pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.01940 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-02 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Magnetic-free optical mode degeneracy lifting in lithium niobate microring resonators

Xin-Biao Xu , Zheng-Xu Zhu , Yuan-Hao Yang , Jia-Qi Wang , Yu Zeng , Jia-Hua Zou , Juanjuan Lu , Yan-Lei Zhang
show 4 more authors
Weiting Wang Guang-Can Guo Luyan Sun Chang-Ling Zou
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 20:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords acousto-optic couplingmicroring resonatornon-reciprocitymode degeneracylithium niobateoptical isolationpiezoelectric transducerAC Stark shift
0
0 comments X

The pith

Coherent acousto-optic coupling generates differential AC Stark shifts that lift degeneracy between counter-propagating modes in microring resonators.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that exciting piezoelectric transducers in lithium niobate microrings produces coherent acousto-optic coupling, which creates differential AC Stark shifts between forward and backward propagating fundamental optical modes. This directly lifts their degeneracy and produces non-reciprocal behavior. A reader would care because the method works with ordinary microrings and fundamental modes, removing the need for intermodal conversion or elaborate photonic engineering. It also provides electrical control and works across a wide wavelength range through its linear dependence on acoustic power.

Core claim

Phonon-induced non-reciprocity arises from direct lifting of forward-backward mode degeneracy in microring resonators. Coherent acousto-optic coupling generates differential AC Stark shifts between counter-propagating fundamental optical modes. Simple microwave excitation of integrated piezoelectric transducers provides dynamic control, with demonstrated mode splitting exceeding twice the optical linewidth and a linear relationship to acoustic power.

What carries the argument

Differential AC Stark shifts induced by coherent acousto-optic coupling on counter-propagating fundamental modes in a microring resonator.

Load-bearing premise

The splitting is caused solely by phonon-induced differential AC Stark shifts on the fundamental modes through the piezoelectric transducers.

What would settle it

Observation of comparable splitting when the acoustic drive is turned off or when the frequency is far from the acoustic resonance would falsify the acousto-optic mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.01940 by Chang-Ling Zou, Guang-Can Guo, Jia-Hua Zou, Jia-Qi Wang, Juanjuan Lu, Luyan Sun, Weiting Wang, Xin-Biao Xu, Yan-Lei Zhang, Yuan-Hao Yang, Yu Zeng, Zheng-Xu Zhu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (b) shows the typical transmission spectra with an optical wavelength at around 1561nm and the corresponding fitting results. When acoustic pumping is off (Pa = 0), as a result of optical reciprocity, the CW and CCW modes show identical spectra with a single Lorentzian resonance dip, i.e., the two modes have the same resonant frequency (ω0), in￾trinsic loss, and the external coupling rate to the bus waveg￾… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a). A maximum isolation of 45 dB under an acous￾tic drive power of Pa = 5.7dBm is achieved. Note that this power is critical and the optimal isolation contrast is achieved when the critical coupling condition is achieved [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Breaking time-reversal symmetry in integrated photonics without magnetic fields remains a fundamental challenge. We demonstrate phonon-induced non-reciprocity through direct lifting of forward-backward mode degeneracy in microring resonators. Coherent acousto-optic coupling generates differential AC Stark shifts between counter-propagating fundamental optical modes, eliminating the need for intermodal conversion or complex photonic structures. Simple microwave excitation of integrated piezoelectric transducers provides dynamic control of non-reciprocal response, with experimentally demonstrated mode splitting exceeding twice the optical linewidth. The linear relationship between the splitting and acoustic power enables real-time reconfigurability across a wide range of optical wavelengths. This mechanism requires only simple microring resonators and fundamental optical modes, transforming non-reciprocity from a specialized technique requiring careful modal engineering to a universal, electrically-controlled functionality. Our approach establishes a new paradigm for magnetic-free optical isolation and dynamic topological photonics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to demonstrate magnetic-free lifting of degeneracy between counter-propagating fundamental optical modes in lithium niobate microring resonators via coherent acousto-optic coupling. Integrated piezoelectric transducers driven by microwaves generate phonons that induce differential AC Stark shifts, producing mode splitting that scales linearly with acoustic power and exceeds twice the optical linewidth, without requiring intermodal conversion or specialized photonic structures.

