Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 77 references

Unveiling Stellar Feedback and Cloud Structure in the $\rho$ Ophiuchi A Region with ALMA and JWST: Discovery of Substellar Cores, C$^{18}$O Striations, and Protostellar Outflows

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims four compact cores without infrared counterparts near VLA 1623 are gravitationally bound pre-substellar cores of 0.01–0.035 solar masses, and that stellar feedback from S1 and outflows shapes the Ophiuchus A cloud.

desk verdict The new source catalog and outflow census are worth having, but the paper's central claim that all four PSS cores have alpha_BE near unity is contradicted by its own Table 6. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.01122 v1 pith:KDRYOBTF submitted 2025-09-01 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR

Fumitaka Nakamura (NAOJ) , Ryohei Kawabe (NAOJ) , Shuo Huang (NAOJ/Nagoya Univ.) , Kazuya Saigo (Kagoshima Univ.) , Naomi Hirano (ASIAA) , Shigehisa Takakuwa (Kagoshima Univ.) , Takeshi Kamazaki (NAOJ) , Motohide Tamura (Univ. of Tokyo)
show 4 more authors
James Di Francesco (NRC) Rachel Friesen (Univ. of Toronto) Kazunari Iwasaki (NAOJ) Chihomi Hara (Univ.of Tokyo/NEC)
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR
keywords starformationsubstellarcorespre-substellarbrowndwarfsprotostellaroutflowsstellarfeedbackmolecularcloudsOphiuchusA
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper combines ALMA 1.3 mm continuum images with JWST near-infrared images of the nearest cluster-forming cloud, Ophiuchus A, to ask how stellar feedback shapes cloud structure and whether substellar-mass cores can form there. It reports seven new compact dust cores below the stellar-mass threshold. Three have infrared counterparts and are interpreted as young brown dwarfs or planetary-mass objects; four, clustered near the Class 0 protostar VLA 1623, show no infrared emission and have Bonnor-Ebert ratios near unity, suggesting they are gravitationally bound pre-substellar cores with masses 0.01–0.035 solar masses. The same data map feedback from the Herbig Be star S1: an expanding bubble, warm gas blowing out of the northern ridge, C18O striations aligned with the magnetic field, and several newly identified protostellar outflows.

What carries the argument

The Bonnor-Ebert mass ratio, α_BE = M_c/M_BE, is the central diagnostic: it compares each core’s dust-derived mass to the maximum mass of a stable, pressure-confined isothermal sphere, with α_BE ≈ 1 marking the edge of gravitational collapse. Core masses come from a dust-mass formula using the 1.3 mm flux, an assumed opacity, gas-to-dust ratio, and dust temperature. The observational pairing is ALMA 1.3 mm continuum, which traces cold dust and reveals compact cores, with JWST F470N imaging, which traces shocked H2 and scattered light and separates embedded protostars from infrared-dark prestellar candidates.

What would settle it

Measure the internal gas kinematics of PSS OphA 1–4 with a dense-gas tracer such as N2H+ or C18O at high resolution. If the line widths imply virial masses well below the dust-derived masses, or if the cores share the ambient cloud velocity rather than showing offsets expected from ejection near VLA 1623, the boundedness or ejection claim fails. Deeper, higher-resolution ALMA imaging that resolves the cores into sidelobe or spatial-filtering artifacts near VLA 1623 would also falsify them.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Ophiuchus A contains a population of compact, faint 1.3 mm dust cores with substellar masses, and that at least four of them—PSS OphA 1–4, near the triple Class 0 system VLA 1623—are likely gravitationally bound on their own. The paper derives masses of 0.01–0.035 solar masses from the millimeter fluxes assuming 20 K dust, and finds Bonnor-Ebert ratios close to unity, indicating that each core is near the critical mass for collapse. Because the cores lack point-like infrared counterparts despite JWST sensitivity that would detect a 10 Jupiter-mass object to large extinction, they are classified as pre-substellar cores. Three further cores with faint infrared emissio

