Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 109 references

New Interpretation for the Orientation of the LMC's Gaseous Arms B and E using ULLYSES

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read By using stars inside the LMC as backlights, this paper argues that the gaseous arms B and E lie at least partly in front of the galaxy's disk and extend about one degree closer to the 30 Doradus starburst.

desk verdict First UV down-the-barrel constraints on where LMC arms B/E sit along the line of sight, but the disk/offset boundary is soft enough that the arm identification and 1-degree extension need close referee scrutiny. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.03739 v1 pith:6Y26ESEM submitted 2025-09-03 astro-ph.GA

April Horton , Suraj Poudel , Kathleen A. Barger , Scott Lucchini , David L. Nidever , Erica Chwalik , Frances H. Cashman , Andrew J. Fox
show 15 more authors
Nicolas Lehner Dhanesh Krishnarao Naomi McClure-Griffiths Elena D'Onghia Jason Tumlinson Jo Vazquez Lauren Sdun Stone Gebhart Katherine Anthony Bryce Cole Jacco Th. van Loon John M. Dickey Callum Lynn Hiep Nguyen Min-Young Lee
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords LargeMagellanicCloud30DoradusHIarmsBandEUVabsorptionspectroscopyULLYSESdown-the-barreltechniqueStreamram-pressurestripping
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to settle where two long filaments of hydrogen gas around the Large Magellanic Cloud actually sit in three dimensions. Because the LMC is almost face-on, its own stars can be used as backlights: any gas that absorbs their ultraviolet light must lie between the star and the observer, on the near side of the galaxy. Using eight such stars near the 30 Doradus starburst, the authors detect neutral, low-ionization, and moderately-ionized gas at velocities just beyond the disk's edge, and show it moves together with the radio H I features known as arms B and E. They conclude that both arms are at least partly in front of the LMC and extend about one degree farther toward 30 Doradus than earlier maps showed. If correct, the finding recasts the origin debate: the arms could be outflowing debris pushed back by the Milky Way's ram pressure, or inflowing material feeding the starburst.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing setup is the down-the-barrel trick: with the LMC nearly face-on, stars inside its disk act as background lamps, so absorption at a given velocity proves the gas lies between star and observer, on the near side. Gas is classified as disk or offset by Gaussian decomposition of GASS/GASKAP 21-cm H I emission, whose hand-tuned boundaries (Table 2) define which UV absorbers count as extra-disk. Voigt-profile fitting (VoigtFit) and the apparent-optical-depth method supply velocities, widths, and column densities, while rotated position-velocity cuts trace how far the arms extend toward 30 Doradus. A GIZMO hydrodynamic simulation with a warm LMC corona tests whether nearside outflo

What would settle it

Reproduce the GASKAP H I cube with a fully warped, rotating-disk model: if it fits the 'offset' emission with no residual filament, the hand-drawn disk/offset boundaries are artifacts and the nearside-arm claim collapses. Independently, 21-cm absorption toward radio continuum sources at the claimed arm positions tests the foreground geometry directly: cold gas on the near side must absorb at arm velocities, while warm or far-side gas will not.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's claim is that the redshifted gas absorbing the light of eight stars embedded in the LMC's disk is the same material as the H I arms B and E, and that this gas sits in front of the galaxy. Because the background lamps are inside the disk, any detected absorber necessarily lies on the near side. Neutral (C I, S I), low-ionization (Fe II, Si II, P II, Ni II), and moderately-ionized (S II, Al III) gas share the arms' velocity range, and Gaussian decomposition of the GASKAP cube, with rotated position-velocity cuts, places both arms about 1.0 degree closer to 30 Doradus, converging near (l, b) = (280.5, -31.2). The paper leaves the arms' origin open: outflow swept by tides and ram pre

