Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 55 references

Toric geometry of generalized K\"ahler-Ricci solitons

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that symplectic-type toric generalized Kähler-Ricci solitons are exactly A-deformations of toric steady gradient Kähler-Ricci solitons, that this equivalence preserves completeness on noncompact Delzant toric manifolds, an

desk verdict Strong local equivalence and completeness theorems in toric GKRS, but the four-dimensional reduction leans on a false identity—worth refereeing, needs fixing. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.01639 v2 pith:SAFC4EVF submitted 2025-09-01 math.DG math.CV

Vestislav Apostolov , Giuseppe Barbaro , Jeffrey Streets , Yury Ustinovskiy This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DGmath.CV MSC 53C2553C5553D20
keywords generalizedKähler-RiccisolitonstoricA-deformationssymplectic-typeKählerstructuresGibbons-HawkingansatzMonge-AmpèreequationDelzantmanifoldsfour-dimensionalgeometry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that in the toric and 'symplectic-type' regime, generalized Kähler-Ricci solitons (GKRS) are not genuinely new objects: each is a constant-matrix twist, called an A-deformation, of an ordinary gradient steady Kähler-Ricci soliton. In four dimensions, every rank-2 GKRS whose associated Poisson tensor is not identically zero is locally of this form over a dense open set, and when the structure is global and complete the underlying Kähler soliton is complete and not Ricci-flat. This converts the study of such GKRS to the well-developed theory of toric Kähler-Ricci solitons, and turns known complete Kähler examples into complete generalized ones in all dimensions. A symmetric statement runs the other way: any A-deformation of a suitable complete toric KRS is a complete symplectic-type GKRS. The result unifies the four-dimensional Gibbons-Hawking-type classification of rank 1 with a new rank-2 picture and leaves the split-tangent (σ≡0) case open.

What carries the argument

The central object is the A-deformation: starting with a locally toric Kähler metric written in action-angle coordinates with symplectic potential u, one adds a constant skew-symmetric matrix A to the Hessian of u to define a new integrable complex structure J, and takes I to be the F-conjugate complex structure; the resulting data (F,g,I,J) is a symplectic-type generalized Kähler structure, with the original Kähler structure recovered when A=0. The argument's engine is a pair of canonical Killing fields XI = (1/2)I(θI♯ − ∇f) and XJ = (1/2)J(θJ♯ − ∇f) attached to any GKRS. The proof shows that in the toric/symplectic-type regime these vector fields span an n-dimensional integrable distributi

What would settle it

Compute, for any rank-2 GKRS written in the Gibbons-Hawking coordinates, the values of F+(XI,XJ) and λ=Ω(XI,XJ) along the region where σ≠0. Finding a nonzero F+(XI,XJ) or a nonconstant λ would violate the identities on which the toric reduction rests, so Theorem 1.4's conclusion that the structure is an A-deformation would be false. Alternatively, construct a complete symplectic-type rank-2 GKRS whose associated KRS is Ricci-flat; Corollary 3.15 predicts the rank would drop to at most 1, so such an example would overturn the classification.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is Theorem 1.4: on a four-manifold, any rank-2 GKRS whose canonical Poisson tensor σ is not identically zero is, over the dense open set where σ≠0, an A-deformation of a locally toric steady gradient Kähler-Ricci soliton; if the GKRS is globally symplectic-type and complete, the underlying Kähler-Ricci soliton is complete and non-Ricci-flat. The same circle of ideas yields Theorem 1.1 in all dimensions: for a symplectic-type toric GKRS satisfying four structural conditions, the GK structure is an A-deformation of a toric KRS, and conversely every A-deformation of a toric KRS satisfying the conditions is a GKRS. Theorem 1.2 adds that on noncompact toric Delzant manif

