Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 300 references

Exploring the Relationship Between Swift Short Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows and their Host Galaxy Properties

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Short gamma-ray burst X-ray afterglows are systematically brighter in young, low-mass, star-forming galaxies, making X-ray luminosity the most reliable afterglow-based probe of a burst's host environment.

desk verdict A useful, well-built sample paper: the X-ray environmental trends (offset, age, mass, sSFR) are probably real, but the SFR headline is over-sold and the z=0.64 imputation is an untested selection risk. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.20156 v1 pith:DJVWGKXV submitted 2025-08-27 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA

Cristian Castrejon (Northwestern , CIERA) , Anya E. Nugent , Wen-fai Fong , Genevieve Schroeder , Alicia Rouco Escorial , Olivia Guerra This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.GA PACS 98.70.Rz
keywords shortgamma-rayburstsafterglowshostgalaxiesgalactocentricoffsetsstellarmassstar-formationrateX-rayluminosityneutron-starmergers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper assembles the largest sample of short gamma-ray bursts with multi-band afterglow data (150 events from Swift, 2005–2023), pairs each burst with uniformly modeled host-galaxy properties, and asks whether afterglow brightness records the environment around the burst. Its central claim is that it does, most clearly in X-rays: afterglows are statistically brighter in hosts that are younger, less massive, and more actively star-forming, and in bursts at small galactocentric offsets; radio afterglows are more detectable at small offsets; and optical afterglows are statistically linked only to star-formation rate. If the claim holds, X-ray afterglow luminosity becomes a practical probe of a short GRB's host environment and a predictor of which neutron-star merger hosts will produce detectable counterparts. The paper also finds that three known merger-driven long GRBs are unremarkable relative to the short-GRB population, and that GW170817's estimated on-axis afterglow sits in the faintest ~30%, consistent with its quiescent host.

What carries the argument

The common-time afterglow luminosity Lc, evaluated at a rest-frame time of 3 hours. X-ray values come from interpolating light curves within ±2.8 hours of that epoch, or from a power-law (L ∝ t^-1) extrapolation of the nearest detection; optical values come from power-law fits, single-point extrapolation, or the deepest available upper limit, with kilonova-contaminated epochs removed. This homogenized luminosity is the quantity whose distributions are compared across host-property splits using Anderson–Darling tests over 1000 Monte-Carlo CDF realizations (X-ray and radio) and a Wilcoxon logrank test for censored optical upper limits.

What would settle it

Restrict the analysis to short GRBs with spectroscopically confirmed redshifts and well-sampled X-ray light curves (no reliance on the t^-1 extrapolation or the z=0.64 assumption) and re-test the six host-property splits; if the trends weaken or vanish, the reported environmental scalings are selection artifacts. A second test: for the subset of events with direct circumburst-density constraints from broadband afterglow modeling, check whether X-ray Lc correlates with density — the environmental interpretation fails if no density-luminosity relation appears.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Working from 105–135 events with X-ray, optical, and radio follow-up, the authors compute an afterglow luminosity at a common rest-frame time of three hours (Lc) for each burst, then split the population at the median of six environmental properties: physical and host-normalized projected offset, stellar mass, star-formation rate, specific star-formation rate, and stellar-population age. Comparing the Lc distributions with Anderson–Darling tests over 1000 Monte Carlo CDF realizations (X-ray and radio) and a survival-analysis logrank test for censored optical data, they report that X-ray afterglows are statistically brighter in galaxies that are younger, less massive, and more actively star-f

Load-bearing premise

The computed rest-frame three-hour luminosities are unbiased comparators across the sample: extrapolating sparsely sampled light curves with a fixed decay slope and assigning the median redshift to events without measured redshifts must not systematically distort faint, poorly followed-up bursts in a way that mimics the reported host-property trends.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • X-ray afterglow luminosity can serve as a practical observational proxy for a short GRB host's age, mass, and star formation, even when the host galaxy itself is hard to characterize.
  • Follow-up of gravitational-wave-detected neutron-star mergers can use host properties to predict counterpart brightness: quiescent, massive, old hosts like that of GW170817 should yield faint afterglows, while star-forming hosts should yield brighter ones.
  • The scarcity of electromagnetic counterparts to GW mergers is expected if such events occur in GW170817-like environments; events at higher redshift, in more star-forming hosts, may be more detectable.
  • Radio follow-up of short GRBs has the best yield for bursts at small projected offsets from their host centers.
  • GRBs 060614, 211211A, and 230307A falling inside the short-GRB luminosity envelope supports a merger origin for these long-duration events, so their optical brightness is not evidence of a collapsar channel.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the optical band's lack of statistical significance is likely an observational-sensitivity effect, since optical afterglows fade below detection limits quickly; deep optical surveys should bring optical trends into agreement with X-ray ones, a testable prediction.
  • Editorial inference: because events without known redshift are assigned the sample median z≈0.64, and such events tend to be faint and poorly followed up, a restricted analysis using only spectroscopic redshifts would directly test whether the host-property trends survive selection effects.
  • Editorial inference: the environmental interpretation predicts that X-ray Lc should correlate with directly inferred circumburst density from broadband afterglow modeling of the same events; such a test would separate environment-driven trends from intrinsic energy variations.
  • Editorial inference: gravitational-wave counterpart search strategies could be sharpened by weighting candidates by host star-formation activity, since the paper's trends imply counterpart brightness scales with host sSFR.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper compiles a sample of 150 Swift short GRBs (plus three merger-driven long GRBs), pairs them with uniformly modeled host-galaxy properties from the BRIGHT repository, and computes X-ray and optical afterglow luminosities at a common rest-frame time of 3 hr. It then tests whether the luminosity distributions differ when the sample is split by physical/host-normalized offset, stellar mass, SFR, sSFR, and stellar population age, using Anderson-Darling tests on 1000 Monte Carlo draws (X-ray/radio) and log-rank tests with upper limits (optical). Radio afterglows are analyzed via detection versus non-detection. The central claims are that X-ray afterglows are brighter in younger, lower-mass, higher-sSFR hosts and at smaller offsets, that optical afterglows are brighter only in higher-SFR hosts, and that radio afterglows are more likely to be detected at small offsets.