Load-bearing premise

The arm identification depends on where the authors draw the velocity line between ordinary LMC disk gas and the 'offset' gas: the boundaries in their Table 2 were set by Gaussian fits plus by-eye adjustments, and if disk gas spills into the offset window (or arm gas hides inside the disk window), the nearside-arm absorbers could actually be ordinary disk gas.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The orientation question is partly settled for these sightlines: gas absorbing starlight from inside the disk must be in front of the embedded stars, so at least parts of arms B and E lie on the LMC's near side, consistent with the earlier velocity-gradient result of Dickey et al. (1994).
  • Arms B and E connect to the H I overdensity around 30 Doradus roughly 1.0 degree farther in Galactic longitude than the LAB-based maps predicted, making the starburst the structural hub of both filaments.
  • The Al III column-density gradient (Kendall tau = -0.68, p = 0.033) shows moderately ionized gas is concentrated within about 0.25 degrees of 30 Doradus, tying the arms' ionization state to the starburst's radiation field.
  • The electron-density lower limit (n_e >~ 0.1 cm^-3) places the nearside gas in a denser regime than the body of the Magellanic Stream, as expected for a starburst-adjacent environment.
  • Both the outflow and inflow interpretations survive the data; the corona-shielded simulation produces both redshifted and blueshifted nearside winds, which is why the observations alone cannot choose between the two scenarios.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper cannot measure abundances because its low-ionization lines are saturated, so the inflow/outflow debate stays open. My extension: the decisive next observation is a metallicity measurement of the nearside arm gas — SMC-like abundances would point to tidal stripping and inflow, while LMC-like abundances would favor a galactic-fountain or outflow origin.
  • The suggested convergence of the two arms near (l, b) = (280.5, -31.2) is, I would argue, a natural site for cloud-cloud collisions; searching that coordinate for shock-excited emission or unusually young stellar populations would test whether the arm crossing itself drives star formation, a consequence the paper does not draw.
  • The same embedded-star absorption trick could be applied to other nearly face-on, ram-pressure-affected dwarf galaxies; if 'arms in front' turns out to be common, nearside gas placement would be the norm for stripped dwarfs rather than an LMC quirk.
  • In my reading, the by-eye 5-10 km/s widening of the disk/offset boundaries is the step that most deserves re-analysis; a fully data-driven decomposition (for example Bayesian multi-component fits) would show how much of the nearside-arm claim survives the boundary choice.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper combines GASS/GASKAP H I 21-cm emission with HST/ULLYSES UV absorption spectroscopy toward eight stars within ~2.4 degrees of 30 Doradus in the LMC. The authors define kinematic boundaries separating the LMC disk from 'offset' gas (Table 2), identify redshifted UV absorbers beyond the disk boundary, and argue from their kinematics, line widths, and spatial proximity that this gas traces the nearside portions of the LMC's gaseous arms B and E. They further use Gaussian decomposition of GASKAP data and rotation of the Nidever et al. (2008) arm paths to claim that the arms extend ~1 degree closer to 30 Doradus and converge near (l,b)=(280.5,-31.2). Additional results include multi-phase kinematic overlap, Doppler broadening analysis, electron densities and cooling rates from C II*/S II, a decreasing Al III column density with angular offset from 30 Doradus, and a comparison with the Lucchini et al. (2021) GIZMO simulation to argue that nearside gas is plausible in both outflow and inflow scenarios.

Significance. If the interpretation is correct, the paper provides one of the first down-the-barrel absorption-line constraints placing the LMC's gaseous arms B and E partly in front of the LMC, which would improve 3D models of the Magellanic System and inform the inflow/outflow debate around 30 Doradus. The paper is commendably transparent about saturation and blending, publishes detailed Voigt/AOD component tables for all sightlines, and uses public legacy data (GASS, GASKAP, ULLYSES). The Kendall tau result for Al III, if valid, is a clean, falsifiable trend. However, the central geometric claims rest on a small sample, on by-eye kinematic boundary adjustments with unquantified uncertainties, and on rotated model paths that risk being circular. The observational detection of nearside redshifted absorbers is likely robust; the specific association with arms B/E and the 1-degree extension are not established at the same level.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.2 / Table 2] The kinematic boundary between the LMC disk and offset gas is load-bearing for the arm identification. The boundaries are set by Gaussian decomposition plus by-eye 5-10 km/s adjustments; seven of eight sightlines have no velocity gap between the disk right edge and the offset left edge (Table 2), and Tables 3/4 label many components 'Disk/Offset.' Several nominal offset components lie only ~7-15 km/s above the adopted edge (e.g., sightline 3: S ii +278.8, Si ii +276.1; sightline 8: Fe ii +276.6). Since the adjustment uncertainty is comparable to that separation, a modest boundary shift would reclassify these absorbers as disk gas. This does not affect the highest-velocity absorbers (+300 to +386 km/s), but it directly affects the claim that the absorbers trace arms B/E on the near side. Please quantify boundary uncertainty (e.g., recompute classifications with Table 2 edges shifted by ±5
  2. [Section 6.1 / Figures 13-14] The ~1 degree extension claim is based on rotating the Nidever et al. (2008) predicted arm paths by 180/90/270 degrees about starting points from that same model. This is an assumption rather than a measurement: any high-velocity H I near 30 Dor will lie along one of the rotated curves if the curves are chosen to pass through the region. 'Connect seamlessly' is not quantified. Please provide a null test (e.g., equivalent 'seamlessness' for a grid of rotations and pivot positions, or compare with a simple linear extrapolation of the arm paths) and specify a numerical criterion for a match. As written, the 1-degree extension and convergence at (280.5,-31.2) are not falsifiable.
  3. [Section 4.4 / Figure 9] The Kendall tau correlation for Al III (tau = -0.68, p = 0.033) is reported as exact, but several Al III components in Tables 3/4 are lower limits from saturated AOD measurements (e.g., sightline 1 Al III +264.0; sightline 6 Al III +214.7). If the total integrated Al III column densities use these censored values, treating them as exact in a rank correlation biases the test. Please state which sightlines have censored columns and either exclude them, use a censored rank correlation, or show that the correlation is unchanged when the limits are shifted by plausible amounts.
  4. [Section 4.2 / Section 6.1] The conclusion that the absorbers are arms B/E rather than generic high-velocity disk gas or fountain material is based on kinematic overlap and proximity to the Nidever et al. (2008) paths. This is reasonable but not unique: the 'all phases share the same kinematics' statement is partly by construction, because components were selected within the offset velocity windows. The paper is candid that it cannot distinguish outflows from inflows, and that sightlines 1/2 may probe different material. The remaining risk is that the arm identification conflates the robust nearside detection (Section 7, item 1) with the specific arm extension (item 2). A direct comparison to a null model of the LMC disk's high-velocity wing (e.g., a rotating disk model without arms) would make the association far more convincing.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 1] Typo: 'NGG 2070' should be 'NGC 2070'.
  2. [Section 6.2] In the Ni/Fe comparison, 'Ne ii' should be 'Ni ii'.
  3. [Appendix A] Header typo: 'GAKSAP' should be 'GASKAP'.
  4. [Section 3.2 / Table 2] It would be helpful to mark in the table which boundaries were determined by moment analysis (sightline 4) versus by the adjusted Gaussian method, and to give an adopted uncertainty for each boundary.
  5. [Section 4.1.2] The AOD integration interval 'vcentral - b/2 <= v <= vcentral + 2b' is asymmetric; the rationale for truncating only the blue side should be stated more clearly (it is explained shortly after, but the equation itself is confusing).
  6. [Figures 13-14] The black Fe II centroids plotted on the position-velocity slices have no error bars; adding them would help assess whether the kinematic 'seamlessness' is significant.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No structural circularity: the nearside absorbers and 1-degree arm extension are independent observational results; the only self-citation (Nidever et al. 2008 arm paths) serves as an external baseline, and the by-eye H I boundary adjustment is a robustness limitation, not a circular step.