Significance. If the observed splitting is shown to arise purely from the phonon-induced mechanism rather than direct electro-optic effects, the result would simplify non-reciprocal functionality to standard microrings and fundamental modes, enabling electrically reconfigurable isolation and topological photonics across broad wavelength ranges.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.2] §4.2 (Experimental characterization): No control measurement is reported in which the transducer is driven off the acoustic resonance (or with the acoustic path mechanically damped) while maintaining the same RF voltage; such a test is required to bound the direct electro-optic contribution to the observed splitting, given LN's large r33 coefficient and the presence of RF fields from the same electrodes.
  2. [Eq. (2)] Eq. (2) and surrounding theory: The expression for the differential AC Stark shift is derived under the assumption of purely coherent acousto-optic interaction; the manuscript does not compare the predicted magnitude against the expected EO shift for the measured RF field amplitude inside the resonator, leaving the attribution to phonons unquantified.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 4] Figure 4: The optical linewidth value used to normalize the splitting should be stated explicitly in the caption or text, together with the measured Q-factor and its uncertainty.
  2. [§3.1] §3.1: The definition of acoustic power delivered to the transducer should include the measured S11 and the conversion efficiency to avoid ambiguity in the reported linear scaling.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. The comments correctly identify the need for stronger quantitative separation between phonon-induced acousto-optic effects and direct electro-optic contributions. We have revised the manuscript to incorporate a direct magnitude comparison and additional discussion of the RF-field dependence. These changes strengthen the attribution to the coherent acousto-optic mechanism without altering the central claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4.2] No control measurement is reported in which the transducer is driven off the acoustic resonance (or with the acoustic path mechanically damped) while maintaining the same RF voltage; such a test is required to bound the direct electro-optic contribution to the observed splitting, given LN's large r33 coefficient and the presence of RF fields from the same electrodes.

    Authors: We agree that an off-resonance drive or mechanical damping experiment at fixed RF voltage would provide the most direct experimental bound. Our present devices do not incorporate a separate damping mechanism, and repeating the full measurement series off-resonance was not performed in the original campaign. In the revised manuscript we have added a quantitative estimate of the direct EO splitting using the measured RF voltage amplitude, the known r33 coefficient, and the overlap integral between the optical mode and the RF electric field. This calculation shows the EO contribution remains at least an order of magnitude below the observed splitting. We further note that the splitting appears only when the drive frequency coincides with the acoustic resonance and scales linearly with acoustic power (Fig. 3), behaviors inconsistent with a voltage-dependent EO shift that would persist off resonance. We therefore consider the revised analysis sufficient to support the phonon-induced interpretation, while acknowledging that a dedicated control measurement would be desirable in follow-on work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Eq. (2) and surrounding theory: The expression for the differential AC Stark shift is derived under the assumption of purely coherent acousto-optic interaction; the manuscript does not compare the predicted magnitude against the expected EO shift for the measured RF field amplitude inside the resonator, leaving the attribution to phonons unquantified.

    Authors: We have added to the revised manuscript (immediately following Eq. (2)) an explicit order-of-magnitude comparison between the predicted differential AC Stark shift arising from the coherent acousto-optic interaction and the direct EO shift calculated from the RF electric-field amplitude inside the resonator. Using the measured RF voltage, the electrode geometry, and the optical-mode overlap, the EO-induced frequency shift is shown to be negligible relative to the observed splitting. This comparison is now presented both analytically and with numerical values extracted from the experimental parameters, thereby quantifying the dominance of the phonon-mediated mechanism. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Experimental linear splitting with acoustic power provides independent support; no definitional reduction

full rationale

The paper's derivation of differential AC Stark shifts from coherent acousto-optic coupling follows standard perturbation theory for phonon-induced index modulation on counter-propagating modes in LN microrings. The central result is validated by direct experimental observation of splitting scaling linearly with acoustic power (exceeding 2x linewidth), rather than any fitted parameter or self-citation being renamed as a prediction. No equations reduce the observed splitting to the input model by construction, and the mechanism attribution relies on external benchmarks (piezoelectric transducer response, EO coefficients) that are not tautological with the target non-reciprocity claim. Minor self-citation risk exists in related prior work on LN acousto-optics but is not load-bearing for the uniqueness of the fundamental-mode approach.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests primarily on experimental demonstration of acousto-optic effects in lithium niobate rather than new theoretical constructs; standard domain assumptions about piezoelectric and acousto-optic interactions are invoked without additional free parameters or invented entities specified in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard acousto-optic and piezoelectric properties of lithium niobate enable coherent coupling between acoustic and optical modes.
    The mechanism assumes known material responses to microwave-driven acoustic waves without deriving them.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5724 in / 1234 out tokens · 36132 ms · 2026-05-18T20:26:24.419662+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Reciprocity in optics,

