Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 40 references

Analysis of the Metabolic Profile and Biological Activity of Hawthorn Species Twigs: Crataegus azarolus and Crataegus monogyna

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports that twigs of two hawthorn species are rich in phenolic antioxidants but poor antibacterial agents, and that the two species have distinct flavonoid profiles.

desk verdict A small new hawthorn twig dataset with a potentially interesting kaempferol chemotaxonomy signal, but the HPLC identification is unvalidated and the antimicrobial conclusions contradict the abstract. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.03670 v1 pith:OHC7PNHD submitted 2025-09-03 q-bio.OT

Hiwa Sheikh Ahmed Qalatobzany , Kadhm Abdullah Muhammad , Djshwar Dhahir Lateef , Kamaran Salh Rasul , Abdulrahman Smail Ibrahim , Mariana Casari Parreira , Weria Weisany This is my paper · ORCID
classification q-bio.OT
keywords CrataegusazarolusmonogynahawthorntwigsphenoliccompoundsflavonoidsantioxidantactivityantimicrobialHPLCmetabolicprofile
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that the twigs of Crataegus azarolus and Crataegus monogyna, parts of the hawthorn tree usually passed over in favor of fruit, flowers, and leaves, are a meaningful source of bioactive compounds. It reports that C. monogyna twigs carry higher total phenolics, flavonoids, and tannins and scavenge DPPH and ABTS radicals more strongly, while C. azarolus twigs show a more even chemical profile that includes kaempferol, which is absent from C. monogyna. Against three bacteria, both twig extracts produce only small inhibition zones, so the paper concludes the antimicrobial activity is low. If the profile holds up, twigs could be used as a natural antioxidant source and the kaempferol difference could help tell the two species apart.

What carries the argument

The species comparison is carried by HPLC-UV with a C18 column and a methanol/water/acetic acid mobile phase, detecting at 360 nm; compound identity is assigned by retention time and relative contribution by peak area percentage. Around this HPLC profile, the paper lays the total phenolic (Folin-Ciocalteu), total flavonoid (AlCl3), and total tannin (vanillin) colorimetric assays, the DPPH and ABTS radical-scavenging assays, and an agar well-diffusion test for antibacterial inhibition zones. The HPLC peak-area profile is what carries the kaempferol-present/absent distinction and the claim that quercetin dominates C. monogyna.

What would settle it

Re-analyze the same twig extracts with quantitative HPLC or LC-MS using authentic standards and calibration curves. If the species' mass-based concentrations do not reproduce the reported 14.4% kaempferol / 72% quercetin pattern—say, if C. monogyna also contains kaempferol or C. azarolus is actually quercetin-dominant on a mass basis—then the chemotaxonomic and species-difference claims fail. Likewise, measuring minimum inhibitory concentrations would show whether the 5-7 mm zones reflect genuine antibacterial effect.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the paper's own terms, the central finding is that hawthorn twigs, not just the better-studied fruit and leaves, contain substantial phenolic metabolites and show measurable antioxidant activity, but only weak antimicrobial activity. HPLC analysis at 360 nm is used to report that C. monogyna has a quercetin-dominant profile—about 72 percent of detected peak area—with no detectable kaempferol, while C. azarolus has a more balanced distribution of kaempferol, catechin, quercetin, and gallic acid. The authors interpret the unique kaempferol peak in C. azarolus as a possible distinguishing chemical marker, and the higher total phenolic, flavonoid, and tannin content of C. monogyna as consiste