full rationale

Walking the paper's derivation chain, I find no step in which a 'prediction' is equivalent to an input by construction. (1) The sample-selection criterion in Section 2.2 requiring redshifted material near the arms is a target-selection choice, not a fitted parameter; the UV absorption centroids, Doppler parameters, and column densities are measured from ULLYSES spectra independently of the H I boundary values. (2) The nearside conclusion is geometric: absorption against background LMC stars places the absorbing gas in front of the stars regardless of the H I decomposition. (3) The claimed ~1-degree extension of arms B and E is derived from new GASKAP position-velocity maps and Gaussian decomposition, not from the Nidever et al. (2008) fit itself; the Nidever paper (which shares an author) is used as an external baseline for the arm paths and as the rotation pivot. Although the convergence point (l,b)=(280.5,-31.2) is inherited from Nidever et al. (2008) rather than independently derived, the paper presents it as a suggestion and the extension evidence comes from new data. This is a minor self-reference, not a load-bearing circular reduction. The clearest vulnerability is the by-eye adjustment of the H I disk/offset boundaries in Section 3.2 ('adjusted (~5–10 km/s beyond the upper FWHM limit)'), which could misclassify disk wing emission as offset gas; Tables 3 and 4 even label many components 'Disk/Offset Component.' That is an unquantified systematic/robustness limitation, not a circular construction: changing the boundary would relabel components, but the UV centroids themselves are not derived from that boundary. I therefore score 2 solely to acknowledge the self-citation of the arm-path baseline; the central claims retain independent observational content.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. Its results depend on the assumed 3D placement of the background stars, the prior definition of arms B and E, adopted gas temperatures, and a rotation procedure specific to this analysis. The per-sightline HI boundary choices are the largest hand-set inputs.

free parameters (4)
  • HI kinematic boundaries for disk and offset gas (per sightline) = e.g., sightline 4: disk +195 to +244, offset +262 to +312 km/s
    Chosen by Gaussian decomposition with by-eye adjustments of 5-10 km/s beyond FWHM (Section 3.2, Table 2); defines which absorbers count as offset gas.
  • Localized systemic velocity near 30 Doradus = v_LSR ≈ 232 km/s
    Estimated as the average of median velocities between disk boundaries (Table 2 note); used as the reference for 'beyond the disk'.
  • Temperature for Doppler broadening analysis = T = 10,000 K (ionized), T = 1,000-5,000 K (neutral)
    Adopted in Section 4.2, Equation 4, to separate thermal from non-thermal broadening; changes the line-width interpretation.
  • Temperature and collisional strength for electron density = T ~ 24,000 K, Ω12 = 2.82
    Adopted from Gnat & Sternberg (2007) and Hayes & Nussbaumer (1984) in Section 4.3, Equations 5-6; affects the ne and cooling rate estimates.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Background stars are embedded within the LMC disk, so intervening absorbers at arm velocities lie on the near side of the LMC.
    Invoked in Section 2.2 and Section 7; the entire nearside claim rests on this. The paper notes uncertainty about the depth of the stars within the disk.
  • domain assumption Arms B and E as defined by the Gaussian decomposition of the LAB survey (Nidever et al. 2008) are coherent structures that physically connect to the Magellanic Stream and Leading Arm.
    Used in Sections 1 and 6.1 to identify the HI features near the sightlines as arms B/E; the extension claim inherits this prior identification.
  • domain assumption The velocity ranges +212 to +270 km/s (arm B) and +220 to +290 km/s (arm E) from Kim et al. (2003) and Staveley-Smith et al. (2003) apply near 30 Doradus.
    Used in Section 4.2 and Figures 5 and 12 to match UV absorbers with arm kinematics.
  • domain assumption Thermal broadening calculations assume T = 10,000 K for ionized gas and T = 1,000-5,000 K for neutral gas (Equation 4).
    Section 4.2; the conclusions about thermal vs non-thermal broadening depend on these temperatures.
  • domain assumption S ii can serve as a proxy for C ii in electron density and cooling rate calculations, and the gas is warm so Equations 5-7 hold; cold gas would make ne values upper limits.
    Section 4.3, explicitly stated in the text; affects ne and cooling rate lower limits.
  • ad hoc to paper The 180/90/270 degree rotations of the predicted arm paths produce meaningful position-velocity cuts through the LMC disk.
    Section 6.1 and Figures 13-14; this rotation is introduced in this paper to reveal the 1-degree extension and is not a standard analysis step.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of New Interpretation for the Orientation of the LMC's Gaseous Arms B and E using ULLYSES." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6Y26ESEM

