Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Reconstructing flows from the orbit space

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A group action on a bifoliated plane that is properly discontinuous and cocompact on the positive-leaf space W_1^> is exactly the orbit-space action of a topological Anosov flow on a compact 3-manifold.

desk verdict The nonsingular reconstruction theorem is a real result and the W^>_1 idea is a keeper; the singular prong case has a genuine gap that needs fixing before I'd trust Theorem 1.4. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.01594 v2 pith:RW6YK4WB submitted 2025-09-01 math.DS math.GT

Thomas Barthelmé , Sergio Fenley , Kathryn Mann This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DSmath.GT MSC 37D2037D1057R30
keywords bifoliatedplanepseudo-AnosovfloworbitspaceAnosovexpansive3-manifoldgrouploomproperlydiscontinuousaction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves the converse of the standard construction that takes a pseudo-Anosov flow on a 3-manifold and produces an action of its fundamental group on a bifoliated plane, the flow's orbit space. It shows that if a torsion-free group acts on a bifoliated plane preserving the positive side of the first foliation, and the action is properly discontinuous and cocompact on the space W_1^> of pairs (x,y) with y on the positive part of the F1-leaf through x, then the quotient W_1^>/G is a compact 3-manifold carrying a topological Anosov flow whose orbit space is the original plane and whose induced fundamental-group action is the given one. The same constructive machinery yields a new proof that the orbit-space action determines an Anosov flow up to orbit equivalence, and, for non-cocompact actions, produces expansive flows on possibly noncompact 3-manifolds. As an application, automorphism groups of loom spaces, bifoliated planes associated to veering triangulations, are shown to be 3-manifold groups with expansive flows.

What carries the argument

The space W_1^> (Definition 1.1): the set of pairs (x,t) with t on the positive side of the F1-leaf through x. It is homeomorphic to R^3, its constant-first-coordinate foliation is the prospective flow, and the quotient by a properly discontinuous group action is the 3-manifold. The proofs also rely on the closing property and uniform hyperbolicity of fixed points (Definitions 1.8 and 1.9), which are checkable conditions ensuring the action on W_1^> is free and properly discontinuous.

What would settle it

Construct a bifoliated plane with a 2-prong singularity whose stabilizer is cyclic but for which no equivariant identification of the two prong rays exists; then Definition 5.1 fails and the quotient cannot be a 3-manifold, contradicting Theorem 1.4. Alternatively, find an action satisfying the hypotheses of Theorem 1.3 whose quotient W_1^>/G is not homeomorphic to a 3-manifold, such as one developing an orbifold point, which would falsify the reconstruction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the space W_1^> = {(x,t) in P×P : t in F_1^>(x)} is a universal model for the flow: it is homeomorphic to R^3, the diagonal group action descends to a 3-manifold M = W_1^>/G, and the constant-first-coordinate foliation becomes the orbit foliation of a flow on M whose orbit space is (P,F_1,F_2) with the induced action equal to G. Thus any properly discontinuous, cocompact, orientation-preserving group action on a bifoliated plane without infinite product regions is rigidly realized by a topological Anosov flow, with the singular (prong) case handled by identifying prong rays equivariantly to form the space W_1^*. The paper also establishes the converse direction, clo

