Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Sharp unconditional well-posedness of the 2-$d$ periodic cubic hyperbolic nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The cubic hyperbolic NLS on the two-torus is locally well-posed exactly above s=1−1/p in Fourier–Lebesgue spaces, and unconditional uniqueness holds throughout that regime.

desk verdict A serious paper that delivers the first unconditional uniqueness for hyperbolic NLS on T2 and a genuinely new counting lemma; the two omitted 'standard' arguments are a real gap, but the core looks sound. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.01650 v1 pith:Z4CWQJX4 submitted 2025-09-01 math.AP

Engin Başakoğlu , Tadahiro Oh , Yuzhao Wang This is my paper
classification math.AP MSC 35Q5537G05
keywords hyperbolicnonlinearSchrödingerequationFourier–LebesguespacesunconditionaluniquenessnormalformreductionFourierrestrictionnormmethodcountingestimateperiodictoruswell-posedness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies the cubic hyperbolic nonlinear Schrödinger equation on the two-dimensional torus—a mixed-sign dispersion model for modulated gravity water waves whose standard estimates are weaker than those for the usual cubic NLS. It aims to prove that this equation is semilinearly locally well-posed in Fourier–Lebesgue spaces exactly for s>1−1/p, ill-posed below that line, and—by an infinite normal-form reduction—unconditionally locally well-posed in that natural class, so uniqueness holds without intersecting any auxiliary function space. It also claims a byproduct: sharp unconditional uniqueness for the usual cubic NLS on T^2 in Fourier–Lebesgue spaces for p≥3. The concrete stake is that the threshold separates a regime where contraction methods work from one where the solution map cannot even be C^3, and the normal-form equation behaves better than the original equation at low regularity.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the hyperbolic counting estimate (Lemma 2.1): for fixed dyadic frequency sizes, the set of frequency triples satisfying the hyperbolic modulation relation has size at most a constant times N1N3 max(N1,N3)^θ, with an analogue for pairs N1,N2 and θ>0 arbitrarily small. The proof rewrites the modulation equation as products of differences such as (j−j1)(j−j3)−(k−k1)(k−k3)=µ and applies a divisor-counting lemma. This estimate controls both the X^{s,b} trilinear estimate behind Theorem 1.2(i) and the multilinear operators N_0^{(j)}, N_1^{(j)}, R^{(j)} produced by the infinite normal-form reduction. The normal-form equation (1.21)—an infinite superposition of autonomous

What would settle it

Take the diagonal-data family f_N in Lemma A.4 and compare the original Duhamel iterate A[f_N](t) with the first nontrivial cubic term of the normal-form equation for the same data. If the growth rates in N differ for fixed t—the paper predicts N^{2−2s−2/p} for the Picard iterate—or if the infinite normal-form series fails to represent the solution at regularity (1.14) on any such example, then the equivalence at the heart of Theorem 1.4 is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the periodic cubic hyperbolic NLS has an essentially sharp semilinear theory in Fourier–Lebesgue spaces: Theorem 1.2 establishes local well-posedness for s>1−1/p and failure of C^3-smoothness of the solution map for s<1−1/p, leaving only the endpoint undecided. The deeper claim is Theorem 1.4: under regularity s>1−1/p for 1<p≤3 and s>4/3−2/p for p≥3, the equation is unconditionally locally well-posed in FL^{s,p}(T^2)—uniqueness holds in the whole class C([0,T];FL^{s,p}) without any X^{s,b}-space. The proof transforms the equation through infinitely many normal-form reductions into an equation whose multilinear terms carry dispersive smoothing, then proves by a plain