Load-bearing premise

The main claim rests on assuming that a compound's peak size in the chromatography readout reflects how much of it is present, with no calibration against known amounts of the pure compounds.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • C. monogyna twigs, with higher phenolic, flavonoid, and tannin contents, are the stronger radical scavenger of the two species in both DPPH and ABTS assays.
  • If the 72 percent quercetin peak-area share reflects the actual extract composition, C. monogyna twig extracts offer a relatively concentrated flavonoid source.
  • Kaempferol's absence from C. monogyna and presence in C. azarolus gives a candidate chemical marker for distinguishing the two species.
  • The small inhibition zones imply that crude twig extracts are unlikely to replace conventional antibiotics without further purification or concentration.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the kaempferol signal is confirmed with authenticated standards, the marker could be tested across other Crataegus populations as a low-cost chemotaxonomic screen.
  • Since the 'amounts' in the HPLC table are peak-area percentages, not calibrated concentrations, comparing these values across species should be treated as provisional until quantitative standards are run.
  • The reported 5-7 mm inhibition zones sit near the detection threshold of agar well diffusion; minimum inhibitory concentration assays would clarify whether the antimicrobial effect is real or an artifact of the method.
  • Twigs are often pruning waste; if the antioxidant activity scales with biomass, they could become a byproduct source for functional food or cosmetic ingredients.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports a phytochemical and bioactivity screen of twig extracts from C. azarolus and C. monogyna collected in northern Iraq. The authors measured total phenolic, flavonoid, and tannin contents, an HPLC polyphenol profile, DPPH/ABTS radical scavenging, and agar-well inhibition against B. subtilis, S. aureus, and MRSA. The central claims are that C. monogyna has higher phenolic content and antioxidant activity, that C. azarolus uniquely contains kaempferol while C. monogyna is dominated by quercetin (about 72% of HPLC peak area), and that both extracts have weak antimicrobial activity.

Significance. If substantiated, the data would support twig biomass as a phenolic source and suggest a possible chemotaxonomic marker distinguishing the two Crataegus species. The manuscript's strengths are its direct measurement approach, the use of widely accepted colorimetric endpoints, and the transparent tabulation of raw chromatographic areas. However, the key chemical-differentiation claim is not yet backed by validated HPLC quantification, and the bioactivity comparisons lack reported variance and assay controls. The potential is real, but the current evidentiary basis is incomplete.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.4, Table 2, Abstract] The HPLC-based identification and quantification are unvalidated. No authentic standards, calibration curves, response factors, sample injection concentrations, or limits of detection/quantification are reported. The abstract's 'highest amount of kaempferol (14.40%)' is a normalized UV area percentage at 360 nm, not a concentration or mass fraction; equal area percentages do not imply equal masses because molar absorptivities differ among analytes. The reported elution order (gallic acid at 8.13 min after quercetin; kaempferol at 5.28 min before catechin at 6.51 min) is atypical for reversed-phase C18 and raises a concrete risk that peaks are misassigned. Without co-injection of authentic standards under identical conditions (or LC-MS confirmation) and a calibration curve, the claims that kaempferol is unique to C. azarolus and that quercetin constitutes 72% of C. monogyna's profile are
  2. [Sections 2.6, 3.3, Tables 1 and 3] Statistical and assay reporting is incomplete. Tables 1 and 3 report only means with superscript letters; no standard deviations, standard errors, or replicate counts are given, despite the captions stating 'average of triplicate measurements.' Without variance information it is impossible to judge whether differences such as 19.50 vs 22.23 mg GAE/g DW or 81.86% vs 86.13% DPPH are meaningful. The antimicrobial data report inhibition zones of 5.2-6.6 mm with no well diameter, no solvent control for 2.5% DMSO, no positive antibiotic control, and an unusual measurement convention ('from the margin of the inhibition zone to the edge of the wells'). These omissions undermine the quantitative basis for the 'low antimicrobial activity' conclusion and should be remedied with full descriptive statistics and appropriate controls.
  3. [Section 2.1 and 2.2] Biological replication is absent. The study uses one composite batch of 120 twigs per species collected on a single date; all reported values appear to be technical replicates of a single extract. Species-level comparisons are therefore confounded with batch/plant variation. At minimum, the authors should state that the data represent one pooled sample and should soften the species-level claims accordingly, or provide independent collections/biological replicates to support generalization.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] Several typographical and nomenclature errors: 'dizarophenyl' should be 'diphenyl' in DPPH, 'Kampferol' for kaempferol in Figure 2, 'McFarl and' for McFarland, 'superstation efficiencies' likely means chromatographic resolution, and 'MaU.s' should be 'mAU·s'. Units are inconsistent: 'mg GA/g DW,' 'mg QU/g DW,' and 'mg CA/g DW' should be expressed as GAE, QE, and CE equivalents as stated in Section 2.4.
  2. [Table 3 caption and body] The caption refers to 'four twig extracts' but only two species are compared. The C. monogyna MRSA value (5.45) lacks a superscript letter, and the table mixes percentages and millimeters without explicit column units in the header.
  3. [Section 5, Conclusions] The conclusions claim scavenging of 'hydroxyl, superoxide anion, and DPPH compounds,' but only DPPH and ABTS assays were performed. This overstates the scope of the antioxidant measurements.
  4. [Section 2.4] The HPLC mobile phase is given as methanol:D.W:acetic acid (85:13:2); this composition sums to 100% but no pH or gradient details are given. It would be helpful to state whether the system is isocratic and to specify the injection volume and detection wavelength rationale.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the study reports direct measurements; self-citations are methodological only.

