Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 75 references

Towards High-Fidelity and Controllable Bioacoustic Generation via Enhanced Diffusion Learning

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read BirdDiff synthesizes recognisable bird-call waveforms directly from noisy field recordings, cutting Fréchet Audio Distance from 0.590 to 0.213 and raising classifier-recognised species identity from 35.9% to 70.1%.

desk verdict The enhancement's headline SNR gain is built into the signal definition, but the diffusion results show a promising direction if the evaluation is tightened. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.00318 v1 pith:TAJWAUPC submitted 2025-08-30 cs.SD eess.AS

Tianyu Song , Ton Viet Ta This is my paper
classification cs.SDeess.AS
keywords bioacousticsbirdcallsynthesisdiffusionmodelsaudioenhancementspectralsubtractionmultimodalconditioningwaveformgenerationFréchetDistance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that generative models can synthesize realistic, species-specific bird calls directly as waveforms from noisy field recordings, rather than from spectrograms or clean studio audio. To do this, it introduces BirdDiff, which first passes the recordings through a multi-band adaptive enhancement stage, then runs a diffusion-based generator conditioned on MFCC features, species labels, and textual descriptions. The reported result is that this combination sharply improves objective audio quality and species identity on a 12-species noisy dataset compared with DiffWave trained on unprocessed audio. The reason to care is that, if the approach holds, it offers a path to supplement scarce or endangered-species datasets and to generate controllable bird-call audio for monitoring and ecological simulation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the 'zeroth layer': multi-band adaptive bird-call enhancement (MABE). It decomposes the signal into four overlapping frequency bands, assigns energy- and relevance-based weights, reconstructs an enhanced signal estimate, and applies spectral subtraction only to a residual noise reference, so the frequency bands that carry bird-call content are preserved rather than aggressively denoised. The second mechanism is multimodal conditioning: MFCCs, a learnable species-label embedding, and a text embedding are fused by a learnable softmax-weighted sum that conditions a DiffWave diffusion backbone generating raw waveforms.

What would settle it

Annotate the actual call intervals in a held-out set by an expert, recompute SegSNR using the annotated signal rather than the 2–8 kHz band-pass proxy, and retrain the classifier only on those held-out clean calls before classifying BirdDiff outputs; the central claim is falsified if the SNR gain collapses and generated-call accuracy drops to DiffWave levels.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a lightweight, task-specific enhancement stage—not a larger generator—is what unlocks high-fidelity bird-call synthesis from noisy recordings. Applying the multi-band adaptive enhancement ('zeroth layer') before a DiffWave-style diffusion backbone reduces Fréchet Audio Distance by 52.4% and raises classifier accuracy from 35.9% to 55.6%; adding multimodal conditioning (MFCC, species label, text) further brings FAD to 0.213 and classification accuracy to 70.1%, with 8 of 12 species above 70%. The authors conclude that direct waveform generation from noisy field data is feasible, that the enhancement is essential to keep the diffusion model from learning noise distrib

Load-bearing premise

The claim that enhancement improves SNR by +10.45 dB depends on treating a 2–8 kHz band-pass filtered version of each recording as the true bird-call signal and everything else as noise; if calls carry energy outside that band or noise overlaps it, the gain is partly an artifact of that definition.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Waveform-level synthesis from noisy field data becomes practical for the 12 tested bird species without requiring separate denoising datasets.
  • The enhancement stage can be used as a preprocessing module in front of diffusion audio models trained on other noisy bioacoustic recordings.
  • Classification accuracy on generated calls can serve as a species-identity preservation check when subjective human evaluation is unreliable.
  • Text-conditioned control lets users steer generation with short descriptions such as 'Quail morning call', offering a path to controllable augmentation for ecological studies.
  • Because enhancement alone accounts for most of the quality gain, the approach suggests that task-specific preprocessing deserves attention before scaling up generative backbones in noisy domains.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is to reconstruct the noise-free reference from manually annotated bird-call segments rather than the 2–8 kHz band-pass proxy and rerun the SNR comparison; the +10.45 dB gain may shrink or grow depending on how much real call energy lies outside that band.
  • The observed decoupling between FAD and classification accuracy for categories like Common Buzzard suggests that bioacoustic generators need a species-identity metric alongside distribution-distance metrics; a combined score could be explored.
  • The same two-stage recipe—adaptive enhancement plus conditional diffusion—could be adapted to other taxa by replacing the frequency-band set and conditioning modalities, though the paper does not claim this.
  • Because the classifier used for evaluation is trained on the original dataset, reported accuracy may partly reflect sensitivity to enhancement artifacts; an independent classifier trained on clean held-out recordings would be a stronger check.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes BirdDiff, a generative framework for synthesizing bird call waveforms from noisy field recordings. The method couples a 'zeroth layer' multi-band adaptive enhancement stage (MABE) with a DiffWave-based diffusion generator conditioned on MFCCs, species labels, and textual descriptions. The authors report a +10.45 dB SegSNR improvement and low Itakura–Saito Distance for the enhancement stage, and improved generation quality over DiffWave: FAD 0.590→0.213, JSD 0.259→0.226, NDB 7.33→5.58, and ResNet50 classification accuracy rising from 35.9% to 70.1%. The paper concludes that BirdDiff enables high-fidelity, controllable bird call generation directly from noisy field recordings.

