Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 90 references

Long-term evolution of the SN 2009ip-like transient SN 2016cvk

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that the +405-day spectrum of the interacting transient SN 2016cvk shows the forbidden oxygen doublet at 6300/6364 Å more prominently than any previous SN 2009ip-like event, pointing to a genuine core-collapse explosion ra

desk verdict A careful, data-rich study of a rare transient; the new late-time [O I] claim is plausible but rests on one low-S/N spectrum, so treat it as conditional. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.02125 v1 pith:GMHDASPA submitted 2025-09-02 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.HE

K. Matilainen , E. Kankare , S. Mattila , A. Reguitti , G. Pignata , J. Brimacombe , A. Pastorello , M. Fraser
show 16 more authors
S.J. Brennan J.P. Anderson B. Ayala-Inostroza R. Cartier P. Charalampopoulos T.-W. Chen M. Gromadzki C.P. Gutierrez C. Inserra T.E. Müller-Bravo M. Nicholl J.L. Prieto F. Ragosta T.M. Reynolds I. Salmaso D.R. Young
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.HE
keywords SN2016cvk2009ip-liketransientssupernovaimpostorsinteractingsupernovaeTypeIIn[OI]forbiddenlinesflashionisationcore-collapse
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

SN 2009ip-like transients sit on the dividing line between genuine supernovae and giant stellar eruptions, and their central question—did the star actually die?—has remained unsettled because interaction with surrounding gas overwhelms the spectral signatures of an explosion. This paper follows SN 2016cvk from its first archived outburst, roughly 1,200 days before peak, through two luminous events and out to +1,681 days, and argues that its +405-day spectrum shows the forbidden [O I] doublet at 6300/6364 Å: the canonical fingerprint of oxygen synthesised and ejected in a terminal core-collapse explosion. The authors present this as the most prominent late-time [O I] detection among SN 2009ip-like events and note that the +405-day spectrum resembles the firmly terminal interacting supernova SN 2010jl more than it does SN 2009ip itself. The paper also reports a 16-day flash-ionisation phase of He II, N III, and C III in the earliest spectra, which it uses to argue the progenitor was a red, yellow, or blue supergiant rather than a luminous blue variable. If the oxygen line is real, SN 2016cvk becomes a concrete case where the double-eruption behaviour of this class ended in an actual stellar explosion.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the forbidden [O I] doublet at 6300 and 6364 Å. In a supernova, this doublet is the standard late-time tracer of freshly nucleosynthesised oxygen: it requires the low densities and high temperatures of expanding ejecta, and it is not produced by the circumstellar interaction that otherwise lights up Type IIn spectra. Its presence at +405 d, at a FWHM of ~4700 km s⁻¹, is the paper's evidence that event B involved a real stellar disruption. The complementary machinery is the flash-ionisation blend of He II 4686, N III 4641, and C III 4650 Å seen in the earliest spectra—a short-lived recombination signature of extended, dense circumstellar gas—which the paper uses bot

What would settle it

A deep, high-signal-to-noise spectrum of SN 2016cvk taken now, at more than eight years past peak, that resolves the 6300/6364 Å doublet: a ratio approaching 3:1 with both components at matching FWHM would confirm genuine oxygen ejecta, while a persistent ~1.2 ratio together with the [Ni II] 7378/7412 Å doublet at similar width would show the 'oxygen' feature was contaminated and the terminal-explosion evidence drawn from it was an artefact of the fit.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central observational claim is that the +405 d spectrum of SN 2016cvk, obtained with the VLT, contains a feature at ~6300 Å identified as the forbidden [O I] doublet at 6300 and 6364 Å. A double-Gaussian fit gives a FWHM of ~4700 km s⁻¹ for both components, comparable to the intermediate-width ejecta components of the interacting supernova SN 1995N, and the paper interprets the line as possible evidence of nucleosynthesised oxygen—the classic late-time signature of a genuine core-collapse explosion embedded in circumstellar interaction. The authors place this in context: weak [O I] had been reported in SN 2009ip, SN 2016bdu, and SN 2016jbu, but in SN 2016cvk it is, to their knowl