Load-bearing premise

The four-dimensional reduction works only in the 'symplectic-type' regime and assumes two local identities about the soliton's built-in symmetry fields; if either fails, the structure need not reduce to a Kähler soliton, and the split-tangent case where a key Poisson tensor vanishes identically is explicitly left open.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every known complete toric steady gradient KRS — for example Cao-type examples, products of cigar solitons, and crepant resolutions of toric Calabi-Yau cones — yields complete symplectic-type GKRS in all dimensions via A-deformation.
  • In four dimensions, the local classification of rank-2 GKRS with σ≠0 reduces to the local classification of toric KRS, and complete symplectic-type rank-2 GKRS are exactly A-deformations of complete non-Ricci-flat toric KRS.
  • The generalized scalar curvature of a complete toric GKRS is nonnegative; vanishing at one point forces the structure to be an A-deformation of a Ricci-flat toric Kähler metric, in which case the rank is at most one.
  • The four-dimensional rank-1 Gibbons-Hawking examples (multi-Eguchi-Hanson and multi-Taub-NUT) reappear as A-deformations of Ricci-flat gravitational instantons, showing the two approaches agree.
  • A-deformations and Legendre duality expose a mirror pair of symplectic potentials for F+ and F−, both of which satisfy the KRS equation, providing a concrete route to new global examples.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If this picture holds, the classification of complete symplectic-type rank-2 GKRS in four dimensions is essentially the classification of non-Ricci-flat complete toric KRS, so existing polytope data and asymptotic models for KRS should transfer unchanged.
  • The σ≡0 split-tangent case is the natural next frontier: it is the only four-dimensional rank-2 family not captured by the A-deformation reduction, and the methods here offer a concrete starting point for it.
  • The explicit formula for the soliton potential suggests that weighted volume and Perelman-type functionals on these GKRS can be computed from the symplectic potential alone; checking whether the weighted scalar curvature inequality remains sharp on known examples is a testable extension.
  • One could run the construction in reverse: choose an unbounded Delzant polytope and a constant matrix A, solve the drift Monge-Ampère equation with Abreu-Guillemin boundary conditions, and produce new complete GKRS metrics not previously known from any existing KRS construction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a toric-geometric duality between steady gradient Kähler–Ricci solitons (KRS) and A-type generalized Kähler–Ricci solitons (GKRS). In all dimensions, Theorem 1.1 gives a local equivalence, under four structural conditions, between symplectic-type toric GKRS and A-deformations of locally toric steady KRS. Theorem 1.2 and Proposition 3.1 address global extension and completeness, yielding new complete examples from known complete toric KRS and, in particular, Corollary 1.3 on crepant resolutions of toric Calabi–Yau cones. In four dimensions, Theorem 1.4 claims that every rank-2 GKRS with σ not identically zero is, on the dense set σ≠0, an A-deformation of a locally toric non-Ricci-flat KRS, and is complete when the original GKRS is symplectic-type and complete. The proof combines the Gibbons–Hawking reduction of [51] with two a priori facts: F±(XI,XJ)=0 (Proposition 2.9) and It=Jt (Lemma 4.4). A substantial part of the paper is devoted to explicit symplectic potentials, Legendre duality, Monge–Ampère equations, and toric rank-1 examples.

