Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 146 references

Factorization of periods, construction of automorphic motives and Deligne's conjecture over CM-fields

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proves the Tate relation between automorphic and motivic periods, and hence Deligne's conjecture, for a class of CM automorphic motives.

desk verdict Serious and genuinely conditional: the new factorization of periods over general CM fields is real, but the main theorem currently rests on an unproved archimedean rationality conjecture, an unpublished companion paper, and a motive constructed without infinite Frobenius, so the advertised Deligne period on the right-hand side is not yet well-defined. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.02303 v1 pith:ONNAUOYL submitted 2025-09-02 math.NT math.RT

Harald Grobner , Michael Harris , Jie Lin This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.NTmath.RT MSC 11F6711F7011G1811R3922E55
keywords Deligne'sconjectureautomorphicperiodsRankin–SelbergL-functionsunitarygroupsCMfieldsmotivesShimuravarietiesIchino–Ikeda–Neal-Harrisformula
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to prove Deligne's conjecture on critical values of motivic L-functions for a class of automorphic motives attached to unitary groups over CM fields. Its central claim is a factorization: the arithmetic automorphic periods attached to a cohomological cuspidal representation Π break into products P_0,...,P_n, and each factor agrees, up to a number-field scalar, with the corresponding motivic period of the motive constructed from Π. Once this 'Tate relation' holds, critical values of Rankin–Selberg L-functions L(s, Π×Π1) are identified with Deligne's periods of the tensor-product motive up to an archimedean constant. Under a stated conjecture on the rationality of archimedean local integrals, that constant is rational, and Deligne's conjecture follows for these motives. The result matters because it converts a conjectural period-theoretic relation into a theorem for a large class of representations, conditional on one concrete computational hypothesis.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing identity is the factorization P^(i)(Π,ı) ≍ P_0(Π,ı)···P_i(Π,ı), mirroring the motivic factorization Q^(i)=Q_0···Q_i of Deligne's periods. It is proved by induction on n using the Ichino–Ikeda–Neal-Harris (IINH) formula, now a theorem, which expresses global Gan–Gross–Prasad periods as ratios of critical Rankin–Selberg and Asai L-values. A nonvanishing cup-product result in coherent cohomology lets the test vectors f,f' be chosen de Rham-rational with algebraic pairing, so the numerator of the IINH identity is 1 up to a scalar; the denominator is then resolved by the Asai L-value theorem and the factorization of arithmetic periods. Each induction step descends to a unitary gr

What would settle it

Compute the archimedean local integral I*_v(f_v,f'_v) of Conjecture 4.16 for a new pair of discrete series representations (for instance n=3 or n=4 with minimal K-types) and show it lies outside the compositum Epπ(q))Epπ'(q)); that would disprove the rationality hypothesis and leave the factorization true only up to a transcendental archimedean constant.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The main theorem (Theorem 5.8) states: for a cohomological, conjugate self-dual, cuspidal automorphic representation Π of GL_n over a CM field F satisfying Hypothesis 2.3 and the relevant regularity conditions, and assuming Conjecture 4.16, the local arithmetic automorphic periods satisfy the Tate relation P^(i)(Π,ı) ~ P_0(Π,ı)···P_i(Π,ı), with P_i(Π,ı) ~ Q_i(M(Π),ı), where M(Π) is the regular pure motive constructed in Theorem 3.16 from the cohomology of Shimura varieties. Combined with the Rankin–Selberg formula from the companion paper [GHLR] and the motivic split-index formula of [Har-Lin17], this gives (5.26): the critical value L^S(s0, Π⊗Π1) is proportional to Deligne's period c^+(s0,R

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the archimedean local integrals that determine the final constant take values in the expected number field—Conjecture 4.16, checked only in a few cases—while the Rankin–Selberg formula the proof starts from is supplied by an unpublished companion paper.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every pair Π,Π1 satisfying the regularity, local, and Conjecture 4.16 hypotheses, the critical value L^S(s0, Π⊗Π1) is identified with Deligne's period c^+(s0, R_{F/Q}(M(Π)⊗M(Π1))) up to a rational factor; Deligne's conjecture holds for these tensor-product motives.
  • The arithmetic automorphic periods P^(i)(Π,ı) are no longer just abstract invariants: each decomposes as a product of Petersson norms of coherent-cohomology classes, and each factor is individually motivic (P_i ~ Q_i).
  • The factorization is compatible with the Tate conjecture: the automorphic factorization mirrors the motivic factorization of Deligne periods obtained from split indices, so the period relations predicted by Tate hold in these cases.
  • The archimedean obstruction is isolated: without Conjecture 4.16 the theorem still gives a weaker form (5.11) in which all identities hold up to a single archimedean constant depending only on the infinity types, so the remaining problem is exactly the rationality of that constant.
  • This extends the earlier imaginary-quadratic-field case to general CM fields F, with the role of the theta correspondence replaced by the IINH formula and coherent-cohomology nonvanishing.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct computation verifying Conjecture 4.16 for any new archimedean pair would immediately make the main theorem unconditional for that pair; the authors note methods are known but hard, so this is a concrete next test.
  • The same 'solve for the unknown unknowns' strategy—using an IINH-type identity with algebraic cup-product numerators—is likely to transfer to other classical groups where local Gan–Gross–Prasad formulas are proven, though the regularity hypotheses will need reworking.
  • Since the paper works with partial L-functions and remarks that ramified factors can be removed without changing rationality, the same Deligne-conjecture statement should hold for complete L-functions once local factors at ramified places are incorporated.
  • The factorization suggests a stronger, testable phenomenon: every automorphic period of coherent-cohomology type on these unitary groups should be expressible as a product of the basic periods P_i(Π,ı), and this product structure should agree with a motivic factorization under the Tate conjecture—beyond the tensor-product cases proved here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a factorization of arithmetic automorphic periods P^(i)(Π,ı) attached to conjugate self-dual cuspidal automorphic representations of GL(n) over a CM field F into products P_0(Π,ı)...P_i(Π,ı), and identifies each factor P_i(Π,ı) with the motivic period Q_i(M(Π),ı) of a CM-automorphic motive M(Π) constructed in the coherent cohomology of unitary Shimura varieties. This is then combined with a Rankin–Selberg period formula quoted from the companion paper [GHLR] and with the now-theorem Ichino–Ikeda–Neal-Harris formula to conclude Deligne’s conjecture for the critical values of Rankin–Selberg L-functions L(s,Π⊗Π′) over CM fields, up to an archimedean factor that is rational under Conjecture 4.16. The main results are Theorems 5.6, 5.8 and 5.25; they are conditional on Conjecture 4.16, on Theorem 1 of the unpublished companion paper [GHLR], and, as I detail below, on a construction of M(Π) that currently omits a crucial datum, the infinite Frobenius F_{B,ı}.

