Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 52 references

Equilibria of aggregation-diffusion models with nonlinear potentials

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that stationary states of an aggregation-diffusion model with a nonlinear Riesz potential are exactly optimizers of a Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality, and describes their sharp limit as the fractional parameter goes…

desk verdict A genuine and mostly rigorous extension of Riesz-potential aggregation-diffusion theory to the nonlinear (s,p) case; the main theorems hold up, with one compactness step that needs a real proof. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.20523 v1 pith:YUUHVLQ2 submitted 2025-08-28 math.AP

Francesco Bozzola , Edoardo Mainini This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35K4435R1149K20
keywords aggregation-diffusionequationsnonlinearRieszpotentialstationarystatesHardy-Littlewood-Sobolevinequalitycriticalmassfaircompetitionregimeporousmediumdiffusions-to-0limit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

An aggregation-diffusion equation in which porous-medium diffusion competes with a nonlocal attraction described by a nonlinear Riesz potential has stationary states that are exactly the extremal profiles of a Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality. The paper proves that these extremals are radially decreasing, compactly supported, Hölder-regular, and satisfy an explicit Euler-Lagrange equation. In the diffusion-dominated regime each extremal can be rescaled by a unique dilation into a global minimizer of the free energy for any prescribed mass, while in the fair-competition regime minimizers exist only at a critical mass. As the fractional parameter $s$ goes to zero the interaction becomes a backward diffusion, and the minimizers converge to the characteristic function of a ball, or, at the critical exponent, either vanish uniformly or concentrate into a Dirac mass according to the value of the sensitivity. The interest is that equilibrium questions for a nonlocal evolution equation are settled by a sharp classical inequality, with an explicit asymptotic picture.

What carries the argument

The object that carries the argument is the nonlinear $(s,p)$ Riesz potential $K_{s,p}(\rho)=K_{s/2}*\left(K_{s/2}*\rho\right)^{p'-1}$, with $(s,p)$ energy $I_{s,p}(\rho)=\frac{1}{p'}\int\left(K_{s/2}*\rho\right)^{p'}$ entering $F_{s,p}(\rho)=\frac{1}{m-1}\int\rho^m-\frac{\chi}{p'}I_{s,p}(\rho)$. The Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality (2.3) with sharp constant $H^*_{m,s,p}$ is the tool that controls the aggregation term; existence of extremals comes from the Lieb-Oxford rearrangement-compactness method, the Euler-Lagrange equation from first variations, and regularity from a bootstrap mixing Riesz-potential bounds with $C^{0,\gamma}$ estimates. Mass-invariant dilations $\rho_\lambda(x)=\lambda^N\rho(\lambda x)$ and the critical exponent $m_c=p'-\frac{sp'}{N}$ fix the balance between diffusion and aggregation, and the optimal dilation factor (5.1) converts each HLS extremal into a minimizer of $F_{s,p}$. In the $s\to 0$ passage, Kurokawa's approximation theorem, $K_{s/2}*h\to h$ in $L^p$, is what turns the nonlocal interaction term into a backward diffusion.