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the faint ~6300 Å feature in the single, noisy +405 d spectrum is really the [O I] doublet: the measured 6300/6364 Å flux ratio is ~1.2 instead of the canonical 3:1, so the feature could be a blend with Fe II or [Ni II], in which case the evidence that SN 2016cvk ejected nucleosynthesised oxygen—and was therefore a terminal supernova—loses its footing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the [O I] identification holds, SN 2016cvk becomes the clearest example yet of a terminal explosion in the SN 2009ip-like family, strengthening the case that the event-A/event-B double-eruption pattern is pre-supernova activity of a doomed massive star.
  • Late-time spectroscopy becomes a decisive tool for this class: the +405 d observation shows that a single deep spectrum near +400 d can separate core-collapse from impostor scenarios better than light curves alone.
  • The flash-ionisation features lasting ~16 days imply an extended, dense circumstellar medium, and the abundance comparison favours a red, yellow, or blue supergiant progenitor—narrowing the mass-loss-history question for SN 2009ip-like systems.
  • The close resemblance of the late-time spectrum to SN 2010jl suggests SN 2009ip-like events and ordinary interacting Type IIn supernovae may form a continuum of massive-star explosions with varying circumstellar properties.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A deep, high-signal-to-noise spectrum at the present epoch—more than eight years past peak—could settle the oxygen identification: if the 6300/6364 Å ratio approaches 3:1, the nucleosynthesis claim moves from plausible to firm; a persistent ~1.2 ratio alongside [Ni II] 7378/7412 Å structure would favour a blend.
  • If confirmed, the [O I] flux could eventually be converted into a rough ejected-oxygen mass linking SN 2016cvk to core-collapse yield predictions, although the paper itself notes that collisional suppression blocks this path at present.
  • The same flash-ionisation diagnostic, applied to the precursor outbursts at roughly -1219, -700, and -440 d, could connect the duration of the ionised-CSM phase to the star's final mass-loss history, effectively mapping its last years onto its explosion.
  • The viewing-angle interpretation for the single-peaked Balmer lines implies a selection effect: SN 2009ip-like events viewed close to edge-on may be systematically harder to recognise, biasing the observed fraction of such events toward more pole-on geometries.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a long-term spectrophotometric study of SN 2016cvk, a SN 2009ip-like interacting transient, using UV, optical, and NIR data extending to +1681 d from the r-band maximum. The authors identify two luminous events (A and B), characterize the light-curve phases with analytic fits, model the blackbody evolution, and perform multi-component fits to the H-alpha and H-beta profiles. They report early flash-ionization features (C III, N III, He II) lasting 16 ± 5 d, and compare the event to other SN 2009ip-like transients. The main physical claim is that the late-time +405 d spectrum contains a [O I] 6300/6364 Å doublet, which they interpret as possible evidence of nucleosynthesised material from a terminal core-collapse explosion. The paper also discusses the lack of double-peaked Balmer lines, suggesting an edge-on CSM disc, and uses the flash-feature spectrum to argue for an RSG/YSG/BSG-like progenitor rather than an LBV.