Significance. If the X-ray luminosity trends are robust, this is one of the first statistically supported demonstrations that short GRB afterglow luminosity tracks the kiloparsec-scale environment, with direct implications for gravitational-wave counterpart follow-up strategies and for understanding the role of circumburst density. The compilation is large and uses a uniform host-galaxy catalog, and the Monte Carlo resampling approach explicitly propagates flux uncertainties into the CDF comparisons. These are genuine strengths. However, the central claims rest on a luminosity estimator that is sensitive to redshift imputation and to sampling-depth selection; the SFR split in particular is marginal and disappears at 10 hr. These issues currently limit the strength of the conclusions.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.1, Table B2] Approximately 40 of ~105 X-ray events are assigned z=0.64, indicating median-redshift imputation for unknown-redshift bursts. Since Lc scales as d_L(z)^2/(1+z) (with the t^-1 correction), an event at true z=0.3 is overestimated by roughly a factor of 4 in luminosity. If unknown-redshift bursts are preferentially located in low-mass, young, high-sSFR hosts (fainter hosts are harder to measure spectroscopically), the imputation could directly create or inflate the claimed environmental trends. The manuscript gives no sensitivity test using only events with measured redshifts, nor does it propagate redshift uncertainty into the CDF/AD analysis. Please repeat the CDF comparisons for the known-redshift subsample, or otherwise demonstrate that the imputation does not drive the results.
  2. [§4.3, Table 2] The X-ray SFR split yields 59.9% of pAD<0.05, barely above the paper's arbitrary 50% threshold, and the text notes that this trend is not statistically significant at δtc=10 hr. The abstract and conclusions nevertheless state 'higher active star formation' as a robust finding. The 'fraction of p-values < 0.05' criterion needs calibration; the authors should report the median p-value and the full distribution of p-values, and either temper the SFR claim or present it as weaker than the sSFR, mass, and age results (which are 96-100%). As written, the SFR result is too fragile to support the abstract's wording.
  3. [§3.1, §4.1] The X-ray analysis excludes upper limits, and 53/105 events require extrapolation with an assumed single power law LX ∝ t^-1, of which 14 have no data within ±2.83 hr of δtc. If poor sampling or non-detection correlates with faint afterglows in particular host types, the CDF comparisons could be selection artifacts. The manuscript does not quantify this. Please show that the main results hold for the interpolated-only subsample (scenario i), or include X-ray upper limits via survival analysis (as done for the optical band), or otherwise demonstrate that sampling depth and detection completeness do not drive the offsets, age, mass, and sSFR trends.
  4. [§3.1, §4] The Monte Carlo procedure draws 1000 Gaussian realizations of each Lc using fixed fiducial uncertainties (20% X-ray, 15% optical), and rejection of the null is declared when >50% of the 1000 p-values are <0.05. This threshold is ad hoc and uncalibrated, and it does not report effect sizes. For the 59.9% SFR result, the evidence is particularly fragile. I recommend reporting the median p-value for each split and the fraction of draws for which the median luminosities of the two groups are separated by more than the 68% intervals, which would provide a more interpretable measure of robustness.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table B2] Data errors: GRB 051210 lists SFR=434.96 M⊙/yr, which is unphysically high and likely a typo; GRB 080702A lists log(σ_LC,X)=44.099, which exceeds the reported log(LC,X)=41.033 by 3 dex and is internally inconsistent. Please verify these entries.
  2. [§4.3] The sentence describing the SFR result as rejecting the null hypothesis is too strong given the 59.9% fraction and the 10-hr non-detection; see major comment.
  3. [§5.1] The phrase 'trends that also scale with ISM density' is an interpretive claim; the paper does not measure ISM density directly. Please rephrase as an expectation or caveat.
  4. [Figures 3-6] The CDFs are difficult to read in grayscale; use distinct line styles or shaded bands for the high/low splits in addition to color.
  5. [§4.1] The 50% threshold for declaring a statistically distinct distribution should be justified with a reference or a calibration simulation; as written it is arbitrary.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: afterglow luminosities are derived from observed light curves and redshifts, not fitted to host properties; the reported correlations are empirical and not forced by construction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that X-ray (and optical/radio) afterglow properties correlate with host galaxy properties. The key derived quantity Lc is computed from observed afterglow fluxes, observed or imputed redshifts, and a common rest-frame time; it is not defined in terms of host stellar mass, SFR, sSFR, age, or offset. Host properties are taken from BRIGHT and related catalogs, which are self-authored but are external SED-fitting products that do not include afterglow luminosity as an input. The split points (e.g., 7 kpc, 1.66 re, SFR=1 M_sun/yr, log(M*)=9.7, age=0.8 Gyr) are cited medians from prior work, not parameters optimized to produce the claimed trend. The redshift imputation z=0.64 for events without measured redshifts is a potential source of selection bias, because unknown-z events could correlate with faint hosts, but this is a data-quality/statistical concern, not circularity: the claimed correlations are not reproduced by construction from that imputation. Self-citations to BRIGHT and to median decline-rate studies are load-bearing but constitute real observational or empirical input, not unverified assertions imported to force a conclusion. The GW170817 comparison uses an external jet model (Wu & MacFadyen 2019). No equation is defined in terms of the result it is used to predict, and no prediction reduces to a fitted parameter by construction. Therefore the derivation chain is self-contained with respect to the circularity patterns considered.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on (1) the validity of Lc at 3 hr as an unbiased brightness estimator, (2) the BRIGHT host SED properties being reliable, and (3) the chosen split medians and resampling rules. No new physical entities are introduced. The t^-1 decay slope, fiducial 20%/15% uncertainties, z=0.64 imputation, and median split values are the free inputs; they are reasonable but unverified for the poorly sampled subsets.

free parameters (5)
  • X-ray decay power-law index for extrapolation = -1
    Used to extrapolate Lc for events with ≤1 detection within δtc ± 2.83 hr (Section 3.1). Adopted from median short GRB decline rates in literature; not fit here, but an assumption that can bias Lc for poorly sampled events.
  • Fiducial X-ray luminosity uncertainty sigma_LX = 0.2 Lc
    Adopted as median uncertainty for all X-ray Lc values, including extrapolated events with no data within the window (Section 3.1). Underestimates true uncertainty for extrapolated cases.
  • Fiducial optical luminosity uncertainty sigma_Lopt = 0.15 Lc
    Adopted for two-point fits and single-detection events (Section 3.2).
  • Median redshift imputation = z ≈ 0.64
    Assigned to events without known redshift for luminosity conversions (Section 3.1), systematically affecting their Lc.
  • Split thresholds for environmental properties = 7 kpc, 1.66 re, 1 Msun/yr, 1e-10 /yr, 1e9.7 Msun, 0.8 Gyr
    Dividing points chosen at or near the BRIGHT sample medians (Sections 4.1-4.5). Since the sample overlaps heavily with BRIGHT, the splits are not fully independent of the data being tested.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Statistical tests (Anderson-Darling, logrank, Kaplan-Meier) and Gaussian resampling of Lc PDFs are valid for comparing the split populations.
    Used throughout Section 4 to produce the 1000-draw CDF comparisons and p-value fractions.
  • domain assumption Afterglow luminosity at a common rest-frame time is a valid comparator across events with different light-curve sampling.
    Core premise of the Lc method in Section 3; interpolation and t^-1 extrapolation assume no strong breaks or sampling biases near 3 hr.
  • domain assumption Synchrotron afterglow model with F_nu proportional to n0^1/2 for relevant frequency ranges (Granot & Sari 2002).
    Used in Sections 4 and 5 to interpret environmental trends as ISM density-driven brightness scaling.
  • domain assumption WMAP9 cosmology (H0 = 69.6, Omega_m = 0.286, Omega_vac = 0.714).
    Adopted at the end of Section 1 for luminosity distance and physical offset conversions.
  • domain assumption Host galaxy stellar population properties (M*, SFR, sSFR, tm) from BRIGHT SED modeling are uniformly reliable.
    All host property comparisons rest on these values (Sections 2 and 4), which come from the same group's prior work.
  • domain assumption Wu & MacFadyen (2019) on-axis model for GW170817 gives credible on-axis X-ray and optical luminosities.
    Used in Section 5.2 to place GW170817 on the short GRB luminosity distributions; model uncertainty is not propagated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exploring the Relationship Between Swift Short Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows and their Host Galaxy Properties." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DJVWGKXV

@misc{pith2026250820156,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exploring the Relationship Between Swift Short Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows and their Host Galaxy Properties},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DJVWGKXV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.20156}
}
read the original abstract

We present a comprehensive compilation of short-duration gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglows in the X-ray, optical, and radio bands, comprising 150 events discovered primarily by the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory over 2005-2023. We pair these observations with uniformly modeled host galaxies to understand how broadband afterglow luminosities are influenced by their environmental properties. We compare the X-ray and optical afterglow luminosities at 3 hr with projected physical and host-normalized galactocentric offsets, host stellar mass, star-formation rate (SFR), specific SFR, and stellar population age. In the radio band, we explore how these environmental properties may influence afterglow detectability. We find statistical support that X-ray afterglows are brighter in galaxies with younger ages, lower masses, and higher active star formation - trends that also scale with ISM density. While we also visualize these differences for optical afterglows, the only statistically significant trend is that they are brighter in hosts with higher SFR. We further find that X-ray (radio) afterglows are more luminous (more likely to be detected) at low projected offsets. Overall, this indicates that X-ray afterglow luminosity is the most predictable indicator of host environment among the three bands. We find the afterglow luminosities of three possible merger-driven long GRBs to be unremarkable compared to the traditional short GRB population, strengthening the case that these events arise from mergers. Finally we find that the estimated on-axis afterglow luminosity of GW170817 is in the faintest ~30%, aligning with its quiescent, old and massive host environment.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.20156 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A flowchart depicting the breakdown of our sample at each wavelength (X-ray: blue, optical: red, and radio: green). Within each wavelength, we display the number of GRBs that have either detected afterglows or upper limits. We further include the number of GRBs that have host stellar populations, physical and host-normalized offsets, and spectroscopic versus photometric redshifts. We note that five GRBs have no griz… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Left: The detected X-ray afterglow luminosities compared to rest-frame time after the burst (δtRF for our short GRB sample (gray circles). The blue stars represent the luminosity determined at a common rest-frame time (Lc) of 3 hr, following the methods described in Section 3. Right: The detected optical afterglows (gray circles) and upper limits (gray triangles) for our short GRB sample. The red stars show the Lc d… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Left Column: CDFs of the X-ray afterglows of short GRBs at δtc = 3 hr with δRphys > 7 kpc or δRnorm > 1.66 re (light blue), and < 7 kpc or < 1.66 re (dark blue). The median in each distribution is represented by a color-coded arrow denoted from the legend. Middle Column: CDFs of the optical afterglows of short GRBs at δtc = 3 hr with δRphys > 7 kpc or δRnorm > 1.66 re (light red) and < 7 kpc or < 1.66 re (dark red).… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The fraction of pAD or pLR values that are < 0.05 when assessing whether distributions of “high” and “low” (e.g., high-offset and low-offset) environmental prop￾erties are drawn from the same underlying distribution. We show the fraction for the X-ray (blue circles), o…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Median X-ray (left) and optical (right) afterglow luminosities in which the length of each bar represents the 68% confidence interval for each population, representing the values in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    -[ ot B: d1z|: w^N;-.(//h0.Ҙ> z׿]&(N:x _ݻghѢ8Cn2BZn ͚5zomM w # < =zĔ)S M6 #8

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    P., Abbott , R., Abbott , T

    Abbott , B. P., Abbott , R., Abbott , T. D., et al. 2017, , 848, L13, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa920c

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa920c 2017

  5. [5]