What would settle it

For a test case with $p\neq 2$ (for instance $p=3$, $N=2$, $m>p'$), compute the $W^{1,1}$ norm of the minimizers $\rho_s$ as $s\to 0$; an unbounded supremum $\sup_s\|\nabla\rho_s\|_{L^1}$ would falsify Proposition 6.6 and with it the diffusion-dominated part of Theorem 2.2.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is Theorem 2.1: for $1<p<\infty$, $0<sp<N$, and $m>(p^{*}_s)'$ with $p^{*}_s=\frac{Np}{N-sp}$, the best constant in the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev-type inequality $\|K_{s/2}*h\|_{p'}^{p'} \le H\|h\|_1^{p'\vartheta_0}\|h\|_m^{p'(1-\vartheta_0)}$ is attained. Every optimizer is, up to translation, radially nonincreasing, compactly supported, Hölder regular, smooth in the interior of its support, and satisfies $\rho^{m-1}=a\left(K_{s,p}(\rho)-C\right)_+$ for positive constants $a,C$. In the diffusion-dominated case $m>m_c=p'-\frac{sp'}{N}$, each optimizer of mass $M$ has a unique mass-invariant dilation that minimizes $F_{s,p}$ over $Y_M$, and minimizers exist for every mass; in the fair-competition case $m=m_c$, minimizers exist exactly at the critical mass $M_c=\left(\frac{p^{*}_s}{\chi H^{*}_{m_c,s,p}}\right)^{N/(sp')}$ and have zero energy. Theorem 2.2 describes the limit $s\to 0$: for $m>p'$ the minimizers converge strongly in every $L^q$, $1<q<\infty$, to the characteristic function of a ball, the unique minimizer of the limiting functional, while for $m=p'$ they converge uniformly to zero if $0<\chi<p$ and to the point mass $M\delta_0$ in the sense of measures if $\chi>p$.

Load-bearing premise

The $s\to 0$ compactness step is inherited from the linear-potential case $p=2$ by asserting that the proof of the $W^{1,1}$ bound is the same; if that bound does not transfer to $p\neq 2$, Theorem 2.2 loses its compactness and does not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every mass $M>0$ in the diffusion-dominated regime, the free energy has a minimizer, so the evolution equation admits radial, compactly supported, Hölder-regular stationary states.
  • At fair competition, minimizers exist if and only if $M=M_c$; the minimum energy at the critical mass is zero, extending the Keller-Segel critical-mass phenomenon to the nonlinear potential.
  • Every minimizer is an HLS extremal, so stationary states inherit radial monotonicity, compact support, interior smoothness, and the pointwise Euler-Lagrange equation.
  • In the limit $s\to 0$ with $m>p'$, the minimizers converge strongly in $L^q$ to the characteristic function of the explicit ball $\rho_0(x)=\left(\frac{\chi}{p}\right)^{1/(m-p')}\mathbf{1}_{B_{R_0}}(x)$.
  • In the limiting fair-competition case $m=p'$, the threshold $\chi=p$ separates uniform vanishing from concentration to $M\delta_0$ as $s\to 0$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: a quantitative stability estimate for the nonlinear HLS inequality, analogous to the one known for $p=2$, would turn the $s\to 0$ convergence into a rate.
  • Beyond the paper: the threshold behaviour at $m=p'$ suggests a phase transition at $\chi=p$ that could be probed by expanding the energy in powers of $s$; the paper does not perform that expansion.
  • Beyond the paper: uniqueness of stationary states of fixed mass is left open for $p\neq 2$; if established, the one-parameter dilation family would give a complete classification of equilibria.
  • Beyond the paper: the compactness step for $s\to 0$ is taken from the $p=2$ case; checking that the $W^{1,1}$ bound transfers to general $p$ is a concrete way to confirm Theorem 2.2.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies radial stationary states of the aggregation-diffusion equation (1.1) with the nonlinear (s,p) Riesz potential S=K_{s,p}. It proves that, for m>(p*_s)', the sharp constant in the HLS-type inequality (2.3) is attained; every optimizer is radially nonincreasing, compactly supported, Hölder regular, and satisfies the Euler-Lagrange equation (2.4). In the diffusion-dominated and critical regimes these optimizers correspond exactly to minimizers of the free energy F_{s,p}, with an explicit critical mass M_c in the fair-competition case. The second main result describes the limit s→0: for m>p' minimizers converge strongly in L^q to the characteristic function of a ball, while for m=p' they either vanish uniformly (0<χ<p) or concentrate to a point mass (χ>p), with a separate treatment of χ=p.

