Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 79 references

Octo's Heartland: Supporting Children with Congenital Heart Disease through Digital Health Education

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that observation-first usability testing with 30 children with congenital heart disease produced the concrete design criteria behind Octo's Heartland, a metaphor-based serious game that teaches heart anatomy and healthy…

desk verdict A useful, honest usability study of a CHD education app; the design refinement is credible, but the 'comprehension outcomes' claim in the abstract outruns the data. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.02537 v1 pith:NPABVXS4 submitted 2025-09-02 cs.HC

Irene Zeng , Neda Barbazi , Ji Youn Shin , Gurumurthy Hiremath , Carlye Anne Lauff This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HC
keywords congenitalheartdiseaseseriousgamespediatrichealtheducationusabilitytestingwithchildrenparticipatorydesignmetaphor-basedlearningliteracyiterative
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Children with congenital heart disease (CHD) rarely get educational materials designed for them, and younger children are usually left out of usability research. This paper argues that they can be included: two rounds of testing with 30 children at a medically supported camp, using observation and open-ended play rather than think-aloud tasks, produced a clear set of design changes. Those changes shaped Octo's Heartland, a serious game in which a heart-shaped island, a train, and metaphor-based activities teach cardiac anatomy, four CHD conditions, and healthy habits. The paper's contribution is a worked example of translating child reactions, verbal and non-verbal, into usability and educational design criteria, plus a description of the redesigned app ready for clinical and home testing.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is metaphor-based gameplay organized around a heart-shaped island traversed by train, with each CHD condition mapped to a physical metaphor children can manipulate: pulmonary stenosis as a narrowed train track to widen, coarctation of the aorta as a blocked river to clear, and septal defects as openings in a house wall to patch. The evaluation and redesign are carried by four game-based learning principles from prior work—meaningful interactivity, immersiveness, effective feedback, and freedom of exploration—which the paper uses both as a lens for coding observations and as the source of the final design criteria.

What would settle it

Give two comparable groups of children with CHD the redesigned Octo's Heartland and a non-game picture booklet covering the same four conditions, then measure heart knowledge before and after; if the game group shows no larger gain, the claim that metaphor-based gameplay improves comprehension is not supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that child-engaged usability testing, not expert opinion, should drive the design of pediatric health-education technology, and that this is feasible even for children aged 4-10 with complex medical conditions. In the reported sessions, children's navigation struggles, pacing preferences, excitement, and confusion were coded into themes and then turned into four design criteria: intuitive navigation, flexible pacing, accessible design, and storytelling or problem-solving that keeps an uplifting tone. The resulting application presents four CHD conditions—ventricular septal defect, pulmonary stenosis, coarctation of the aorta, and atrial septal defect—each as a three-level metaphor-based journey, such as widening a train track, clearing a river, or patching a house wall. The paper reports that problem-solving activities were the most appealing, nature metaphors were the best understood, and children wanted more guidance and rewards, all of which are now reflected in the final activity structure.

