Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 41 references

Bending space-time wave packets

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Sculpting a pulse's spatiotemporal spectrum lets a symmetric beam's peak follow linear, quadratic, cubic, or square-root curves without diffraction.

desk verdict A clever experimental demonstration of bending STWPs with power-law trajectories, but the design algorithm's phase encoding has a derivative inconsistency and the trajectory fits are only qualitative. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.01950 v1 pith:4WXJFLWU submitted 2025-09-02 physics.optics

Layton A. Hall , Ayman F. Abouraddy This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords space-timewavepacketsbendingSTWPsself-acceleratingbeamsspatiotemporalspectrumpower-lawtrajectoriesangulardispersiondiffraction-freepropagationAiry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that by deviating from the one-wavelength-to-one-spatial-frequency rule that defines standard space-time wave packets, an optical pulse can be made to accelerate sideways along a prescribed power law. The resulting 'bending STWPs' keep a symmetric, diffraction-free transverse profile, so the curve of the trajectory is no longer tied to an asymmetric beam shape as it is for Airy beams. The authors demonstrate this experimentally for linear, quadratic, cubic, and square-root trajectories and report that the acceleration rate does not depend on the beam's spatial scale. This matters because it separates trajectory design from beam-profile design and suggests a route to steering light around line-of-sight obstacles.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the bending STWP's spectral support: instead of the intersection of the free-space light cone with a single tilted plane (a one-dimensional curve that enforces one spatial frequency per wavelength), the bending design uses a two-dimensional domain swept out by continuously rotating that tilted plane around the ω/c axis. The algorithm realizes this domain by assigning each wavelength a finite-bandwidth spatial spectrum k'_x(ω,z) that varies with axial position z, and uses the map xs/z ≈ k'_x/k'_z to place those frequencies on the SLM. The phase Φ(ω,xs) = k'_x(ω,xs)xs then encodes the trajectory. The same profile shape and scale are reused for every exponent, demonst

What would settle it

Encode a trajectory with a steep exponent or large total displacement, then measure the time-averaged intensity I(x,z) across the full designed range and fit the peak. If the measured peak deviates from x1(z/z1)^γ by more than the beam's transverse width near the end of the range—or if the (kx,λ) spectral projection fails to show the predicted finite-bandwidth spread at each wavelength—the xs≈z approximation is the point of failure.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is an algorithmic method for choosing the two-dimensional phase pattern on a spatial light modulator so that a space-time wave packet's spectral support on the light cone becomes a two-dimensional domain rather than a curve. Each wavelength is paired with a finite range of spatial frequencies, and each spatial-frequency component is placed at an SLM position that maps to an axial propagation distance through the approximate relation xs/z ≈ k'_x/k'_z. This effectively rotates the STWP's tilt direction continuously along z, making the time-averaged-intensity peak follow xo(z) = x1(z/z1)^γ for any positive exponent γ. Experiments with γ = 2, 3, and 0.5 show the intended cu

Load-bearing premise

The whole design hinges on the approximate mapping between a spatial-light-modulator coordinate and an axial propagation distance, xs/z ≈ k'_x/k'_z; if that mapping drifts for large transverse displacement or steeply curved trajectories, the measured peak will not follow the intended power law.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Self-accelerating beams no longer need an asymmetric profile; any symmetric, diffraction-free STWP profile can be bent, and the direction of curvature is set by the spectral tilt rather than by the beam shape.
  • The trajectory exponent γ can be chosen independently of beam scale and profile, so linear, quadratic, cubic, and fractional power laws are all reachable from the same apparatus by changing only the SLM phase.
  • Because the acceleration rate is decoupled from the transverse scale, one can shrink or expand the beam without changing how quickly it bends.
  • The method extends the STWP toolkit to combine axial acceleration and transverse bending, which the authors identify as a route to spatiotemporal self-acceleration.
  • Bending STWPs make line-of-sight target avoidance directly testable: a beam with a symmetric profile can be steered around an obstacle while preserving its transverse structure.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The xs/z ≈ k'_x/k'_z mapping suggests the algorithm should work for any monotonically increasing trajectory, not just power laws, by substituting an arbitrary xo(z); this extension is implicit but not tested in the paper.
  • The finite spectral bandwidth available per wavelength and the SLM pixel pitch impose a practical ceiling on how sharply a trajectory can bend, so a systematic error study across exponents and displacements would reveal where the mapping approximation breaks.
  • Since the transverse profile is preserved while the trajectory bends, spectral phase shaping could be layered on top to deliver a designed mode along a curved path—an experiment the paper's setup is already equipped to attempt.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports the experimental realization of 'bending space-time wave packets' (STWPs): pulsed beams with symmetric transverse profiles whose time-averaged intensity peak travels along curved trajectories of the form x_o(z)=x_1(z/z_1)^γ, with γ = 1, 2, 3, and 1/2 demonstrated. The design algorithm starts from a propagation-invariant STWP and rotates its spatiotemporal spectral support by a z-dependent angle, using the approximate mapping x_s/z ≈ k'_x/k'_z to convert axial position into the SLM coordinate x_s. The SLM phase is then set to Φ(ω,x_s)=k'_x(ω,x_s)x_s. Measured spatiotemporal spectra and time-averaged intensity profiles are presented for each power-law case. The paper claims that this approach yields self-accelerating beams with symmetric profiles and acceleration rates independent of the beam spatial scale.