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on the claim that the infinite sequence of normal-form reductions converges and that the resulting normal-form equation is exactly equivalent to the original equation in the stated regularity range; the equivalence proof is asserted as standard and not written out.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The threshold s=1−1/p is, modulo the endpoint, the exact regularity barrier for semilinear well-posedness of the cubic hyperbolic NLS on T^2, and almost scaling-critical Fourier–Lebesgue spaces are covered as p→∞.
  • Unconditional uniqueness holds throughout the semilinear well-posedness regime for 1<p≤3, so uniqueness is a property of the equation itself, not of the particular construction.
  • For 3<p<∞ the normal-form equation is better behaved than the original equation: it is unconditionally well-posed even in a range where the original equation's semilinear theory is not.
  • The same hyperbolic counting estimate transfers to the elliptic cubic NLS and yields sharp unconditional uniqueness in FL^{s,p} for p≥3.
  • The normal-form method alone yields local well-posedness in the sense of sensible weak solutions—unique limits of smooth solutions—without relying on the Fourier restriction norm method.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The endpoint s=1−1/p is the natural next test: the counting estimate carries an arbitrarily small θ-loss, so a finer arithmetic argument might decide whether the endpoint is well- or ill-posed.
  • Because the mechanism only requires the modulation to factor into products of integer differences, the same threshold mechanism likely applies to other non-elliptic Schrödinger-type equations on T^d with factored modulation functions.
  • The equivalence asserted in Remark 1.8 could be checked explicitly on diagonal-frequency solutions, where the hyperbolic propagator acts trivially, giving an independent verification of the normal-form reduction without relying on the omitted proof.
  • If the normal-form equivalence holds as stated, the method should extend to stochastic or forced hyperbolic NLS, since the normal-form contraction argument does not depend on sub-optimal auxiliary spaces.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the two-dimensional periodic cubic hyperbolic nonlinear Schrödinger equation i∂tu + □u + |u|²u = 0 on T². Its main results are: (i) semilinear local well-posedness of (1.1) in Fourier–Lebesgue spaces FL^{s,p}(T²) for s > 1 − 1/p and ill-posedness (failure of C³-smoothness of the solution map) for s < 1 − 1/p (Theorem 1.2); (ii) unconditional local well-posedness of the associated infinite normal form equation (1.21) for s > 1 − 1/p (Theorem 1.7); and (iii) unconditional local well-posedness of the original HNLS in FL^{s,p} under the regularity conditions (1.14) (Theorem 1.4). The proofs combine a Fourier restriction norm method with a hyperbolic counting estimate (Lemma 2.1) and an infinite Poincaré–Dulac normal form reduction adapted from [40,66]. A byproduct is a corresponding unconditional uniqueness statement for the usual cubic NLS on T² for p ≥ 3.