Significance. If the central theorems hold, the paper gives a powerful and elegant bridge between two active areas: classical toric Kähler–Ricci soliton theory and generalized Kähler geometry. The explicit A-deformation construction, the completeness transfer, and the four-dimensional reduction are significant and would yield many new complete GKRS, including a conjecturally exhaustive class in real dimension four. The paper is rich in explicit formulas: the soliton potential (2.20), the Lee-form identities (Lemma 2.19), the weighted scalar curvature identity (3.4), and the Monge–Ampère reduction (4.8) are concrete and checkable. However, the four-dimensional classification rests on Proposition 2.9, and the current proof of that proposition appears to contain a false assertion. Because Theorem 1.4 and its consequences depend on Proposition 2.9, this is a load-bearing gap that must be repaired before the main claims can be accepted.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2.1, Proposition 2.9] The proof states 'using further that θI = −θJ' without derivation. This identity is not a consequence of the preceding equations and is in fact false for genuine GKRS. For an A-deformation, Lemma 2.19 gives θI+θJ = (1+p)d log det Hess(u) − 2 d log det(Hess(u)+A). Taking Hess(u)=diag(h1,h2) and A=aJ0 with a≠0, this is generically non-zero; e.g. for h1=h2=h it equals −2h dh/(h^2+a^2) up to the factor depending on p. By the converse direction of Theorem 1.1, this A-deformation of a product of two cigar steady KRS is a symplectic-type GKRS. Thus θI=−θJ is not available, and the displayed computation of F+(XI,XJ) is invalid as written.
  2. [§1.2 and proof of Theorem 1.4] Theorem 1.4 relies on Proposition 2.9 to obtain F|t×t≡0, one of the four hypotheses of Theorem 1.1. Since Proposition 2.9's proof is invalid, the reduction of rank-2 GKRS to A-deformations of locally toric KRS is not established. The conclusion F±(XI,XJ)=0 may be true for nondegenerate rank-2 GKRS by a different argument (possibly using the decomposition in Lemma 4.2), but no such argument is supplied in the manuscript. This affects the local classification and the completeness-transfer and non-Ricci-flatness claims that build on Theorem 1.4. Please provide a correct proof of Proposition 2.9 in the needed rank-2 setting, or state and prove the precise weakened version that Theorem 1.4 requires.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.3, Lemma 2.16 and Remark 2.17] Equation (2.13) is written with '+ const', while Remark 2.17 says the constant can be normalized to zero by choosing a basis. Please reconcile the notation: either drop the constant and state the normalization, or keep the constant consistently throughout the subsequent identities that use (2.13).
  2. [§3.1, Remark 3.3] The classification of non-compact Delzant toric symplectic manifolds is attributed to [42], which is the Kleiner–Lott notes on Perelman's papers. The correct reference for the non-compact Delzant classification appears to be [41] (Karshon–Lerman) together with [22]. Please correct the citation.
  3. [§4.1, after (4.4)] The text says 'an a priori elliptic PDE that WX and WY must satisfy', but the notation WX, WY has not been introduced; this should presumably read WI and WJ, as in equations (4.4).
  4. [§3.4, Proposition 3.18] The proof defers many case checks to [51] with statements such as 'as explained in [51] §5.4.1' and 'arguing as in case (1)'. The derivation of the forced values |k±|=1, l±=0 is not fully transparent. Since Proposition 3.18 is presented as a classification statement, please identify the exact propositions in [51] used for each implication and expand the final step.
  5. [Throughout] There are several typographical issues: 'unbounded simple convex Delzant polytope' (Introduction) should be 'simple convex unbounded polytope' for consistency; 'Joural London Math. Soc.' in reference [15] should be 'Journal'; and the statement of Theorem 1.2 in the Introduction omits the non-compact Delzant hypothesis in its one-line formulation, which is present in the precise Theorem 3.9.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular reduction: the derivation is self-contained modulo prior theorems; the unsupported identity in Proposition 2.9 is a correctness gap, not a circular step.

full rationale

The paper's central equivalence (Theorem 1.1) is not circular. The forward direction constructs the KRS potential from an A-deformation using Lemmas 2.20–2.21 and the prior GKRS characterization [51, Prop 4.1]; the converse uses the same characterization to derive the KRS data (b,c) from the GKRS soliton vector fields. These cited results ([51], [12]) are prior theorems with stated assumptions different from the target toric equivalence; self-citation alone does not amount to circularity, and the citations are load-bearing but independent within the mathematical literature. Theorem 1.4 reduces four-dimensional rank-2 GKRS to Theorem 1.1 via Proposition 2.9 and Lemma 4.4. Lemma 4.4 derives It = Jt from Lemma 4.2 and the Gibbons-Hawking ansatz of [51], again relying on prior work without assuming the conclusion. The one genuine defect in the proof chain is Proposition 2.9: its proof invokes 'using further that θI = −θJ' with no derivation, and the skeptical counterexample suggests this identity can fail for explicit A-deformations. This is a correctness/verification gap, not a circular reduction: the target F±(XI,XJ) = 0 is not assumed as an input, and no equation is shown to equal itself by construction. The paper also openly leaves the σ ≡ 0 case open in Remark 1.5(2), which is honest incompleteness rather than circularity. Therefore no circularity step meets the required standard of quotation-plus-reduction, and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new geometric entities: the A-deformation, the Hitchin Poisson tensor, and generalized Kähler-Ricci solitons all come from prior literature. The central claim depends on the listed free constants and structural assumptions, which are stated explicitly in the theorems. The most fragile are the four-dimensional a priori identities in Propositions 2.9 and 4.4.

