Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 65 references

Robust Circularly Polarized Luminescence via Quasi-Bound States in the Continuum in Intrinsic Chiral Silicon Metasurfaces

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Using an intrinsic chiral silicon metasurface, the paper makes achiral organic dye emit circularly polarized light with a dissymmetry factor above 0.1, and shows that the quasi-BIC emission is robust while a surface lattice resonance can fl

desk verdict Solid same-platform comparison of quasi-BIC vs SLR CPL with genuinely interesting robustness/sign-flip data; the printed simulation equation Eq. (4) does not match the measured quantity and should be fixed before I fully trust the numerics. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.18927 v1 pith:5OIGOA53 submitted 2025-08-26 physics.optics

Xiao-ke Zhu , Yu-Chen Wei , Jose L. Pura , Matthijs Berghuis , Minpeng Liang , Beatriz Castillo López de Larrinzar , Shunsuke Murai , Antonio García-Martín
show 3 more authors
José A. Sánchez-Gil Sailing He Jaime Gómez Rivas
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords circularlypolarizedluminescencequasi-boundstatesinthecontinuumsurfacelatticeresonanceschiralsiliconmetasurfacesdissymmetryfactorhelicitydensitymultipoledecompositionachiralorganicdye
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Ordinary perylene dye emits unpolarized light; this paper shows that placing it on a metasurface of paired silicon nanorods with broken mirror symmetry makes it emit circularly polarized light. The circular polarization arises from two photonic resonances of the array: a quasi-bound state in the continuum (quasi-BIC) and a surface lattice resonance (SLR). The quasi-BIC gives a moderate but stable dissymmetry factor, gPL≈0.1, that does not change when the dye layer is made thicker or when the emission angle is varied. The SLR gives a larger gPL≈0.17 but is fragile: its handedness flips with dye thickness or emission angle. If correct, these results point toward compact circularly polarized light sources made from common achiral emitters on silicon rather than from specially synthesized chiral molecules.

What carries the argument

The central objects are the two resonant modes of a square lattice of paired silicon nanorods in which one rod is shifted along y by ±96 nm. The quasi-BIC is a symmetry-protected dark mode dominated by antisymmetric in-plane electric dipoles (py), giving high field confinement and robustness. The SLR arises from hybridization of localized dipoles with Rayleigh-anomaly diffraction, here dominated by a magnetic dipole (mx) plus antisymmetric pz, which produces stronger circular polarization but weaker confinement. The argument's engine is the reciprocity-based gPL formula, Eq. (4), which converts the difference between near-field intensities under LCP and RCP plane-wave illumination, integrate

What would settle it

Measure gPL directly while varying dye-layer thickness in fine steps across the 220–380 nm range and compare to Eq. (4) predictions at the same wavevector; a predicted sign flip of the SLR at a specific thickness and angle would confirm, while its absence—or a sign flip of the quasi-BIC—would falsify the central claim. A second check: replace the perylene/PMMA layer with a film of known anisotropic dipole orientation and see whether the measured gPL tracks the simulated near-field integral.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that intrinsic chirality of the silicon nanorod dimer array—not any chirality of the emitter—determines the handedness and strength of circularly polarized photoluminescence. The quasi-BIC mode is carried by an antisymmetric in-plane electric dipole and shows a uniform helicity density that survives changes in dye thickness and emission angle, giving a constant gPL≈0.1. The SLR mode, carried by an out-of-plane electric dipole with a strong in-plane magnetic dipole, reaches gPL≈0.17 but its near-field handedness reverses as the emission wavevector and layer thickness change, explaining the observed sign inversion. Numerical gPL maps obtained from LCP/RCP near-field intens