@misc{pith2026250903739,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: New Interpretation for the Orientation of the LMC's Gaseous Arms B and E using ULLYSES},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6Y26ESEM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.03739}
}
abstract

The Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) experiences disruption from tidal and ram-pressure forces as it travels through the halo of the Milky Way. In this project, we combine radio emission-line observations from the GASS and GASKAP surveys with UV absorption-line observations from the HST Ultraviolet Legacy Library of Young Stars as Essential Standards (ULLYSES) program to trace the material in front of the LMC. Along our 8 stellar sightlines near 30 Doradus, we observe gaseous structures likely associated with two arm-like features flowing in and around the LMC's disk. We detect the nearside gas in neutral, low, and medium ionization species. The lower-ionization species likely undergo both thermal and non-thermal broadening while the moderately-ionized phase is influenced by more non-thermal processes. The total integrated column density of AlIII decreases with increasing angular offset from 30 Doradus, with sightlines within 0.25 degrees containing more moderately ionized gas. We demonstrate from a Gaussian decomposition technique on the HI emission that both arms likely trace an additional 1.0 degree in Galactic longitude toward the 30 Doradus region than previously predicted. We constrain the orientation of the arms by suggesting that they likely converge around (l,b) =(280.5$^\circ$, -31.2$^\circ$) and at least partially cross in front of the LMC. Our observations are consistent with two competing origins of the arms: 1) outflowing material is swept back by tidal and ram-pressure forces or 2) tidally stripped inflows fuel the ongoing stellar activity inside the LMC. Future studies are needed to distinguish between these scenarios.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.03739 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: An integrated H i emission map of the LMC from the GASS survey over the velocity range +240 ≤ vLSR ≤ +315 km s−1 . Right: An integrated H i emission map of the 30 Doradus region from the GASKAP survey over a velocity range of +185 ≤ vLSR ≤ +335 km s−1 . We label the locations of the 8 sightlines in our project with a white star and the center of 30 Doradus with a white cross. The dashed and dotted black lines … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A moment 1 (emission-weighted mean velocity; see Equation 1) map of the LMC from the GASS survey. The locations of the 8 sightlines are marked with a star symbol. Each sightline is color coded based on the star’s radial velocity (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. A position-velocity map for sightline 4 (Sk−70◦115) using H i 21-cm emission data from GASKAP. The left and middle panels are sliced along a 0. ◦267 region through the sightline’s Galactic latitude and longitude, respectively. The LMC’s disk is prominent between +190 ≲ vLSR ≲ +245 km s−1 (highlighted in gray in the right panel) while the offset material exterior to the disk is located around +260 ≲ vLSR ≲ +310 km s−… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (17 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A plotstack of various ion transitions for sightline 4. Top Panel: GASS H i emission in terms of column density as a function of velocity. Lower Panels: Low and intermediate ion transitions. The Milky Way is located around 0 km s−1 . The gray shaded region is the kinem…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A comparison of the FWHM, center velocity, and offset from 30 Doradus for each sightline’s absorption components. We choose to show each sightline’s offset from 30 Doradus rather than display a linear increase on the top x-axis (all following offset plots are arranged …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The deviation velocity range of the redshifted absorbers from the high-velocity edge of the LMC’s H i disk as a function of offset from 30 Doradus (offset increasing from bottom to top). We emphasize that the right y-axis displaying the offset of each sight￾line from 3…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The electron density measurements across all our sightlines. Data points with upward arrows are lower limits. The error bar for the data point associated with BI184 extends below 0 cm−3 and we indicate this with a downward arrow. We order the sightlines from left to ri…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The cooling rate per nucelon measurements across all our sightlines. Data points with upward arrows are lower limits. Sightlines are arranged from left to right with increasing angular offset from 30 Doradus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Top Panel: Total integrated column densities for the offset absorbers of Ni ii (tan), P ii (green), Fe ii (purple), and Si ii (brown) for each of the sightlines. The upward arrows on the data points indicate saturated components that are lower limits. The two circle da…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: View of entire simulated Milky Way and MC system shown in Cartesian coordinates. The sun is located at (x, y,z) = (−8.122, 0, 0.023) kpc, and the z-axis is aligned with the Galactic north pole. Left: Background showing the projected gas density of the Milky Way materi…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Left: Projected gas density of a zoomed-in region around the LMC 4 kpc thick overlaid with the gas velocity field in the LMC’s rest frame. This image is rotated with respect to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Individual integrated H i emission velocity channel maps over a velocity range of +190 ≤ vLSR ≤ +340 km s−1 from the GASS survey. We label the locations of the 8 sightlines in our project with stars and their numbers correspond to the IDs in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Left: A position-velocity longitude slice through the path of arm B and its rotated 180° trajectory. Middle: A position-velocity latitude slice through arm B’s 90° and 270° rotations. In both the left and middle panels, the black dots are the velocity centroids from t…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Similar position-velocity plots as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Position-velocity maps for sightlines 1-3 and 5-8, where the numbers in the upper right corner of the middle panel correspond to the sightline IDs in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_15.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: (Continued.) offsets, ¯x is the mean of the offsets, and MS E is the Mean Square Error: MS E = 1 n Xn i=1 (Yi − Yˆ i) 2 (D2) In Equation D2, Yi is the total integrated column density of Al iii and Yˆ i are the y-values from the linear regression fit. We can simplify E…
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Plotstacks for sightlines 1-3 and 5-8. We include 4 additional ionization species for sightline 4 not highlighted in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_16.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: (Continued.) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_16.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: (Continued.) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_16.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: (Continued.) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_16.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    ,# (7),01444 '9=82<.342C 2! !22222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command Each re...