Load-bearing premise

In the singular case, the construction of W_1^* requires choosing, for each prong singularity, equivariant identifications of the prong rays that commute with the stabilizer of the singularity; the paper asserts such identifications exist on a fundamental domain and can be extended equivariantly, but gives no proof, and a failure for some cyclic stabilizer would make W_1^* ill-defined and break Theorem 1.4.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any torsion-free group satisfying the hypotheses is a 3-manifold group, so the theorem produces new 3-manifold groups from plane actions.
  • The orbit-space action determines the flow up to orbit equivalence, giving a constructive proof of a classical result without orientability assumptions.
  • For non-cocompact actions, the same construction yields expansive flows preserving two transverse foliations, extending the theory to noncompact 3-manifolds.
  • In the loom-space application, automorphism groups of loom spaces are shown to carry expansive flows, giving a flow-theoretic route from veering triangulations to 3-manifolds.
  • The result generalizes the extended convergence group picture from skew Anosov flows to all transversally orientable pseudo-Anosov flows.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The reconstruction is canonical enough that W_1^> could serve as a universal model for transversally orientable flows; one might expect extensions to bifoliated planes with infinite product regions by excising them, yielding flows with suspension-like behavior.
  • The closing property and uniform hyperbolicity are purely dynamical conditions on the plane; they may be verifiable for other classes of group actions, such as actions on universal circles or on circle bundles, producing new expansive flows.
  • The proof suggests a dictionary: a leafwise orientation of F1 corresponds to a choice of 'future' in the flow; the nonorientable case requires leafwise metric involutions, indicating that W_1^> is the natural model only in the orientable case and that a doubled space is needed otherwise.
  • Since the construction uses only topology and an adapted metric, it is plausible that the results hold for topological Anosov flows without any smooth structure, which the paper already assumes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper gives conditions under which a group action on a bifoliated plane is realized as the induced action of a pseudo-Anosov flow on its orbit space. The main nonsingular result (Theorem 1.3) says that if a torsion-free G < Aut_1^+(P) acts properly discontinuously and cocompactly on W_1^> = {(x,t) : t ∈ F_1^>(x)}, then W_1^>/G is a compact 3-manifold carrying a topological Anosov flow with orbit space P and induced action G. A singular version (Theorem 1.4) replaces W_1^> by a quotient W_1^* in which prong rays are identified, assuming cyclic prong stabilizers. The paper also proves a converse (Theorem 1.7), a new proof of Barbot's theorem that orbit-space actions determine Anosov flows up to orbit equivalence (Section 2), criteria for proper discontinuity via closing and hyperbolic fixed-point properties (Theorems 1.10 and 1.12), and an application to automorphism groups of loom spaces (Theorem 1.13), recovering an expansive flow.

Significance. The nonsingular reconstruction is an appealing and largely elementary construction: the space W_1^> is a natural model of the universal cover of the would-be flow, and the proof that the constant-first-coordinate foliation gives an expansive flow is coherent modulo the leaf-properness point noted below. The constructive proof of Barbot's theorem is a genuine simplification. The loom-space application is a nice illustration of the framework and gives a new route to expansive flows. The paper is transparent about overlap with [BWZ24] and [BJK25]. The singular case, however, rests on an unproved equivariant identification of prongs; this is load-bearing for Theorem 1.4 and the singular versions of the other results.

