K(v)<0, and the odd symmetry of the equation. The only external results that do substantive work are Lemma 2.2 and Lemma 2.5 from [48], and estimate (3) from [39, Theorem 2.4]; neither is authored by the present author, so these are independent supports, not self-citation. The self-citations [37] and [38] appear only in the Introduction as motivation ('Very recently, Wang [38] studied...', 'Wang [37] considered...') and no theorem or formula is imported from them. Two non-circular concerns should be noted: Lemma 2.5's proof is omitted ('The proof is similar to that of [48]. We omit it here.'), creating a completeness gap, and the limit passage in Lemma 4.4 after equation (16) contains an algebraic identity that is questionable as written; these are correctness/rigor issues, not circular reductions. No step in the derivation reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, a self-citation chain, or a definitional equivalence.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard variational machinery plus two delegated analytic facts (compact embedding and weight bounds) sourced from unreviewed arXiv preprints, and on in-text computations (Proposition 2.6 and Lemma 4.1) whose skeletal identities I spot-checked. There are no free parameters, no fitted constants, and no invented entities.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption H^{s,2}(Z^d) compactly embeds into l^q(Z^d) for all q >= 2 under (h1)-(h2)
    Lemma 2.5; proof omitted and delegated to the unreviewed arXiv preprint [48]. Load-bearing for the (PS) condition and for extracting minimizers in Sections 3 and 4.
  • domain assumption Two-sided weight bounds c_{s,d}|x-y|^{-d-2s} <= w_s(x,y) <= C_{s,d}|x-y|^{-d-2s} hold for the fractional Laplacian on Z^d
    Equation (3), cited to [39, Theorem 2.4] (an arXiv preprint). Needed for convergence of the nonlocal sums, for the operator to be well defined, and for the strict cross-term negativity K(u) < 0 used in Section 4.
  • standard math Growth interpolation: |t|^{p-1}|log t^2| <= eps|t| + C_eps|t|^{q-1} for any q > p
    Equation (2) in Section 1; an elementary estimate used throughout to control the logarithmic nonlinearity in the energy and in compactness arguments.
  • standard math Variational toolkit: mountain pass theorem, (PS) condition, Nehari manifold parametrization, Miranda's theorem
    Sections 3 and 4 rely on these standard tools; the paper verifies their hypotheses in-text (C^1 functional, geometry, compactness).
  • domain assumption Potential assumptions (h1)-(h2): h(x) >= h0 > 0 and h(x) -> infinity as |x| -> infinity
    Section 1; coercivity of h is what makes the weighted space H^{s,2} a Hilbert space and provides the compact embedding of Lemma 2.5.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Existence and multiplicity of solutions to discrete fractional logarithmic Kirchhoff equations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OCGPGEMV

@misc{pith2026250818840,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Existence and multiplicity of solutions to discrete fractional logarithmic Kirchhoff equations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OCGPGEMV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.18840}
}
abstract

In this paper, we study the discrete fractional logarithmic Kirchhoff equation $$ \left(a+b \int_{\mathbb{Z}^d}|\nabla^s u|^{2} d \mu\right) (-\Delta)^s u+h(x) u=|u|^{p-2}u \log u^{2}, \quad x\in \mathbb{Z}^d, $$ where $a,\,b>0$ and $0<s<1$. Under suitable assumptions on $h(x)$, we first prove the existence of ground state solutions by the mountain-pass theorem for $p>4$; then we verify the existence of ground state sign-changing solutions based on the method of Nehari manifold for $p>6$. Finally, we establish the multiplicity of nontrivial weak solutions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [48]

    Fractional Laplace operator and related Schr\"odinger equations on locally finite graphs

    M. Zhang, Y. Lin and Y. Yang, Fractional Laplace operator and related Schr¨ odinger equations on locally finite graphs. arXiv:2408.02902

    work page Pith review arXiv

  2. [37]