    arXiv 2019

  2. [2]

    M., & Grevesse , N

    Asplund , M., Amarsi , A. M., & Grevesse , N. 2021, , 653, A141, 10.1051/0004-6361/202140445

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140445 2021

  3. [3]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, , 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  4. [4]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f 2018

  5. [5]

    M., Lim , P

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Lim , P. L., et al. 2022, , 935, 167, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 2022

  6. [6]

    A., Lehner , N., & Howk , J

    Barger , K. A., Lehner , N., & Howk , J. C. 2016, , 817, 91, 10.3847/0004-637X/817/2/91

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/817/2/91 2016

  7. [7]

    2009, , 395, 342, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14514.x

    Bekki , K., & Stanimirovi \'c , S. 2009, , 395, 342, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14514.x

    arXiv 2009

  8. [8]

    2012, , 421, 2109, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20466.x

    Besla , G., Kallivayalil , N., Hernquist , L., et al. 2012, , 421, 2109, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20466.x

    arXiv 2012

Show all 109 references
  1. [9]

    M., Crowther , P

    Bestenlehner , J. M., Crowther , P. A., Caballero-Nieves , S. M., et al. 2020, , 499, 1918, 10.1093/mnras/staa2801

    2020 doi

  2. [10]

    J., Bertoldi , F., et al

    Brandl , B., Sams , B. J., Bertoldi , F., et al. 1996, , 466, 254, 10.1086/177507

    1996 doi

  3. [11]

    2005, , 432, 45, 10.1051/0004-6361:20040321

    Br \"u ns , C., Kerp , J., Staveley-Smith , L., et al. 2005, , 432, 45, 10.1051/0004-6361:20040321

    2005 doi

  4. [12]

    A., D'Onghia , E., Zweibel , E

    Bustard , C., Pardy , S. A., D'Onghia , E., Zweibel , E. G., & Gallagher , J. S., I. 2018, , 863, 49, 10.3847/1538-4357/aad08f

    2018 doi

  5. [13]

    H., Kulkarni , V

    Cashman , F. H., Kulkarni , V. P., Kisielius , R., Ferland , G. J., & Bogdanovich , P. 2017, , 230, 8, 10.3847/1538-4365/aa6d84

    2017 doi

  6. [14]

    A., Evans , C

    Castro , N., Crowther , P. A., Evans , C. J., et al. 2018, , 614, A147, 10.1051/0004-6361/201732084

    2018 doi

  7. [15]

    L., Olsen , K., et al

    Choi , Y., Nidever , D. L., Olsen , K., et al. 2018, , 866, 90, 10.3847/1538-4357/aae083

    2018 doi

  8. [16]

    A., Barger , K

    Ciampa , D. A., Barger , K. A., Lehner , N., et al. 2021, , 908, 62, 10.3847/1538-4357/abd320

    2021 doi

  9. [17]

    P., et al

    Cignoni , M., Sabbi , E., van der Marel , R. P., et al. 2015, , 811, 76, 10.1088/0004-637X/811/2/76

    2015 doi

  10. [18]

    A., Caballero-Nieves , S

    Crowther , P. A., Caballero-Nieves , S. M., Bostroem , K. A., et al. 2016, , 458, 624, 10.1093/mnras/stw273

    2016 doi

  11. [19]

    S., Braun , J

    de Boer , K. S., Braun , J. M., Vallenari , A., & Mebold , U. 1998, , 329, L49, 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9711052

    1998 doi arXiv

  12. [20]

    E., & Bono , G

    de Grijs , R., Wicker , J. E., & Bono , G. 2014, , 147, 122, 10.1088/0004-6256/147/5/122

    2014 doi

  13. [21]

    M., Mallery , R

    De Propris , R., Rich , R. M., Mallery , R. C., & Howard , C. D. 2010, , 714, L249, 10.1088/2041-8205/714/2/L249

    2010 doi

  14. [22]

    D., & Bekki , K

    Diaz , J. D., & Bekki , K. 2012, , 750, 36, 10.1088/0004-637X/750/1/36

    2012 doi

  15. [23]

    M., Mebold , U., Marx , M., et al

    Dickey , J. M., Mebold , U., Marx , M., et al. 1994, , 289, 357

    1994

  16. [24]

    M., McClure-Griffiths , N., Gibson , S

    Dickey , J. M., McClure-Griffiths , N., Gibson , S. J., et al. 2013, , 30, e003, 10.1017/pasa.2012.003

    2013 doi

  17. [25]