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion that the four cores are bound assumes they are real, compact dust structures whose 1.3 mm emission straightforwardly measures their mass; the paper itself notes that varying the assumed dust temperature from 10 to 18 K shifts the derived masses by factors 0.61–3.64 and drives the Bonnor-Ebert ratios across 0.17–3.5, so boundedness is not robust to that assumption, and the cores sit near the bright VLA 1623 source where interferometric artifacts are a risk.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Substellar objects can begin as self-gravitating cores: if the PSS cores are bound, core formation extends below 0.08 solar masses, so the low-mass end of the stellar IMF may be set partly by core fragmentation rather than only by disk ejection.
  • Ejection from a multiple system can produce free-floating planetary-mass objects: the CO finger-like connections to VLA 1623 make this a candidate population of ejected pre-substellar cores.
  • Feedback from an intermediate-mass star can dominate the structure of a dense ridge: the S1 bubble, the blown-out northern ridge, and warm gas flowing toward GSS30 imply momentum injection comparable to the thermal pressure of cold dense gas.
  • Magnetic fields can guide feedback: the C18O striations, aligned with the field and quasi-periodic with separations of about 3000–3500 au, imply a strongly magnetized bubble where plasma beta is about 10^-2.
  • Several new protostellar outflows and jets from sources such as VLA 1623W, [GY92]21, [GY92]23, and [GY92]20 are identified, showing that protostellar feedback operates across multiple evolutionary stages in the same cluster.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the four PSS cores are real and bound, they would be among the least massive self-gravitating cores known; a direct test is to measure their dust temperatures from multi-wavelength photometry and their internal kinematics to check whether boundedness holds across the allowed temperature range.
  • The ejection interpretation implies a specific kinematic signature—cores with velocities offset from VLA 1623’s systemic velocity and from the ambient gas—that the present data cannot test, since the paper reports no C18O detection toward the cores; targeted line mapping or multi-epoch astrometry could discriminate between turbulent fragmentation and ejection.
  • The paper itself cautions that ejected cores may not survive hydrodynamical interaction with surrounding gas; if survival is difficult, the ejection scenario weakens while the bounded-core claim stands independently.
  • If the C18O striations are MHD waves in a strongly magnetized shell, the same mechanism may apply at other HII-region boundaries; comparing field strengths from Zeeman or Chandrasekhar-Fermi measurements with the observed wave-like velocity patterns would extend the result beyond this one region.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper combines ALMA 1.3 mm continuum and CO line observations with JWST NIRCam F470N imaging to study the nearby cluster-forming region Oph A. It reports the detection of seven faint compact continuum cores: three with compact infrared emission (ALMA OphA 3/4/5) and four without point-like infrared counterparts (PSS OphA 1-4). For the four PSS cores the authors estimate masses ~0.01-0.035 Msun and claim Bonnor-Ebert ratios close to unity (alpha_BE ~ 1), interpreting them as gravitationally bound pre-substellar cores, possibly ejected from the VLA1623 system. The paper also identifies several new protostellar outflows and jets, attributes a large infrared bow shock to GSS30 IRS1, and analyzes the S1 HII/PDR bubble, including C18O striations aligned with the magnetic field and quasi-periodic velocity features interpreted as possible MHD waves.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the four PSS cores would be among the lowest-mass prestellar cores found to date, with implications for the substellar IMF and for ejection vs. turbulent fragmentation scenarios. The paper makes good use of complementary ALMA/JWST data, explicitly states its detection criteria, provides an SED for ALMA OphA3, and gives detailed inventories of outflows and feedback structures. However, the key boundedness conclusion is not robust under the paper's own stated parameter ranges, and the reliability of the two faintest PSS-core detections is not quantitatively established. The observational material and the morphological/kinematic inventory are valuable, and the feedback analysis is suggestive, but the load-bearing claims need substantial revision before they can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.1.1, Table 6, Eq. (4)] The statement that 'all four cores ... have Bonnor-Ebert ratios close to unity (alpha_BE ~ 1)' is contradicted by the paper's own Table 6. The listed alpha_BE ranges are 0.25-1.9, 0.45-3.5, 0.17-1.3, and 0.43-3.3 for T=10-18 K. Extrapolating the mass scaling in Eq. (2) to the text's adopted T_d=20 K gives alpha_BE ~0.2 for PSS1 and PSS3, i.e., clearly subcritical. In addition, the M_BE column for PSS1 (16.2-20.2 in units of 1e-3 Msun) is inconsistent with Eq. (4): with R_c=97.2 au, M_BE(10 K)=6.1e-3 Msun and M_BE(18 K)=19.8e-3 Msun. The quoted alpha range 0.25-1.9 actually implies M_BE(10 K)=6.2e-3 Msun, not 16.2e-3. This internal inconsistency must be corrected, and alpha_BE should be presented with full propagation of T_d, T_g, and R_c uncertainties.
  2. [Section 4.1, Table 5] The stated core identification criterion of peak intensity exceeding 8 sigma is not met by PSS1 (2.36/0.33 ~ 7.2 sigma) or PSS3 (2.19/0.36 ~ 6.1 sigma). The 'more than two closed contours' requirement is not quantitatively demonstrated. All four PSS cores lie within about 25 arcsec of the very bright VLA1623 source, yet no deconvolution, sidelobe model, or injected-source test is presented to exclude interferometric sidelobes or PSF artifacts. Given that the central discovery claim rests on the reality of these faint sources, a specific check is needed (e.g., uv-model subtraction or a point-source injection/recovery test) before the PSS cores can be regarded as secure.