    2020, , 643, A113, 10.1051/0004-6361/202037669

    Ackley , K., Amati , L., Barbieri , C., et al. 2020, , 643, A113, 10.1051/0004-6361/202037669

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037669 2020

  6. [6]

    u \' Fern \'a ndez , J. F., Th \

    Ag \"u \' Fern \'a ndez , J. F., Th \"o ne , C. C., Kann , D. A., et al. 2023, , 520, 613, 10.1093/mnras/stad099

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad099 2023

  7. [7]

    P., Anand , S., et al

    Ahumada , T., Singer , L. P., Anand , S., et al. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 917, 10.1038/s41550-021-01428-7

    doi:10.1038/s41550-021-01428-7 2021

  8. [8]

    W., et al

    Ahumada , T., Anand , S., Coughlin , M. W., et al. 2024, , 136, 114201, 10.1088/1538-3873/ad8265

    doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ad8265 2024

Show all 300 references
  1. [9]

    2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1902.05569, 10.48550/arXiv.1902.05569

    Akeson , R., Armus , L., Bachelet , E., et al. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1902.05569, 10.48550/arXiv.1902.05569

    2019 doi arXiv

  2. [10]

    D., Schroeder , G., Paterson , K., et al

    Alexander , K. D., Schroeder , G., Paterson , K., et al. 2021, , 923, 66, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac281a

    2021 doi

  3. [11]

    2018, , 481, 4332, 10.1093/mnras/sty2530

    Anand , N., Shahid , M., & Resmi , L. 2018, , 481, 4332, 10.1093/mnras/sty2530

    2018 doi

  4. [12]

    W., Kasliwal , M

    Anand , S., Coughlin , M. W., Kasliwal , M. M., et al. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 46, 10.1038/s41550-020-1183-3

    2021 doi

  5. [13]

    E., Bell , M

    Anderson , G. E., Bell , M. E., Stevens , J., et al. 2018, GRB Coordinates Network, 23467, 1

    2018

  6. [14]

    2020, GRB Coordinates Network, 27573, 1

    ---. 2020, GRB Coordinates Network, 27573, 1

    2020

  7. [15]

    E., Bell , M

    Anderson , G. E., Bell , M. E., Hancock , P. J., et al. 2022, GRB Coordinates Network, 32529, 1

    2022

  8. [16]

    E., Stevens , J., Bell , M

    Anderson , G. E., Stevens , J., Bell , M. E., et al. 2023, GRB Coordinates Network, 33433, 1

    2023

  9. [17]

    A., Anand , S., et al

    Andreoni , I., Goldstein , D. A., Anand , S., et al. 2019, , 881, L16, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab3399

    2019 doi

  10. [18]

    A., Kasliwal , M

    Andreoni , I., Goldstein , D. A., Kasliwal , M. M., et al. 2020, , 890, 131, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6a1b

    2020 doi

  11. [19]

    J., & Mandel , I

    Andrews , J. J., & Mandel , I. 2019, , 880, L8, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab2ed1

    2019 doi

  12. [20]

    2020 a , , 492, 3904, 10.1093/mnras/stz3142

    Antier , S., Agayeva , S., Aivazyan , V., et al. 2020 a , , 492, 3904, 10.1093/mnras/stz3142

    2020 doi

  13. [21]

    2020 b , , 497, 5518, 10.1093/mnras/staa1846

    Antier , S., Agayeva , S., Almualla , M., et al. 2020 b , , 497, 5518, 10.1093/mnras/staa1846

    2020 doi

  14. [22]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, , 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    2013 doi

  15. [23]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    2018 doi

  16. [24]

    M., Lim , P

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Lim , P. L., et al. 2022, , 935, 167, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    2022 doi

  17. [25]

    L., Dichiara , S., Watson , A

    Becerra , R. L., Dichiara , S., Watson , A. M., et al. 2021, , 507, 1401, 10.1093/mnras/stab2086

    2021 doi

  18. [26]

    2023, GRB Coordinates Network, 33383, 1

    Belkin , S., Klunko , E., Pozanenko , A., Pankov , N., & GRB IKI FuN . 2023, GRB Coordinates Network, 33383, 1

    2023

  19. [27]

    2021, GRB Coordinates Network, 31222, 1

    Belles , A., D'Ai , A., & Swift/UVOT Team . 2021, GRB Coordinates Network, 31222, 1

    2021

  20. [28]

    L., Larson , D., Weiland , J

    Bennett , C. L., Larson , D., Weiland , J. L., & Hinshaw , G. 2014, , 794, 135, 10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/135

    2014 doi

  21. [29]

    2007, , 670, 1254, 10.1086/522195

    Berger , E. 2007, , 670, 1254, 10.1086/522195

    2007 doi

  22. [30]

    2014, , 52, 43, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-035926

    ---. 2014, , 52, 43, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-035926

    2014 doi

  23. [31]

    B., Fox , D

    Berger , E., Cenko , S. B., Fox , D. B., & Cucchiara , A. 2009, , 704, 877, 10.1088/0004-637X/704/1/877

    2009 doi

  24. [32]

    2009 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 10182, 1

    Berger , E., & Fong , W. 2009 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 10182, 1

    2009

  25. [33]

    2013 a , , 774, L23, 10.1088/2041-8205/774/2/L23

    Berger , E., Fong , W., & Chornock , R. 2013 a , , 774, L23, 10.1088/2041-8205/774/2/L23

    2013 doi

  26. [34]

    Berger , E., & Fong , W. F. 2009 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 9373, 1

    2009

  27. [35]

    2009 c , GRB Coordinates Network, 9555, 1

    ---. 2009 c , GRB Coordinates Network, 9555, 1

    2009

  28. [36]

    2009 d , GRB Coordinates Network, 9683, 1

    ---. 2009 d , GRB Coordinates Network, 9683, 1

    2009

  29. [37]

    A., Cenko , S

    Berger , E., Price , P. A., Cenko , S. B., et al. 2005, , 438, 988, 10.1038/nature04238

    2005 doi

  30. [38]

    B., Price , P

    Berger , E., Fox , D. B., Price , P. A., et al. 2007, , 664, 1000, 10.1086/518762

    2007 doi

  31. [39]

    A., Levan , A., et al

    Berger , E., Zauderer , B. A., Levan , A., et al. 2013 b , , 765, 121, 10.1088/0004-637X/765/2/121

    2013 doi

  32. [40]

    P., Corsi , A., et al

    Bhakta , D., Mooley , K. P., Corsi , A., et al. 2021, , 911, 77, 10.3847/1538-4357/abeaa8

    2021 doi

  33. [41]

    2012, , 756, 183, 10.1088/0004-637X/756/2/183

    Bigiel , F., & Blitz , L. 2012, , 756, 183, 10.1088/0004-637X/756/2/183

    2012 doi

  34. [42]

    K., Berger , E., & Fong , W.-f

    Blanchard , P. K., Berger , E., & Fong , W.-f. 2016, , 817, 144, 10.3847/0004-637X/817/2/144

    2016 doi

  35. [43]

    K., Berger , E., Fong , W., et al

    Blanchard , P. K., Berger , E., Fong , W., et al. 2017, , 848, L22, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9055

    2017 doi

  36. [44]

    R., & Moustakas , J

    Blanton , M. R., & Moustakas , J. 2009, , 47, 159, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101734

    2009 doi

  37. [45]

    J., Mangano , V., Voges , W., Marshall , F., & Gehrels , N

    Blustin , A. J., Mangano , V., Voges , W., Marshall , F., & Gehrels , N. 2005 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 4331, 1

    2005

  38. [46]

    J., Retter , A., Page , M

    Blustin , A. J., Retter , A., Page , M. J., et al. 2005 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 3791, 1

    2005

  39. [47]

    2017, GRB Coordinates Network, 21050, 1

    Bolmer , J., Steinle , H., & Schady , P. 2017, GRB Coordinates Network, 21050, 1

    2017

  40. [48]

    A., Dichiara , S., & Swift/UVOT Team

    Breeveld , A. A., Dichiara , S., & Swift/UVOT Team . 2023, GRB Coordinates Network, 33392, 1

    2023

  41. [49]

    A., Gropp , J

    Breeveld , A. A., Gropp , J. D., & Swift/UVOT Team . 2021, GRB Coordinates Network, 29712, 1

    2021

  42. [50]

    A., & Krimm , H

    Breeveld , A. A., & Krimm , H. A. 2015, GRB Coordinates Network, 18092, 1

    2015

  43. [51]

    A., Page , K

    Breeveld , A. A., Page , K. L., & Swift/UVOT Team . 2020, GRB Coordinates Network, 29129, 1

    2020

  44. [52]

    A., & Siegel , M

    Breeveld , A. A., & Siegel , M. H. 2016, GRB Coordinates Network, 19839, 1

    2016

  45. [53]

    2021, , 909, 26, 10.3847/1538-4357/abd69b

    Brout , D., & Scolnic , D. 2021, , 909, 26, 10.3847/1538-4357/abd69b

    2021 doi

  46. [54]