    E., & Hunter , D

    Dolphin , A. E., & Hunter , D. A. 1998, , 116, 1275, 10.1086/300493

    1998 doi

  18. [26]

    J., Kennedy , M

    Evans , C. J., Kennedy , M. B., Dufton , P. L., et al. 2015, , 574, A13, 10.1051/0004-6361/201424414

    2015 doi

  19. [27]

    Fitzpatrick , E. L. 1991, , 103, 1123, 10.1086/132934

    1991 doi

  20. [28]

    For , B.-Q., Staveley-Smith , L., & McClure-Griffiths , N. M. 2013, , 764, 74, 10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/74

    2013 doi

  21. [29]

    J., Frazer , E

    Fox , A. J., Frazer , E. M., Bland-Hawthorn , J., et al. 2020, , 897, 23, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab92a3

    2020 doi

  22. [30]

    J., Richter , P., Wakker , B

    Fox , A. J., Richter , P., Wakker , B. P., et al. 2013, , 772, 110, 10.1088/0004-637X/772/2/110

    2013 doi

  23. [31]

    J., Wakker , B

    Fox , A. J., Wakker , B. P., Smoker , J. V., et al. 2010, , 718, 1046, 10.1088/0004-637X/718/2/1046

    2010 doi

  24. [32]

    J., Wakker , B

    Fox , A. J., Wakker , B. P., Barger , K. A., et al. 2014, , 787, 147, 10.1088/0004-637X/787/2/147

    2014 doi

  25. [33]

    J., Barger , K

    Fox , A. J., Barger , K. A., Wakker , B. P., et al. 2018, , 854, 142, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa9bb

    2018 doi

  26. [34]

    T., Turfus , C., & Putman , M

    Gardiner , L. T., Turfus , C., & Putman , M. E. 1998, , 507, L35, 10.1086/311668

    1998 doi

  27. [35]

    2007, , 168, 213, 10.1086/509786

    Gnat , O., & Sternberg , A. 2007, , 168, 213, 10.1086/509786

    2007 doi

  28. [36]

    Grand , R. J. J., G \'o mez , F. A., Marinacci , F., et al. 2017, , 467, 179, 10.1093/mnras/stx071

    2017 doi

  29. [37]

    C., Froning , C

    Green , J. C., Froning , C. S., Osterman , S., et al. 2012, , 744, 60, 10.1088/0004-637X/744/1/6010.1086/141956

    2012

  30. [38]

    2019, ASKAPsoft: ASKAP science data processor software , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1912.003

    Guzman , J., Whiting , M., Voronkov , M., et al. 2019, ASKAPsoft: ASKAP science data processor software , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1912.003

    2019

  31. [39]

    M., Reynolds , R

    Haffner , L. M., Reynolds , R. J., & Tufte , S. L. 1999, , 523, 223, 10.1086/307734

    1999 doi

  32. [40]

    B., Flores , H., Puech , M., & Fouquet , S

    Hammer , F., Yang , Y. B., Flores , H., Puech , M., & Fouquet , S. 2015, , 813, 110, 10.1088/0004-637X/813/2/110

    2015 doi

  33. [41]

    2009, , 138, 1243, 10.1088/0004-6256/138/5/1243

    Harris , J., & Zaritsky , D. 2009, , 138, 1243, 10.1088/0004-6256/138/5/1243

    2009 doi

  34. [42]

    2000, , 364, 83

    Haud , U. 2000, , 364, 83

    2000

  35. [43]

    A., & Nussbaumer , H

    Hayes , M. A., & Nussbaumer , H. 1984, , 134, 193

    1984

  36. [44]

    1990, , 356, 359, 10.1086/168845

    Hernquist , L. 1990, , 356, 359, 10.1086/168845

    1990 doi

  37. [45]

    Holland , S. T. 2014, COS Instrument Handbook v. 6.0

    2014

  38. [46]

    Hopkins , P. F. 2015, , 450, 53, 10.1093/mnras/stv195

    2015 doi

  39. [47]

    C., Sembach , K

    Howk , J. C., Sembach , K. R., Savage , B. D., et al. 2002, , 569, 214, 10.1086/339322

    2002 doi

  40. [48]

    R., Straw , S., Jones , T

    Hyland , A. R., Straw , S., Jones , T. J., & Gatley , I. 1992, , 257, 391, 10.1093/mnras/257.3.391

    1992 doi

  41. [49]

    Jenkins , E. B. 2009, , 700, 1299, 10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/1299

    2009 doi

  42. [50]

    B., Bowen , D

    Jenkins , E. B., Bowen , D. V., Tripp , T. M., & Sembach , K. R. 2005, , 623, 767, 10.1086/428878

    2005 doi

  43. [51]

    A., Staveley-Smith , L., & Bessell , M

    Kim , S., Dopita , M. A., Staveley-Smith , L., & Bessell , M. S. 1999, , 118, 2797, 10.1086/301116

    1999 doi

  44. [52]

    A., et al

    Kim , S., Staveley-Smith , L., Dopita , M. A., et al. 1998, , 503, 674, 10.1086/306030

    1998 doi

  45. [53]

    2003, , 148, 473, 10.1086/376980

    ---. 2003, , 148, 473, 10.1086/376980

    2003 doi

  46. [54]

    F., Wielebinski , R., & Meinert , D

    Klein , U., Haynes , R. F., Wielebinski , R., & Meinert , D. 1993, , 271, 402

    1993

  47. [55]

