Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 37 references

Modal Geometry Governs Proteoform Dynamics

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that conserved modal curvature, not raw energy alone, dictates which proteoform transitions happen and in what order, with least-action paths selected on a Boolean lattice.

desk verdict Ambitious but unsupported: the universal geometric law is a tautology and the headline regression is circular, though the GAPDH bitwise PDE weights are a concrete, testable seed. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.20004 v2 pith:BQ4TMC3B submitted 2025-08-27 q-bio.BM

James N. Cobley This is my paper · ORCID
classification q-bio.BM
keywords proteoformdynamicsmodalmanifoldcurvaturecysteineoxidationGAPDHleast-actiongeodesicsRicciflowpost-translationalmodification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish a field-theoretic law for proteoform dynamics, the stepwise transitions between distinct molecular variants of a protein. It proposes four axioms: possible states form a Boolean lattice, total occupancy is conserved, only single-site changes occur, and real molecular occupancy and shape project into the lattice as a conserved curvature field. The central claim is that this curvature governs which transition happens next by making activation energy relative: it distinguishes otherwise equal moves and selects least-action geodesics. If correct, the theory would predict preferred oxidation orders, such as GAPDH oxidizing Cys152 first and reaching the fully oxidized 111 state along the path 000 to 100 to 110 to 111. A reader should care because the framework offers a geometric explanation for path dependence, hysteresis, and entropy in post-translational modification dynamics, where standard statistical mechanics treats the state space as flat.

What carries the argument

The central object is the modal manifold, the Boolean hypercube whose vertices are all possible proteoform states, equipped with a conserved scalar curvature field defined as a zero-sum Laplacian of occupancy and shape. This curvature is the mechanism that differentiates iso-potential transitions: in the MGF field equation, curvature acts as a geometric penalty, and least-action selection on the lattice chooses shortest Hamming paths such as 000 to 100 to 110 to 111. Supporting machinery includes the four axioms, PDE-derived bitwise weights from the atomic structure, and a bounded Ricci-flow degeneracy that quantifies oscillations between ordered and chaotic occupancy distributions.

What would settle it

Watch single GAPDH molecules as they oxidize: the model predicts Cys152 is modified first and the fully oxidized 111 state is reached mainly through 000 to 100 to 110 to 111; if a different first cysteine or a different dominant route is observed, the theory's core claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

MGF Theory asserts that proteoform dynamics is governed by conserved modal curvature. On the modal manifold of all possible modification states, each mode is one configuration, e.g., the eight cysteine redox states of GAPDH from 000 to 111. Axioms one through three fix the lattice structure, volume conservation, and first-order Hamming-1 transitions. Axiom four defines curvature as a zero-sum Laplacian of occupancy and shape, so total curvature always vanishes. The MGF field equation adds a curvature penalty to the energy cost and entropy gain of a transition: concentrated occupancy creates wells that suppress transitions, while distributed occupancy flattens the landscape and facilitates mo