    J., & Pagani , C

    Brown , P. J., & Pagani , C. 2008, GRB Coordinates Network, 8208, 1

    2008

  47. [55]

    J., & Racusin , J

    Brown , P. J., & Racusin , J. L. 2006, GRB Coordinates Network, 5385, 1

    2006

  48. [56]

    2023, GRB Coordinates Network, 33414, 1

    Burns , E., Goldstein , A., Lesage , S., Dalessi , S., & Fermi-GBM Team. 2023, GRB Coordinates Network, 33414, 1

    2023

  49. [57]

    M., Kutyrev , A., et al

    Butler , N., Watson , A. M., Kutyrev , A., et al. 2015, GRB Coordinates Network, 17762, 1

    2015

  50. [58]

    2016, GRB Coordinates Network, 19131, 1

    ---. 2016, GRB Coordinates Network, 19131, 1

    2016

  51. [59]

    2018, GRB Coordinates Network, 22582, 1

    ---. 2018, GRB Coordinates Network, 22582, 1

    2018

  52. [60]

    2019, GRB Coordinates Network, 26121, 1

    ---. 2019, GRB Coordinates Network, 26121, 1

    2019

  53. [61]

    B., & Frail , D

    Cameron , P. B., & Frail , D. A. 2005 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 3815, 1

    2005

  54. [62]

    2005 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 3933, 1

    ---. 2005 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 3933, 1

    2005

  55. [63]

    E., Malesani , D., & Tronsgaard , R

    Cano , Z., Heintz , K. E., Malesani , D., & Tronsgaard , R. 2017, GRB Coordinates Network, 20549, 1

    2017

  56. [64]

    A., Tohuvavohu , A., et al

    Capalbi , M., Kennea , J. A., Tohuvavohu , A., et al. 2023, GRB Coordinates Network, 33365, 1

    2023

  57. [65]

    A., Clayton , G

    Cardelli , J. A., Clayton , G. C., & Mathis , J. S. 1989, , 345, 245, 10.1086/167900

    1989 doi

  58. [66]

    P., Bianchi , S., et al

    Casasola , V., Cassar \`a , L. P., Bianchi , S., et al. 2017, , 605, A18, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731020

    2017 doi

  59. [67]

    2023, GRB Coordinates Network, 33412, 1

    Casentini , C., Tavani , M., Pittori , C., et al. 2023, GRB Coordinates Network, 33412, 1

    2023

  60. [68]

    J., Bond , I., Kilmartin , P., et al

    Castro-Tirado , A. J., Bond , I., Kilmartin , P., et al. 2005, GRB Coordinates Network, 3018, 1

    2005

  61. [69]

    B., Fox , D

    Cenko , S. B., Fox , D. B., & Price , P. A. 2006, GRB Coordinates Network, 5912, 1

    2006

  62. [70]

    B., Frail , D

    Chandra , P., Cenko , S. B., Frail , D. A., & Harrison , F. 2008, GRB Coordinates Network, 8451, 1

    2008

  63. [71]

    Chandra , P., & Frail , D. A. 2006, GRB Coordinates Network, 5910, 1

    2006

  64. [72]

    2007 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 6367, 1

    ---. 2007 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 6367, 1

    2007

  65. [73]

    2007 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 6685, 1

    ---. 2007 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 6685, 1

    2007

  66. [74]

    2007 c , GRB Coordinates Network, 6667, 1

    ---. 2007 c , GRB Coordinates Network, 6667, 1

    2007

  67. [75]

    2007 d , GRB Coordinates Network, 6742, 1

    ---. 2007 d , GRB Coordinates Network, 6742, 1

    2007

  68. [76]

    2007 e , GRB Coordinates Network, 6831, 1

    ---. 2007 e , GRB Coordinates Network, 6831, 1

    2007

  69. [77]

    2008 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 7934, 1

    ---. 2008 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 7934, 1

    2008

  70. [78]

    2008 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 8419, 1

    ---. 2008 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 8419, 1

    2008

  71. [79]

    2009, GRB Coordinates Network, 9160, 1

    ---. 2009, GRB Coordinates Network, 9160, 1

    2009

  72. [80]

    Chandra , P., & Nayana , A. J. 2017, GRB Coordinates Network, 21441, 1

    2017

  73. [81]

    A., Wolf , C., et al

    Chang , S.-W., Onken , C. A., Wolf , C., et al. 2021, , 38, e024, 10.1017/pasa.2021.17

    2021 doi

  74. [82]

    I., van der Horst , A

    Chastain , S. I., van der Horst , A. J., Anderson , G. E., et al. 2024, , 532, 2820, 10.1093/mnras/stae1568

    2024 doi

  75. [83]

    W., Klose , S., Guelbenzu , A

    Chen , T. W., Klose , S., Guelbenzu , A. N., et al. 2016, GRB Coordinates Network, 19975, 1

    2016

  76. [84]

    M., & D'Elia , V

    Chester , M. M., & D'Elia , V. 2015, GRB Coordinates Network, 17323, 1

    2015

  77. [85]

    2013, , 770, 108, 10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/108

    Childress , M., Aldering , G., Antilogus , P., et al. 2013, , 770, 108, 10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/108

    2013 doi

  78. [86]

    2018, GRB Coordinates Network, 22668, 1

    Choi , C., Kim , Y., Park , W., Shin , S., & Im , M. 2018, GRB Coordinates Network, 22668, 1

    2018

  79. [87]

    2015, GRB Coordinates Network, 17358, 1

    Chornock , R., & Fong , W. 2015, GRB Coordinates Network, 17358, 1

    2015

  80. [88]

    A., Gompertz, B

    Chrimes, A. A., Gompertz, B. P., Kann, D. A., et al. 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 515, 2591–2611, 10.1093/mnras/stac1796

    2022 doi

  81. [89]

    P., Levan , A

    Church , R. P., Levan , A. J., Davies , M. B., & Tanvir , N. 2011, , 413, 2004, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18277.x

    2011

  82. [90]

    W., Ahumada , T., Anand , S., et al

    Coughlin , M. W., Ahumada , T., Anand , S., et al. 2019, , 885, L19, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab4ad8

    2019 doi

  83. [91]

    A., Kilpatrick , C

    Coulter , D. A., Kilpatrick , C. D., Jones , D. O., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.15441, 10.48550/arXiv.2404.15441

    2024 doi arXiv

  84. [92]

    2017, GRB Coordinates Network, 21382, 1

    Cucchiara , A., Morris , D., & Guidorzi , C. 2017, GRB Coordinates Network, 21382, 1

    2017

  85. [93]

    Cucchiara , A., & Ukwatta , T. N. 2008, GRB Coordinates Network, 7207, 1

    2008

  86. [94]

    2024, , 962, L37, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad2680

    Dai , C.-Y., Guo , C.-L., Zhang , H.-M., Liu , R.-Y., & Wang , X.-Y. 2024, , 962, L37, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad2680

    2024 doi

  87. [95]

    B., Gupta , R

    D'Andrea , C. B., Gupta , R. R., Sako , M., et al. 2011, , 743, 172, 10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/172

    2011 doi

  88. [96]

    E., Anderson , G

    d'Antonio , D., Bell , M. E., Anderson , G. E., et al. 2020, GRB Coordinates Network, 27245, 1

    2020

  89. [97]

    2017, GRB Coordinates Network, 21055, 1

    D'Avanzo , P., D'Elia , V., Malesani , D., et al. 2017, GRB Coordinates Network, 21055, 1

    2017

  90. [98]

    2022, GRB Coordinates Network, 31904, 1

    D'Avanzo , P., Piranomonte , S., Di Fabrizio , L., Stoev , H., & CIBO Collaboration . 2022, GRB Coordinates Network, 31904, 1

    2022

  91. [99]

    2009, , 498, 711, 10.1051/0004-6361/200811294

    D'Avanzo , P., Malesani , D., Covino , S., et al. 2009, , 498, 711, 10.1051/0004-6361/200811294

    2009 doi

  92. [100]

    2012, , 425, 506, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21489.x

    D'Avanzo , P., Salvaterra , R., Sbarufatti , B., et al. 2012, , 425, 506, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21489.x

    2012

  93. [101]

    2023, GRB Coordinates Network, 33374, 1

    D'Avanzo , P., Rossi , A., Brivio , R., et al. 2023, GRB Coordinates Network, 33374, 1

    2023

  94. [102]

    2019, Journal of Open Source Software, 4, 1317, 10.21105/joss.01317

    Davidson-Pilon, C. 2019, Journal of Open Source Software, 4, 1317, 10.21105/joss.01317

    2019 doi

  95. [103]

    J., Kochanek , C

    de Jaeger , T., Shappee , B. J., Kochanek , C. S., et al. 2022, , 509, 3427, 10.1093/mnras/stab3141

    2022 doi

  96. [104]

    2008, GRB Coordinates Network, 7932, 1

    de Pasquale , M. 2008, GRB Coordinates Network, 7932, 1

    2008

  97. [105]

