Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 40 references

Microfabricated alkali vapor cells with tunable He-Ne buffer gas mixture using reservoirs with laser-actuated break-seals

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Microfabricated Cs vapor cells with laser-opened helium reservoirs shift the buffer-gas turnover temperature from 77 °C to 100 °C, enabling 9×10−11 clock stability at one day.

desk verdict Solid, useful demonstration of post-sealing buffer gas tuning in microfabricated Cs cells; the central effect is real, though the quantitative 'potentiometer' model leans on one inferred helium pressure that should be labeled as a fit. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.00172 v1 pith:WBVPT74F submitted 2025-08-29 physics.atom-ph

Clément Carlé , Andrei Mursa , Gabriel Faure , Shervin Keshavarzi , Quentin Tanguy , Emmanuel Klinger , Vincent Maurice , Rodolphe Boudot
show 1 more author
Nicolas Passilly
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-ph
keywords microfabricatedalkalivaporcellshelium-neonbuffergaslaser-actuatedbreak-sealsturnovertemperaturecoherentpopulationtrappingclockcesiumcellpressuretuningatomicfrequencystability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a fabrication-and-actuation scheme that makes the buffer gas in a sealed microfabricated cesium vapor cell adjustable after the cell is sealed. The cell body is filled with neon at wafer level, while small surrounding reservoirs are sealed with helium; a laser ablates the thin silicon wall of each reservoir on demand, adding a controlled dose of helium to the neon and thereby changing the He:Ne ratio like a potentiometer. The paper's evidence is the measured shift of the clock-frequency turnover temperature—the temperature at which the collisional shift has zero slope—from 77.3 °C in pure neon to 100.1 °C after five reservoirs were opened in one cell, with a second cell following the same trend. A coherent-population-trapping clock using a cell with about 4.5% helium ran at 95 °C and reached 9×10−11 fractional frequency stability at one day, which matters because hotter operation flattens the temperature sensitivity that otherwise dominates clock error.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the laser-actuated break-seal reservoir: each small helium-filled reservoir (about 1.5% of cell volume, or 8% for the two large ones) is separated from the neon-filled science cavity by a 100–150 µm silicon wall that laser ablation can remove on demand. Opening reservoirs one at a time injects discrete helium doses, so the He:Ne ratio r_He = P_He/(P_He+P_Ne) is set by counting opened reservoirs—the paper calls this a potentiometer. The ratio enters the collisional-shift formula whose quadratic-in-temperature coefficients for Ne and He have opposite signs, so the inversion temperature Ti at which dν/dT = 0 moves up as helium is added, according to a = −(δ1+2γ1(Ti−T0))