    J., D'Onghia , E., et al

    Krishnarao , D., Fox , A. J., D'Onghia , E., et al. 2022, , 609, 915, 10.1038/s41586-022-05090-5

    2022 doi

  48. [56]

    2018, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1803.01187, 10.48550/arXiv.1803.01187

    Krogager , J.-K. 2018, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1803.01187, 10.48550/arXiv.1803.01187

    2018 doi arXiv

  49. [57]

    Lehner , N., & Howk , J. C. 2007, , 377, 687, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11631.x

    2007

  50. [58]

    Lehner , N., Staveley-Smith , L., & Howk , J. C. 2009, , 702, 940, 10.1088/0004-637X/702/2/940

    2009 doi

  51. [59]

    P., & Savage , B

    Lehner , N., Wakker , B. P., & Savage , B. D. 2004, , 615, 767, 10.1086/424730

    2004 doi

  52. [60]

    Lucchini , S., D'Onghia , E., & Fox , A. J. 2021, , 921, L36, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac3338

    2021 doi

  53. [61]

    J., et al

    Lucchini , S., D'Onghia , E., Fox , A. J., et al. 2020, , 585, 203, 10.1038/s41586-020-2663-4

    2020 doi

  54. [62]

    1992, , 263, 41

    Luks , T., & Rohlfs , K. 1992, , 263, 41

    1992

  55. [63]

    2000, , 119, 2214, 10.1086/301345

    Massey , P., Waterhouse , E., & DeGioia-Eastwood , K. 2000, , 119, 2214, 10.1086/301345

    2000 doi

  56. [64]

    M., Pisano , D

    McClure-Griffiths , N. M., Pisano , D. J., Calabretta , M. R., et al. 2009, , 181, 398, 10.1088/0067-0049/181/2/398

    2009 doi

  57. [65]

    X., & Newton , L

    McGee , R. X., & Newton , L. M. 1986, , 6, 471, 10.1017/S1323358000018415

    1986 doi

  58. [66]

    1984, , 211, 521, 10.1093/mnras/211.3.521

    Meaburn , J. 1984, , 211, 521, 10.1093/mnras/211.3.521

    1984 doi

  59. [67]

    2023, STIS Instrument Handbook for Cycle 31 v

    Medallon , S., & Welty , D. 2023, STIS Instrument Handbook for Cycle 31 v. 22.0

    2023

  60. [68]

    J., Krishnarao , D., et al

    Mishra , S., Fox , A. J., Krishnarao , D., et al. 2024, , 976, L28, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad8b9d

    2024 doi

  61. [69]

    L., & Chwalik , E

    Nidever , D. L., & Chwalik , E. 2022, GaussDecomp , 1.0.1, 10.5281/zenodo.227955549

    2022 doi

  62. [70]

    L., Majewski , S

    Nidever , D. L., Majewski , S. R., & Butler Burton , W. 2008, , 679, 432, 10.1086/587042

    2008 doi

  63. [71]

    2004, , 48, 727, 10.1016/j.newar.2004.03.008

    Niemela , V., & Gamen , R. 2004, , 48, 727, 10.1016/j.newar.2004.03.008

    2004 doi

  64. [72]

    Olano , C. A. 2004, , 423, 895, 10.1051/0004-6361:20040177

    2004 doi

  65. [73]

    Olsen , K. A. G., Zaritsky , D., Blum , R. D., Boyer , M. L., & Gordon , K. D. 2011, , 737, 29, 10.1088/0004-637X/737/1/29

    2011 doi

  66. [74]

    2011, , 735, 6, 10.1088/0004-637X/735/1/6

    Paradis , D., Paladini , R., Noriega-Crespo , A., et al. 2011, , 735, 6, 10.1088/0004-637X/735/1/6

    2011 doi

  67. [75]

    A., D'Onghia , E., & Fox , A

    Pardy , S. A., D'Onghia , E., & Fox , A. J. 2018, , 857, 101, 10.3847/1538-4357/aab95b

    2018 doi

  68. [76]

    2013, in Advancing the Physics of Cosmic Distances, ed

    Pietrzy \'n ski , G., Gieren , W., Graczyk , D., et al. 2013, in Advancing the Physics of Cosmic Distances, ed. R. de Grijs , Vol. 289, 169--172, 10.1017/S174392131202131X

    2013 doi

  69. [77]

    M., Dempsey , J., McClure-Griffiths , N

    Pingel , N. M., Dempsey , J., McClure-Griffiths , N. M., et al. 2022, , 39, e005, 10.1017/pasa.2021.59

    2022 doi

  70. [78]

    E., Kupka , F., Ryabchikova , T

    Piskunov , N. E., Kupka , F., Ryabchikova , T. A., Weiss , W. W., & Jeffery , C. S. 1995, , 112, 525

    1995

  71. [79]

    2025, , 984, 161, 10.3847/1538-4357/adc099

    Poudel , S., Horton , A., Vazquez , J., et al. 2025, , 984, 161, 10.3847/1538-4357/adc099

    2025 doi

  72. [80]

    E., Gibson , B

    Putman , M. E., Gibson , B. K., Staveley-Smith , L., et al. 1998, , 394, 752, 10.1038/29466