    2016, GRB Coordinates Network, 19576, 1

    de Pasquale , M., & D'Ai , A. 2016, GRB Coordinates Network, 19576, 1

    2016

  98. [106]

    2015, GRB Coordinates Network, 18753, 1

    de Pasquale , M., & Kocevski , D. 2015, GRB Coordinates Network, 18753, 1

    2015

  99. [107]

    P., & Krimm , H

    de Pasquale , M., Kuin , N. P., & Krimm , H. A. 2016, GRB Coordinates Network, 19465, 1

    2016

  100. [108]

    2008, GRB Coordinates Network, 8406, 1

    de Pasquale , M., & Stratta , G. 2008, GRB Coordinates Network, 8406, 1

    2008

  101. [109]

    A., Malesani , D

    de Ugarte Postigo , A., Kann , D. A., Malesani , D. B., et al. 2021 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 29717, 1

    2021

  102. [110]

    A., Thoene , C., et al

    de Ugarte Postigo , A., Kann , D. A., Thoene , C., et al. 2021 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 31218, 1

    2021

  103. [111]

    M., Levan , A

    de Wet , S., Vreeswijk , P. M., Levan , A. J., et al. 2021 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 31063, 1

    2021

  104. [112]

    J., Bloemen , S., et al

    de Wet , S., Groot , P. J., Bloemen , S., et al. 2021 b , , 649, A72, 10.1051/0004-6361/202040231

    2021 doi

  105. [113]

    P., Barat , C., Talon , R., et al

    Dezalay , J. P., Barat , C., Talon , R., et al. 1992, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 265, American Institute of Physics Conference Series, ed. W. S. Paciesas & G. J. Fishman (AIP), 304

    1992

  106. [114]

    B., Troja , E., et al

    Dichiara , S., Cenko , S. B., Troja , E., et al. 2020 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 28572, 1

    2020

  107. [115]

    2020 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 27822, 1

    Dichiara , S., O'Connor , B., & Troja , E. 2020 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 27822, 1

    2020

  108. [116]

    2019, GRB Coordinates Network, 26147, 1

    Dichiara , S., & Troja , E. 2019, GRB Coordinates Network, 26147, 1

    2019

  109. [117]

    B., et al

    Dichiara , S., Troja , E., Cenko , S. B., et al. 2020 c , GRB Coordinates Network, 29128, 1

    2020

  110. [118]

    L., Chase , E

    Dichiara , S., Becerra , R. L., Chase , E. A., et al. 2021, , 923, L32, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac4259

    2021 doi

  111. [119]

    2020, GRB Coordinates Network, 29148, 1

    Dimple , Panchal , A., Gangopadhyay , A., et al. 2020, GRB Coordinates Network, 29148, 1

    2020

  112. [120]

    2019, , 887, L13, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab59db

    Dobie , D., Stewart , A., Murphy , T., et al. 2019, , 887, L13, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab59db

    2019 doi

  113. [121]

    2022, , 510, 3794, 10.1093/mnras/stab3628

    Dobie , D., Stewart , A., Hotokezaka , K., et al. 2022, , 510, 3794, 10.1093/mnras/stab3628

    2022 doi

  114. [122]

    2016, GRB Coordinates Network, 19127, 1

    Elenin , L., Mazaeva , E., Volnova , A., Molotov , I., & Pozanenko , A. 2016, GRB Coordinates Network, 19127, 1

    2016

  115. [123]

    Emery , S. W. K., & Beardmore , A. P. 2016, GRB Coordinates Network, 19134, 1

    2016

  116. [124]

    Emery , S. W. K., & Lien , A. Y. 2018, GRB Coordinates Network, 22587, 1

    2018

  117. [125]

    A., & Swift-XRT Team

    Evans , P. A., & Swift-XRT Team . 2023, GRB Coordinates Network, 33379, 1

    2023

  118. [126]

    A., Beardmore , A

    Evans , P. A., Beardmore , A. P., Page , K. L., et al. 2007, , 469, 379, 10.1051/0004-6361:20077530

    2007 doi

  119. [127]

    2009, , 397, 1177, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14913.x

    ---. 2009, , 397, 1177, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14913.x

    2009

  120. [128]

    2016, GRB Coordinates Network, 19147, 1

    Fong , W. 2016, GRB Coordinates Network, 19147, 1

    2016

  121. [129]

    2013, , 776, 18, 10.1088/0004-637X/776/1/18

    Fong , W., & Berger , E. 2013, , 776, 18, 10.1088/0004-637X/776/1/18

    2013 doi

  122. [130]

    Fong , W., Berger , E., Margutti , R., & Zauderer , B. A. 2015, , 815, 102, 10.1088/0004-637X/815/2/102

    2015 doi

  123. [131]

    D., & Berger , E

    Fong , W., Laskar , T., Alexander , K. D., & Berger , E. 2017, GRB Coordinates Network, 21395, 1

    2017

  124. [132]

    R., & Levan , A

    Fong , W., Tanvir , N. R., & Levan , A. J. 2018 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 23439, 1

    2018

  125. [133]

    R., Levan , A

    Fong , W., Tanvir , N. R., Levan , A. J., & Chornock , R. 2018 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 22659, 1

    2018

  126. [134]

    2012, , 756, 189, 10.1088/0004-637X/756/2/189

    Fong , W., Berger , E., Margutti , R., et al. 2012, , 756, 189, 10.1088/0004-637X/756/2/189

    2012 doi

  127. [135]

    D., et al

    Fong , W., Berger , E., Metzger , B. D., et al. 2014, , 780, 118, 10.1088/0004-637X/780/2/118

    2014 doi

  128. [136]

    2016, , 833, 151, 10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/151

    Fong , W., Margutti , R., Chornock , R., et al. 2016, , 833, 151, 10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/151

    2016 doi

  129. [137]

    2021, , 906, 127, 10.3847/1538-4357/abc74a

    Fong , W., Laskar , T., Rastinejad , J., et al. 2021, , 906, 127, 10.3847/1538-4357/abc74a

    2021 doi

  130. [138]

    E., Dong , Y., et al

    Fong , W.-f., Nugent , A. E., Dong , Y., et al. 2022, , 940, 56, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac91d0

    2022 doi

  131. [139]

    B., & Cenko , S

    Fox , D. B., & Cenko , S. B. 2005, GRB Coordinates Network, 3787, 1

    2005

  132. [140]

    B., Frail , D

    Fox , D. B., Frail , D. A., Price , P. A., et al. 2005, , 437, 845, 10.1038/nature04189

    2005 doi

  133. [141]

    Frail , D. A. 2005, GRB Coordinates Network, 4276, 1

    2005

  134. [142]

    A., & Cameron , P

    Frail , D. A., & Cameron , P. B. 2005, GRB Coordinates Network, 4199, 1

    2005

  135. [143]

    A., & Chandra , P

    Frail , D. A., & Chandra , P. 2008, GRB Coordinates Network, 7684, 1

    2008

  136. [144]

    2009, GRB Coordinates Network, 9354, 1

    ---. 2009, GRB Coordinates Network, 9354, 1

    2009

  137. [145]

    A., & Soderberg , A

    Frail , D. A., & Soderberg , A. M. 2005, GRB Coordinates Network, 3007, 1

    2005

  138. [146]

    A., Kulkarni , S

    Frail , D. A., Kulkarni , S. R., Sari , R., et al. 2001, , 562, L55, 10.1086/338119

    2001 doi

  139. [147]

    S., Levan , A

    Fruchter , A. S., Levan , A. J., Strolger , L., et al. 2006, , 441, 463, 10.1038/nature04787

    2006 doi

  140. [148]

    Y., Zhu , Z

    Fu , S. Y., Zhu , Z. P., Liu , X., et al. 2021, GRB Coordinates Network, 29700, 1

    2021

  141. [149]

    U., Jensen , B

    Fynbo , J. U., Jensen , B. L., Gorosabel , J., et al. 2001, , 369, 373, 10.1051/0004-6361:20010112

    2001 doi

  142. [150]

    2020, , 903, 75, 10.3847/1538-4357/abb823

    Garcia , A., Morgan , R., Herner , K., et al. 2020, , 903, 75, 10.3847/1538-4357/abb823

    2020 doi

  143. [151]

    J., Chrimes , A

    Gaspari , N., Levan , A. J., Chrimes , A. A., & Nelemans , G. 2024, , 527, 1101, 10.1093/mnras/stad3259

    2024 doi

  144. [152]

    2004, , 611, 1005, 10.1086/422091

    Gehrels , N., Chincarini , G., Giommi , P., et al. 2004, , 611, 1005, 10.1086/422091

    2004 doi

  145. [153]

    D., Burrows , D

    Gehrels , N., Barthelmy , S. D., Burrows , D. N., et al. 2008, , 689, 1161, 10.1086/592766

    2008 doi

  146. [154]