Load-bearing premise

The single load-bearing premise is that what children do and say during a 15-minute play session—facial expressions, repeated actions, and short answers—is valid evidence of what they understand about the medical content, even though no knowledge test was given.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Children as young as four can produce usable design feedback through observation-based testing when think-aloud is replaced by watching choices, expressions, and repeated actions.
  • The design criteria now specify a five-stop heart-shaped island, one stop per CHD condition, with three metaphor-based levels per stop.
  • The four tested conditions—ventricular septal defect, pulmonary stenosis, coarctation of the aorta, and atrial septal defect—form the curriculum of the finalized prototype.
  • The app's flexible navigation, star rewards, and progressive difficulty are intended to balance structured learning with free exploration.
  • The next phase will deploy the redesigned app in home and clinical settings with children and caregivers to test its real-world effectiveness.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because some children struggled to connect the metaphors to their medical meaning, a natural next test is to add explicit verbal narration that states what each metaphor means for the child's own heart, and compare comprehension against the current version.
  • The same design criteria—intuitive navigation, flexible pacing, storytelling, and an uplifting tone—could be lifted directly into educational apps for other pediatric chronic conditions such as asthma or type 1 diabetes.
  • Observed engagement may be a proxy for interest rather than understanding; a paired pre- and post-knowledge measure would clarify whether the stars-and-levels system actually produces health literacy gains.
  • The hybrid Octo plush toy and app could serve as a shared communication object during clinic visits, letting children show clinicians what they understand about their condition.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper reports an iterative design and usability testing study for "Octo's Heartland," a metaphor-based digital application intended to support health literacy, engagement, and comprehension for children with congenital heart disease (CHD) aged 4–10. The work is part of a multi-phase participatory design project that also includes a plush toy. In a preliminary study at Camp Odayin, 12 children interacted with an earlier prototype and provided open-ended feedback; in a subsequent usability test, 18 children explored four newly designed activities with different narrative metaphors (Heart Island, Train, Cardia Kingdom, Matching Game). Thematic analysis of observations and transcripts informed design criteria for usability, educational, and emotional outcomes, and led to a final design organized as a train ride through a heart-shaped island with five stops representing four CHD conditions. The paper claims findings about usability, engagement, and comprehension, and proposes serious game (SG) design principles for supporting health literacy in young children with CHD.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper makes a useful contribution to participatory design and serious game research for a population rarely included in design and evaluation: young children with CHD. The strengths are concrete and should be credited: the study was conducted with IRB approval in a medically supported camp, engaged children as young as 4 in open-ended exploration rather than task-based protocols, involved 30 children across two phases, and translated qualitative insights into a detailed, coherent final design that is clearly grounded in the four SG principles cited from Kucher. The paper also addresses a genuine gap in child-focused CHD education. However, the significance is weakened by the overclaimed "comprehension outcomes" and by a usability-testing sample that includes many children outside the stated target age range. The design recommendations may be plausible, but the evidence as presented does not support knowledge-acquisition or health-literacy claims without further measurement.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract; §4.1] The abstract states that findings highlight "usability, engagement, and comprehension outcomes," and §4.1 says the team observed "CHD content comprehension," but no comprehension instrument, knowledge measure, pre/post test, or task-performance metric is described anywhere in the protocol. The only data are 15-minute sessions, activity-choice observations, affective reactions, and short verbal answers. In §4.2 the paper itself supplies counter-evidence: a participant said "I don't know much about anything" during the matching game, and "some children struggled to connect" nature metaphors to medical content. Observed engagement and brief verbal responses cannot support the claimed comprehension or health-literacy outcomes. Please either add a real knowledge measure (e.g., a short pre/post quiz, parent or clinician rating, or task-based comprehension check) or reframe the claims to "usability, engagement, and exploratory indications of understanding" and explicitly report comprehension as anecdotal rather than measured.
  2. [§4.1; Table 1] The usability-testing sample is described as "Eighteen children with CHD participated (ages 6–16)", yet the paper's target population is ages 4–10 and §3.1 states the study focus is ages 4–10. Only 10 of the 18 participants are within the target range, and eight are aged 11–16, including a 16-year-old. Design implications drawn from the full sample are then applied to the final design for 4–10-year-olds without any age-based breakdown of which feedback came from which age group. Please report results separately for the target-age subgroup versus older participants, and justify how feedback from adolescents informs design decisions for younger children, or restrict the design implications to the ages actually represented.
  3. [§3.2; §4.2] Thematic coding is described as handwritten notes and transcripts "coded sentence by sentence" and organized in two stages, but no coding reliability or trustworthiness information is provided: there is no second coder, no inter-rater reliability or consensus process, no codebook, and no audit trail beyond the list of themes. For a qualitative design study, this is acceptable if the analysis is framed as the research team's interpretive synthesis to guide redesign, but the paper presents the coded themes as findings (e.g., "Usability findings:", "Educational and Emotional findings:"). Please state the coding procedure transparently (who coded, how disagreements were resolved, whether the codebook evolved) or reframe the results as designer-led analysis rather than independent qualitative findings.
  4. [§5.1; §5.2] The link between the collected data and the final design criteria is asserted but not demonstrated. Section 5.1 lists "Design Criteria Based on Types of CHD" and §5.2 describes the final features, but there is no traceable mapping from specific participant observations or quotes to specific criteria or design decisions. For example, the claim that "problem-solving based activities like the train puzzle were the most appealing" is stated in §4.2, but no frequency counts, illustrative quotes, or comparison across the four activities are provided to show why it was most appealing or how that led to the train-based navigation in the final design. Given that RQ2 asks how insights are translated into design improvements, the authors should provide a small traceability table or at least explicitly cite representative data points that support each final design criterion.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract; §4.2] The phrase "comprehension outcomes" also appears in the abstract's last sentence; even if the major measurement concern is addressed, the wording should be softened to avoid implying a formal learning assessment was performed.
  2. [§3.1] The sentence "The testing protocol followed principles from Andersen et al. [4], accommodating short attention spans (<30 min)" is slightly under-specified because the sessions themselves are described as "around 15 min" later in the same paragraph; please state the planned session duration explicitly and consistently.
  3. [§4.2; Figure 3–6] The final design section would benefit from at least one figure per metaphor world (Pulmonary Pathway, Aorta River, Ventricle Village, Atria Leak) to help readers assess the claimed metaphor–medical content alignment; currently Figures 3–6 show only the home screen, learning cards, and two of the worlds in partial views.
  4. [§2.2; §4.2] The paper uses "Kucher [37]" for the four SG principles, but the reference list entry does not provide a full first name or publisher information; please complete the bibliographic details to match ACM style.
  5. [§5.2] The final design description mixes future tense ("children begin," "players select") with present tense ("The Aorta River mirrors," "Users earn stars"); please unify the tense for clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the design iteration is self-contained; the comprehension claim is an evidentiary limitation, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: observe children using the prototype, thematically code the observations, derive design criteria, implement final design features. Each step is grounded in the reported usability sessions rather than in a fitted parameter, a self-referential definition, or a prior conclusion of the same authors. The abstract's 'comprehension outcomes' are inferred from the same sessions used to drive redesign, which is a construct-validity limitation (no pre/post knowledge measure or independent comprehension instrument is described), but it is not a circular reduction: the paper makes no quantitative prediction, and 'comprehension' is not defined in terms of the claimed outcome. The paper even reports counter-evidence, e.g. 'some children struggled to connect them to medical content' and a participant saying 'I don't know much about anything,' which shows the findings are not manufactured by construction. Self-citations [8,9] only contextualize the multi-phase research program and the literature gap; they are not load-bearing for the usability findings or design implications. No step reduces by definition to its own inputs, so no circularity step meets the quoted-reduction standard.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 1 invented entities