free parameters (4)
  • A (deformation bivector) = arbitrary element of Λ²t; in four dimensions A_{12}=1/λ
    A is an input to the A-deformation construction, not fitted to data, but every resulting metric depends on it.
  • b (KRS soliton vector) = element of t defined by fK = -<b,μ>
    Free constant in the Monge-Ampère equation (2.13); in complete examples it is part of the soliton data.
  • c (Monge-Ampère constant) = element of t*; in the Delzant case fixed by the boundary condition <∇L_j,c>=2
    Appears in (2.13) and carries the weighted scalar curvature -<b,c>.
  • λ = Ω(XI,XJ) = constant in Lemma 4.2; nonzero for rank 2
    Determines A in four dimensions; constancy is proven, not assumed, but it is a numerical characteristic of each example.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Delzant classification and momentum-map polytope description of non-compact toric symplectic manifolds with unbounded simple convex polytopes
    Used for global extension (Proposition 3.4), completeness (Theorem 3.9), and examples (Corollary 1.3).
  • domain assumption Boulanger's theorem that the A-deformation data (F,g,I,J) defines a symplectic-type generalized Kähler structure when Ψ=Hess(u)+A satisfies the integrability condition
    Assumed at Definition 2.11 and used in both directions of Theorem 1.1; cited to [16].
  • domain assumption The characterization of GKRS via ρJ + L_{JX_J}F = 0 and XJ = (1/2)J(θ_J^♯ - ∇f) from [51] Proposition 4.1
    Entry point for proving and using the soliton equations in Lemma 2.20, Lemma 2.21, and Theorem 1.1.
  • domain assumption Symplectic-type hypothesis: the form F_+ is globally defined and tames J
    Required for the global theorems 1.2, 1.4 and Corollary 3.14; the paper notes C²\{0} gives a non-symplectic-type example.
  • domain assumption Nonvanishing of the canonical Poisson tensor σ on a dense open set in the rank 2 four-dimensional case
    Needed to invert σ and use the Gibbons-Hawking ansatz; the σ≡0 split-tangent case is left open.
  • domain assumption The identity θI=-θJ in four dimensions
    Used without proof in Proposition 2.9 to obtain F±(XI,XJ)=0.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Toric geometry of generalized K\"ahler-Ricci solitons." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SAFC4EVF

@misc{pith2026250901639,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Toric geometry of generalized K\"ahler-Ricci solitons},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SAFC4EVF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.01639}
}
abstract

We establish a local equivalence between toric steady K\"ahler-Ricci solitons and $A$-type toric generalized K\"ahler-Ricci solitons (GKRS). Under natural global conditions we show this equivalence extends to complete GKRS, yielding a general construction of new examples in all dimensions. We show that in four dimensions, all GKRS are either described by the generalized K\"ahler Gibbons-Hawking ansatz, or have split tangent bundle, or are $A$-type toric. This yields a local classification in four dimensions, together with a conjecturally exhaustive construction of complete symplectic-type examples.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [51]

    The Gibbons-Hawking ansatz in generalized K¨ ahler geometry

    Jeffrey Streets and Yury Ustinovskiy. The Gibbons-Hawking ansatz in generalized K¨ ahler geometry. Comm. Math. Phys. , 391(2):707–778, 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [12]

    Generalized K¨ ahler-Ricci flow on toric Fano varieties

    Vestislav Apostolov, Jeffrey Streets, and Yury Ustinovskiy. Generalized K¨ ahler-Ricci flow on toric Fano varieties. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 375(6):4369–4409, 2022

    work page 2022

  3. [1]

    K¨ ahler metrics on toric orbifolds.Journal of Differential Geometry, 58(1):151–187, 2001

    Miguel Abreu. K¨ ahler metrics on toric orbifolds.Journal of Differential Geometry, 58(1):151–187, 2001

    work page 2001

  4. [2]

    Scalar-flat K¨ ahler metrics on non-compact symplectic toric 4- manifolds

    Miguel Abreu and Rosa Sena-Dias. Scalar-flat K¨ ahler metrics on non-compact symplectic toric 4- manifolds. Annals of Global Analysis and Geometry , 41(2):209–239, 2012

    work page 2012

  5. [3]

    Bi-Hermitian structures on complex surfaces

    Vestislav Apostolov, Paul Gauduchon, and Gueo Grantcharov. Bi-Hermitian structures on complex surfaces. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) , 79(2):414–428, 1999

    work page 1999

  6. [4]

    The K\"ahler geometry of toric manifolds

    Vestislav Apostolov. The K¨ ahler geometry of toric manifolds.arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.12493 , 2022

    work page Pith review arXiv 2022

  7. [5]