Load-bearing premise

The argument stands on the premise that the curvature computed from a molecule's occupancy and shape is a physical agent that changes transition rates, rather than merely a mathematical summary of the occupancy itself.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the theory is right, activation-energy barriers in proteoform networks are not fixed: they shift as occupancy redistributes curvature, producing hysteresis and path-dependent histories.
  • For GAPDH specifically, the theory predicts Cys152 oxidizes first and full oxidation traverses 000 to 100 to 110 to 111, giving the hyperoxidized 111 mode a definite preferred route.
  • If curvature governs transitions, moves with equal energy cost are distinguished geometrically, so no extra energy scale is needed to explain why one modification site is favored over another.
  • The same axioms apply to any number of modification sites and any post-translational modification basis, so preferred geodesics should exist for tyrosine phosphorylation, lysine acetylation, and other proteoform systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • My extension: the total-curvature identity sum zero holds for any occupancy because the graph Laplacian has zero-sum rows; the theory's physical content therefore depends on whether the curvature field itself, rather than the occupancy it is derived from, changes transition rates.
  • My extension: the Poisson and Dirichlet-energy recipe can be treated as a general predictor of oxidation order; applying it to other multi-cysteine proteins with known experimental oxidation hierarchies would either generalize or localize the GAPDH result.
  • My extension: the predicted Ricci-flow oscillations imply proteoform populations should show wave-like spreading in time, so time-resolved measurements of modification-state distributions could look for periodic ordering and disordering of occupancy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes 'Modal Geometric Field (MGF) Theory' for proteoform dynamics. Four axioms define the proteoform state space as a Boolean lattice (Axiom 1), impose volume invariance (Axiom 2), restrict transitions to Hamming-1 moves (Axiom 3), and introduce a graph-Laplacian 'curvature' field that is claimed to be a conserved geometric quantity controlling transitions (Axiom 4). The central field equation couples an energy term, this curvature, and an entropy term. The manuscript reports simulations of the resulting action integral, claims that curvature and anisotropy significantly 'shape' the action, analyzes geodesics and commutator algebras, and presents a GAPDH case study in which PDE-derived bitwise weights predict Cys152 as the primary oxidation site and give an activation energy near an empirical value. The paper concludes that modal geometry governs proteoform dynamics universally and scale-invariantly.

Significance. If the central claims were correct, the paper would offer a new, universal geometric framework for proteoform dynamics, with concrete predictions such as the preferred GAPDH oxidation pathway 000 → 100 → 110 → 111. Strengths include the clear presentation of the Boolean/combinatorial state space, the availability of the Julia source code, and the attempt to connect a geometric model to a specific experimental system. However, the load-bearing evidence is not independent: the 'conservation of curvature' is a mathematical identity of the graph Laplacian, the regression showing that curvature predicts the action is circular because the action includes the same curvature and anisotropy terms as additive components, and the GAPDH activation-energy comparison relies on an unconstrained coupling constant. At present the manuscript does not establish the claimed geometric governance; the central law is asserted and then fitted rather than tested.