No numeric parameters are fitted; the design decisions (e.g., three levels per activity, four CHD conditions) are qualitative design choices, not numbers fitted to data. The paper's central assumptions all concern the validity of qualitative observation as a proxy for learning and the effectiveness of metaphor-based design, neither of which is independently verified.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Serious game design principles from Kucher (2021): meaningful interactivity, immersiveness, feedback, and freedom of exploration improve children's learning and engagement.
    Invoked in Section 2.2 and used to structure all four test activities; no independent validation within this study.
  • domain assumption Observational data and children's self-reports during short usability sessions are valid indicators of usability, engagement, and comprehension.
    Sections 3.1 and 4.1 use non-verbal cues and open-ended questions as primary evidence; no comprehension instrument or follow-up assessment is used.
  • domain assumption Metaphor-based representations (river, house, train track) convey cardiac anatomy and CHD conditions accurately to children ages 4-10 without creating misconceptions.
    Section 5.2 builds the final design on these metaphors; Section 4.2 reports that some children struggled to link metaphors to medical content.
invented entities (1)
  • Octo's Heartland app (heart-shaped island, Octo character, four metaphor worlds)
    purpose: Digital educational intervention to teach CHD children about anatomy, conditions, and health habits through gameplay.
    The app is the designed product of the study; no external evidence is provided that the metaphor worlds improve or fail to improve health literacy. It is an artifact, not an explanatory entity, and no controlled outcome data exists.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Octo's Heartland: Supporting Children with Congenital Heart Disease through Digital Health Education." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NPABVXS4

@misc{pith2026250902537,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Octo's Heartland: Supporting Children with Congenital Heart Disease through Digital Health Education},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NPABVXS4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.02537}
}
read the original abstract

Children with congenital heart disease (CHD) often face challenges that require them to understand complex medical information from an early age in order to support lifelong care and improve health outcomes. However, prior research has rarely included young children in designing and evaluating digital tools to support health education using developmentally appropriate strategies. This study is part of a multi-phase research involving participatory design (PD), user testing, and iterative development. We present the design and refinement of a digital application that introduces basic information about CHD, including heart anatomy and healthy habits, through metaphor-based gameplay. User testing sessions with 30 children informed the redesign of interactive activities aligned with specific health conditions. Findings highlight usability, engagement, and comprehension outcomes and reveal design opportunities for supporting health literacy through serious game (SG) principles. These results inform the next phase, including further testing, refinement, and deployment in home and clinical settings.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.02537 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Research and Design Process of Octo Digital App. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Camp Odayin Preliminary Sessions (October 19th, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Octo’s Heartland Home Screen (left); Heart Central [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Explaining Track Metaphor (left); Pulmonary Path [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Explaining River Metaphor (left); Aorta River Level [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Explaining House Metaphor ("downstairs") (left); [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Camp Odayin About