full rationale

This paper is an empirical phytochemical and bioactivity study, not a derivation or modeling paper. The claims—higher TPC/TFC/TTC in C. monogyna, higher DPPH/ABTS activity in C. monogyna, and species differences in HPLC peak areas—are presented as direct measurements of the collected samples. There is no equation in which an output is defined as an input, no parameter fitted to a subset of data and then used to predict the same data, and no theoretical result imported from the authors' prior work that forces the conclusion. The only self-citations are methodological: Section 2.4 cites Tahir et al. [23] and Lateef et al. [24] for the Folin-Ciocalteu, AlCl3, and vanillin protocols, and Section 2.5 cites Lateef et al. [24], Tahir et al. [25], and Tahir et al. [26] for DPPH, ABTS, and agar well diffusion procedures. These citations provide assay protocols only; they do not supply the hawthorn measurements or predetermine the species ranking. The HPLC identification and quantification concerns raised by the skeptic (no calibration curves, area % used as 'amount', atypical retention times) are methodological validity issues, not circularity: the paper does not define the conclusion into existence, it simply overstates the quantitative meaning of peak areas. Thus, under the hard rules, there is no quotable step where the derivation reduces to its own inputs. Score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard assay assumptions rather than mathematical derivation. The listed free parameters are hand-chosen assay conditions that affect all measurements. The axioms are domain assumptions about HPLC quantification and in-vitro assay interpretation that the paper does not justify with calibration data or controls.

free parameters (4)
  • Extract concentration for antibacterial assay = 0.05 mg/uL (100 mg extract in 2 mL 2.5% DMSO)
    Chosen by hand, not derived. The resulting 5.2 to 6.6 mm inhibition zones are conditional on this concentration.
  • DPPH working concentration = 0.0038 g per 100 mL 95% methanol
    Hand-selected standard recipe, with no titration or optimization shown. Affects the DPPH scavenging percentages.
  • ABTS working dilution = 1:50 dilution of an unspecified ABTS stock
    The stock preparation (oxidant, incubation time, absorbance adjustment) is not given, so the effective radical concentration is under-specified.
  • Extraction solvent ratio = 45% acetone, 45% methanol, 10% dH2O
    Chosen by hand; different solvents would change the extracted metabolite profile and therefore all downstream measurements.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption HPLC peak-area percentage at 360 nm is proportional to the amount of each compound
    The paper reports 'amounts' as area percentages (Section 3.2, Table 2) without calibration curves or response factors.
  • domain assumption Compound identity is established by retention time matching against commercial standards
    Section 2.4 describes HPLC with UV detection; no co-elution, spectral matching, or mass confirmation is reported.
  • domain assumption DPPH and ABTS discoloration at a single extract concentration measures antioxidant capacity
    Section 2.5.1 measures one concentration per assay; no dose-response curve or IC50 is reported.
  • domain assumption Agar well diffusion zones of 5.2 to 6.6 mm indicate antimicrobial activity
    Section 2.5.2 and Table 3 use absolute zone diameters without clinical breakpoints, positive controls, or solvent controls.
  • domain assumption Taxonomic identification by one taxonomist is correct
    Section 2.1 states identification was performed by a taxonomist and voucher specimens deposited, but no accession number is given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Analysis of the Metabolic Profile and Biological Activity of Hawthorn Species Twigs: Crataegus azarolus and Crataegus monogyna." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OHC7PNHD

@misc{pith2026250903670,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Analysis of the Metabolic Profile and Biological Activity of Hawthorn Species Twigs: Crataegus azarolus and Crataegus monogyna},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OHC7PNHD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.03670}
}
read the original abstract