Significance. If fully established, this is a substantial contribution: it extends the linear-potential theory of [10,19,28] to nonlinear (s,p) potentials, connects HLS extremals to free-energy minimizers via an explicit scaling correspondence, and provides the first s→0 asymptotic analysis in this nonlinear setting. The strategy is coherent and mostly well executed: existence by the Lieb-Oxford symmetrization method, Euler-Lagrange analysis, a regularity bootstrap, and a Γ-convergence framework. The paper is also honest about open problems and states its novel contributions clearly. The main weakness is that a load-bearing compactness argument in the s→0 section is deferred to previous work without showing that the nonlinear case p≠2 is covered by the same proof.

major comments (2)
  1. [§6 (Prop. 6.6); §4.3 (Cor. 4.8)] The W^{1,1} equiboundedness and L^1-compactness step needed for Theorem 6.7, and hence for the m>p' part of Theorem 2.2, is not proved in the manuscript: Proposition 6.6 states that the proof is the same as [28, Lemma 3.7], and Corollary 4.8 is justified only by 'arguing as in [28, Proposition 2.10]'. This is not a routine substitution. In the linear case p=2 one controls derivatives of K_s*ρ through Fourier multipliers; here one must control ∇K_{s/2}*((K_{s/2}*ρ_s)^{p'−1}), a singular integral applied to a nonlinear power of a bounded function. The uniform L∞ bound (Prop. 6.4) and uniform support bound (Prop. 6.5), together with Hölder regularity, do not by themselves imply a uniform W^{1,1} bound, since radial monotone Hölder functions need not be absolutely continuous and may have Cantor-type singular parts. The authors should either reproduce the argument in the p≠2 setting or supply a different proof of the L^1-compactness. As written, Theorem 2.2 (m>p') rests on an unsupported step.
  2. [§4.3, Lemma 4.6] In the proof of compact support, the paper asserts that K_{s,p}(h_s)∈L^{p*_s}(R^N) 'in particular vanishes at infinity'. A function in L^{p*_s} need not tend to zero pointwise. The intended statement may follow from the radial monotonicity of h_s (for instance h_s(x)≤C|x|^{-N}), but this argument is not given. Since compact support is part of Theorem 2.1 and is also used in Corollary 4.8 and Proposition 6.5, this gap should be filled.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§6.3, Prop. 6.10] The displayed identity F_{s,p}(ρ_s)=−sp/(N−sp)∥ρ_s∥_{p'}^{p'} is missing a factor (p−1); the correct coefficient is −sp(p−1)/(N−sp) for general p. The conclusion of the proof is unaffected, but the formula should be corrected.
  2. [§6.2, Prop. 6.5] In the estimate for A1, the power of (R_s−1) is displayed with the wrong sign in the text; also the reference '(6.2)' should be '(3.1)'.
  3. [§6.3, Theorem 6.9] The displayed statement 'lim ∥ρ_s∥∞ = −lim F_{s,p}(ρ_s)' is not a meaningful equality of real-valued limits; it should be phrased as both expressions tending to the same value in [0,∞].
  4. [§4.3, Lemma 4.7] The final step of the Hölder-regularity bootstrap reduces the argument to [19, Theorem 8] and only sketches the iteration; please expand this reduction or state precisely which parts of [19] transfer verbatim to the nonlinear potential case.
  5. [§2 and §4] The notation for the sharp constant is inconsistent: H^*_{m,s,p} in (2.5) versus H^*_{m,s} in (4.1); please unify.