major comments (2)
  1. [Definition 5.1 and preceding paragraph] The claim that the identifications σ_j^p can be 'defined arbitrarily on a fundamental domain for the (cyclic) stabilizer of r_1 and then extended equivariantly' does not produce the needed G-invariance of W_1^*. The displayed equivariance condition only covers elements of Stab_G(p) fixing all rays. If the cyclic stabilizer is generated by an element h that permutes the prongs, e.g. h(r_1)=r_2, then for Y={y,σ_2(y),...} the image hY={h(y), hσ_2(y), ...} must again be a set {y',σ_2(y'),...} for some y'∈r_1. This imposes functional equations (e.g. involving σ_2 h σ_2 and h) that are not consequences of the displayed condition. The fundamental-domain sentence does not address h-translates because h does not preserve r_1 setwise. Since W_1^* and its G-action are the foundation of Theorem 1.4, this gap must be repaired, either by proving existence of equivariant σ_j or by defining W_1^* as a q
  2. [Proposition 3.6, first paragraph] The assertion 'In any (bi)-foliated plane, all leaves are necessarily properly embedded' is stated without proof or reference. It is used immediately to conclude that y_t leaves every compact set as t→∞, which is essential for the flow-box argument that x=z. In general foliations of the plane leaves need not be properly embedded (Reeb-type spiraling leaves), and it is not evident that the transverse foliation or the no-infinite-product-region hypothesis rules this out. Please provide a proof/reference, or modify the argument so that it does not rely on this assertion.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Title] The title contains a typo: 'ORBIT SP ACE' should be 'ORBIT SPACE'.
  2. [Lemma 4.13 and Section 5] Lemma 4.13 is stated for G < Aut^+(P), but it is invoked in Section 5 in contexts where only G < Aut_1^+(P) is assumed. Either state a version for Aut_1^+(P) or explain why the proof carries over verbatim.
  3. [Section 3, metric construction] The symbol δ_0 is first used for the Lebesgue number of d_0 and then reused after the metric d is constructed. Rename one of the two quantities to avoid confusion.
  4. [Definition 5.1] The notation W_1^* ⊂ P × 2^P is somewhat unusual; the second factor is the set of subsets of P of the form {y, σ_2(y), ...}. Consider writing the definition in words or introducing a symbol for the relevant family of finite subsets.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the reconstruction is a genuine construction and cited self-results are auxiliary standard lemmas.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a construction, not a repackaging of its hypotheses. In Theorem 1.3, M = W>_1/G is a 3-manifold and the orbit-space identification is by construction, but the substantive conclusion that the canonical first-coordinate foliation is expansive is proved in Proposition 3.6 from the absence of F_1-infinite product regions and the good-neighborhood geometry; it is not assumed. The proof of Barbot's theorem (Section 2) is an independent reconstruction: h: W>_s -> \tilde M is defined from a strong stable foliation and adapted metric, and W>_s/pi_1(M) is homeomorphic to M is derived, not posited. The cited results [BFP23, Pot25] supply existence of strong stable foliations, a standard tool, and the paper explicitly notes and corrects the error in [BFP23], so the citation is not hiding the target conclusion. Theorem 1.10 (closing + uniform hyperbolicity => proper discontinuity) is proved from dynamics on P, and Theorem 1.7 verifies these hypotheses from the pseudo-Anosov closing lemma and periodic-orbit length growth; this is a check of hypotheses against standard flow theory, not an assumption of the conclusion. The loom-space application credits [BJK25] for the known 3-manifold-group fact and gives standalone proofs; the new expansive-flow statement is derived from the main theorems. The only flagged issue, the equivariant prong identifications in Definition 5.1, is a possible correctness gap in the singular construction, not a circular reduction: no theorem or definition in the paper forces W*_1 to be defined in terms of the flow it is meant to produce. Thus no circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities or fitted constants. The main new objects are the spaces W^>_1 and W^*_1, which are defined constructs rather than postulated entities. The central load-bearing assumptions are background theorems in the theory of pseudo-Anosov flows, several cited to unpublished or recently corrected sources.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption All leaves of a bifoliated plane are properly embedded
    Used in Proposition 3.6 to assert y_t leaves all compact sets; no proof given in the paper.
  • domain assumption Pseudo-Anosov flows have orbit spaces that are bifoliated planes as described
    Cited to [Bar95], [Fen94], [FM01] as background; the whole framework relies on it.
  • domain assumption Pseudo-Anosov closing lemma for orbit space actions
    Cited to [BM25, Prop 1.4.7], an in-preparation manuscript by two of the authors; used to verify the closing property in Theorem 1.7 and the remark after Definition 1.8.
  • domain assumption For any topological Anosov flow there is an orbit-equivalent flow with strong stable distribution and adapted metric
    Proposition 2.4 cites [BFP23, Cor 5.23] and [Pot25, Prop 5.3]; the paper notes [BFP23] has an error corrected by [Pot25].
  • ad hoc to paper Equivariant prong identification homeomorphisms sigma_j^p can be defined for cyclic point stabilizers
    Stated in Section 5 before Definition 5.1, asserted to be defined on a fundamental domain and extended equivariantly; no proof given.
  • domain assumption Expansive flows without fixed points on compact 3-manifolds are pseudo-Anosov
    Cited to [IM90] and [Pat93] to upgrade Theorem 1.3 from expansive to pseudo-Anosov.
  • standard math Candel's uniformization gives leafwise hyperbolic metrics on universal covers of Anosov foliations
    Used in Section 2.1 to define reflections i_gamma for the non-orientable case; cited to [CC00].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Reconstructing flows from the orbit space." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RW6YK4WB