All parts of the hawthorn tree (Crataegus spp.), including fruits, flowers, and leaves, have been used as a source of bioactive compounds. Thus, in this investigation, the twigs of two species of hawthorn plant of Crataegus azarolus (C. azarolus) and Crataegus monogyna (C. monogyna) were evaluated for bioactive compositions and biological activity (antioxidant and antimicrobial activities). To evaluate bioactive compositions, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was applied, and for biological activity, biochemical assays were performed. C. monogyna revealed a higher amount of total phenolic, total flavonoid, and total tannin contents compared to C. azarolus. The HPLC results indicated the highest amount of kaempferol (14.40%), catechin (17.70%), and gallic acid (25%) in twigs of C. azarolus, while the maximum quercetin (72%) compound was present in C. monogyna. C. monogyna exhibited higher antioxidant activity by 1,1 dizarophenyl 2 picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) (86.13%) and 2,2 azino bis (3 ethylbenzothiazoline 6 sulfonic acid (ABTS) (92.93%) compared to C. azarolus for antioxidant activity DPPH (81.86%) and ABTS (87.47%) assay. In the case of antimicrobial activity, the twigs of both species (especially C. azarolus) have a capacity against Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The results of this study revealed that the twigs of both species contained a high amount of phenolic metabolites and antioxidant activity, while they showed low antimicrobial activity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    An Integrated Approach to Map the Impact of Climate Change on the Distributions of Crataegus azarolus and Crataegus monogyna in Kurdistan Region, Iraq,

    K. O. Radha and N. R. Khwarahm, “An Integrated Approach to Map the Impact of Climate Change on the Distributions of Crataegus azarolus and Crataegus monogyna in Kurdistan Region, Iraq,” Sustainability , vol. 14, no. 21, p. 4621, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su142114621

    work page doi:10.3390/su142114621 2022

  2. [2]

    Food Applications and Potential Health Benefits of Hawthorn,

    J. Zhang, X. Chai, F. Zhao, G. Hou, and Q. Meng, “Food Applications and Potential Health Benefits of Hawthorn,” Foods, vol. 11, no. 18, p. 2861, 2022, doi: 10.3390/foods11182861

    work page doi:10.3390/foods11182861 2022

  3. [3]

    Hawthorn (Crataegus spp.): An Updated Overview on Its Beneficial Properties,

    A. Nazhand et al., “Hawthorn (Crataegus spp.): An Updated Overview on Its Beneficial Properties,” Forests, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 564, 2020, doi: 10.3390/f11050564. http://doi.org/10.24017/science.2025.1.8 124

    work page doi:10.3390/f11050564 2020

  4. [4]

    Regulation of Phytochemical Properties of Hawthorn: A Crataegus Species,

    J. Rafeeq et al., “Regulation of Phytochemical Properties of Hawthorn: A Crataegus Species,” in Genetic Manipulation of Secondary Metabolites in Medicinal Plant, N. Singh Ravi and Kumar, Ed., Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2023, pp. 179–203. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-4939-7_8

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-99-4939-7_8 2023

  5. [5]

    The effect of hawthorn ( Crataegus spp.) on blood pressure: A systematic review,

    A. Cloud, D. Vilcins, and B. McEwen, “The effect of hawthorn ( Crataegus spp.) on blood pressure: A systematic review,” Advances in integrative medicine, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 167–175, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aimed.2019.09.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aimed.2019.09.002 2020

  6. [6]

    Potential Roles and Key Mechanisms of Hawthorn Extract against Various Liver Diseases,

    E. Kim, E. Jang, and J. H. Lee, “Potential Roles and Key Mechanisms of Hawthorn Extract against Various Liver Diseases,” Nutrients, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 867, 2022, doi: 10.3390/nu14040867

    work page doi:10.3390/nu14040867 2022

  7. [7]

    Traditional uses, phytochemistry, pharmacology, and safety concerns of hawthorn ( Crataegus genus): A comprehensive review ,

    M. Cui et al., “Traditional uses, phytochemistry, pharmacology, and safety concerns of hawthorn ( Crataegus genus): A comprehensive review ,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology , vol. 319, p. 117229, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2023.117229

    work page arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Chemical composition, biological activities, and quality stand- ards of hawthorn leaves used in traditional Chinese medicine: a comprehensive review,

    W. Guo, T. Shao, Y. Peng, H. Wang, Z. S. Chen, and H. Su, “Chemical composition, biological activities, and quality stand- ards of hawthorn leaves used in traditional Chinese medicine: a comprehensive review,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 14, p. 1275244, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1275244

    work page arXiv 2023

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    The hawthorn (Crataegus pinnatifida Bge.) fruit as a new dietary source of bioactive ingredients with multiple beneficial functions,