Significance. If fully validated, the result would establish a new class of self-accelerating optical beams with three distinctive features: symmetric transverse profiles, arbitrary positive power-law trajectories (including fractional exponents), and acceleration controlled independently of the spatial scale of the beam. This goes beyond Airy beams and would be of interest for applications such as target avoidance and for fundamental studies of spatiotemporal wave-packet propagation. The experimental implementation is built on a mature STWP synthesis platform and the visual evidence for bending in several power-law cases is striking. However, the current manuscript lacks the quantitative trajectory analysis needed to substantiate the central claim, and the phase-encoding step in the design algorithm is described in a way that is internally questionable.

major comments (4)
  1. [Algorithm for designing the spatiotemporal spectral phase] The displayed phase is written as Φ(ω,x_s)=k'_x(ω,x_s)x_s. The local spatial frequency imparted by the SLM is ∂Φ/∂x_s = k'_x + x_s ∂k'_x/∂x_s, not k'_x. For the power-law trajectories used here, k'_x varies with x_s through the mapping x_s/z≈k'_x/k'_z. For example, for γ=2, k'_x∝x_s^{1/2} and ∂Φ/∂x_s=(3/2)k'_x; for γ=1/2, k'_x∝x_s^{-1} so Φ is constant across x_s and no z-dependent tilt is encoded. Unless the phase was actually computed as Φ=∫k'_x dx_s, or direct spectral measurements show that each x_s carries the intended k'_x, the realized k_x content cannot be inferred from the phase pattern. This is load-bearing because the claimed trajectories are generated by this step.
  2. [Measurement results] No extracted peak positions, trajectory fits, or residuals are provided for Fig. 4(c–e). The reader is shown target I(x,z) next to measured I(x,z), but the claimed quantitative agreement with x_o(z)=x_1(z/z_1)^γ is not established. Because the trajectory is directly encoded into the SLM phase, the observation of bending is not an independent test of a prediction; the scientific content is the transfer function from designed phase to realized trajectory. Please plot the measured x_o(z) for each case, overlay the target curve, and report fit parameters with uncertainties.
  3. [Algorithm for designing the spatiotemporal spectral phase] The mapping x_s/z≈k'_x/k'_z is cited to Refs. [26,27] but not derived or validated here. In the algorithm, k'_x(ω,z) appears on both sides of this mapping, so it is unclear how z is eliminated in favor of x_s without a self-consistent solution. The accuracy of the mapping is especially questionable for the large transverse displacements (x_1 up to 200 µm over z_1=40 mm) and for γ=1/2, where the local tilt angle diverges as z→0. Provide a derivation, a numerical test of the mapping against the designed k'_x, or a spectral measurement that directly verifies the encoded k'_x at each x_s.
  4. [Discussion] The abstract and conclusion claim that the acceleration rate is independent of the beam spatial scale, but no experiment varies the transverse profile scale while holding the trajectory fixed. The statement that 'these power laws are all associated with the same transverse profile shape and scale' does not demonstrate independence. Either add a comparison at different spatial scales or temper the claim to what is actually shown.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 4] The text for Fig. 4(d) says x_1=200 µm, while the caption says x_1=150 µm. Also, 'x_1(z)=x_1(z/z_1)^3' should read 'x_o(z)=x_1(z/z_1)^3'.
  2. [Algorithm] The expression for the propagation-invariant STWP phase is written as Φ(ω,x_s)=k_x(ω)x, but the spatial variable should be x_s for consistency.
  3. [Fig. 4] The third row is labeled 'target time-averaged intensity profile I(x,z)' but the method used to compute it from the designed spectrum is not stated. Please specify how the target intensity is calculated.
  4. [Notation] The symbol x_o is used for the profile center, but in the paragraph on tilted STWPs the trajectory is written as x_o(z)=z tan ϕ_o; later the text uses x_1(z) for the cubic trajectory. Please unify notation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the curved trajectories are explicitly chosen design inputs, not independent predictions, and the cited axial mapping is prior work rather than a fitted parameter.