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the dye's photoluminescence is exactly proportional to the local electric-field intensity integrated over the emitter layer, with random molecular orientations and no metasurface-induced change in radiative rate, quantum yield, or dipole alignment; if that proportionality fails, the simulated gPL maps and the sign-flip explanation lose quantitative support.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Chiral luminescent devices can be built from achiral, high-quantum-efficiency emitters on silicon, bypassing difficult chiral-molecule synthesis.
  • The quasi-BIC branch is the design choice when emission handedness must stay fixed despite fabrication or layer-thickness variations.
  • The SLR branch offers tunable chirality: changing dye thickness or emission angle reverses the sign of gPL in the same structure.
  • Together, the two modes provide a design rule: electric-dipole-dominated dark modes for robustness, magnetic-dipole-dominated lattice modes for higher dissymmetry.
  • Opposite enantiomorphs (Dy=±96 nm) produce opposite gPL signs with similar magnitude, confirming geometric control of handedness.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper's claims: the SLR sign flip could be exploited as an active chirality switch in a single device, toggled by layer thickness, angle, or wavelength.
  • The reliability of the predicted gPL maps rests on Eq. (4)'s assumption that dye emission is proportional to the integrated local near-field intensity; a direct test would be to use a dye layer with controlled dipole orientation and compare measured and simulated gPL.
  • Because the quasi-BIC robustness is tied to strong lateral confinement, similar robustness is expected for other high-Q dark modes even in lossier materials—an extension the paper does not state explicitly.
  • The measured quasi-BIC gPL exceeds simulation for one enantiomorph, hinting that nanofabrication imperfections may enhance chiral emission; controlled disorder studies could turn this into a design variable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports circularly polarized photoluminescence (CPL) from achiral perylene dye molecules coupled to intrinsic chiral silicon nanorod-dimer metasurfaces. Using Fourier-microscopy measurements of photoluminescence enhancement and gPL maps, the authors find that the quasi-BIC mode gives a robust gPL of about 0.1 across emission angle and dye-layer thickness (220 nm and 380 nm), while the SLR mode gives a larger gPL of about 0.17 and can exhibit sign inversion with photon energy, wavevector, and layer thickness. COMSOL simulations based on Lorentz reciprocity, multipole decomposition, and helicity-density analysis are used to interpret the experimental maps. The central claim is that quasi-BICs provide robust chiro-optical emission whereas SLRs are more environmentally sensitive.

Significance. If the reported results are correct, the work is a useful contribution to chirality-enabled nanophotonics, providing a direct experimental comparison of quasi-BIC and SLR behavior in the same intrinsic chiral silicon platform. The paper's strengths include angle-resolved gPL measurements on two enantiomeric structures, a thickness-dependent study, and ab initio COMSOL modeling with parameters taken from the fabricated geometry rather than fitted to the measured gPL. The multipole and helicity analyses give a physical narrative for why the quasi-BIC is robust. However, the numerical validation is undermined by an inconsistency in the printed definition of the simulated gPL, and the central 'robustness' statement is made without any experimental uncertainty or reproducibility assessment.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods, Eq. (4)] Equation (4) defines the simulated dissymmetry as gPL(k,λ) = 2 ∫∫∫_V (|E_LCP|² − |E_RCP|²)/(|E_LCP|² + |E_RCP|²) d³r. As written this is a volume integral of a position-dependent local dissymmetry, with units of volume, not the measured quantity gPL = 2(I_LCP − I_RCP)/(I_LCP + I_RCP), where the intensities are integrated over the emitting volume. Unless the local dissymmetry is constant across the dye layer—which is not the case for a strongly confined quasi-BIC or an extended SLR—the simulated maps in Fig. 3d–e and Fig. S9 do not correspond to the experimental gPL. If the COMSOL implementation instead used the correctly normalized ratio of integrated intensities, Eq. (4) is miswritten. Either way, the numerical validation of the central claim needs to be stated with the correct formula and, if the implementation followed the printed formula, the maps must be recomputed.
  2. [Discussion, Figs. 4b–c and 5d–e] The explanation of the SLR sign inversion relies on comparing near-field intensity differences between LCP and RCP illumination at two (kx, photon-energy) points. This comparison is made despite the fact that the simulated gPL maps are affected by the Eq. (4) issue, and the simulated bands show a frequency shift relative to experiment. The manuscript does not specify at which simulated energies/wavevectors the near-field cuts are taken or how those correspond to the measured sign change. As a result, the proposed mechanism for the sign inversion—while plausible—lacks quantitative, self-consistent support. Please either tie the near-field analysis to a correctly computed integrated-intensity gPL or soften the claim to a qualitative illustration.
  3. [Figures 3 and 5; Conclusions] All experimental gPL values (quasi-BIC ≈ 0.1, SLR ≈ 0.17, sign inversion) are reported without error bars, confidence intervals, or any statement about sample-to-sample or measurement-to-measurement variability. The central claims are about consistency ('robust', 'consistent gPL of 0.1') and about a sign flip, both of which require at least an estimate of experimental uncertainty. The discrepancy between measured and simulated quasi-BIC gPL is attributed to 'sample imperfections' without supporting evidence. Please provide repeated measurements, uncertainty bars on the gPL maps, or an explicit statement about the number of independent samples/measurements and how representative the displayed maps are.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Methods, Eq. (4)] The notation dr³ is nonstandard; use dV or d³r consistently. Also clarify whether the integral is normalized by the dye-layer volume or by the total near-field intensity.
  2. [Introduction / Fig. 2 caption] The sentence 'The PLE vanishes in the direction normal to the surface (kx = 0)' should specify that this applies to the quasi-BIC band; the SLR mode radiates at normal incidence.
  3. [Discussion, Fig. 4 captions] The color scales in Fig. 4a are described as magenta vs. blue/green but the text also references 'symmetric/antisymmetric character'; please make the caption self-contained and define the color mapping for each panel.
  4. [Throughout] The phrase 'intrinsic chiral' could be confused with material chirality; since the chirality is structural (nanorod displacement), consider using 'structurally chiral' or 'intrinsic structural chirality' for clarity.
  5. [Supporting Information] Several claims refer to figures S3–S10. Ensure the SI is accessible and that all SI figure callouts are numbered consistently with the manuscript text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the measured gPL maps are independent experimental data, the COMSOL simulations are parameter-free and not fitted to those gPL values, and the multipole/helicity analysis is explanatory rather than a self-fulfilling construction. Minor self-citations and one definitional mismatch in Eq. (4) are caveats but do not make the central claim tautological.