    R. J. Potton, “Reciprocity in optics,” Reports on Progress in Physics 67, 717 (2004)

    work page 2004

  2. [2]

    Electromagnetic Nonreciprocity,

    C. Caloz, A. Al `u, S. Tretyakov, D. Sounas, K. Achouri, and Z.-L. Deck-L´eger, “Electromagnetic Nonreciprocity,” Physical Review Applied 10, 047001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    What is - and what is not - an optical isolator,

    D. Jalas, A. Petrov, M. Eich, W. Freude, S. Fan, Z. Yu, R. Baets, M. Popovi ´c, A. Melloni, J. D. Joannopoulos, M. Vanwol- leghem, C. R. Doerr, and H. Renner, “What is - and what is not - an optical isolator,” Nature Photonics7, 579 (2013)

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    Self-induced optical non- reciprocity,

    Z.-B. Wang, Y .-L. Zhang, X.-X. Hu, G.-J. Chen, M. Li, P.- F. Yang, X.-B. Zou, P.-F. Zhang, C.-H. Dong, G. Li, T.-C. Zhang, G.-C. Guo, and C.-L. Zou, “Self-induced optical non- reciprocity,” Light: Science & Applications 14, 23 (2025)

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Topological pho- tonics,

    L. Lu, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Solja ˇci´c, “Topological pho- tonics,” Nature Photonics8, 821 (2014)

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    Robust optical delay lines with topological protection,

    M. Hafezi, E. A. Demler, M. D. Lukin, and J. M. Taylor, “Robust optical delay lines with topological protection,” Nature Physics 7, 907 (2011)

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    Ob- servation of unidirectional backscattering-immune topological electromagnetic states,

    Z. Wang, Y . Chong, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljaˇci´c, “Ob- servation of unidirectional backscattering-immune topological electromagnetic states,” Nature461, 772 (2009)

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    Noiseless photonic non-reciprocity via optically-induced magnetization,

    X.-X. Hu, Z.-B. Wang, P. Zhang, G.-J. Chen, Y .-L. Zhang, G. Li, X.-B. Zou, T. Zhang, H. X. Tang, C.-H. Dong, G.-C. Guo, and C.-L. Zou, “Noiseless photonic non-reciprocity via optically-induced magnetization,” Nature Communications 12, 2389 (2021)

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    On-chip optical isolation in monolithically integrated non-reciprocal optical resonators,

    L. Bi, J. Hu, P. Jiang, D. H. Kim, G. F. Dionne, L. C. Kimerling, and C. A. Ross, “On-chip optical isolation in monolithically integrated non-reciprocal optical resonators,” Nature Photonics 5, 758 (2011)

    work page 2011

  10. [10]

    Magneto-optical chiral metasurfaces for achieving polarization-independent nonreciprocal transmission,

    W. Li, Q. Yang, O. You, C. Lu, F. Guan, J. Liu, J. Shi, and S. Zhang, “Magneto-optical chiral metasurfaces for achieving polarization-independent nonreciprocal transmission,” Science Advances 10, eadm7458 (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Magneto-optical non-reciprocal devices in silicon photonics,

    Y . Shoji and T. Mizumoto, “Magneto-optical non-reciprocal devices in silicon photonics,” Science and Technology of Ad- vanced Materials 15, 014602 (2014)

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    Integrated non- reciprocal magneto-optics with ultra-high endurance for pho- tonic in-memory computing,

    P. Pintus, M. Dumont, V . Shah, T. Murai, Y . Shoji, D. Huang, G. Moody, J. E. Bowers, and N. Youngblood, “Integrated non- reciprocal magneto-optics with ultra-high endurance for pho- tonic in-memory computing,” Nature Photonics19, 54 (2025)

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Experimental realization of optomechanically induced non-reciprocity,

    Z. Shen, Y .-L. Zhang, Y . Chen, C.-L. Zou, Y .-F. Xiao, X.-B. Zou, F.-W. Sun, G.-C. Guo, and C.-H. Dong, “Experimental realization of optomechanically induced non-reciprocity,” Na- ture Photonics 10, 657 (2016)

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    Nonre- ciprocity and magnetic-free isolation based on optomechanical interactions,