    S., Paragi , Z., et al

    Ghirlanda , G., Salafia , O. S., Paragi , Z., et al. 2019, Science, 363, 968, 10.1126/science.aau8815

    2019 doi

  147. [155]

    H., Troja , E., Fryer , C

    Gillanders , J. H., Troja , E., Fryer , C. L., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2308.00633, 10.48550/arXiv.2308.00633

    2023 doi arXiv

  148. [156]

    2017, , 848, L14, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa8f41

    Goldstein , A., Veres , P., Burns , E., et al. 2017, , 848, L14, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa8f41

    2017 doi

  149. [157]

    A., Andreoni , I., Nugent , P

    Goldstein , D. A., Andreoni , I., Nugent , P. E., et al. 2019, , 881, L7, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab3046

    2019 doi

  150. [158]

    S., et al

    Gomez , S., Hosseinzadeh , G., Cowperthwaite , P. S., et al. 2019, , 884, L55, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab4ad5

    2019 doi

  151. [159]

    P., Nicholl , M., Tanvir , N., et al

    Gompertz , B. P., Nicholl , M., Tanvir , N., et al. 2022, GRB Coordinates Network, 32966, 1

    2022

  152. [160]

    P., Levan , A

    Gompertz , B. P., Levan , A. J., Tanvir , N. R., et al. 2018, , 860, 62, 10.3847/1538-4357/aac206

    2018 doi

  153. [161]

    P., Cutter , R., Steeghs , D., et al

    Gompertz , B. P., Cutter , R., Steeghs , D., et al. 2020, , 497, 726, 10.1093/mnras/staa1845

    2020 doi

  154. [162]

    2016, GRB Coordinates Network, 19144, 1

    Graham , J., Bolmer , J., Wiseman , P., & Greiner , J. 2016, GRB Coordinates Network, 19144, 1

    2016

  155. [163]

    F., Fruchter , A

    Graham , J. F., Fruchter , A. S., Levan , A. J., et al. 2009, , 698, 1620, 10.1088/0004-637X/698/2/1620

    2009 doi

  156. [164]

    2002, , 568, 820, 10.1086/338966

    Granot , J., & Sari , R. 2002, , 568, 820, 10.1086/338966

    2002 doi

  157. [165]

    D., D'Elia , V., & Swift/UVOT Team

    Gropp , J. D., D'Elia , V., & Swift/UVOT Team . 2019, GRB Coordinates Network, 26128, 1

    2019

  158. [166]

    2021, GRB Coordinates Network, 31016, 1

    Grossan , B., Komesh , T., Maksut , Z., et al. 2021, GRB Coordinates Network, 31016, 1

    2021

  159. [167]

    G., Gomboc , A., & Steele , I

    Guidorzi , C., Kobayashi , S., Mundell , C. G., Gomboc , A., & Steele , I. A. 2018 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 22792, 1

    2018

  160. [168]

    2018 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 22648, 1

    Guidorzi , C., Martone , R., Kobayashi , S., et al. 2018 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 22648, 1

    2018

  161. [169]

    R., D'Andrea , C

    Gupta , R. R., D'Andrea , C. B., Sako , M., et al. 2011, , 740, 92, 10.1088/0004-637X/740/2/92

    2011 doi

  162. [170]

    2012 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 13338, 1

    Hancock , P., Murphy , T., Gaensler , B., et al. 2012 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 13338, 1

    2012

  163. [171]

    2012 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 13611, 1

    ---. 2012 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 13611, 1

    2012

  164. [172]

    2013, , 558, A22, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321471

    Hao , J.-M., & Yuan , Y.-F. 2013, , 558, A22, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321471

    2013 doi

  165. [173]

    2015, GRB Coordinates Network, 17763, 1

    Harita , S., Fujiwara , T., Yoshii , T., et al. 2015, GRB Coordinates Network, 17763, 1

    2015

  166. [174]

    E., Tanvir , N

    Heintz , K. E., Tanvir , N. R., Perley , D. A., & Rasmussen , R. T. 2017, GRB Coordinates Network, 21374, 1

    2017

  167. [175]

    Higgins , A., Wiersema , K., & Malesani , D. B. 2018, GRB Coordinates Network, 23090, 1

    2018

  168. [176]

    2013, , 208, 19, 10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19

    Hinshaw , G., Larson , D., Komatsu , E., et al. 2013, , 208, 19, 10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19

    2013 doi

  169. [177]

    T., & Marshall , F

    Holland , S. T., & Marshall , F. E. 2006, GRB Coordinates Network, 5898, 1

    2006

  170. [178]

    2018, GRB Coordinates Network, 22670, 1

    Horiuchi , T., Hanayama , H., Honma , M., et al. 2018, GRB Coordinates Network, 22670, 1

    2018

  171. [179]

    L., et al

    Hosokawa , R., Imai , Y., Murata , K. L., et al. 2021, GRB Coordinates Network, 31031, 1

    2021

  172. [180]

    S., Gomez , S., et al

    Hosseinzadeh , G., Cowperthwaite , P. S., Gomez , S., et al. 2019, , 880, L4, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab271c

    2019 doi

  173. [181]

    2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 940, 10.1038/s41550-019-0820-1

    Hotokezaka , K., Nakar , E., Gottlieb , O., et al. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 940, 10.1038/s41550-019-0820-1

    2019 doi

  174. [182]

    A., & Godet , O

    Hoversten , E. A., & Godet , O. 2008, GRB Coordinates Network, 8737, 1

    2008

  175. [183]

    D., Casanova , V., Fernandez-Garcia , E., et al

    Hu , Y. D., Casanova , V., Fernandez-Garcia , E., et al. 2023, GRB Coordinates Network, 33387, 1

    2023

  176. [184]

    D., Fernandez-Garcia , E., Castro-Tirado , A

    Hu , Y. D., Fernandez-Garcia , E., Castro-Tirado , A. J., et al. 2020, GRB Coordinates Network, 27784, 1

    2020

  177. [185]

    D., Casanova , V., Sun , T

    Hu , Y. D., Casanova , V., Sun , T. R., et al. 2021, GRB Coordinates Network, 30976, 1

    2021

  178. [186]

    Immler , S., & Holland , S. T. 2008, GRB Coordinates Network, 8277, 1

    2008

  179. [187]

    L., et al

    Ito , N., Hosokawa , R., Murata , K. L., et al. 2020, GRB Coordinates Network, 28571, 1

    2020

  180. [188]

    2021, GRB Coordinates Network, 31217, 1

    ---. 2021, GRB Coordinates Network, 31217, 1

    2021

  181. [189]

    2024, , 974, 114, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6b2a

    Jeong , M., & Im , M. 2024, , 974, 114, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6b2a

    2024 doi

  182. [190]

    2016 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 19140, 1

    Jeong , S., Im , M., Choi , C., & Lim , G. 2016 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 19140, 1

    2016

  183. [191]

    2010, Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 56, 1619, 10.3938/jkps.56.1619

    Jeong , S., & Lee , C.-H. 2010, Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 56, 1619, 10.3938/jkps.56.1619

    2010 doi

  184. [192]

    H., Hu , Y., Scarpa , R., & Castro-Tirado , A

    Jeong , S., Park , I. H., Hu , Y., Scarpa , R., & Castro-Tirado , A. J. 2016 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 19847, 1

    2016

  185. [193]

    Q., Zhu , Z

    Jiang , S. Q., Zhu , Z. P., Fu , S. Y., et al. 2021, GRB Coordinates Network, 31213, 1

    2021

  186. [194]

    2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 77, 10.1038/s41550-019-0892-y

    Jin , Z.-P., Covino , S., Liao , N.-H., et al. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 77, 10.1038/s41550-019-0892-y

    2020 doi

  187. [195]

    2015, , 811, L22, 10.1088/2041-8205/811/2/L22

    Jin , Z.-P., Li , X., Cano , Z., et al. 2015, , 811, L22, 10.1088/2041-8205/811/2/L22

    2015 doi

  188. [196]

    2016, Nature Communications, 7, 12898, 10.1038/ncomms12898

    Jin , Z.-P., Hotokezaka , K., Li , X., et al. 2016, Nature Communications, 7, 12898, 10.1038/ncomms12898

    2016 doi

  189. [197]

    2007, GRB Coordinates Network, 6218, 1

    Johnson , S., Reichart , D., Haislip , J., et al. 2007, GRB Coordinates Network, 6218, 1

    2007

  190. [198]

    A., de Ugarte Postigo , A., Thoene , C

    Kann , D. A., de Ugarte Postigo , A., Thoene , C. C., et al. 2021, GRB Coordinates Network, 30992, 1

    2021

  191. [199]

    A., Tanga , M., & Greiner , J

    Kann , D. A., Tanga , M., & Greiner , J. 2015, GRB Coordinates Network, 17757, 1

    2015

  192. [200]

    A., Klose , S., Zhang , B., et al

    Kann , D. A., Klose , S., Zhang , B., et al. 2010, , 720, 1513, 10.1088/0004-637X/720/2/1513