    J. X. Ma et al., “The hawthorn (Crataegus pinnatifida Bge.) fruit as a new dietary source of bioactive ingredients with multiple beneficial functions,” Food Frontiers, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1534–1558, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/fft2.413

    2024 doi

  2. [10]

    Oxidative Stress in Ageing and Chronic Degenerative Pathologies: Molecular Mechanisms Involved in Counteracting Oxidative Stress and Chronic Inflammation,

    T. S. Leyane, S. W. Jere, and N. N. Houreld, “Oxidative Stress in Ageing and Chronic Degenerative Pathologies: Molecular Mechanisms Involved in Counteracting Oxidative Stress and Chronic Inflammation,” International Journal of Molecular Sci- ences, vol. 23, no. 13, p. 7273, 20...

    2022 doi

  3. [11]

    Childhood Cardiovascular Health, Obesity, and Some Related Disorders: Insights into Chronic Inflammation and Oxidative Stress,

    T. Hertiš Petek and N. Marčun Varda, “Childhood Cardiovascular Health, Obesity, and Some Related Disorders: Insights into Chronic Inflammation and Oxidative Stress,” International Journal of M olecular Sciences, vol. 25, no. 17, p. 9706. 2024, doi: 10.3390/ijms25179706

    2024 doi

  4. [12]

    Role of Silent Information Regulator 1 (SIRT1) in Regulating Oxidative Stress and Inflammation,

    V. Singh and S. Ubaid, “Role of Silent Information Regulator 1 (SIRT1) in Regulating Oxidative Stress and Inflammation,” Inflammation, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1589–1598, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10753-020-01242-9

    2020 doi

  5. [13]

    N-acetylcysteine Ameliorates Vancomycin-induced Nephrotoxicity by Inhibiting Oxidative Stress and Apop- tosis in the in vivo and in vitro Models,

    P. Yu et al., “N-acetylcysteine Ameliorates Vancomycin-induced Nephrotoxicity by Inhibiting Oxidative Stress and Apop- tosis in the in vivo and in vitro Models,” International Journal of Medical Sciences , vol. 19, no. 4, p p. 740- 752, 2022. doi: 10.7150/ijms.69807

    2022 doi

  6. [14]

    Cytoprotective remedies for ameliorating nephrotoxicity induced by renal oxi- dative stress,

    R. Ranasinghe, M. Mathai, and A. Zulli, “Cytoprotective remedies for ameliorating nephrotoxicity induced by renal oxi- dative stress,” Life Science, vol. 318, p. 121466, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2023.121466

    2023

  7. [15]

    Agro-industrial by-products: Valuable sources of bioactive compounds,

    L. M. Reguengo, M. K. Salgaço, K. Sivieri, and M. R. Maróstica Júnior, “Agro-industrial by-products: Valuable sources of bioactive compounds,” Food Research International, vol. 152, p. 110871, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.food- res.2021.110871

    2022

  8. [16]

    Functional dairy products as a source of bioactive peptides and probiotics: current trends and future prospectives,

    M. A. Ali et al., “Functional dairy products as a source of bioactive peptides and probiotics: current trends and future prospectives,” Journal of Food Science and Technology, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 1263–1279, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s13197-021-05091-8

    2022 doi

  9. [17]

    A Comprehensive Review of Bioactive Compounds from Lactic Acid Bacteria: Potential Functions as Functional Food in Dietetics and the Food Industry,

    B. N. Abdul Hakim, N. J. Xuan, and S. N. H. Oslan, “A Comprehensive Review of Bioactive Compounds from Lactic Acid Bacteria: Potential Functions as Functional Food in Dietetics and the Food Industry,” Foods , vol. 12, no. 15, p. 2850, 2023, doi: 10.3390/foods12152850

    2023 doi

  10. [18]

    Concept, mechanism, and applications of phenolic antioxidants in foods,

    A. Zeb, “Concept, mechanism, and applications of phenolic antioxidants in foods,” Journal of Food Biochemistry, vol. 44, no. 9, p. e13394, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfbc.13394

    2020 doi

  11. [19]

    Plants and Phytochemicals for the Treatment of Atherosclerosis,

    A. Enayati, B. M. J. Hatemi and T. Pullaiah, “Plants and Phytochemicals for the Treatment of Atherosclerosis,” in Cardio- protective Plants, S. Pullaiah T. and Ojha, Ed., Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2024, pp. 53–85. doi: 10.1007/978-981- 97-4627-9_3