Significance. If the [O I] identification is correct, this would be the most prominent late-time [O I] detection in a SN 2009ip-like event and would strengthen the terminal-explosion interpretation for this class. The paper's strengths are its extensive, well-calibrated dataset, the careful multi-component line fits (Tables A.7, A.8), the detection of flash features in SN 2016cvk and in previously unreported spectra of SN 2016jbu, and the transparent comparison with other SN 2009ip-like events. No circularity is apparent: the fitted blackbody, Fermi-Dirac, and line-profile parameters are descriptive and are compared to external models. The paper would be a valuable addition to the SN 2009ip-like literature even without the terminal-explosion claim, but the [O I] detection is the load-bearing step for the nucleosynthesis conclusion, and that step currently rests on a single low-S/N spectrum and an unresolved line fit.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sect. 4.6; Fig. 14] The terminal-explosion/nucleosynthesis conclusion rests on the identification of [O I] in the single +405 d VLT/FORS2 spectrum. The presented double-Gaussian fit cannot resolve the doublet: each component has FWHM=4700 km/s, while the 6300/6364 Å separation is only ~3050 km/s, so the two Gaussians are heavily blended and a single broad feature (or a blend of [Fe II]/[Ni II] lines) can reproduce the bump. The paper does not report a fit comparison (single vs double Gaussian), residual plots, or the S/N of the feature. The related claim that this is 'the most prominent detection' among SN 2009ip-like events is also made without quantitative equivalent-width or flux measurements of the comparison features. This needs to be substantiated or the claim demoted to tentative.
  2. [Sect. 4.6, line ratio and suppression] The measured flux ratio I(6300)/I(6364)=1.2 deviates strongly from the 3:1 ratio expected for optically thin [O I]. The paper attributes this to collisional suppression but gives no quantitative model. In a metal-rich, interaction-dominated CSM, Fe ii and [Ni ii] lines in this region are a plausible alternative; no fit was attempted with those species. Because the +82 d and +223 d spectra do not show the feature, the identification relies entirely on one epoch with subjective continuum subtraction. Please provide a quantitative treatment (e.g., fitting the doublet with a physically motivated line ratio or a density/temperature model) or explicitly present the identification as speculative and not evidence for a terminal SN.
  3. [Abstract; Sect. 6] The abstract states that [O I] is 'detected particularly clearly' and the conclusions use it as 'possible evidence of nucleosynthesised material generated in a SN explosion.' Given the unresolved fit and anomalous line ratio, this is an overstatement relative to the evidence. The text should be aligned with the result of the requested tests; if the identification remains ambiguous, the terminal-explosion statement should be removed or clearly qualified as one of several possible interpretations.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title; throughout] The transient is written as 'SN 2016cvk' in the text but 'SN 2016 cvk' in the title; please standardize.
  2. [Table 1 vs Sect. 3.1.2] The r-band peak magnitude for SN 2016cvk is -18.4 in Table 1 but -18.3 ± 0.1 in the text; reconcile.
  3. [Sect. 4.6 vs Sect. 6] The [O I] doublet ratio is given as 1.2 in Sect. 4.6 but described as 'close to unity' in the Conclusions; use one value.
  4. [Fig. 14] The figure caption lists only [O I] and [Ca ii] fits, while the spectrum labels [Ni II]? and [Fe II]; add the fitted/annotated species to the caption or legend.
  5. [Sect. 5] The edge-on disc-like CSM interpretation is speculative; it is presented with appropriate hedging, but it would help to mark it explicitly as a geometric conjecture in the conclusions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the analysis is observational, fits are descriptive, and the central [O I] claim is presented with explicit caveats rather than derived from its own input.

full rationale

The paper's inference chain is self-contained and data-driven. Light-curve phase parameters (Sect. 3.1) are descriptive fits to photometry; blackbody temperatures and radii (Sect. 3.2) are standard SED fits; Balmer-line component fits (Sect. 4.1) characterize observed profiles. The central claim—possible [O I] at +405 d (Sect. 4.6, Fig. 14, Conclusions)—is a spectral identification anchored to rest wavelengths, not an input relabeled as a prediction. The paper explicitly reports the non-canonical I(6300)/I(6364)=1.2 ratio, attributes it to collisional suppression, and phrases the nucleosynthesis interpretation as 'likely' and 'possible evidence', so the feature is not being used to assert the terminal-explosion conclusion by construction. Comparisons to external models (Boian & Groh 2019) and to other transients (SN 2010jl, SN 2009ip) provide independent points of reference. The few self-citations (e.g., Brennan et al. 2022b,c for fitting methodology and a geometric CSM model) are not load-bearing for the [O I] detection or the physical nature conclusion. No equation is shown to reduce to its own inputs, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The low S/N and possible blending of the +405 d [O I] feature are legitimate robustness concerns, but they are acknowledged in the paper and do not constitute circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central result rests on standard observational corrections (distance, extinction), assumed emission mechanisms (blackbody, recombination), and external model libraries. The only genuinely new postulate is the edge-on disc geometry, which has no independent evidence.