Significance. If the claims hold, this work would be a useful contribution to bioacoustics data augmentation and controllable audio synthesis: direct waveform generation from noisy field recordings is practically relevant, and the multimodal conditioning (labels plus text) is an interesting design choice. The paper includes a clear ablation (unenhanced DiffWave vs. enhanced DiffWave vs. full BirdDiff), comparison with traditional augmentation, and candid acknowledgment of evaluation limitations. However, the significance is conditional: the central enhancement claim rests on a potentially circular SNR definition, the algorithm is under-specified, and the generation metrics are computed against the same noisy corpus used for training. These issues must be resolved before the claims can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.2, §2.4, Table 1] The +10.45 dB SegSNR gain is largely built into the definitions. s_est is defined as a 2–8 kHz band-pass of x, and noise as x − s_est; MABE's output is a weighted sum of band-passed bands plus a processed residual, and the residual is suppressed. Any method that preserves 2–8 kHz and attenuates its complement will inflate this SNR measure, regardless of perceptual or ecological fidelity. The internal inconsistency compounds the problem: Algorithm 1's s_est is a weighted sum of four bands (1500–3000, 2500–5000, 4000–8000, 7000–11000), not the 2–8 kHz band used in the SNR evaluation. Fig. 4's Woodcock example spans 1000–7000 Hz, so informative content below 2 kHz is treated as noise. Re-evaluate SNR against clean reference annotations or a full-band signal definition, and report distortion outside the 2–8 kHz band.
  2. [Algorithm 1] The key functions AdaptiveWeight(bi, x), AdaptStrength(SNRest), SelectNoiseReference(rrn), and the spectral subtraction variant are undefined. Band weights wi and strength α' are free parameters with no fitting procedure. Without these, the enhancement stage is not reproducible and the claimed +10.45 dB cannot be independently verified. Specify formulas, defaults, and any hyperparameter search.
  3. [§2.4, §4] FAD, JSD/NDB, and ResNet50 accuracy are all computed against the same noisy original dataset used for training; the classifier is trained on the original noisy data and the paper concedes this 'does not fully address species-identity preservation.' Thus these metrics measure similarity to the noisy corpus, not fidelity to clean bird calls. To support 'high-fidelity generation from noisy field recordings,' report metrics on a clean/annotated subset, use an independent classifier, and include expert listening or a perceptual experiment.
  4. [Tables 2 and 3] For the same BirdDiff model, Table 2 reports FAD=0.213, JSD=0.226, NDB=5.58, accuracy=70.10%, while Table 3's average row reports FAD=0.209, JSD=0.287, NDB=5, accuracy=68.65%. The sampling protocol differs (100 samples per category, 5 runs vs. all data?) but this is not explained. Also, Table 3 is referenced twice—once for the augmentation comparison and again for the per-category breakdown—yet contains both. Clarify evaluation sets and reconcile or explain the discrepancy.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§2.2 / Table 1] The acronym MABE is used in Table 1 but defined only in Section 3; define it in §2.2.
  2. [Throughout] Terminology is inconsistent: 'species', 'categories', and 'bird categories' are used interchangeably. For example, §2.1 calls the 12 groups 'categories' and then refers to each as a 'species.'
  3. [§2.1, §2.4] Typos and undefined notation: 'W A V format' should be 'WAV format'; 'xbase' in §2.4 is not defined; the SegSNR equation uses 'sest/nest' while the text uses 's_est/n_est.'
  4. [§2.4] The FAD implementation is underspecified: what embedding or feature extractor is used? Reference [63] is about music enhancement; state the exact audio embedding used for FAD computation.
  5. [References] The reference list contains many entries not cited in the body (e.g., [17]–[55]), many unrelated to bioacoustics. These should be pruned to keep only works that are actually discussed.
  6. [§4] The admitted limitation that generated calls resemble their conditioning spectrograms should be quantified or illustrated, since it bears on the diversity claim.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