What would settle it

Take a wafer whose reservoir fill pressure is measured directly during bonding, open the same number of reservoirs in several identical cells, and compare their turnover temperatures: if cell-to-cell scatter is much larger than the ~1 °C scatter shown here, the uniform-pressure assumption fails. Alternatively, burst an unopened reservoir into a calibrated volume and check that the released helium matches the 36 Torr-at-70 °C value the model assumes.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's claim is that low-permeation aluminosilicate windows plus sequentially opened helium reservoirs give precise, post-sealing control of an He-Ne buffer gas ratio in a microfabricated Cs cell. The validation is the turnover temperature Ti of the collisional shift: pure neon gives Ti = 77.3 ± 0.3 °C, and opening 2, 3, and 5 helium reservoirs raises Ti to 84.4, 89.8, and 100.1 °C, which the two-gas model with published Ne and He coefficients maps to helium fractions of 1.2%, 2.3%, and 4.5%. A model assuming roughly 36 Torr of helium per reservoir reproduces the sequence, and a 4.5%-He cell ran in a CPT clock at 95 °C with 9.0×10−11 stability at 10^5 s.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that every helium reservoir was sealed at the same known helium pressure (about 36 Torr); the paper infers this value after the measurements, so if actual fill pressures vary from cell to cell, the model's predicted reservoir count for a target turnover temperature is wrong.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Because Ti depends only on the pressure ratio through Eq. (3), a target turnover temperature maps to a count of reservoirs, making the operating point a designed parameter rather than whatever the wafer fill happened to give.
  • At 95 °C the 4.5% He mixture reduces fractional thermal sensitivity threefold versus pure neon (−5.4×10−10 K−1 to 1.8×10−10 K−1), and 40-fold at 100 °C; temperature control can be relaxed from ±19 mK to ±56 mK at 95 °C and from ±14 mK to ±565 mK at 100 °C.
  • Cells from the same wafer can end up with different gas compositions after dicing, because reservoirs need not be all opened; the wafer-level neon fill and the cell-level helium addition are decoupled.
  • Noble gas buffers do not react with the cesium dispenser, so the dispenser can be reactivated late in the sequence if reservoir openings dilute the atomic density, keeping the clock signal usable.
  • The one-day 9×10−11 stability at 95 °C shows the He-Ne mixture is compatible with CPT clock operation, with the residual drift attributed to helium permeation through uncoated aluminosilicate glass—an addressable limitation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same break-seal scheme with Ne-Ar instead of He-Ne should tune turnover temperatures downward (Ne-Ar is cited as lowering Ti), giving a complementary low-temperature knob; this is not demonstrated in the paper.
  • The 36 Torr helium reservoir pressure is inferred after the fact, so before using the curves predictively it would be worth measuring reservoir pressure directly—e.g., by opening a sibling reservoir into a known volume and comparing the absolute collisional shift.
  • The weeks-long mixing transient implies the effective ratio is set by diffusion equilibration as well as by volumes; a time-resolved mixing model could both speed calibration and allow partial reservoir openings as continuous ratio control.
  • Since the method only determines a noble-gas ratio and is alkali-agnostic, it can be ported to rubidium cells or to magnetometer-optimized pressures, where relaxation is tuned by buffer-gas pressure rather than by clock turnover temperature.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This letter presents a microfabricated Cs vapor cell technology with a tunable He–Ne buffer gas mixture based on wafer-level sealed helium reservoirs that are opened sequentially by laser ablation of break-seals. The science and dispenser cavities are initially filled with neon; opening reservoirs releases helium, changing the buffer gas ratio and thereby the clock-transition turnover (inversion) temperature. Using a CPT clock setup with symmetric auto-balanced Ramsey interrogation, the authors measure the collisional shift versus temperature for cell A: pure neon gives Ti = 77.3°C, and opening 2, 3, and 5 reservoirs raises Ti to 84.4°C, 89.8°C, and 100.1°C, respectively. Cell B shows a similar trend with a smaller slope attributed to thicker reservoir walls. A model using Ne and He pressure-shift coefficients, with an inferred initial helium reservoir pressure of ~36 Torr at 70°C, reproduces the data. A CPT clock using a cell with ~4.5% He reaches 9.0×10^-11 fractional frequency stability at 10^5 s and a reduced thermal sensitivity at 95–100°C compared with pure neon.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this is a meaningful advance for chip-scale atomic clocks and other atomic devices: it provides a post-sealing, sequential method for adjusting the noble-gas mixture without getter or alkali stoichiometry constraints, and it demonstrates operation at elevated turnover temperatures with reduced thermal sensitivity. The qualitative effect is directly supported by the monotonic shifts in two cells, and the long-term stability measurement is a valuable addition. The main weakness is that the quantitative 'potentiometer' calibration is based on a single post hoc fitted helium pressure rather than a directly measured fabrication parameter, so the predictive model of Fig. 3 is not independently validated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV, Fig. 3 and text 'nearly 36 Torr at 70°C'] The initial helium reservoir pressure is not directly measured; it is inferred from the same inversion-temperature data the model is then said to agree with. The statement that the dashed curves 'can thus be used to predict the number of reservoirs' is therefore not supported by an independent test. Please either measure P_He0 during the anodic bonding step (e.g., with a residual-gas analyzer or a witness cell), or calibrate on one cell and validate on the second, and report which data were used for the fit. At minimum, recast Fig. 3 as a fit rather than a predictive calibration and remove 'predict'.
  2. [Section IV, Fig. 3] The model curves for cells A and B are said to use the same inferred P_He0, but the manuscript does not state whether this was a common fit parameter or fixed a priori, nor does it give the actual reservoir volumes (the 100 vs 125 µm wall-thickness explanation is only qualitative). Without this information and without uncertainty bands on the model curves, the two-cell agreement cannot be quantitatively assessed. Please provide the model equations used to generate the dashed lines, the parameter values, and the uncertainty propagation from Ti to the reported He concentrations and pressures.
  3. [Section IV, Eq. (2)–(3) and reported concentrations] The measured Ti values have uncertainties up to ±1.8°C, but the reported helium fractions (1.2%, 2.3%, 4.5%) and the inferred 36 Torr are quoted without error bars. Propagate the Ti uncertainties through the inversion-temperature-to-ratio conversion and through the reservoir model, so the precision of the claimed tuning can be evaluated.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section I and Eq. (3)] The pressure-ratio notation is inconsistent: the introduction defines a = P1/P2, while Eq. (3) uses a = P2/P1. Please harmonize.
  2. [Section II] '100 −150 µm-thick' should use an en dash: 100–150 µm-thick.
  3. [Fig. 4] Axis labels and annotation ('10 11', '10 10', '10 9', '1.3×10 9/ 9×10 16') appear to be missing superscripts; the fitted-line expression is unclear. Please fix the formatting.
  4. [Section II and VI] 'The reservoirs side' should be 'the reservoir side'; 'one of the fabricated cell' should be 'one of the fabricated cells'.
  5. [Reference [9]] 'A V S Quantum Sci.' should be 'AVS Quantum Sci.'.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The Fig. 3 model is calibrated using a post hoc inferred helium reservoir pressure (≈36 Torr) from the same measured inversion temperatures it is then used to 'predict', making the quantitative reservoir-count calibration partly circular; the raw tunability observation is independent.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section IV, Fig. 3 and surrounding text]
    "The experimental data points for the inversion temperature exhibit a nearly linear dependence on the relative volume of opened reservoirs and align well with the theoretical model considering an initial helium pressure of nearly 36 Torr at 70°C. The corresponding curves, shown as the dashed lines in Fig. 3, can thus be used to predict the number of reservoirs that need to be opened to achieve a specific target inversion temperature."