  6. [Throughout] There are several small typos, e.g. 'Corollay 3.3' in Theorem 6.7, 'wich' in Proposition 6.8, and the exponent in the fair-competition energy computation in Proposition 5.3 appears garbled in the displayed formula.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular reduction; the HLS-extremal/minimizer correspondence and critical mass are structural consequences, not fitted inputs. The only caveat is a deferred W^{1,1} compactness proof cited from prior work.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained and non-circular. The HLS-type inequality (2.3) is defined by a supremum over a quotient, the best constant H*_m,s is obtained from classical Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev theory, and the critical mass M_c in (2.5) is derived from that constant rather than fitted to the energy. The correspondence between HLS extremals and minimizers of F_s,p is established by dilation-invariance arguments and Euler-Lagrange analysis (Lemma 4.4, Proposition 5.1, Corollary 5.6), not by assuming the desired conclusion. Similarly, the s-to-0 analysis uses the genuine approximation result Theorem 3.4 and independent equiboundedness/support estimates (Propositions 6.4 and 6.5). The one point that deserves scrutiny is Proposition 6.6, whose proof is deferred to [28, Lemma 3.7] with the sentence 'The proof is the same of [28, Lemma 3.7]', and Corollary 4.8, which is justified by 'arguing as in [28, Proposition 2.10]'; these are self-citations with overlapping authorship and supply a load-bearing compactness step for Theorem 2.2 in the case m > p'. However, this is a transfer of an analogous proof from the linear potential case p = 2, not a reduction of the paper's conclusion to its own inputs. If the W^{1,1} argument does not transfer to the nonlinear potential setting, the compactness step would fail, but that is a correctness or reproducibility gap rather than circularity. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors to forbid alternatives, and no known result is repackaged under new coordinates. Accordingly, the appropriate finding is no significant circularity, with a small score component for the load-bearing deferred proof.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard functional analysis and rearrangement tools plus a modeling assumption that equilibria equal energy critical points. No parameter is fitted to data and no new physical entity is postulated; the nonlinear Riesz potential is adopted from earlier potential theory literature.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequalities and Riesz rearrangement inequalities, including strict equality cases
    Used in Lemma 3.2 and Lemma 4.2 to prove the HLS-type inequality (3.9) and radial symmetry of extremals.
  • standard math Riesz kernel composition and Plancherel identity giving K_{s,2}(rho) = K_s * rho and the functional derivative of I_{s,p}
    Enters in Section 2.1 to define the free energy and to derive the Euler-Lagrange equations for the nonlinear potential.
  • standard math Kurokawa's approximation identity theorem: K_{s/2} * h tends to h in L^p as s tends to 0
    Central to all asymptotic results in Section 6; the paper reproduces the proof in Theorem 3.4.
  • domain assumption The Wasserstein gradient-flow interpretation of the evolution equation and the characterization of stationary states as critical points of F_{s,p}
    The paper studies equilibria through the free energy and its Euler-Lagrange equations; it does not prove the evolution equation is well-posed or that every steady state is a critical point, and radiality of all stationary states is explicitly left open.
  • domain assumption Mass and center-of-mass preservation, encoded in the class Y_M
    All minimizers and HLS extremals are sought in Y_M; if the dynamics did not preserve these constraints, the variational setting would not match the equilibria.
  • standard math Uniform asymptotic bounds on the constants alpha_s, beta_s, H_s as s tends to 0
    Derived in Lemma 3.1 and Corollary 3.3 from the limit (3.1), and used in Propositions 6.4, 6.5, and 6.9 to control minimizers uniformly.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Equilibria of aggregation-diffusion models with nonlinear potentials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YUUHVLQ2