Significance. If the main claims are accepted, this is the first unconditional uniqueness result for hyperbolic nonlinear Schrödinger equations on T², and it extends the sharp well-posedness result of [75] to Fourier–Lebesgue spaces. The hyperbolic counting estimate (Lemma 2.1) is a useful and apparently sharp ingredient, and the multilinear estimates in Lemmas 3.13–3.15 are proved in detail with an induction that is well adapted to the hyperbolic resonance structure. The paper also gives concrete ill-posedness below the semilinear threshold. The central weakness is not in these estimates but in the transfer from the normal form equation back to the original equation: the equivalence of (1.1) and (1.21) is asserted with the proof omitted, and this equivalence is load-bearing for Theorem 1.4.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.3, Remark 1.8 (Eqs. (1.21), (3.16)–(3.18))] Theorem 1.4 is deduced from Theorem 1.7(i) via the assertion that (1.1) and the normal form equation (1.21) are equivalent under the regularity condition (1.14), but the proof is omitted. This is a load-bearing step, not a cosmetic one. Lemma 3.10 only proves that N_2^{(J)}(u)(t) → 0 in FL∞ uniformly in t; it does not by itself show that the infinite sums defining (1.21) converge in C_t FL^{s,p}, nor that the term-by-term time differentiations used in (3.6) and (3.14) are legitimate in that topology. The converse implication—that a solution of the integral equation (1.21) can be differentiated to recover the original HNLS (1.1)—is also asserted without proof. Please supply the missing details, or state precisely which results in [40,66] cover the present hyperbolic FL^{s,p} setting and verify the topology in which the equivalence holds.
  2. [§1.3, Theorem 1.7(i) and Remark 4.2] The proof of Theorem 1.7(i) is reduced to “a simple contraction argument” and omitted, with a reference to [66, Section 2]. Since Theorem 1.7(i) is itself a central result and since the contraction must use the difference estimates of Remark 4.2, including control of the O(J) loss in (4.15) and a consistent choice of K and T, the fixed-point argument should be written out or at least summarized precisely. The estimates in Lemmas 3.13–3.15 are the main part, but the contraction in C([0,T];FL^{s,p}) for the map defined by (1.21) is not explicitly established in the manuscript.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§1.4] The outline says “In Section 1.21, we go over…” but the normal form reduction is in Section 3; the reference should be corrected.
  2. [Remark 3.11] The statement “u ∈ C([0,T]; FL^{s,p}(T³))” should presumably be FL^{s,p}(T²), since the spatial domain throughout the paper is T².
  3. [Eqs. (3.13)–(3.14)] The indicator notation such as 1_{∩_{k=1}^j A_k^c} is compressed and not explicitly defined; a brief explanation would improve readability.
  4. [§4.1, Eq. (4.8)] In the derivation of (4.8), the intermediate sum over α_k with |α_k + eα_{k−1}| < ((2k+1)K)^{4p} is estimated by ((2k+1)K)^{4p(1−p′)}; this is correct but should be written out, since the exponent 4p is not otherwise explained.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; new counting and multilinear estimates carry the proofs; the omitted equivalence proof is a gap, not a constructional reduction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. Theorem 1.2(i) is proved in Appendix A from Proposition A.2, which follows from the self-contained hyperbolic counting estimate Lemma 2.1 via the divisor-counting Lemma 2.2. Theorem 1.7(i) is based on Lemmas 3.13–3.15, proved in Section 4 using Lemma 2.1; no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction and no quantity is defined in terms of the theorem being proved. The only load-bearing point not fully written is the asserted equivalence of (1.1) and the normal form equation (1.21): Remark 1.8 states that under (1.14) the equations are equivalent and refers to [66, Section 2.2], and Section 1.3 says 'Since this part of the argument is standard, we omit details; see [40,66].' This is a genuine proof gap and a correctness risk — the J→∞ passage from (3.16) to (3.18) and the converse differentiation of (1.21) back to (1.1) are not demonstrated, and the citations are to the authors' own prior work. It is not, however, circularity: (1.21) is formally derived from (1.1) in Section 3 rather than defined in terms of the desired uniqueness, and the cited results concern different (one-dimensional elliptic) problems, so they do not by themselves force the hyperbolic theorem. The new counting estimates, multilinear bounds, and sharp thresholds are independent of the claimed conclusion, so the central result does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard divisor-counting and linear X^{s,b}_p estimates, plus the structural assumption that the normal form reduction from [40,66] is valid in the hyperbolic setting and that (1.1) is equivalent to (1.21) under (1.14). The only hand-chosen parameter is the cutoff K, which is part of the proof machinery rather than a fitted constant.

free parameters (2)
  • K = chosen >=1 depending on ||u(0)||_{FL^{s,p}} (not a numerical fit)
    Cutoff size in the nearly resonant set A_j (3.4), (3.12): |\tilde μ_j| <= ((2j+1)K)^{4p}. K is a hand-chosen parameter that controls the size of the near-resonant modulation regions; the contraction proof in Theorem 1.7(i) depends on choosing K appropriately.
  • θ = arbitrarily small positive (e.g. any θ>0)
    Loss exponent in the divisor-counting bound in Lemma 2.1. It is not fitted; the estimates hold for every θ>0, and s>1-1/p is obtained by taking θ sufficiently small.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Divisor counting bound (Lemma 2.2)
    Used in the proof of Lemma 2.1 to bound the number of solutions to m=ab in a rectangle. Taken from [19, Lemma 4.4].
  • standard math Linear estimates for X^{s,b}_p spaces (Lemma A.1)
    Used in the proof of Theorem 1.2(i) via the Fourier restriction norm method. Quoted from [30, Lemma 2.2].
  • domain assumption Equivalence of the cubic HNLS (1.1) and the normal form equation (1.21) under regularity (1.14)
    The paper asserts (Remark 1.8) that under (1.14) the two equations are equivalent, and that the proof is standard following [40,66]; the details are omitted. This is a structural premise for the deduction of Theorem 1.4 from Theorem 1.7(i).
  • domain assumption The Fourier restriction norm framework and infinite Poincaré-Dulac normal form reductions from [40,66] are applicable in the hyperbolic 2D periodic setting
    The formal normal form derivation in Section 3 follows [40,66] with the hyperbolic modulation Φ in (1.20); the paper verifies the new counting estimates for the hyperbolic algebraic variety, but the overall validity of the infinite reduction is inherited from the cited works.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sharp unconditional well-posedness of the 2-$d$ periodic cubic hyperbolic nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Z4CWQJX4