full rationale

The paper's central experimental result is a realization of an inverse design. The desired trajectories x_o(z)=x_1(z/z_1)^gamma are selected as inputs, then the algorithm converts them into an SLM phase pattern through the approximate mapping x_s/z ~ k'_x/k'_z. The measured intensity profiles in Fig. 4 therefore confirm that the encoding pipeline works, not that a first-principles prediction from an unconstrained theory was independently verified. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction: x_1, z_1, gamma, theta, and Delta_lambda are all chosen a priori and not extracted from the data. The only load-bearing externally supplied element is the axial mapping, which is cited to the authors' own prior work [26,27] and not rederived here; this is a reproducibility/derivation gap that could affect correctness if the mapping is inaccurate, but it is not a circular reduction of the claimed result to its inputs. The skeptical technical concern that dPhi/dx_s = k'_x + x_s dk'_x/dx_s differs from k'_x is a potential modeling error, not a circularity. Overall, the paper does not claim to predict the trajectories from a theory that was fit to them; it demonstrates a synthesis method, so no circularity is established.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The trajectory is directly encoded into the spectral phase, so the observed power-law curves are not independent predictions; they are realizations of the design input. The method itself is the contribution, with the trajectory parameters (γ, x1, z1) as free design choices. The key unproved premise is the approximate SLM-position-to-axial-distance mapping.

free parameters (3)
  • Trajectory scaling x1 = 200 µm, 150 µm, or 100 µm depending on experiment
    Sets the transverse amplitude of xo(z) = x1(z/z1)^γ; chosen by the experimenter for each demonstration.
  • Trajectory scaling z1 = 40 mm
    Sets the axial scale of the trajectory; fixed at 40 mm in all demonstrations.
  • Power-law exponent γ = 2, 3, or 0.5
    Chosen to show integer and fractional power laws; the central claim is that any positive exponent works.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The STWP spectral support satisfies kz - ko = Ω/ev, with the spatiotemporal spectrum lying on the free-space light cone.
    This is the defining property of propagation-invariant STWPs from prior work (ref [13]); the paper builds all designs on it.
  • domain assumption The paraxial expression Ω/ωo = kx^2/(2ko^2(1 - cot θ)) for the STWP spectrum.
    Used to compute kx(ω) in the design algorithm; valid in the paraxial regime used in the experiments.
  • ad hoc to paper The mapping between SLM position xs and axial distance z is xs/z ≈ k'_x/k'_z.
    This approximate mapping is the core of the design algorithm and is referenced to refs [26,27] but not derived in this paper.
  • domain assumption The time-averaged intensity peak follows the trajectory xo(z) encoded in the spectral phase.
    The experiments rely on the time-averaged intensity, not on the instantaneous field, to define the trajectory. This is standard for STWP measurements but is an assumption about what constitutes 'the beam path'.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bending space-time wave packets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4WXJFLWU

@misc{pith2026250901950,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bending space-time wave packets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4WXJFLWU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.01950}
}
read the original abstract

Optical beams with certain asymmetric profiles, such as the Airy beam, can depart from rectilinear propagation and instead travel along curved (typically parabolic) trajectories. Here we show that sculpting the spatiotemporal spectrum of optical pulses yields self-accelerating beams that have symmetric profiles, remain diffraction-free, and travel along power-law curves with propagation distance having arbitrary positive exponent (integer or fractional). We build upon propagation-invariant space-time wave packets (STWPs), in which each spatial frequency is associated with a single wavelength. A linear tilt in the propagation path of an STWP is produced by a corresponding tilt in the spectral domain. A curved trajectory is then produced through locally changing the tilt direction along the propagation axis, which requires associating a prescribed finite-bandwidth spatial spectrum to each wavelength. Using this approach, we realize symmetric STWPs traveling along curved trajectories that follow linear, quadratic, cubic, or even square-root power laws with an acceleration rate that is independent of the beam spatial scale. These novel bending STWPs open new avenues for realizing target-avoidance with electromagnetic waves.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.01950 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a). The transverse profile is translated laterally with ax￾ial propagation along a parabolic trajectory while remaining self-similar. These self-accelerating beams have been used to produce curved channels in plasmas [6], to guide curved elec￾tric arcs around objects [7], and in microscopy [8, 9], among other possibilities [5, 10]. This unusual propagation behavior immediately suggests applications in laser target-… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Schematic of the setup for synthesizing STWPs. G: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) A propagation-invariant STWP. (b) A tilted STWP with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The first row displays the SLM phase distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    G. A. Siviloglou and D. N. Christodoulides, Accelerating finite energy Airy beams, Opt. Lett. 32, 979 (2007)