    The 36-Torr initial helium pressure is not reported as a directly measured, controlled fabrication parameter; it is the value that makes the model curves pass through the measured inversion-temperature points. The PHe values shown in Fig. 3 are themselves back-derived from those same measured Ti values via Eq. (3) and the coefficients of Refs. [28,38]. The curves are therefore a one-parameter fit to the data the paper then says they 'predict', so the reservoir-count-to-temperature calibration is interpolation of a fit rather than an independent prediction. The raw observation that Ti increases monotonically with each opening remains direct, non-circular evidence of tunability.

full rationale

The central qualitative result—sequentially opening laser-actuated helium reservoirs shifts the Cs clock turnover temperature from ~77°C to ~100°C—is supported directly by the measured frequency-temperature scans in Fig. 2(b) and does not reduce to any fitted parameter. The buffer-gas shift model, Eqs. (2)-(3), and the helium/neon coefficients come from external literature (Refs. [28,38]), not from this paper, so that part is not circular. The main circularity concern is narrower: the theoretical curves in Fig. 3 are calibrated using an inferred initial helium pressure of 'nearly 36 Torr at 70°C' that is not independently measured or reported as a bonding parameter, and the same measured inversion temperatures are used both to infer the helium concentrations (and thus PHe values) and to validate the model. The statement that the curves 'can thus be used to predict the number of reservoirs' therefore overstates the predictive status: the curves fit the data they are based on. This does not undermine the demonstration of tunability, but it does weaken the quantitative 'potentiometer' calibration claim. No load-bearing self-citation or uniqueness-importing circularity was found: the prior-work citations to Refs. [33-35] support the fabrication approach but are not used to forbid alternatives or to justify the central measured effect.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim relies on standard buffer gas shift physics plus three domain assumptions about the fabrication process (hermeticity, uniform reservoir pressure, SABR suppression). The main free parameter is the initial reservoir helium pressure, inferred from the same data used to validate the model. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Initial helium reservoir pressure (at 70°C) = ~36 Torr
    Not measured. Inferred so that the theoretical curves in Fig. 3 align with the measured turnover temperatures for cells A and B.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The buffer gas collisional shift follows Eq. (2) with the Ne and He coefficients from Refs [28] and [38].
    Used to convert measured inversion temperatures to helium fractions and to build the model curves; these coefficients come from prior measurements on Cs buffer gas cells.
  • domain assumption The SABR interrogation sequence suppresses light shifts sufficiently that Delta-nu_l can be set to zero in Eq. (1).
    If residual light shifts are temperature-dependent, the extracted turnover temperature would be biased. The paper cites previous work [37] for this suppression.
  • domain assumption Aluminosilicate glass windows used in this work have low helium permeation, so the amount of helium in each reservoir is fixed until its break-seal is opened.
    This is the basis of the potentiometer concept; it was established in the group's earlier work [33,34], and the paper acknowledges residual permeation affects long-term stability.
  • domain assumption All helium reservoirs on a wafer are initially sealed at the same helium pressure and have well-defined volumes, so the added helium amount scales linearly with the number of opened reservoirs.
    The Fig. 3 model assumes this additivity; the paper attributes the slope difference between cells A and B to wall thickness, implying volume calibration is needed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Microfabricated alkali vapor cells with tunable He-Ne buffer gas mixture using reservoirs with laser-actuated break-seals." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WBVPT74F