  3. [Section 4.1.1, Eq. (2) and text] The mass and boundedness estimates are not tied to a single consistent temperature. The text adopts T_d=20 K and states that varying T_d from 10 to 30 K changes the mass by factors 3.64 to 0.61, but Table 6 only tabulates T=10 and 18 K. The quoted masses (0.01-0.035 Msun) and the alpha_BE~1 conclusion are thus evaluated at different temperatures in different places, and the conclusion depends sensitively on T_d. Furthermore, the radius errors from Table 5 are not propagated; this is especially important for PSS3, whose FWHM is explicitly noted as not beam-deconvolved. Please recompute the table at a uniform adopted temperature and provide error bars on alpha_BE that include both temperature and radius uncertainties.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 4.1.2] For ALMA OphA3, the text gives an integrated intensity of 1.97 +/- 0.21 mJy and a peak of 1.9 +/- 0.12 mJy/beam, whereas Table 5 lists 4.96 +/- 0.51 mJy and 2.38 +/- 0.17 mJy/beam. The adopted envelope mass (3.53e-3 Msun) is consistent with the Table 5 value, not the text value; please correct the text to match the table.
  2. [Section 5 and Section 4.1.2] There are typos: 'feecback' in the Summary, and 'papaer' and 'complehensive' in Section 4.1.2.
  3. [Table 6] Specify the units of M_BE consistently (the header says Msun but the values appear to be in units of 1e-3 Msun for consistency with M_c), and clarify which temperature corresponds to the minimum and maximum of each column.
  4. [Section 4.1] The text says the cores show 'peak intensities exceeding 8-5 sigma', which is a range; this should be reconciled with the explicit 8-sigma criterion stated just above.
  5. [Figure 3 caption] The contour levels are given as '3, 5, 7, ... sigma', which skips even levels. Please clarify whether the insets and the wide panel follow the same contour scheme, and define the sigma value used.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; central mass/boundedness estimates are derived from observed fluxes with standard formulae, and self-citations are contextual rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is not circular. Core masses are computed from observed 1.3 mm fluxes via Eq. (2), using a standard dust opacity (Hildebrand 1983), an assumed dust temperature, and a gas-to-dust ratio; the Bonnor-Ebert ratio is then formed from Eq. (3)-(4), which are textbook relations. No parameter is fitted to the cores and then renamed as a prediction; the boundedness claim is a direct, if temperature-sensitive, consequence of the observed flux, distance, and assumed temperature. The new PSS cores are identified from the ALMA continuum image, not from any prior model. Self-citations to Kawabe et al. (2018) and Hara et al. (2021) provide coordinates, known-source classifications, and outflow context, but the discovery and mass estimates of the four new cores do not depend on those works in a way that reduces the claim to a self-citation. The paper's own Table 6 gives alpha_BE ranges 0.17-3.5 for T=10-18 K, so the text's summary 'alpha_BE ≈ 1' is fragile and internally inconsistent, but that is a correctness/robustness concern, not circularity. Overall, the derivation chain is observationally self-contained against external benchmarks, so the circularity score is 1 out of 10.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central mass and boundedness estimates depend on adopted dust/gas parameters and an isothermal model that are not independently calibrated in this paper. The IR-based prestellar classification and the magnetic alignment each depend on external measurements. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • Dust temperature Td for core masses = 20 K (with 10-18 K ranges in Table 6)
    Eq. (2) assumes Td=20 K to convert 1.3 mm flux to mass; the paper's own temperature variation changes masses by factors 0.61-3.64.
  • Gas temperature T in Bonnor-Ebert critical mass = 15 K
    Eq. (4) sets T=15K; with T ranges 10-18K, MBE changes and α_BE spans 0.17-3.5, undermining the 'close to unity' claim.
  • Magnetic field strength B for plasma beta = 0.2 mG (lower limit)
    Eq. (5) uses B=0.2 mG from Lê et al. 2024; beta=8.9e-3 depends on this adopted field value.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Dust emission is optically thin with τ<1, with κ_230GHz=0.00529 cm2/g and gas-to-dust ratio 100.
    Underlies all mass estimates in Eq. (2); if the opacity or optical depth differs, masses change.
  • standard math The Bonnor-Ebert isothermal sphere criterion applies to these compact cores.
    Used to convert mass and radius into a stability ratio α_BE; assumes pressure-confined isothermal equilibrium.
  • domain assumption Lack of point-like JWST 4.7 µm emission implies prestellar/pre-substellar nature despite AV=10-200 extinction.
    Classification of PSS cores relies on IR nondetection; high extinction can hide embedded objects, so absence is not definitive.
  • domain assumption The magnetic field orientation from 154 µm polarimetry (Lê et al. 2024) is representative at the striations' location and scale.
    Used to claim alignment and compute beta; the polarization data may have coarser resolution than the C18O striations.
  • domain assumption Line emission (12CO, C18O) traces the kinematics of the bubble and outflow without fatal self-absorption or missing flux.
    The authors note 12CO self-absorption and interferometric spatial filtering affect the maps, so bubble/outflow interpretations carry uncertainty.
  • ad hoc to paper The 8σ plus two-closed-contours criterion reliably separates real compact cores from noise and interferometric sidelobes.
    Source identification is by visual inspection with custom criteria (Section 4.1); the paper acknowledges automated algorithms are biased, but the chosen threshold is subjective.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Unveiling Stellar Feedback and Cloud Structure in the $\rho$ Ophiuchi A Region with ALMA and JWST: Discovery of Substellar Cores, C$^{18}$O Striations, and Protostellar Outflows." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KDRYOBTF