@misc{pith2026250820523,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Equilibria of aggregation-diffusion models with nonlinear potentials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YUUHVLQ2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.20523}
}
abstract

We consider an evolution model with nonlinear diffusion of porous medium type in competition with a nonlocal drift term favoring mass aggregation. The distinguishing trait of the model is the choice of a nonlinear $(s,p)$ Riesz potential for describing the overall aggregation effect. We investigate radial stationary states of the dynamics, showing their relation with extremals of suitable Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequalities. In the case that aggregation does not dominate over diffusion, radial stationary states also relate to global minimizers of a homogeneous free energy functional featuring the $(s,p)$ energy associated to the nonlinear potential. In the limit as the fractional parameter $s$ tends to zero, the nonlocal interaction term becomes a backward diffusion and we describe the asymptotic behavior of the stationary states.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [28]

    Huang, E

    Y. Huang, E. Mainini, J. L. V´ azquez, B. Volzone, Nonlinear aggregation-diffusion equations with Riesz potentials, J. Funct. Anal. 287 (2024), no. 2, Paper No. 110465, 59 pp

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    D. R. Adams and L. I. Hedberg, Function spaces and potential theory, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, 314, Springer, Berlin, 1996

    work page 1996

  3. [2]

    Ambrosio, N

    L. Ambrosio, N. Fusco, D. Pallara, Functions of bounded variation and free discontinuity problems. Oxford Math. Monogr. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 2000

    work page 2000

  4. [3]

    Bian and J.-G

    S. Bian and J.-G. Liu. Dynamic and steady states for multi-dimensional Keller-Segel model with diffusion exponent m > 0. Commun. Math. Phys. , 323(3):1017–1070, 2013

    work page 2013

  5. [4]

    Blanchet, V

    A. Blanchet, V. Calvez, J. A. Carrillo, Convergence of the mass-transport steepest descent scheme for the sub-critical Patlak-Keller-Segel model . SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 46 (2008) 691–721

    work page 2008

  6. [5]

    Blanchet, E

    A. Blanchet, E. Carlen, J. A. Carrillo, Functional inequalities, thick tails and asymptotics for the critical mass Patlak-Keller-Segel model . J. Func. Anal. 262, (2012) 2142-2230

    work page 2012

  7. [6]

    Blanchet, J.A

    A. Blanchet, J.A. Carrillo, P. Lauren¸ cot, Critical mass for a Patlak-Keller-Segel model with degenerate diffusion in higher dimensions . Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 35 (2009), 133–168

    work page 2009

  8. [7]

    Blanchet, J.A

    A. Blanchet, J.A. Carrillo, N. Masmoudi, Infinite time aggregation for the critical Patlak-Keller-Segel model in R2, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 61 (10) (2008), 1449–1481

    work page 2008

Show all 52 references
  1. [8]

    Blanchet, J

    A. Blanchet, J. Dolbeault, B. Perthame, Two-dimensional Keller-Segel model: optimal critical mass and qualitative properties of the solutions . Electron. J. Differential Equations 44 (2006), 32 pp. (electronic)

    2006

  2. [9]

    Burger, V

    M. Burger, V. Capasso, D. Morale, On an aggregation model with long and short range interactions , Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 8 (2007), no. 3, 939–958

    2007

  3. [10]

    Calvez, J

    V. Calvez, J. A. Carrillo, and F. Hoffmann. Equilibria of homogeneous functionals in the fair-competition regime. Nonlinear Anal., 159:85–128, 2017

    2017

  4. [11]

    Calvez, J

    V. Calvez, J. A. Carrillo, and F. Hoffmann. The geometry of diffusing and self-attracting particles in a one-dimensional fair-competition regime. In Nonlocal and nonlinear diffusions and interactions: new methods and directions, volume 2186 of Lecture Notes in Math. , pages 1–...

    2017

  5. [12]

    Calvez, J

    V. Calvez, J. A. Carrillo, and F. Hoffmann. Uniqueness of stationary states for singular Keller-Segel type models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.07788 , 2019

    1905 arXiv

  6. [13]

    J. A. Canizo, https://canizo.org/page/31

  7. [14]

    Carlen, A

    E.A. Carlen, A. Figalli, Stability for a GNS inequality and the log-HLS inequality, with application to the critical mass Keller–Segel equation , Duke Math. J. 162 (3) (2013) 579–625

    2013

  8. [15]

    Carlen, M

    E. Carlen, M. Lewin, E. H. Lieb, R. Seiringer, Stability estimate for the Lane-Emden inequality , preprint arXiv:2410.20113

  9. [16]

    J. A. Carrillo, D. Castorina and B. Volzone, Ground states for diffusion dominated free energies with logarithmic interaction, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 47 (2015), no. 1, 1–25

    2015

  10. [17]

    J. A. Carrillo, M. Fornasier, G. Toscani, and F. Vecil Particle, kinetic, and hydrodynamic models of swarming. In G. Naldi, L. Pareschi, G. Toscani (eds) Mathematical Modeling of Collective Behavior in Socio-Economic and Life Sciences. Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engin...