@misc{pith2026250901594,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Reconstructing flows from the orbit space},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RW6YK4WB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.01594}
}
read the original abstract

We give some simple conditions under which a group acting on a bifoliated plane comes from the induced action of a pseudo-Anosov flow on its orbit space. An application of the strategy is a less technical proof of a result of Barbot that the induced action of an Anosov flow on its orbit space uniquely determines the flow up to orbit equivalence. In another application, we recover an expansive flow on a 3-manifold from the action of a group on a \emph{loom space} as defined by Schleimer and Segerman.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.01594 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A good neighborhood; F1 is the horizontal foliation; the orien￾tation of leaves is from left to right goal is to build a good metric. Of course, when M is assumed to be compact, this step is unnecessary. The key is to build a metric d which admits a constant 0 < δ such that any ball of size δ in M is contained in the projection of a good neighborhood of W > 1 . Fix a countable, locally finite, cover U of M by relati… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. If yt is close to x, then (x, yt) cannot share a good neighborhood with (z, wt) Thus, we have that z ∈ F2(x). Next, we want to deduce that z = x. Suppose for a contradiction that x ̸= z. In particular F1(z) ̸= F1(x). Now pick any point u in the F2- segment between x and z. By construction, the orbits φ t (p) and φ τ(t) (q) in M corresponding to the projections of (x, yt) and (z, wt) are in the same flow box, and one… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. If x and z are on the same F2-leaf, their orbits cannot stay forever in the same flow box. Therefore we deduce that x = z, which shows that p, q lie on the same local orbit of the flow. Since orbits of φe are properly embedded by construction, we deduce that φ satisfies Definition 3.2. □ With this we can easily finish the proof of Theorems 1.3 and 1.5. By construction, since Mf = W> 1 and the foliation by orbits is … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The good neighborhoods in the singular case The proofs of Theorems 1.4 and 1.5 now follows exactly the proof of Theorem 1.3 (and the nonsingular case of Theorem 1.5) done in Section 3. Lemma 3.1 remains unchanged, and W∗ 1 /G is now a 3-manifold with a singular foliati…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: F > 1 (u) cannot contain a prong singularity • Each nonsingular point x ∈ P has a neighborhood basis Ui in P, with the property that for each Ui there is a smaller neighborhood Vi ⊂ Ui such that, if g(Vi) ∩ Vi ̸= ∅, then g has a fixed point in Ui. • Each singular point…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: A tetrahedron rectangle for some 3-manifold M and W> 1 /G ∼= M admits an expansive flow whose orbit space is (P, F1, F2). Moreover, M is “atoroidal”, in the sense that any Z 2 subgroup of π1(M) fixes a unique cusp. When G is finitely generated we prove the stronger fac…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The two cases, up to symmetry, for the boundary of F2(r) ∩ F2(r ′ ). We will show in Proposition 6.6 that any non-trivial element of g admits at most one fixed point in the plane. In preparation for this, we first show the following: Lemma 6.5. Let (P, F1, F2) be a loo…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: A second fixed point of g. Now we show the second direction. Suppose that g fixes two distinct points x, y on a common leaf, without loss of generality in F1. If one of F2(x) or F2(y) makes a perfect fit, there is nothing to prove. So we assume that neither makes perfe…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Obtaining a fixed point z for g between x and y Since the set of fixed points of any element is closed, the above argument shows that for any leaf l ′ of either foliation, the set fix(g) ∩ l ′ is a closed (possibly empty or degenerate) interval, and we have assumed at …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Fixed points are hyperbolic Since there are only countably many leaves that are nonseparated with other leaves, and a leaf is nonseparated with another leaf if and only if it admits a perfect fit, there exists some leaf l2 intersecting r1 that does not make any perfec…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The possible intersections of R with gR: Markovian at left, weakly Markovian at center and diagonal at right. any side contains a cusp point), this forces F1(gR) ⊃ F1(R). Again, since interiors of rectangles have no cusps, there are exactly two possibilities for the i…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Diagonal intersection patterns for the two types of tetrahe￾drons. Lemma 6.12. Let x ∈ P. There exists V a tetrahedron rectangle containing x and such that three of the four cusps are on one side of F1(x). Moreover, we can choose V such that V ∩ F1(x) is as small as w…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The two possible configurations when building H. Using again condition (i) of a loom space, the leaf l ′ 1 is nonseparated with a leaf l ′′ 1 . Repeat the above construction taking a leaf f1 of F1 (distinct form F1(x)) that intersects I on the opposite side of x to l1…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From Markovian actions to Anosov flows