Significance. If all the ingredients were available, this would be a substantial advance: a period factorization on unitary groups matching the motivic factorization predicted by Tate’s conjecture, and a proof of Deligne’s conjecture for a broad class of Rankin–Selberg motives over CM fields. The paper also has genuine strengths: it uses the Ichino–Ikeda–Neal-Harris formula in its now-proved form, it invokes multiplicity-one and rationality results that are already in the literature, and it is unusually explicit about the hypotheses it needs. However, as it stands the central identification is not a fully defined theorem: the motive M(Π) is not shown to satisfy Definition 1.7 because the infinite Frobenius is missing, and the main theorem relies on an unpublished companion paper. These are not merely cosmetic gaps, so the present version cannot be accepted as a proof of the advertised result.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.3, Theorem 3.16; §3.3.1; Remark 3.17(3); Theorem 5.8; §5.4 (5.26)] Theorem 3.16 states that the constructed data satisfy Definition 1.7 "with the exception of (i) (the infinite Frobenius); see 3.3.1". Section 3.3.1 then says that using complex conjugation of differential forms as a surrogate for F_{B,ı} "is not quite right", and Remark 3.17(3) says the statements of §3.3 may be regarded as special cases of a Langlands conjecture "promised for a sequel to [KSZ21]" and "will not be used elsewhere, except heuristically in the statement of Theorem 5.8". But Theorem 5.8 is the main theorem, and Theorem 5.25(5.26) invokes Deligne’s period c^+(s0, R_{F/Q}(M(Π)⊗M(Π′))) from §1.5.2. The spaces M^±_{B,ı} and the periods c± are defined only after choosing F_{B,ı}. Without F_{B,ı}, the right-hand side of (5.26) is not a well-defined Deligne period. Thus even granting [GHLR] and Conjecture 4.16, the advertised motivic identification is not currently a fully defined
  2. [§2.5, §5.3, References [GHLR]] The whole proof starts from Theorem 1, quoted from [GHLR], which is listed in the references as "in preparation (2025)", and from [Lin15b], an unpublished doctoral thesis. In particular, formula (5.14), the central Rankin–Selberg identity used in Step 1 of the proof of Theorem 5.6, is imported from that companion paper. A referee cannot verify the main theorem without access to [GHLR]. At minimum, [GHLR] must be posted on arXiv or otherwise made publicly available, and its Theorem 1 must be stated in the present paper as an explicit hypothesis rather than as an established result.
  3. [Conjecture 4.16; Theorems 5.6, 5.8 and 5.25] Conjecture 4.16, the rationality of the archimedean local integrals I^*_v(f_v,f_v′), is explicitly unproved and is checked only in a few cases; the text says it "can only be settled by a computation". It is assumed in Theorems 5.6 and 5.8. This is a legitimate conditional framework, but the final statement, Theorem 5.25, does not list Conjecture 4.16 as a hypothesis and appears to assert the conclusion unconditionally (apart from the usual hypotheses of Theorem 1). The exact logical status of the final theorem must be clarified: if the main result is conditional on Conjecture 4.16, that assumption must appear in every statement of the main theorem.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.2.1, §5.4] The word "Hypotheis" appears twice (Hypothesis 2.3 and Theorem 5.25).
  2. [§1.5.1] There is a typo: "Delgine" should be "Deligne".
  3. [Definition 5.7] The definition of P_n(Π,ı) as P^(n)(Π,ı)/∏_{i=0}^{n-1}P_i(Π,ı) makes the asserted factorization (5.9) for i=n definitionally true. The mathematical content of Theorem 5.8 is entirely in the cases 0≤i≤n−1; this should be stated explicitly to avoid the appearance of a tautology.
  4. [References] Several references are to unpublished or in-preparation works: [GHLR], [Lin15b], [Lin17b], [KSZ21]. The authors should update these when available, and in the meantime the dependence on them should be clearly flagged in the introduction and in each theorem that uses them.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

Central factorization is partly built into the definitions and rests on unpublished same-author citations; the motive side is explicitly heuristic, so the paper's main claim is not fully well-defined.

  1. self citation load bearing [Introduction, Theorem 1 (p. 2); used in §5.3, Step 1, equation (5.14)]
    "Our first main ingredient to do so is our upcoming paper with Raghuram, in which we are going to prove the following statement: Theorem 1 ([GHLR, Lin15b])."

    The proof of the main factorization substitutes formula (2) of Theorem 1 into the Ichino–Ikeda–Neal-Harris identity and solves for the period ratios. [GHLR] is an unpublished companion paper by the same three authors plus Raghuram; it is not machine-checked and is not otherwise available as an independent external theorem. The paper's central derivation therefore starts from a load-bearing citation to the authors' own forthcoming work.

  2. self definitional [§5.2, Definition 5.7 and Theorem 5.8, equation (5.9)]
    "We define P_i(Π, ı) := P^(0)(Π, ı) if i = 0; Q(π^(i−1)) pp(qξΠ, Σ) if 1 ≤ i ≤ n−1; P^(n)(Π, ı) ∏_{i=0}^{n−1} P_i(Π, ı)^{-1} if i = n."

    For i = n, the claimed factorization (5.9), P^(n) ~ P_0 P_1 ... P_n, is an identity by the definition of P_n as the leftover quotient. For 1 ≤ i ≤ n−1, (5.9) is just the telescoping product of the ratio formulas in Theorem 5.6. Thus the 'Tate relation' factorization is partly a formal consequence of the way the factors are defined, not an independent predictive statement.

1 more flagged steps
  1. other [§3.3, Theorem 3.16; §3.3.1; Remark 3.17(3); used in Theorem 5.8 and (5.26)]
    "More precisely, the data satisfy the conditions of Definition 1.7, with the exception of (i) (the infinite Frobenius); see 3.3.1 below. ... It is most convenient to take complex conjugation of differential forms as a surrogate for the operator F_{B,ı} ... this is not quite right. ... Since the statements claimed here will not be used elsewhere, except heuristically in the statement of Theorem 5.8, this is harmless."

    Deligne's periods c^± and the motivic periods Q_i(M, ı) used in (5.10) and (5.26) are defined after choosing the infinite Frobenius F_{B,ı} (Section 1.5.2). Theorem 3.16 explicitly omits this datum, and §3.3.1 says the surrogate is 'not quite right'. Remark 3.17(3) then confines the construction to heuristic use in Theorem 5.8—which is exactly the theorem that asserts the Tate relation and feeds the Deligne-conjecture statement (5.26). The right-hand side of the main identification is therefore not an independently defined motive; it is a heuristic stand-in from the same cohomological construction, so the advertised motivic conclusion is not well-defined as stated.