    2025. Camp Odayin About. https://campodayin.org/about/

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    Dionysis Alexandridis, Sander C. J. Bakkes, Sanne L. Nijhof, Elise van de Putte, and Remco C. Veltkamp. 2023. First Experiments with an Applied Gaming Intervention for reducing Loneliness of Children with Chronic Illness: Lessons Learned. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (New York, NY, USA, 2023-04-12...

    arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Alotaibi

    Manar S. Alotaibi. 2024. Game-based learning in early childhood education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 15 (2024). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1307881 Publisher: Frontiers. Octo’s Heartland: Supporting Children with Congenital Heart Disease through Digital Health Education CSCW Companion ’25, October 18–22, 2025, Bergen, Norway

    work page arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Malene Hjortboe Andersen, Md Saifuddin Khalid, and Eva Irene Brooks. 2017. Considerations and Methods for Usability Testing with Children. In Interactivity, Game Creation, Design, Learning, and Innovation (2017). Springer, Cham, 228–238. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-55834-9_27 ISSN: 1867-822X

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-55834-9_27 2017

  5. [5]

    Glickstein, Stéphanie M

    Bhawna Arya, Julie S. Glickstein, Stéphanie M. Levasseur, and Ismeé A. Williams

    work page

  6. [6]

    Afsoon Asadzadeh, Hassan Shahrokhi, Behzad Shalchi, Zhila Khamnian, and Peyman Rezaei-Hachesu. 2024. Serious educational games for children: A com- prehensive framework. 10, 6 (2024). doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28108 Publisher: Elsevier

    work page doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28108 2024

  7. [7]

    Andria Banker and Carlye Lauff. 2022. Usability testing with children: History of best practices, comparison of methods & gaps in literature. (2022). https://dl. designresearchsociety.org/drs-conference-papers/drs2022/researchpapers/225

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Neda Barbazi, Ji Youn Shin, Gurumurthy Hiremath, and Carlye Anne Lauff. 2025. Developing Assessments for Key Stakeholders in Pediatric Congenital Heart Disease: Qualitative Pilot Study to Inform Designing of a Medical Education Toy. 9, 1 (2025), e63818. doi:10.2196/63818

    doi:10.2196/63818 2025

Show all 79 references
  1. [9]

    Neda Barbazi, Ji Youn Shin, Gurumurthy Hiremath, and Carlye Anne Lauff. 2025. Exploring Health Educational Interventions for Children With Congenital Heart Disease: Scoping Review. 8, 1 (2025), e64814. doi:10.2196/64814

    2025 doi

  2. [10]

    Najmeh Behnamnia, Amirrudin Kamsin, Maizatul Akmar Binti Ismail, and Siavash A. Hayati. 2023. A review of using digital game-based learning for preschoolers. 10, 4 (2023), 603–636. doi:10.1007/s40692-022-00240-0 Company: Springer Distributor: Springer Institution: Springer Lab...

    2023 doi

  3. [11]

    Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2012. Thematic analysis. In APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. American Psychological Association, 57–71. doi:10.1037/13620-004

    2012 doi

  4. [12]

    Katharina Buckmayer, Filipa Rocha, Elisa Rubegni, Reem Talhouk, Hugo Nicolau, and Ana Cristina Pires. 2024. Participatory Design with Young Children: Failures, Challenges, and Successes. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference (New York...

    2024

  5. [13]

    Joseph Burns, Clarerita Higgins, Madhusudan Ganigara, Becca Kalivas, and Amy Basken. 2022. Health literacy in CHD. 32, 9 (2022), 1369–1372. doi:10.1017/ S1047951122001020

    2022

  6. [14]

    Michelle Cash, Barbara Giambra, Lara Stone, Melissa Magness, Kimberly Luebbe, Samantha Moore, Ryan Moore, Russel Hirsch, Kimberley Miles, Michael Kim, and Paul J. Critser. 2025. Hank the Heart and Animation-Based Education for Pulmonary Hypertension. 15, 2 (2025), e70072. doi:...

    2025 doi

  7. [15]

    CDC. 2024. Data and Statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/heart-defects/data/index. html

    2024

  8. [16]

    Yoon Jeong Cha, Alice Wou, Arpita Saxena, Joyce Lee, Mark W Newman, and Sun Young Park. 2023. It’s Like an Educated Guessing Game: Parents’ Strategies for Collaborative Diabetes Management with Their Children. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Compu...

    2023

  9. [17]

    Nathalie Charlier, Nele Zupancic, Steffen Fieuws, Kris Denhaerynck, Bieke Za- man, and Philip Moons. 2016. Serious games for improving knowledge and self-management in young people with chronic conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 23, 1 (2016), 230–239. doi:10.10...