SNR gain is built into the band-pass signal definition; generation metrics remain external benchmarks

  1. self definitional [Section 2.2 (SegSNR definition and Algorithm 1), Table 1]
    "sest is obtained by applying a band-pass filter between 2–8 kHz to the waveform x, and the residual is taken as the noise estimate nest = x − sest. ... Algorithm 1: 5: sest ← P i wi P j wj · bi; 6: rrn ← x − sest; 7: SNRest ← SegSNR(sest, rrn). Table 1: Ours (MABE) +10.45 dB"

    The 'signal' that defines SegSNR is, by the paper's own construction, a 2–8 kHz band-pass of the input; the 'noise' is its complement. The zeroth layer is explicitly designed to preserve band-passed components (sest) and to attenuate only the residual (rrn = x − sest). Hence the numerator of SegSNR is exactly the component the method keeps, and the denominator is exactly the component it suppresses. The reported +10.45 dB gain is therefore a metric artifact: any method that keeps the 2–8 kHz band and suppresses its complement would show a similar gain by construction. The paper even overloads 'sest': the SNR definition's sest (2–8 kHz band-pass) differs from Algorithm 1's sest (weighted sum of 1.5–11 kHz bands), so the gain is evaluated relative to the method's own band selection rather th

full rationale

The paper's central generative contribution—BirdDiff's diffusion backbone with multimodal conditioning—is evaluated against a fixed baseline (DiffWave on unenhanced data) using FAD, JSD, NDB, and a ResNet50 classifier trained on the original dataset. These are external benchmarks and are not derived from the model's own definitions; the improvement in FAD (0.590→0.213) etc. therefore has independent content. The circularity is confined to the zeroth-layer SNR claim. Section 2.2 defines the 'signal' for SegSNR as the 2–8 kHz band-pass of x and 'noise' as the residual, and Algorithm 1 constructs s_est from exactly the bands meant to be preserved, then evaluates SNRest = SegSNR(s_est, rrn). Any enhancer that keeps that band and attenuates the complement will report a large SNR gain by construction. The paper also switches between the 2–8 kHz definition and the 1.5–11 kHz multi-band s_est, so the +10.45 dB is tied to its own band selection. The self-citations in the reference list are not load-bearing; none is invoked as an external uniqueness theorem or as the justification for the enhancement/diffusion design. Accordingly the score reflects one central metric reduction (6), not full derivation-by-definition.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the band-pass signal/noise decomposition, the proprietary dataset labels, and the classifier-based evaluation. The enhancement band choices and fusion weights are fitted or unspecified, and no independent benchmark is used.

free parameters (4)
  • Multi-band frequency edges B = (1500,3000), (2500,5000), (4000,8000), (7000,11000) Hz
    Hand-chosen based on experiments on the dataset, as stated in Section 2.2.
  • Signal band for SNR estimation = 2-8 kHz
    Used to define signal vs noise; the same band overlaps the enhancement bands, making the SNR metric partly circular.
  • Multimodal fusion weights alpha1, alpha2, alpha3 = Not reported (learned)
    Learnable softmax weights in the conditioning fusion (Section 2.3); values not given.
  • Adaptive weight function wi and strength alpha' = Undefined
    Algorithm 1 calls AdaptiveWeight and AdaptStrength without specifying the functions, so these are implicit free choices.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Bird calls are separable from noise by linear band-pass filtering in 2-8 kHz
    Used to define s_est and n_est for SNR and enhancement (Section 2.2, 2.4).
  • domain assumption The proprietary dataset labels are correct for 12 categories
    All training and evaluation depends on the manual annotations provided by Bird Data Technology (Section 2.1).
  • domain assumption ResNet50 trained on the original dataset is a valid proxy for species identity in generated audio
    Used as the main identity-preservation metric (Section 2.4).
  • domain assumption DiffWave is an appropriate backbone for bird call generation
    The paper builds on DiffWave without comparing against other generative architectures (Section 2.3).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Towards High-Fidelity and Controllable Bioacoustic Generation via Enhanced Diffusion Learning." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TAJWAUPC