full rationale

The paper contains genuine independent content: Theorem 5.6 compares the IINH formula (now proved by external authors) with the Rankin–Selberg period formula, giving nontrivial ratios of arithmetic automorphic periods. If one grants Theorem 1 from [GHLR] and Conjecture 4.16, the lower-index factorization has real substance. However, the paper's presentation as a proof of Deligne's conjecture is compromised. The top factor P_n is defined precisely to make the product formula (5.9) true, so part of the 'factorization' reduces to a definition. The starting formula itself comes from an unpublished same-author paper [GHLR] that is load-bearing. Most seriously, the motive M(Π) constructed in Theorem 3.16 lacks the infinite Frobenius, and the paper explicitly says the construction is used only 'heuristically in the statement of Theorem 5.8'; yet Theorem 5.8 and its consequence (5.26) rely on the motivic periods and Deligne's c^+ attached to that object. These are not mere stylistic issues: they mean the main theorem as stated is not fully well-defined and the motivic identification is partly heuristic. I therefore assign a score of 5 rather than 0–2, but not 8–10, because the automorphic period comparison itself is not merely a restatement of its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The ledger contains no fitted numerical constants; the regularity thresholds (n+4, n+3) are qualitative hypotheses, not fitted values. The main debt is logical rather than numerical: two unproved assumptions (Conjecture 4.16 and Theorem 1 of [GHLR]) and a heuristic motive construction carry the central claim, while the genuinely external input is the IINH formula.

assumptions (6)
  • ad hoc to paper Theorem 1 from [GHLR]: automorphic Deligne conjecture for Rankin-Selberg L-functions over CM fields, proving equation (2).
    Quoted as a theorem from an unpublished 'in preparation' paper by Grobner, Harris, Lin and Raghuram; no proof or preprint is supplied. It is the starting point for translating critical values into automorphic periods.
  • ad hoc to paper Conjecture 4.16: archimedean local zeta integrals I*_v(f_v,f'_v) take values in E_p(π)E_p(π') for de Rham rational vectors in minimal K-types.
    Assumed in Theorems 5.6, 5.8 and 5.25. Without it the paper only has (5.11) with an unknown archimedean factor I8.
  • domain assumption Hypothesis 2.3: for every signature tuple I there is a unitary group H_I with nonempty global L-packet of the descent of Π.
    Imposed on all GL_n representations; needed to define arithmetic automorphic periods P^(I).
  • ad hoc to paper Langlands conjecture on Hasse-Weil zeta functions of Shimura varieties of abelian type, promised in a sequel to [KSZ21].
    Remark 3.17 says Theorem 3.16's L-function identification is otherwise heuristic; the statement is called harmless because it is only heuristic in Theorem 5.8, but Theorem 5.8 still invokes the motive M(Π).
  • standard math Ichino-Ikeda-Neal-Harris formula (Theorem 4.5), now a theorem via [Zha14, Xue17, Beu-Ple21, BLZZ21, BCZ22].
    External theorem used as the central tool linking GGP periods to critical L-values.
  • domain assumption Gan-Gross-Prasad local conjecture for unitary groups [Beu-Ple20], used to produce a nonvanishing Hom in the proof of Theorem 4.14.
    In the proof of Theorem 4.14, existence of a local representation τ with a nonzero Hom space relies on the GGP conjecture; the authors note this step explicitly.
invented entities (2)
  • CM-automorphic motive M(Π)
    purpose: To carry the Deligne period c± and make Theorem 5.25 a statement about Deligne's conjecture.
    Theorem 3.16 explicitly withholds condition (i) of Definition 1.7 (infinite Frobenius); the L-function identification is described in Remark 3.17 as conditional on a promised sequel to [KSZ21] and is only heuristic in Theorem 5.8.
  • Factorized period invariants P_i(Π,ı)
    purpose: Intermediate quantities in Definition 5.7 that make the claimed factorization (5.9) and the identification with motivic Q_i (5.10) hold.
    Defined directly from P^(i) and Q(π(i-1)) after Theorem 5.6; no independent falsifiable prediction is attached.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Factorization of periods, construction of automorphic motives and Deligne's conjecture over CM-fields." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ONNAUOYL

@misc{pith2026250902303,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Factorization of periods, construction of automorphic motives and Deligne's conjecture over CM-fields},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ONNAUOYL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.02303}
}
abstract

The present paper is devoted to the relations between Deligne's conjecture on critical values of motivic $L$-functions and the multiplicative relations between periods of arithmetically normalized automorphic forms on unitary groups. As an application of our main result, we establish Deligne's conjecture for a class of CM-automorphic motives, which we construct in this paper. Our proof uses the results of our recent joint work with Raghuram in combination with the Ichino--Ikeda--Neal-Harris (IINH) formula for unitary groups -- which is now a theorem -- and an analysis of cup products of coherent cohomological automorphic forms on Shimura varieties to establish relations between certain automorphic periods and critical values of Rankin-Selberg and Asai $L$-functions of $\GL(n)\times\GL(m)$ over CM fields. By reinterpreting these critical values in terms of automorphic periods of holomorphic automorphic forms on unitary groups, we show that the automorphic periods of holomorphic forms can be factored as products of coherent cohomological forms, compatibly with a motivic factorization predicted by the Tate conjecture. All of these results are stated under a certain regularity condition and an hypothesis of rationality on archimedean zeta-integrals.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

146 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Andr\'e, Une introduction aux motifs , Panoramas et Synth\`ethses 17 , Soc

    Y. Andr\'e, Une introduction aux motifs , Panoramas et Synth\`ethses 17 , Soc. Math. France (2004)

    2004

  2. [2]

    Arthur, The Endoscopic Classification of Representations - Orthogonal and Symplectic Groups , Colloquium Publications 61 (AMS, 2013)

    J. Arthur, The Endoscopic Classification of Representations - Orthogonal and Symplectic Groups , Colloquium Publications 61 (AMS, 2013)

    2013

  3. [3]

    A. Ash, D. Ginzburg, p -adic L -functions for GL (2n) , Invent. Math. 116 (1994) pp. 27--73

    1994

  4. [4]

    Atobe, W

    H. Atobe, W. T. Gan, A. Ichino, T. Kaletha, A. Minguez, S. W. Shin, Local Intertwining Relations and Co-tempered A -packets of Classical Groups , preprint (2025)

    2025

  5. [5]

    Balasubramanyam, A

    B. Balasubramanyam, A. Raghuram, Special values of adjoint L-functions and congruences for automorphic forms on (n) over a number field, preprint dated November, 1 (2014)

    2014

  6. [6]

    E. M. Baruch, A proof of Kirillov's conjecture, Ann. of Math. 158 (2003) 207--252

    2003

  7. [7]

    J. N. Bernstein, P-invariant distributions on GL (N) and the classification of unitary representations of GL (N) (non-Archimedean case) , in: Lie group representations, II , (College Park, Md., 1982/1983) Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1041 (1984) pp. 50--102

    1982

  8. [8]

    Blasius, Period relations and critical values of L -functions , in: Olga Taussky-Todd, in Memoriam , eds

    D. Blasius, Period relations and critical values of L -functions , in: Olga Taussky-Todd, in Memoriam , eds. M. Aschbacher, D. Blasius, and D. Ramakrishnan, Pacific J. Math., Special Issue, 183 , No. 3, (1997), pp. 53--83

    1997

Show all 146 references
  1. [9]

    Bella\"iche, G

    J. Bella\"iche, G. Chenevier, Families of Galois representations and Selmer groups, Ast\'erisque 324 (2009)

    2009

  2. [10]