major comments (5)
  1. [The MGF Theory Field Equation (p. 5–6)] The field equation T_{i→j} = ΔE_{i→j}·exp[ρ(x_i)·ΔH1] − R(x_i) + ΔS is dimensionally inconsistent. ΔE is an energy, ΔS is an entropy (or an energy only if multiplied by T), and R(x_i) is defined in Axiom 4 as a graph Laplacian of a dimensionless occupancy/shape field, hence dimensionless. The three terms cannot be added in a physical equation. Moreover, the stationary condition ∑_{k=0}^R P(i→j)·T_{i→j}=0 is ill-defined: the summation index k does not appear in the summand, and T is not a probability. Because this equation is the central law of the paper, the manuscript does not provide a testable physical equation.
  2. [Conservation of Curvature (p. 10; Supplemental Axiom 4)] The 'conservation of curvature' is a tautology. With R = Lρ for the graph Laplacian L, the identity 1^T L = 0 implies ∑_x R(x) = 0 for every vector ρ at every instant. The text's own derivation, ∑ R = 1^T L ρ = 0, makes this explicit. This is the zero-sum property of the Laplacian, not a dynamical conservation law, and it does not depend on Axiom 2 or on any symmetry. The statement that 'curvature cannot be created or destroyed, only transported' therefore carries no physical content beyond the definition of R. The Noether analogy and the abstract's claim that conserved curvature governs dynamics are not established.
  3. [Modelling MGF Theory / Methods: Action integral (p. 6, p. 14)] The regression in Figure 2A is circular. The response is defined as 𝒜 = Σ_s[ΔS(s) + λ_R R(x_s)² + λ_A ||A(x_s)||²] in the main text and as 𝒜 = Σ_t[α_mass Σ|Δρ| + α_geom(⟨R²⟩ + ⟨||A||²⟩) + α_entropy S_deg] in Methods. The predictors in the regression are R and A, which appear additively inside the response. For any trajectory ensemble with nonzero variance in R or A, the general linear model must return nonzero coefficients; the sign of each coefficient is determined by covariance with the other additive terms. Figure 2A therefore cannot support the conclusion that 'geometry shaped proteoform dynamics'; it is a property of the estimator, not an empirical finding.
  4. [Curvature, Energy, and Entropy / Numerical example (p. 12–13)] The GAPDH activation-energy comparison is not a parameter-free prediction. The text states a symmetric barrier of ≈33 kJ/mol per cysteine bit, then defines ΔG_eff^‡(b) = κ_modal |K|(1 − ln w_E(b)) with |K| ≈ 33 kJ/mol. For Cys152 (w_E = 0.388) this gives roughly 64 kJ/mol, not the claimed 76 kJ/mol. To obtain 76 kJ/mol one must choose κ_modal ≈ 1.18, an unstated free parameter. Since κ_modal is not determined independently, the reported agreement with the empirical 67 kJ/mol is a fit, not a validation of the theory.
  5. [The Geometric Primitive (p. 11–12)] The geometric-primitive calculation depends on several arbitrary choices: Gaussian kernel width σ = 4.0 Å, cutoff r_c = 6.5 Å, Cα-only representation, the specific construction of the substrate Laplacian, the choice of source terms, and rescaling of Forman-Ricci curvature. No sensitivity analysis is provided. This calculation is the only molecular-level input that breaks the iso-potential symmetry of the three cysteine bits, so the prediction that Cys152 is the geometric primitive (000 → 100) is load-bearing. Without a demonstration that the result is robust to these modeling choices, the prediction may be an artifact of the chosen parameters.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Axiom 3 vs. simulations] Axiom 3 defines single-molecule occupancy as ρ(x)=1 at the occupied mode and 0 elsewhere, but the simulations evolve 100 molecules per run and use fractional occupancies. The relationship between the single-molecule axiom and the ensemble-level field equation needs clarification.
  2. [Field equation notation] The underbrace 'Energy' covers only ΔE·exp[...], while −R(x_i) and +ΔS are also treated as energy-like terms. The notation suggests that R and ΔS are not energy contributions, which is inconsistent with the dimensional issue noted above.
  3. [Ricci Flow definitions] Two definitions of Φ(ρ) are given: Φ(ρ)=max_{x,y}|R(x)−R(y)| and Φ(ρ)=∑(ρ_x−1/|ℳ|)². These are not equivalent. The text calls them 'two equivalent forms' (p. 15), which is incorrect.
  4. [Scale-invariance and universality] The scale-invariance test consists of running the same code for different R values. This does not test universality across different PTM types or protein structures, nor does it establish that the same κ_modal applies across systems.
  5. [References and typos] The GAPDH empirical oxidation claim cites references [22–24], but the mapping from text citations to the reference list is inconsistent (e.g., references 24–27 are about unrelated topics). There are also typos: 'Erying' for Eyring, 'In' for ln, and 'communicative' for commutative.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 8.0 of 10

Conservation is definitional, the regression evidence is tautological, and the GAPDH activation energy is calibrated by a free coupling constant.

  1. self definitional [Axiom 4, Results: 'Occupancy Curves the Modal Manifold'; Methods: 'Conservation of Curvature']
    "Formally, if ℱ: (𝜌, 𝜑) ↦ 𝑅 denotes this projection, then curvature is 𝑅(𝑥) = (𝐿𝜑𝜎)(𝑥), ∑ 𝑅(𝑥) = 0 ... where 𝜎 𝐺(𝜌, 𝜑) encodes occupancy and shape, and 𝐿𝜑 is a symmetric zero-sum Laplacian. Hence, curvature cannot be created or destroyed: it is the conserved geometric expression of molecular identity"

    A zero-sum Laplacian satisfies 1^T L = 0 algebraically, so ∑ R(x) = 0 for every σ by construction. The claimed Noether-like conservation law is an identity of the definition, not a derived physical conservation. The Methods section even states 'Since 𝐿⊺1=0, total curvature vanishes for any occupancy' and then calls this a 'Noether-like discrete analogue.' Thus the central assertion that curvature is 'always conserved' is imposed by the chosen representation rather than demonstrated.