    F. Ruesink, M.-A. Miri, A. Al `u, and E. Verhagen, “Nonre- ciprocity and magnetic-free isolation based on optomechanical interactions,” Nature Communications7, 13662 (2016)

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    Optical Nonreciprocity Based on Optomechanical Coupling,

    M.-A. Miri, F. Ruesink, E. Verhagen, and A. Al `u, “Optical Nonreciprocity Based on Optomechanical Coupling,” Physical Review Applied 7, 064014 (2017)

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    Generalized non-reciprocity in an optomechanical circuit via synthetic magnetism and reservoir engineering,

    K. Fang, J. Luo, A. Metelmann, M. H. Matheny, F. Marquardt, A. A. Clerk, and O. Painter, “Generalized non-reciprocity in an optomechanical circuit via synthetic magnetism and reservoir engineering,” Nature Physics13, 465 (2017)

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    Optomechanically induced non- reciprocity in microring resonators,

    M. Hafezi and P. Rabl, “Optomechanically induced non- reciprocity in microring resonators,” Optics Express 20, 7672 (2012)

    work page 2012

  18. [18]

    Limitations of nonlinear optical isolators due to dynamic reciprocity,

    Y . Shi, Z. Yu, and S. Fan, “Limitations of nonlinear optical isolators due to dynamic reciprocity,” Nature Photonics 9, 388 (2015)

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    Cavity-Free Optical Isolators 6 and Circulators Using a Chiral Cross-Kerr Nonlinearity,

    K. Xia, F. Nori, and M. Xiao, “Cavity-Free Optical Isolators 6 and Circulators Using a Chiral Cross-Kerr Nonlinearity,” Phys- ical Review Letters 121, 203602 (2018)

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    Nanoscale optical nonreciprocity with nonlinear meta- surfaces,

    A. Tripathi, C. F. Ugwu, V . S. Asadchy, I. Faniayeu, I. Kravchenko, S. Fan, Y . Kivshar, J. Valentine, and S. S. Kruk, “Nanoscale optical nonreciprocity with nonlinear meta- surfaces,” Nature Communications15, 5077 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Integrated passive nonlinear optical isolators,

    A. D. White, G. H. Ahn, K. V . Gasse, K. Y . Yang, L. Chang, J. E. Bowers, and J. Vu ˇckovi´c, “Integrated passive nonlinear optical isolators,” Nature Photonics17, 143 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Complete optical isolation created by in- direct interband photonic transitions,

    Z. Yu and S. Fan, “Complete optical isolation created by in- direct interband photonic transitions,” Nature Photonics 3, 91 (2009)

    work page 2009

  23. [23]

    Electrically Driven Nonreciprocity Induced by Interband Photonic Transition on a Silicon Chip,

    H. Lira, Z. Yu, S. Fan, and M. Lipson, “Electrically Driven Nonreciprocity Induced by Interband Photonic Transition on a Silicon Chip,” Physical Review Letters109, 033901 (2012)

    work page 2012

  24. [24]

    Magnetic- free non-reciprocity and isolation based on parametrically mod- ulated coupled-resonator loops,

    N. A. Estep, D. L. Sounas, J. Soric, and A. Al `u, “Magnetic- free non-reciprocity and isolation based on parametrically mod- ulated coupled-resonator loops,” Nature Physics10, 923 (2014)

    work page 2014

  25. [25]

    Non-reciprocal photonics based on time modulation,

    D. L. Sounas and A. Al `u, “Non-reciprocal photonics based on time modulation,” Nature Photonics11, 774 (2017)

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    Magnetic-free silicon nitride integrated optical isolator,

    H. Tian, J. Liu, A. Siddharth, R. N. Wang, T. Bl´esin, J. He, T. J. Kippenberg, and S. A. Bhave, “Magnetic-free silicon nitride integrated optical isolator,” Nature Photonics15, 828 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    Thermal-motion-induced non-reciprocal quantum optical sys- tem,

    S. Zhang, Y . Hu, G. Lin, Y . Niu, K. Xia, J. Gong, and S. Gong, “Thermal-motion-induced non-reciprocal quantum optical sys- tem,” Nature Photonics12, 744 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Realization of Nonlinear Op- tical Nonreciprocity on a Few-Photon Level Based on Atoms Strongly Coupled to an Asymmetric Cavity,

    P. Yang, X. Xia, H. He, S. Li, X. Han, P. Zhang, G. Li, P. Zhang, J. Xu, Y . Yang, and T. Zhang, “Realization of Nonlinear Op- tical Nonreciprocity on a Few-Photon Level Based on Atoms Strongly Coupled to an Asymmetric Cavity,” Physical Review Letters 123, 233604 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    Non- reciprocal Amplification with Four-Level Hot Atoms,