@misc{pith2026250901122,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Unveiling Stellar Feedback and Cloud Structure in the $\rho$ Ophiuchi A Region with ALMA and JWST: Discovery of Substellar Cores, C$^18$O Striations, and Protostellar Outflows},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KDRYOBTF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.01122}
}
read the original abstract

In clustered star-forming regions, stellar feedback-such as HII regions/photon-dominated regions (PDRs), and protostellar jets/outflows-shapes cloud structures and influences star formation. Using high-resolution ALMA millimeter and JWST infrared data, we analyze the cloud structure and the impact of stellar feedback in the nearest dense cluster-forming region Oph A. All 6 known Class 0/I and 2 of 6 Flat Spectrum/Class II objects are detected in the 1.3 mm dust continuum. Additionally, we newly detected 7 substellar cores, three of which show compact near-infrared emission, suggesting they are young substellar objects. The remaining cores, with masses of 0.01 Msun and high densities, are likely gravitationally bound. They appear connected by faint CO finger-like structures extending from the triple Class 0 system VLA1623-2417 Aa+Ab+B, suggesting they may have been ejected from the close binary VLA1623 Aa+Ab. 12CO and near-infrared data reveal multiple protostellar outflows. From the comparison, we identified several new outflows/jets, and shocked structures associated to the GSS30 large bipolar bubble. Strong 12CO emission traces the eastern edge of the Oph A ridge, forming part of the expanding HII/PDR bubble driven by the nearby Herbig Be star S1. The northern ridge appears blown out, with warm gas flowing toward GSS 30, injecting additional turbulent momentum. Several C18O striations in the S1 bubble align with magnetic fields, and position-velocity diagrams show wave-like patterns, possibly reflecting magnetohydrodynamic waves. Stellar feedback significantly influences Oph A's cloud structure.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.01122 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. 1.3 mm dust continuum image of Oph A, created by combining the 7-m and 12-m Array data. The grayscale bar represents intensity in Jy beam−1 . The image has been smoothed to an angular resolution of 2′′ × 2 ′′. The synthesized beam is shown as an open circle in the bottom-left corner. The positions of prestellar cores identified by Motte et al. (1998) are marked with yellow circles. Known young stellar objects (YSOs)… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Positions and close-up views of the newly detected infrared sources. The images present JWST F444W infrared emission (color scale) overlaid with 1.3 mm dust continuum contours. The central large panel shows a wide-field view with contours of the smoothed continuum image. The smaller panels display 5′′ × 5 ′′ zoomed-in views, each overlaid with contours from the original image. The synthesized beam is indicated in th… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Positions and close-up views of newly identified cores without point-like infrared emission, i.e., pre-substellar (PSS) core candidates. (a) JWST near-infrared image overlaid with 1.3 mm dust continuum contours; (b) ALMA 1.3 mm dust continuum contours overlaid on the 12CO (J = 2 − 1) integrated intensity map around VLA 1623. The smaller panels surrounding (a) and (b) display zoomed-in views of 5′′ × 5 ′′. PSS core c… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Wide-field JWST NIRCam F470N image, overlaid with the contours of the smoothed 1.3 mm continuum emission. The contours are drawn at 6, 12, 24, 60, 180, and 240 σ with 1σ = 0.45 mJy/beam. The outflows of VLA1623, [GY92]30, GSS 30, ISO-Oph 26, and [GY92]20 are indicated.…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Spectral Energy Distributions (SEDs) of sev￾eral low-mass objects. The red squares represent the SED of ALMA-OphA 3, which is compared with those of the fol￾lowing sources: the extremely young Class 0 object ALMA￾OphA 2 (open squares; adapted from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:fig…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) 12CO (J = 2–1) and (b) C18O (J = 2–1) velocity-integrated intensity images. In both panels, the gray and yellow contours are identical to those shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: 12CO channel maps around the S1-GSS30 (from the northern part of the Oph A ridge to west) region in the velocity range from 0 km s−1 to 6 km s−1 . The 1.3 mm dust continuum emission is indicated in blue contours. A dotted circle in the last panel indicates a part of th…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: 12CO and C18O integrated flux densities as a function of velocity at the east (a) and west (c) areas. The enlarged views of panels (a) and (c) are shown in panel (b) and (d). The red and blue colors represent the 12CO and C18O profiles, respectively. The areas taken ar…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: C 18O velocity channel maps (3.0 km s−1 to 3.8 km s−1 ) and striations in the S1 bubble. Contours show the 1.3 mm dust continuum emission. Some striations are indicated in the boxes in the channel maps of 3.2 km s−1 and 3.4 km s−1 where the striations are prominent (se…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (a) C18O moment-0 map with the two lines along which we took position-velocity maps, (b) and (c): C18O position￾velocity maps along the A–B and C–D lines indicated in panel (a), respectively. The two dashed lines in panel (a) highlight the prominent striations, which …
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Zoomed-in views of several protostellar outflows or candidate sources in the Oph A region. The approximate locations (northwest, west, etc.) are labeled above each panel. (a) Bipolar jet associated with [GY92] 20, traced by two solid curves in the JWST F470N image. Th…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2013, A&A, 559, A126, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322402 Andr´ e, P., Martin-Pintado, J., Despois, D., & Montmerle, T