free parameters (4)
  • Plateau and tail Fermi-Dirac fit parameters (M0, p1, tPT, a0, omega0) = Not listed globally; fit per object and epoch
    Used to define plateau start and end, and to claim SN 2016cvk has the longest and most luminous plateau.
  • Event B onset time texp from exponential rise fit = -11 d for SN 2016cvk; -19 d for SN 2016jbu; -13.7 d for SN 2015bh
    Exponential rise fit f(t) = a(t - texp)^n is used to estimate the 16 +- 5 d flash-feature duration.
  • Blackbody temperature and radius per epoch = T from 5100 to 13800 K; R from 7.4e14 to 1.6e15 cm (Table A.6)
    SuperBol blackbody fits to multiband photometry characterize the temperature and radius evolution and the precursor outburst.
  • Balmer line component widths and centers (L1, G1, G2, G3) = Tables A.7 and A.8
    Multi-component Gaussian and Lorentzian fits describe line-profile evolution; the number of components was chosen manually per epoch.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Cosmology: H0 = 73 km/s/Mpc, OmegaM = 0.27, OmegaLambda = 0.73 for luminosity distances.
    Adopted in Sect. 2.1 to homogenize distances; affects all absolute magnitudes and luminosities.
  • domain assumption Galactic extinction from Schlafly and Finkbeiner (2011) with the Cardelli et al. (1989) law, RV = 3.1, and negligible host extinction.
    Sect. 2.1; absolute magnitudes and line ratios depend on extinction corrections.
  • domain assumption Blackbody emission approximation for the CSM photosphere.
    Sect. 3.2 and Table A.6; used to infer temperatures and radii.
  • domain assumption Boian and Groh (2019) flash-feature models approximate the early spectra sufficiently for abundance comparison.
    Sect. 4.3 and Fig. 11; the progenitor inference is only as good as these models, and the authors note the match is rough and temperatures are not fit.
  • domain assumption Hamuy (2003) 56Ni mass relation applies to the tail luminosity, modified as an upper limit because CSM interaction is ongoing.
    Sect. 3.1.3; the authors explicitly state this is an upper limit.
  • domain assumption The 6300 and 6364 Å features in the +405 d spectrum are the [O I] doublet.
    Sect. 4.6 and Fig. 14; the terminal-explosion claim rests on this identification, which the authors flag as uncertain because the flux ratio is not the canonical 3:1.
invented entities (1)
  • Edge-on disc-like CSM around SN 2016cvk
    purpose: Explains the absence of double-peaked Balmer lines while retaining the dense, disc-like CSM inferred from the low Balmer decrement.
    Introduced in Sects. 5 and 6 by analogy to SN 2016jbu and SN 2009ip models; no direct geometric measurement for SN 2016cvk. The paper itself calls it possible.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Long-term evolution of the SN 2009ip-like transient SN 2016cvk." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GMHDASPA

@misc{pith2026250902125,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Long-term evolution of the SN 2009ip-like transient SN 2016cvk},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GMHDASPA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.02125}
}
read the original abstract