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    G. A. Siviloglou, J. Broky, A. Dogariu, and D. N. Christodoulides, Observation of accelerating Airy beams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 213901 (2007)

    work page 2007

  3. [3]

    Bandres, Accelerating beams, Opt

    M. Bandres, Accelerating beams, Opt. Lett. 34, 3791 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    J. A. Davis, M. J. Mitry, M. A. Bandres, and D. M. Cottrell, Observation of accelerating parabolic beams, Opt. Express 16, 12866 (2009)

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    N. K. Efremidis, Z. Chen, M. Segev, and D. N. Christodoulides, Airy beams and accelerating waves: an overview of recent ad- vances, Optica 6, 686 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Polynkin, M

    P. Polynkin, M. Kolesik, J. V . Moloney, G. A. Siviloglou, and D. N. Christodoulides, Curved plasma channel generation using ultra-intense Airy beams, Science 324, 229 (2009)

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Clerici, Y

    M. Clerici, Y . Hu, P. Lassonde, C. Mili ´an, A. Couairon, D. N. Christodoulides, Z. Chen, L. Razzari, F. Vidal, F. L ´egar´e, D. Faccio, and R. Morandotti, Laser-assisted guiding of elec- tric discharges around objects, Sci. Adv. 1, e1400111 (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Vettenburg, H

    T. Vettenburg, H. I. C. Dalgarno, J. Nylk, C. C.-Llad´o, D. E. K. Ferrier, T. ˇCiˇzm´ar, F. J. Gunn-Moore, and K. Dholakia, Light- sheet microscopy using an Airy beam, Nat. Meth. 11, 541 (2014). 5

    work page 2014

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    N. R. Subedi, S. Yaraghi, P. S. Jung, G. Kukal, A. G. McDon- ald, D. N. Christodoulides, and A. E. Vasdekis, Airy light-sheet Raman imaging, Opt. Express 29, 31941 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    Kaminer, J

    I. Kaminer, J. Nemirovsky, M. Rechtsman, R. Bekenstein, and M. Segev, Self-accelerating Dirac particles and prolonging the lifetime of relativistic fermions, Nat. Phys. 11, 261 (2015)

    2015

  3. [11]

    H. E. Kondakci and A. F. Abouraddy, Diffraction-free space- time light sheets, Nat. Photon. 11, 733 (2017)

    2017

  4. [12]

    Yessenov, Z

    M. Yessenov, Z. Chen, J. Free, E. G. Johnson, M. P. J. Lavery, M. A. Alonso, and A. F. Abouraddy, Space-time wave packets localized in all dimensions, Nat. Commun. 13, 4573 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    Yessenov, L

    M. Yessenov, L. A. Hall, K. L. Schepler, and A. F. Abouraddy, Space-time wave packets, Adv. Opt. Photon. 14, 455 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    L. J. Wong and I. Kaminer, Ultrashort tilted-pulsefront pulses and nonparaxial tilted-phase-front beams, ACS Photon.4, 2257 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    N. K. Efremidis, Spatiotemporal diffraction-free pulsed beams in free-space of the Airy and Bessel type, Opt. Lett. 42, 5038 (2017)

    2017

  8. [16]

    M. A. Porras, Diffraction-free and dispersion-free pulsed beam propagation in dispersive media, Opt. Lett. 26, 1364 (2001)

    2001

  9. [17]

    H. E. Kondakci and A. F. Abouraddy, Optical space-time wave packets of arbitrary group velocity in free space, Nat. Commun. 10, 929 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    Bhaduri, M