    Extremal K¨ ahler Poincar´ e type metrics on toric varieties

    Vestislav Apostolov, Hugues Auvray, and Lars Martin Sektnan. Extremal K¨ ahler Poincar´ e type metrics on toric varieties. J. Geom. Anal. , 31:1223–1290, 2021

    work page 2021

  8. [6]

    Rigidity results for non- K¨ ahler Calabi-Yau geometries on threefolds.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.09648 , 2024

    Vestislav Apostolov, Giuseppe Barbaro, Kuan-Hui Lee, and Jeffrey Streets. Rigidity results for non- K¨ ahler Calabi-Yau geometries on threefolds.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.09648 , 2024

    arXiv 2024

Show all 55 references
  1. [7]

    Hamiltonian 2-forms in K¨ ahler geometry, II Global Classification

    Vestislav Apostolov, David MJ Calderbank, Paul Gauduchon, and Christina W Tønnesen-Friedman. Hamiltonian 2-forms in K¨ ahler geometry, II Global Classification. Journal of Differential Geometry , 68(2):277–345, 2004

    2004

  2. [8]

    Hamiltonian 2-forms and new explicit Calabi–Yau metrics and gradient steady K¨ ahler–Ricci solitons on Cn

    Vestislav Apostolov and Charles Cifarelli. Hamiltonian 2-forms and new explicit Calabi–Yau metrics and gradient steady K¨ ahler–Ricci solitons on Cn. Journal of Differential Geometry , 130(3):517–570, 2025

    2025

  3. [9]

    The generalized K¨ ahler Calabi-Yau problem

    Vestislav Apostolov, Xin Fu, Jeffrey Streets, and Yury Ustinovskiy. The generalized K¨ ahler Calabi-Yau problem. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.09104 , 2022

    2022 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Generalized K¨ ahler manifolds, commuting complex structures, and split tangent bundles

    Vestislav Apostolov and Marco Gualtieri. Generalized K¨ ahler manifolds, commuting complex structures, and split tangent bundles. Comm. Math. Phys. , 271(2):561–575, 2007

    2007

  5. [11]

    The nondegenerate generalized K¨ ahler Calabi-Yau problem.J

    Vestislav Apostolov and Jeffrey Streets. The nondegenerate generalized K¨ ahler Calabi-Yau problem.J. Reine Angew. Math. , 777:1–48, 2021

    2021

  6. [13]

    Variational structure and uniqueness of generalized K¨ ahler–Ricci solitons.Peking Mathematical Journal , 6(2):307–351, 2023

    Vestislav Apostolov, Jeffrey Streets, and Yury Ustinovskiy. Variational structure and uniqueness of generalized K¨ ahler–Ricci solitons.Peking Mathematical Journal , 6(2):307–351, 2023

    2023

  7. [14]

    Formal structure of scalar curvature in generalized K¨ ahler geometry.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.14595 , 2024

    Vestislav Apostolov, Jeffrey Streets, and Yury Ustinovskiy. Formal structure of scalar curvature in generalized K¨ ahler geometry.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.14595 , 2024

    2024

  8. [15]

    Steady K¨ ahler–Ricci solitons on crepant resolutions of finite quotients of Cn

    Olivier Biquard and Heather Macbeth. Steady K¨ ahler–Ricci solitons on crepant resolutions of finite quotients of Cn. Joural London Math. Soc. , 109:e12833, 2024

    2024

  9. [16]

    Toric generalized K¨ ahler structures

    Laurence Boulanger. Toric generalized K¨ ahler structures. Journal of Symplectic Geometry , 17(4):973– 1019, 2019

    2019

  10. [17]

    G´ eom´ etrie Diff´ erentielle, Physique Math´ ematique, Math ´ matiques et Soci´ et´ e’ i

    Robert Bryant. Gradient K¨ ahler–Ricci solitons, in “G´ eom´ etrie Diff´ erentielle, Physique Math´ ematique, Math ´ matiques et Soci´ et´ e’ i”.Ast´ erisque, 321:51–97, 2008

    2008

  11. [18]

    Existence of gradient K¨ ahler-Ricci solitons

    Huai-Dong Cao. Existence of gradient K¨ ahler-Ricci solitons. InElliptic and parabolic methods in geom- etry, pages 1–16. AK Peters/CRC Press, 1996

    1996

  12. [19]

    Strong uniqueness of the Ricci flow

    Bing-Long Chen. Strong uniqueness of the Ricci flow. Journal of Differential Geometry , 82(2):363–382, 2009

    2009

  13. [20]