The interacting transient SN 2016cvk (ASASSN-16jt) is a member of the peculiar SN 2009ip-like events. We present our follow-up data and aim to draw conclusions about the physical nature of the progenitor system. Our spectrophotometric data set of SN 2016cvk covers the ultraviolet, optical, and near-infrared wavelength region extending to +1681 d from the light curve peak; the data is analysed and compared to other SN 2009ip-like transients. Archival data reveals pre-outbursts of the progenitor with the first detection at -1219 d. The light curve evolution of SN 2016cvk consists of two consecutive luminous events A and B with peak magnitudes of M_V < -15.6 and M_r = -18.3 mag, respectively. The spectra are dominated by Balmer emission lines that have a complex, multi-component evolution similar to other SN 2009ip-like targets. SN 2016cvk is among the first detected SN 2009ip-like events that show early `flash ionisation' features of C III, N III, and He II, lasting for 16 +/- 5 d. Our late-time +405 d spectrum shows forbidden [Ca II], [Fe II], and [O I] features with the latter detected particularly clearly for a SN 2009ip-like event. The evolution of SN 2016cvk is similar to other SN 2009ip-like transients, with some uncommon traits. The lack of a double-peaked structure in the Balmer lines is likely caused by differences in the circumstellar medium structure or viewing angle. The flash features in the early spectra propose abundances consistent with a red, yellow, or blue supergiant progenitor rather than for example a luminous blue variable. The detection of [O I] in the +405 d spectrum suggests possible evidence of nucleosynthesised material generated in a SN explosion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.02125 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Image of the field of SN 2016cvk and its host galaxy ESO 344 - G 021 in r-band observed with a Las Cumbres Observatory 1m#5 tele￾scope in CTIO, Chile, on 2016 September 10. Location of the transient (α = 22h19m49s .39 and δ = −40◦40′03′′ .2) is marked in the subpanel im￾age with a red crosshair. The field stars used to calibrate the photometry are circled in the image. 2016 September 6.0 UT (JD = 2460924.5). Radio n… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Extinction-corrected absolute u, g,r, i,z, Y (AB magnitudes) and UVW2, UV M2, UVW1, U, B,V, J, H, K (Vega magnitudes) light curves for SN 2016cvk, shifted for clarity as indicated in the figure legend. The dashed vertical line at t = 0 signifies the event B peak. Downward-pointing triangles indicate upper limits. −−−−−−−− −   (#" "  ' % − − [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Extinction-corrected absolute r (or RAB) band light curves for a selection of SN 2009ip-like transients. Early V-band data is also included for SN 2016cvk. In the right figure the fits for the plateau and the tail phases are shown with solid curves. The dashed vertical line at t = 0 signifies the event B peak. previous studies of the comparison sample events. For targets with redshifts based observations of the tran… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Light curve phases of SN 2016cvk. Fits for the event B rise phase (black dashed curve) and the plateau phase (black solid curve) of the transient are included. 3.1. Light curve phases To define the phases of SN 2016cvk and to carry out compar￾isons between SN 2009ip-li…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Evolution of the blackbody temperature TBB (red circles) and radius RBB (blue triangles) of SN 2016cvk. Values reported for SN 2016jbu (Brennan et al. 2022c) are shown for comparison with dashed curves. objects at the beginning of the tail phase, and exhibits a slow de…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Spectral time series of SN 2016cvk with the epochs relative to the r-band maximum. The spectra have been dereddened and corrected to the rest frame wavelengths. The wavelengths of the most prominent spectral lines are indicated with vertical dashed lines and the tellur…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Evolution of the continuum-subtracted and peak-normalised Hα (left) and Hβ (right) lines of SN 2016cvk. component of the Hβ line at −86 d. The G3 component of Hα has a slightly lower maximum velocity of −10000 km s−1 . 4.1.2. Event B rise and peak During the event B ri…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Time evolution of FWHM (top) and centre (middle) of Gaussian and Lorentzian components yielded by the fit to the Hα and Hβ lines, along with the evolution of the I(Hα)/I(Hβ) Balmer decrement (bottom) for SN 2016cvk. tively). From the blue edge of the G3 component of Hα…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Partial spectra of SN 2016cvk in four earliest B phase epochs. The blended ‘flash ionisation’ feature is shown at ∼4700 Å. The loca￾tions of the N iii line at 4641 Å, C iii at 4650 Å, and He ii at 4686 Å are marked with red dashed lines. electron density, and varied wi…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Partial spectra of SN 2016jbu (Brennan et al. 2022b), SN 2015bh (Thöne et al. 2017), and SN 2010mc (Ofek et al. 2013a) dur￾ing event B rise phase. A flash ionisation feature is seen around 4700 Å in the −14, −13, and −11 d spectra of SN 2016jbu, in the −9, −6, −5, −3,…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The continuum-subtracted and Hβ-normalised −11 d spectrum of SN 2016cvk (black) compared to the early SN models by Boian & Groh (2019) of lower-mass RSG with solar abundance (orange), LBV star (light gray) and a CNO-processed high-mass RSG, YSG, or BSG star (light blu…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Near-infrared spectra of SN 2016cvk (black) compared to SN 2009ip (blue). The wavelengths of the most prominent telluric regions (13200−14100 Å and 18100−18600 Å) are covered with gray bands and indicated with the ⊕ symbol. The spectra have been vertically shifted for…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Late-time spectra of SN 2016cvk, SN 2009ip (Fraser et al. 2015) and SN 2010jl (Jencson et al. 2016). Flux presented in logarith￾mic scale. 4.6. Late-time spectroscopy The feature associated with the Ca ii NIR triplet has evolved to be increasingly asymmetric at the +2…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Abbott , T. M. C., Adam \'o w , M., Aguena , M., et al. 2021, , 255, 20

    2021

  2. [2]

    P., Gonz \'a lez-Gait \'a n , S., Hamuy , M., et al

    Anderson , J. P., Gonz \'a lez-Gait \'a n , S., Hamuy , M., et al. 2014, , 786, 67

    2014

  3. [3]

    2016, Transient Name Server Classification Report, 2016-650, 1

    Bersier , D., Smartt , S., & Yaron , O. 2016, Transient Name Server Classification Report, 2016-650, 1

    2016

  4. [4]

    & Groh , J

    Boian , I. & Groh , J. H. 2018, , 617, A115

    2018

  5. [5]

    & Groh , J

    Boian , I. & Groh , J. H. 2019, , 621, A109

    2019

  6. [6]

    A., Pearson, J., Shrestha, M., et al

    Bostroem, K. A., Pearson, J., Shrestha, M., et al. 2023, , 956, L5

    2023

  7. [7]