  2. self definitional [Results: 'Modelling MGF Theory'; Methods: 'Action integral']
    "To model the MGF equation, the stepwise action integral (𝒜) was defined as: 𝒜 = ∑[Δ𝑆(𝑠) + 𝜆𝑅𝑅(𝑥𝑠)2 + 𝜆𝐴‖𝐴(𝑥𝑠)‖2] ... Regression analysis revealed that geometry shaped proteoform dynamics (Figure 2A). High curvature suppressed 𝒜 (β = –1059.7, p < 1e–94), whereas directional anisotropy strongly amplified it (β = +2112.8, p < 1e–88). Hence, modal geometry governs proteoform dynamics."

    The action integral is defined to include squared curvature and squared anisotropy as additive components. Regressing 𝒜 on R and A then simply recovers the same terms that were put into 𝒜. The significant β coefficients are forced by construction; they cannot provide independent evidence that geometry 'shaped' dynamics. The empirical content reduces to the arbitrary λ/α weights chosen by the authors, so the conclusion is a tautology of the estimator rather than a discovery.

1 more flagged steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Results: 'Curvature, Energy, and Entropy'; Methods: 'Curvature & Energy']
    "∆𝐺𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑣‡ = 𝜅𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑙|𝐾𝑖𝑗|, Where 𝜅𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑙 is the geometric coupling constant (𝐽 ⋅ 𝑚𝑜𝑙−1). ... Numerical example: ... occupancy induced curvature produced a symmetric barrier height of ≈ 33 𝑘𝐽⋅𝑚𝑜𝑙−1 per cysteine bit. By construction, this value is the same for all three bits, since the curvature spectrum is invariant under axiom 4. ... Applied to Cys152, this equation yielded an activation energy of 76 𝑘𝐽⋅𝑚𝑜𝑙−1, which is congruent with 67 𝑘𝐽⋅𝑚𝑜𝑙−1 as computed from empirical kinetic data31."

    κ_modal is a free coupling constant; the paper provides no independent determination of it. The baseline barrier is explicitly stated to be fixed 'by construction', and the final 76 kJ/mol value is then called 'congruent' with the empirical 67 kJ/mol. Whether or not the numbers happen to agree, this is a calibration check, not a prediction: the energy scale and baseline are set by an unspecified constant, and the text even contains an internal inconsistency (Cys152's w_E gives ~64 kJ/mol, not 76, under the stated 33 kJ/mol baseline).

full rationale

The paper's central law—'curvature, which is always conserved, governs proteoform dynamics'—rests on two constructional identities and one calibration. First, curvature is defined as the output of a zero-sum Laplacian, so its global conservation is a mathematical identity (1^T L = 0), not an empirical law. Second, the simulation evidence for 'geometry shaped dynamics' comes from regressing the action integral on curvature and anisotropy, but the action integral was defined to include squared curvature and squared anisotropy terms; the regression merely rediscovers the construction. Third, the GAPDH activation-energy agreement relies on an unspecified coupling constant κ_modal, with the baseline barrier described as fixed 'by construction'; the 'prediction' is thus calibrated, not independent. The PDE-based bit weights and the empirically known oxidation-proneness of Cys152 retain some independent content, but they do not salvage the universal claim, which is not supported by any non-circular test. The paper's self-citations are not the main problem; the definitions and free parameters are.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The paper's conclusions rest mostly on definitions: the Boolean state count, probability conservation, and zero-sum Laplacian are standard or tautological. The physical content, the coupling of curvature to activation energy, is postulated and calibrated. The GAPDH-specific weights depend on hand-chosen graph parameters. Counts here reflect what the reader must accept without independent evidence.