    Fractional logarithmic Schr\"{o}dinger equations on lattice graphs

    L. Wang, Fractional logarithmic Schr¨ odinger equations on lattice graphs. arXiv:2409.09976

    work page Pith review arXiv

  3. [38]

    Wang, Sign-changing solutions to discrete nonlinear logarithmic Kirchhoff equations

    L. Wang, Sign-changing solutions to discrete nonlinear logarithmic Kirchhoff equations. J. Geom. Anal. 35 (2025), no. 9, Paper No. 274

    work page 2025

  4. [1]

    Alves, C

    C.O. Alves, C. Ji, Existence and concentration of positive solutions for a logarithmic Schr¨ odinger equation via penalization method. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 59 (2020), no. 1, Paper No. 21, 27 pp

    work page 2020

  5. [2]

    Alves, C

    C.O. Alves, C. Ji, Multi-peak positive solutions for a logarithmic Schr¨ odinger equation via variational methods. Israel J. Math. 259 (2024), no. 2, 835-885

    work page 2024

  6. [3]

    Ambrosio, Concentration phenomena for a class of fractional Kirchhoff equations inRN with general nonlinearities

    V. Ambrosio, Concentration phenomena for a class of fractional Kirchhoff equations inRN with general nonlinearities. Nonlinear Anal. 195 (2020), 111761, 39 pp

    work page 2020

  7. [4]

    Chang, R

    X. Chang, R. Wang and D. Yan, Ground states for logarithmic Schr¨ odinger equations on locally finite graphs. J. Geom. Anal. 33 (2023), no.7, Paper No. 211

    work page 2023

  8. [5]

    Chang, V.D

    X. Chang, V.D. R˘adulescu, R. Wang and D. Yan, Convergence of least energy sign-changing solutions for logarithmic Schr¨ odinger equations on locally finite graphs. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 125 (2023), Paper No. 107418

    work page 2023

Show all 49 references
  1. [6]

    Cheng, S

    S. Cheng, S. Yao and H. Chen, A generalized Brezis-Lieb lemma on graphs and its application to Kirchhoff type equations. Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 47 (2024), no. 5, Paper No. 141, 36 pp

    2024

  2. [7]

    Di Nezza, G

    E. Di Nezza, G. Palatucci and E. Valdinoci, Hitchhiker’s guide to the fractional Sobolev spaces. Bull. Sci. Math. 136 (2012), no. 5, 521-573

    2012

  3. [8]

    W. Feng, X. Tang and L. Zhang, Existence of a positive bound state solution for logarithmic Schr¨ odinger equation. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 531 (2024), no. 2, Paper No. 127861

    2024

  4. [9]

    S. Feng, L. Wang and L. Huang, Least energy sign-changing solutions of fractional Kirchhoff-Schr¨ odinger-Poisson system with critical and logarithmic nonlinearity. Complex Var. Elliptic Equ. 68 (2023), no. 1, 81-106. 20

    2023

  5. [10]

    Fiscella, E

    A. Fiscella, E. Valdinoci, A critical Kirchhoff type problem involving a nonlocal operator. Nonlinear Anal. 94 (2014), 156-170

    2014

  6. [11]

    Y. Gao, Y. Jiang, L. Liu and N. Wei, Multiple positive solutions for a logarithmic Kirchhoff type problem in R3. Appl. Math. Lett. 139 (2023), Paper No. 108539

    2023

  7. [12]

    G. Gu, X. Yang and Z. Yang, Infinitely many sign-changing solutions for nonlinear fractional Kirchhoff equations. Appl. Anal. 101 (2022), no. 16, 5850-5871

    2022

  8. [13]

    X. Han, M. Shao and L. Zhao, Existence and convergence of solutions for nonlinear biharmonic equations on graphs. J. Differential Equations 268 (2020), 3936-3961

    2020

  9. [14]

    F. Han, L. Wang, Positive solutions to discrete harmonic functions in unbounded cylinders. J. Korean Math. Soc. 61 (2024), no. 2, 377-393

    2024

  10. [15]