    Beuzart-Plessis, Comparison of local spherical characters and the Ichino-Ikeda conjecture for unitary groups, J

    R. Beuzart-Plessis, Comparison of local spherical characters and the Ichino-Ikeda conjecture for unitary groups, J. de l'Institut de Math\'ematiques de Jussieu doi:10.1017/S1474748019000707 (2020) 1--52

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    Beuzart-Plessis, A local trace formula for the Gan-Gross-Prasad conjecture for unitary groups: the archimedean case , Ast\'erisque , 418 (2020)

    R. Beuzart-Plessis, A local trace formula for the Gan-Gross-Prasad conjecture for unitary groups: the archimedean case , Ast\'erisque , 418 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    Beuzart-Plessis, Endoscopie et conjecture locale raffin\'ee de Gan-Gross-Prasad pour les groupes unitaires, Compos

    R. Beuzart-Plessis, Endoscopie et conjecture locale raffin\'ee de Gan-Gross-Prasad pour les groupes unitaires, Compos. Math. 151 (2015) 1309--1371

    2015

  5. [13]

    Beuzart-Plessis, Plancherel formula for GL_n(F) GL_n(E) and applications to the Ichino-Ikeda and formal degree conjectures for unitary groups, Invent

    R. Beuzart-Plessis, Plancherel formula for GL_n(F) GL_n(E) and applications to the Ichino-Ikeda and formal degree conjectures for unitary groups, Invent. Math. , 225 (2021) 159--297

    2021

  6. [14]

    Beuzart-Plessis, P.-H

    R. Beuzart-Plessis, P.-H. Chaudouard, M. Zydor, The global Gan-Gross-Prasad conjecture for unitary groups: the endoscopic case, Publ. math IHES , 135 (2022) 183--336

    2022

  7. [15]

    Beuzart-Plessis, Y

    R. Beuzart-Plessis, Y. Liu, W. Zhang, X. Zhu, Isolation of cuspidal spectrum, with application to the Gan-Gross-Prasad conjecture, Ann. Math. 194 (2021) 519--584

    2021

  8. [16]

    Blasius, On the Critical Values of Hecke L -Series, Ann

    D. Blasius, On the Critical Values of Hecke L -Series, Ann. Math. 124 (1986) 23--63

    1986

  9. [17]

    Blasius, Period relations and critical values of L -functions , in: Olga Taussky-Todd, in Memoriam , eds

    D. Blasius, Period relations and critical values of L -functions , in: Olga Taussky-Todd, in Memoriam , eds. M. Aschbacher, D. Blasius and D. Ramakrishnan, Pacific J. Math., Special Issue, 183 , No. 3, (1997), pp. 53--83

    1997

  10. [18]

    Blasius, M

    D. Blasius, M. Harris, D. Ramakrishnan, Coherent cohomology, Limits of discrete series, and Galois conjugation, Duke Math. J. 73 (1994) 647 -- 685

    1994

  11. [19]

    Blomer, X

    V. Blomer, X. Li, S. D. Miller, A spectral reciprocity formula and non-vanishing for L -functions on GL(4) GL(2) , J. Number Theory 205 (2019) 1--43

    2019

  12. [20]

    Borel, Automorphic L-functions, in: Proc

    A. Borel, Automorphic L-functions, in: Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Vol. XXXIII, part II, AMS, Providence, R.I., (1979), pp. 27-61

    1979

  13. [21]

    Borel, Some finiteness properties of adele groups over number fields, Publ

    A. Borel, Some finiteness properties of adele groups over number fields, Publ. Math. IHES 16 (1963) pp. 5--30

    1963

  14. [22]

    Borel, Stable Real Cohomology of Arithmetic Groups II , in: Manifolds and Lie Groups, Papers in Honor of Yoz\^o Matsushima , eds

    A. Borel, Stable Real Cohomology of Arithmetic Groups II , in: Manifolds and Lie Groups, Papers in Honor of Yoz\^o Matsushima , eds. J. J. Hano, A. Morimoto, S. Murakami, K. Okamoto, H. Ozeki, Progress in Mathematics 14 (Boston, 1981), pp. 21--55

    1981

  15. [23]

    Borel, W

    A. Borel, W. Casselman, L^2 -Cohomology of locally symmetric manifolds of finite volume Duke Math. J. 50 (1983) pp. 625-647

    1983

  16. [24]

    Borel, H

    A. Borel, H. Jacquet, Automorphic forms and automorphic representations , in: Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Vol. XXXIII, part I, AMS, Providence, R.I., (1979), pp. 189-202

    1979

  17. [25]

    Borel, N

    A. Borel, N. Wallach, Continuous cohomology, discrete subgroups and representations of reductive groups , Ann. of Math. Studies 94 , (Princeton Univ. Press, New Jersey, 2000)

    2000

  18. [26]

    D. Bump, S. Friedberg, The Exterior Square Automorphic L-Functions on GL(n) , in: Festschrift in Honour of Prof. I.I. Piatetski-Shapiro , Israel Math. Conf. Proc. 3 (1990) pp. 47--65

    1990

  19. [27]

    Burger, P

    M. Burger, P. Sarnak, Ramanujan Duals II, Invent. Math. 106 (1991) 1--11

    1991

  20. [28]

    Caraiani, Local-global compatibility and the action of monodromy on nearby cycles, Duke Math

    A. Caraiani, Local-global compatibility and the action of monodromy on nearby cycles, Duke Math. J. 161 (2012) 2311--2413

    2012

  21. [29]

    Chen, Algebraicity of ratios of Rankin-Selberg L -functions and applications to Deligne's conjecture, https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.15382v3

    S.-Y. Chen, Algebraicity of ratios of Rankin-Selberg L -functions and applications to Deligne's conjecture, https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.15382v3

    arXiv

  22. [30]

    Clozel, Motifs et Formes Automorphes: Applications du Principe de Fonctorialit\'e , in: Automorphic forms, Shimura varieties, and L -functions , Vol

    L. Clozel, Motifs et Formes Automorphes: Applications du Principe de Fonctorialit\'e , in: Automorphic forms, Shimura varieties, and L -functions , Vol. I, Perspect. Math., vol. 10, eds. L. Clozel and J. S. Milne, (Ann Arbor, MI, 1988) Academic Press, Boston, MA, 1990, pp. 77--159

    1988

  23. [31]

    Clozel, On the cohomology of Kottwitz's arithmetic varieties, Duke Math

    L. Clozel, On the cohomology of Kottwitz's arithmetic varieties, Duke Math. J. 72 (1993) 757--795

    1993

  24. [32]

    Clozel, Repr\'esentations galoisiennes associ\'ees aux repr\'esentations automorphes autoduales de GL(n) , Publ

    L. Clozel, Repr\'esentations galoisiennes associ\'ees aux repr\'esentations automorphes autoduales de GL(n) , Publ. IHES 73 (1991) 97--145

    1991

  25. [33]

    Clozel, M

    L. Clozel, M. Harris, R. Taylor, Automorphy for some l -adic lifts of automorphic mod l Galois representations. Publ. IHES , 108 (2008) 1-181

    2008

  26. [34]

    Clozel, E

    L. Clozel, E. Ullmo, Equidistribution des points de Hecke , in: Contributions to Automorphic Forms, Geometry, and Number Theory , Johns Hopkins Univ. Press (2004) 193--254

    2004

  27. [35]

    J. W. Cogdell, I. I. Piatetski-Shapiro, F. Shahidi, Functoriality for the Quasisplit Classical Groups , in: On Certain L-functions , Clay Mathematics Proceedings, vol. 13, eds. J. Arthur, J. W. Cogdell, S. Gelbart, D. Goldberg, D. Ramakrishnan, J.-K. Yu, (West Lafayette, IN, 2...