free parameters (4)
  • kappa_modal = not stated; implied by symmetric barrier of about 33 kJ/mol
    Used to convert dimensionless modal curvature into kJ/mol. Without an independent estimate, the 76 kJ/mol prediction is a calibration outcome.
  • alpha_mass, alpha_geom, alpha_entropy = 0.01, 0.1, 0.1
    Hand-set weights in the action integral. They directly include the curvature and anisotropy terms later used as predictors in the regression.
  • Gaussian kernel parameters sigma and r_c = sigma = 4.0 Angstrom, r_c = 6.5 Angstrom
    The cutoff and width control the PDE bitwise weights. No sensitivity analysis is provided.
  • symmetric barrier height |K| per cysteine = about 33 kJ/mol
    Assigned by construction to the curvature spectrum before bitwise differentiation. This sets the energy scale for the later comparison.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Boolean lattice {0,1}^R enumerates all proteoform states
    Axiom 1; standard combinatorics using binomial coefficients.
  • standard math Probability mass over modes is conserved, sum rho = 1
    Axiom 2; standard stochastic conservation, with renormalization used in the SI for synthesis and degradation.
  • domain assumption Only Hamming distance 1 transitions are allowed
    Axiom 3; assumes multi-site changes always decompose sequentially, which may fail for concerted or simultaneous reactions.
  • ad hoc to paper Zero-sum graph Laplacian curvature is a conserved physical field that governs transitions
    Axiom 4 and the MGF field equation; the causal step from curvature to activation energy is postulated, not derived.
  • ad hoc to paper The modal manifold is non-symplectic because tangent spaces are {0}
    SI section 'Non-symplectic Modal Manifold'; a discrete set has no tangent bundle, so the statement is definitional rather than physical.
  • ad hoc to paper Scale invariance and universality across all R and all PTM types
    Conclusion and 'Scale-invariance'; asserted from R = 3 examples without proof.
invented entities (3)
  • Modal curvature R(x)
    purpose: Conserved geometric regulator said to govern least-action transitions and activation energy.
    Defined as a zero-sum Laplacian of occupancy; no direct experimental observable or independent measurement is provided.
  • Anisotropic fibre bundle A(x)
    purpose: Directional penalty in the ALIVE simulations.
    Introduced to encode local geometric heterogeneity; no biological handle is given.
  • Occupancy-induced metric deformation g = e^(2 sigma) g0
    purpose: Claims real occupancy reshapes the abstract modal geometry.
    Purely formal; not used directly in the numeric validation beyond the scalar field sigma.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Modal Geometry Governs Proteoform Dynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BQ4TMC3B

@misc{pith2026250820004,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Modal Geometry Governs Proteoform Dynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BQ4TMC3B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.20004}
}
read the original abstract

The fundamental laws governing proteoform dynamics have yet to be formulated. As a result, it is unclear how a specific proteoform, a distinct molecular variant of a protein, dynamically shapes its own future by evolving into new modes that exist only in potential until realised. Here, Modal Geometric Field (MGF) Theory couples real and abstract proteoform transitions through four axioms. Axioms 1 to 3 (invariant) dictate that only first-order transitions occur on the discrete, volume-invariant, non symplectic modal manifold. Axiom 4 (mutable) projects the occupancy and shape of a real, instantiated molecule into the modal manifold, generating occupancy-induced curvature. By coupling what is real to what is abstract, curvature, which is always conserved, governs proteoform dynamics by dictating the least-action modal transition. Because curvature distribution renders activation energy relative, barriers are mutable, and entropy emerges inevitably from curvature transport. This unification of energy, entropy, and curvature yields hysteresis, path dependence, fractal self similarity, and trajectories that oscillate between order and chaos. As a scale invariant and universal framework, MGF Theory reveals how modal geometry governs proteoform dynamics