    2024 doi

  12. [20]

    Cassia sieberiana DC. leaves modulate LPS -induced inflammatory response in THP- 1 cells and inhibit eicosanoid-metabolizing enzymes,

    T. Macedo et al., “ Cassia sieberiana DC. leaves modulate LPS -induced inflammatory response in THP- 1 cells and inhibit eicosanoid-metabolizing enzymes,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology , vol. 269, p. 113746, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2020.113746

    2021

  13. [21]

    Natural antioxidants from some fruits, seeds, foods, natural products, and associated health bene- fits: An update,

    M. M. Rahaman et al., “Natural antioxidants from some fruits, seeds, foods, natural products, and associated health bene- fits: An update,” Food Science & Nutrition, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1657–1670, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.3217

    2023 doi

  14. [22]

    Plant Nutrition for Human Health: A Pictorial Review on Plant Bioactive Compounds for Sustainable Agriculture,

    H. El-Ramady et al., “Plant Nutrition for Human Health: A Pictorial Review on Plant Bioactive Compounds for Sustainable Agriculture,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 14, p. 8329, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14148329

    2022 doi

  15. [23]

    N. A. Tahir, J. O. Ahmed, H. A. Azeez, W. R. M. Palani, and D. A. Omer, “Phytochemical, antibacterial, antioxidant and phytotoxicity screening of the extracts collected from the fruit and root of wild Mt. Atlas mastic tree (Pistacia atlantica subsp. kurdica).,” Applied Ecology...

    2019 doi

  16. [24]

    Screening of Iraqi barley accessions under PEG-induced drought conditions,

    D. Lateef, K. Mustafa, and N. Tahir, “Screening of Iraqi barley accessions under PEG-induced drought conditions,” All Life, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 308–332, 2021, doi: 10.1080/26895293.2021.1917456

    2021

  17. [25]

    Effects of Oak Leaf Extract, Biofertilizer, and Soil Containing Oak Leaf Powder on Tomato Growth and Biochemical Characteristics under Water Stress Conditions,

    N. A. Tahir, K. S. Rasul, D. D. Lateef, and F. M. W. Grundler, “Effects of Oak Leaf Extract, Biofertilizer, and Soil Containing Oak Leaf Powder on Tomato Growth and Biochemical Characteristics under Water Stress Conditions,” Agriculture, vol. 12, no. 12, p. 2082, 2022, doi: 10...

    doi

  18. [26]

    Antibacterial activity and allelopathic effects of extracts from leaf, stem and bark of Mt. Atlas mastic tree (Pistacia atlantica subsp. kurdica) on crops and weeds,

    N. A. Tahir, H. A. Azeez, H. H. Amin, J. Rashids, and D. Omer, “Antibacterial activity and allelopathic effects of extracts from leaf, stem and bark of Mt. Atlas mastic tree (Pistacia atlantica subsp. kurdica) on crops and weeds,” Allelopathy Journal, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 121–1...

    2019 doi

  19. [27]

    Antibacterial plant compounds, extracts and essential oils: An updated review on their effects and putative mechanisms of action,

    F. J. Álvarez -Martínez, E. Barrajón -Catalán, M. Herranz- López, and V. Micol, “Antibacterial plant compounds, extracts and essential oils: An updated review on their effects and putative mechanisms of action,” Phytomedicine, vol. 90, p. 153626, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.20...

    2021

  20. [28]

    From plants to antimicrobials: Natural prod- ucts against bacterial membranes,

    F. Nourbakhsh, M. Lotfalizadeh, M. Badpeyma, A. Shakeri, and V. Soheili, “From plants to antimicrobials: Natural prod- ucts against bacterial membranes,” Phytotherapy Research , vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 33 –52, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.7275. http://doi.org/10.24017/sc...

    2022 doi

  21. [29]

    A review of the current evidence of fruit phenolic compounds as potential antimicrobials against pathogenic bacteria,

    M. C. Lima, C. Paiva de Sousa, C. Fernandez -Prada, J. Harel, J. D. Dubreuil, and E. L. de Souza, “A review of the current evidence of fruit phenolic compounds as potential antimicrobials against pathogenic bacteria,” Microbial Pathogenesis , vol. 130, pp. 259–270, 2019, doi: ...