    2007

  28. [36]

    Deligne, Valeurs de fonctions L et p\'eriodes d'int\'egrales, With an appendix by N

    P. Deligne, Valeurs de fonctions L et p\'eriodes d'int\'egrales, With an appendix by N. Koblitz and A. Ogus in: Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. , Vol. XXXIII, part II, AMS, Providence, R.I., (1979), pp. 313--346

    1979

  29. [37]

    Demazure, Motifs des vari\'et\'es alg\'ebriques , S\'em

    M. Demazure, Motifs des vari\'et\'es alg\'ebriques , S\'em. Bourbaki 1969-70, expos\'e 365, LNM 180 (1971)

    1969

  30. [38]

    T. J. Enright, Relative Lie algebra cohomology and unitary representations of complex Lie groups, Duke Math. J. 46 (1979) 513--525

    1979

  31. [39]

    Franke, Harmonic analysis in weighted L_2 -spaces, Ann

    J. Franke, Harmonic analysis in weighted L_2 -spaces, Ann. Sci. de l'ENS 4 ^e s\'erie tome 31 2 (1998) pp. 181--279

    1998

  32. [40]

    Franke, J

    J. Franke, J. Schwermer, A decomposition of spaces of automorphic forms, and the Eisenstein cohomology of arithmetic groups, Math. Ann. , 311 (1998), pp. 765-790

    1998

  33. [41]

    Friedberg, H

    S. Friedberg, H. Jacquet, Linear periods, J. reine angew. Math. 443 (1993) pp. 91--139

    1993

  34. [42]

    W. T. Gan, B. Gross, D. Prasad, Symplectic local root numbers, central critical L values, and restriction problems in the representation theory of classical groups. Sur les conjectures de Gross et Prasad. I. Ast\'erisque , 346 (2012), 1--109

    2012

  35. [43]

    W. T. Gan, B. Gross, D. Prasad, Restrictions of representations of classical groups: examples. Sur les conjectures de Gross et Prasad. I. Ast\'erisque , 346 (2012), 111--170

    2012

  36. [44]

    W. T. Gan, A. Ichino, The Gross-Prasad conjecture and local theta correspondence. Invent. Math. , 206 (2016) 705--799

    2016

  37. [45]

    W. T. Gan, A. Raghuram, Arithmeticity for periods of automorphic forms , in: Automorphic Representations and L-functions , Tata Inst. Fund. Res. Stu. Math. No. 22, Hindustan Book Agency, Mumbai (2013), pp. 187--229

    2013

  38. [46]

    Goodman, N

    R. Goodman, N. Wallach, Symmetry, representations, and invariants , Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 255 (Springer, Dordrecht, 2009)

    2009

  39. [47]

    Grobner, Rationality for isobaric automorphic representations: The CM-case, Monatshefte Math

    H. Grobner, Rationality for isobaric automorphic representations: The CM-case, Monatshefte Math. 187 (2019) 79--94

    2019

  40. [48]

    Grobner, Smooth-automorphic forms and smooth-automorphic representations , Series on Number Theory and Its Applications 17 (World Scientific Pbl., 2023)

    H. Grobner, Smooth-automorphic forms and smooth-automorphic representations , Series on Number Theory and Its Applications 17 (World Scientific Pbl., 2023)

    2023

  41. [49]

    Grobner, Residues of Eisenstein series and the automorphic cohomology of reductive groups, Compos

    H. Grobner, Residues of Eisenstein series and the automorphic cohomology of reductive groups, Compos. Math. 149 (2013) pp. 1061--1090

    2013

  42. [50]

    Grobner, A note on the arithetmic of residual automorphic representations of reductive groups, Math

    H. Grobner, A note on the arithetmic of residual automorphic representations of reductive groups, Math. Res. Letters 22 (2015) 93 -- 109

    2015

  43. [51]

    Grobner, M

    H. Grobner, M. Harris, Whittaker periods, motivic periods, and special values of tensor product L -functions, J. Inst. Math. Jussieu 15 (2016) 711--769

    2016

  44. [52]

    Grobner, M

    H. Grobner, M. Harris, E. Lapid, Whittaker rational structures and special values of the Asai L-function, Contemp. Math. 664 (2016) 119--134

    2016

  45. [53]

    Grobner, M

    H. Grobner, M. Harris, J. Lin, A. Raghuram, On motivic automorphic periods and Deligne's conjecture over CM-fields , in preparation (2025)

    2025

  46. [54]

    Grobner, M

    H. Grobner, M. Harris, J. Lin, Deligne's conjecture for automorphic motives over CM-fields, Part I , arXiv:1802.02958 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Grobner, M

    H. Grobner, M. Harris, J. Lin, Deligne's conjecture for automorphic motives over CM-fields, Part II , paper in preparation (2018)

    2018

  48. [56]

    Grobner, J

    H. Grobner, J. Lin, Special values of L -functions and the refined Gan-Gross-Prasad conjecture, Amer. J. Math. 143 (2021) 1--79

    2021

  49. [57]

    Grobner, A

    H. Grobner, A. Raghuram, On some arithmetic properties of automorphic forms of GL_m over a division algebra, Int. J. Number Theory 10 (2014) pp. 963--1013

    2014

  50. [58]

    Grobner, G

    H. Grobner, G. Sachdeva, Relations of rationality for special values of Rankin--Selberg L -functions on _n _m over CM-fields, Pacific J. Math. 308 (2020) 281--305

    2020

  51. [59]

    Grobner, R

    H. Grobner, R. Sebastian, Period relations for cuspidal automorphic forms of GSp (4) , Forum Math. 30 (2018) 581--598

    2018

  52. [60]

    Grobner, R

    H. Grobner, R. Sebastian, Period relations for cuspidal automorphic forms of GSp (4) and some more general aspects of rationality, notes (2017), available online http://homepage.univie.ac.at/harald.grobner/papers/OccultPeriods.pdf

    2017

  53. [61]

    Grobner, S

    H. Grobner, S. Z unar, On the notion of the parabolic and the cuspidal support of smooth-automorphic forms and smooth-automorphic representations, Monatshefte Math. 204 (2024) 455 --500

    2024

  54. [62]

    Grothendieck, Standard conjectures on algebraic cycles , Bomby Coll

    A. Grothendieck, Standard conjectures on algebraic cycles , Bomby Coll. on Alg. Geom. (1969), 193--199

    1969

  55. [63]