@misc{pith2026250900172,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Microfabricated alkali vapor cells with tunable He-Ne buffer gas mixture using reservoirs with laser-actuated break-seals},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WBVPT74F}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.00172}
}
abstract

This letter reports on the generation of a tunable buffer gas mixture within microfabricated alkali vapor cells. We show that the combination of low-permeation windows with sequential openings of laser-actuated break-seals enables adjustment of a helium-neon (He-Ne) noble gas mixture, fully compatible with alkali metal dispensers. The gas reservoirs and the main cell cavities are initially sealed at the wafer level under distinct helium and neon atmospheres, respectively. Within each cell, after Cs vapor is released from the dispenser, the break-seals are successively actuated to incrementally increase the helium fraction in the buffer gas mixture. This process shifts the atomic clock frequency turnover temperature toward higher values. As an illustration, one of the fabricated cells was operated at 95$^{\circ}$C in a coherent population trapping clock, achieving a fractional frequency stability of 9$\times$10$^{-11}$ at one-day integration time. These results demonstrate the feasibility of precisely tuning buffer gas compositions in microfabricated vapor cells and support the suitability of He-Ne mixtures for miniature atomic clock applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.00172 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Photograph of a wafer of microfabricated cells. The multiple [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Example of temporal trace of the clock frequency for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Inversion temperature as a function of the number of opened [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Allan deviation of a CPT clock based on a Cs-He-Ne micro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Kitching, Chip-scale atomic devices, Appl

    J. Kitching, Chip-scale atomic devices, Appl. Phys. Rev. 5, 031302 (2018)

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Knappe, V

    S. Knappe, V . Shah, P. D. D. Schwindt, L. Hollberg, J. Kitching, L.-A. Liew, and J. Moreland, A microfabricated atomic clock, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 1460 (2004)

    work page 2004

  3. [3]

    Batori, C

    E. Batori, C. Affolderbach, M. Pellaton, F. Gruet, M. Violetti, Y . Su, A. K. Skrivervik, and G. Mileti, µPOP clock: A micro- cell atomic clock based on a double-resonance Ramsey scheme, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 054039 (2023)

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Carlé, M

    C. Carlé, M. Abdel Hafiz, S. Keshavarzi, R. Vicarini, N. Pas- silly, and R. Boudot, Pulsed-CPT Cs-Ne microcell atomic clock with frequency stability below 2×10−12 at 105 s, Opt. Express 31, 8160 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    V . Shah, S. Knappe, P. Schwindt, and J. Kitching, Subpicotesla atomic magnetometry with a microfabricated vapour cell, Na- ture Photonics 1, 649–652 (2007)

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    V . G. Lucivero, A. Zanoni, G. Corrielli, R. Osellame, and M. W. Mitchell, Laser-written vapor cells for chip-scale atomic sens- ing and spectroscopy, Opt. Express 30, 27149 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    J. Zhu, R. Zhao, Z. Li, D. Hao, K. Zu, Y . Shi, J. Tang, and J. Liu, Development of a cesium vapor MEMS cell for differ- ential measurement of microwave electromagnetically induced transparency, IEEE Electron Device Lett. 44, 132 (2022). 6

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    J. Yuan, W. Yang, M. Jing, H. Zhang, Y . Jiao, W. Li, L. Zhang, L. Xiao, and S. Jia, Quantum sensing of microwave electric fields based on Rydberg atoms, Rep. Prog. Phys. 86, 106001 (2023)

    work page 2023

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    Teale, J

    C. Teale, J. Sherman, and J. Kitching, Degenerate two-photon Rydberg atom voltage reference, A VS Quantum Sci.4, 024403 (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    J. M. Pate, J. Kitching, and M. T. Hummon, Microfabricated strontium atomic vapor cells, Opt. Lett. 48, 383 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    Klinger, A