    math.DS 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Orientation-preserving strong Markovian actions on bifoliated planes are exactly the actions arising from topological Anosov flows on closed orientable 3-manifolds.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Agol, Ideal triangulations of pseudo- A nosov mapping tori , Topology and geometry in dimension three, Contemp

    I. Agol, Ideal triangulations of pseudo- A nosov mapping tori , Topology and geometry in dimension three, Contemp. Math., vol. 560, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2011, pp. 1--17

    work page 2011

  2. [2]

    Agol and C

    I. Agol and C. C. Tsang, Dynamics of veering triangulations: infinitesimal components of their flow graphs and applications, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Barbot, Caract\'erisation des flots d' A nosov en dimension 3 par leurs feuilletages faibles , Ergodic Theory Dynam

    T. Barbot, Caract\'erisation des flots d' A nosov en dimension 3 par leurs feuilletages faibles , Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 15 (1995), no. 2, 247--270

    work page 1995

  4. [4]

    , Actions de groupes sur les 1-vari\' e t\' e s non s\' e par\' e es et feuilletages de codimension un , Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. (6) 7 (1998), no. 4, 559--597

    work page 1998

  5. [5]

    Barthelm \'e , S

    T. Barthelm \'e , S. Fenley, and R. Potrie, Collapsed Anosov flows and self orbit equivalences , Comment. Math. Helv. 98 (2023), no. 4, 771--875 (English)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    H. Baik, H. Jung, and K. Kim, Groups acting on veering pairs and K leinian groups , J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 111 (2025), no. 1, Paper No. e70052, 90

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Barthelmé and K

    T. Barthelmé and K. Mann, Pseudo- A nosov flows: a plane approach , 2025, In preparation. Preliminary version available at https://sites.google.com/site/thomasbarthelme/research

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Bonahon, Geometric structures on 3-manifolds, Handbook of geometric topology, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2002, pp

    F. Bonahon, Geometric structures on 3-manifolds, Handbook of geometric topology, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2002, pp. 93--164

    work page 2002

Show all 32 references
  1. [9]

    Bonahon and L

    F. Bonahon and L. C. Siebenmann, The characteristic toric splitting of irreducible compact 3 -orbifolds , Math. Ann. 278 (1987), no. 1-4, 441--479

    1987

  2. [10]

    Bowen and P

    R. Bowen and P. Walters, Expansive one-parameter flows, J. Differential Equations 12 (1972), 180--193

    1972

  3. [11]

    H. Baik, C. Wu, and B. Zhao, Reconstruction of A nosov flows from infinity , preprint (2024), arXiv:2407.07634 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2407.07634

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Candel and L

    A. Candel and L. Conlon, Foliations. I , Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 23, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2000

    2000

  5. [13]

    Fenley, Anosov flows in 3 -manifolds , Ann

    S. Fenley, Anosov flows in 3 -manifolds , Ann. of Math. (2) 139 (1994), no. 1, 79--115

    1994

  6. [14]

    , The structure of branching in A nosov flows of 3 -manifolds , Comment. Math. Helv. 73 (1998), no. 2, 259--297

    1998

  7. [15]