    1998 doi

  73. [81]

    R., Hainich , R., et al

    Ramachandran , V., Hamann , W. R., Hainich , R., et al. 2018, , 615, A40, 10.1051/0004-6361/201832816

    2018 doi

  74. [83]

    J., Wakker , B

    Richter , P., Fox , A. J., Wakker , B. P., et al. 2018, , 865, 145, 10.3847/1538-4357/aadd0f

    2018 doi

  75. [84]

    2013, , 772, 111, 10.1088/0004-637X/772/2/111

    ---. 2013, , 772, 111, 10.1088/0004-637X/772/2/111

    2013 doi

  76. [85]

    R., Taylor , J

    Roman-Duval , J., Proffitt , C. R., Taylor , J. M., et al. 2020, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 4, 205, 10.3847/2515-5172/abca2f

    2020 doi

  77. [86]

    1978, , 31, 243

    Rousseau , J., Martin , N., Pr \'e vot , L., et al. 1978, , 31, 243

    1978

  78. [87]

    2012, , 537, A106, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117863

    Rubele , S., Kerber , L., Girardi , L., et al. 2012, , 537, A106, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117863

    2012 doi

  79. [88]

    1992, , 261, L29

    Rubio , M., Roth , M., & Garcia , J. 1992, , 261, L29

    1992

  80. [89]

    C., & Dopita , M

    Russell , S. C., & Dopita , M. A. 1992, , 384, 508, 10.1086/170893

    1992 doi

  81. [90]

    J., Moos , H

    Sahnow , D. J., Moos , H. W., Ake , T. B., et al. 2000, , 538, L7, 10.1086/312794

    2000 doi

  82. [91]

    2015, , 815, 77, 10.1088/0004-637X/815/1/77

    Salem , M., Besla , G., Bryan , G., et al. 2015, , 815, 77, 10.1088/0004-637X/815/1/77

    2015 doi

  83. [92]

    2024, , 688, A104, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347479

    Sana , H., Tramper , F., Abdul-Masih , M., et al. 2024, , 688, A104, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347479

    2024 doi

  84. [93]

    D., & Sembach , K

    Savage , B. D., & Sembach , K. R. 1991, , 379, 245, 10.1086/170498

    1991 doi

  85. [94]

    1999, , 341, 98

    Selman , F., Melnick , J., Bosch , G., & Terlevich , R. 1999, , 341, 98

    1999

  86. [95]

    2023, , 676, A85, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346108

    Serebriakova , N., Tkachenko , A., Gebruers , S., et al. 2023, , 676, A85, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346108

    2023 doi

  87. [96]

    J., Besla , G., Patel , E., et al

    Setton , D. J., Besla , G., Patel , E., et al. 2023, , 959, L11, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0da6

    2023 doi

  88. [97]

    R., & Field , G

    Shapiro , P. R., & Field , G. B. 1976, , 205, 762, 10.1086/154332

    1976 doi

  89. [98]

    2009, The FUSE Archival Data Handbook

    Sonnentrucker , P., Massa , D., Kruk , J., et al. 2009, The FUSE Archival Data Handbook

    2009

  90. [99]

    2005, , 364, 1105, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x

    Springel , V. 2005, , 364, 1105, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x

    2005

  91. [100]

    R., Haynes , R

    Staveley-Smith , L., Kim , S., Calabretta , M. R., Haynes , R. F., & Kesteven , M. J. 2003, , 339, 87, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06146.x

    2003

  92. [101]

    T., Marshall , J

    van Loon , J. T., Marshall , J. R., & Zijlstra , A. A. 2005, , 442, 597, 10.1051/0004-6361:20053528

    2005 doi

  93. [102]

    T., Bailey , M., Tatton , B

    van Loon , J. T., Bailey , M., Tatton , B. L., et al. 2013, , 550, A108, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220210

    2013 doi

  94. [103]

    S., Kerp , J., & Kalberla , P

    Venzmer , M. S., Kerp , J., & Kalberla , P. M. W. 2012, , 547, A12, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118677

    2012 doi

  95. [104]

    Walborn , N. R. 1977, , 215, 53, 10.1086/155334

    1977 doi

  96. [105]

    Walborn , N. R. 1991, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 148, The Magellanic Clouds, ed. R. Haynes & D. Milne , 145

    1991

  97. [106]

    R., & Blades , J

    Walborn , N. R., & Blades , J. C. 1997, , 112, 457, 10.1086/313043

    1997 doi

  98. [107]

    1999, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol

    Walker , A. 1999, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 237, Post-Hipparcos Cosmic Candles, ed. A. Heck & F. Caputo , 125, 10.1007/978-94-011-4734-7_8

    1999 doi

  99. [108]

    2022, , 515, 940, 10.1093/mnras/stac1640

    Wang , J., Hammer , F., & Yang , Y. 2022, , 515, 940, 10.1093/mnras/stac1640

    2022 doi

  100. [109]

    F., Lehner , N., Howk , J

    Zech , W. F., Lehner , N., Howk , J. C., Dixon , W. V. D., & Brown , T. M. 2008, , 679, 460, 10.1086/587135

    2008 doi

  101. [110]

    2024, , 974, 22, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad64d2

    Zheng , Y., Tchernyshyov , K., Olsen , K., et al. 2024, , 974, 22, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad64d2

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.