@misc{pith2026250901650,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sharp unconditional well-posedness of the 2-$d$ periodic cubic hyperbolic nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Z4CWQJX4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.01650}
}
abstract

We study semilinear local well-posedness of the two-dimensional periodic cubic hyperbolic nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation (HNLS) in Fourier-Lebesgue spaces. By employing the Fourier restriction norm method, we first establish sharp semilinear local well-posedness of HNLS in Fourier-Lebesgue spaces (modulo the endpoint case), including almost scaling-critical Fourier-Lebesgue spaces. Then, by adapting the normal form approach, developed by the second author with Guo and Kwon (2013) and by the second and third authors (2021), to the current hyperbolic setting, we establish sharp unconditional uniqueness of HNLS within the semilinear local well-posedness regime. As a key ingredient to both results, we establish sharp counting estimates for the hyperbolic Schr\"odinger equation. As a byproduct of our analysis, we also obtain sharp unconditional uniqueness of the (usual) two-dimensional periodic cubic nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation in Fourier--Lebesgue spaces for $p \ge 3$.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Unconditional well-posedness of the stochastic Korteweg-de Vries equation on the real line

    math.AP 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Global well-posedness and optimal pathwise unconditional uniqueness for the additive-noise stochastic KdV on R in L² are established by adapting the Fourier restriction norm method to Fourier-Lebesgue spaces in time.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [75]

    Wang, Periodic cubic Hyperbolic Schr¨ odinger equation onT2, J

    Y. Wang, Periodic cubic Hyperbolic Schr¨ odinger equation onT2, J. Funct. Anal. 265 (2013), no. 3, 424– 434

    work page 2013

  2. [1]

    Babin, A

    A. Babin, A. Ilyin, E. Titi, On the regularization mechanism for the periodic Korteweg–de Vries equation , Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 64 (2011), no. 5, 591–648

    work page 2011

  3. [2]

    Bambusi, B

    D. Bambusi, B. Gr´ ebert,Birkhoff normal form for partial differential equations with tame modulus , Duke Math. J. 135 (2006), no. 3, 507–567

    work page 2006

  4. [3]

    Ba¸ sako˘ glu, C

    E. Ba¸ sako˘ glu, C. Sun, N. Tzvetkov, Y. Wang, Hyperbolic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations on R × T, arXiv:2504.15836 [math.AP]

    work page arXiv

  5. [4]

    Bourgain, C

    J. Bourgain, C. Demeter, Decouplings for curves and hypersurfaces with nonzero Gaussian curvature , J. Anal. Math. 133 (2017), no. 1, 279–311

    work page 2017

  6. [5]

    Bourgain, Fourier transform restriction phenomena for certain lattice subsets and applications to non- linear evolution equations

    J. Bourgain, Fourier transform restriction phenomena for certain lattice subsets and applications to non- linear evolution equations. I. Schr¨ odinger equations, Geom. Funct. Anal. 3 (1993), no. 2, 107–156

    work page 1993

  7. [6]

    Bourgain, Invariant measures for the 2D-defocusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation , Comm

    J. Bourgain, Invariant measures for the 2D-defocusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation , Comm. Math. Phys. 176 (1996), no.2, 421–445

    work page 1996

  8. [7]

    Bourgain, Periodic Korteweg de Vries equation with measures as initial data , Selecta Math