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.20004 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. MGF Theory Axioms. A. Binomial theorem structured (1:3:3:1) Boolean lattice of proteoform modes in the combinatorics-enumerated R = 3 series. B. The modal manifold is volume-invariant. No matter how molecules redistribute—depicted as a change in size of the nodes in left vs. right—the volume of the hypercube remains invariant. C. Adjacency matrix of allowed (yellow) and barred (purple) first-order modal transitions.… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Modal Geometry Governs Proteoform Dynamics. A. Forest plot of regression coefficients ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Ricci-wave dynamics reveal ordered vs trapped trajectories. A-B. Time series of Ricci spread Φ(ρ) and corresponding Fourier spectra for a representative symmetric trajectory (top) and a trapped trajectory (bottom). Symmetric dynamics exhibit smooth oscillations with narrow spectral content, whereas trapped dynamics show irregular fluctuations and broadband spectral power. C. Transition adjacency matrices of the same… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Conservation of curvature. The bar plot series showing the distribution of curvature across and the total curvature across each instantiated modal occupancy. In this case, the occupied node carries positive curvature (+3), its three Hamming-1 neighbours are compensated…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021)

    2021

  2. [2]

    Smith, L. M. et al. Proteoform: a single term describing protein complexity. Nat Methods 10, 186–187 (2013)

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    Smith, L. M. & Kelleher, N. L. Proteoforms as the next proteomics currency. Science 359, 1106–1107 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    & Coorssen, J

    Carbonara, K., Andonovski, M. & Coorssen, J. R. Proteomes Are of Proteoforms: Embracing the Complexity. Proteomes 9, 38 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Burnum-Johnson, K. E. et al. New Views of Old Proteins: Clarifying the Enigmatic Proteome. Mol Cell Proteomics 21, 100254 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Aebersold, R. et al. How many human proteoforms are there? Nat Chem Biol 14, 206–214 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    N., Chatzinikolaou, P

    Cobley, J. N., Chatzinikolaou, P. N. & Schmidt, C. A. The Nonlinear Cysteine Redox Dynamics in the i-Space: A Proteoform-centric Theory of Redox Regulation. Redox Biol. 103523 (2025) doi:10.1016/j.redox.2025.103523

    work page arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Statistical Mechanics

    Huang, K. Statistical Mechanics. vol. 2nd Edition (Wiley-VCH, 1987)

    work page 1987

Show all 37 references
  1. [9]

    Die Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie

    Einstein, A. Die Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie. Ann Phys 49, 769–822 (1916)

    1916

  2. [10]

    Cobley, J. N. Oxiforms: Unique cysteine residue‐ and chemotype‐specified chemical combinations can produce functionally‐distinct proteoforms. Bioessays 45, (2023). 20

    2023

  3. [11]

    Cobley, J. N. Exploring the unmapped cysteine redox proteoform landscape. Am. J. Physiol.-Cell Physiol. (2024) doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00152.2024

    2024

  4. [12]

    Stanley, R. P. Enumerative Combinatorics. (2011). doi:10.1017/cbo9781139058520

    2011 doi

  5. [13]

    Parvez, S., Long, M. J. C., Poganik, J. R. & Aye, Y. Redox Signaling by Reactive Electrophiles and Oxidants. Chem Rev 118, 8798–8888 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    C., Keske, J

    Moser, C. C., Keske, J. M., Warncke, K., Farid, R. S. & Dutton, P. L. Nature of biological electron transfer. Nature 355, 796–802 (1992)

    1992

  7. [15]

    Cobley, J. N. Information, Geometry, and Chaos: Revealing Latent Cysteine Butterflies on Fractal Redox Shapes in the Proteomic Spectra. Preprints doi:10.20944/preprints202507.2120.v1

  8. [16]

    & Buhrman, H

    Bannink, T. & Buhrman, H. Quantum Pascal’s Triangle and Sierpinski’s carpet. arXiv (2017) doi:10.48550/arxiv.1708.07429

    2017 doi arXiv

  9. [17]

    Choudhary, D., Foster, K. R. & Uphoff, S. Chaos in a bacterial stress response. Curr. Biol. 33, 5404-5414.e9 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    Chaos: Making the New Science

    Gleick, J. Chaos: Making the New Science. (Penguin Books, 2008)

    2008

  11. [19]

    LYAPUNOV, A. M. The general problem of the stability of motion. Int. J. Control 55, 531–534 (1992)