full rationale

The paper's central experimental claims—gPL ≈ 0.1 for quasi-BIC and gPL ≈ 0.17 for SLR with sign inversion—are based on angle-resolved photoluminescence measurements with a Fourier microscope, not on any fitted model output. The COMSOL simulations use structural parameters taken from the fabricated samples (rod dimensions, lattice constant, displacements, dye-layer thickness) and the dye's optical constants; no free parameter is adjusted to force agreement with the measured gPL. The multipole decomposition and helicity-density maps are used to interpret the measured modes after the fact, which is post hoc explanation rather than circular prediction. There are self-citations (e.g., refs. 47, 52, 54, 55), but they are background or auxiliary: ref. 55 is used to justify neglecting quadrupoles in the spectral range, and ref. 54 is cited for lateral confinement of BICs. These are not the sole load-bearing support for the measured gPL robustness, which is established directly by the experimental maps and the parameter-free simulations; hence no self-citation chain forces the conclusion. No uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no ansatz is smuggled in via citation. One non-circular but important quantitative caveat appears in Eq. (4): the printed formula defines the simulated gPL as a volume integral of the local dissymmetry ratio, whereas the experimentally measured gPL is the dissymmetry of the total integrated LCP and RCP intensities. These two expressions are not mathematically equivalent unless the local dissymmetry is constant over the dye layer, which is not the case for the confined quasi-BIC and extended SLR modes. This is a modeling/definitional mismatch that could affect the quantitative strength of the numerical validation, as the skeptic notes. However, it is not a case of a fitted parameter being renamed as a prediction, nor does it make the measured result equivalent to the simulation by construction. The paper itself acknowledges a quantitative discrepancy for the quasi-BIC gPL and attributes it to sample imperfections, which is a stated limitation rather than a circular step. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained: measurement → parameter-free simulation → mode analysis. The only concerns are minor self-citation usage and the Eq. (4) definitional issue, so the circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard experimental techniques and the reciprocity-based simulation model. No free parameters are fitted to the measured gPL, which is the strongest point for non-circularity. The main assumptions are the reciprocity relation, random dipole orientation, dipole-truncated multipole expansion, and C2 symmetry reduction, all of which are either standard in nanophotonics or explicitly stated.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Lorentz reciprocity relates absorption (illumination) to emission for computing gPL from near-field intensities (Eq. 4).
    Used in the Methods subsection 'Simulations of Angle-Dependent gPL Maps' to derive gPL(k, lambda) from the near-field intensity of LCP and RCP plane-wave excitations.
  • domain assumption The molecular dipole orientations in the dye/PMMA layer are fully random.
    Stated in the Methods: 'The molecular dipole orientations are assumed to be fully random.' This justifies integrating the absolute square of the electric field over the whole emitting volume.
  • domain assumption Electromagnetic multipole decomposition truncated to electric and magnetic dipole terms is sufficient in the spectral range of interest.
    Invoked in the Discussion: 'We only consider the contribution of the electric and magnetic dipole moments, since previous studies indicate that the quadrupolar response extends beyond the spectral region.' The justification cites ref 55 by the same group.
  • standard math The C2 inversion symmetry of the dimer implies p = |p1| = |p2| and m = |m1| = |m2|, and only symmetric or antisymmetric pair configurations occur.
    Used in the Discussion to reduce the multipole analysis to a single nanorod with color-coded symmetric/antisymmetric character. This is a standard symmetry argument.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Robust Circularly Polarized Luminescence via Quasi-Bound States in the Continuum in Intrinsic Chiral Silicon Metasurfaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5OIGOA53

@misc{pith2026250818927,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Robust Circularly Polarized Luminescence via Quasi-Bound States in the Continuum in Intrinsic Chiral Silicon Metasurfaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5OIGOA53}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.18927}
}
abstract