    Alves de Oliveira, C., ´Abrah´ am, P., Marton, G., et al. 2013, A&A, 559, A126, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322402 Andr´ e, P., Martin-Pintado, J., Despois, D., & Montmerle, T. 1990, A&A, 236, 180 Andr´ e, P., Ward-Thompson, D., & Barsony, M. 1993, ApJ, 406, 122, doi: 10.1086/172425 Andr´ e, P., Ward-Thompson, D., & Greaves, J. 2012, Science, 337, 69, doi: ...

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322402 2013

  2. [2]

    2020, SSRv, 216, 76, doi: 10.1007/s11214-020-00698-3

    Ballesteros-Paredes, J., Andr´ e, P., Hennebelle, P., et al. 2020, SSRv, 216, 76, doi: 10.1007/s11214-020-00698-3

    doi:10.1007/s11214-020-00698-3 2020

  3. [3]

    2016, ARA&A, 54, 491, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023341

    Bally, J. 2016, ARA&A, 54, 491, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023341

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023341 2016

  4. [4]

    R., Federrath, C., & Seta, A

    Beattie, J. R., Federrath, C., & Seta, A. 2020, MNRAS, 498, 1593, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2257 Bern´ e, O., Marcelino, N., & Cernicharo, J. 2010, Nature, 466, 947, doi: 10.1038/nature09289 Bern´ e, O., & Matsumoto, Y. 2012, ApJL, 761, L4, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/761/1/L4

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2257 2020

  5. [5]

    A., et al

    Bontemps, S., Andr´ e, P., Kaas, A. A., et al. 2001, A&A, 372, 173, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010474

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010474 2001

  6. [6]

    L., Myers, P

    Bourke, T. L., Myers, P. C., Caselli, P., et al. 2012, ApJ, 745, 117, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/745/2/117 CASA Team, Bean, B., Bhatnagar, S., et al. 2022, PASP, 134, 114501, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/745/2/117 2012

  7. [7]

    K., & Fissel, L

    Chen, C.-Y., Li, Z.-Y., King, P. K., & Fissel, L. M. 2017, ApJ, 847, 140, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa898e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa898e 2017

  8. [8]

    P., Launhardt, R., & Henning, T

    Chen, X. P., Launhardt, R., & Henning, T. 2007, A&A, 475, 277, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066951

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066951 2007

Show all 77 references
  1. [9]

    2018, ApJ, 868, 80, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae9e4

    Chen, Y.-C., & Hirano, N. 2018, ApJ, 868, 80, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae9e4

    2018 doi

  2. [10]

    A., Gonz´ alez-Ruilova, C., Hales, A

    Cieza, L. A., Gonz´ alez-Ruilova, C., Hales, A. S., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 2934, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3787

    2021 doi

  3. [11]

    Cornwell, T. J. 2008, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2, 793, doi: 10.1109/JSTSP.2008.2006388 De Furio, M., Meyer, M. R., Greene, T., et al. 2025, ApJL, 981, L34, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adb96a Di Francesco, J., Andr´ e, P., & Myers, P. C. 2004, ApJ, 617, ...