    G. Lin, S. Zhang, Y . Hu, Y . Niu, J. Gong, and S. Gong, “Non- reciprocal Amplification with Four-Level Hot Atoms,” Physical Review Letters 123, 033902 (2019)

    work page 2019

  30. [30]

    Chirality-induced quantum non-reciprocity,

    Z. Zhang, Z. Xu, R. Huang, X. Lu, F. Zhang, D. Li, ? K. ¨Ozdemir, F. Nori, H. Bao, Y . Xiao, B. Chen, H. Jing, and H. Shen, “Chirality-induced quantum non-reciprocity,” Nature Photonics 19, 840 (2025)

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    Nonreciprocity and Quantum Correlations of Light Transport in Hot Atoms via Reservoir Engineering,

    X. Lu, W. Cao, W. Yi, H. Shen, and Y . Xiao, “Nonreciprocity and Quantum Correlations of Light Transport in Hot Atoms via Reservoir Engineering,” Physical Review Letters 126, 223603 (2021)

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    Non- reciprocal Brillouin scattering induced transparency,

    J. Kim, M. C. Kuzyk, K. Han, H. Wang, and G. Bahl, “Non- reciprocal Brillouin scattering induced transparency,” Nature Physics 11, 275 (2015)

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    Brillouin-scattering-induced transparency and non- reciprocal light storage,

    C.-H. Dong, Z. Shen, C.-L. Zou, Y .-L. Zhang, W. Fu, and G.- C. Guo, “Brillouin-scattering-induced transparency and non- reciprocal light storage,” Nature Communications 6, 6193 (2015)

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    Non-reciprocal interband Brillouin modulation,

    E. A. Kittlaus, N. T. Otterstrom, P. Kharel, S. Gertler, and P. T. Rakich, “Non-reciprocal interband Brillouin modulation,” Na- ture Photonics 12, 613 (2018)

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    Electromechanical Brillouin scat- tering in integrated optomechanical waveguides,

    Q. Liu, H. Li, and M. Li, “Electromechanical Brillouin scat- tering in integrated optomechanical waveguides,” Optica6, 778 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    Optomechanical ring resonator for efficient microwave- optical frequency conversion,

    I.-T. Chen, B. Li, S. Lee, S. Chakravarthi, K.-M. Fu, and M. Li, “Optomechanical ring resonator for efficient microwave- optical frequency conversion,” Nature Communications 14, 7594 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Electrically driven opti- cal isolation through phonon-mediated photonic Autler-Townes splitting,

    D. B. Sohn, O. E. ¨Orsel, and G. Bahl, “Electrically driven opti- cal isolation through phonon-mediated photonic Autler-Townes splitting,” Nature Photonics15, 822 (2021)

    work page 2021

  38. [38]

    Electrically driven acousto- optics and broadband non-reciprocity in silicon photonics,

    E. A. Kittlaus, W. M. Jones, P. T. Rakich, N. T. Otterstrom, R. E. Muller, and M. Rais-Zadeh, “Electrically driven acousto- optics and broadband non-reciprocity in silicon photonics,” Na- ture Photonics 15, 43 (2021)

    work page 2021

  39. [39]

    Direction reconfigurable nonrecipro- cal acousto-optic modulator on chip,

    D. B. Sohn and G. Bahl, “Direction reconfigurable nonrecipro- cal acousto-optic modulator on chip,” APL Photonics4, 126103 (2019)

    work page 2019

  40. [40]

    Nonreciprocal Dissipation Engineering via Strong Coupling with a Continuum of Modes,

    Y . Zhou, F. Ruesink, S. Gertler, H. Cheng, M. Pavlovich, E. Kit- tlaus, A. L. Starbuck, A. J. Leenheer, A. T. Pomerene, D. C. Trotter, C. Dallo, K. M. Musick, E. Garcia, R. Reyna, A. L. Holterhoff, M. Gehl, A. Kodigala, J. Bowers, M. Eichenfield, N. T. Otterstrom, A. L. Lentine, and P. Rakich, “Nonreciprocal Dissipation Engineering via Strong Coupling wi...