We demonstrate a circularly polarized photoluminescence emission, with dissymmetry factors $g_\mathrm{PL}$ over 0.1, from achiral organic dye molecules by leveraging quasi-bound states in the continuum (quasi-BICs) and surface lattice resonances (SLRs) in intrinsic silicon chiral metasurfaces. We find that the $g_\mathrm{PL}$ associated with the quasi-BIC mode remains robust against variations in emission angle and dye thickness owing to its strong lateral field confinement. In contrast, the $g_\mathrm{PL}$ of the SLR mode exhibits sign inversion depending on the emission energy and dye layer thickness. The experimental results are supported by mode decomposition analysis, helicity density analysis, and near-field spatial distribution of the electric field. These findings illustrate the relevance of the emitter's layer thickness in optimizing the emission of circularly polarized light. They also elaborate on the robustness of chiral quasi-BICs, offering insights into chiral light-matter interactions and advancing the design of circularly polarized light-emitting devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.18927 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Chiral metasurfaces formed by arrays of silicon nanorod dimers. (a) Scheme of one [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Photoluminescence (PL) analysis for three metasurfaces of nanorod dimers with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. PL dissymmetry factor of the chiral metasurfaces with a 220 nm thick layer of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Angle-dispersive mode contribution maps simulated along [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: PL dissymmetry factors of the chiral metasurfaces spin-coated with a 380 nm thick [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Circularly polarized luminescence: a review of experimental and theoretical aspects

    Longhi, G.; Castiglioni, E.; Koshoubu, J.; Mazzeo, G.; Abbate, S. Circularly polarized luminescence: a review of experimental and theoretical aspects. Chirality 2016, 28, 696–707

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    Chirality in light–matter interaction.Adv

    Lininger, A.; Palermo, G.; Guglielmelli, A.; Nicoletta, G.; Goel, M.; Hinczewski, M.; Strangi, G. Chirality in light–matter interaction.Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2107325

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Chiral quantum optics.Nature 2017, 541, 473–480

    Lodahl, P.; Mahmoodian, S.; Stobbe, S.; Rauschenbeutel, A.; Schneeweiss, P.; Volz, J.; Pichler, H.; Zoller, P. Chiral quantum optics.Nature 2017, 541, 473–480

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Nanophotonic platforms for enhanced chiral sensing.ACS Photonics 2018, 5, 2669–2675

    Mohammadi, E.; Tsakmakidis, K.; Askarpour, A.-N.; Dehkhoda, P.; Tavakoli, A.; Al- tug, H. Nanophotonic platforms for enhanced chiral sensing.ACS Photonics 2018, 5, 2669–2675

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    F.; Decleva, P.; Lerner, G.; Cohen, O.; Ivanov, M.; Smirnova, O

    Ayuso, D.; Neufeld, O.; Ordonez, A. F.; Decleva, P.; Lerner, G.; Cohen, O.; Ivanov, M.; Smirnova, O. Synthetic chiral light for efficient control of chiral light–matter interaction. Nat. Photonics 2019, 13, 866–871

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    I.; Lakhwani, G.; Rasmita, A.; Liu, X.; Sar- gent, E

    Long, G.; Sabatini, R.; Saidaminov, M. I.; Lakhwani, G.; Rasmita, A.; Liu, X.; Sar- gent, E. H.; Gao, W. Chiral-perovskite optoelectronics.Nat. Rev. Mater.2020, 5, 423– 439

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    C.; Lim, Y.; An, S.-C.; Woo, B

    Seo, I. C.; Lim, Y.; An, S.-C.; Woo, B. H.; Kim, S.; Son, J. G.; Yoo, S.; Park, Q.- H.; Kim, J. Y.; Jun, Y. C. Circularly polarized emission from organic–inorganic hybrid perovskites via chiral fano resonances.ACS Nano 2021, 15, 13781–13793. 18

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    S.; Antonov, A

    Kim, S.; An, S.-C.; Kim, Y.; Shin, Y. S.; Antonov, A. A.; Seo, I. C.; Woo, B. H.; Lim, Y.; Gorkunov, M. V.; Kivshar, Y. S.; Kim, J. Y.; Jun, Y. C. Chiral electroluminescence from thin-film perovskite metacavities.Sci. Adv. 2023, 9, eadh0414

    work page 2023

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    Advances on broadband and resonant chiral metasurfaces.npj Nanophoton

    Deng, Q.-M.; Li, X.; Hu, M.-X.; Li, F.-J.; Li, X.; Deng, Z.-L. Advances on broadband and resonant chiral metasurfaces.npj Nanophoton. 2024, 1, 20

    2024

  2. [10]