    E. Klinger, A. Mursa, C. M. Rivera-Aguilar, R. Vicarini, N. Pas- silly, and R. Boudot’, Sub-Doppler spectroscopy of the Cs atom 6S1/2-7P1/2 transition at 459 nm in a microfabricated vapor cell, Opt. Lett. 49, 1953 (2024)

    1953

  4. [12]

    Mottola, G

    R. Mottola, G. Buser, and P. Treutlein, Optical memory in a mi- crofabricated rubidium vapor cell, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 260801 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    J. P. McGilligan, K. R. Moore, A. Dellis, G. D. Martinez, E. de Clercq, P. F. Griffin, A. S. Arnold, E. Riis, R. Boudot, and J. Kitching, Laser cooling in a chip-scale platform, Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, 054001 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    Kitching, S

    J. Kitching, S. Knappe, and L. Hollberg, Miniature vapor- cell atomic-frequency references, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 3, 553 (2002)

    2002

  7. [15]

    Chutani, V

    R. Chutani, V . Maurice, N. Passilly, C. Gorecki, R. Boudot, M. Abdel Hafiz, S. Galliou, J.-Y . Rauch, and E. de Clercq, Laser light routing in an elongated micromachined vapor cell with diffraction gratings for atomic clock applications., Sci. Rep. 5, 14001 (2015)

    2015

  8. [16]

    Woetzel, V

    S. Woetzel, V . Schultze, R. Ijsselsteijn, T. Schulz, S. Anders, R. Stolz, and H.-G. Meyer, Microfabricated atomic vapor cell arrays for magnetic field measurements, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 033111 (2011)

    2011

  9. [17]

    S. Dyer, P. F. Griffin, A. Arnold, F. Mirando, D. P. Burt, E. Riis, and J. P. McGilligan, Micro-machined deep silicon atomic va- por cells, J. Appl. Phys. 132, 134401 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    L.-A. Liew, J. Moreland, and V . Gerginov, Wafer-level filling of microfabricated atomic vapor cells based on thin-film de- position and photolysis of cesium azide, Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 114106 (2007)

    2007

  11. [19]

    Knappe, V

    S. Knappe, V . Gerginov, P. D. D. Schwindt, V . Shah, H. G. Robinson, L. Hollberg, and J. Kitching, Atomic vapor cells for chip-scale atomic clocks with improved long-term frequency stability, Opt. Lett. 30, 18, 2351 (2005)

    2005

  12. [20]

    D. G. Bopp, V . M. Maurice, and J. E. Kitching, Wafer-level fabrication of alkali vapor cells using in-situ atomic deposition, J. Phys. Photonics 3, 015002 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    Douahi, L

    A. Douahi, L. Nieradko, J.-C. Beugnot, J. A. Dziuban, H. Mail- lote, S. Guérandel, M. Moraja, C. Gorecki, and V . Giordano, Vapour microcell for chip scale atomic frequency standard, Electron. Lett. 43, 279 (2007)

    2007

  14. [22]

    Vicarini, V

    R. Vicarini, V . Maurice, M. Abdel Hafiz, J. Rutkowski, C. Gorecki, N. Passilly, L. Ribetto, V . Gaff, V . V olant, S. Gal- liou, and R. Boudot, Demonstration of the mass-producible fea- ture of a Cs vapor microcell technology for miniature atomic clocks, Sens. Actuat. A: Phys...

    2018

  15. [23]

    Maurice, J

    V . Maurice, J. Rutkowski, E. Kroemer, S. Bargiel, N. Passilly, R. Boudot, C. Gorecki, L. Mauri, and M. Moraja, Microfab- ricated vapor cells filled with a cesium dispensing paste for miniature atomic clocks, Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 164103 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    S. Kang, R. P. Mott, K. A. Gilmore, L. D. Sorenson, M. T. Rakher, E. A. Donley, J. Kitching, and C. S. Roper, A low- power reversible alkali atom source, Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 244101 (2017)

    2017

  17. [25]

    Martinez, C

    G. Martinez, C. Li, A. Staron, J. Kitching, C. Raman, and W. McGehee, A chip-scale atomic beam clock, Nat. Commun. 14, 10.1038/s41467-023-39166-1 (2023)

    2023 doi

  18. [26]

    McWilliam, S

    A. McWilliam, S. Dyer, D. Hunter, M. Mrozowski, S. Ingleby, O. Sharp, D. Burt, P. Griffin, J. McGilligan, and E. Riis, Op- timizing longitudinal spin relaxation in miniaturized optically pumped magnetometers, Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, 064024 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Vanier, R