    J. Bourgain, Periodic Korteweg de Vries equation with measures as initial data , Selecta Math. 3 (1997), no. 2, 115–159

    work page 1997

Show all 76 references
  1. [8]

    Bruned Derivation of normal forms for dispersive PDEs via arborification , arXiv:2409.03642 [math.AP]

    Y. Bruned Derivation of normal forms for dispersive PDEs via arborification , arXiv:2409.03642 [math.AP]

    arXiv

  2. [9]

    Bruned, K

    Y. Bruned, K. Schratz, Resonance-based schemes for dispersive equations via decorated trees, Forum Math. Pi 10 (2022), Paper No. e2, 76 pp. HYPERBOLIC NLS 29

    2022

  3. [10]

    upside-down

    J. Colliander, S. Kwon, T. Oh, A remark on normal forms and the “upside-down ” I-method for periodic NLS: growth of higher Sobolev norms , J. Anal. Math. 118 (2012), 55–82

    2012

  4. [11]

    Chapouto, A remark on the well-posedness of the modified KdV equation in the Fourier–Lebesgue spaces, Discrete Contin

    A. Chapouto, A remark on the well-posedness of the modified KdV equation in the Fourier–Lebesgue spaces, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. A, 41 (2021), no. 8, 3915–3950

    2021

  5. [12]

    Chapouto, A refined well-posedness result for the modified KdV equation in the Fourier–Lebesgue spaces, J

    A. Chapouto, A refined well-posedness result for the modified KdV equation in the Fourier–Lebesgue spaces, J. Dynam. Differential Equations, 35 (2023), no. 3, 2537–2578

    2023

  6. [13]

    Chapouto, J

    A. Chapouto, J. Forlano, T. Oh, Normal form integrator for dispersive equations , in preparation

  7. [14]

    X. Chen, J. Holmer, The derivation of the T3 energy-critical NLS from quantum many-body dynamics , Invent. Math. 217 (2019), no. 2, 433–547

    2019

  8. [15]

    X. Chen, J. Holmer, Unconditional uniqueness for the energy-critical nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation on T4, Forum Math. Pi 10 (2022), 49 pp

    2022

  9. [16]

    X. Chen, S. Shen, Z. Zhang, The unconditional uniqueness for the energy-supercritical NLS , Ann. PDE. 8 (2022), no. 14, 82 pp

    2022

  10. [17]

    Chung, Z

    J. Chung, Z. Guo, S. Kwon, T. Oh, Normal form approach to global well-posedness of the quadratic derivative nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation on the circle , Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire 34 (2017), no. 5, 1273–1297

    2017

  11. [18]

    Correia, J.D

    S. Correia, J.D. Silva, Nonlinear smoothing for dispersive PDE: a unified approach , J. Differential Equa- tions 269 (2020), no. 5, 4253–4285

    2020

  12. [19]

    Y. Deng, A. Nahmod, Y. Haitian, Invariant Gibbs measures and global strong solutions for nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations in dimension two, Ann. of Math. 200 (2024), no. 2, 399–486

    2024

  13. [20]

    The profile decomposition for the hyperbolic Schr¨ odinger equation

    B. Dodson, J. Marzuola, B. Pausader, D. Spirn, The profile decomposition for the hyperbolic Schr¨ odinger equation, Illinois J. Math. 62 (2018), no. 1-4, 293–320. Erratum to “ The profile decomposition for the hyperbolic Schr¨ odinger equation”, Illinois J. Math. 65 (2021), no...

    2018

  14. [21]

    Ecalle, B

    J. Ecalle, B. Vallet, The arborification-coarborification transform: analytic, combinatorial, and algebraic aspects, Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. 13 (2004), no. 4, 575–657

    2004

  15. [22]

    Erdo˘ gan, N

    M.B. Erdo˘ gan, N. Tzirakis,Global smoothing for the periodic KdV evolution , Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN (2013), no. 20, 4589–4614

    2013

  16. [23]

    Erdo˘ gan, N

    M.B. Erdo˘ gan, N. Tzirakis,Smoothing and global attractors for the Zakharov system on the torus , Anal. PDE 6 (2013), no. 3, 723–750