    Uniqueness of the Ricci flow on complete noncompact manifolds

    Bing-Long Chen and Xi-Ping Zhu. Uniqueness of the Ricci flow on complete noncompact manifolds. J. Differential Geom., 74(1):119–154, 2006

    2006

  14. [21]

    Ricci solitons in low dimensions , volume 235

    Bennett Chow. Ricci solitons in low dimensions , volume 235. American Mathematical Society, 2023

    2023

  15. [22]

    Uniqueness of shrinking gradient K¨ ahler-Ricci solitons on non-compact toric manifolds

    Charles Cifarelli. Uniqueness of shrinking gradient K¨ ahler-Ricci solitons on non-compact toric manifolds. Journal of the London Mathematical Society , 106(4):3746–3791, 2022

    2022

  16. [23]

    Explicit complete Ricci-flat metrics and K¨ ahler–Ricci solitons on direct sum bundles

    Charles Cifarelli. Explicit complete Ricci-flat metrics and K¨ ahler–Ricci solitons on direct sum bundles. arxiv:2410.23645, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  17. [24]

    A family of K¨ ahler flying wing steady Ricci solitons

    Ronan Conlon, Pak-Yeung Chan, and Yi Lai. A family of K¨ ahler flying wing steady Ricci solitons. arXiv:2403.04089, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Steady gradient K¨ ahler-Ricci solitons on crepant resolutions of Calabi- Yau cones

    Ronan Conlon and Alex Deruelle. Steady gradient K¨ ahler-Ricci solitons on crepant resolutions of Calabi- Yau cones. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. , 307:No 1055, 2025

    2025

  19. [26]

    Dancer and McKenzie Wang

    Andrew S. Dancer and McKenzie Wang. On Ricci solitons of cohomogeneity one. Ann. Global Anal. Geom, 39:259–292, 2011. TORIC GEOMETRY OF GENERALIZED K¨AHLER-RICCI SOLITONS 37

    2011

  20. [27]

    Interior estimates for solutions of Abreu’s equation

    Simon K Donaldson. Interior estimates for solutions of Abreu’s equation. Collectanea Mathematica , 56(2):103-412, 2005

    2005

  21. [28]

    Remarks on gauge theory, complex geometry and 4-manifold topology

    SK Donaldson. Remarks on gauge theory, complex geometry and 4-manifold topology. Fields Medallists’ Lectures,, (9), 2003

    2003

  22. [29]

    Handbook of geometric analysis

    SK Donaldson. K¨ ahler geometry on toric manifolds and some other manifolds with large symmetry. In: “Handbook of geometric analysis” Adv. Lect. Math. (ALM). Int. Press, Somerville, MA , 7(1):29–75, 2008

    2008

  23. [30]

    Constructing K¨ ahler-Ricci solitons from sasaki-einstein manifolds

    Akito Futaki and Mu-Tao Wang. Constructing K¨ ahler-Ricci solitons from sasaki-einstein manifolds. Asian J. Math. , 15:33–52, 2011

    2011

  24. [31]

    Generalized Ricci Flow

    Mario Garcia-Fernandez and Jeffrey Streets. Generalized Ricci Flow . University Lecture Series. AMS, 2020

    2020

  25. [32]

    S. J. Gates, Jr., C. M. Hull, and M. Roˇ cek. Twisted multiplets and new supersymmetric nonlinear σ-models. Nuclear Phys. B , 248(1):157–186, 1984

    1984

  26. [33]

    Scalar curvature and the moment map in generalized K¨ ahler geometry.arXiv:2105.13654

    Ryushi Goto. Scalar curvature and the moment map in generalized K¨ ahler geometry.arXiv:2105.13654

    arXiv

  27. [34]

    Scalar curvature as moment map in generalized K¨ ahler geometry

    Ryushi Goto. Scalar curvature as moment map in generalized K¨ ahler geometry. Journal of Symplectic Geometry, 18(1):147–190, 2020

    2020

  28. [35]

    Generalized complex geometry

    Marco Gualtieri. Generalized complex geometry. Ann. of Math. (2) , 174(1):75–123, 2011

    2011

  29. [36]

    Generalized K¨ ahler geometry.Comm

    Marco Gualtieri. Generalized K¨ ahler geometry.Comm. Math. Phys. , 331(1):297–331, 2014

    2014

  30. [37]