    2016 doi

  10. [18]

    Lauren S. H. Chong, Dominic A. Fitzgerald, Jonathan C. Craig, Karine E. Manera, Camilla S. Hanson, David Celermajer, Julian Ayer, Nadine A. Kasparian, and Alli- son Tong. 2018. Children’s experiences of congenital heart disease: a systematic re- view of qualitative studies. 17...

    2018 doi

  11. [19]

    Aurora Constantin, Jessica Korte, Jerry Alan Fails, Judith Good, Cristina Adriana Alexandru, Mihaela Dragomir, Helen Pain, Juan Pablo Hourcade, Eva Eriksson, Annalu Waller, and Franca Garzotto. 2019. Pushing the Boundaries of Partic- ipatory Design with Children with Special N...

    2019

  12. [20]

    Eduardo Filgueiras Damasceno, Armando Paulo da Silva, and José Dias Barbosa

  13. [21]

    Alexandra Delmas. 2017. Serious game’s participatory design and evaluation for asthma kids. In Proceedings of the 29th Conference on l’Interaction Homme- Machine (New York, NY, USA, 2017-08-29) (IHM ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, 61–71. doi:10.1145/3132129.3132145

    2017

  14. [22]

    Allison Druin. 1999. Cooperative inquiry: developing new technologies for children with children. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 1999-05-01) (CHI ’99). Association for Computing Machinery, 592–599. doi:10.1145/...

    1999

  15. [23]

    Alison Druin. 2002. The role of children in the design of new technology. 21, 1 (2002), 1–25. doi:10.1080/01449290110108659 Publisher: Taylor & Francis _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290110108659

    2002 doi

  16. [24]

    Gallud, and Víctor M

    Iván Durango, Alicia Carrascosa, José A. Gallud, and Víctor M. R. Penichet

  17. [25]

    Christopher Frauenberger, Good Judith, and Wendy Keay-Bright. 2011. Designing technology for children with special needs: bridging perspectives through partic- ipatory design. 7, 1 (2011), 1–28. doi:10.1080/15710882.2011.587013 Publisher: Taylor & Francis _eprint: https://doi....

    2011

  18. [26]

    Simone Ghisio, Paolo Alborno, Erica Volta, Monica Gori, and Gualtiero Volpe

  19. [27]

    Guedes, Irene Zanardi, Marilina Mastrogiuseppe, Stefania Span, and Monica Landoni

    Leandro S. Guedes, Irene Zanardi, Marilina Mastrogiuseppe, Stefania Span, and Monica Landoni. 2024. Scaffolding for Inclusive Co-design: Supporting People with Cognitive and Learning Disabilities. InUniversal Access in Human-Computer Interaction: 18th International Conference,...

    2024 doi

  20. [28]

    Mona Leigh Guha, Allison Druin, and Jerry Alan Fails. 2008. Designing with and for children with special needs: an inclusionary model. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Interaction design and children (New York, NY, USA, 2008-06-11) (IDC ’08). Association f...

    2008

  21. [29]

    Martin Henschke, David Hobbs, and Brett Wilkinson. 2012. Developing serious games for children with cerebral palsy: case study and pilot trial. In Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference (New York, NY, USA, 2012-11-26) (OzCHI ’12). Association ...

    2012

  22. [30]

    Arriaga, and Gregory D

    Hwajung Hong, Hee Young Jeong, Rosa I. Arriaga, and Gregory D. Abowd. 2010. TriggerHunter: designing an educational game for families with asthmatic chil- dren. In CHI ’10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2010-04-10) (CHI EA ’10). As...

    2010

  23. [31]

    Giannakos, Ole A

    Marikken Høiseth, Michail N. Giannakos, Ole A. Alsos, Letizia Jaccheri, and Jonas Asheim. 2013. Designing healthcare games and applications for toddlers. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (New York, NY, USA, 2013-06-24) (IDC...

    2013

  24. [32]

    Hee Young Jeong and Rosa I. Arriaga. 2009. Using an ecological framework to design mobile technologies for pediatric asthma management. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (New York, NY, USA, 2009-0...

    2009

  25. [33]

    Kato, Steve W

    Pamela M. Kato, Steve W. Cole, Andrew S. Bradlyn, and Brad H. Pollock. 2008. A Video Game Improves Behavioral Outcomes in Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer: A Randomized Trial. 122, 2 (2008), e305–e317. doi:10.1542/peds. 2007-3134

    2008 doi

  26. [34]

    Emaan Bilal Khan, Hira Eiraj Daud, Ayesha Rehman, Romessa Shah Jahan, Ab- dullah Zaka, and Suleman Shahid. 2023. T1D Buddy: A Hybrid Solution to Provide Type 1 Diabetic Support for Early Diagnosed Children. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children ...