    J. Vanier, R. Kunski, N. Cyr, J. Savard, and M. Tetu, On hyper- fine frequency shifts caused by buffer gases: application to the optically pumped passive rubidium frequeny standard, J. Appl. Phys. 87, 5387 (1982)

    1982

  20. [28]

    Kozlova, S

    O. Kozlova, S. Guérandel, and E. de Clercq, Temperature and pressure shift of the Cs clock transition in the presence of buffer gases: Ne, N2, Ar, Phys. Rev. A 83, 062714 (2011)

    2011

  21. [29]

    Y . Li, M. R. Slot, M. T. Hummon, S. Schima, and J. Kitching, Wafer-scale fabrication of temperature-compensated alkali va- por cells, Appl. Phys. Lett. 126, 224001 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    S. Dyer, A. McWillian, D. Hunter, S. Ingleby, D. P. Burt, O. Sharp, F. Mirando, P. F. Griffin, E. Riis, and J. P. McGilligan, Nitrogen buffer gas pressure tuning in a micro-machined vapor cell, Appl. Phys. Lett. 123, 074001 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Boudot, D

    R. Boudot, D. Miletic, P. Dziuban, C. Affolderbach, P. Knap- kiewicz, J. Dziuban, G. Mileti, and V . Giordano, First-order cancellation of the Cs clock frequency temperature-dependence in Ne-Ar buffer gas mixture, Opt. Express 19, 3106 (2011)

    2011

  24. [32]

    Kroemer, M

    E. Kroemer, M. Abdel Hafiz, V . Maurice, B. Fouilland, C. Gorecki, and R. Boudot, Cs vapor microcell with Ne-He buffer gas mixture for high operation-temperature miniature atomic clocks, Opt. Express 23, 18373 (2015)

    2015

  25. [33]

    Carlé, S

    C. Carlé, S. Keshavarzi, A. Mursa, P. Karvinen, R. Chutani, S. Bargiel, S. Queste, R. Vicarini, P. Abbé, M. Abdel Hafiz, V . Maurice, R. Boudot, and N. Passilly, Reduction of helium permeation in microfabricated cells using aluminosilicate glass substrates and Al 2O3 coatings,...

    2023

  26. [34]

    Carlé, A

    C. Carlé, A. Mursa, P. Karvinen, R. Chutani, V . Maurice, R. Boudot, and N. Passilly, On the reduction of gas permeation through the glass windows of micromachined vapor cells using Al2O3 coatings, J. Appl. Phys. 136, 085102 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Maurice, C

    V . Maurice, C. Carlé, S. Keshavarzi, R. Chutani, S. Queste, L. Gauthier-Manuel, J.-M. Cote, R. Vicarini, M. Abdel Hafiz, R. Boudot, and N. Passilly, Wafer-level vapor cells filled with laser-actuated hermetic seals for integrated atomic devices, Mi- crosyst. Nanoeng. 8, 129 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Abdel Hafiz, G

    M. Abdel Hafiz, G. Coget, M. Petersen, C. E. Calosso, S. Guérandel, E. de Clercq, and R. Boudot, Symmetric auto- balanced Ramsey interrogation for high-performance coherent- population-trapping vapor-cell atomic clock, Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 244102 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    Abdel Hafiz, C

    M. Abdel Hafiz, C. Carlé, N. Passilly, J.-M. Danet, C. E. Calosso, and R. Boudot, Light-shift mitigation in a microcell- based atomic clock with symmetric auto-balanced Ramsey spectroscopy, Appl. Phys. Lett. 120, 064101 (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    Beverini, F

    N. Beverini, F. Strumia, and G. Rovera, Buffer gas pressure shift in the mF = 0 → mF = 0 ground state hyperfine line in Cs, Opt. Commun. 37, 394 (1981)

    1981

  31. [39]

    P. T. Boggs, J. R. Donaldson, R. h. Byrd, and R. B. Schnabel, Algorithm 676: ODRPACK: software for weighted orthogo- nal distance regression, ACM Trans. Math. Softw.15, 348–364 (1989)

    1989

  32. [40]

    Kozlova, R

    O. Kozlova, R. Boudot, S. Guérandel, and E. de Clercq, Tem- perature dependence cancellation of the Cs clock frequency in the presence of Ne buffer gas, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 60, 2262 (2011)

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.