    B. Bhaduri, M. Yessenov, and A. F. Abouraddy, Anomalous re- fraction of optical spacetime wave packets, Nat. Photon.14, 416 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    H. E. Kondakci and A. F. Abouraddy, Self-healing of space- time light sheets, Opt. Lett. 43, 3830 (2018)

    2018

  12. [20]

    H. He, C. Guo, and M. Xiao, Nondispersive space–time wave packets propagating in dispersive media, Laser Photon. Rev.16, 2100634 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    L. A. Hall and A. F. Abouraddy, Canceling and inverting nor- mal and anomalous group-velocity dispersion using space-time wave packets, Laser Photon. Rev. 17, 2200119 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Clerici, D

    M. Clerici, D. Faccio, A. Lotti, E. Rubino, O. Jedrkiewicz, J. Biegert, and P. D. Trapani, Finite-energy, accelerating Bessel pulses, Opt. Express 16, 19807 (2008)

    2008

  15. [23]

    Yessenov and A

    M. Yessenov and A. F. Abouraddy, Accelerating and decelerat- ing space-time wave packets in free space, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 233901 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    Li and J

    Z. Li and J. Kawanaka, Velocity and acceleration freely tun- able straight-line propagation light bullet, Sci. Rep. 10, 11481 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    L. A. Hall, M. Yessenov, and A. F. Abouraddy, Arbitrarily ac- celerating space-time wave packets, Opt. Lett. 47, 694 (2022)

    2022

  18. [26]

    A. M. Allende Motz, M. Yessenov, and A. F. Abouraddy, Axial spectral encoding of space-time wave packets, Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 024067 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    L. A. Hall, M. Yessenov, M. A. Romer, and A. F. Abouraddy, Long-distance axial spectral encoding using space-time wave packets, Opt. Lett. 50, in press (2025)

    2025

  20. [28]

    Liang, Y

    Z. Liang, Y . Liu, Y . Luo, H. Chen, and D. Deng, Space-time wave packets with arbitrary transverse and longitudinal accel- erations, Opt. Lett. 48, 2543 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    L. A. Hall and A. F. Abouraddy, Universal angular-dispersion synthesizer, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 41, 83 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    M. A. Romer, L. A. Hall, and A. F. Abouraddy, Synthesis and characterization of space-time light sheets: a tutorial, J. Opt. 27, 013501 (2025)

    2025

  23. [31]

    H. E. Kondakci and A. F. Abouraddy, Airy wavepackets accel- erating in space-time, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 163901 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    L. J. Wong, Propagation-invariant space-time caustics of light, Opt. Express 29, 30682 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    Yessenov, B

    M. Yessenov, B. Bhaduri, H. E. Kondakci, M. Meem, R. Menon, and A. F. Abouraddy, Non-diffracting broadband in- coherent space-time fields, Optica 6, 598 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    Yessenov and A

    M. Yessenov and A. F. Abouraddy, Changing the speed of opti- cal coherence in free space, Opt. Lett. 44, 5125 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    Saari and K

    P. Saari and K. Reivelt, Generation and classification of local- ized waves by Lorentz transformations in Fourier space, Phys. Rev. E 69, 036612 (2004)

    2004

  28. [36]

    Longhi, Gaussian pulsed beams with arbitrary speed, Opt

    S. Longhi, Gaussian pulsed beams with arbitrary speed, Opt. Express 12, 935 (2004)

    2004

  29. [37]

    Yessenov and A

    M. Yessenov and A. F. Abouraddy, Relativistic transforma- tions of quasi-monochromatic optical beams, Phys. Rev. A107, 042221 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    Ramsey, A

    D. Ramsey, A. Di Piazza, M. Formanek, P. Franke, D. H. Froula, B. Malaca, W. B. Mori, J. R. Pierce, T. T. Simpson, J. Vieira, M. Vranic, K. Weichman, and J. P. Palastro, Exact solutions for the electromagnetic fields of a flying focus, Phys. Rev. A 107, 013513 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    L. A. Hall and A. F. Abouraddy, Observation of optical de Broglie-Mackinnon wave packets, Nat. Phys. 19, 435 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    Yessenov, M

    M. Yessenov, M. Romer, N. Ichiji, and A. F. Abouraddy, Exper- imental realization of lorentz boosts of space-time wave pack- ets, Phys. Rev. A 109, 013509 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    L. A. Hall, M. A. Romer, B. L. Turo, T. M. Hayward, R. Menon, and A. F. Abouraddy, Space-time wave packets propagating a kilometer in air, arXiv:2209.03309 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.