    Han, J.; Jang, H.; Lim, Y.; Kim, S.; Lee, J.; Jun, Y. C. Chiral Emission from Optical Metasurfaces and Metacavities.Adv. Photonics Res.2024, 5, 2400060

    2024

  3. [11]

    Automatically Aligned and Environment-Friendly Twisted Stacking Terahertz Chiral Metasurface with Giant Cir- cular Dichroism for Rapid Biosensing.ACS Appl

    Wang, Z.; Huang, J.; Liu, W.; Xiong, C.; Hu, B. Automatically Aligned and Environment-Friendly Twisted Stacking Terahertz Chiral Metasurface with Giant Cir- cular Dichroism for Rapid Biosensing.ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces.2024, 16, 15193– 15201

    2024

  4. [12]

    Anisotropic dissymmetry factor, g: Theoretical investigation on single molecule chirop- tical spectroscopy.J

    Wakabayashi, M.; Yokojima, S.; Fukaminato, T.; Shiino, K.-i.; Irie, M.; Nakamura, S. Anisotropic dissymmetry factor, g: Theoretical investigation on single molecule chirop- tical spectroscopy.J. Phys. Chem. A2014, 118, 5046–5057

  5. [13]

    A.; Kitzmann, W

    VanOrman, Z. A.; Kitzmann, W. R.; Reponen, A.-P. M.; Deshpande, T.; Jöbsis, H. J.; Feldmann, S. Chiral light–matter interactions in solution-processable semiconductors. Nat. Rev. Chem.2025, 1–16

    2025

  6. [14]

    G.; Liu, S

    Liang, Y.; Zhang, F.; Gu, J.; Huang, X. G.; Liu, S. Integratable quarter-wave plates enable one-way angular momentum conversion.Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24959

    2016

  7. [15]

    Okazaki, Y.; Kimura, M.; Hachiya, K.; Sagawa, T. Luminescence-based circular polar- ization convertors: polarization conversion of linearly polarized photoluminescence from one-dimensionally aligned quantum rods using retardation films. J. Mater. Chem. C 2023, 11, 935–942. 19

    2023

  8. [16]

    Circularly polarized luminescence from organic micro-/nano-structures.Light Sci

    Deng, Y.; Wang, M.; Zhuang, Y.; Liu, S.; Huang, W.; Zhao, Q. Circularly polarized luminescence from organic micro-/nano-structures.Light Sci. Appl.2021, 10, 76

    2021

  9. [17]

    J.; Freedman, D

    Crassous, J.; Fuchter, M. J.; Freedman, D. E.; Kotov, N. A.; Moon, J.; Beard, M. C.; Feldmann, S. Materials for chiral light control.Nat. Rev. Mater.2023, 8, 365–371

    2023

  10. [18]

    Greenfield,J.L.; Wade,J.; Brandt,J.R.; Shi,X.; Penfold,T.J.; Fuchter,M.J.Pathways to increase the dissymmetry in the interaction of chiral light and chiral molecules.Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 8589–8602

    2021

  11. [19]

    Plasmonic and Photonic Enhancement of Chiral Near-Fields.Laser Photonics Rev.2022, 16, 2200035

    Hu, L.; Sun, Z.; Nie, Y.; Huang, Y.; Fang, Y. Plasmonic and Photonic Enhancement of Chiral Near-Fields.Laser Photonics Rev.2022, 16, 2200035

    2022

  12. [20]

    E.; Morgado, T

    Lannebère, S.; Fernandes, D. E.; Morgado, T. A.; Silveirinha, M. G. Chiral-Gain Pho- tonics. Laser Photonics Rev.2024, 2400881

    2024

  13. [21]

    Chiral plasmonics.Sci

    Hentschel, M.; Schäferling, M.; Duan, X.; Giessen, H.; Liu, N. Chiral plasmonics.Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1602735

    2017

  14. [22]

    Self-assembled inorganic chiral superstructures

    Lv, J.; Gao, X.; Han, B.; Zhu, Y.; Hou, K.; Tang, Z. Self-assembled inorganic chiral superstructures. Nat. Rev. Chem.2022, 6, 125–145

    2022

  15. [23]

    B.; Jo, K.; Jariwala, D

    Anantharaman, S. B.; Jo, K.; Jariwala, D. Exciton–photonics: from fundamental science to applications.ACS Nano 2021, 15, 12628–12654

    2021

  16. [24]

    Plasmon–exciton strong coupling effects of the chiral hybridnanostructuresbasedontheplexcitonicBorn–Kuhnmodel

    Wu, F.; Li, N.; Ding, B.; Zhang, W. Plasmon–exciton strong coupling effects of the chiral hybridnanostructuresbasedontheplexcitonicBorn–Kuhnmodel. ACS Photonics2023, 10, 1356–1366