    2008

  4. [12]

    Elias, J. H. 1978, ApJ, 224, 453, doi: 10.1086/156393

    1978 doi

  5. [13]

    G., & Lada, C

    Elmegreen, B. G., & Lada, C. J. 1977, ApJ, 214, 725, doi: 10.1086/155302

    1977 doi

  6. [14]

    M., Jørgensen, J

    Evans, Neal J., I., Dunham, M. M., Jørgensen, J. K., et al. 2009, ApJS, 181, 321, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/181/2/321

    2009 doi

  7. [15]

    R., Arce, H

    Feddersen, J. R., Arce, H. G., Kong, S., Ossenkopf-Okada, V., & Carpenter, J. M. 2019, ApJ, 875, 162, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0e7d

    2019 doi

  8. [16]

    K., Bourke, T

    Friesen, R. K., Bourke, T. L., Caselli, P., et al. 2024, ApJ, 965, 165, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2857

    2024 doi

  9. [17]

    K., Di Francesco, J., Bourke, T

    Friesen, R. K., Di Francesco, J., Bourke, T. L., et al. 2014, ApJ, 797, 27, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/797/1/27

    2014 doi

  10. [18]

    2010, ApJ, 708, 1002, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/708/2/1002

    Takakuwa, S. 2010, ApJ, 708, 1002, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/708/2/1002

    2010 doi

  11. [19]

    K., Pon, A., Bourke, T

    Friesen, R. K., Pon, A., Bourke, T. L., et al. 2018, ApJ, 869, 158, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaeff5 Gaia Collaboration, Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629272 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2023, ...

    2018 doi

  12. [20]

    L., Strom, K

    Grasdalen, G. L., Strom, K. M., & Strom, S. E. 1973, ApJL, 184, L53, doi: 10.1086/181287

    1973 doi

  13. [21]

    P., & Young, E

    Greene, T. P., & Young, E. T. 1992, ApJ, 395, 516, doi: 10.1086/171672 Guti´ errez Albarr´ an, M. L., Montes, D., G´ omez Garrido, M., et al. 2020, A&A, 643, A71, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037620

    1992 doi

  14. [22]

    2021, ApJ, 912, 34, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb810

    Hara, C., Kawabe, R., Nakamura, F., et al. 2021, ApJ, 912, 34, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb810

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    J., Cox, E

    Harris, R. J., Cox, E. G., Looney, L. W., et al. 2018, ApJ, 861, 91, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac6ec

    2018 doi

  16. [24]

    2015, A&A, 575, A110, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425498

    Hendrix, T., Keppens, R., & Camps, P. 2015, A&A, 575, A110, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425498

    2015 doi

  17. [25]

    F., Yıldız, U

    Heyer, M., Goldsmith, P. F., Yıldız, U. A., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 461, 3918, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1567

    2016 doi

  18. [26]

    2008, ApJ, 680, 420, doi: 10.1086/587510

    Heyer, M., Gong, H., Ostriker, E., & Brunt, C. 2008, ApJ, 680, 420, doi: 10.1086/587510

    2008 doi

  19. [27]

    Hildebrand, R. H. 1983, QJRAS, 24, 267

    1983

  20. [28]

    J., & Tielens, A

    Hollenbach, D. J., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 1999, Reviews of Modern Physics, 71, 173, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.71.173

    1999 doi

  21. [29]

    2013, A&A, 558, L7, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322432

    Joergens, V., Bonnefoy, M., Liu, Y., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, L7, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322432

    2013 doi

  22. [30]

    2001, ApJ, 548, 278, doi: 10.1086/318668

    Kamazaki, T., Saito, M., Hirano, N., & Kawabe, R. 2001, ApJ, 548, 278, doi: 10.1086/318668

    2001 doi

  23. [31]

    2003, ApJ, 584, 357, doi: 10.1086/345659

    Kawabe, R. 2003, ApJ, 584, 357, doi: 10.1086/345659

    2003 doi

  24. [32]

    2019, ApJ, 871, 86, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf857

    Kamazaki, T., Nakamura, F., Kawabe, R., et al. 2019, ApJ, 871, 86, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf857

    2019 doi

  25. [33]

    2018, ApJ, 866, 141, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae153 23

    Kawabe, R., Hara, C., Nakamura, F., et al. 2018, ApJ, 866, 141, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae153 23

    2018 doi

  26. [34]