    Z. He, C. Ji, Existence and multiplicity of solutions for the logarithmic Schr¨ odinger equation with a potential on lattice graphs. J. Geom. Anal. 34 (2024), no. 12, Paper No. 378, 31 pp

    2024

  11. [16]

    D. Hu, Q. Gao, Multiple solutions to logarithmic Kirchhoff equations, Acta Math. Sci. 42A (2) (2022), 401-417

    2022

  12. [17]

    B. Hua, R. Li and L. Wang, A class of semilinear elliptic equations on groups of polynomial growth. J. Differential Equations 363 (2023), 327-349

    2023

  13. [18]

    Huang, Y

    T. Huang, Y. Shang, Multiple solutions for the logarithmic fractional Kirchhoff equation with critical or supercritical nonlinearity. Complex Var. Elliptic Equ. 70 (2025), no. 1, 115-136

    2025

  14. [19]

    Isernia, Sign-changing solutions for a fractional Kirchhoff equation

    T. Isernia, Sign-changing solutions for a fractional Kirchhoff equation. Nonlinear Anal. 190 (2020), 111623, 20 pp

    2020

  15. [20]

    W. Kulpa. The Poinca´ e-Miranda theorem. Am. Math. Mon. 104 (1997), 545-550

    1997

  16. [21]

    Laskin, Fractional quantum mechanics and L´ evy path integrals

    N. Laskin, Fractional quantum mechanics and L´ evy path integrals. Phys. Lett. A 268 (2000), no. 4-6, 298-305

    2000

  17. [22]

    Lei, Multiple positive solutions for a fractional Kirchhoff type equation with logarithmic and singular nonlinearities

    J. Lei, Multiple positive solutions for a fractional Kirchhoff type equation with logarithmic and singular nonlinearities. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. 2023, Paper No. 53, 16 pp

    2023

  18. [23]

    R. Li, L. Wang, The existence and convergence of solutions for the nonlinear Choquard equations on groups of polynomial growth. J. Partial Differ. Equ. 38 (2025), no. 2, 226-248

    2025

  19. [24]

    Y. Li, D. Wang and J. Zhang, Sign-changing solutions for a class of p-Laplacian Kirchhoff-type problem with loga- rithmic nonlinearity. AIMS Math. 5 (2020), no. 3, 2100-2112

    2020

  20. [25]

    L¨ u, Ground states of a Kirchhoff equation with the potential on the lattice graphs

    W. L¨ u, Ground states of a Kirchhoff equation with the potential on the lattice graphs. Commun. Anal. Mech. 15 (2023), 792-810

    2023

  21. [26]

    X. Ou, X. Zhang, Ground-state sign-changing homoclinic solutions for a discrete nonlinear p-Laplacian equation with logarithmic nonlinearity. Bound. Value Probl. (2024), Paper No. 6

    2024

  22. [27]

    Ouaziz, Abdesslam and A

    A. Ouaziz, Abdesslam and A. Aberqi, Infinitely many solutions to a Kirchhoff-type equation involving logarithmic nonlinearity via Morse’s theory. Bol. Soc. Mat. Mex. (3) 30 (2024), no. 1, Paper No. 10, 21 pp

    2024

  23. [28]

    G. Pan, C. Ji, Existence and convergence of the least energy sign-changing solutions for nonlinear Kirchhoff equations on locally finite graphs. Asymptot. Anal. 133 (2023), no. 4, 463-482

    2023

  24. [29]

    M. Shao, Y. Yang and L. Zhao, Multiplicity and limit of solutions for logarithmic Schr¨ odinger equations on graphs. J. Math. Phys. 65 (2024), no. 4, Paper No. 041508

    2024

  25. [30]

    L. Shao, H. Chen, Multiplicity and concentration of nontrivial solutions for a class of fractional Kirchhoff equations with steep potential well. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 45 (2022), no. 4, 2349-2363

    2022

  26. [31]