    Kaehler structures on toric varieties

    Victor Guillemin. Kaehler structures on toric varieties. Journal of differential geometry , 40(2):285–309, 1994

    1994

  31. [38]

    Superconformal structures on generalized Calabi-Yau metric manifolds

    Reimundo Heluani and Maxim Zabzine. Superconformal structures on generalized Calabi-Yau metric manifolds. Comm. Math. Phys. , 306(2):333–364, 2011

    2011

  32. [39]

    Generalized Calabi-Yau manifolds

    Nigel Hitchin. Generalized Calabi-Yau manifolds. Q. J. Math. , 54(3):281–308, 2003

    2003

  33. [40]

    Instantons, Poisson structures and generalized K¨ ahler geometry

    Nigel Hitchin. Instantons, Poisson structures and generalized K¨ ahler geometry. Comm. Math. Phys. , 265(1):131–164, 2006

    2006

  34. [41]

    Non-compact symplectic toric manifolds

    Yael Karshon, Eugene Lerman, et al. Non-compact symplectic toric manifolds. SIGMA. Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications , 11:055, 2015

    2015

  35. [42]

    Notes on Perelman’s papers

    Bruce Kleiner and John Lott. Notes on Perelman’s papers. Geom. Topol., 12(5):2587–2855, 2008

    2008

  36. [43]

    Hessian metrics, cd (k, n)-spaces, and optimal transportation of log-concave measures

    Alexander V Kolesnikov. Hessian metrics, cd (k, n)-spaces, and optimal transportation of log-concave measures. arXiv preprint arXiv:1201.2342 , 2012

    2012 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Oliynyk, V

    T. Oliynyk, V. Suneeta, and E. Woolgar. A gradient flow for worldsheet nonlinear sigma models.Nuclear Phys. B , 739(3):441–458, 2006

    2006

  38. [45]

    Pure metric geometry

    Anton Petrunin. Pure metric geometry . Springer, 2023

    2023

  39. [46]

    Complex structures on Riemannian four-manifolds

    Massimiliano Pontecorvo. Complex structures on Riemannian four-manifolds. Math. Ann., 309(1):159– 177, 1997

    1997

  40. [47]

    Asymptotically cylindrical steady K¨ ahler-Ricci solitons.arXiv:2103.12629, 2021

    Johannes Sch¨ afer. Asymptotically cylindrical steady K¨ ahler-Ricci solitons.arXiv:2103.12629, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Uniqueness among scalar-flat K¨ ahler metrics on non-compact toric 4-manifolds.Journal of the London Mathematical Society , 103(2):372–397, 2021

    Rosa Sena-Dias. Uniqueness among scalar-flat K¨ ahler metrics on non-compact toric 4-manifolds.Journal of the London Mathematical Society , 103(2):372–397, 2021

    2021

  42. [49]

    A parabolic flow of pluriclosed metrics

    Jeffrey Streets and Gang Tian. A parabolic flow of pluriclosed metrics. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , (16):3101–3133, 2010

    2010

  43. [50]

    Generalized K¨ ahler geometry and the pluriclosed flow.Nuclear Phys

    Jeffrey Streets and Gang Tian. Generalized K¨ ahler geometry and the pluriclosed flow.Nuclear Phys. B, 858(2):366–376, 2012

    2012

  44. [52]

    On the geometry of steady toric K¨ ahler-Ricci solitons

    Yury Ustinovskiy. On the geometry of steady toric K¨ ahler-Ricci solitons. The Journal of Geometric Analysis, 34(3):78, 2024

    2024

  45. [53]

    Toric generalized K¨ ahler structures

    Yicao Wang. Toric generalized K¨ ahler structures. iii. Journal of Geometry and Physics , 151:103634, 2020

    2020

  46. [54]

    Toric generalized K¨ ahler structures

    Yicao Wang. Toric generalized K¨ ahler structures. i. Differential Geometry and its Applications , 81:101864, 2022

    2022

  47. [55]

    Toric generalized K¨ ahler structures

    Yicao Wang. Toric generalized K¨ ahler structures. ii. Journal of Symplectic Geometry , 21(2):235–264, 2023. 38 VESTISLA V APOSTOLOV, GIUSEPPE BARBARO, JEFFREY STREETS, AND YURY USTINOVSKIY V. Apostolov, D´epartement de Math´ematiques, UQAM, and, Institute of Mathematics and I...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.