    J., Barmentloo , S., Schulze , S., et al

    Brennan , S. J., Barmentloo , S., Schulze , S., et al. 2025, , submitted

    2025

  8. [8]

    J., Elias-Rosa , N., Fraser , M., Van Dyk , S

    Brennan , S. J., Elias-Rosa , N., Fraser , M., Van Dyk , S. D., & Lyman , J. D. 2022 a , , 664, L18

    2022

Show all 90 references
  1. [9]

    J., Fraser , M., Johansson , J., et al

    Brennan , S. J., Fraser , M., Johansson , J., et al. 2022 b , , 513, 5642

    2022

  2. [10]

    J., Fraser , M., Johansson , J., et al

    Brennan , S. J., Fraser , M., Johansson , J., et al. 2022 c , , 513, 5666

    2022

  3. [11]

    S., Stanek , K

    Brimacombe , J., Brown , J. S., Stanek , K. Z., et al. 2016, The Astronomer's Telegram, 9439, 1

    2016

  4. [12]

    S., Prieto , J

    Brown , J. S., Prieto , J. L., Shappee , B. J., et al. 2016, The Astronomer's Telegram, 9445, 1

    2016

  5. [13]

    M., Baliber , N., Bianco , F

    Brown , T. M., Baliber , N., Bianco , F. B., et al. 2013, , 125, 1031

    2013

  6. [14]

    J., Gal-Yam , A., Yaron , O., et al

    Bruch , R. J., Gal-Yam , A., Yaron , O., et al. 2023, , 952, 119

    2023

  7. [15]

    N., Hill , J

    Burrows , D. N., Hill , J. E., Nousek , J. A., et al. 2005, , 120, 165

    2005

  8. [16]

    A., Clayton , G

    Cardelli , J. A., Clayton , G. C., & Mathis , J. S. 1989, , 345, 245

    1989

  9. [17]

    & Jacobson-Gal \'a n , W

    Dessart , L. & Jacobson-Gal \'a n , W. V. 2023, , 677, A105

    2023

  10. [18]

    Drake , S. A. & Ulrich , R. K. 1980, , 42, 351

    1980

  11. [19]

    Dwarkadas , V. V. 2011, , 412, 1639

    2011

  12. [20]

    2016, , 463, 3894

    Elias-Rosa , N., Pastorello , A., Benetti , S., et al. 2016, , 463, 3894

    2016

  13. [21]

    Fassia , A., Meikle , W. P. S., Chugai , N., et al. 2001, , 325, 907

    2001

  14. [22]

    A., Filippenko , A

    Fransson , C., Chevalier , R. A., Filippenko , A. V., et al. 2002, , 572, 350

    2002

  15. [23]

    J., et al

    Fransson , C., Ergon , M., Challis , P. J., et al. 2014, , 797, 118

    2014

  16. [24]

    2013, , 433, 1312

    Fraser , M., Inserra , C., Jerkstrand , A., et al. 2013, , 433, 1312

    2013

  17. [25]

    2015, , 453, 3886

    Fraser , M., Kotak , R., Pastorello , A., et al. 2015, , 453, 3886

    2015

  18. [26]

    O., et al

    Gal-Yam , A., Arcavi , I., Ofek , E. O., et al. 2014, , 509, 471

    2014

  19. [27]

    & Leonard , D

    Gal-Yam , A. & Leonard , D. C. 2009, , 458, 865

    2009

  20. [28]

    2004, , 611, 1005

    Gehrels , N., Chincarini , G., Giommi , P., et al. 2004, , 611, 1005

    2004

  21. [29]

    2025, , accepted for publication

    Goto , S., Yamanaka , M., Nagayama , T., et al. 2025, , accepted for publication

    2025

  22. [30]

    L., Bigley , A., Mauerhan , J

    Graham , M. L., Bigley , A., Mauerhan , J. C., et al. 2017, , 469, 1559

    2017

  23. [31]

    L., Sand , D

    Graham , M. L., Sand , D. J., Valenti , S., et al. 2014, , 787, 163

    2014

  24. [32]

    H., Georgy , C., & Ekstr \"o m , S

    Groh , J. H., Georgy , C., & Ekstr \"o m , S. 2013, , 558, L1

    2013

  25. [33]

    2003, , 582, 905

    Hamuy , M. 2003, , 582, 905

    2003

  26. [34]