@misc{pith2026250900318,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Towards High-Fidelity and Controllable Bioacoustic Generation via Enhanced Diffusion Learning},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TAJWAUPC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.00318}
}
read the original abstract

Generative modeling offers new opportunities for bioacoustics, enabling the synthesis of realistic animal vocalizations that could support biomonitoring efforts and supplement scarce data for endangered species. However, directly generating bird call waveforms from noisy field recordings remains a major challenge. We propose BirdDiff, a generative framework designed to synthesize bird calls from a noisy dataset of 12 wild bird species. The model incorporates a "zeroth layer" stage for multi-scale adaptive bird-call enhancement, followed by a diffusion-based generator conditioned on three modalities: Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients, species labels, and textual descriptions. The enhancement stage improves signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) while minimizing spectral distortion, achieving the highest SNR gain (+10.45 dB) and lowest Itakura-Saito Distance (0.54) compared to three widely used non-training enhancement methods. We evaluate BirdDiff against a baseline generative model, DiffWave. Our method yields substantial improvements in generative quality metrics: Fr\'echet Audio Distance (0.590 to 0.213), Jensen-Shannon Divergence (0.259 to 0.226), and Number of Statistically-Different Bins (7.33 to 5.58). To assess species-specific detail preservation, we use a ResNet50 classifier trained on the original dataset to identify generated samples. Classification accuracy improves from 35.9% (DiffWave) to 70.1% (BirdDiff), with 8 of 12 species exceeding 70% accuracy. These results demonstrate that BirdDiff enables high-fidelity, controllable bird call generation directly from noisy field recordings.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M., Lostanlen, V., Cramer, A., Salamon, J., Dokter, A., Kelling, S., Bello, J

    Van Doren, B. M., Lostanlen, V., Cramer, A., Salamon, J., Dokter, A., Kelling, S., Bello, J. P., and Farnsworth, A., Automated acoustic monitoring captures timing and intensity of bird migration,Journal of Applied Ecology, 60(3):433–444, (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    V., Advancing bird classification: Harnessing PSA-DenseNet for call-based recognition, In: Ta, T.V., Nguyen, L.T.H

    Song, T., and Ta, T. V., Advancing bird classification: Harnessing PSA-DenseNet for call-based recognition, In: Ta, T.V., Nguyen, L.T.H. (eds) Proceedings of Workshop on Interdisciplinary Sciences 2023. WIS 2023. Mathematics for Industry, vol 38. Springer, Singapore, (2024)

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Song, T., Nguyen, L. T. H., and Ta, T. V., MPSA-DenseNet: A novel deep learning model for English accent classification, Computer Speech & Language, 89:101676 (2025)

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Tian, K., Jiang, Y., Yuan, Z., Peng, B., and Wang, L., Visual autoregressive modeling: Scalable image generation via next-scale prediction,Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , vol. 37, pp. 84839–84865, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Goodfellow, I. J., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., and Bengio, Y., Generative adversarial nets, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , (2014), 27

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    A., Bastings, J., Poole, B., van den Berg, R., and Salimans, T., Autoregressive diffusion models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.02037 , (2021)

    Hoogeboom, E., Gritsenko, A. A., Bastings, J., Poole, B., van den Berg, R., and Salimans, T., Autoregressive diffusion models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.02037 , (2021). 15

    arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Ho, J., Jain, A., and Abbeel, P., Denoising diffusion probabilistic models, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , (2020), 6840– 6851

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Lemercier, J.-M., Richter, J., Welker, S., Moliner, E., V¨ alim¨ aki, V., and Gerk- mann, T., Diffusion Models for Audio Restoration: A review, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 72–84, 2024

    work page 2024

Show all 75 references
  1. [10]

    S., Ma, J., Thomas, M

    Kushwaha, S. S., Ma, J., Thomas, M. R. P., Tian, Y., and Bruni, A., Diff-SAGe: End-to-End Spatial Audio Generation Using Diffusion Models, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), (2025), pp. 1–5. doi:10.1109/ICASSP4...