    2010

  11. [18]

    J. A. Carrillo, S. Hittmeir, B. Volzone, and Y. Yao. Nonlinear aggregation-diffusion equations: radial symmetry and long time asymptotics. Invent. Math., 218 (3): 889–977, 2019

    2019

  12. [19]

    J. A. Carrillo, F. Hoffmann, E. Mainini, B. Volzone, Ground states in the diffusion-dominated regime, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 57 (2018), no. 5, Paper No. 127, 28 pp

    2018

  13. [20]

    Chan, M.d.M

    H. Chan, M.d.M. Gonz´ alez, Y. Huang, E. Mainini, B. Volzone. Uniqueness of entire ground states for the fractional plasma problem. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations , 59: 195 (2020). 36 FRANCESCO BOZZOLA AND EDOARDO MAININI

    2020

  14. [21]

    M. G. Delgadino, X. Yan, and Y. Yao. Uniqueness and non-uniqueness of steady states of aggregation- diffusion equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.09782 , 2019

    1908 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Demengel and G

    F. Demengel and G. Demengel, Functional spaces for the theory of elliptic partial differential equations , translated from the 2007 French original by Reinie Ern´ e, Universitext, Springer, London, 2012 EDP Sci., Les Ulis, 2012

    2007

  16. [23]

    DiBenedetto, Real analysis , second edition, Birkh¨ auser Advanced Texts: Basler Lehrb¨ ucher, Birkh¨ auser/Springer, New York, 2016

    E. DiBenedetto, Real analysis , second edition, Birkh¨ auser Advanced Texts: Basler Lehrb¨ ucher, Birkh¨ auser/Springer, New York, 2016

    2016

  17. [24]

    Dolbeault, B

    J. Dolbeault, B. Perthame, Optimal critical mass in the two dimensional Keller-Segel model in R2, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 339 (2004) 611–616

    2004

  18. [25]

    Gajewski, K

    H. Gajewski, K. Zacharias, Global behaviour of a reaction–diffusion system modelling chemotaxis Math. Nachr. 195 (1998), 77–114

    1998

  19. [26]

    Greco, Y

    D. Greco, Y. Huang, Z. Liu, V. Moroz, Ground states of a non-local variational problem and Thomas- Fermi limit for the Choquard equation , J. London Math. Soc. 111: e70115

  20. [27]

    Horstmann, From 1970 until present: the Keller-Segel model in chemotaxis and its consequences , I

    D. Horstmann, From 1970 until present: the Keller-Segel model in chemotaxis and its consequences , I. Jahresber. Deutsch. Math.-Verein. 105 (2003), 103–165

    2003

  21. [29]

    J¨ ager, S

    W. J¨ ager, S. Luckhaus,On explosions of solutions to a system of partial differential equations modelling chemotaxis, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 329 (1992) 819–824

    1992

  22. [30]

    Keller, L

    E. Keller, L. Segel, Initiation of slime mold aggregation viewed as an instability , J. Theoret. Biol. 26 (1970) 399–415

    1970

  23. [31]

    Keller, L

    E. Keller, L. Segel, Model for chemotaxis , J. Theor. Biol. 30 (1971), 225–234

    1971

  24. [32]

    Kurokawa, On the Riesz and Bessel kernels as approximations of the identity, Sci

    T. Kurokawa, On the Riesz and Bessel kernels as approximations of the identity, Sci. Rep. Kagoshima Univ. No. 30 (1981), 31–45

    1981

  25. [33]

    Leoni, A first course in fractional Sobolev spaces, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, 229, Amer

    G. Leoni, A first course in fractional Sobolev spaces, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, 229, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    E. H. Lieb, Sharp constants in the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev and related inequalities, Ann. of Math. (2) 118 (1983), no. 2, 349–374

    1983

  27. [35]

    E. H. Lieb, M. Loss, Analysis. Second edition. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, 14. American Mathe- matical Society, Providence, RI, 2001

    2001

  28. [36]