  17. [25]

    Optical communica- tion of spin information between light emitting diodes.Appl

    Farshchi, R.; Ramsteiner, M.; Herfort, J.; Tahraoui, A.; Grahn, H. Optical communica- tion of spin information between light emitting diodes.Appl. Phys. Lett.2011, 98

    2011

  18. [26]

    Li,Y.; Liu,W.; Li,Z.; Cheng,H.; Chen,S.Metasurface-EmpoweredQuantumPhotonics. Adv. Photonics Res.2024, 2300352. 20

    2024

  19. [27]

    Chirality tuning and reversing with resonant phase-change meta- surfaces

    Sha, X.; Du, K.; Zeng, Y.; Lai, F.; Yin, J.; Zhang, H.; Song, B.; Han, J.; Xiao, S.; Kivshar, Y.; Song, Q. Chirality tuning and reversing with resonant phase-change meta- surfaces. Sci. Adv. 2024, 10, eadn9017

    2024

  20. [28]

    Shaping the Fluorescent Emission by Lattice Resonances in Plasmonic Crystals of Nanoantennas.Phys

    Vecchi, G.; Giannini, V.; Gómez Rivas, J. Shaping the Fluorescent Emission by Lattice Resonances in Plasmonic Crystals of Nanoantennas.Phys. Rev. Lett.2009, 102, 146807

    2009

  21. [29]

    R.; Odom, T

    Wang, D.; Guan, J.; Hu, J.; Bourgeois, M. R.; Odom, T. W. Manipulating light–matter interactions in plasmonic nanoparticle lattices.Acc. Chem. Res.2019, 52, 2997–3007

    2019

  22. [30]

    G.; Kabashin, A

    Kravets, V. G.; Kabashin, A. V.; Barnes, W. L.; Grigorenko, A. N. Plasmonic surface lattice resonances: a review of properties and applications.Chem. Rev.2018, 118, 5912– 5951

    2018

  23. [31]

    I.; Koenderink, A

    Cotrufo, M.; Osorio, C. I.; Koenderink, A. F. Spin-Dependent Emission from Arrays of Planar Chiral Nanoantennas Due to Lattice and Localized Plasmon Resonances.ACS Nano 2016, 10, 3389–3397

    2016

  24. [32]

    Observation of a Giant Nonlinear Chiro-Optical Response in Planar Plasmonic–Photonic Metasurfaces.Adv

    Wang, F.; Harutyunyan, H. Observation of a Giant Nonlinear Chiro-Optical Response in Planar Plasmonic–Photonic Metasurfaces.Adv. Opt. Mater.2019, 7, 1900744

    2019

  25. [33]

    I.; Polavarapu, L.; Mihi, A

    Mendoza-Carreño, J.; Molet, P.; Otero-Martínez, C.; Alonso, M. I.; Polavarapu, L.; Mihi, A. Nanoimprinted 2D-chiral perovskite nanocrystal metasurfaces for circularly polarized photoluminescence.Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2210477

    2023

  26. [34]

    L.; Heinz, T

    Liu,Y.; Lau,S.C.; Cheng,W.-H.; Johnson,A.; Li,Q.; Simmerman,E.; Karni,O.; Hu,J.; Liu, F.; Brongersma, M. L.; Heinz, T. F.; Dionne, J. A. Controlling valley-specific light emission from monolayer MoS2 with achiral dielectric metasurfaces.Nano Lett. 2023, 23, 6124–6131

    2023

  27. [35]

    I.; Polavarapu, L.; Mihi, A

    Fiuza-Maneiro, N.; Mendoza-Carreño, J.; Gómez-Graña, S.; Alonso, M. I.; Polavarapu, L.; Mihi, A. Inducing Efficient and Multiwavelength Circularly Polarized 21 Emission From Perovskite Nanocrystals Using Chiral Metasurfaces.Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2413967

    2024

  28. [36]

    I.; Di Stasio, F.; Mihi, A

    Mendoza-Carreño, J.; Bertucci, S.; Garbarino, M.; Cirignano, M.; Fiorito, S.; Lova, P.; Garriga, M.; Alonso, M. I.; Di Stasio, F.; Mihi, A. A single nanophotonic platform for producing circularly polarized white light from non-chiral emitters.Nat. Commun.2024, 15, 10443

    2024

  29. [37]

    K.; Odom, T

    Hong, C.; Zheng, Z.; Patel, S. K.; Odom, T. W. High-Chirality Polariton Lasing from Symmetry-Broken Plasmonic Lattices.ACS Nano 2025,

    2025

  30. [38]