    2025

  2. [11]

    13136–13140

    Grassucci, E., Marinoni, C., Rodriguez, A., and Comminiello, D., Diffusion Mod- els for Audio Semantic Communication, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) , (2024), pp. 13136–13140. doi:10.1109/ICASSP48485.2024.10447612

    2024

  3. [12]

    Herbst, C., Jeantet, L., and Dufourq, E., Empirical Evaluation of Variational Autoencoders and Denoising Diffusion Models for Data Augmentation in Bioa- coustics Classification, Proceedings of the Annual Conference of South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Informat...

    2024

  4. [13]

    Kumar, S., Li, J., and Zhang, Y., Vision Transformer Segmentation for Visual Bird Sound Denoising, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09167 , (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  5. [14]

    and Li, J., BirdSoundsDenoising: Deep Visual Audio Denoising for Bird Sounds, Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) , (2023), pp

    Zhang, Y. and Li, J., BirdSoundsDenoising: Deep Visual Audio Denoising for Bird Sounds, Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) , (2023), pp. 2248–2257

    2023

  6. [15]

    Shim, J. Y., Kim, J., and Kim, J.-K., S2I-Bird: Sound-to-Image Generation of Bird categories using Generative Adversarial Networks, Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), pp. 2226–2232, (2021)

    2021

  7. [16]

    Guei, A.-C., Christin, S., Lecomte, N., and Hervet, ´E., ECOGEN: Bird sounds generation using deep learning, Methods in Ecology and Evolution , 15(1):69–79, 2024

    2024

  8. [17]

    Sucianto, M., Ta, T. V. (2025). Machine Learning-Based Classification of Protein Mutation Stability via Binding Free Energy. Preprint submitted to a journal. 16

    2025

  9. [18]

    D., Le, T

    Song, T., Duong, V. D., Le, T. P., Ta, T. V. (2025). Deep Learning for Automated Identification of Vietnamese Timber Species: A Tool for Ecological Monitoring and Conservation. arXiv:2508.10938 (2025). Preprint submitted to a journal

    2025 arXiv

  10. [19]

    Qi and T

    J. Qi and T. V. Ta, Modeling predator-prey dynamics with stochastic differential equations: patterns of collective hunting and nonlinear predation effects, preprint submitted to a journal

  11. [20]

    J. Qi, T. Casse, M. Harada, L. T. H. Nguyen, T. V. Ta, Quantifying fish school fragmentation under predation using stochastic differential equations, arXiv:2508.00953 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  12. [21]

    Kumabe, S., Song, T., Ta, T. V. (2025). Stochastic forest transition model dynam- ics and parameter estimation via deep learning. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 22(5), 1243–1262

    2025

  13. [22]

    T., Casse, T., Ta, T

    Do, N. T., Casse, T., Ta, T. V. (2025). Actor-centered power and forest gover- nance: Can a conceptual framework help us understand the conflict in managing national parks in Vietnam? Forest Policy and Economics , 174, 103482

    2025

  14. [23]

    Gao, Y., Banerjee, M., Ta, T. V. (2025). Dynamics of infectious diseases in preda- tor–prey populations: A stochastic model, sustainability, and invariant measure. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation , 227, 103–120

    2025

  15. [24]

    D., Nguyen, L

    Hartono, A. D., Nguyen, L. T. H., Ta, T. V. (2024). A stochastic differential equation model for predator-avoidance fish schooling. Mathematical Biosciences, 367, 109112

    2024

  16. [25]

    Ta, T. V. (2021). Strict solutions to stochastic semilinear evolution equations in M-type 2 Banach spaces. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis , 20, 1867–1891

    2021

  17. [26]