    2013

  17. [24]

    Erdo˘ gan, N

    M.B. Erdo˘ gan, N. Tzirakis,Dispersive partial differential equations. Wellposedness and applications. Lon- don Mathematical Society Student Texts, 86. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2016. xvi+186 pp

    2016

  18. [25]

    D. Fang, H. Zheng, On the unconditional uniqueness for NLS in ˙H s, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 45 (2013), no. 3, 1505–1526

    2013

  19. [26]

    Fauvet, F

    F. Fauvet, F. Menous, Ecalle’s arborification-coarborification transforms and Connes-Kreimer Hopf alge- bra, Ann. Sci. ´Ec. Norm. Sup´ er. 50 (2017), no. 1, 39–83

    2017

  20. [27]

    Foissy, J

    L. Foissy, J. Unterberger, Ordered forests, permutations, and iterated integrals, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2013, no. 4, 846–885

    2013

  21. [28]

    Forlano, G

    J. Forlano, G. Li, T. Zhao, Unconditional deep-water limit of the intermediate long wave equation in low-regularity, NoDEA Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl. 32 (2025), no. 2, Paper No. 28, 31 pp

    2025

  22. [29]

    Forlano, T

    J. Forlano, T. Oh, Normal form approach to the one-dimensional cubic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation in Fourier-amalgam spaces, preprint

  23. [30]

    Forlano, T

    J. Forlano, T. Oh and Y. Wang, Stochastic cubic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with almost space-time white noise , J. Aust. Math. Soc. 109 (2020), no. 1, 44–67

    2020

  24. [31]

    Furioli, F

    G. Furioli, F. Planchon, E. Terraneo, Unconditional well-posedness for semilinear Schr¨ odinger and wave equations in H s, Harmonic analysis at Mount Holyoke (South Hadley, MA, 2001), 147–156, Contemp. Math., 320, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2003

    2001

  25. [32]

    Ginibre, Y

    J. Ginibre, Y. Tsutsumi, G. Velo, On the Cauchy problem for the Zakharov system , J. Funct. Anal. 151 (1997), no. 2, 384–436

    1997

  26. [33]

    Godet, A lower bound on the blow-up rate for the Davey–Stewartson system on the torus , Ann

    N. Godet, A lower bound on the blow-up rate for the Davey–Stewartson system on the torus , Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire 30 (2013), no. 4, 691–703

    2013

  27. [34]

    Godet, N

    N. Godet, N. Tzvetkov, Strichartz estimates for the periodic non-elliptic Schr¨ odinger equation , C. R. Math. 350 (2012), no. 21-22, 955–958

    2012

  28. [35]

    Gr¨ unrock, S

    A. Gr¨ unrock, S. Herr,Low regularity local well-posedness of the derivative nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with periodic initial data , SIAM J. Math. Anal. 39 (2008), no. 6, 1890–1920

    2008

  29. [36]

    Gr¨ unrock, L

    A. Gr¨ unrock, L. Vega,Local well-posedness for the modified KdV equation in almost critical cH sr -spaces, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 361 (2009), no. 11, 5681–5694. 30 E. BAS ¸AKO ˘GLU, T. OH, AND Y. W ANG

    2009

  30. [37]

    Gubinelli, G

    M. Gubinelli, G. Li, J. Li, T. Oh, Nonlinear PDEs with modulated dispersion IV: normal form approach and unconditional uniqueness , arXiv:2505.24270 [math.AP]

  31. [38]

    Gubinelli, H

    M. Gubinelli, H. Koch, Paracontrolled approach to the three-dimensional stochastic nonlinear wave equa- tion with quadratic nonlinearity , J. Eur. Math. Soc. 26 (2024), no. 3, 817–874

    2024

  32. [39]

    Z. Guo, T. Oh, Non-existence of solutions for the periodic cubic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation belowL2, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2018 (2018), no. 6, 1656–1729

    2018

  33. [40]

    Z. Guo, S. Kwon, T. Oh, Poincar´ e-Dulac normal form reduction for unconditional well-posedness of the periodic cubic NLS , Commun. Math. Phys. 322 (2013), no. 1, 19–48