    Guerberoff, Period relations for automorphic forms on unitary groups and critical values of L-functions, Documenta Math

    L. Guerberoff, Period relations for automorphic forms on unitary groups and critical values of L-functions, Documenta Math. 21 (2016) 1397--1458

    2016

  56. [64]

    Guerberoff, J

    L. Guerberoff, J. Lin, Galois equivariance of critical values of L -functions for unitary groups , preprint (2016)

    2016

  57. [65]

    Harder, A

    G. Harder, A. Raghuram, Eisenstein cohomology for GL(n) and ratios of critical values of Rankin--Selberg L -functions, Ann. Math. Studies 203 (2020)

    2020

  58. [66]

    Harris, Automorphic forms of -cohomology type as coherent cohomology classes, J

    M. Harris, Automorphic forms of -cohomology type as coherent cohomology classes, J. Diff. Geom. , 32 (1990) 1--63

    1990

  59. [67]

    Harris, Non-vanishing of L -functions of 2 2 unitary groups, Forum Math

    M. Harris, Non-vanishing of L -functions of 2 2 unitary groups, Forum Math. , 5 (1993) 405--419

    1993

  60. [68]

    Harris, L -functions of 2 2 unitary groups and factorization of periods of H ilbert modular forms, J

    M. Harris, L -functions of 2 2 unitary groups and factorization of periods of H ilbert modular forms, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 6 (1993) 637--719

    1993

  61. [69]

    Harris, L -functions and periods of polarized regular motives, J

    M. Harris, L -functions and periods of polarized regular motives, J. reine angew. Math. 483 (1997) 75--161

    1997

  62. [70]

    Harris, Cohomological automorphic forms on unitary groups

    M. Harris, Cohomological automorphic forms on unitary groups. II. Period relations and values of L-functions , in: Harmonic analysis, group representations, automorphic forms and invariant theory , Lect. Notes Ser. Inst. Math. Sci. Natl. Univ. Singap. , 12 , World Sci. Publ., ...

    2007

  63. [71]

    Harris, Beilinson-Bernstein localization over and periods of automorphic forms, Int

    M. Harris, Beilinson-Bernstein localization over and periods of automorphic forms, Int. Math. Res. Notes 9 (2013) 2000--2053; Erratum, Int. Math. Res. Notes 3 (2020) 957--960

    2013

  64. [72]

    Harris, L-functions and periods of adjoint motives, Alg

    M. Harris, L-functions and periods of adjoint motives, Alg. Number Th. 17 (2013) 117--155

    2013

  65. [73]

    Harris, Testing rationality of coherent cohomology of Shimura varieties, Contemp

    M. Harris, Testing rationality of coherent cohomology of Shimura varieties, Contemp. Math. 614 (2014) 81--95

    2014

  66. [74]

    Harris, Shimura varieties for unitary groups and the doubling method, in Relative Trace Formulas (Proceedings of the Simons Symposium) (2021) 217--252

    M. Harris, Shimura varieties for unitary groups and the doubling method, in Relative Trace Formulas (Proceedings of the Simons Symposium) (2021) 217--252

    2021

  67. [75]

    Harris, S

    M. Harris, S. S. Kudla, The central critical value of the triple product L -functions, Ann. Math. 133 (1991) 605--672

    1991

  68. [76]

    Harris, J.-P

    M. Harris, J.-P. Labesse, Conditional Base Change for Unitary Groups, Asian J. Math. 8 (2004) 653--684

    2004

  69. [77]

    Harris, J.-S

    M. Harris, J.-S. Li, A Lefschetz property for subvarieties of Shimura varieties, J. Algeb. Geom. 7 (1998) 77--122

    1998

  70. [78]

    Harris, J

    M. Harris, J. Lin, Period relations and special values of Rankin-Selberg L-functions , in: Period Relations and Special Values of Rankin-Selberg L-Functions Progress in Math. (2017) 235--264

    2017

  71. [79]

    Harris, R

    M. Harris, R. Taylor, The geometry and cohomology of some simple Shimura varieties , Ann. of Math. Studies 151 , (Princeton Univ. Press, New Jersey, 2001)

    2001

  72. [80]

    R. N. Harris, The refined Gross-Prasad conjecture for unitary groups, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2 (2014) 303--389

    2014

  73. [81]

    He, On the Gan-Gross-Prasad Conjecture for U(p,q) , Invent

    H. He, On the Gan-Gross-Prasad Conjecture for U(p,q) , Invent. Math. 209 (2017) 837--884

    2017

  74. [82]

    Henniart, Une preuve simple des conjectures de Langlands pour GL(n) sur un corps p -adique, Invent

    G. Henniart, Une preuve simple des conjectures de Langlands pour GL(n) sur un corps p -adique, Invent. Math. 139 (2000) 439--455

    2000

  75. [83]

    Grobner, A

    H. Grobner, A. Raghuram, On the arithmetic of Shalika models and the critical values of L -functions for GL_ 2n , with an appendix by Wee Teck Gan, Amer. J. Math. 136 (2014) pp. 675--728

    2014

  76. [84]

    Harder, General aspects in the theory of modular symbols , in: S\'eminaire de Th\'eorie des Nombres, Paris 1981-82 , ed M.-J

    G. Harder, General aspects in the theory of modular symbols , in: S\'eminaire de Th\'eorie des Nombres, Paris 1981-82 , ed M.-J. Bertin, Progress in Mathematics 38 (Boston, Basel, Stuttgart 1983), pp. 73--88

    1981

  77. [85]

    G. Harder Period Integrals of Eisenstein Cohomology Classes and Special Values of Some L-Functions , in: Number Theory Related to Fermat's Last Theorem, Proceedings of the conference sponsored by the Vaughn Foundation , ed N. Koblitz, Progress in Mathematics 26 (Boston, 1982),...

    1982

  78. [86]

    Harder, A

    G. Harder, A. Raghuram, Eisenstein cohomology and ratios of critical values of Rankin-Selberg L-functions, Comptes Rendus Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 349 (2011) 719--724

    2011

  79. [87]

    Hida, On the critical values of L -functions of GL (2) and GL (2) GL (2) , Duke Math

    H. Hida, On the critical values of L -functions of GL (2) and GL (2) GL (2) , Duke Math. J. 74 (1994) pp. 431--529

    1994

  80. [88]

    Jacquet, I

    H. Jacquet, I. Piatetski-Shapiro, J. Shalika, Automorphic forms on GL (3) II, Ann. Math. 109 (1979) pp. 213--258

    1979

  81. [89]

    Jacquet, I

    H. Jacquet, I. Piatetski-Shapiro, J. Shalika, Conducteur des repr\'esentations du groupe lin\'eaire, Math. Ann. 256 (1981) pp. 199--214

    1981

  82. [90]

    Jacquet, J

    H. Jacquet, J. Shalika, On Euler Products and the Classification of Automorphic Representations II, Amer. J. Math. 103 (1981) 777--815