    Ta, T. V. (2018). Dynamical system for animal coat pattern model. Journal of Elliptic and Parabolic Equations , 4, 525–564

    2018

  18. [27]

    V., Nguyen, L

    Ta, T. V., Nguyen, L. T. H. (2018). A stochastic differential equation model for foraging behavior of fish schools. Physical Biology, 15(3), 036007

    2018

  19. [28]

    Ta, T. V. (2018). Existence results for linear evolution equations of parabolic type. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis , 17, 751–785

    2018

  20. [29]

    V., Yamamoto, Y., Yagi, A

    Ta, T. V., Yamamoto, Y., Yagi, A. (2018). Strict solutions to stochastic linear evolution equations in M-type 2 Banach spaces.Funkcialaj Ekvacioj, 61, 191–217

    2018

  21. [30]

    V., Yagi, A., Yamamoto, Y

    Ta, T. V., Yagi, A., Yamamoto, Y. (2017). Maximal regularity for non- autonomous stochastic linear evolution equations in UMD Banach spaces. Proceedings Mathematical Sciences, 127, 857–879. 17

    2017

  22. [31]

    Ta, T. V. (2017). Non-autonomous stochastic evolution equations in Banach spaces of martingale type 2: strict solutions and maximal regularity. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems , 37, 4507–4542

    2017

  23. [32]

    Ta, T. V. (2017). Note on abstract stochastic semilinear evolution equations. Journal of the Korean Mathematical Society , 54, 909–943

    2017

  24. [33]

    V., Nguyen, L

    Ta, T. V., Nguyen, L. T. H., Yagi, A. (2017). A sustainability condition for stochastic forest model.Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis , 16, 699– 718

    2017

  25. [34]

    Nguyen, L. T. H., Ta, T. V., Yagi, A. (2016). Obstacle avoiding patterns and cohesiveness of fish school. Journal of Theoretical Biology , 406, 116–123

    2016

  26. [35]

    Ta, T. V. (2016). Regularity of solutions of abstract linear evolution equations. Lithuanian Mathematical Journal , 56, 268–290

    2016

  27. [36]

    L. T. H. Nguyen, T. V. Ta, and A. Yagi, Quantitative investigations for ODE model describing fish schooling, Sci. Math. Jpn., vol. 77, No. 3 (2014), pp. 403– 413, [Scientiae Mathematicae Japonicae Online, e-2014, pp. 97–107]

    2014

  28. [37]

    V., Nguyen, L

    Ta, T. V., Nguyen, L. T. H., Yagi, A. (2014). Flocking and non-flocking behavior in a stochastic Cucker-Smale system. Analysis and Applications , 12, 63–73

    2014

  29. [38]

    V., Yagi, A

    Uchitane, T., Ta, T. V., Yagi, A. (2012). An ordinary differential equation model for fish schooling. Scientiae Mathematicae Japonicae, 75, 339–350

    2012

  30. [39]

    V., Yamamoto, Y., Nguyen, D

    Ta, T. V., Yamamoto, Y., Nguyen, D. H., Yagi, A. (2011). Asymptotic behaviour of solutions to stochastic phase transition model. Scientiae Mathematicae Japon- icae, 73, 143–156

    2011

  31. [40]

    Yagi, A., Ta, T. V. (2011). Dynamic of a stochastic predator-prey population. Applied Mathematics and Computation , 218, 3100–3109

    2011

  32. [41]

    Nguyen, L. T. H., Ta, T. V. (2011). Dynamics of a stochastic ratio-dependent predator-prey model. Analysis and Applications , 9, 329–344

    2011

  33. [42]

    H., Nguyen, D

    Nguyen, D. H., Nguyen, D. H., Ta, T. V. (2011). Asymptotic behaviour of predator-prey systems perturbed by white noise.Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, 115, 351–370

    2011

  34. [43]

    V., Nguyen, H

    Ta, T. V., Nguyen, H. T. (2011). Dynamics of species in a model with two preda- tors and one prey. Nonlinear Analysis, Theory, Methods and Applications , 74, 4868–4881

    2011

  35. [44]

    V., Yagi, A

    Ta, T. V., Yagi, A. (2011). Dynamics of a stochastic predator-prey model with the Beddington-De Angelis functional response. Communications on Stochastic Analysis, 5, 371–386. 18