    2023

  27. [35]

    Bryan Kim, Ye Chan Kim, Jin Joo Son, Da-Yea Song, Ill Jin Lee, Jae Hyun Han, Doori Kim, Hee Jeong Yoo, and Jee-In Kim. 2023. Game-Driven Practices for Social Skills: Exploring Usability for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on In...

    2023

  28. [36]

    Weiss, Liat Gafni-Lachter, Rachel Kizony, and Naomi Gefen

    Tal Krasovsky, Patrice L. Weiss, Liat Gafni-Lachter, Rachel Kizony, and Naomi Gefen. 2024. Hybrid approaches to allied health services for children and young people: a scoping review. 21, 1 (2024), 1–15. doi:10.1186/s12984-024-01401-1 Number: 1 Publisher: BioMed Central

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    Tetyana Kucher. 2021. Principles and Best Practices of Designing Digital Game- Based Learning Environments. 5, 2 (2021), 213–223. doi:10.46328/ijtes.190 Num- ber: 2

    2021 doi

  30. [38]

    Fedwa Laamarti, Mohamad Eid, and Abdulmotaleb El Saddik. 2014. An Overview of Serious Games. 2014, 1 (2014), 358152. doi:10.1155/2014/358152 _eprint: CSCW Companion ’25, October 18–22, 2025, Bergen, Norway Irene Zeng, Neda Barbazi, Ji Youn Shin, Gurumurthy Hiremath, & Carlye A...

    2014 doi

  31. [39]

    Susanne Lindberg. 2013. Participatory design workshops with children with cancer: lessons learned. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (New York, NY, USA, 2013-06-24) (IDC ’13). Asso- ciation for Computing Machinery, 332–335. ...

    2013

  32. [41]

    Brenna McNally, Mona Leigh Guha, Matthew Louis Mauriello, and Allison Druin

  33. [42]

    Nicolaou, Roy Carlton, Aisha Jaddoh, Yasir Syed, Justin James, Chra Abdoulqadir, and Fernando Loizides

    Kyriakos C. Nicolaou, Roy Carlton, Aisha Jaddoh, Yasir Syed, Justin James, Chra Abdoulqadir, and Fernando Loizides. 2023. Game Based Learning Rehabilitation for Children with Speech Disabilities: Presenting Two Bespoke Video Games. BCS Learning & Development, 44–48. doi:10.142...

    2023 doi

  34. [43]

    Sarah Nikkhah, Akash Uday Rode, Neha Kulkarni, Priyanjali Mittal, Emily Mueller, and Andrew Miller. 2022. Designing for Families as Adaptive Systems: Collaborative Emotional Support and Resilience in the Children’s Hospital. In Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on ...

    2022

  35. [44]

    Francisco Nunes, Nervo Verdezoto, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, Morten Kyng, Erik Grönvall, and Cristiano Storni. 2015. Self-Care Technologies in HCI: Trends, Tensions, and Opportunities. 22, 6 (2015), 33:1–33:45. doi:10.1145/2803173

    2015 doi

  36. [45]

    Zilong Pan and Min Liu. 2022. The effects of learning analytics hint system in supporting students problem-solving. In LAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference (New York, NY, USA, 2022-03-21) (LAK22). Association for Computing Machinery, 77–86. doi...

    2022

  37. [46]

    Konrad Peters, Ousama Ghessas, Helmut Hlavacs, and Anita Lawitschka. 2023. De- sign and Evaluation of a Serious Game for Young Haemato-Oncological Patients. In Serious Games: 9th Joint International Conference, JCSG 2023, Dublin, Ireland, October 26–27, 2023, Proceedings (Berl...

    2023 doi

  38. [47]

    Xiang Qi and Junnan Yu. 2025. Participatory Design in Human-Computer Interac- tion: Cases, Characteristics, and Lessons. InProceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2025-04-25) (CHI ’25). Association for Computing Machiner...

    2025

  39. [48]

    J. C. Read and P. Markopoulos. 2013. Child–computer interaction. 1, 1 (2013), 2–6. doi:10.1016/j.ijcci.2012.09.001

    2013 doi

  40. [49]

    Rodts, Ndidi I

    Megan E. Rodts, Ndidi I. Unaka, Christopher J. Statile, and Nicolas L. Madsen

  41. [50]

    Made Ary Sarasmita, Ya-Han Lee, Fan-Ying Chan, and Hsiang-Yin Chen. 2024. Digital Serious Games to Promote Behavior Change in Children With Chronic Diseases: Scoping Review and Development of a Self-Management Learning Framework. 26, 1 (2024), e49692. doi:10.2196/49692 Company...