    A.; Mendoza-Carreño, J.; Garriga, M.; Alonso, M

    Qi, X.; Pérez, L. A.; Mendoza-Carreño, J.; Garriga, M.; Alonso, M. I.; Mihi, A. Chiral plasmonic superlattices from template-assisted assembly of achiral nanoparticles.Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 1–11

    2025

  31. [39]

    Bound states in the continuum in photonics

    Marinica, D.; Borisov, A.; Shabanov, S. Bound states in the continuum in photonics. Phys. Rev. Lett.2008, 100, 183902

    2008

  32. [40]

    W.; Zhen, B.; Stone, A

    Hsu, C. W.; Zhen, B.; Stone, A. D.; Joannopoulos, J. D.; Soljačić, M. Bound states in the continuum.Nat. Rev. Mater.2016, 1, 1–13

    2016

  33. [41]

    V.; Antonov, A

    Gorkunov, M. V.; Antonov, A. A.; Kivshar, Y. S. Metasurfaces with maximum chirality empowered by bound states in the continuum.Phys. Rev. Lett.2020, 125, 093903

    2020

  34. [42]

    Chiral quasi-bound states in the continuum.Phys

    Overvig, A.; Yu, N.; Alù, A. Chiral quasi-bound states in the continuum.Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, 126, 073001

    2021

  35. [43]

    Chiral emission from resonant meta- surfaces

    Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.; Han, J.; Kivshar, Y.; Song, Q. Chiral emission from resonant meta- surfaces. Science 2022, 377, 1215–1218

    2022

  36. [44]

    Shi, T.; Deng, Z.-L.; Geng, G.; Zeng, X.; Zeng, Y.; Hu, G.; Overvig, A.; Li, J.; Qiu, C.- W.; Alù, A.; Kivshar, X., Yuri S.and Li Planar chiral metasurfaces with maximal and 22 tunable chiroptical response driven by bound states in the continuum.Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 4111

    2022

  37. [45]

    Enhancing circularly polarized emission by a planar chiral dielectric metasurface.Adv

    Sun, Y.; Hu, Z.; Shi, K.; Guo, T.; Xing, Y.; Jin, Y.; He, S. Enhancing circularly polarized emission by a planar chiral dielectric metasurface.Adv. Opt. Mater.2023, 11, 2300197

    2023

  38. [46]

    C.; An, S.-C.; Kim, Y.; Park, C.; Woo, B

    Lim, Y.; Seo, I. C.; An, S.-C.; Kim, Y.; Park, C.; Woo, B. H.; Kim, S.; Park, H.-R.; Jun, Y. C. Maximally chiral emission via chiral quasibound states in the continuum. Laser Photonics Rev.2023, 17, 2200611

    2023

  39. [47]

    C.; Berghuis, A

    Liang, M.; Andreani, L. C.; Berghuis, A. M.; Pura, J. L.; Murai, S.; Dong, H.; Sánchez- Gil, J. A.; Gómez Rivas, J. Tailoring directional chiral emission from molecules coupled to extrinsic chiral quasi-bound states in the continuum.Photonics Res.2024, 12, 2462– 2473

    2024

  40. [48]

    S.; Nauman, A.; Lee, J.-W.; Kim, H.-R

    Khaliq, H. S.; Nauman, A.; Lee, J.-W.; Kim, H.-R. Recent progress on plasmonic and dielectricchiralmetasurfaces: fundamentals, designstrategies, andimplementation. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2023, 11, 2300644

    2023

  41. [49]

    Kim, S.; Jang, H.; Han, J.; Lee, J.; Jun, Y. C. Ultranarrowband Chiral Absorbers in the Visible Region Based on Brillouin Zone Folding Metasurfaces.Nano Lett. 2025,

    2025

  42. [50]

    G.; Yablonskii, A.; Muljarov, E.; Gippius, N

    Tikhodeev, S. G.; Yablonskii, A.; Muljarov, E.; Gippius, N. A.; Ishihara, T. Quasiguided modes and optical properties of photonic crystal slabs.Phys. Rev. B2002, 66, 045102

  43. [51]

    D.; Soljačić, M.; Shapira, O

    Lee, J.; Zhen, B.; Chua, S.-L.; Qiu, W.; Joannopoulos, J. D.; Soljačić, M.; Shapira, O. Observation and Differentiation of Unique High-Q Optical Resonances Near Zero Wave Vector in Macroscopic Photonic Crystal Slabs.Phys. Rev. Lett.2012, 109, 067401

    2012

  44. [52]

    J.; Abujetas, D

    van Hoof, N. J.; Abujetas, D. R.; Ter Huurne, S. E.; Verdelli, F.; Timmermans, G. C.; Sánchez-Gil, J. A.; Rivas, J. G. Unveiling the symmetry protection of bound states in the continuum with terahertz near-field imaging.ACS Photonics 2021, 8, 3010–3016. 23