    2011

  36. [45]

    Ta, T. V. (2010). Dynamics of the stochastic equation of cooperative population. Vietnam Journal of Mathematics , 38, 143–155

    2010

  37. [46]

    Ta, T. V. (2010). Survival of three species in a non-autonomous Lotka-Volterra system. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications , 362, 427–437

    2010

  38. [47]

    H., Ta, T

    Ta, Q. H., Ta, T. V., Nguyen, L. T. H. (2009). Dynamics of a non- autonomous three-dimensional population system.Electronic Journal of Differen- tial Equations , 157, 1–12

    2009

  39. [48]

    Ta, T. V. (2009). Dynamics of species in a non-autonomous Lotka-Volterra system. Acta Mathematica Academiae Paedagogiace Ny ´ ıregyh´ aziensis, 25, 45–54

    2009

  40. [49]

    Cheng, Y., Nguyen, L. T. H., Ozaki, A., Ta, T. V. (2024). Deep learning-based method for weather forecasting: A case study in Itoshima. In Ta, T. V., Nguyen, L. T. H. (eds) Proceedings of Workshop on Interdisciplinary Sciences 2023. WIS

    2024

  41. [50]

    T., Ta, T

    Dao, T. T., Ta, T. V., Ta, T. H. T. (2024). MATLAB-based application for efficient huntington’s disease screening. In Ta, T. V., Nguyen, L. T. H. (eds) Pro- ceedings of Workshop on Interdisciplinary Sciences 2023. WIS 2023. Mathematics for Industry , vol 38. Springer, Singapore

    2024

  42. [51]

    D., Ta, T

    Hartono, A. D., Ta, T. V., Nguyen, L. T. H. (2023). A geometrical structure for predator-avoidance fish schooling. Proceedings of Forum ”Math-for-Industry” 2022 - Mathematics of Public Health and Sustainability , 75–89

    2023

  43. [52]

    Nguyen, L. T. H., Ta, T. V., Yagi, A. (2021). A brief review of some swarm- ing models using stochastic differential equations. In Cheng, J., Dinghua, X., Saeki, O., Shirai, T. (eds) Proceedings of the Forum ”Math-for-Industry” 2018. Mathematics for Industry , vol 35. Springer...

    2021

  44. [53]

    Nguyen, L. T. H., Ta, T. V., Yagi, A. (2017). Mathematical models for fish school- ing. Proceedings of the Vietnam International Applied Mathematics Conference . arXiv:2508.08310 (2025)

    2017 arXiv

  45. [54]

    Nguyen, L. T. H., Ta, Q. H., Ta, T. V. (2015). Existence and stability of peri- odic solutions of a Lotka-Volterra system. Proceedings of the SICE International Symposium on Control Systems , 712–4:1–6. arXiv:1508.07128 (2015)

    2015 arXiv

  46. [55]

    V., Nguyen, L

    Ta, T. V., Nguyen, L. T. H. (eds) (2024). Proceedings of Workshop on Interdis- ciplinary Sciences 2023 - Interdisciplinary Sciences: Applied Mathematics, AI, and Statistics . Springer, Singapore

    2024

  47. [56]

    Kong, Z., Ping, W., Huang, J., Zhao, K., and Catanzaro, B., DiffWave: A versatile diffusion model for audio synthesis, arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.09761 , (2020). 19

    2009 arXiv

  48. [57]

    van den Oord, A., Dieleman, S., Zen, H., Simonyan, K., Vinyals, O., Graves, A., Kalchbrenner, N., Senior, A., and Kavukcuoglu, K., Wavenet: A generative model for raw audio, arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.03499 , (2016)

    2016 arXiv

  49. [58]

    F., Suppression of acoustic noise in speech using spectral subtraction, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing , 27(2):113–120, 1979

    Boll, S. F., Suppression of acoustic noise in speech using spectral subtraction, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing , 27(2):113–120, 1979

    1979

  50. [59]

    and Karmakar, A., Speech Enhancement using Spectral Subtraction-type Algorithms: A Comparison and Simulation Study, Procedia Computer Science, 54:574–584, (2015)