    D., & Stanke, T

    Khanzadyan, T., Gredel, R., Smith, M. D., & Stanke, T. 2004, A&A, 426, 171, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041241

    2004 doi

  27. [35]

    M., Di Francesco, J., et al

    Kirk, H., Dunham, M. M., Di Francesco, J., et al. 2017, ApJ, 838, 114, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa63f8

    2017 doi

  28. [36]

    E., Godard, B., Guillard, P., Gusdorf, A., & Pineau des Forˆ ets, G

    Kristensen, L. E., Godard, B., Guillard, P., Gusdorf, A., & Pineau des Forˆ ets, G. 2023, A&A, 675, A86, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346254

    2023 doi

  29. [37]

    R., Bate, M

    Krumholz, M. R., Bate, M. R., Arce, H. G., et al. 2014, Protostars and Planets VI, 243, doi: 10.2458/azu uapress 9780816531240-ch011

    2014 doi

  30. [38]

    H., et al

    Kwon, J., Tamura, M., Hough, J. H., et al. 2015, ApJS, 220, 17, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/17

    2015 doi

  31. [39]

    2018, ApJ, 859, 4, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabd82

    Kwon, J., Doi, Y., Tamura, M., et al. 2018, ApJ, 859, 4, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabd82

    2018 doi

  32. [40]

    J., & Lada, E

    Lada, C. J., & Lada, E. A. 2003, ARA&A, 41, 57, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094844

    2003 arXiv

  33. [41]

    2020, A&A, 638, A74, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936442 Lˆ e, N., Tram, L

    Ladjelate, B., Andr´ e, P., K¨ onyves, V., et al. 2020, A&A, 638, A74, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936442 Lˆ e, N., Tram, L. N., Karska, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, A191, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348008

    2020 doi

  34. [42]

    A., Feigelson, E

    Leous, J. A., Feigelson, E. D., Andre, P., & Montmerle, T. 1991, ApJ, 379, 683, doi: 10.1086/170542

    1991 doi

  35. [43]

    2006, ApJL, 640, L187, doi: 10.1086/503419

    Li, Z.-Y., & Nakamura, F. 2006, ApJL, 640, L187, doi: 10.1086/503419

    2006 doi

  36. [44]

    J., & Alves, J

    Lombardi, M., Lada, C. J., & Alves, J. 2008, A&A, 480, 785, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20079110

    2008 doi

  37. [45]

    B., & Wootten, A

    Loren, R. B., & Wootten, A. 1986, ApJ, 306, 142, doi: 10.1086/164327 Mac Low, M.-M., & Klessen, R. S. 2004, Reviews of Modern Physics, 76, 125, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.76.125

    1986 doi

  38. [46]

    2010, ApJ, 714, 680, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/714/1/680

    Kitamura, Y. 2010, ApJ, 714, 680, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/714/1/680

    2010 doi

  39. [47]

    Matzner, C. D. 2007, ApJ, 659, 1394, doi: 10.1086/512361

    2007 doi

  40. [48]

    D., & McKee, C

    Matzner, C. D., & McKee, C. F. 2000, ApJ, 545, 364, doi: 10.1086/317785

    2000 doi

  41. [49]

    F., & Ostriker, E

    McKee, C. F., & Ostriker, E. C. 2007, ARA&A, 45, 565, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110602

    2007 arXiv

  42. [50]

    2023, MNRAS, 522, 2384, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad964

    Mercimek, S., Podio, L., Codella, C., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 2384, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad964

    2023 doi

  43. [51]

    S., et al

    Mookerjea, B., Sandell, G., Veena, V. S., et al. 2021, A&A, 648, A40, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202040217

    2021 doi

  44. [52]

    1998, A&A, 336, 150

    Motte, F., Andre, P., & Neri, R. 1998, A&A, 336, 150

    1998

  45. [53]

    Dishoeck, E. F. 2013, A&A, 560, A103, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322537

    2013 doi

  46. [54]

    2007, ApJ, 662, 395, doi: 10.1086/517515 —

    Nakamura, F., & Li, Z.-Y. 2007, ApJ, 662, 395, doi: 10.1086/517515 —. 2011, ApJ, 740, 36, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/740/1/36 —. 2014, ApJ, 783, 115, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/783/2/115

    2007 doi

  47. [55]

    2012, ApJL, 758, L25, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/758/2/L25

    Nakamura, F., Takakuwa, S., & Kawabe, R. 2012, ApJL, 758, L25, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/758/2/L25

    2012 doi

  48. [56]

    2011, ApJ, 726, 46, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/726/1/46

    Nakamura, F., Kamada, Y., Kamazaki, T., et al. 2011, ApJ, 726, 46, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/726/1/46