    P., Giovanelli , R., Herter , T., et al

    Haynes , M. P., Giovanelli , R., Herter , T., et al. 1997, , 113, 1197

    1997

  27. [35]

    B., Wiersema , K., Covino , S., et al

    Higgins , A. B., Wiersema , K., Covino , S., et al. 2019, , 482, 5023

    2019

  28. [36]

    2023, , 955, L8

    Hiramatsu , D., Tsuna , D., Berger , E., et al. 2023, , 955, L8

    2023

  29. [37]

    V., Davis , K

    Jacobson-Gal \'a n , W. V., Davis , K. W., Kilpatrick , C. D., et al. 2024, , 972, 177

    2024

  30. [38]

    V., Dessart , L., Jones , D

    Jacobson-Gal \'a n , W. V., Dessart , L., Jones , D. O., et al. 2022, , 924, 15

    2022

  31. [39]

    V., Dessart , L., Margutti , R., et al

    Jacobson-Gal \'a n , W. V., Dessart , L., Margutti , R., et al. 2023, , 954, L42

    2023

  32. [40]

    Z., Kochanek , C

    Jayasinghe , T., Stanek , K. Z., Kochanek , C. S., et al. 2019, , 485, 961

    2019

  33. [41]

    E., Prieto , J

    Jencson , J. E., Prieto , J. L., Kochanek , C. S., et al. 2016, , 456, 2622

    2016

  34. [42]

    E., Sand , D

    Jencson , J. E., Sand , D. J., Andrews , J. E., et al. 2022, , 935, L33

    2022

  35. [43]

    P., Richards , G

    Jester , S., Schneider , D. P., Richards , G. T., et al. 2005, , 130, 873

    2005

  36. [44]

    2016, , 818, 3

    Khazov , D., Yaron , O., Gal-Yam , A., et al. 2016, , 818, 3

    2016

  37. [45]

    D., Foley , R

    Kilpatrick , C. D., Foley , R. J., Drout , M. R., et al. 2018, , 473, 4805

    2018

  38. [46]

    2020, , 642, A214

    Kurf \"u rst , P., Pejcha , O., & Krti c ka , J. 2020, , 642, A214

    2020

  39. [47]

    M., Stringfellow , G

    Levesque , E. M., Stringfellow , G. S., Ginsburg , A. G., Bally , J., & Keeney , B. A. 2014, , 147, 23

    2014

  40. [48]

    M., et al

    Margutti , R., Milisavljevic , D., Soderberg , A. M., et al. 2014, , 780, 21

    2014

  41. [49]

    G., Smith , N., et al

    Mauerhan , J., Williams , G. G., Smith , N., et al. 2014, , 442, 1166

    2014

  42. [50]

    C., Smith , N., Filippenko , A

    Mauerhan , J. C., Smith , N., Filippenko , A. V., et al. 2013, , 430, 1801

    2013

  43. [51]

    2009, Central Bureau Electronic Telegrams, 1928, 1

    Maza , J., Hamuy , M., Antezana , R., et al. 2009, Central Bureau Electronic Telegrams, 1928, 1

    2009

  44. [52]

    Moore , C. E. 1945, Contributions from the Princeton University Observatory, 20, 1

    1945

  45. [53]

    A., Menanteau , F., et al

    Morganson , E., Gruendl , R. A., Menanteau , F., et al. 2018, , 130, 074501

    2018

  46. [54]

    J., Galbany , L., Jim \'e nez-Palau , C., et al

    Moriya , T. J., Galbany , L., Jim \'e nez-Palau , C., et al. 2023, , 677, A20

    2023

  47. [55]

    B., & Ingargiola, A

    Newville, M., Stensitzki, T., Allen, D. B., & Ingargiola, A. 2014, Zenodo

    2014

  48. [56]

    2018, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 2, 230

    Nicholl , M. 2018, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 2, 230

    2018

  49. [57]

    O., Lin , L., Kouveliotou , C., et al

    Ofek , E. O., Lin , L., Kouveliotou , C., et al. 2013 a , , 768, 47

    2013

  50. [58]

    O., Sullivan , M., Cenko , S

    Ofek , E. O., Sullivan , M., Cenko , S. B., et al. 2013 b , , 494, 65

    2013

  51. [59]

    2010, , 715, 833

    Olivares, F., Hamuy, M., Pignata, G., et al. 2010, , 715, 833

    2010

  52. [60]

    Osterbrock , D. E. & Ferland , G. J. 2006, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei (University Science Books)