    1981

  83. [91]

    Jiang, L

    D. Jiang, L. Zhang, On the Non-vanishing of the Central Value of Certain L -functions: Unitary Groups, J. EMS 22 (2020) 1759--1783

    2020

  84. [92]

    Kaletha, A

    T. Kaletha, A. Minguez, S. W. Shin, P.-J. White, Endoscopic classification of representations: inner forms of unitary groups , preprint (2014)

    2014

  85. [93]

    H. Kim, M. Krishnamurthy, Base change lift for odd unitary groups. Functional analysis VIII, Various Publ. Ser. (Aarhus) , 47 (Aarhus Univ., Aarhus, 2004), 116--125

    2004

  86. [94]

    H. Kim, M. Krishnamurthy, Stable base change lift from unitary groups to _n , Int. Math. Res. Pap. 1 (2005) 1--52

    2005

  87. [95]

    Kisin, S

    M. Kisin, S. W. Shin, Y. Zhu, The stable trace formula for certain Shimura varieties of abelian type, preprint (2021)

    2021

  88. [96]

    S. L. Kleiman, The Standard Conjectures , n: Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. , Vol. LV, part 1, AMS, Providence, R.I., (1994), pp. 3--20

    1994

  89. [97]

    J.-P. Labesse, Changement de base CM et s\'eries discr\`etes , in: On the Stabilization of the Trace Formula , Vol.\ I, eds.\ L.\ Clozel, M.\ Harris, J.-P.\ Labesse, B.-C.\ Ng\^ o, International Press, Boston, MA, 2011, pp. 429--470

    2011

  90. [98]

    Aquivalenze Hermitscher formen \

    W. Landherr, \"Aquivalenze Hermitscher formen \"uber einem beliebigen algebraischen Zahlk\"orper, Abh. Math. Sem. Hamb. , 11 (1936), 245--248

    1936

  91. [99]

    R. P. Langlands, Automorphic representations, Shimura varieties, and motives. Ein M\"archen in: Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. , Vol. XXXIII, part II, AMS, Providence, R.I., (1979), pp. 205--246

    1979

  92. [100]

    E. M. Lapid, and S. Rallis, On the local factors of representations of classical groups. Automorphic representations, L-functions and applications: progress and prospects , Ohio State Univ. Math. Res. Inst. Publ., 11 , de Gruyter, Berlin, (2005) 309--359

    2005

  93. [101]

    Li, Nonvanishing theorems for the cohomology of certain arithmetic quotients, J

    J.-S. Li, Nonvanishing theorems for the cohomology of certain arithmetic quotients, J. reine angew. Math. 428 (1992) 177--217

    1992

  94. [102]

    Lin, Period relations for automorphic induction and applications I, Comptes rendus Math

    J. Lin, Period relations for automorphic induction and applications I, Comptes rendus Math. 353 (2015), pp. 95-100

    2015

  95. [103]

    Lin, An automorphic version of the Deligne conjecture, C

    J. Lin, An automorphic version of the Deligne conjecture, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 691 (2017) 181--202

    2017

  96. [104]

    Lin, Factorization of arithmetic automorphic periods , preprint (2017)

    J. Lin, Factorization of arithmetic automorphic periods , preprint (2017)

    2017

  97. [105]

    Lin, Period relations for automorphic induction and applications, I

    J. Lin, Period relations for automorphic induction and applications, I. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris , 353 (2015) 95--100

    2015

  98. [106]

    Lin, Special values of automorphic L-functions for GL_n GL_ n' over CM fields, factorization and functoriality of arithmetic automorphic periods , th\`ese de docotorat, (2015)

    J. Lin, Special values of automorphic L-functions for GL_n GL_ n' over CM fields, factorization and functoriality of arithmetic automorphic periods , th\`ese de docotorat, (2015)

    2015

  99. [107]

    Lin, Special values of Rankin-Selberg L-functions over CM fields , in preparation (2022)

    J. Lin, Special values of Rankin-Selberg L-functions over CM fields , in preparation (2022)

    2022

  100. [108]

    J. S. Milne, Canonical Models of (Mixed) Shimura Varieties and Automorphic Vector Bundles , in: Automorphic forms, Shimura varieties, and L -functions , Vol. I, Perspect. Math., vol. 10, eds. L. Clozel and J. S. Milne, (Ann Arbor, MI, 1988) Academic Press, Boston, MA, 1990, pp...

    1988

  101. [109]

    J. S. Milne, J. Suh, Nonhomeomorphic conjugates of connected Shimura varieties, Amer. J. Math. 132 (2010) 731--750

    2010

  102. [110]

    A. M\'inguez, Unramified representations of unitary groups , in: On the Stabilization of the Trace Formula , Vol.\ I, eds.\ L.\ Clozel, M.\ Harris, J.-P.\ Labesse, B.-C.\ Ng\^ o, International Press, Boston, MA, 2011, pp. 389--410

    2011

  103. [111]

    M glin, J.-L

    C. M glin, J.-L. Waldspurger, Le spectre r\'esiduel de GL(n), Ann. Sci. \'Ecole Norm. Sup. 22 (1989) 605--674

    1989

  104. [112]

    C.M glin, J.-L. Waldspurger, La conjecture locale de Gross-Prasad pour les groupes sp\'eciaux orthogonaux : le cas g\'en\'eral, in Sur les conjectures de Gross et Prasad, II , Ast\'erisque , 347 (2012)

    2012

  105. [113]

    C. P. Mok, Endoscopic classification of representations of quasi-split unitary groups , Memoirs of the AMS 235 (2014)

    2014

  106. [114]

    Morel, On the cohomology of certain non-compact Shimura varieties , Ann

    S. Morel, On the cohomology of certain non-compact Shimura varieties , Ann. Math. Studies 173 (Princeton Univ. Press, New Jersey, 2010)

    2010

  107. [115]

    Morris, The Unknown Known , film (2013)

    E. Morris, The Unknown Known , film (2013)

    2013

  108. [116]

    Mahnkopf, Cohomology of arithmetic groups, parabolic subgroups and the special values of automorphic L -Functions on GL(n) , J

    J. Mahnkopf, Cohomology of arithmetic groups, parabolic subgroups and the special values of automorphic L -Functions on GL(n) , J. de l'Institut de Math\'ematiques de Jussieu 4 (2005) pp. 553--637

    2005

  109. [117]

    Mahnkopf, Modular symbols and values of L -functions on GL_3 , J

    J. Mahnkopf, Modular symbols and values of L -functions on GL_3 , J. reine angew. Math. 497 (1998) pp. 91--112

    1998

  110. [118]

    Y. I. Manin, Non-archimedean integration and Jacquet--Langlands p -adic l -functions, Russian Math. Surveys 31 (1976) pp. 5--57

    1976

  111. [119]

    M glin, J.-L

    C. M glin, J.-L. Waldspurger, Spectral decomposition and Eisenstein series , Cambridge Univ. Press (1995)

    1995

  112. [120]