    1992

  12. [20]

    B., Swinney, H

    Wolf, A., Swift, J. B., Swinney, H. L. & Vastano, J. A. Determining Lyapunov exponents from a time series. Phys. D: Nonlinear Phenom. 16, 285–317 (1985)

    1985

  13. [21]

    The entropy formula for the Ricci flow and its geometric applications

    Perelman, G. The entropy formula for the Ricci flow and its geometric applications. arXiv (2002) doi:10.48550/arxiv.math/0211159

    2002 doi arXiv

  14. [22]

    Mandelbrot, B. B. Fractals in physics: Squig clusters, diffusions, fractal measures, and the unicity of fractal dimensionality. J. Stat. Phys. 34, 895–930 (1984)

    1984

  15. [23]

    & Tavel, M

    Noether, E. & Tavel, M. A. Invariant Variation Problems. arXiv (2005) doi:10.48550/arxiv.physics/0503066

    2005 doi arXiv

  16. [24]

    R., Davies, M

    Glover, M. R., Davies, M. J. & Fuentes-Lemus, E. Oxidation of the active site cysteine residue of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase to the hyper-oxidized sulfonic acid form is favored under crowded conditions. Free Radic. Biol. Med. (2023) doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.20...

    2023 doi

  17. [25]

    Talwar, D. et al. The GAPDH redox switch safeguards reductive capacity and enables survival of stressed tumour cells. Nat Metabolism 1–17 (2023) doi:10.1038/s42255-023- 00781-3

    2023 doi

  18. [26]

    Ralser, M. et al. Dynamic rerouting of the carbohydrate flux is key to counteracting oxidative stress. J Biology 6, 10 (2007)

    2007

  19. [27]

    Peralta, D. et al. A proton relay enhances H2O2 sensitivity of GAPDH to facilitate metabolic adaptation. Nat Chem Biol 11, 156–163 (2015)

    2015

  20. [28]

    von et al

    Montfort, C. von et al. The role of GAPDH in the selective toxicity of CNP in melanoma cells. PLOS ONE 19, e0300718 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Brown, G. C. Bioenergetic myths of energy transduction in eukaryotic cells. Front. Mol. Biosci. 11, 1402910 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    Cobley, J. N. 50 shades of oxidative stress: A state-specific cysteine redox pattern hypothesis. Redox Biol. 67, 102936 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    The Activated Complex in Chemical Reactions

    Eyring, H. The Activated Complex in Chemical Reactions. J. Chem. Phys. 3, 107–115 (1935)

    1935

  24. [32]

    C., Peskin, A

    Winterbourn, C. C., Peskin, A. V., Kleffmann, T., Radi, R. & Pace, P. E. Carbon dioxide/bicarbonate is required for sensitive inactivation of mammalian glyceraldehyde-3- phosphate dehydrogenase by hydrogen peroxide. Proc National Acad Sci 120, e2221047120 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    Roesch, E. et al. Julia for biologists. Nat Methods 1–10 (2023) doi:10.1038/s41592-023- 01832-z. 21

    2023 doi

  26. [34]

    & Ulam, S

    Metropolis, N. & Ulam, S. The Monte Carlo Method. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 44, 335–341 (1949)

    1949

  27. [35]

    Kalos, M. H. & Whitlock, P. A. Monte Carlo Methods. (2022) doi:10.1002/9783527626212. Supplemental Information Axiom 1 Extended to Multinomial Theorem. The structure of the entire proteoform state space ( ΩP)—all theoretically possible molecular variants from a single copy of ...

    2022 doi

  28. [36]

    Horizontal Plane – Encodes PTM state-space structure using multinomial coefficients, stratifying proteoforms by their modification-level degeneracy

  29. [37]

    two-site jump

    Vertical Plane – Encodes sequence-level divergence, placing near -identical PS (e.g., isoforms or mutations) closer together. This multinomial Pascal simplex that structures the entire proteoform landscape across sequence variability and PTM states. All proteoform modes—whethe...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.