    2013

  34. [41]

    Hairer, A theory of regularity structures , Invent

    M. Hairer, A theory of regularity structures , Invent. Math. 198 (2014), no. 2, 269–504

    2014

  35. [42]

    S. Herr, B. Kwak, Strichartz estimates and global well-posedness of the cubic NLS on T2, Forum Math. Pi 12 (2024), Paper No. e14, 21 pp

    2024

  36. [43]

    S. Herr, B. Kwak, Global well-posedness of the cubic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation on T2, arXiv:2502.17073 [math.AP]

    arXiv

  37. [44]

    S. Herr, V. Sohinger, Unconditional uniqueness results for the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Commun. Contemp. Math. 21 (2019), no. 7, 28 pp

    2019

  38. [45]

    Kappeler, P

    T. Kappeler, P. Topalov, Global wellposedness of KdV in H −1(T, R), Duke Math. J. 135 (2006), no. 2, 327–360

    2006

  39. [46]

    Kato, On nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations, II.H s-solutions and unconditional well-posedness, J

    T. Kato, On nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations, II.H s-solutions and unconditional well-posedness, J. Anal. Math. 67 (1995), 281–306

    1995

  40. [47]

    Kenig, A

    C. Kenig, A. Nahmod, The Cauchy problem for the hyperbolic-elliptic Ishimori system and Schr¨ odinger maps, Nonlinearity 18 (2005), no. 5, 1987–2009

    2005

  41. [48]

    Killip, O

    R. Killip, O. Pocovnicu, T. Oh, M. Vi¸ san,Global well-posedness of the Gross-Pitaevskii and cubic-quintic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations with non-vanishing boundary conditions, Math. Res. Lett. 19 (2012), no. 5, 969–986

    2012

  42. [49]

    Killip, M

    R. Killip, M. Vi¸ san,KdV is well-posed in H −1, Ann. of Math. 190 (2019), no. 1, 249–305

    2019

  43. [50]

    Kishimoto, Remark on the periodic mass critical nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation , Proc

    N. Kishimoto, Remark on the periodic mass critical nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation , Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 142 (2014), no. 8, 2649–2660

    2014

  44. [51]

    Kishimoto, A remark on norm inflation for nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations , Commun

    N. Kishimoto, A remark on norm inflation for nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations , Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 18 (2019), no. 3, 1375–1402

    2019

  45. [52]

    Kishimoto, Unconditional local well-posedness for periodic NLS , J

    N. Kishimoto, Unconditional local well-posedness for periodic NLS , J. Differential Equations 274 (2021), 766–787

    2021

  46. [53]

    Kishimoto, Unconditional uniqueness of solutions for nonlinear dispersive equations , arXiv:1911.04349 [math.AP]

    N. Kishimoto, Unconditional uniqueness of solutions for nonlinear dispersive equations , arXiv:1911.04349 [math.AP]

    1911 arXiv

  47. [54]

    S. Kwon, T. Oh, On unconditional well-posedness of modified KdV , Int. Math. Res. Not. (2012), no. 15, 3509–3534

    2012

  48. [55]

    Mizutani, N

    H. Mizutani, N. Tzvetkov, Strichartz estimates for non-elliptic Schr¨ odinger equations on compact mani- folds, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 40 (2015), no. 6, 1182–1195

    2015

  49. [56]

    Mo¸ sincat, D

    R. Mo¸ sincat, D. Pilod, Unconditional uniqueness for the Benjamin-Ono equation , Pure Appl. Anal. 5 (2023), no. 2, 285–322

    2023

  50. [57]

    Oh, Note on a lower bound of the Weyl sum in Bourgain ’s paper (GAF A ’93) http://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/∼toh

    T. Oh, Note on a lower bound of the Weyl sum in Bourgain ’s paper (GAF A ’93) http://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/∼toh

  51. [58]

    Oh, A remark on norm inflation with general initial data for the cubic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations in negative Sobolev spaces , Funkcial