    2006

  53. [61]

    2016, Transient Name Server Discovery Report, 2016-422, 1

    Parker , S. 2016, Transient Name Server Discovery Report, 2016-422, 1

    2016

  54. [62]

    2013, , 767, 1

    Pastorello , A., Cappellaro , E., Inserra , C., et al. 2013, , 767, 1

    2013

  55. [63]

    S., Fraser , M., et al

    Pastorello , A., Kochanek , C. S., Fraser , M., et al. 2018, , 474, 197

    2018

  56. [64]

    2025, , accepted for publication

    Pastorello , A., Reguitti , A., Tartaglia , L., et al. 2025, , accepted for publication

    2025

  57. [65]

    2024, , 688, L28

    Pessi , T., Cartier , R., Hueichapan , E., et al. 2024, , 688, L28

    2024

  58. [66]

    L., & Dessart , L

    Pessi , T., Prieto , J. L., & Dessart , L. 2023, , 677, L1

    2023

  59. [67]

    L., Monard , B., et al

    Pessi , T., Prieto , J. L., Monard , B., et al. 2022, , 928, 138

    2022

  60. [68]

    L., Brimacombe , J., Drake , A

    Prieto , J. L., Brimacombe , J., Drake , A. J., & Howerton , S. 2013, , 763, L27

    2013

  61. [69]

    2024, , 686, A231

    Reguitti , A., Pignata , G., Pastorello , A., et al. 2024, , 686, A231

    2024

  62. [70]

    R., Baade , D., et al

    Reilly , E., Maund , J. R., Baade , D., et al. 2017, , 470, 1491

    2017

  63. [71]

    Roming , P. W. A., Kennedy , T. E., Mason , K. O., et al. 2005, , 120, 95

    2005

  64. [72]

    D., Kool , E

    Ryder , S. D., Kool , E. C., Stockdale , C. J., et al. 2016, The Astronomer's Telegram, 9475, 1

    2016

  65. [73]

    Schlafly , E. F. & Finkbeiner , D. P. 2011, , 737, 103

    2011

  66. [74]

    Z., et al

    Shappee , B., Prieto , J., Stanek , K. Z., et al. 2014, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 223, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts \#223, 236.03

    2014

  67. [75]

    A., Sand , D

    Shrestha , M., Bostroem , K. A., Sand , D. J., et al. 2024, , 972, L15

    2024

  68. [76]

    F., Cutri , R

    Skrutskie , M. F., Cutri , R. M., Stiening , R., et al. 2006, , 131, 1163

    2006

  69. [77]

    Smartt , S. J. 2009, , 47, 63

    2009

  70. [78]

    J., Valenti , S., Fraser , M., et al

    Smartt , S. J., Valenti , S., Fraser , M., et al. 2015, , 579, A40

    2015

  71. [79]

    E., Filippenko, A

    Smith, N., Andrews, J. E., Filippenko, A. V., et al. 2022, , 515, 71

    2022

  72. [80]

    C., Kasliwal , M

    Smith , N., Mauerhan , J. C., Kasliwal , M. M., & Burgasser , A. J. 2013, , 434, 2721

    2013

  73. [81]

    C., & Prieto , J

    Smith , N., Mauerhan , J. C., & Prieto , J. L. 2014, , 438, 1191

    2014

  74. [82]

    J., et al

    Smith , N., Pearson , J., Sand , D. J., et al. 2023, , 956, 46

    2023

  75. [83]

    2016, , 459, 1039

    Tartaglia , L., Pastorello , A., Sullivan , M., et al. 2016, , 459, 1039

    2016

  76. [84]

    The Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille, T. P. , Tollerud, E. J. , et al. 2013, , 558, A33

    2013

  77. [85]

    C., de Ugarte Postigo , A., Leloudas , G., et al

    Th \"o ne , C. C., de Ugarte Postigo , A., Leloudas , G., et al. 2017, , 599, A129

    2017

  78. [86]

    2011, , 416, 3138

    Valenti , S., Fraser , M., Benetti , S., et al. 2011, , 416, 3138

    2011

  79. [87]

    I., Ryan-Weber , E

    Wong , O. I., Ryan-Weber , E. V., Garcia-Appadoo , D. A., et al. 2006, , 371, 1855

    2006

  80. [88]

    Wright , E. L. 2006, , 118, 1711

    2006

  81. [89]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sent...

  82. [90]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.