    2024 doi

  42. [51]

    Al Saud and AlJohara Fahad. 2017. Educational Video Games Enrich Under- privileged Children’s Social Skills in Saudi Arabia. 4, 2 (2017), 32–47. https: //eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1236141 Publisher: European Scientific Institute ERIC Num- ber: EJ1236141

    2017

  43. [52]

    Buyuktur, Sanya Verma, Hyeryoung Kim, Sung Won Choi, Laura Sedig, and Sun Young Park

    Woosuk Seo, Ayse G. Buyuktur, Sanya Verma, Hyeryoung Kim, Sung Won Choi, Laura Sedig, and Sun Young Park. 2021. Learning from Healthcare Providers’ Strategies: Designing Technology to Support Effective Child Patient-Provider Communication. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Confer...

    2021

  44. [53]

    Eija Sevón, Mustola , Marleena, Siippainen , Anna, , and Janniina Vlasov. 2025. Participatory research methods with young children: a systematic literature review. 77, 3 (2025), 1000–1018. doi:10.1080/00131911.2023.2215465 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/...

    2025

  45. [54]

    Ji Youn Shin and Bree Holtz. 2020. Identifying opportunities and challenges: how children use technologies for managing diabetes. In Proceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference (New York, NY, USA, 2020-06-21) (IDC ’20) . Association for Computing Machinery, 4...

    2020

  46. [55]

    Ji Youn Shin and Bree E. Holtz. 2019. Towards Better Transitions for Children with Diabetes: User Experiences on a Mobile Health App. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (New York, NY, USA, 2019-06-12) (IDC ’19). Associati...

    2019

  47. [56]

    Anna Stålberg, Anette Sandberg, Maja Söderbäck, and Thomas Larsson. 2016. The child’s perspective as a guiding principle: Young children as co-designers in the design of an interactive application meant to facilitate participation in healthcare situations. 61 (2016), 149–158. ...

    2016 doi

  48. [57]

    Kamath, Pornchai Tirakitsoontorn, and Yunan Chen

    Zhaoyuan Su, Sunil P. Kamath, Pornchai Tirakitsoontorn, and Yunan Chen

  49. [58]

    Hiran Thabrew, Theresa Fleming, Sarah Hetrick, and Sally Merry. 2018. Co- design of eHealth Interventions With Children and Young People. 9 (2018). doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00481 Publisher: Frontiers

    2018

  50. [59]

    Kartika Gianina Tileng, Lenny Rosita, Hawwin Mardhiana, and Christian. 2024. Usability Testing on Student Mobile Application in University using Cognitive Walkthrough Method. In Proceedings of the 2023 8th International Conference on Information Systems Engineering (New York, ...

    2024

  51. [60]

    Canan Uluhan, , and Nurdan Akçay Didişen. 2024. Effects of the re- mission video game on fatigue and quality of life levels of adolescents di- agnosed with cancer: a randomized controlled trial. 29, 3 (2024), 603–

    2024

  52. [61]

    Gary Ushaw, Richard Davison, Janet Eyre, and Graham Morgan. 2015. Adopting Best Practices from the Games Industry in Development of Serious Games for Health. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Digital Health 2015 (New York, NY, USA, 2015-05-18)(DH ’15). Asso...

    2015

  53. [62]

    Valenza, Isabela Gasparini, and Marcelo da S

    Matheus V. Valenza, Isabela Gasparini, and Marcelo da S. Hounsell. 2019. Serious Game Design for Children: A Set of Guidelines and their Validation. 22, 3 (2019), 19–31. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26896707 Publisher: International Forum of Educational Technology & Society

    2019

  54. [63]

    Pa Chang Vang and Carlye Anne Lauff. 2024. Reflections on Data Collection during Toy Prototype Development in a Design Studio Course. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference (New York, NY, USA, 2024-06-17) (IDC ’24). Association for Com...

    2024

  55. [64]

    Aline Elias Cardoso Verhalen, Tiago Marino Silva, and Kamila Rios Da Hora Rodrigues. 2024. Once upon a time... you! A game to support health professionals in the treatment of children with chronic diseases, helping them to express their feelings. In Proceedings of the XXII Bra...