    E. Lieb, S. Oxford, Improved lower bound on the indirect Coulomb energy, Int. J. Quantum Chem., 19 (1980), pp. 427–439

    1980

  29. [37]

    Maz’ya, Sobolev spaces with applications to elliptic partial differential equations

    V. Maz’ya, Sobolev spaces with applications to elliptic partial differential equations . Second, revised and augmented edition. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], 342. Springer, Heidelberg, 2011

    2011

  30. [38]

    V. G. Maz’ya, V. P. Havin, Nonlinear potential theory, Usp. Mat. Nauk 27 (1972), 67–138 (in Russian). English translation: Russ. Math. Surv. 27 (1972), 71–148

    1972

  31. [39]

    Mizuta, Potential theory in Euclidean spaces , GAKUTO International Series

    Y. Mizuta, Potential theory in Euclidean spaces , GAKUTO International Series. Mathematical Sciences and Applications, 6, Gakko¯tosho, Tokyo, 1996

    1996

  32. [40]

    Mogilner, L

    A. Mogilner, L. Edelstein-Keshet, A nonlocal model for a swarm, J. Math. Biol. 38 (1999), no. 6, 534–570

    1999

  33. [41]

    Nanjundiah, Chemotaxis, signal relaying and aggregation morphology , J

    V. Nanjundiah, Chemotaxis, signal relaying and aggregation morphology , J. Theor. Biol. 42 (1973), 63– 105

    1973

  34. [42]

    Patlak, Random walk with persistence and external bias , Bull

    C.S. Patlak, Random walk with persistence and external bias , Bull. Math. Biophys. 15 (1953), 311–338

    1953

  35. [43]

    Perthame, Transport Equations in Biology, Frontiers in Mathematics

    B. Perthame, Transport Equations in Biology, Frontiers in Mathematics. Birkh¨ auser, Basel (2006)

    2006

  36. [44]

    Ros-Oton and J

    X. Ros-Oton and J. Serra, Regularity theory for general stable operators, J. Differential Equations 260 (2016), no. 12, 8675–8715

    2016

  37. [45]

    S. G. Samko, A. A. Kilbas and O. I. Marichev, Fractional integrals and derivatives, translated from the 1987 Russian original, Gordon and Breach, Yverdon, 1993

    1987

  38. [46]

    E. M. Stein, The characterization of functions arising as potentials , Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 67 (1961), 102–104

    1961

  39. [47]

    E. M. Stein, Singular integrals and differentiability properties of functions , Princeton Mathematical Se- ries, No. 30, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1970

    1970

  40. [48]

    Y. Sugiyama, Global existence in sub-critical cases and finite time blow-up in super-critical cases to degenerate Keller-Segel systems, Differential Integral Equations 19 (8) (2006) 841–876. EQUILIBRIA OF AGGREGATION-DIFFUSION MODELS WITH NONLINEAR POTENTIALS 37

    2006

  41. [49]

    Taheri, Function spaces and partial differential equations

    A. Taheri, Function spaces and partial differential equations. Vol. 1. Classical analysis , Oxford Lecture Series in Mathematics and its Applications, 40, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2015

    2015

  42. [50]

    R. Temam. A non-linear eigenvalue problem: the shape at equilibrium of a confined plasma. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 60(1):51–73, 1975/76

    1975

  43. [51]

    R. Temam. Remarks on a free boundary value problem arising in plasma physics. Comm. Partial Dif- ferential Equations, 2(6):563–585, 1977

    1977

  44. [52]

    Triebel, Theory of function spaces , reprint of 1983 edition, Modern Birkh¨ auser Classics, Birkh¨ auser/Springer Basel AG, Basel, 2010; (F

    H. Triebel, Theory of function spaces , reprint of 1983 edition, Modern Birkh¨ auser Classics, Birkh¨ auser/Springer Basel AG, Basel, 2010; (F. Bozzola) DIME Dipartimento di ingegneria meccanica, energetica, gestionale e dei trasporti Universit`a di Genova via alla Opera Pia 1...

    1983

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.