    2019 doi

  22. [30]

    Current Strategies for Combating Biofilm- Forming Pathogens in Clinical Healthcare-Associated Infections,

    R. Biswas, B. Jangra, G. Ashok, V. Ravichandiran, and U. Mohan, “Current Strategies for Combating Biofilm- Forming Pathogens in Clinical Healthcare-Associated Infections,” Indian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 781–796, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s12088-024-01221-w

    2024 doi

  23. [31]

    Effects of Lipid- Based Encapsulation on the Bioaccessibility and Bioavailability of Phenolic Compounds,

    G. Ozkan, T. Kostka, T. Esatbeyoglu, and E. Capanoglu, “Effects of Lipid- Based Encapsulation on the Bioaccessibility and Bioavailability of Phenolic Compounds,” Molecules, vol. 25, no. 23, p. 5545, 2020, doi: 10.3390/molecules25235545

    2020 doi

  24. [32]

    Atomistic simulation on flavonoids derivatives as potential inhibitors of bacterial gyrase of Staphylococcus aureus,

    B. Ramachandran, V. Srinivasadesikan, T. M. Chou, J. Jeyakanthan, and S. L. Lee, “Atomistic simulation on flavonoids derivatives as potential inhibitors of bacterial gyrase of Staphylococcus aureus,” Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynam- ics, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 4314–4...

    2022 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Future Antimicrobials: Natural and Functionalized Phenolics,

    A. Lobiuc et al., “Future Antimicrobials: Natural and Functionalized Phenolics,” Molecules, vol. 28, no. 3, p.1114, 2023, doi: 10.3390/molecules28031114

    2023 doi

  26. [34]

    Simultaneously Determined Antioxidant and Pro-Oxidant Activity of Randomly Selected Plant Secondary Metabolites and Plant Extracts,

    T. Maliar et al., “Simultaneously Determined Antioxidant and Pro-Oxidant Activity of Randomly Selected Plant Secondary Metabolites and Plant Extracts,” Molecules, vol. 28, no. 19, p. 890, 2023, doi: 10.3390/molecules28196890

    2023 doi

  27. [35]

    Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) -Mediated Antibacterial Oxidative Therapies: Available Methods to Generate ROS and a Novel Option Proposal,

    S. Alfei, G. C. Schito, A. M. Schito, and G. Zuccari, “Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) -Mediated Antibacterial Oxidative Therapies: Available Methods to Generate ROS and a Novel Option Proposal,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences , vol. 25, no. 13, p. 7182, 2024, doi: ...

    2024 doi

  28. [36]

    Chapter 5 - Progressive approach of phenolic acids toward the advancement of antimicrobial drugs,

    J. O. Aribisala, C. E. Aruwa, and S. Sabiu, “Chapter 5 - Progressive approach of phenolic acids toward the advancement of antimicrobial drugs,” in Advancement of Phenolic Acids in Drug Discovery, N. Kumar, N. Goel, and J. S. Gandara, Eds., Academic Press, 2024, pp. 177–210. do...

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    Tannins as an alternative to antibiotics,

    A. K. Farha et al., “Tannins as an alternative to antibiotics,” Food Bioscience , vol. 38, p. 100751, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2020.100751

    2020

  30. [38]

    Screening of Natural Product Derivatives Identifies Two Structurally Related Flavonoids as Potent Quorum Sensing Inhibitors against Gram- Negative Bacteria,

    S. Manner and A. Fallarero, “Screening of Natural Product Derivatives Identifies Two Structurally Related Flavonoids as Potent Quorum Sensing Inhibitors against Gram- Negative Bacteria,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences , vol. 19, no. 5, p. 1346, 2018, doi: 10.3390/...

    2018 doi

  31. [39]

    N- acyl-homoserine lactone mediated virulence factor(s) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa inhibited by flavonoids and isoflavonoids,

    R. Pachaiappan et al., “N- acyl-homoserine lactone mediated virulence factor(s) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa inhibited by flavonoids and isoflavonoids,” Process Biochemistry , vol. 116, pp. 84 –93, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2022.02.024

    2022 doi

  32. [40]

    Molecular Mechanisms and Applications of N -Acyl Homoserine Lactone-Mediated Quorum Sensing in Bacteria,

    L. Kumar et al., “Molecular Mechanisms and Applications of N -Acyl Homoserine Lactone-Mediated Quorum Sensing in Bacteria,” Molecules, vol. 27, no. 21, p. 7584, 2022, doi: 10.3390/molecules27217584

    2022 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.