    2010 doi

  193. [201]

    2011, , 734, 96, 10.1088/0004-637X/734/2/96

    ---. 2011, , 734, 96, 10.1088/0004-637X/734/2/96

    2011 doi

  194. [202]

    M., Korobkin , O., Lau , R

    Kasliwal , M. M., Korobkin , O., Lau , R. M., Wollaeger , R., & Fryer , C. L. 2017, , 843, L34, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa799d

    2017 doi

  195. [203]

    M., Anand , S., Ahumada , T., et al

    Kasliwal , M. M., Anand , S., Ahumada , T., et al. 2020, , 905, 145, 10.3847/1538-4357/abc335

    2020 doi

  196. [204]

    L., Hicken , M., Burke , D

    Kelly , P. L., Hicken , M., Burke , D. L., Mandel , K. S., & Kirshner , R. P. 2010, , 715, 743, 10.1088/0004-637X/715/2/743

    2010 doi

  197. [205]

    D., Coulter , D

    Kilpatrick , C. D., Coulter , D. A., Arcavi , I., et al. 2021, , 923, 258, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac23c6

    2021 doi

  198. [206]

    D., Fong , W.-f., Blanchard , P

    Kilpatrick , C. D., Fong , W.-f., Blanchard , P. K., et al. 2022, , 926, 49, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3e59

    2022 doi

  199. [207]

    2021, GRB Coordinates Network, 30856, 1

    Kim , S., Im , M., Cooke , J., et al. 2021, GRB Coordinates Network, 30856, 1

    2021

  200. [208]

    2009, GRB Coordinates Network, 9292, 1

    Kinugasa , K., Honda , S., Hashimoto , O., Takahashi , H., & Taguchi , H. 2009, GRB Coordinates Network, 9292, 1

    2009

  201. [209]

    2016, GRB Coordinates Network, 19142, 1

    Klose , S., Nicuesa Guelbenzu , A., Kruehler , T., Malesani , D., & Greiner , J. 2016, GRB Coordinates Network, 19142, 1

    2016

  202. [210]

    2015, GRB Coordinates Network, 18219, 1

    Knust , F., Klose , S., & Greiner , J. 2015, GRB Coordinates Network, 18219, 1

    2015

  203. [211]

    2023, GRB Coordinates Network, 33436, 1

    Komesh , T., Maksut , Z., Grossan , B., et al. 2023, GRB Coordinates Network, 33436, 1

    2023

  204. [212]

    A., Fishman , G

    Kouveliotou , C., Meegan , C. A., Fishman , G. J., et al. 1993, , 413, L101, 10.1086/186969

    1993 doi

  205. [213]

    2011, , 534, A108, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117428

    Kr \"u hler , T., Greiner , J., Schady , P., et al. 2011, , 534, A108, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117428

    2011 doi

  206. [214]

    Kuin , N. P. M., & Beardmore , A. P. 2017, GRB Coordinates Network, 21049, 1

    2017

  207. [215]

    Kuin , N. P. M., & D'Avanzo , P. 2018, GRB Coordinates Network, 23080, 1

    2018

  208. [216]

    Kuin , N. P. M., Dichiara , S., & Swift/UVOT Team . 2021, GRB Coordinates Network, 30975, 1

    2021

  209. [217]

    2022 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 32435, 1

    ---. 2022 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 32435, 1

    2022

  210. [218]

    Kuin , N. P. M., Evans , P. A., & Swift/UVOT Team . 2020 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 27783, 1

    2020

  211. [219]

    Kuin , N. P. M., & Hoversten , E. A. 2009, GRB Coordinates Network, 9342, 1

    2009

  212. [220]

    Kuin , N. P. M., & Page , K. L. 2016, GRB Coordinates Network, 19970, 1

    2016

  213. [221]

    Kuin , N. P. M., Tohuvavohu , A., & Swift/UVOT Team . 2020 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 27539, 1

    2020

  214. [222]

    2022 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 32958, 1

    Kuin , P., Eyles-Ferris , R., & Swift/UVOT Team . 2022 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 32958, 1

    2022

  215. [223]

    Kuin , P., & Gibson , S. L. 2016, GRB Coordinates Network, 19963, 1

    2016

  216. [224]

    2022, GRB Coordinates Network, 31892, 1

    Kumar , H., Swain , V., Norbu , R., et al. 2022, GRB Coordinates Network, 31892, 1

    2022

  217. [225]

    2021, GRB Coordinates Network, 31227, 1

    Kumar , H., Bhalerao , V., Gupta , R., et al. 2021, GRB Coordinates Network, 31227, 1

    2021

  218. [226]

    2008, GRB Coordinates Network, 7676, 1

    Kuroda , D., Yanagisawa , K., & Kawai , N. 2008, GRB Coordinates Network, 7676, 1

    2008

  219. [227]

    2015 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 17742, 1

    Kuroda , D., Yanagisawa , K., Shimizu , Y., et al. 2015 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 17742, 1

    2015

  220. [228]

    2015 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 18761, 1

    ---. 2015 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 18761, 1

    2015

  221. [229]

    2016 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 19128, 1

    ---. 2016 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 19128, 1

    2016

  222. [230]

    2016 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 19480, 1

    ---. 2016 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 19480, 1

    2016

  223. [231]

    2016 c , GRB Coordinates Network, 19571, 1

    Kuroda , D., Hanayama , H., Miyaji , T., et al. 2016 c , GRB Coordinates Network, 19571, 1

    2016

  224. [232]

    P., Lyman , J

    Lamb , G. P., Lyman , J. D., Levan , A. J., et al. 2019 a , , 870, L15, 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf96b

    2019 doi

  225. [233]

    P., Tanvir , N

    Lamb , G. P., Tanvir , N. R., Levan , A. J., et al. 2019 b , , 883, 48, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab38bb

    2019 doi

  226. [234]

    C., et al

    Lampeitl , H., Smith , M., Nichol , R. C., et al. 2010, , 722, 566, 10.1088/0004-637X/722/1/566

    2010 doi

  227. [235]

    2017, GRB Coordinates Network, 21399, 1

    Laporte , S. 2017, GRB Coordinates Network, 21399, 1

    2017

  228. [236]

    J., & Cannizzo , J

    Laporte , S. J., & Cannizzo , J. K. 2017, GRB Coordinates Network, 21386, 1

    2017

  229. [237]

    J., & Cenko , S

    Laporte , S. J., & Cenko , S. B. 2017, GRB Coordinates Network, 21388, 1

    2017

  230. [238]

    D., et al

    Laskar , T., Fong , W., Alexander , K. D., et al. 2019, GRB Coordinates Network, 26120, 1

    2019

  231. [239]

    R., Schroeder , G., et al

    Laskar , T., Escorial , A. R., Schroeder , G., et al. 2022, , 935, L11, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac8421

    2022 doi

  232. [240]

    J., et al

    Lazzati , D., Perna , R., Morsony , B. J., et al. 2018, , 120, 241103, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.241103

    2018 doi

  233. [241]

    N., & Berger , E

    Leibler , C. N., & Berger , E. 2010, , 725, 1202, 10.1088/0004-637X/725/1/1202

    2010 doi

  234. [242]

    S., Ting , Y.-S., et al

    Leja , J., Speagle , J. S., Ting , Y.-S., et al. 2022, , 936, 165, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac887d

    2022 doi

  235. [243]

    J., Rastinejad , J., Gompertz , B., et al

    Levan , A. J., Rastinejad , J., Gompertz , B., et al. 2021, GRB Coordinates Network, 31235, 1

    2021

  236. [244]

    J., Tanvir , N

    Levan , A. J., Tanvir , N. R., Fruchter , A. S., et al. 2006, , 648, L9, 10.1086/507625

    2006 doi

  237. [245]

    J., Tanvir , N

    Levan , A. J., Tanvir , N. R., Jakobsson , P., et al. 2008, , 384, 541, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11953.x

    2008

  238. [246]

    J., Lyman , J

    Levan , A. J., Lyman , J. D., Tanvir , N. R., et al. 2017, , 848, L28, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa905f

    2017 doi

  239. [247]

    J., Gompertz , B

    Levan , A. J., Gompertz , B. P., Salafia , O. S., et al. 2024, , 626, 737, 10.1038/s41586-023-06759-1

    2024 doi

  240. [248]

    D., et al

    Lien , A., Sakamoto , T., Barthelmy , S. D., et al. 2016, , 829, 7, 10.3847/0004-637X/829/1/7

    2016 doi

  241. [249]

    2020 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 27542, 1

    Lipunov , V., Gorbovskoy , E., Kornilov , V., et al. 2020 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 27542, 1

    2020

  242. [250]

    2020 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 29122, 1

    ---. 2020 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 29122, 1

    2020

  243. [251]

    2020 c , GRB Coordinates Network, 27789, 1

    ---. 2020 c , GRB Coordinates Network, 27789, 1

    2020

  244. [252]