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    On-chip inter-modal Brillouin scattering,

    E. A. Kittlaus, N. T. Otterstrom, and P. T. Rakich, “On-chip inter-modal Brillouin scattering,” Nature Communications 8, 15819 (2017)

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    Time-reversal symmetry breaking with acoustic pumping of nanophotonic circuits,

    D. B. Sohn, S. Kim, and G. Bahl, “Time-reversal symmetry breaking with acoustic pumping of nanophotonic circuits,” Na- ture Photonics 12, 91 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    Integrated- waveguide-based acousto-optic modulation with complete op- tical conversion,

    L. Zhang, C. Cui, P.-K. Chen, and L. Fan, “Integrated- waveguide-based acousto-optic modulation with complete op- tical conversion,” Optica11, 184 (2024)

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    AC Stark shift of atomic en- ergy levels,

    N. B. Delone and V . P. Krainov, “AC Stark shift of atomic en- ergy levels,” Physics-Uspekhi42, 669 (1999)

    work page 1999

  45. [45]

    See the Supplemental Materials for details about the device, fabrications, and theoretical derivations

    work page

  46. [46]

    Stim- ulated Brillouin interaction between guided phonons and pho- tons in a lithium niobate waveguide,

    Y .-H. Yang, J.-Q. Wang, Z.-X. Zhu, X.-B. Xu, Q. Zhang, J. Lu, Y . Zeng, C.-H. Dong, L. Sun, G.-C. Guo, and C.-L. Zou, “Stim- ulated Brillouin interaction between guided phonons and pho- tons in a lithium niobate waveguide,” Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 67, 214221 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    Cross- Polarized Stimulated Brillouin Scattering in Lithium Niobate Waveguides,

    C. C. Rodrigues, N. J. Schilder, R. O. Zurita, L. S. Mag- alh˜aes, A. Shams-Ansari, F. J. L. dos Santos, O. M. Paiano, T. P. Alegre, M. Lon ˇcar, and G. S. Wiederhecker, “Cross- Polarized Stimulated Brillouin Scattering in Lithium Niobate Waveguides,” Physical Review Letters134, 113601 (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    Integrated Brillouin photonics in thin-film lithium niobate,

    K. Ye, H. Feng, R. te Morsche, C. Wei, Y . Klaver, A. Mishra, Z. Zheng, A. Keloth, A. Tarık Is ¸ık, Z. Chen, C. Wang, and D. Marpaung, “Integrated Brillouin photonics in thin-film lithium niobate,” Science Advances11, eadv4022 (2025)

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    On-Chip Brillouin Amplifier in Suspended Lithium Niobate Nanowaveguides,

    S. Yu, R. Zhou, G. Yang, Q. Zhang, H. Zhu, Y . Yang, X. Xu, B. Chen, C. Zou, and J. Lu, “On-Chip Brillouin Amplifier in Suspended Lithium Niobate Nanowaveguides,” Laser & Pho- tonics Reviews 19, 202500027 (2025)

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    Cross-polarized stim- ulated Brillouin scattering-empowered photonics,

    M. Nie, J. Musgrave, and S.-W. Huang, “Cross-polarized stim- ulated Brillouin scattering-empowered photonics,” Nature Pho- tonics 19, 585 (2025)

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    Giant Nonreciprocity and Gyration through Modulation-Induced Hatano-Nelson Coupling in Integrated Photonics,

    O. E. ¨Orsel, J. Noh, P. Zhu, J. Yim, T. L. Hughes, R. Thomale, and G. Bahl, “Giant Nonreciprocity and Gyration through Modulation-Induced Hatano-Nelson Coupling in Integrated Photonics,” Physical Review Letters134, 153801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    Tailorable stimulated Bril- louin scattering in nanoscale silicon waveguides,

    H. Shin, W. Qiu, R. Jarecki, J. A. Cox, R. H. Olsson, A. Star- buck, Z. Wang, and P. T. Rakich, “Tailorable stimulated Bril- louin scattering in nanoscale silicon waveguides,” Nature Com- munications 4, 1944 (2013)

    work page 1944

  53. [53]

    Brillouin integrated photonics,

    B. J. Eggleton, C. G. Poulton, P. T. Rakich, M. J. Steel, and G. Bahl, “Brillouin integrated photonics,” Nature Photonics13, 664 (2019). S1 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION CONTENTS Acknowledgments 5 References 5 I. Device Fabrication S2 II. The Interdigital Transducer S2 III. Guided Photonics and Phononic Modes S2 IV . Theory Derivation S3 S2 I. DEVICE FABRICAT...

    work page 2019