    Fisher and B

    T. Fisher and B. Hasselblatt, Hyperbolic flows, Zurich Lectures in Advanced Mathematics, 2019

    2019

  8. [16]

    Fenley and L

    S. Fenley and L. Mosher, Quasigeodesic flows in hyperbolic 3-manifolds, Topology 40 (2001), no. 3, 503--537

    2001

  9. [17]

    Frankel, S

    S. Frankel, S. Schleimer, and H. Segerman, From veering triangulations to link spaces and back again, 2025, arXiv:1911.00006 https://arxiv.org/pdf/1911.00006

    2025 arXiv

  10. [18]

    F. W. Gehring and G. J. Martin, Discrete quasiconformal groups, i., Proc. London Math. Soc. 55 (1987)

    1987

  11. [19]

    Gu \'e ritaud, Veering triangulations and C annon- T hurston maps , J

    F. Gu \'e ritaud, Veering triangulations and C annon- T hurston maps , J. Topol. 9 (2016), no. 3, 957--983

    2016

  12. [20]

    Haefliger, Groupo \" des d'holonomie et classifiants , Structure transverse des feuilletages, Toulouse 1982, Ast \'e risque 116, 70-97 (1984)., 1984

    A. Haefliger, Groupo \" des d'holonomie et classifiants , Structure transverse des feuilletages, Toulouse 1982, Ast \'e risque 116, 70-97 (1984)., 1984

    1982

  13. [21]

    Iakovoglou, A new combinatorial invariant characterizing A nosov flows on 3-manifolds , 2022, arXiv:2212.13177 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2212.13177

    I. Iakovoglou, A new combinatorial invariant characterizing A nosov flows on 3-manifolds , 2022, arXiv:2212.13177 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2212.13177

    2022 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Inaba and S

    T. Inaba and S. Matsumoto, Nonsingular expansive flows on 3 -manifolds and foliations with circle prong singularities , Japan. J. Math. (N.S.) 16 (1990), no. 2, 329--340

    1990

  15. [23]

    W. Jung, N. Nguyen, and Y. Yang, Spectral decomposition for rescaling expansive flows with rescaled shadowing, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 40 (2020), no. 4, 2267--2283

    2020

  16. [24]

    Kapovich, A note on properly discontinuous actions, S\ ao Paulo J

    M. Kapovich, A note on properly discontinuous actions, S\ ao Paulo J. Math. Sci. 18 (2024), no. 2, 807--836

    2024

  17. [25]

    Landry, Y

    M. Landry, Y. Minsky, and S. Taylor, Flows, growth rates, and the veering polynomial, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 43 (2023), no. 9, 3026--3107

    2023

  18. [26]

    Navas, Groups of circle diffeomorphisms, spanish ed., Chicago Lectures in Mathematics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 2011

    A. Navas, Groups of circle diffeomorphisms, spanish ed., Chicago Lectures in Mathematics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 2011

    2011

  19. [27]

    Paternain, Expansive flows and the fundamental groups, Bol

    M. Paternain, Expansive flows and the fundamental groups, Bol. Soc. Bras. Mat., Nova S \'e r. 24 (1993), no. 2, 179--199 (English)

    1993

  20. [28]

    Potrie, Anosov flows in dimension 3: an outside look, J

    R. Potrie, Anosov flows in dimension 3: an outside look, J. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 27 (2025), no. 1, 47, Id/No 21

    2025

  21. [29]

    Schleimer and H

    S. Schleimer and H. Segerman, From veering triangulations to dynamic pairs, Preprint, arXiv :2305.08799 [math. GT ] (2023), 2023

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    , From loom spaces to veering triangulations, Groups Geom. Dyn. 18 (2024), no. 2, 419--462

    2024

  23. [31]

    Thurston, 3-manifolds, foliations and circles I , math/9712268v1 [math.GT] https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/9712268

    W. Thurston, 3-manifolds, foliations and circles I , math/9712268v1 [math.GT] https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/9712268

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    C. C. Tsang, Veering T riangulations and P seudo- A nosov F lows , ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 2023, Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley. 4675421

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.