    Upadhyay, N. and Karmakar, A., Speech Enhancement using Spectral Subtraction-type Algorithms: A Comparison and Simulation Study, Procedia Computer Science, 54:574–584, (2015)

    2015

  51. [60]

    and Karmakar, A., An Improved Multi-Band Spectral Subtrac- tion Algorithm for Enhancing Speech in Various Noise Environments, Procedia Engineering, 64:312–321, (2013)

    Upadhyay, N. and Karmakar, A., An Improved Multi-Band Spectral Subtrac- tion Algorithm for Enhancing Speech in Various Noise Environments, Procedia Engineering, 64:312–321, (2013)

    2013

  52. [61]

    Iqbal, Y., Zhang, T., Geng, Y., et al., Discrete Wavelet Transform and Spectral Subtraction Based Speech Enhancement Algorithm for Hearing Aid Applica- tion, Preprint at Research Square , https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4020739/v1, (2024)

    2024 doi

  53. [62]

    Liu, Y., Xu, Z., He, Y., Guo, P., and Mu, K., Acoustic fault diagnosis method for rotating machinery based on improved spectral subtraction and CNN-TCN model, Measurement, 256:118482, (2025)

    2025

  54. [63]

    Kilgour, K., Zuluaga, M., Roblek, D., and Sharifi, M., Fr´ echet Audio Dis- tance: A Metric for Evaluating Music Enhancement Algorithms, arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.08466, (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  55. [64]

    Jr, and Matsuyama, Y., Distortion Measures for Speech Processing, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 28:367–376, (1980)

    Gray, R., Buzo, A., Gray, A. Jr, and Matsuyama, Y., Distortion Measures for Speech Processing, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 28:367–376, (1980)

    1980

  56. [65]

    Basseville, M., Distance Measures for Signal Processing and Pattern Recognition, Signal Processing, 18:349–369, (1989)

    1989

  57. [66]

    L., Pardo, J

    Men´ endez, M. L., Pardo, J. A., Pardo, L., and Pardo, M. C., The Jensen-Shannon Divergence, Journal of the Franklin Institute , 334(2):307–318, (1997)

    1997

  58. [67]

    and Weiss, Y., On GANs and GMMs, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , vol

    Richardson, E. and Weiss, Y., On GANs and GMMs, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , vol. 31, 2018

    2018

  59. [68]

    Robinson, D., Miron, M., Hagiwara, M., and Pietquin, O., NatureLM- audio: an Audio-Language Foundation Model for Bioacoustics, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.07186, (2024). 20

    2024 arXiv

  60. [69]

    Bird Data Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Bird call data , 2023, Available: https: //www.birdsdata.com

    2023

  61. [70]

    and Marro, C

    Plapous, C. and Marro, C. and Scalart, P., Improved Signal-to-Noise Ratio Esti- mation for Speech Enhancement, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 14(6):2098–2108, 2006

  62. [71]

    D., Acoustic Scene Generation with Conditional SampleRNN, Proceedings of the IEEE Inter- national Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) , pp

    Kong, Q., Xu, Y., Iqbal, T., Cao, Y., Wang, W., and Plumbley, M. D., Acoustic Scene Generation with Conditional SampleRNN, Proceedings of the IEEE Inter- national Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) , pp. 925–929, 2019

    2019

  63. [72]

    Liu, X., Iqbal, T., Zhao, J., Huang, Q., Plumbley, M. D., and Wang, W., Con- ditional sound generation using neural discrete time-frequency representation learning, Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 31st International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP) , pp. ...

    2021

  64. [73]

    Ephraim, Y. and Malah, D., Speech enhancement using a minimum-mean square error short-time spectral amplitude estimator, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 32(6):1109–1121, 1984

    1984

  65. [74]

    Ephraim, Y. and Malah, D., Speech enhancement using a minimum mean-square error log-spectral amplitude estimator, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 33(2):443–445, 1985

    1985

  66. [75]

    Lemercier, J.-M., Richter, J., Welker, S., Moliner, E., V¨ alim¨ aki, V., and Gerk- mann, T., Diffusion Models for Audio Restoration: A review, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 41(6):72–84, 2024. 21

    2024

  67. [2023]

    Springer, Singapore

    Mathematics for Industry , vol 38. Springer, Singapore

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.