    2024

  56. [65]

    8 (2024), 182:1–182:35

    The Hidden Burden: Encountering and Managing (Unintended) Stigma in Children with Serious Illnesses. 8 (2024), 182:1–182:35. Issue CSCW1. doi:10. 1145/3641021

    2024

  57. [66]

    Greg Walsh, Alison Druin, Mona Leigh Guha, Elizabeth Foss, Evan Golub, Leshell Hatley, Elizabeth Bonsignore, and Sonia Franckel. 2010. Layered elab- oration: a new technique for co-design with children. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Syst...

    2010

  58. [67]

    Yongfu Wang, Jacklyn Cui, and Tiffany Y. Tang. 2024. Position Paper: An Emoji- Based Interactive App to Aid Emotion Expression for Autistic Children. In Com- panion of the 2024 on ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiq- uitous Computing (New York, NY, USA, 20...

    2024

  59. [68]

    Lisa Whitehead, Suzanne Robinson, Diana Arabiat, Mark Jenkins, and Evalotte Morelius. 2024. The Report of Access and Engagement With Digital Health Interventions Among Children and Young People: Systematic Review. 7, 1 (2024), e44199. doi:10.2196/44199 Company: JMIR Pediatrics...

    2024 doi

  60. [69]

    Zhiyong Xiong and Minshi Fu. 2024. A Serious Game for Children’s Creative Thinking Training Based on Experiential Gaming Model. In Proceedings of the 2024 International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence for Education (New York, NY, USA, 2024-11-18) (ISAIE ’24). Association ...

    2024

  61. [70]

    Yip, Kiley Sobel, Caroline Pitt, Kung Jin Lee, Sijin Chen, Kari Nasu, and Laura R

    Jason C. Yip, Kiley Sobel, Caroline Pitt, Kung Jin Lee, Sijin Chen, Kari Nasu, and Laura R. Pina. 2017. Examining Adult-Child Interactions in Intergenerational Participatory Design. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, ...

    2017

  62. [71]

    Qi-Liang Zhang, Jian-Feng Liu, Wen-Peng Xie, Hua Cao, and Qiang Chen. 2021. The Effect of WeChat on Parental Care Burden, Anxiety, and Depression in Children after CHD Surgery during COVID-19 Pandemic. 12 (2021), 768–773. doi:10.1055/s-0041-1733850 Publisher: Georg Thieme Verlag KG

    2021 doi

  63. [74]

    It’s All in the Game

    Lieke Vermeulen, Max V. Birk, Scott Bateman, Henk S. Schipper, Sanne L. Nijhof, and Yuan Lu. 2022. “It’s All in the Game” A board game to facilitate disease- related conversations between children with a chronic disease and their peers. In Extended Abstracts of the 2022 Annual...

    2022

  64. [614]

    doi:10.1080/13548506.2023.2289471 Publisher: Taylor & Francis _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2023.2289471

    2023

  65. [749]

    doi:10.1145/2786567.2793696

  66. [2013]

    8, 1 (2013), 78–85

    Parents of Children with Congenital Heart Disease Prefer More Infor- mation than Cardiologists Provide. 8, 1 (2013), 78–85. doi:10.1111/j.1747- 0803.2012.00706.x _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1747- 0803.2012.00706.x

    2013 arXiv

  67. [2015]

    In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human- Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct (New York, NY, USA, 2015-08-24) (MobileHCI ’15)

    Using Serious Games to Improve Therapeutic Goals in Children with Special Needs. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human- Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct (New York, NY, USA, 2015-08-24) (MobileHCI ’15). Association for Computi...

    2015

  68. [2016]

    InProceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2016-05-07) (CHI ’16)

    Children’s Perspectives on Ethical Issues Surrounding Their Past Involve- ment on a Participatory Design Team. InProceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2016-05-07) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, 3595–36...

    2016

  69. [2017]

    In Pro- ceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI International Workshop on Multimodal Interaction for Education (New York, NY, USA, 2017-11-13) (MIE 2017)

    A multimodal serious-game to teach fractions in primary school. In Pro- ceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI International Workshop on Multimodal Interaction for Education (New York, NY, USA, 2017-11-13) (MIE 2017). Association for Com- puting Machinery, 67–70. doi:10.1145/3139513.3139524

    2017

  70. [2020]

    30, 10 (2020), 1439–1444

    Health literacy and caregiver understanding in the CHD population. 30, 10 (2020), 1439–1444. doi:10.1017/S1047951120002243

    2020 doi

  71. [2024]

    83, 4 (2024), 12017–12033

    A serious game-based platform for measuring treatment adherence. 83, 4 (2024), 12017–12033. doi:10.1007/s11042-023-15988-5 Company: Springer Distributor: Springer Institution: Springer Label: Springer Number: 4 Publisher: Springer US

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.