    2021, GRB Coordinates Network, 31216, 1

    Lipunov , V., Kornilov , V., Gorbovskoy , E., et al. 2021, GRB Coordinates Network, 31216, 1

    2021

  245. [253]

    M., et al

    Littlejohns , O., Butler , N., Watson , A. M., et al. 2015, GRB Coordinates Network, 17736, 1

    2015

  246. [254]

    A., Allison , J., et al

    LSST Science Collaboration , Abell , P. A., Allison , J., et al. 2009, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:0912.0201, 10.48550/arXiv.0912.0201

    2009 doi arXiv

  247. [255]

    H., Jiang , S

    Lu , T. H., Jiang , S. Q., Fu , S. Y., et al. 2023, GRB Coordinates Network, 33381, 1

    2023

  248. [256]

    J., Paterson , K., Fong , W., et al

    Lundquist , M. J., Paterson , K., Fong , W., et al. 2019, , 881, L26, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab32f2

    2019 doi

  249. [257]

    D., Levan , A

    Lyman , J. D., Levan , A. J., Tanvir , N. R., et al. 2017, , 467, 1795, 10.1093/mnras/stx220

    2017 doi

  250. [258]

    D., Lamb , G

    Lyman , J. D., Lamb , G. P., Levan , A. J., et al. 2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 751, 10.1038/s41550-018-0511-3

    2018 doi

  251. [259]

    I., & Woosley , S

    MacFadyen , A. I., & Woosley , S. E. 1999, , 524, 262, 10.1086/307790

    1999 doi

  252. [260]

    E., Stone , M., & Stone , J

    Malesani , D., Heintz , K. E., Stone , M., & Stone , J. 2018, GRB Coordinates Network, 22660, 1

    2018

  253. [261]

    C., et al

    Malesani , D., Uthas , H., Thoene , C. C., et al. 2007 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 6254, 1

    2007

  254. [262]

    2016, GRB Coordinates Network, 19300, 1

    Malesani , D., Xu , D., & Kuutma , T. 2016, GRB Coordinates Network, 19300, 1

    2016

  255. [263]

    2007 b , , 473, 77, 10.1051/0004-6361:20077868

    Malesani , D., Covino , S., D'Avanzo , P., et al. 2007 b , , 473, 77, 10.1051/0004-6361:20077868

    2007 doi

  256. [264]

    B., de Ugarte Postigo , A., Zhu , Z., et al

    Malesani , D. B., de Ugarte Postigo , A., Zhu , Z., et al. 2021 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 29703, 1

    2021

  257. [265]

    B., & Knudstrup , E

    Malesani , D. B., & Knudstrup , E. 2020, GRB Coordinates Network, 29117, 1

    2020

  258. [266]

    B., Fynbo , J

    Malesani , D. B., Fynbo , J. P. U., de Ugarte Postigo , A., et al. 2021 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 31221, 1

    2021

  259. [267]

    2021, , 59, 155, 10.1146/annurev-astro-112420-030742

    Margutti , R., & Chornock , R. 2021, , 59, 155, 10.1146/annurev-astro-112420-030742

    2021 doi

  260. [268]

    2012, , 756, 63, 10.1088/0004-637X/756/1/63

    Margutti , R., Berger , E., Fong , W., et al. 2012, , 756, 63, 10.1088/0004-637X/756/1/63

    2012 doi

  261. [269]

    G., et al

    Margutti , R., Zaninoni , E., Bernardini , M. G., et al. 2013, , 428, 729, 10.1093/mnras/sts066

    2013 doi

  262. [270]

    2017, , 848, L20, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9057

    Margutti , R., Berger , E., Fong , W., et al. 2017, , 848, L20, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9057

    2017 doi

  263. [271]

    E., & Beardmore , A

    Marshall , F. E., & Beardmore , A. 2018, GRB Coordinates Network, 23062, 1

    2018

  264. [272]

    E., & Beardmore , A

    Marshall , F. E., & Beardmore , A. P. 2015, GRB Coordinates Network, 17751, 1

    2015

  265. [273]

    E., & Cannizzo , J

    Marshall , F. E., & Cannizzo , J. K. 2017, GRB Coordinates Network, 20554, 1

    2017

  266. [274]

    E., & Gibson , S

    Marshall , F. E., & Gibson , S. L. 2016, GRB Coordinates Network, 19275, 1

    2016

  267. [275]

    E., Gropp , J

    Marshall , F. E., Gropp , J. D., & Swift/UVOT Team . 2020, GRB Coordinates Network, 28565, 1

    2020

  268. [276]

    E., & Pagani , C

    Marshall , F. E., & Pagani , C. 2015, GRB Coordinates Network, 17739, 1

    2015

  269. [277]

    2018, GRB Coordinates Network, 22809, 1

    Mazaeva , E., Kusakin , A., Pozanenko , A., et al. 2018, GRB Coordinates Network, 22809, 1

    2018

  270. [278]

    2015 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 18097, 1

    Mazaeva , E., Reva , I., Volnova , A., & Pozanenko , A. 2015 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 18097, 1

    2015

  271. [279]

    2015 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 17750, 1

    Mazaeva , E., Volnova , A., Kusakin , A., & Pozanenko , A. 2015 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 17750, 1

    2015

  272. [280]

    J., et al

    Melandri , A., Burgdorf , M., Smith , R. J., et al. 2008, GRB Coordinates Network, 8402, 1

    2008

  273. [281]

    2023, , 518, 1985, 10.1093/mnras/stac3056

    Meldorf , C., Palmese , A., Brout , D., et al. 2023, , 518, 1985, 10.1093/mnras/stac3056

    2023 doi

  274. [282]

    Meszaros , P., & Rees , M. J. 1993, , 405, 278, 10.1086/172360

    1993 doi

  275. [283]

    A., Tingay , S., & Macquart , J

    Moin , A., Frail , D. A., Tingay , S., & Macquart , J. P. 2009 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 10021, 1

    2009

  276. [284]

    2009 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 8952, 1

    Moin , A., Tingay , S., Phillips , C., et al. 2009 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 8952, 1

    2009

  277. [285]

    2009 c , GRB Coordinates Network, 8953, 1

    ---. 2009 c , GRB Coordinates Network, 8953, 1

    2009

  278. [286]

    P., Staley , T

    Mooley , K. P., Staley , T. D., Fender , R. P., et al. 2017 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 20958, 1

    2017

  279. [287]

    2017 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 21058, 1

    ---. 2017 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 21058, 1

    2017

  280. [288]

    2017 c , GRB Coordinates Network, 21212, 1

    ---. 2017 c , GRB Coordinates Network, 21212, 1

    2017

  281. [289]

    2017 d , GRB Coordinates Network, 21466, 1

    ---. 2017 d , GRB Coordinates Network, 21466, 1

    2017

  282. [290]

    2017 e , GRB Coordinates Network, 21465, 1

    ---. 2017 e , GRB Coordinates Network, 21465, 1

    2017

  283. [291]

    2020, , 901, 83, 10.3847/1538-4357/abafaa

    Morgan , R., Soares-Santos , M., Annis , J., et al. 2020, , 901, 83, 10.3847/1538-4357/abafaa

    2020 doi

  284. [292]

    A., Shimokawabe , T., Kudou , Y., Nakajima , H., & Kawai , N

    Mori , Y. A., Shimokawabe , T., Kudou , Y., Nakajima , H., & Kawai , N. 2008, GRB Coordinates Network, 7929, 1

    2008

  285. [293]

    2016, GRB Coordinates Network, 19285, 1

    Muraki , Y., Ono , Y., Fujiwara , T., et al. 2016, GRB Coordinates Network, 19285, 1

    2016

  286. [294]

    L., Miyakawa , K., & Nagayama , T

    Murata , K. L., Miyakawa , K., & Nagayama , T. 2016, GRB Coordinates Network, 19999, 1

    2016

  287. [295]

    L., Niwano , M., Imai , Y., et al

    Murata , K. L., Niwano , M., Imai , Y., et al. 2022, GRB Coordinates Network, 31889, 1

    2022

  288. [296]

    A., Kudou , Y., & Kawai , N

    Nakajima , H., Shimokawabe , T., Mori , Y. A., Kudou , Y., & Kawai , N. 2008, GRB Coordinates Network, 8202, 1

    2008

  289. [297]

    2007, , 442, 166, 10.1016/j.physrep.2007.02.005

    Nakar , E. 2007, , 442, 166, 10.1016/j.physrep.2007.02.005

    2007 doi

  290. [298]

    Nakar , E., Gal-Yam , A., & Fox , D. B. 2006, , 650, 281, 10.1086/505855

    2006 doi

  291. [299]

    D., Sullivan , M., Howell , D

    Neill , J. D., Sullivan , M., Howell , D. A., et al. 2009, , 707, 1449, 10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/1449

    2009 doi

  292. [300]

    2021, GRB Coordinates Network, 31069, 1

    Nicuesa Guelbenzu , A., Klose , S., & Rau , A. 2021, GRB Coordinates Network, 31069, 1

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.