    T. Oh, A remark on norm inflation with general initial data for the cubic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations in negative Sobolev spaces , Funkcial. Ekvac. 60 (2017) 259–277

    2017

  52. [59]

    T. Oh, M. Okamoto, N. Tzvetkov, Uniqueness and non-uniqueness of the Gaussian free field evolution under the two-dimensional Wick ordered cubic wave equation , Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Probab. Stat. 60 (2024), no. 3, 1684–1728

    2024

  53. [60]

    T. Oh, K. Seong, Quasi-invariant Gaussian measures for the cubic fourth order nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation in negative Sobolev spaces , J. Funct. Anal. 281 (2021), no. 9, 109150, 49 pp

    2021

  54. [61]

    T. Oh, P. Sosoe, N. Tzvetkov, An optimal regularity result on the quasi-invariant Gaussian measures for the cubic fourth order nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, J. ´Ec. polytech. Math. 5 (2018), 793–841

    2018

  55. [62]

    T. Oh, P. Sosoe, Y. Wang, Unconditional well-posedness of the stochastic Korteweg-de Vries equation with an additive noise , preprint

  56. [63]

    T. Oh, N. Tzvetkov, Quasi-invariant Gaussian measures for the cubic fourth order nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Probab. Theory Related Fields 169 (2017), 1121–1168

    2017

  57. [64]

    T. Oh, Y. Wang, Global well-posedness of the periodic cubic fourth order NLS in negative Sobolev spaces , Forum Math. Sigma 6 (2018), e5, 80 pp. HYPERBOLIC NLS 31

    2018

  58. [65]

    T. Oh, Y. Wang, Global well-posedness of the one-dimensional cubic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation in almost critical spaces, J. Differential Equations 269 (2020), no. 1, 612–640

    2020

  59. [66]

    T. Oh, Y. Wang, Normal form approach to the one-dimensional periodic cubic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation in almost critical Fourier–Lebesgue spaces , J. Anal. Math. 143 (2021), no. 2, 723–762

    2021

  60. [67]

    T. Oh, Y. Wang, Revisiting Bourgain ’s probabilistic construction of solutions to the 2-d cubic NLS , arXiv:2505.24271 [math.AP]

    arXiv

  61. [68]

    J.-C. Saut, Y. Wang, On the hyperbolic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations, Adv. Cont. Discr. Mod. (2024), no. 1, 15 pp

    2024

  62. [69]

    Shatah, Normal forms and quadratic nonlinear Klein-Gordon equations , Comm

    J. Shatah, Normal forms and quadratic nonlinear Klein-Gordon equations , Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 38 (1985), no. 5, 685–696

    1985

  63. [70]

    Taira, Strichartz estimates for non-degenerate Schr¨ odinger equations, Math

    K. Taira, Strichartz estimates for non-degenerate Schr¨ odinger equations, Math. Nachr. 293 (2020), no. 4, 774–793

    2020

  64. [71]

    Takaoka, Y

    H. Takaoka, Y. Tsutsumi, Well-posedness of the Cauchy problem for the modified KdV equation with periodic boundary condition, Int. Math. Res. Not. (2004), no. 56, 3009–3040

    2004

  65. [72]

    Takaoka, N

    H. Takaoka, N. Tzvetkov, On 2D nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations with data on R × T, J. Funct. Anal. 182 (2001), 427–442

    2001

  66. [73]

    Totz, A justification of the modulation approximation to the 3D full water wave problem , Comm

    N. Totz, A justification of the modulation approximation to the 3D full water wave problem , Comm. Math. Phys. 335 (2015), no. 1, 369–443

    2015

  67. [74]

    N. Totz, S. Wu, A rigorous justification of the modulation approximation to the 2D full water wave problem, Comm. Math. Phys. 310 (2012), no. 2, 817–883

    2012

  68. [76]

    Y.Y.S. Win, Y. Tsutsumi, Unconditional uniqueness of solution for the Cauchy problem of the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Hokkaido Math. J. 37 (2008), no. 4, 839–859. Engin Bas ¸ako˘glu, Institute of Mathematical Sciences, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, 201210, China E...

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.