    M. Shao, Y. Yang and L. Zhao, Sobolev spaces on locally finite graphs. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 153 (2025), no. 2, 693-708

    2025

  27. [32]

    Shuai, Existence and multiplicity of solutions for logarithmic Schr¨ odinger equations with potential

    W. Shuai, Existence and multiplicity of solutions for logarithmic Schr¨ odinger equations with potential. J. Math. Phys. 62 (2021), no. 5, Paper No. 051501

    2021

  28. [33]

    Wang, Solutions to discrete nonlinear Kirchhoff-Choquard equations

    L. Wang, Solutions to discrete nonlinear Kirchhoff-Choquard equations. Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 47 (2024), no. 5, Paper No. 138

    2024

  29. [34]

    Wang, Solutions to discrete fractional Schr¨ odinger equations

    L. Wang, Solutions to discrete fractional Schr¨ odinger equations. Bull. Iranian Math. Soc. 51 (2025), no. 4, Paper No. 49

    2025

  30. [35]

    Wang, A class of p-Laplacian equations on lattice graphs

    L. Wang, A class of p-Laplacian equations on lattice graphs. Acta Math. Sin. (Engl. Ser.) 41 (2025), no. 5, 1418-1430

    2025

  31. [36]

    Wang, Solutions to discrete nonlinear Kirchhoff-Choquard equations with power nonlinearity

    L. Wang, Solutions to discrete nonlinear Kirchhoff-Choquard equations with power nonlinearity. J. Elliptic Parabol. Equ. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41808-025-00363-2

    2025 doi

  32. [39]

    Wang, Eigenvalue estimates for the fractional Laplacian on lattice subgraphs

    J. Wang, Eigenvalue estimates for the fractional Laplacian on lattice subgraphs. arXiv: 2303.15766

    arXiv

  33. [40]

    L. Wen, X. Tang and S. Chen, Ground state sign-changing solutions for Kirchhoff equations with logarithmic non- linearity. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. (2019), Paper No. 47

    2019

  34. [41]

    K. Wu, G. Gu, Existence of positive solutions for fractional Kirchhoff equation. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 73 (2022), no. 2, Paper No. 45, 13 pp

    2022

  35. [42]

    Wu, Infinitely many positive multi-bump solutions for fractional Kirchhoff equations

    K. Wu, Infinitely many positive multi-bump solutions for fractional Kirchhoff equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 525 (2023), no. 2, Paper No. 127144, 27 pp

    2023

  36. [43]

    Xiang, D

    M. Xiang, D. Hu and D. Yang, Least energy solutions for fractional Kirchhoff problems with logarithmic nonlinearity. Nonlinear Anal. 198 (2020), 111899, 20 pp. 21

    2020

  37. [44]

    Q. Yang, C. Bai, Sign-changing solutions for a class of fractional Kirchhoff-type problem with logarithmic nonlinearity. AIMS Math. 6 (2021), no. 1, 868-881

    2021

  38. [45]

    W. Yang, J. Liao, Ground state sign-changing solution for a logarithmic Kirchhoff-type equation in R3. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. 2024, Paper No. 42, 19 pp

    2024

  39. [46]

    Y. Yang, L. Zhao, Normalized solutions for nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations on graphs. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 536 (2024), no. 1, Paper No. 128173, 17 pp

    2024

  40. [47]

    Zhang, X

    C. Zhang, X. Zhang, Bound states for logarithmic Schr¨ odinger equations with potentials unbounded below. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 59 (2020), no. 1, Paper No. 23, 31 pp

    2020

  41. [49]

    Zloshchastiev, Logarithmic nonlinearity in theories of quantum gravity: origin of time and observational con- sequences

    K.G. Zloshchastiev, Logarithmic nonlinearity in theories of quantum gravity: origin of time and observational con- sequences. Gravit. Cosmol. 16 (2010), no. 4, 288-297. Email address: wanglidan@ujs.edu.cn Lidan W ang: School of Mathematical Sciences, Jiangsu University, Zhenji...

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.