    Raghuram, Critical values for Rankin-Selberg L-functions for GL(n) GL(n-1) and the symmetric cube L-functions for GL(2) , Forum Math

    A. Raghuram, Critical values for Rankin-Selberg L-functions for GL(n) GL(n-1) and the symmetric cube L-functions for GL(2) , Forum Math. 28 (2016) 457--489

    2016

  113. [121]

    Raghuram, Eisenstein cohomology for GL(N) and the special values of Rankin-Selberg L-functions - II , preprint (2020)

    A. Raghuram, Eisenstein cohomology for GL(N) and the special values of Rankin-Selberg L-functions - II , preprint (2020)

    2020

  114. [122]

    Raghuram, F

    A. Raghuram, F. Shahidi, On certain period relations for cuspidal automorphic forms on _n , Int. Math. Res. Not. Vol. (2008), doi:10.1093/imrn/rnn077

    2008 doi

  115. [123]

    Rohlfs, Projective limits of locally symmetric spaces and cohomology, J

    J. Rohlfs, Projective limits of locally symmetric spaces and cohomology, J. Reine Angew. Math. 479 (1996) pp. 149--182

    1996

  116. [124]

    S. A. Salamanca-Riba, On the unitary dual of real reductive Lie groups and the A_ q ( ) modules: The strongly regular case, Duke Math. J. 96 (1998) 521--546

    1998

  117. [125]

    Schwermer, Cohomology of arithmetic groups, automorphic forms and L -functions , in: Cohomology of Arithmetic Groups and Automorphic Forms , eds

    J. Schwermer, Cohomology of arithmetic groups, automorphic forms and L -functions , in: Cohomology of Arithmetic Groups and Automorphic Forms , eds. J.-P. Labesse, J. Schwermer, Lecture Notes in Math. 1447 (Springer, 1990) pp. 1--29

    1990

  118. [126]

    Shahidi, Eisenstein series and Automorphic L -functions , Colloquium publications 58 , AMS, (2010)

    F. Shahidi, Eisenstein series and Automorphic L -functions , Colloquium publications 58 , AMS, (2010)

    2010

  119. [127]

    Rallis, I

    S. Rallis, I. I. Piatetski-Shapiro, L -functions for the classical groups , in Explicit constructions of automorphic L -functions , Lecture Notes in Math. , 1254 Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (1987) 1--52

    1987

  120. [128]

    Serre, Abelian l -Adic Representations and Elliptic Curves, McGill University Lecture Notes (1989)

    J.-P. Serre, Abelian l -Adic Representations and Elliptic Curves, McGill University Lecture Notes (1989)

    1989

  121. [129]

    Shimura, On the field of definition for a field of automorphic functions, Ann

    G. Shimura, On the field of definition for a field of automorphic functions, Ann. of Math. , 80 (1964) 160--189

    1964

  122. [130]

    S. W. Shin, Galois representations arising from some compact Shimura varieties, Ann. Math 173 (2011) 1645--1741

    2011

  123. [131]

    S. W. Shin, On the cohomological base change for unitary similitude groups, appendix to: W. Goldring, Galois representations associated to holomorphic limits of discrete series I: Unitary Groups , Compos. Math. 150 (2014) 191--228

    2014

  124. [132]

    Shahidi, On certain L -functions, Amer

    F. Shahidi, On certain L -functions, Amer. J. Math. 103 (1981) 297--355

    1981

  125. [133]

    Shimura, The special values of the zeta functions associated with Hilbert modular forms, Duke Math

    G. Shimura, The special values of the zeta functions associated with Hilbert modular forms, Duke Math. J. 45 (1978) pp. 637--679

    1978

  126. [134]

    Shimura, On the critical values of certain Dirichlet series and the periods of automorphic forms, Invent

    G. Shimura, On the critical values of certain Dirichlet series and the periods of automorphic forms, Invent. Math. 94 (1988) pp. 245--306

    1988

  127. [135]

    Serre, Abelian l-Adic Representations and Elliptic Curves , Advanced book classic series, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company (1989)

    J.-P. Serre, Abelian l-Adic Representations and Elliptic Curves , Advanced book classic series, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company (1989)

    1989

  128. [136]

    Sun, Cohomologically induced distinguished representations and a non-vanishing hypothesis for algebraicity of critical L -values , arXiv:1111.2636 preprint (2011)

    B. Sun, Cohomologically induced distinguished representations and a non-vanishing hypothesis for algebraicity of critical L -values , arXiv:1111.2636 preprint (2011)

    2011 arXiv

  129. [137]

    D. A. Vogan Jr., Unitarizability of certain series of representations, Ann. of Math. 120 (1984) 51-90

    1984

  130. [138]

    D. A. Vogan Jr., The unitary dual of GL(n) over an Archimedean field, Invent. Math. 83 (1986) pp. 449--505

    1986

  131. [139]

    D. A. Vogan Jr., G. J. Zuckerman, Unitary representations with nonzero cohomology, Comp. Math. 53 (1984) 51--90

    1984

  132. [140]

    Waldspurger, Quelques propri\'et\'es arithm\'etiques de certaines formes automorphes sur GL(2), Comp

    J.-L. Waldspurger, Quelques propri\'et\'es arithm\'etiques de certaines formes automorphes sur GL(2), Comp. Math. 54 (1985) 121--171

    1985

  133. [141]

    Wallach, On the constant term of a square-integrable automorphic form , in: Operator algebras and group representations , Vol

    N. Wallach, On the constant term of a square-integrable automorphic form , in: Operator algebras and group representations , Vol. II (Neptun, 1980), Monographs Stud. Math. 18 (1984), pp. 227-237

    1980

  134. [142]

    Weil, On a certain type of characters of the id\`ele-class group of an algebraic number field

    A. Weil, On a certain type of characters of the id\`ele-class group of an algebraic number field. , in: Proceeding of the international symposium on algebraic number theory, Tokyo & Nikko, 1955, Science Council of Japan, Tokyo (1956), pp. 1--7

    1955

  135. [143]

    Xue, On the global Gan-Gross-Prasad conjecture for unitary groups: Approximating smooth transfer of Jacquet--Rallis, J

    H. Xue, On the global Gan-Gross-Prasad conjecture for unitary groups: Approximating smooth transfer of Jacquet--Rallis, J. Reine Angew. Math. (2019) 65--100

    2019

  136. [144]

    Yoshida, On the zeta functions of Shimura varieties and periods of Hilbert modular forms, Duke Math

    H. Yoshida, On the zeta functions of Shimura varieties and periods of Hilbert modular forms, Duke Math. J. 75 (1994) 121--191

    1994

  137. [145]

    Yoshida, On a conjecture of Shimura concerning periods of Hilbert modular forms

    H. Yoshida, On a conjecture of Shimura concerning periods of Hilbert modular forms. Amer. J. Math. , 117 (1995) 1019--1038

    1995

  138. [146]

    Zhang, Automorphic period and the central value of Ranking-Selberg L -function, J

    W. Zhang, Automorphic period and the central value of Ranking-Selberg L -function, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 27 (2014), 541--612

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.