    2021

  45. [53]

    Low-Contrast BIC Metasurfaces with Quality Factors Exceeding 100,000.Nano Lett

    Watanabe, K.; Nagao, T.; Iwanaga, M. Low-Contrast BIC Metasurfaces with Quality Factors Exceeding 100,000.Nano Lett. 2024,

    2024

  46. [54]

    R.; van Hoof, N.; Sanchez-Gil, J

    ter Huurne, S.; Abujetas, D. R.; van Hoof, N.; Sanchez-Gil, J. A.; Gómez Rivas, J. Direct Observation of Lateral Field Confinement in Symmetry-Protected THz Bound States in the Continuum.Adv. Opt. Mater.2023, 11, 2202403

    2023

  47. [55]

    L.; Castillo López de Larrinzar, B.; Liang, M.; García-Martín, A.; Gómez Ri- vas, J.; Sánchez-Gil, J

    Pura, J. L.; Castillo López de Larrinzar, B.; Liang, M.; García-Martín, A.; Gómez Ri- vas, J.; Sánchez-Gil, J. A. Superchiral light emerging from bound states in the continuum in metasurfaces of Si nanorod dimers.ACS Photonics 2024, 11, 4090–4100

    2024

  48. [56]

    Novotny, L.; Hecht, B.Principles of nano-optics; Cambridge university press, 2012

    2012

  49. [57]

    Dual control of enhanced quasi-bound states in the continuum emission from resonant c-si metasurfaces.Nano Lett

    Zhang, Z.; Xu, C.; Liu, C.; Lang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Li, M.; Lu, W.; Chen, Z.; Wang, C.; Wang, S.; Li, X. Dual control of enhanced quasi-bound states in the continuum emission from resonant c-si metasurfaces.Nano Lett. 2023, 23, 7584–7592

    2023

  50. [58]

    Liang,Y.; Tsai,D.P.; Kivshar,Y.Fromlocaltononlocalhigh-Qplasmonicmetasurfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett.2024, 133, 053801

    2024

  51. [59]

    B.; Reinhardt, C.; Evlyukhin, E.; Chichkov, B

    Evlyukhin, A. B.; Reinhardt, C.; Evlyukhin, E.; Chichkov, B. N. Multipole analysis of light scattering by arbitrary-shaped nanoparticles on a plane surface.J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2013, 30, 2589

    2013

  52. [60]

    An electromagnetic multipole expan- sion beyond the long-wavelength approximation.Opt

    Alaee, R.; Rockstuhl, C.; Fernandez-Corbaton, I. An electromagnetic multipole expan- sion beyond the long-wavelength approximation.Opt. Commun. 2018, 407, 17–21

    2018

  53. [61]

    T.; Shendre, S.; Durmusoglu, E

    Wu, M.; Ha, S. T.; Shendre, S.; Durmusoglu, E. G.; Koh, W. K.; Abujetas, D. R.; Sánchez-Gil, J. A.; Paniagua-Domínguez, R.; Demir, H. V.; Kuznetsov, A. I. Room- Temperature Lasing in Colloidal Nanoplatelets via Mie-Resonant Bound States in the Continuum. Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 6...

    2020

  54. [62]

    de Larrinzar, B. C. L.; Lanzillotti-Kimura, N.; García-Martín, A. Interaction effects in chiral acoustoplasmonic nanostructures. Nanophotonics X. 2024; pp 46–50

    2024

  55. [63]

    A.; Gómez-Rivas, J

    Ramezani, M.; Lozano, G.; Verschuuren, M. A.; Gómez-Rivas, J. Modified emission of extended light emitting layers by selective coupling to collective lattice resonances.Phys. Rev. B 2016, 94, 125406

    2016

  56. [64]

    A.; Tartakovskii, I

    Maksimov, A. A.; Tartakovskii, I. I.; Filatov, E. V.; Lobanov, S. V.; Gippius, N. A.; Tikhodeev, S. G.; Schneider, C.; Kamp, M.; Maier, S.; Höfling, S.; Kulakovskii, V. D. Circularly polarized light emission from chiral spatially-structured planar semiconductor microcavities. ...

  57. [65]

    Cen, M.; Liu, J.; Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Cai, W.; Cheng, M.; Kong, D.; Tang, X.; Cao, T.; Lu, Y.-Q.; Liu, Y. J. Chirally Selective and Switchable Luminescence from Achiral Quan- tumEmittersonSuspendedTwistedStackingMetasurfaces. ACS Nano2024,18, 20556– 20566. 25 TOC Graphic 26

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.