    2011 doi

  49. [57]

    2002, A&A, 393, 597, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021065

    Natta, A., Testi, L., Comer´ on, F., et al. 2002, A&A, 393, 597, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021065

    2002 doi

  50. [58]

    Offner, S. S. R., & Chaban, J. 2017, ApJ, 847, 104, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8996

    2017 doi

  51. [59]

    2022, ApJ, 927, 54, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4cae Ord´ o˜ nez-Toro, J., Dzib, S

    Ohashi, S., Codella, C., Sakai, N., et al. 2022, ApJ, 927, 54, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4cae Ord´ o˜ nez-Toro, J., Dzib, S. A., Loinard, L., et al. 2024, AJ, 167, 108, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad1bd3 Ortiz-Le´ on, G. N., Loinard, L., Kounkel, M. A., et al. 2017, ApJ, 834, 141, d...

    2022 doi

  52. [60]

    M., Barrientes, J., Blome, C., et al

    Pontoppidan, K. M., Barrientes, J., Blome, C., et al. 2022, ApJL, 936, L14, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac8a4e

    2022 doi

  53. [61]

    P., McCaughrean, M

    Ray, T. P., McCaughrean, M. J., Caratti o Garatti, A., et al. 2023, Nature, 622, 48, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06551-1

    2023 doi

  54. [62]

    2001, AJ, 122, 432, doi: 10.1086/321121

    Reipurth, B., & Clarke, C. 2001, AJ, 122, 432, doi: 10.1086/321121

    2001 doi

  55. [63]

    Goodman, A. A. 2008, ApJ, 679, 1338, doi: 10.1086/587685 Santamar ´ ıa-Miranda, A., de Gregorio-Monsalvo, I., Ohashi, N., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, A46, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449981

    2008 doi

  56. [64]

    2023, A&A, 673, A76, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202345880

    Skalidis, R., Gkimisi, K., Tassis, K., et al. 2023, A&A, 673, A76, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202345880

    2023 doi

  57. [65]

    R., et al

    Tamura, M., Gatley, I., Joyce, R. R., et al. 1991, ApJ, 378, 611, doi: 10.1086/170462

    1991 doi

  58. [66]

    2016, MNRAS, 462, 3602, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1881

    Tritsis, A., & Tassis, K. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 3602, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1881

    2016 doi

  59. [67]

    I., & Basu, S

    Vorobyov, E. I., & Basu, S. 2010, ApJ, 719, 1896, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/719/2/1896

    2010 doi

  60. [68]

    J., Strom, K

    Vrba, F. J., Strom, K. M., Strom, S. E., & Grasdalen, G. L. 1975, ApJ, 197, 77, doi: 10.1086/153489

    1975 doi

  61. [69]

    2010, ApJ, 709, 27, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/709/1/27

    Wang, P., Li, Z.-Y., Abel, T., & Nakamura, F. 2010, ApJ, 709, 27, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/709/1/27

    2010 doi

  62. [70]

    J., Drabek-Maunder, E., Rosolowsky, E., et al

    White, G. J., Drabek-Maunder, E., Rosolowsky, E., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 447, 1996, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2323

    2015 doi

  63. [71]

    A., Gagn´ e, M., & Allen, L

    Wilking, B. A., Gagn´ e, M., & Allen, L. E. 2008, in Handbook of Star Forming Regions, Volume II, ed. B. Reipurth, Vol. 5, 351, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.0811.0005

    2008 doi arXiv

  64. [72]

    2019, ApJ, 878, 157, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab21be

    Xu, S., Ji, S., & Lazarian, A. 2019, ApJ, 878, 157, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab21be

    2019 doi

  65. [73]

    2021, ApJL, 914, L9, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac0250

    Yamagishi, M., Shimajiri, Y., Tokuda, K., et al. 2021, ApJL, 914, L9, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac0250

    2021 doi

  66. [74]

    2019, ApJ, 875, 62, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0d80 24

    Yamagishi, M., Hara, C., Kawabe, R., et al. 2019, ApJ, 875, 62, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0d80 24

    2019 doi

  67. [75]

    2009, AJ, 138, 1830, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/138/6/1830

    Zhang, M., & Wang, H. 2009, AJ, 138, 1830, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/138/6/1830

    2009 doi

  68. [76]

    2013, A&A, 553, A41, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220342

    Zhang, M., Brandner, W., Wang, H., et al. 2013, A&A, 553, A41, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220342

    2013 doi

  69. [77]

    S., Schlafly, E

    Zucker, C., Speagle, J. S., Schlafly, E. F., et al. 2020, A&A, 633, A51, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936145

    2020 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.